Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 45,511 through 45,540 (of 47,899 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Anyone giving Seattle a chance over Carolina? #16195
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from off the net
    ==

    RLA314

    Carolina=Rams D are very similar

    Alot of people are counting out Carolina in Seattle which in no surprise but Carolina matches up well with Seattle. Their games are all about defense and hard mouth football. Just like our games between Seattle. Carolina’s defense is almost a clone to ours. They don’t blitz as much as us but their D-line gets to the QB just like ours. And both of our LB cores get the football fast. And both of our secondaries are similar, no studs but decent enough to do the job. The only difference is that they have Kuechly which is a fuc#in stud. Hands down the best MLB in the league. Anyways expect this to be a low scoring game and close by the way.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    You know I have been thinking about this KS angle.

    He WILL bring that stretch/zone-blocking offense with him, and it does gain yards. Denver with Shanahan sr., Houston with Kubiak, now Baltimore with Kubiak. Even a couple of years in Washington (1st in rushing in 2012, 5th in 2013).

    Now some minutia stuff.

    I don’t know about Boudreau coaching it. I think I remember that he doesn’t lean toward it. But then who knows.

    Also…interesting thing. This kind of running game favors smaller, more athletic O-linemen. Well, what about doing it with BIGGER more athletic linemen? LIke Robinson and Saffold. Saffold is prized for his pulling as a guard…how far is that from playing in this kind of offense?

    Here’s something on it with a lot of pics. I don’t post it just link it cause pics pics pics.

    An introduction to the Gary Kubiak offense

    http://baltimoresportsandlife.com/baltimore-ravens/introduction-gary-kubiak-offense/

    Football is back and the Baltimore Ravens have a new offense to acclimatize to. New offensive coordinator Gary Kubiak has installed his version of the west coast offense passing game combined with the zone-blocking scheme. While we only saw the Ravens starters for one series in their opening preseason game last week, we did get a glimpse of what is to come from the new system.

    The foundation of Kubiak’s offense is the zone running game. Every team in the NFL will mix between power and zone running schemes, but Kubiak comes from the Mike Shanahan coaching tree that uses almost exclusively zone blocking.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    first in offense
    those two years in NY.

    You never studied.

    in reply to: best qbs in 2014? #16192
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think Flacco is the most underrated QB in the league.

    Flacco is clutch when they have the running game and OL

    Or…Flacco HAS BEEN clutch in those circumstances.

    Mostly.

    Not completely entirely. To a complete and full extent.

    So it seems. s

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t know why this hasn’t occurred to anyone yet.

    But all of this is pretty clearly Bulger’s fault.

    Yeah I know, sometimes the obvious answer is the hardest to find.

    in reply to: Lame duck year #16188
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But this team? It has yet to learn how to play competitively.

    Explore. Explain. Develop. s

    That is, you use that word “competitively” a lot, and I think you and I mean different things by it. Or there are nuance-level differences. But that’s neither here nor there, that I might differ in how I use it…it just leads me to ask what you mean by it.

    I am not debating or disagreeing. Just expressing basic curiosity.

    Others can chime in too…what do people mean when they say a team knows how to play competitively? What does that look like, what does it consist of?

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    But then the Jacksonville fans
    are screwed.

    Cant you think of a win, win, win
    solution?

    w
    v

    Yes that;s it right there.

    in reply to: Anyone giving Seattle a chance over Carolina? #16168
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    if you watch the game watch the Ravens running attack

    That;s Kubiak. He’s the Baltimore OC. Kubiak runs that zone-blocking scheme he got from Shanahan Sr in Denver. Kyle (who is of course an OC candidate) inherited that scheme from Dad. In fact, for a few years there, Kyle was Kubiak’s OC in Houston.

    If they hire KS it will be that offense.

    Oh and btw last year the Ravens OL was a mess. They both fixed the OL (and not expensively) and changed the offense in one year. And here they are. Those kinds of things don’t have to be setbacks. Not with a veteran qb.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Maybe there’s a double-secret deal or at least
    winks-and-nods to the St.Louis folks that they
    will be first in line for the next expansion team
    if the Rams leave.

    There hasn’t been any expansion talk. Besides…that would make the divisions lop-sided. Cant be having lopsided divisions.

    I think St. Louis would be getting the Jagz. Or at least there would be some efforts in that direction.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Steven Gerwel ‏@Steve_Ger 22m22 minutes ago
    Shanahan mini has 3 top5 & 4 top10 offenses in his 6 yrs as coordinator. Never finished below 18th. Meanwhile Schotty has excuses. #Rams 2/2

    I think the “excuses” mantra always just means the person using it is just not going to be making a good argument.

    Numbers out of context are meaningless. Anyone who would judge a coordinator just on season averages alone is just deliberately avoiding looking at the context.

    Cause then if they did I could challenge them.

    I could say, name coordinators who did well in terms of season avg offensive rankings who had both a beat-up OL and backup caliber qbs.

    If you can’t name examples, the idea that that is an “excuse” obviously looks like bs. Cause it’s just an unreal expectation that is never met in reality.

    Speaking of context, the Cleveland offense last year was 23rd, which is below 18th. Now what are KS’s “excuses” in Cleveland? Oh yeah qb issues. (And that’s in spite of having a top OL.) Sound familiar? Funny how that works.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Kroenke should build the stadium in LA and lease it to the Chargers and Raiders while keeping the Rams in St. Louis until the day he sells the Rams to be able to buy the Broncos to have a monopoly of pro sports in Denver. Then he could spend more time in Aspen.

