Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
znModeratorTalib is a good player, but Eagles went right at him last year and put up 51 points in that game. Not the shutdown CB he once was.
— Tommy Lawlor (@lawlornfl) March 9, 2018
znModeratorSo Aqib Talib will rip off someone's chain, and then Marcus Peters will throw it in the stands?
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) March 9, 2018
March 8, 2018 at 4:14 pm in reply to: Here are the Rams' 2018 draft picks after trading Robert Quinn #83661
znModeratorIt’s 2 4ths. 1 is 111 or 130, we don’t know yet…
=============
Ok, I’m confused. How do you draft two forths of a player.
I can see drafting 70 percent of a 110 percent of a player.
But no way I see them drafting two forths of a player.w
vHow about this though.
5 6ths is just one 6th short of being 6 6ths, which equals one. 6 6ths = 1.
So if they pick up another 6th, they will have 6 6ths, and that means they can combine them and convert them together into 1 1st rounder.
…
znModeratorWho says they will be going after players from Denver? What about other teams? I heard the Rams and CB Sam Shields are supposed to meet. He played in Green Bay.
No one says it. I was just looking at their UFAs and speculating.
I just think they could use one or 2 of those Denver guys, if they’re all healthy now.
znModeratorYes, someone like Wade Phillips can attract former players to the Rams and be a better fit for his defense.
It’s clear they will address it through a combination of in-house players and draft picks, but personally I don’t expect a big free agent signing. Having said that, 2-3 Denver defenders who played for Wade are UFAs this year, though, only 1 is a backer and 2 of them were on IR in 2017. Still if they have recovered and can play having been on IR could just make them cheap. It’s not just LB they have to address, it’s CB and NT too, so signing a Denver player or 2 on the cheap would help.
I think them trying to sign Tru is a giveaway that they would use the 1st rounder on an edge rusher. I’ve heard it said many times that Wade can come up with ILBs out of lower picks, and that he wants the money/higher picks on the outside. Though Tru wasn’t signed before because he was asking too much, so who knows.
This reminds me of the defensive rebuild in 2000. They promoted some guys (like Little), made a trade, signed a couple of guys, and drafted some guys (though not all that effectively I thought), and the result was good. They have a good core to build around in Peters, Joyner, J.Johnson, Donald, and Brockers, plus some depth that may or may not include a potential starter (like Littleton obviously).
znModeratorWorth noting:
Trade: Rams deal LB Alec Ogletree to Giants
By Bill Barnwell
Defensive coordinator Wade Phillips has helped develop unheralded inside linebackers such as Todd Davis and Brandon Marshall in years past, so the Rams might be able to get by without big-money players on the interior.
znModeratorJust something on how it’s harder to draft linemen nowadays
***
from: https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/03/08/free-agency-players-teams-league-trend-mmqb-notebook
ALBERT BREER
I think the Rams’ success in signing Andrew Whitworth to a three-year, $36 million deal last year, at 35 years old, is helping Patriots free-agent LT Nate Solder build a market. Solder is easily the top left tackle on the market, and could provide a quick-fix answer for the Broncos or Texans in an era when there are few sure-thing offensive linemen coming out of college.
znModeratorfrom: https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/03/08/free-agency-players-teams-league-trend-mmqb-notebook
ALBERT BREER
The Rams trading Alec Ogletree just five months after giving him a four-year, $42.75 million deal isn’t Los Angeles saying he can’t play. He wasn’t always the most consistent player, but this is more about the value that Wade Phillips puts in inside linebackers in his defense. As it’s set up, resources are better allocated in perimeter players—edge-rushing outside linebackers and corners. So maybe a change of scenery, and back to a 4-3, will help Ogletree.
And if it does, the Giants just fixed a hole that’s been there on their roster forever. Some teams don’t value off-ball linebackers at the level that Ogeltree is being compensated. But new Giants GM Dave Gettleman does, and his willingness to pay both Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis in Carolina is proof positive of that.
…
March 8, 2018 at 12:39 am in reply to: Here are the Rams' 2018 draft picks after trading Robert Quinn #83631
znModeratorBut you didn’t list two 4ths. You said 111 or 130.
