Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 45,991 through 46,020 (of 46,996 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anyone going to the TB Game? #6829
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Enjoy. Hope it’s a better game than last Sunday.

    in reply to: game reactions from around the net (ongoing thread) #6827
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Zooey wrote:
    Well, Tavon did not have a good day, did he.

    If you hate West Virginians so much
    maybe you should go live
    in North Korea.

    w
    v

    It is incumbent on all posters to read posts carefully before responding to them.

    Nowhere does Zooey say or imply that Tavon is North Korean.

    .

    in reply to: game reactions from around the net (ongoing thread) #6820
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Speed Kills

    Stacy/Cunningham had 16 carries for 64 yards 4 avg

    Peterson 21 carries 75 yards 3.6 avg

    Corderelle Patterson 3 carries 102 yards and a 67 yard TD

    Tavon Austin/Givens 4 carries 9 yards 0 TD

    The Vikings did not stuff the Rams ground game… the narrative does not fit. The Rams had success on the ground and were forced to get away from that ground game once they got behind

    My eyes not only told me they ran the ball well when they tried…the stats supported it too

    I have game rewind man…. Some say the Vikings stuffed the Rams run game. My eyes didn’t see that when I finally watched. They got behind and had to get away from it, they were seeing stacked boxes (nothing new there) so wanted to throw against that with these weapons but when they did run they had success

    Now the game was a disaster….but we don’t need to pile on and make stuff up that didn’t happen. The. Rams messed up enough on their own

    To win in the NFL you need good players, good coaches, and a bit of good fortune

    10 years after the GSO the lack of good fortune has been as big a contributing factor to the Rams being disappointing as anything

    I’m not saying that Fishers has been great and he is not off limits but seriously the team cannot not catch a break

    Once again the Rams open up the season wanting to utilize some of these toys in the pass game but they can’t block anyone. Go back and look at Tavons touches vs Patterson’s. The Rams used Tavon very similarly. What was the difference IMO? Execution

    people are so quick to blame Shotty… like they did last year but don’t take into account that the Rams have to block on the edges (and they didn’t) and there are execution issues, just like last year (and when I say that some of it is Austin too).

    the Rams could and should get Tavon going vertical more often and on the outside. No one can run with him… so get him down the field. Though I don’t have an issue the Rams running Tavon up the middle … they just need to execute it better (and obviously won’t make a living at doing that)

    IMO what the Rams really have to do is get this oline playing better…and I know its early but what do you think of having them go back to a base of 21 and 12 personnel until the line develops some confidence? They can still play Austin out of that formation on the outside… they just need to be selective.

    I also think that the Bradford injury really hurt this team from a playing standpoint. Fisher pulled everyone in that third game after two series and didn’t play any of these guys in that 4th game. I think some of that showed up on Sunday.

    Hill’s INT. I have no problem with the Rams throwing there… none. Again it was the execution…. Hill needs to throw the ball away.

    There wasn’t that much pressure on that play… It was a bad decision/execution

    We have been begging this team to take more chances…. Not to be so conservative get the ball down the field.

    So now Hill throws an int and all of the sudden people like Wagnor have amnesia? They were down 6-0 to frickin Vikings… Not facing the Seahawks on the road.

    They wanted to try and get some points on the board and they certainly weren’t being overwhelmed at that point.

    I feel sorry for Chris… He has put in the work man….. He deserve better than this crap

    Just like Jackson they will use him up then he will just be done

    in reply to: JT Chat Highlights 9/09 #6817
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    There are a lot of things in this one I agree with.

    ===

    Schotty? I think he’s a bright mind. Sure there are things I’d like to see done differently from game to game. But all the negativity towards him surprises me for the most part.

    The Rams had five completions of more than 20 yards on Sunday, which is twice their average (of 2.5 pass plays of 20-yards plus per game) last season. It’s more than any single game last season. In addition, there were incomplete deep shots to Brian Quick (should’ve been a pass interference) and one to Kenny Britt (underthrown, Britt was open). There were a thousand things that were at fault Sunday, failure to throw the ball deep was not one of them.

    The fact that many of these linemen barely played in the preseason showed on Sunday.

    Granted he was thrust into a tough spot. But [Davis] needs to make decisions quicker, throw the ball away instead of taking the sack, and learn to step up in the pocket.

    it will take a total collapse _ 4 or 5 wins _ for Fisher’s seat to get warm.

    What Needs to Be Done to beat the Bucs? 1.) Cut the penalties in half from last week. 2.) Cut the missed tackles by two-thirds from last week. 3.) Do a much better job defending the perimeter. . . . .And three things aren’t enough to right this ship. . .4.) Establish the run early.

    If you’re playing a close-to-the-vest, conservative offensive style, you simply have to minimize mistakes. Plain and simple.

    It was amazing to me that Bates would get a penalty like that. And he should’ve been penalized earlier but the refs just missed it: i.e., when he was celebrating _ WITH HIS HELMET OFF on the field after the flag was picked up for running into the return man. Simply amazing.

    in reply to: we spend real time money, not prorated money #6813
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Thats nice. Once they restructure Sam Bradford’s deal they should be in great shape.

    Grits

    They already are in great shape.