    Depends. Can you own a stadium in one city and a team in another. Isn’t leasing to another team basically a danger-fraught situation that raises all sorts of competitive advantage issues?

    St.Louis Rams are playing the Chargers in LA. Suddenly that week there’s an issue with groundskeeping. Coincidentally. Etc.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    but also, zn. there were rules in place before that supposedly prevented teams from moving and they still moved. so am i now to believe that these new rules will actually prohibit them from moving? again maybe they will. but not for a move to los angeles. yes. a move to san antonio. to orlando. but not los angeles. i firmly believe that.

    No they did not have the same rules. The old rules gave them no enforcement power and no spelled-out consequences. That’s precisely what they added. If you violate those rules and the league doesn’t approve your move, you can get royally screwed. The option would be to leave the NFL entirely and start your own league.

    So given the heavy enforcement power they gave themselves, the real question is whether the league will approve it, thereby making enforcement stuff kind of irrelevant. If you’re approved then obviously you didn’t move without approval.

    Will he be approved? That really depends. It’s no more clearcut than anything else in this. Truth is…we don’t know on that. We’re all speculating when it comes to that part of it.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I don’t think either of those hold up, especially if you’re looking at contesting that in a court.

    That’s where none of us know but it’s fair to speculate.

    In terms of the court though…no. Nothing won’t hold up in court, because these are league-instituted rules internally governing a sports league. YOu sign on to those when you buy a team and not everyone just has a right to own a team in the NFL. They vet ownership. It is not free enterprise in the ordinary sense of that.

    The internal governing of a league through shared and transparent rules is not something you can blow up in court….UNLESS you also want to jeopardize the league’s exemption from anti-trust law. Which would bugger them beyond belief.

    So regardless what happens…the “won’t hold up in court” thing has nothing to do with it. The league is an association of owners with agreed upon internal rules governing ownership. Heck they even have the power to suspend a given owner (Irsay). The courts don’t apply here.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams seek interviews with Kyle Shanahan, Greg Roman

    By Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/15378/rams-seek-interviews-with-kyle-shanahan-greg-roman

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — The St. Louis Rams have officially dived into the pool of available offensive coordinator candidates.

    According to ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter, the Rams have requested permission to interview in-limbo San Francisco 49ers offensive coordinator Greg Roman and former Cleveland Browns offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan for their open offensive coordinator position. Neither name should come as much of a surprise, and both occupied spots on the initial list I posted after Brian Schottenheimer departed for Georgia’s offensive coordinator position.

    Shanahan has close ties to Rams coach Jeff Fisher. Mike Shanahan and Fisher are close friends, and Kyle is Mike’s son. Fisher and Kyle Shanahan have known each other for a long time, and Shanahan would be a fit philosophically for what Fisher wants his offense to be.

    After Shanahan asked out of his contract with the Browns this week, his name immediately popped up in a variety of places. He interviewed for the Buffalo Bills head coaching job on Thursday, and his name has been brought up as the likely coordinator choice for Seattle defensive coordinator Dan Quinn, should Quinn land a head coaching job, which seems most likely in San Francisco or with the New York Jets. In other words, the Rams figure to have plenty of competition for Shanahan’s services should Fisher want to bring him on board.

    As for Roman, he might be the candidate that makes the most sense from a pure football perspective. He is well respected by Rams defenders, who have tried to defend his running game in recent years, and his offense’s success with the ground game and lack of turnovers would seem to appeal to Fisher’s preferred offensive approach. Roman’s San Francisco offenses have finished in the top four in rushing in each of the past four season. It also doesn’t hurt than Roman is familiar with the NFC West and would be able to hit the ground running in terms of preparation for games against Seattle, San Francisco and Arizona.

    Like with Shanahan, the Rams face plenty of competition for Roman. He’s technically still under contract with the 49ers, but after Jim Harbaugh’s departure, San Francisco has allowed Roman to explore other opportunities. He’s already interviewed for Tampa Bay’s vacancy (since filled by Dirk Koetter), the Buffalo head coaching position, and is scheduled to interview for Jacksonville’s coordinator opening on Saturday. Cleveland has also sought an interview with Roman.

    But it’s possible Roman might never make it out of Jacksonville. His ties to Jaguars general manager Dave Caldwell run deep, as the pair were teammates and roommates at John Carroll University.

    Fisher has generally moved slower on such hires, but with names like Shanahan and Roman drawing plenty of interest elsewhere, it’s possible something could materialize faster this time around.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    but in the end what happened after those teams moved? a slap on the wrist?

    What happened after those teams moved is that the league responded to rogue moves like that by building in rules to prevent it.

    In other words, precisely because they had no recourse before, they built in recourse.

    So let’s say there’s no law against stealing cars. Cars get stolen. So they pass laws against stealing cars. You can’t then say that stealing cars is okay because before, nothing happened to you if you did it. They reacted to that situation by passing laws against it.

    It was precisely because they had nothing but wrist slaps BEFORE that they built in rules giving them enforcement power NOW.

    You know that, for one thing, a team that moves without league approval can then be denied any access to the tv contract revenue. And that’s among other things they can do. So they are F-ing serious about that.

    Now the issue is, will the league give SK approval? That’s where we get into the fine print.