It’s 2 4ths. 1 is 111 or 130, we don’t know yet. The other is tba, from the Giants. Hence:
1. Round 4 (111 or 130)
2. …tba, Giants
znModeratorSo can they sign Donald, Joyner AND Tru?
I’d be a lot less nervous about this if they kept Tru.
w
vWith the new cap space from Quinn and Tree and presumably also Tavon…yes IMO they can sign those 3 AND Watkins if they can reach a reasonable deal with him.
But I don’t see this as an issue of being less nervous.
With Peters, Joyner, J.Johnson, and signing Robey-Coleman as the nickel, plus either keeping Tru or drafting someone good…it’s not a matter of not being nervous…it’s beyond that, since with those guys they would instead have one of the best secondaries in the league.
…
…
March 8, 2018 at 12:10 am in reply to: Here are the Rams' 2018 draft picks after trading Robert Quinn #83628
znModeratorRamBill wrote:
Hit Rate on 6th Rounders is in the 10-15% range…..so if they actually keep them all (which i think there’s zero chance of that) ….you would think they’d be lucky to have 2 of them to stick.
BUT Snead has done better than average in the 6th
Here’s his 6th round picks–
Greg Zuerlein
E.J. Gaines
Garrett Gilbert
Bud Sasser –Medical
Cody Wichmann
Temarrick Hemingway
Josh Forrest
Mike Thomas
Tanzel SmartNot a bad list….2 major hits with Greg Z and Gaines….Still too early to on Thomas/Smart. Forrest was doing well until his knee injury.
March 7, 2018 at 11:47 pm in reply to: Here are the Rams' 2018 draft picks after trading Robert Quinn #83625
znModeratorWait…didn’t we get Miami’s 4th?
And where is the Rams’ 4th?
Rams 4th was traded for Peters.
It is the year of 4ths and 6ths.
First of all…that equals 9, so I make a motion that zn is removed as Treasurer of the Board.
No it’s 10. 1 1st, 1 3rd, 2 4ths, 1 5th, and 5 6ths.
znModeratorVincent Bonsignore@DailyNewsVinny
I think the bigger surprise would have been standing pat. The defense was good but not great.FYI on #Rams. Not a given Trumaine Johnson leaves. Just sayin’
znModeratorI am stunned. I saw this on my phone earlier, and couldn’t get here until now. You guys aren’t helping me. I need some explanation.
Tree isn’t my favorite player. He wasn’t going into my Ring of Fame. But he seemed decent. And I saw some upside still, since he was just moved to MLB.
So…I have faith in Wade. I think he knows what he is doing. Tree doesn’t fit his scheme. Okay. But…
The Rams run a 3-4.
And right now, I’m not sure they even have 4 LBs on the roster. WTF? Quinn’s gone, and AO is gone now. And Barwin is a FA, and there is talk of not keeping Barron.
Where are we now?
I mean…we have about a dozen picks in the 4th round now. Is the LB draft pool especially deep so that there will be 6 or 8 starters available in the 4th?
This move surprised me. But…uh…these guys have a track record of knowing what they are doing, so I will just sit here and wait for the next spectacle. I guess.
They do have some LBs though I don’t know how many of them are viable starters. The first that jump to mind are Longeacre (who needs to be signed), Littleton and Ebukam. Carlos Thompson gets some buzz. Their roster actually lists–without Quinn or Tree or Barwin–7 LBs. If they remake the entire starting LB corps, as apparently they are, that means they have to add guys of course but there’s some talent on hand, too.
znModeratorVincent Bonsignore@DailyNewsVinny
I’m not so sure Barron is back next season. Good chance he gets released. Phillips needs players up front that better fit his 3/4Rodger Saffold@Rodger_Saffold
Bruh this business is nuts!Alec ogletree@MROGLETREE52
Everything happens for a reason and GOD makes no mistake!! Can’t wait to get to the Big 🍎 and continue my career as NEW YORK FOOTBALL GIANT!! #Blessed #GOGIANTSAlden Gonzalez@Alden_Gonzalez
Big picture, this move — all these moves — are largely about the Rams’ desire to have the defense be on par with the offense. Now take a minute to think about how crazy that sounds.Rich Hammond@Rich_Hammond
Classy guy. He and his wife navigated a pregnancy during the 2016 relocation and he took it all in stride and was a team leader.
znModeratorScheme fits, cap space and the Rams’ departure from Alec Ogletree
Alden Gonzalez
LOS ANGELES — The Los Angeles Rams had already made enough trades that the general public had basically become desensitized to their offseason movement. But this latest one sent shock waves through the industry.