    The whole point of this approach was to leave space in future years. They’ve already done that.

    in reply to: game reactions from around the net (ongoing thread) #6805
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    some more. I’m being very one-sided looks like. If you see things that fit your view better then post them…actually my ideal is that many people contribute posts to a thread like this, not just me

    jrry32

    I’m going to try and inject some optimism. The season isn’t over, the sky isn’t falling, and the Rams aren’t the worst team in football. Am I angry? Yes. I am angry that the team came out and played that poorly in week 1. That all said, there are 15 games left in the season. We were down to our 3rd string QB when the game went from 13-0 to 34-6.

    And frankly, the game very likely could have been 6-0 if our starting QB never got hurt(as he was injured on the play with the INT and I think that contributed to throw-away not reaching the sidelines). Hell, the game could have been 9-0 at half if the refs had called the holding or even 7-6 Rams if the refs hadn’t blown the call on the Cassel fumble when Quinn hit him from behind as the Rams likely have a scoop and score on that play.

    Regardless, things didn’t go our way and we lost…badly. But may I remind you…this isn’t the first time this happened. We lost to Dallas by 24 last year. We lost to San Francisco by 23 last year. And that was with Sam Bradford.

    Yes, we all thought we had the talent to beat Minnesota. We were all confident coming into the game. Maybe too confident. But there’s no reason to give up on the season quite so soon. If the team comes out in the next couple games and doesn’t look any better then I completely understand at that point. However, I think we’re a better team than we showed against Minnesota and we’ll come out and prove it. But we’re not the 49ers, Seahawks, etc. We don’t have the talent to compensate for losing our starting QB.

    We probably won’t be contending for the playoffs this year even with Shaun Hill. I hope we do but I don’t see it as likely. However, I do believe we can be competitive. I also believe that Hill wasn’t bad in the first half against the Vikings. I think the Rams as a whole can come out more focused and execute better. And when they do, you’ll see a competitive team.

    We’re all pissed about the loss but the anger, resentment, disappointment, etc. just isn’t contributing to anything. It just brings about more anger, resentment, disappointment, and misery.

    Cheer up, we have 15 games left to play, we have a lot of football to enjoy and this team still has plenty of time to right the ship. If we can get destroyed by 47 total points in back to back games last year and rebound to finish the year 6-6 with Kellen Clemens starting 9 of those games. We can sure as hell bounce back from this beating and do some damage with Shaun Hill.

    in reply to: game reactions from around the net (ongoing thread) #6804
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Just a message to Dak. I thought your posts in this thread would get kind of lost and overlooked here, so I moved them to the big “game reaction” type thread:

    http://theramshuddle.com/topic/shall-we-talk-draft/

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Mike Sando says Roger Goodell is safe – for now

    in reply to: Monday Night's Jeff Fisher Show #6789
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This was good, as usual.

    in reply to: JT Chat Highlights 9/09 #6788
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think the Hill’s injury should’ve been announced before Austin took a snap in the second half. That started the whole thing. And I think Hill should’ve just talked about the injury in the locker room afterwards. This team’s recurring paranoia about giving out injury information is almost funny.

    My theory.

    There’s a reason Hill wouldn’t talk about the injury. He didn’t want to give anything away, and he didn’t want to stand there and fabricate. Give what away? Lie about what?

    He was injured before and what happened in the game re-aggravated it.

    But the Rams didn’t report it.

    That’s my theory.

    in reply to: game reactions from around the net (ongoing thread) #6781
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Big Amoco Sign

    Fisher was blown out 59-0 once and came back and won 30-13…the next game after.

    I guess we should calm down a little.

    In 2009, Fisher was blown out by the Patriots 59-0. The Titans started 0-6 with that loss capping it off. Then they won 7 of their next 8 games. With Kerry Collins I might add

    Fisher can get a team back on track.

    ——

    alyoshamucci

    I start with the good stuff on here, regardless of how ugly the games were, and in general I have a optimistic POV. It’s my nature, understanding psychology, to lean into the positive, life is hard enough as it is, and life as a Rams fan is . . well . . ugly sometimes.

    First thing I want to say before getting started is that until the INT and subsequent TD at the end of the half, we seemed to be playing the game we wanted to play. there were some errors and some penalties . . but we were moving the ball and shutting AP down. After the pick and the entrance of A Davis, we were done. Team was deflated after losing hill. We played good football in the first half. So did they. Hill made a terrible decision that put us in a hole. But the overall play didn’t go down until Davis got under center.

    Also, I did not watch the fourth quarter, I had important laundry refolding to do.

    The Good

    1) The young DBs. Gaines!!! What a great job, a professional job, by a 6th round draft pick. I saw someone bust on him for the TD catch by multi-pro bowler Greg Jennings on a perfect throw in the back of the end zone . . I don’t get that. He did an amazing job all game, 2 passes defended and plenty of solid tackles. Joyner showed up with his tackling also. Jenks was playing really well in coverage (the tennis balls in practice seemed to have helped his grab issues), and has shown up better as a tackler also. Across the board, the part of our team I thought would be weakest was really strong.

    2) Brian Quick. “Reliable and consistent” was not ever something I expected to be addressing him with. He was open, and aggressive. Im considering picking him up in fantasy ball.

    3) Quinn forced how many penalties?

    4) TJ and Mcleod were playing with fury. I love seeing that. You’re going to miss some tackles on AP, that doesn’t bother me.