    For example, the rules demand that you make a fair effort to negotiate with the local market before moving, AND you can’t move just to get richer.

    Now it’s pretty obvious that SK completely ignored the “fair effort” part of it, though he did try to crassly manipulate the situation to set up a “too little too late” case.

    It depends on whether the league believes in its own rules, and how much, and whether or not they are willing to live with the obvious “SK is an exception” thing. In other words, whether or not they will countenance obvious hypocrisy in the name of expedience for something they like.

    And maybe not everyone will do that. They only need 9 to block it.

    in reply to: Back to LA, again #16108
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    60 percent of ticket sales go to the home team and the remaining 40 percent goes to the revenue pool. In the new deal, a 10 percent local revenue tax on organizations considered to be large market teams has been added.

    Good find, that article.

    Anyway let;s look at whether or not the LEAGUE gets money from luxury boxes.

    Let;s pretend that the luxury box sales in LA are around 138 M, a figure already mentioned in this discussion.

    The league gets 40% of that, or 55.2 M. If I read it right, they also get a 10% tax on big market revenues. So that’s 10% of 60% which is another 8.3 M (appx). So the league gets 63.5 M, and that’s split among 31 teams, which is 2 M each, give or take.

    Which just drives home the point that the league does not benefit financially from a move.

    It doesn’t hurt them either.

    But it just means increased league revenue will not be an argument FOR league approval.

    In comparison each team gets around 180 something M from the tv contracts.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Whats the downside? Why would owners vote against it?

    It’s 1. losing a team in St. Louis, which they don’t prize as an outcome, and 2. whether or not they meant it when they put up barriers to lone owner moves of the Cleveland to Baltimore, Baltimore to IND type.

    If #2 no longer means anything to them, then, so be it. But then why are those rules THERE.

    Cause they are not going to have an easy time arguing that those rules are there for a reason except when it comes to Stan Kroenke. Even a socio-pathic billionaire team owner is going to notice the problems with that argument.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    BUT…to be fair…the whole arbitration and Rams presentation and plans for renovations 2 yrs ago….

    The process had steps. The first step was to see if the Dome could be renovated. The next step, when that got canned, was to invent a stadium. You don’t do that overnight.

    I think there is absolutely nothing to the “too little too late” argument, and if anything, it looks like SK is just disingenuously jerking things around in a transparent attempt to try to set up that argument. (Including the timing of his announcement about the LA stadium plan.) Looks to me like it’s much more accurate to say he never negotiated in good faith. In fact, absolutely cynically did not and never had any intention to.

    Looks to me like his one sole concern is to build value into his property, the team, and that that completely overshadows any other consideration. That the way he does things is to play along with the appearance of the letter of the rules (while also manipulating them) while fundamentally not caring in the least about the spirit of the rules.

    This has nothing to do with whether or not they will move, whether the league goes along with it, and whether or not it’s a good thing.

    I just see the “too little too late” argument and see nothing in it on SK’s part but crass and transparent manipulation.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    you don’t get numerous proposals of stadium projects because they weren’t serious about it.

    But you also didn’t get stadiums.

    So how serious were they.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    It is part of a process. Everyone eventually will get a call. Heck, Fisher might be on our phones wanting to talk to some of us of our offensive system. Just kidding of course. But it is standard to talk to people and to fit what Fisher wants to do. Whoever comes in here, will have to run the offense that Fisher wants.

    Which means as a rule, he’s interviewing people who already fit that profile.

    Which raises interesting questions about KS. Kyle Shanahan is not going to abandon zone-blocking running schemes. It’s who he is. Same with Kubiak, same with Shanahan Sr. That would be like asking Martz to run a ground and pound Seattle running attack while being 32nd in the league in passing attempts. So if Fisher is approaching KS, it means Fisher is open to that kind of change. Whether Boudreau wants to do it is another issue entirely.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    don’t see why the nfl would be against this move.

    Well the argument for them possibly being against it is to be found in their own relocation rules, which they put in place as a response to precisely this kind of thing (Cleveland to Baltimore, Baltimore to IND etc.) They didn’t want that then…meaning, not teams moving, but teams moving whenever ever they felt like it without a league-wide approval process etc.

    Now if they violate their own rules they are setting it up to encourage more teams to do the same, which is precisely what they set out to avoid.

    In terms of being in LA, in a lot of ways, having no team in LA is just as viable for the league as a whole. It means every NFL fan in LA watches NFL games every Sunday, just lots of different games. Having a team there doesn’t change that. It doesn’t increase revenue one bit. It might be nice to have a showy stadium in LA…I think that’s hopelessly superficial myself and kind of like wishing for the wrong things…but then that has to balance with whether or not they prize their own rules.

    Now it’s clear why Stan wants to move. His one abiding concern is “increasing value” which trumps absolutely everything else. Personally I don’t admire those characteristics. In fact I think they’re socio-pathic. (Really, I do.) So we know why Stan needs to own the biggest and brightest. But that does not automatically mean everyone in the league prizes that over other considerations. I might mean that in the long run…but it’s not a slamdunk that it means that.

    So there’s lots to unfold yet here, and lots to talk about still.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I know Zooey…that was all in my imagination! LOL

    Call me a forward thinker…or simply, delusional ;)
    but THAT is what I think the NFL will do with those 300 acres…in a short time,
    when they realize what’s possible – if they haven’t already and that’s why they are so quiet!
    The NFL is pinching itself! Corporations can pinch…right?
    Corps are people too, ya know!! ;)

    Well you’re obviously pro LA. I am a nomad and neutral. I don’t even know personally what I prefer.