Alec Ogletree, a lynchpin in the Rams’ locker room, was dealt to the New York Giants on Wednesday, less than five months after signing a four-year, $42 million extension. The return was draft picks — a fourth- and a sixth-round pick in 2018, with next year’s seventh-rounder going to the Giants — and more salary cap space, which harkens back to the trade that sent outside linebacker Robert Quinn to the Miami Dolphins only five days earlier.
Ogletree, like Quinn, wasn’t an ideal fit in Wade Phillips’ 3-4 scheme, which is why Ogletree, like Quinn, was deemed better off somewhere else, giving the Rams additional salary-cap flexibility and draft capital they can use elsewhere. The Rams are now approaching $50 million in salary cap space — $3 million more will come off the books when they inevitably part ways with Tavon Austin — and have accumulated 10 picks for the upcoming draft.
The extra money can go toward retaining their own free agents — namely, wide receiver Sammy Watkins and cornerback Trumaine Johnson, whom they have expressed interest in retaining — and aligning the defense to Phillips’ vision. But the Ogletree trade can be boiled down to two essential, albeit vastly different, factors.
The Rams need to limit the amount of players who make significant money because of what is coming. Aaron Donald is awaiting an extension that would make him the game’s highest-paid defensive player, preferably by a wide margin. But Todd Gurley is only one year behind him, and Jared Goff is only one year behind him. Soon, those three could absorb up to a third of their salary cap space. The Rams must plan accordingly.
They’re not satisfied with their defense, particularly their run defense. The Rams gave up the 12th-fewest points and generated the fifth-most turnovers, but they gave up the fifth-most rushing yards. And a lot of their struggles could be traced to players who weren’t scheme fits, Quinn and Ogletree among them. They’re trying to get the defense on par with the offense. It sounds crazy given the recent history of this franchise, but it’s the new reality.
The Ogletree trade means it’s a good chance that inside linebacker Mark Barron, a potential cap casualty, will stay. The Rams have promising young players who are next in line. Cory Littleton can replace Ogletree, Matt Longacre can replace Quinn and Samson Ebukam, last year’s fourth-round pick, can replace Connor Barwin, who is slated to become an unrestricted free agent. Phillips has a history of making unheralded linebackers rich, including former sixth-round pick Danny Trevathan.
But the Rams still need serious linebacker help from the outside, not to mention potential replacements at nose tackle, center and slot corner.
Ogletree, the 30th overall pick out of Georgia in 2013, was a converted safety who eventually transitioned to middle linebacker and blossomed into a leader. In 67 career starts, he racked up 501 tackles, 5.5 sacks, 6 interceptions, 43 passes defended, 12 forced fumbles and 2 touchdowns. But Pro Football Focus graded him 76th among 86 qualified linebackers last season, making his upcoming price tag unsuitable.
Ogletree would’ve been a week away from unrestricted free agency had the Rams not locked him up in October. His departure would’ve probably netted a fourth-round compensatory pick in 2019, which means the Ogletree extension — like the Austin extension — didn’t provide any real benefit.