    5) Langford was really stout. And overall our run defense gave me a lot of hope. Gadget WR sweeps are not basic run defense.

    6) Tree was all over the place.

    7) It can really only get better from here.

    The Bad

    8) Refs. I should not have to list this. It’s dumb. The roughing the passer penalty? The offsides? The spot on the Quick catch?

    9) Jeff Fisher not challenging the Quinn hit that was called an incomplete pass. Quinn hits people so hard that the ball goes forward when the palm is empty. That should have been a TO. Jeff needs to know that every time Quinn makes contact the ball is coming out.

    10) Tavon in the backfield. Zac Stacy needs to get in rhythm with the O line, and he’s messing around? Once is fine, don’t do it 6 times.

    11) Bailey being suspended.

    The Ugly

    12) Interior pass blocking. What. the. he!!. Saffold and Wells and Joseph got eaten alive by Linval Joseph and Shariff Floyd. Are they that good? I don’t think so. They looked like they expected an easy game.

    13) Shaun Hill’s INT. You DO NOT throw that ball.

    14) Austin Davis.

    15) Tavon’s 2 bobbled punts.

    16) The scoreboard.

    17) The body language of the team. Unacceptable.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Covering up brain injury info, bounty gate and now this…the NFL is making Haliburton, Big Tobacco and BP look good.

    The difference being, public disapproval COULD lead to Goddell being replaced and at least a portion of a change in the culture.

    Those other corporations? Yeah good luck.

    We complain that the NFL is too corporate.

    The actual corporations think it’s not corporate ENOUGH.

    .

    in reply to: RamView, 9/7/2014: Vikings 34, Rams 6 (Long) #6747
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think complaining about Hill is over the top.

    I mean I know an opening day loss is demoralizing, but, that doesn’t mean you have to kill ALL your brain cells.

    Leave some.

    ..

    • This reply was modified 11 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photozn.
    in reply to: What Bucs Fans Are Saying About Their Game #6745
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well, usually i am in accord with maryJane
    but in this case i’m gonna just say no.

    w
    v

    This is what you meant, right?

    x

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Anyway, Goodell is a corporate-suit. He was out of his league on this one.

    w
    v

    The problem is national. It’s not just football. He was out of his league.

    You know what just gets me shaking my head, beyond the incident itself. There are STILL guys out there on Der Net saying stuff like “well a guy has to defend himself.” I am not kidding and can link you to that kind of thing.

    in reply to: Wagoner and others on Hill's status #6723
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I noticed during the rewind of the first half
    Hill seemed a tad gimpy. Just a hint of a limp.
    The quad injury seems the most likely explanation
    for his being replaced.

    w
    v

    =============

    Fisher: No conspiracy; Hill was hurt

    Jim Thomas

    Apparently no fan of conspiracy theories, Jeff Fisher called speculation that Shaun Hill was benched and wasn’t really injured “absurd” during his Monday media session.

    “To clarify things once again, Shaun Hill strained a quad in the second quarter, and that was the reason he did not return,” Fisher said.

    Fisher said Hill’s status is day-to-day this week but if healthy, he will start this Sunday at Tampa Bay.

    “There’s no issue there,” Fisher said. “Shaun’s our quarterback, so if he’s healthy he starts. And that’ll be the case throughout the season.”

    Several factors made the halftime quarterback change seem curious in the Rams’ 34-6, season-opening loss to Minnesota. For one, Davis was already in for a few plays at the start of the second half before it was announced that Hill had a quad — or thigh — injury.

    For another, there was no definitive play where Hill appeared to get injured, at least to the naked eye.

    “Typically, quad strains are the result of running,” Fisher said. “It was not a contusion. It was not impact. It started to get sore earlier in the game as he was escaping pressure.”

    Fisher said he made the decision to go with Davis with input from Hill.

    “We discussed it in the locker room at halftime,” Fisher said. “We discussed it after we came out on the field. He wanted to play, but he felt — he was in agreement with me — that the best thing for the immediate future here next week or the week to follow would be that he didn’t make it any worse.

    “Because if you make it any worse, then you’re looking at a significant amount of (missed) play time.”

    Fisher said Hill wasn’t upset about the quarterback change. “He totally understood,” Fisher said. “You know, he actually tried to throw that ball away.”

    Fisher was referring to Hill’s costly interception near the end of the first half.

    “He wasn’t trying to throw it to Cookie (tight end Jared Cook),” Fisher said. “He lacked the lower-body strength to make the throw. That was a concern of his.”

    Scrambling right to evade the Minnesota pass rush, Hill threw off his back foot into double coverage near the Rams’ sideline. Nickel back Josh Robinson made a leaping interception at the St. Louis 35, and the Vikings converted the takeaway into a touchdown right before the half to take a 13-0 lead.

    Hill didn’t appear to be limping when he came out in the second half and was still in uniform with no ice on the leg or any kind of wrap to be seen.

    “He felt like he could take a shotgun snap and throw the ball if we had an issue with Austin,” Fisher said. “So therefore, we kept him dressed and kept him on the sideline.”

    No. 3 quarterback Case Keenum was on the pregame inactive list.

    Hill declined to answer questions from reporters about the injury after the game, referring all queries to Fisher. He even declined to say how the injury occurred. That only fueled speculation that something was amiss.