    BUT a lot of things you say are a little too pro LA. You assume for example that the league is quiet because it approves. It’s just as likely that the league is quiet because this just got sprung on them. You assume the Peacock thing is too little too late. I don’t know why it’s too little, but it is as early as it could be–once the EJD negotiations went the way they did, the state dedicated itself to having a plan, and those are NOT done overnight. So arguably the St. Louis plan shows up the soonest it ever possible COULD show up. In fact, it is quite likely that Stan made his LA stadium issue public when he did in order to undermine the St. Louis presentation, and that he did that precisely to TRY and make the “too little too late” case, when in fact him doing that could just as easily be taken as backing the “he never made an honest effort to deal with St. Louis” case. (Actually I think it is far, far more the latter.) You also assume that the league is greedy to have this model park in LA to the point where they are eager to overlook their own rules about relocation. Those rules exist for a reason–they came in place in response to all the franchise moves of the 80s and 90s. If they ignore their own rules they are inviting franchise free agency where anyone can move. That’s precisely what those rules responded to…that environment, which the league did NOT want.

    Now I don;t know what will happen, and what the league is thinking, and so on.

    I am just responding to a couple of arguments you make that strike me as a bit “pro-LA”-ish and not necessarily givens or solid or sound as arguments.

    I do this only because of my deep abiding grudge against you personally, after years of mutual bitter board wars between us two.

    Or wait…was that someone else?

    Naw just speaking as a nomad. There is a lot of this that is still unclear. You make the LA case, which is fine, but it IS the LA case and not necessarily a neutral reading. Which is also fine.

    Lots to discuss as this unfolds across the next several decades.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What system? That’s the only thing I care about in this hunt. What system was he running? What system are any of ‘em running?

    Both Shanahan and Roman run WCOs. Bradford spent 2 years in a WCO, of course (Shurmur).

    My guess is that Roman is more of a “adapt to what they have” kind of coordinator, while KS shows up with the Daddy Shanahan running game concepts, and is more of a “adapt to my system” kind of coach, at least in terms of the running game.

    Without knowing much more about them, I do know they differ in this respect.

    Roman, with SF, was obviously getting a lot of success with read option stuff programmed in with CK. Though, Smith played well for him too. In the 9 games he played in 2012, Smith completed 70.2% of his passes for 8.0 an attempt, had a 6.0% TD percentage, a 2.3% INT percentage, and a qb rating of 104.1. The TD percentage, completion percentage, and qb rating are all the best of his career.

    I know another thing about the SF offense. It is said, rightly, that Schott’s passing scheme was complicated because it built in so many sight adjustments (MCD was the same way). It takes rookie WRs a while to adapt to that because sight adjustments means reading the defense pre-snap, and college receivers never have to do that. Well, in SF, Harbaugh made a big deal about not using sight adjustments. I don’t know if that was because of Roman, or if Roman liked that, or whatever. But it is at least 1 possible difference between Roman and Schott.

    Shanahan I know less about in general but he does run the zone blocking running scheme his father lived off of. That would mean a big transformation in how the OL plays. But then Baltimore, which made the same switch for this season under Kubiak (a Shanahan the elder’s disciple), made that work for this season. Baltimore is 8th in rushing yards this year with Justin Forsett as their feature back. So there’s a lot to be said for that scheme though it is also utterly different from anything this OL and Boudreau have done before. But thats; the scheme. IN Cleveland, with Kyle, they were 17th in rushing yards in spite of being 6th in attempts, but then their primary backs were Terrance West and Isaiah Crowell.

    Personally I prefer Roman, but then, he is probably the hotter commodity on the market.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    49ers’ Greg Roman in tough position

    By Tim Kawakami

    Mercury News Columnist

    http://www.mercurynews.com/tim-kawakami/ci_24840283/kawakami-49ers-greg-roman-tough-position?source=infinite

    SANTA CLARA — Inside the 49ers bunker, offensive coordinator Greg Roman is a reliable constant, an even-keel, thoughtful, unquestionably valuable member of Jim Harbaugh’s joint chiefs of staff.

    To the outside world, though? That’s where the perception of Roman gets a little skewed and confusing.

    In national football circles, Roman, 41, is widely considered to be a top potential head-coaching candidate, with college (Penn State) or NFL (Detroit or Minnesota) teams possibly jockeying for interview position.

    But to a persistent, rabid percentage of 49ers fans, Roman is a bête noire, personally at fault for most of the offensive misfires up to and maybe including Sunday’s upcoming NFC wild-card game in Green Bay.

    “That’s life in the big city,” Roman said with a smile. “That’s part of it. You signed up for it.

    “Whether it’s right, wrong, indifferent, people are going to be passionate — especially in San Francisco — about the offense, with the rich history here.

    “I get that. People love the team, there’s so much support for it, so much passion for it. They want high standards and we do, too.”

    It’s what happens to high-profile play-callers on big-time teams, only with Roman it seems to be pushed to the far extremes.

    Outside executives just admire the 49ers’ physical, layered offensive style and cohesive game plans, the resurrection of Alex Smith’s career in 2011 and the near-seamless transition to Colin Kaepernick.