Now it’s all about what the Rams do with the empty space
znModeratorAlden Gonzalez@Alden_Gonzalez
Rams are confident in their next wave of linebackers, specifically ILB Cory Littleton and OLBs Samson Ebukam and Matt Longacre, who in some ways outperformed the starters at those positions. But they no doubt need to add. Part of them is hopeful of getting a good one at No. 23.
znModeratorTrade: Rams deal LB Alec Ogletree to Giants
By Bill Barnwell
Grade for Rams: C+
Grade for Giants: CThe Giants were loathe to spend money on coverage linebackers under the reign of general manager Jerry Reese, who never adequately replaced Antonio Pierce in the middle of the field after the playoff hero finished his career in 2009. Draft picks like Jonathan Goff and a bevy of free agents — everyone from Jon Beason to J.T. Thomas — couldn’t stay healthy or play effective football. With Dave Gettleman coming over from a Panthers organization that built its defense around Thomas Davis and Luke Kuechly, it’s no surprise that he might want to address inside linebacker this offseason.
Ogletree is certainly the most likely candidate to succeed the Giants have brought in since Pierce, but it’s hard to argue that the former Georgia star is likely to return value. The 26-year-old is a stud athlete, but he hasn’t been able to turn those measurables into significant production since 2014. Ogletree forced 10 fumbles over his first two seasons, but he has only been responsible for two strips over the three ensuing years. He made tackles on 16.1 percent of Los Angeles’ run plays last season, a rate which was 60th in the league among players with 200 run snaps or more.
The problem is that Ogletree plays a position the league really doesn’t seem to value with significant contracts. The Rams signed Ogletree to a four-year, $42.8 million extension last October, and the Giants will essentially have Ogletree on a four-year, $38-million deal with $10 million guaranteed, all coming this season. That’s not in line with what better players have gotten in free agency; Dont’a Hightower, for one, got four years and $35.5 million to stay with the Patriots last offseason. Useful players like Zach Brown, who is back in the market this year, had to settle for a one-year pact. It’s difficult to believe Ogletree would have got this much if he were a free agent.
The Rams free up cap space as part of this deal, which marks the second expensive defender they’ve dealt away in a week after trading Robert Quinn to the Dolphins. It now seems more likely that they’ll hang on to fellow linebacker Mark Barron, who seemed like a plausible cap casualty. L.A. will have $6.5 million in dead money on their cap for Ogletree this year, but with $47.3 million in space, they can use the savings to bring back Sammy Watkins, who would otherwise be an unrestricted free agent. Defensive coordinator Wade Phillips has helped develop unheralded inside linebackers like Todd Davis and Brandon Marshall in years past, so the Rams might be able to get by without big money players on the interior.
Gettleman gives up fourth- and sixth-round picks to the Rams, who send a 2019 seventh-rounder back as part of the deal. The Giants have the second pick in the fourth round (No. 102) and the third-to-last selection in that round (pick 135) as a compensatory chit. There’s a big difference between the two selections, obviously, but either pick would represent a victory for the Rams.
znModeratorRich Hammond@Rich_Hammond
This also seems to be a huge “In Wade We Trust” move by the Rams. He turns 71 in June but it sure doesn’t seem like he’s heading into the sunset. They’re blowing up half their defense to rebuild it in his image.Reaction from Rams players already has started, re: Ogletree. He was a captain and an emotional leader.
znModeratorAlden Gonzalez@Alden_Gonzalez
Some insight into the Rams’ thinking on trading Alec Ogletree: They believe last year’s defense had a lot of 4-3 players who didn’t necessarily fit into Wade Phillips’ 3-4 scheme, Ogletree (and Robert Quinn, dealt to the Dolphins) among them. Signing Ogletree to an extension gave them down-the-road flexibility at that time, which they have now used to recoup draft picks.The Alec Ogletree void for the Rams will come mostly in their locker room, which is why some players have expressed shock, even anger, through social media. Ogletree, a captain the last two years, had blossomed into a key emotional leader for them.
The Alec Ogletree trade to the Giants means there’s a pretty solid chance that ILB Mark Barron, a potential cap casualty, stays. The savings on Ogletree can be used on the Rams’ own free agents — namely, WR Sammy Watkins and CB Trumaine Johnson — and on remaking their defense to fit Wade Phillips’ scheme. In a larger sense, it’s about creating room for potential extensions with Aaron Donald, Todd Gurley and Jared Goff, who are each a year apart.