    When Fisher met with reporters early Monday evening, he said he was unaware of any conspiracy theory rumblings about Hill being benched, not injured.

    “I’m telling you the truth,” Fisher said. “I’ve never, never messed around with the quarterback situation my entire career. I’m speaking truthfully. He had a quad strain, and I took him out of the game, period.

    “On the depth chart, he’s clearly ahead of Austin Davis. It’s not a negative commentary on Austin, but (Hill) gives us the best chance to win. If he can’t go, then Austin steps up and then he gives us the best chance to win.”

    But as for conspiracy theories?

    “That’s absurd,” Fisher said.

    As he spoke Monday, Fisher wasn’t sure if Hill would be able to practice Wednesday, when the team returns to practice. The plan is to give Davis more work this week with the starters, just in case.

    Making his first start since 2010, Hill started the game by completing his first five passes but completed only three of his final eight to end the half. The misses in order:

    • Running back Zac Stacy dropped a screen pass that could’ve gone for good yardage on the Rams’ second possession.

    • Flushed out of the pocket and under pressure, he threw away a pass on a play in which Kenny Britt was the nearest receiver early in the second quarter.

    • Referee Ed Hochuli picked up a flag on what appeared to be an illegal contact or pass interference penalty on a deep ball to Brian Quick on the Rams’ fourth series.

    • Two plays later, on a miscommunication between Britt and Hill, Hill threw deep and Britt cut his route off short. The ball hit the turf well beyond anyone on the field.

    • And then came the interception.

    So you could make the case that the only truly bad throw by Hill in the first half was the interception.

    “Shaun was effective,” Fisher said. “He made plays. They pressured him; we expected them to pressure him as anybody would a backup quarterback.

    “But I thought he was effective. You saw the throws he made. The timing throws that he made. He was under pressure. We had a protection issue. … But I thought had he stayed in game we would’ve had a chance.

    “Realistically speaking, we’re two plays away from going into the locker room at halftime 6-3. Make a field goal, throw that (interception) away. Punt it away. Even with 2 minutes left to go in the third quarter, we’re down 10. You normally think you’d have a shot with the veteran quarterback.”

    It was 6-0 and not 6-3 before the Hill interception and the resulting Minnesota TD because Greg Zuerlein barely missed a 50-yard field goal, wide left, on the Rams’ second possession.

    in reply to: Fisher, 9/08 – video & transcript #6722
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – September 8, 2014

    (Opening remarks)
    “Postgame I mentioned, I discussed several injuries, we had three of significance. I really don’t have much information for you other than, (OL) Rodger (Saffold) looked like he checked out okay. We’re still doing tests on (DE) Chris (Long), hopefully we’ll have some more information; that’s an ankle injury. To clarify things once again, (QB) Shaun Hill strained a quad in the second quarter and that was the reason he did not return. He felt like he could take a shotgun snap and throw the ball if we had an issue with (QB) Austin (Davis), so therefore we kept him dressed and kept him on the sideline. He’ll be day-to-day this week. We’ll just monitor his situation, as far as that’s concerned. So, those were the injuries.

    “As we go back and looked at the tape as a staff, a lot of things came to light. We did not have a good day offensively. We had 11 drives and in each of those 11 drives we had an issue, whether it was a sack or penalty or mental error or something. We have to get significantly better there and avoid hurting ourselves. Defensively, there were some bright spots and then there were some tackling issues. I don’t care whether it’s a running back or a wide receiver, you don’t permit him to run 80 yards on a crack-toss for a touchdown. He’s an outstanding athlete, but we were, were not very – to say the least – not very efficient on that particular play. Special teams-wise I thought we did some good stuff. (P) Johnny (Hekker) did a nice job. Our coverage units were good. We were very close, very close as we look at the tape with respect to punt returns and explosive plays there. We went through it and, as you say, very disappointed, but we have the 24-hour rule, it’s in effect. It’s over. Guys are looking forward to the next challenge and correcting these mistakes.”

    (On if Hill will the starting quarterback if he’s healthy)
    “Yes. If Shaun is able to play he will be our starter. There’s no issue there. Shaun’s our quarterback, so if he’s healthy, he starts. That will be the case throughout the season.”

    (On how Hill strained his quad)
    “Typically, quad strains are a result of running. It was not a contusion, it wasn’t impact. It started to get sore, I think, earlier in the game as he was escaping some pressure.”

    (On if he made the decision to pull Hill out of the game or did Hill make it himself)
    “I made the decision with him. We discussed that. We discussed it in the locker room at halftime and then I discussed it after we came back out on the field. He wanted to play but he felt – he was in agreement with me – that the best thing for the immediate future here for the next week or the week to follow would be that he didn’t make it any worse because if you make it any worse, then you’re looking at a significant amount of playing time.”

    (On if Hill was upset about not going back in to play)
    “No, he totally understood. He was not upset. He actually tried to throw that ball away, he wasn’t trying to fit it in to (TE Jared) Cook, the guy (Vikings CB Josh Robinson) made a great play. He was trying to throw it away. You lack the lower body strength to make that throw and that was a concern of his.”