    But many 49ers fans can’t bring themselves to fault Harbaugh for anything, don’t want to single out Kaepernick, and yearn for the team to score 40 points a game, anyway.

    It’s a thin line any coordinator in such a high-profile situation has to walk.

    I’ll say this: Roman seems particularly adept at handling the heady mix of Harbaugh input, outside respect and occasional local raspberries.

    The 49ers’ offense, no question, has had its struggles this season, as Kaepernick has gone up and down and some of the top weapons have worked through injuries.

    And yes, there have been moments when Roman’s play calls and game plans have seemed less than innovative.

    But the 49ers are, ahem, in the playoffs for the third season in a row, with some shot at getting back to the Super Bowl for a second consecutive season.

    Not to impress prospective Roman employers, but to win big games. That’s the goal, and everything else comes from that.

    “I’m totally focused in on this game,” Roman said when I asked about potential head-coaching interviews. “I’m really dug in on this game.

    “I have somebody that handles that stuff for me; it’s just not something I’m thinking about.”

    Roman says there’s no reason to try to bolt this great spot with the 49ers, but says at some point, yes, he does want to be a head coach. In the right spot, at the right time.

    “Oh, there’s no question,” Roman said. “I’m very competitive and definitely want to do that …

    “I love my job here. In the right situation, (being a head coach is) a lifelong pursuit.”

    With the 49ers, the philosophy is not in question: They run a power offense and then attack with the pass when the defense loads up on the line of scrimmage.

    Or attack with the run when the defense is worried about Michael Crabtree, Anquan Boldin and Vernon Davis.

    In the first half of this season, Roman and Harbaugh essentially had to manage the offense through Crabtree’s absence, Kaepernick’s early wobbles and some other injuries.

    But things are clicking now, the 49ers are on a six-game winning streak, and Kaepernick looks fresh and fiery.

    “We haven’t done as well from time to time,” Roman said. “But we’ve had some injuries and whatnot and I think we’ve overcome a lot this year, really a lot …

    “So I’m really proud of stepping up and getting it done and getting us into the playoffs when everybody’s gunning for you, every week …

    “We’re the big boys in town now and we knew that going into the season, that we were going to get everybody’s best shot. And our guys did a great job.”

    Now they’re in the playoffs, when Roman will continue to be the 49ers’ key offensive constant and a lightning rod for good and bad, more now than ever.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Support, timing key to Rams plan

    By Jim Thomas

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/support-timing-key-to-rams-plan/article_7e2fb1d3-e88c-5e7d-8317-60fc286b74dc.html

    The St. Louis stadium/Rams relocation saga reached another milepost Friday with the unveiling of a stadium project on the north edge of downtown that would cost between $860 million and $985 million.

    For now, the proposal presented at Union Station by Dave Peacock and Bob Blitz is the life raft that’s keeping NFL football afloat in St. Louis.

    “I think to the degree that we progress on a plan and demonstrate the viability of it, we’re in good shape — the community — because the NFL bylaws have certain stipulations that relate to moving and relocation that we will have met in the local community,” said Peacock, who with Blitz was appointed by Gov. Jay Nixon to develop a plan to keep professional football in St. Louis.

    But if the situation reaches the level where the Rams are lobbying with the league to move to Los Angeles, two areas are almost certain to be discussed:

    • Is the St. Louis effort to address its stadium situation a case of too little, too late?

    • Is there sufficient support in the business community and corporate sector to keep the Rams profitable and viable in St. Louis?

    Peacock, a former Anheuser-Busch executive, seemed almost eager to address both topics during an hour-long presentation and news conference.

    “We have a sense of urgency,” Peacock said. “But I can tell you, San Diego’s been slogging away for years trying to get a stadium and has not been able to achieve it. The Minneapolis project took several years. Atlanta. San Francisco.

    “If we are actually able to raise the financing and start a project in 2016 based on where we started, this would be lightning speed in the stadium world relative to what’s been done at other places.

    “So I don’t necessarily buy the too little, too late. Because if you also read the NFL bylaws, they’re very clear that they don’t have a time parameter associated with them. They basically say that the team has to exhaust all of its opportunities in the local market before it can move, and that no team can move just for the opportunity to make more money. I believe in those NFL bylaws.”

    Although the Rams have said next to nothing during the entire stadium process, the team’s statement in response to Friday’s unveiling of the stadium plan spoke volumes. It read in part:

    “The St. Louis Rams have worked for many years, with several agencies and commissions, and their senior management, responsible for stadium facilities in St. Louis. This includes multiple discussions with the Governor (Jay Nixon)’s recently formed NFL Task Force (Peacock and Blitz) …”

    It may sound like bureaucratic jibberish at face value, but the underlying point is that the Rams want it known that they’ve been working hard at a stadium solution for “many years” with no success. While also pointing out that the task force is “recently formed.”

    It’s a message designed as much for the league office and the 31 other franchise owners as it is for St. Louis. And those franchise owners could be voting on relocation as early as spring 2016.

    Meanwhile, as of Monday, Rams owner Stan Kroenke has already reached an agreement to build a stadium in Inglewood, Calif., not far from the Los Angeles airport.

    As this scenario unfolds, the Rams’ argument at league meetings and behind the scenes is expected to include questions about the “sense of urgency” by St. Louis. One question that may have already been posed by the Rams in league circles: Why wasn’t this task force formed after the arbitration decision in January 2013?