—
Rams' offseason needs/desires, in no particular order …
* Watkins
* Johnson
* C
* NT/DE
* ILB
* Slot CB
* OLB
* OLBThat, in addition to figuring out a long-term deal with Aaron Donald and, potentially, Lamarcus Joyner. Spotrac has them at $47 in cap space, plus 10 picks.
— Alden Gonzalez (@Alden_Gonzalez) March 7, 2018
March 7, 2018 at 4:45 pm in reply to: Here are the Rams' 2018 draft picks after trading Robert Quinn #83576
znModeratorNow its:
Round 1 (23)
no round 2
Round 3 (87)
Round 4 (111 or 130)
…tba, Giants
Round 5 (160)
Round 6 (5 picks, including one going to Miami and one coming from NYG)
no round 710 picks total.
…
znModeratorRamUK wrote:
Rams ‘frustrated’ with Ogletree’s run support
Per Rappaport==
Ian Rapoport@RapSheet
The #Rams are trading LB Alec Ogletree to the #Giants for 2 draft picks, source said. He was offered to the #Chiefs, too, but they declined. @AdamSchefter on it first.
znModeratorWe trade a starting LB who recently signed a 5-year contract for a couple of picks?
Kind of strange, yeah.
Anyway in 2018 clearing out AO means they have dead money on him for 6.4 M and save 5.2 M.
I would say rignt now that that’s not enough savings to make this look like a slamdunk move.
/…
Actually those numbers might not be right, stay tuned.
.
znModeratorWe trade a starting LB who recently signed a 5-year contract for a couple of picks?
Kind of strange, yeah.
Anyway in 2018 clearing out AO means they have dead money on him for 6.4 M and save 5.2 M.
I would say rignt now that that’s not enough savings to make this look like a slamdunk move.
/…
znModeratorCompensation update: Giants are trading their fourth-round pick and their sixth-round pick in return for LB Alec Ogletree and the Rams' 2019 seventh-round pick, per source.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) March 7, 2018
znModeratorThere’s a very good chance they can’t keep both. It’s also fairly evident they are devoting this year to getting the defense into shape. The way I see it, McVay isn’t having this foisted on him, he’s obviously part of the decision, so if he is in on risking Watkins to keep Joyner, that must be to him the lesser of 2 evils or the better choice in a tough decision … something like that.
znModeratorWest Virginia Teachers Strike Ends With 5% Pay Raise
All state workers will get increase after deal reached with Republican-lead legislaturehttps://www.wsj.com/articles/west-virginia-teachers-strike-ends-with-5-pay-raise-1520358753
znModeratorMarch 6, 2018 at 1:27 am in reply to: rare signal from the early universe sends scientists clues about dark matter #83513
znModeratorA stunning discovery about the start of the universe
link: https://gantdaily.com/2018/03/05/a-stunning-discovery-about-the-start-of-the-universe/
For millennia, humans have sat under a clear midnight sky and marveled at the spectacle emblazoned across the heavens. The stars seem eternal, as if they have always been there. But there’s just one problem.
It isn’t so.
The universe was once entirely dark, with nary a light anywhere throughout the entire cosmos. And then a single star burst into nuclear flame, sundering the void. Then another and another, leading to the stars and galaxies of the familiar universe. In what could well be a stunning breakthrough, a group of astronomers have announced that they have found radio signals that appear to provide evidence of the first stars to come into existence. And, just to add a bit of spice to the announcement, it’s possible that they might have discovered dark matter, a hypothesized substance that has eluded discovery for decades.
Astronomer Avi Loeb, a professor at Harvard University, is quoted by the Associated Press as saying that “if confirmed, this discovery deserves two Nobel Prizes,” one for observing the signal of the first stars and the other for detecting dark matter. He went on to conservatively point out that both claims are extraordinary and require extraordinary evidence. He urged caution.
And this caution is warranted. The observed signal is very small. Radio sources in our own Milky Way galaxy can be 10,000 times stronger than the observed signal. The researchers needed to work very hard to remove this dominant signal. It’s like trying to hear someone whispering to you while at a rock concert. If you know the song and vocalist very well, you could — at least in principle — mask out the band and recover the whisper. But if the amplifiers had a crackle or the lead singer had a cold, you might get it wrong.