    (On if he has heard anything about him pulling QB Shaun Hill instead of Hill leaving due to an injury)
    “I’ve not heard anything along those lines. I’m telling you the truth. I’ve never messed around with the quarterback situation my entire career. I’m speaking truthfully. He had a quad strain and I took him out of the game, period. On the depth chart, he’s clearly ahead of (QB) Austin Davis. It’s not a negative commentary on Austin, but he gives us the best chance to win. If he can’t go, then Austin steps and then he gives us the best chance to win. That’s absurd.”

    (On if Hill’s practice status for Wednesday is uncertain)
    “That’s correct. I think this will be a day-to-day situation.”

    (On Hill’s performance)
    “Shaun was effective. With the exception of that ball he tried to throw away, he was effective. He made plays. They pressured him. We expected them to pressure him, as anybody would a backup quarterback. But, I thought he was effective. You saw the throws he made, the timing throws that he made. He was under pressure. We had a protection issue. He got hit and was unable to convert one of the third downs. But I thought had he stayed in the game, I thought we would’ve had a chance. Realistically speaking, we’re two plays away from going into the locker room at halftime 6-3. Make a field goal and throw that ball away and punt it away. Even with two minutes left to go in the quarter we’re down 10. One would think you’d have a shot with a veteran quarterback.”

    (On Davis’ performance)
    “Austin, there were several instances where he needs to throw the ball away and not take sack here. He got fooled on the pressure on the interception for a touchdown. There was someone in his face, he didn’t see the safety. Coming in off the bench, having not had a whole lot of reps during the practice week is a difficult thing to do. Especially, when you’re talking about your first real game experience in the National Football League. He’ll get plenty of practice reps this week, he’ll get more. If Shaun can’t practice Wednesday, we’re still going to give him (Davis) more reps just to continue to prepare him.”

    (On why did took some time to get the run game going)
    “Well you’re talking about the first regular season game, you’re talking about a new defensive staff. The ability to adjust, it’s hard to anticipate what they were going to do. They said throw it. It’s what they told us early in the game. They said throw it. They loaded the line of scrimmage. They slanted, they did all kinds of things. They said we’re not going to let you run it. So, we made some adjustments. We got it going. Once we got it going it was a little bit too late.”

    (On the importance of getting WR Kenny Britt more touches)
    “It’s important to get everybody more involved. I want to get (WR) Tavon (Austin) more involved in the offense as well. But this happened to be a day where we had opportunities to get the ball to (WR) Brian (Quick). For the most part, Brian made the plays. He’s not going to get an opportunity when we hand the football off. He did, however, do a nice job blocking. He was in the right place all the time and just one of those things that happened.”

    (On if the Vikings defense tried to take Britt out of the offensive game plan)
    “There was no commitment to that, no. Sometimes coverage rotation will take him, will prevent it from being primary but it doesn’t look like it was intentional.”

    (On OL Jake Long and OL Rodger Saffold’s performances)
    “I talked to Jake after the ball game, late in the locker room and asked him. He said he felt good, he felt good, he was happy to be back. The number of plays wasn’t an issue, you look at his production and the game itself, he did a nice job. I think that’s behind him. Rodger was good. He came out and, when he came out, (OL) Greg (Robinson) went in and Greg played pretty well. I thought Rodger played pretty well. Now, everybody took turns, Rodger had a false start and those kinds of things. That skews things from a coaching perspective, you can do nine out of 10 things right and have a false start in a critical situation and that’s not good. Those are the kinds of things we have to get rid of or overcome.”

    (On former Baltimore RB Ray Rice’s indefinite suspension)
    “It was brought to my attention here about an hour ago, we’ve been busy. Obviously, the actions taken by the league and by the Baltimore Ravens are appropriate, I support them. I will just say this, there’s really no place for domestic violence in society let alone the National Football League. I would support the actions as I would expect everyone else to as well.”

    (On if there’s an internal policy regarding domestic violence)
    “I’m not going to discuss our internal policies, our club rules and things like that. But you can read between the lines.”

    (On the early missed field goal and if he was tempted to go on fourth-and-one)
    “I was It was fourth-and-one-and-a half, I was. Prior to that I was thinking, well if we got to five-to- six then we’re well in Greg’s (Zuerlein) range and then we would go ahead and take a shot. Once we got the fourth-and-one-and- a half I was. I also felt like the game was kind of taking shape as it might be one of those, 13-10 games. I felt like at that point it was well within his range and I felt like we needed points. You can always come back and second guess your decision, but I felt like that was the right decision at the time.”

    (Does over exuberance play into mistakes)
    “No.”

    (On Minnesota’s ability to attack the perimeter of the defense and how he will adjust)
    “We have to do a better job up front setting the edges. We had people running behind blocks, not crossing over. On a couple plays we had poor angles out of the secondary. We also had an alignment era on the long touchdown run. We’re going to have to continue work at that and we’ll get that fixed. (Defensive Coordinator) Gregg (Williams) is very much aware of it and not happy right now, so we’ll get it fixed.”

    (On bright spots in the defensive performances)
    “First off, the guys played really hard, they flew around. I thought (CB) E.J. (Gaines) did a nice job starting his first game in the National Football League as a rookie. I thought he hung in there and did a nice job, it was a perfect throw and catch. We’d like to see him make that play, however it didn’t happen. But I thought E.J. was a bright spot. (S) T.J (McDonald) made some plays, had a couple misses but everybody’s going to have misses in space with ‘AP’ (Vikings RB Adrian Peterson). But I thought T.J. played better than he played at any time last year. (DT) Aaron (Donald) did some good things inside, he got good some pressure. Had a couple tackles for losses, there was some good things all-in-all but again, not a good enough effort to win.”