    (That decision favored the Rams’ estimated $700 million proposal to upgrade the Edward Jones Dome.)

    Peacock said Friday he has been working on the stadium project “off and on” for more than a year, and has been doing intensive work over the past three months.

    Providing examples of the level of activity, Peacock said there was a meeting with league officials in November shortly after the formation of the task force. He said there have also been meetings that involved both Rams and NFL officials together, as well as what he called “constant contact” with both entities.

    Peacock also confirmed what previously had been reported through sources, namely, that Kroenke had yet to meet directly with the task force.

    “I have not met, nor has Bob met Stan,” Peacock said. “I’m sure he’s seen these (stadium plans) because they’ve been shared early on in the process. I don’t know the impact or his reaction, because we haven’t met with him.”

    It should be noted that Peacock said he has yet to meet formally with NFL commissioner Roger Goodell so far in this process.

    “I’m sure we’ll meet with Stan Kroenke when the time is right,” Peacock said. “His representatives have represented him well. At the same time we’re dealing with the right people at the league and we’ve been given, I’d say, the right level of support to continue on our path.”

    As for the question of business and corporate support, the NFL relocation guidelines specify that a team requesting to move must demonstrate it has exhausted all opportunities to be successful in its market. A perceived lack of corporate support is an area the Rams are expected to attack as battle lines are drawn in the team’s increasingly apparent attempts to relocate.

    “I like to deal in fact and data,” Peacock said. “The facts are half of the NFL teams play in cities with less Fortune 1000 companies than St. Louis has. We have seven of the top 200 private companies in the country.

    “From just an economic standpoint, about 13 teams play in cities with a smaller GDP, if you will, or economy, than St. Louis. So it’s hard for me to say we don’t have the business support or the capability of business support.”

    in reply to: Anyone giving Seattle a chance over Carolina? #16040
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Wilson v. Newton

    s

    s

    Why is Russell Wilson a better quarterback than Cam Newton?

    Russell Wilson and Cam Newton, who meet Saturday in the NFC Divisional playoffs, are easy to contrast. But some of the success Wilson has enjoyed comes from the playoff-ready Seahawks team he plays for.

    Jerry Brewer

    http://seattletimes.com/html/sports/2025418350_brewer09xml.html

    RENTON — Russell Wilson delivered the perfect joke for his audience. When reporters asked him Wednesday to compare himself to Carolina quarterback Cam Newton, Wilson went to the obvious, but effective, quip about their difference in size.

    “You know, he’s — I don’t know, what? — 7 inches taller than me,” Wilson said, laughing. “You know, he’s probably, I don’t know, 260 (pounds).”

    The giant vs. the pocket quarterback. It’s the easy button. Newton — listed at 6 feet 5, 245 pounds but probably closer to 6-6, 260 — looks like a power forward. Wilson, at 5-11 and 215 pounds, was once considered too small to get on the NFL quarterback ride at the amusement park. That’s one of two popular ways to contrast them.

    Here’s the other: Wilson is the mature, dependable and tireless worker who has had more success because he maximizes his talent. Newton is the crazy, erratic and spoiled one who will never live up to his potential.

    The overachiever vs. the loafer. It’s the easy button, too.

    Just as it’s unfair and now irrelevant to obsess over Wilson’s diminutive stature, you’re also being too rigid in evaluating quarterbacks and how they develop by concluding that Wilson is better than Newton merely because of their different attitudes.

    There’s no question Wilson has the more ideal approach. And there’s no question Newton, who is a fine quarterback except for his bouts of immaturity, could benefit from being more like Wilson. But there’s far more to contrasting them. And there’s really no need to use Wilson’s extraordinary traits as a weapon against Newton or Colin Kaepernick or any other gifted, young NFL quarterback.

    Wilson and Andrew Luck have distinguished themselves as the best of this crop of intriguing 27-and-under signal-callers. Luck has done it with his incredible production and ability to carry a team that’s still being built around him. Wilson has done it with off-the-charts efficiency, good production and the savvy to play within the system of a team that was ready-made and lacking only a quarterback when he arrived.

    He’s a different animal than Luck and Newton, who were both No. 1 overall choices charged with being franchise saviors. Wilson was a third-round choice, No. 75 overall, in the 2012 draft. The Seahawks were poised to be a winning team upon his arrival. As a result, they had a different approach to his development.

    It’s an approach that more teams should consider using. Seahawks coach Pete Carroll has stated his quarterback philosophy often: He understands that quarterback is the most important position on his team, but because it’s also the most difficult position to play in sports, his goal is to lighten the QB’s load. He wants to have a great defense and run game, which gives a quarterback incredible support. And while Carroll wants a high-performing quarterback, he doesn’t tolerate a lot of turnovers to get that kind of production.

    In short, he wants a star who’s willing to be a role player.

    Even before Wilson was drafted, Carroll spelled out his vision.

    “We’re always looking for a guy that can manage the offense, really,” Carroll said back then. “We’ve always said, even way back with Heisman Trophy winners (at USC), we were never structuring the offense to be carried by one guy. We always wanted to have a guy that would be very understanding of the system and of the people and the assets around him that could mix and move the football about.