    (On if DE Will Hayes will start if DE Chris Long cannot play)
    “If for some reason Chris would miss time, yeah, Will would step up and start.”

    (On how Hayes looked)
    “Will was fine. Will hadn’t played a whole lot in the preseason. The injuries are behind him now.”

    (On the decision behind not activating RB Tre Mason being inactive and activiating Trey Watts)
    “It was special teams. Trey Watts was doing more. Not that Tre (Mason) can’t, but Trey Watts was doing more on special teams standpoint, from a backup stand point, kickoff coverage, kickoff return, personal protector and those things. You can’t keep them all up. Tre (Mason) was a little surprised, doesn’t like it and was the first one upstairs in the special team’s coaches office this morning.”

    (On S Maurice Alexander)
    “We kept four safeties and I’ve got five corners up. He’s doing a nice job, but I would trust the other two to play defense prior to him right now.”

    in reply to: Ray Rice suspended cut by Ravens, Suspended indefinitely by NFL #6719
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Word is that Harvey Levin is going to come out that the NFL and specifically Goodell knew about that tape.

    ——-

    TMZ’s Harvey Levin: NFL knew newly-released Ray Rice elevator video existed

    http://www.myfoxdc.com/clip/10562403/tmzs-harvey-levin-talks-to-fox-5-about-new-ray-rice-elevator-video

    It’s the talk of the town on TMZ. Baltimore Ravens running back Ray rice allegedly caught on camera punching his then-fiancee in the head in an elevator knocking her unconscious. TMZ was the first to release the video and TMZ’s Harvey Levin joined us on FOX 5 to talk about it.

    —-

    TMZ Producer Says NFL Knew About Shocking Ray Rice Video, Promises Bombshell Report

    Erin Fuchs

    Sep. 8, 2014, 8:55 PM

    http://www.businessinsider.com/harvey-levin-says-nfl-knew-ray-rice-tape-existed-2014-9#ixzz3Cn3PqtSi

    In this May 23, 2014, file photo, Janay Rice, left, looks on as her husband, Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice, speaks to the media during a news conference in Owings Mills, Md.

    An executive producer for TMZ — which published disturbing video of NFL player Ray Rice knocking his then-fiancee unconscious — said Monday he believes the league knew about the footage before the public saw it.

    In an interview with Fox, Harvey Levin said he believes the NFL “turned a blind eye” to the video of Rice beating his now-wife, Janay Rice, in an elevator. Earlier on Monday, the NFL said it did not see the footage of Rice beating Janay before Monday. The NFL says it requested that video from law enforcement but never got it.

    For his part, Levin did not say in the Fox news clip that the NFL had actually seen the video. Rather, he said the NFL knew that it was out there — a fact the NFL didn’t seem to contradict in its statement Monday.

    “It’s a shameful story that the NFL knew that the surveillance video existed,” Levin said. It was “no secret,” he added, that Rice had to pull his fiancee out of an elevator because he’d knocked her unconscious.

    Levin did not provide any evidence that the NFL flagrantly ignored the videotape, but he suggested he would do so on Tuesday in TMZ.

    “When you wake up tomorrow and go to the website, our website … you will see what the NFL didn’t do,” he said.

    The NFL was widely criticized for initially suspending Rice for just two games after his alleged assault. Following the release of the video Monday, the Baltimore Ravens cut Rice and the NFL suspended him indefinitely.

    in reply to: Ray Rice suspended cut by Ravens, Suspended indefinitely by NFL #6712
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jason La Canfora @JasonLaCanfora
    If TMZ can prove NFL in fact had opportunity to view tapes, and declined, then that’s a potential game changer. Credibility in balance

    in reply to: MMQB Peter King #6711
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I thought the Minnesota game was the “easy” one among the first ten games. And they got crushed. I honestly believe that they have a real shot at an 0-10 start and I believe it has a real chance to get real ugly along the way. I guess if I see something positive, it’s that the Rams might find themselves in the Jameis Winston sweepstakes. Of course, if Winston thinks he might be sentenced to a career in St. Louis, he might just stay in college.

    I dunno. I am not sure it’s true the Vikes game was just supposed to be easy. Zimmer is a good D coach and that was a veteran defense. Turner can use the weapons they had, not an issue.

    in reply to: Was anyone surprised? #6710
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Herzog wrote:
    I still believe we can do a complete 180 turn around….but I am also perplexed at the lack of readiness of this team.

    Well, let’s just hope we don’t get overzealous and do a 360…

    They could do a 540.

    That would be fine with me.

    in reply to: we spend real time money, not prorated money #6709
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from last April

    http://www.ramsrule.com/herd/list.php?13

    Kevin Demoff

    This question is a little easier to answer this year as it appears the next few years should seem at least modest increases in the salary cap. In previous years, with more uncertainty around how the salary cap would rise, we always expected an increase of about $1-2m per year. While we still use very conservative estimates for future years, I think we can plan for $3-5m per year for the forseeable future which is helpful because we always look at our salary cap planning in 3-4 year increments.

    The most important thing we value as a franchise in our salary cap is flexiblity. The best way to preserve that flexibility is to try and write contracts that are linear meaning that the contracts are roughly the same value each year and don’t contain large pro-rated signing bonuses. With most of our bigger signings, be it our own re-signings or free agency, we try to write the contracts where the guaranteed money is in the first 2 years and then there is greater room to manuever after that. That structure is what you have seen most recently in contracts such as Chris Long, James Laurinaitis, Cortland Finnegan, Scott Wells, Kendall Langford, Rodger Saffold, etc…

    Ideally we like to write those guarantees in base salaries and roster bonuses, but we also are willing usually to commit $1m/year in signing bonus proration if it helps us afford a player in a given year. Typically our contracts can be structured to be slightly lower in the first year cap wise and then slightly higher in the second year to give us more flexibility in the current year we are in. The goal is to have nearly complete flexibility after the first two years of a contract.

    As for coming up with values on players, myself and Tony Pastoors, our senior assistant who manages the salary cap and plays a significant role in our front office, we will sit with the coaches and scouts to get a sense of their needs/wants in any given year. We will then sit with Coach Fisher and Les Snead to develop a strategic plan of the players or groups of players that we would like to go after and an “ideal” range that we would like to sign a player for. There is always some flexibility in that range, but we usually have an idea of a number we won’t go past in any negotiation. If a player goes past our range, we wil consider the next best alternative to sign, although sometimes that player isn’t at the same position.

    As for our current situation, we have tried to manage our salary cap from the vantage point that we have the youngest team in the NFL and our young players are going to need to be paid in the next few years. As a result, we have tried to leave greater flexibility and room in the 2015-2018 years and as a result, we have taken higher “cap” charges for our veterans in 2012-2014 when the young players are on rookie contracts. We have tried to avoid the restructuring contracts for salary cap purposes only and have succeeded for the most part with one exception, which was Chris Long last year.

    One last thing that I think is helpful to understand our cap situation. I don’t think we will ever be a team that has the most “room” in the NFL the way we look at contracts, but the fact that may be closer to the cap can also be misleading. We have one of the lowest amounts of signing bonus proration in the NFL both now and moving forward, which means our cap dollars are all in salary cap space that can be converted if necessary. Our goal is to always have salary cap options, not just room. But moving forward, we have both room and options and that will be imperative as we try to lock up our young core.

    Honestly, we don’t really look as much by unit as people may think, we tend to look at in terms of offense/defense and starters/backups. With such a young team that has so many players on rookie contracts, the units can get skewed fairly quickly. Also, for the most part, we have not found any historical correlation between winning % and dollars spent on a certain position group. However, we do want to be fairly balanced between offense and defense. It is not a must have, but something we do monitor to make sure our dollars are allocated somewhat evenly.

    One area which we have studied historically is the % of dollars that are going to starters versus non starters. Ideally you would like to be in the 65-75% range for starters, and your team can get a little top heavy at over 80%. But again, given how young we are and how many of our players are on rookie deals, that hasn’t been a ratio we have paid as much attention to, especially as we have gotten away from signing bonus and focus more heavily on salary and roster bonuses.

    The goal though is to use our $133m the most efficiently that we can to get the best possible players. If that means getting out of whack in some spots but it makes us better, we will do what is best for the roster, not just what fits our models the best.


    I don’t think we will ever be a team that has the most “room” in the NFL the way we look at contracts, but the fact that may be closer to the cap can also be misleading. We have one of the lowest amounts of signing bonus proration in the NFL both now and moving forward, which means our cap dollars are all in salary cap space that can be converted if necessary. Our goal is to always have salary cap options, not just room.

    Okay that means this.

    1. They frontload.

    2. They try to maximize the frontloading, but that is flexible. They can un-do it a little when they need to. So for example it looks like they spent to the cap this year, but the truth is, the contracts are set up in such a way that they can change that easily and on short notice. What that does is create a little more space THIS year but subtract a bit from the open space they left in future years. They can trade back and forth on that.

    3. That means they will LOOK like they are tight against the cap any given year, but that’s in appearance only…any time they need more space, it’s there. They simply have to re-structure someone so that they trade space now for future space.

    4. It’s like you put all your money into savings, and only an allowance in checking. Let’s say this month the allowance isn’t workable because something comes up. You just put a little less in savings THIS ONE TIME, without overdoing it. It works exactly like that.

    in reply to: Fisher, 9/08 – video & transcript #6704
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    RustyRay

    11 drives and every single of them had a penalty or a sack or a mental error…

    Defense missed way too many tackles.

    Almost hit a few returns, he though special teams were good and close to making big plays.

    The quad strain is for real…it wasnt some made up injury. Hill is the starter and it isnt close in terms of the depth chart. “Its absurd” is what CJF said.

    Should have been 6-3 at the half they didnt play well on O. Only down 10 with 2 minutes left in the 3rd.

    Greg Robinson sulking? No he was not pouting….He was standing by himself…Fisher has no idea….Robinson wasnt pouting.

    Running game got going in the second half why did it take so long. Vikings dared them to pass it early….they did.. Made some adjustments at HT for the Running game…too late.

    Need to get Tavon more involved. Britt did a good job of blocking and he was in the right place every time and this happens. Quick did well.