    “With that, we’ve always liked a quarterback that could move. We’ve always liked the ability to move because it fits with our running game and the style of complementary throwing game that we like to match up with it. … We don’t need to have a guy that’s a pure runner. We’re not talking about that. But a guy that has the ability to move and get out of the pocket and give us the variety of sets where we want to get that quarterback to slow down the pass rush and stuff. That’s always been part of it. That hasn’t always been what we’ve had, but that’s always been something that we’ve looked for in the ideal.”

    Wilson is the ideal Carroll quarterback.

    He has become one of the NFL’s biggest stars mostly because he’s a fantastic talent. But he’s also had so much success early in his career because the Seahawks have streamlined his responsibilities. The franchise has never put all its fortunes on his right arm and swift legs.

    Newton is more of the classic young franchise quarterback. The Panthers have asked too much of him at times, which has exposed his flaws. When they have simplified their approach — like they did late this season and all of 2013, when the team went 12-4 — Newton has played better, and the team has thrived.

    In 2011, Newton began his NFL career with back-to-back 400-yard passing performances, and he became the first rookie to throw for more than 4,000 yards. His skills — the big arm and good touch on deep throws, the fast and powerful running style, the charisma, the confidence he inspires — are ridiculous.

    But just because you’re capable of throwing for 4,000 yards as a rookie doesn’t mean you should be asked to do so.

    For all his Superman gestures, Newton still is a 25-year-old with a lot to learn. He has had to do much of that learning under intense scrutiny and often without a balanced roster to mask his weaknesses.

    Because of his size, Wilson had a more difficult path to the NFL, but since he proved himself, he has had an easier time developing. Part of that is because of his extraordinary intelligence and mindset. Part of that is because the Seahawks have a system that enables the quarterback to have a softer landing.

    In the young quarterback derby, Wilson is ahead of Newton. But it’s not just because Wilson is a perfect study, and Newton is flawed and freewheeling.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator


    Stadium plans guarantee nothing in St. Louis or L.A.

    By Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/15357/stadium-plans-guarantee-nothing-in-st-louis-or-l-a

    ST. LOUIS — It’s been a week of pretty pictures revealing elaborate plans not only for new NFL-sized stadiums in Los Angeles and St. Louis but also for trendy developments in and around those new venues. Those pictures sitting on an easel, coming across a wide-screen television, or printed on heavy stock as a handout look great but they don’t mean much more than the paper they’re printed on.

    The intentions of St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke are clear. The intentions of Dave Peacock, Bob Blitz and the city of St. Louis are also clear. There will be plenty of negotiations and conversations had over the next, well, who knows how long it will all take? But there are still many difficult questions that need to be asked and answered.

    In the grand scheme of things, though, the future of the Rams in St. Louis could ultimately fall in the hands of the people who reside at 345 Park Avenue in New York City. That’s home of the NFL offices, and if we’ve learned anything about the league in the past few years, it’s that it will do what it believes is best for the league.

    Considering that, it’s no coincidence that as Peacock presented the St. Louis plan on Friday afternoon, he consistently referred to having an understanding of the bylaws and rules that dictate relocation in the NFL. He cited the league rules that say a team must exhaust all opportunities in its current city and referred to the rule that a team owner cannot move simply to enrich himself further.

    There are other important to note provisions that say things like a team must put forth a “good faith” effort to negotiate with its current city before it can leave. That falls in line with the “exhaust all opportunities” portion of the rulebook.

    To that end, Peacock, who has been working on the project for more than a year and putting in long hours for the past three months, emphasized the expedient efforts with which the St. Louis plan has come together.

    “If we were moving in ’16 or ’17 on a new stadium, based on when this process started, I think that would be half the time a lot of other teams did,” Peacock said. “I don’t necessarily buy the ‘too little, too late.’ … I believe those NFL bylaws have been governing actions of the league for a while now and I have faith.”

    Of course, Kroenke’s counter to that would point to the failed arbitration process to revamp the Edward Jones Dome as well as the time after that in which St. Louis made no real offers to keep the team. Even in the statement the Rams issued Friday afternoon, there were subtle hints of a team implying that it’s been “good faith negotiating” well before Friday’s reveal.

    “The St. Louis Rams have worked for many years, with several agencies and commissions, and their senior management, responsible for stadium facilities in St. Louis,” the statement read. “This includes multiple discussions with the Governor’s recently formed NFL Task Force. We received the Task Force materials shortly before the press conference. We will review them and speak with the Task Force representatives.”

    The argument that the city didn’t negotiate much during and after the arbitration process rings true but it also doesn’t mean that all options were exhausted. Pointing to the differences in required public money and the idea of retrofitting the Edward Jones Dome to guarantee 10 more years rather than a long-term solution, Peacock doesn’t see negotiations for a new stadium and arbitration for the old one as the same thing.

    “Trying to compare that to our proposal is a little bit of apples and oranges,” Peacock said.

    When all is said and done, through the many permutations of what could happen, the NFL and its owners will be the ones to decide on what it values most. Kroenke offers the most tangible Los Angeles plan in two decades, and the league has made no bones about its desire to return to that market.

    St. Louis offers a real, seemingly feasible plan to continue as an NFL city. And while the league has rules and bylaws, it’s also showed plenty of willingness to alter direction toward what most benefits the overall health of the league.

    For that reason, Peacock has been sure to keep the league in the loop every step of the way. He met with NFL executives in November and with the Rams and more league executives later on.

    “We’ve had great discussions with the league,” Peacock said. “The NFL is extremely engaged in this.”