    Jake Long feels good and happy to be back. Fisher said he played well. Saffold played pretty well. Robinson played well when he went in. All of them took turns making mistakes however. Robinson didnt make any errors.

    Commented on the Ray Rice garbage…Supports what the decision was today…and the Rams policy on it…he wont discuss the internal Rams policies…Tells the reporter to read between the lines.

    Thought about going for it on the 4th and 1 says it was 1.5 yards to go…thought the game was looking like a 13-10 type game…they needed points…well within GZ range.

    Talked about the Rams getting pinned on the corners on D….Did set the edge…people running behind blocks…poor angles from the seconday…Allignment error on the long TD. (shocker) watch the replay Long is the DE and has 2 or 3 Vikings outside of him…with a LB and a DB out there….it was set up for huge failure…like the Rams lined up perfect for that play call…my take..

    The team played hard and flew around. EJ Gaines played hard…should have made the play on the TD. He was a bright spot however. TJ played well and better then last year.

    Donald played well inside. Not a good enough effort to win. Greg is not happy about it and they are aware of the errors and will get it fixed.

    in reply to: Green Bay's qb story in 2013 (ie qbs are hard to find) #6697
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    In training camp, the Packers decided that they were not happy with the development of either Graham Harrell or B.J. Coleman, and they decided to bring in veteran Vince Young.

    When all was said and done however, the Packers didn’t keep any of their training camp quarterbacks, and instead signed veteran Seneca Wallace to be the main backup to Rodgers. The Packers also signed former Wisconsin Badger quarterback Scott Tolzien to the practice squad.

    Then just a week after Rodgers was injured, Wallace also was sidelined with a groin injury. That made Tolzien the starter, as he had been elevated to the roster after the collarbone injury to Rodgers. The Packers also brought back Flynn to backup Tolzien, as Wallace was placed on injured reserve.

    All this seems pertinent now.

    in reply to: Rewind – Rams v Vikings #6696
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Yeah, this is a dangerous team on Defense. With the QB situation
    being the way it is, it could be a very long year,
    and the D is gonna get worn down…and thats too bad,
    cause they would be fun to watch if the O was even average.

    I thought Norv called a good game, btw. I got
    no complaints about him.

    w
    v

    Well it’s good to get the perspective of a Vikings fan. We welcome all views here. Though you should know that Norv Turner is a Rams product. It’s John Robinson who first brought him to the pros.

    Anyway, I don’t think the offense is doomed…when Hill is healthy.

    Maybe game planning for what Davis can do helps. We shall see.

    Fisher sacrifices short term for long term. He wanted the OL to be rested and healthy. Well…now…they need to play together like a good OL.

    But even with some OL issues early against a defense stacking up to stop the run, I thought Hill could play. I still think it. He just needs to be healthy.

    Remember older debates where people would say, basically, even Fisher can’t make a team win if it has multiple injuries? Like for example…the top 2 qbs. And that would get scoffed at? Maybe what happened is bad karma for people scoffing at that…..

    in reply to: Was anyone surprised? #6685
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Well…respectfully, I see it all differently. Or almost all of it. We’re just in different places with all of this.

    in reply to: Rewind – Rams v Vikings #6679
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    That’s a very solid take IMO. It’s basically what I saw. This was a tough close game punctuated the wrong way by Rams mistakes. The 2nd half? They sent in an inexperienced 3rd qb to take over with the team behind. That;s what happens when you do that.

    in reply to: Dreadnoughtus #6640
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/05/science/dinosaur-dreadnoughtus-discovery.html?_r=1

    Not a first round pick. Slow feet. Some red flag issues off-campus.

    in reply to: Shall we talk draft? The vikes game post-mortem #6635
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The way Fisher threw Quick under the bus p

    I’m not sure what that refers to. Since game 1 in 2012, Fisher has been openly critical of players who need to fix something or step up. I remember last year when he was discussing run defense, he went on for a minute or so about how Langford was playing out of position. Oh and btw, in the wake of that, the Rams run defense DID get fixed. When he does that I just see him as being a teacher type. So I don’t see him rightfully criticizing a player for an error as a “meltdown.” It’s just the way he has always been. This goes back years in Tennessee.

    I don’t see any owner delivering an ultimatum like that, btw.

    in reply to: Prediction. Rams will win next Sunday in Tampa #6631
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I have a very different take on the Minn game than most.

    First, I think they were fine with Hill, except for miscues and mistakes (Stacy’s drop, Quick’s penalty, and so on). That was a tough close game until Hill went out. No team wins game 1 if they are playing their 3rd qb, no matter who it is.

    This team has annual meltdowns and inexplicable losses. The Jets and Patz in 2012, the SF and Dallas games in 2013. It ALSO balances it out with tough unexpected wins. Both SF games in 2012 (though 1 of those was a tie of course), the Saints and Colts games in 2013.

    I don’t see the Minn loss as anything that unusual, once you factor in playing your 3rd qb.

    The Tampa game ought to go as scheduled. They’ve already beaten Tampa, and that was with Clemens. If Hill plays they ought to beat Tampa again.

    If Davis plays, who knows. It would be a rough game and then many people will blame the coordinator and coach and GM for that…even though (IMO) I have no idea who would win a game starting their 3rd qb in week 2.

Viewing 30 posts - 45,991 through 46,020 (of 46,996 total)