    Meanwhile, some around the league were taken aback by the reveal of the Los Angeles plans on Monday but that doesn’t make Kroenke’s offer any less appealing.

    It’s highly unlikely that there will be a resolution to any of this anytime soon. In the meantime, at least now we know where Kroenke and St. Louis stand. Unless Kroenke and the Rams surprise by simply agreeing to St. Louis’ plan, it’s up to the NFL to determine what happens next.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Uh no. Rams fans didn’t like Schotty, this guy is worse imo. The niners offense bailed at the end of the season. He does fit fishers plodding offense though sigh.

    I like Roman. (I also liked Schott.) IMO Roman was held back by Kaepernick.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    St. Louis unveils plan for stadium

    By Nick Wagoner | ESPN.com

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/

    ST. LOUIS — Less than a week after news came that St. Louis Rams owner Stan Kroenke is part of a group developing a new NFL stadium in Los Angeles, St. Louis revealed a plan for a new stadium of its own Friday afternoon.

    The plan calls for the construction of a 64,000-seat open-air NFL stadium on about 90 acres on the north St. Louis riverfront, about a half-mile from the Gateway Arch.

    According to former Anheuser-Busch president Dave Peacock and local attorney Bob Blitz, the two-man task force appointed by Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon to come up with the plan, the new stadium would cost between $860 million and $985 million, with construction to begin in 2016 and be completed in 2020.

    In addition to housing a football team, the plan also accounts for the potential addition of a Major League Soccer team, some renovations of the Edward Jones Dome to attract major sporting events like the Final Four, and additional development in the currently blighted north St. Louis area. Peacock has been in contact with MLS commissioner Don Garber.

    According to Peacock, the proposal isn’t just about keeping football in St. Louis but altering the way the city is viewed.

    “It’s about the future of our region,” Peacock said. “It’s about how we are perceived, it’s about no longer accepting the notion that our assets can just dissolve in front of us or leave.”

    ===


    Key bullet points from St. Louis stadium plan

    By Nick Wagoner | ESPN.com

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/

    ST. LOUIS — As with any stadium proposal anywhere, there are plenty of moving parts when it comes to the new deal being put on the table in St. Louis’ attempt to keep the Rams in the city.

    With that in mind, this is an effort to lay out some of the key points of the proposal. By no means is this comprehensive, and Friday’s news conference didn’t answer anything close to all of the tough questions and hurdles that remain, but here’s what the task force of Dave Peacock and Bob Blitz wanted to convey on Friday in bullet-point form:

    The plan features an open-air, 64,000-seat stadium on the north riverfront with views to the south of the Gateway Arch and downtown St. Louis. There are an estimated 10,439 parking spaces provided in the plan, and the stadium will have access to multiple forms of public transportation.
    The expected cost is between $860 million and $985 million.
    The goal of the plan isn’t just to house an NFL team but also lure a Major League Soccer team. Peacock and Blitz have already discussed that possibility with MLS Commissioner Don Garber, and the plans have built in 30,000 lower-bowl seats for MLS and international soccer events.
    The stadium will be a public asset owned by a public entity such as the St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority and would be leased to the Rams (or the NFL team it houses) with the ability to sublet to a possible MLS franchise. Any revenue splits, operating rights, management agreements, parking terms, signage, naming rights and other revenue generating initiatives would be negotiated with the NFL team.

    Here’s the breakdown of the 64,000 seats for NFL games:

    54,020 general seats
    2,000 suite seats (includes private suites and on-field seating)
    480 loge box seats (eight seats in each of 60 boxes)
    7,500 club seats

    The 90-plus acre site is a mix of publicly and privately owned property. The aforementioned cost includes the expected purchase and acquisition of the properties.
    The plan also includes the financing of improvements to the Edward Jones Dome so it can be repositioned as a permanent convention center that can also be used to attract major sporting events such as college basketball’s Final Four.
    From a financing perspective, the new stadium is not expected to add any new tax burden on taxpayers locally or in the state.

    Here are the estimated costs:

    Land/Demolition – $90-110 million
    Stadium construction – $600-650 million
    Parking/infrastructure needs – $170-225 million
    Total – $860-985 million

    Here’s how the financing is expected to work according to Peacock and Blitz:

    Private financing

    NFL team ownership – $200-250 million
    NFL (committed to match up to $200 million through G4 loan program) – $200 million
    Total – $400-450 million

    Potential public sources (all contingent on commitment of private financing)

    Extension of bonds on Edward Jones Dome – $300-350 million
    Missouri Development Finance Board support – $15-25 million
    Brownfield tax credits (for improving blighted areas) – $25-30 million
    Personal seat license proceeds – $120-120 million
    Total – $460-535 million

    According to the plan, the land would be acquired, bids for contractors and site preparation would begin between June of this year and December 2016. The financing documents and lease documents would be negotiated and signed in 2017, with site preparation completed and permits obtained the same year. Actual construction and marketing of the seat licenses would begin in early 2018, with construction completed in time for the start of the 2020 NFL season.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    zn wrote:
    Jim Thomas @jthom1
    Not many details on public financing, but Peacock says he’s been given confidence that there’s a way make it work w/out new taxes.

    WTF?

    This is an important detail.

    And public money is public money. Unless I’m missing something, that’s either taxes or bonds. Which are still paid off by taxes in the long run.

    One rumor is tourist taxes.

Viewing 30 posts - 45,511 through 45,540 (of 47,899 total)