New data could support or falsify this measurement. Observation of the first stars is more likely to be confirmed, with observation of dark matter being less certain. However, if confirmed, it is certainly true that this faint radio signal could be an enormous step forward in our understanding of the birth of the universe.
It’s perhaps important to remember that this work is only possible because of publicly funded science. While most people acknowledge the role of science in generating new technologies that improve our lives, publicly funded science has been responsible for discovery after discovery, leading us to an understanding of the world around us that scientists a mere hundred years ago could only dream of.
The birth of the universe
While most people know something of the scientific explanation for how the universe came into existence, not everyone knows the full story of what physics has discovered. Just shy of 14 billion years ago, the universe was created in an event called the Big Bang.
All of the matter and energy of the visible universe was concentrated into a tiny volume that “exploded,” for the lack of a better word, and began expanding. The universe was unimaginably hot, glowing brighter than a steel furnace, with energy converting into matter and back again. Within three minutes, the nuclei of hydrogen and helium had formed, buffeted by an energetic bath of electrons. This swarm of charged particles glowed brightly and yet did not let light pass through it. From the point of view of light, the entire universe was a glowing, yet opaque, wall.
For 380,000 years, the universe expanded and cooled until it reached the temperature of 3,000 Kelvin (about 5,000 °F). At that temperature, hydrogen and helium nuclei could capture electrons, making atoms of hydrogen and helium. And, with that singular event, the universe went dark.
This was the beginning of what are called the Dark Ages. The universe continued to expand and cool, filled with clouds of hydrogen and helium. Gravity took over, with slightly denser areas of the universe pulling the gas into denser and denser clumps. While the universe on the whole was cooling, the temperature at the center of these clumps was rising; after about 180 million years eventually becoming so high that the gas started to experience nuclear fusion.
And the first stars were born.
Now it turns out that it is not so easy to directly see the light of those distant stars. After all, they were embedded in clouds of cool hydrogen gas that absorbed the light. And it was with that absorption that they revealed themselves. While hydrogen absorbed the light of the stars, it re-emitted that energy in an easily identifiable way.
Young stars burn hot and emit lots of ultraviolet light — the same kind that gives you a sunburn. Hydrogen gas absorbs the light and knocks the electrons into higher energy orbits. Eventually the electrons lose energy and they settle back into the lowest orbit in one of two configurations.
Hydrogen consists of one proton and one electron and both particles act like little magnets, with a north pole and a south pole. In an atom of hydrogen, the north poles of the proton and electron can point in the same or opposite direction. If they point in opposite directions, that’s the end of the line — they are in a stable configuration. But if the north poles point in the same direction, they’ll stay that way for a short time, and then the north pole of the electron will flip and point in the direction opposite to the proton. This is exactly what happens with ordinary magnets.
When the electron flips, it emits a characteristic wavelength (21 cm or 1420 MHz, approximately the same frequency as 4G cellular service). By detecting that radiation, scientists could indirectly detect the existence of the early stars.
The Big Bang caused the universe to expand, which has the consequence of stretching the wavelength of the radiation emitted by hydrogen and decreasing the frequency. Today, this radiation is only about 78 MHz, or just below the range of FM radio.
By studying the sky’s spectrum, astronomers determined that the period of time that the stars were heating the hydrogen gas clouds ranged from about 180 million to 260 million years after the Big Bang. After 260 million years, the gas had heated enough to be transparent to the light from stars. To give some perspective of the magnitude of the achievement, the Hubble Space Telescope has only been able to directly image galaxies that existed no earlier than 400 million years after the Big Bang. This discovery has cut in half the period of the universe for which we previously had no data.
The role of dark matter
While seeing evidence for the very first stars is exciting enough, there is another consequence of this research that might well be paradigm-changing. The size of the observed signal is twice as big as predictions. This means that either the gas of the early universe was much colder than expected, or the residual background radiation from the Big Bang was much hotter.
So, which was it? Truthfully, scientists don’t know. It appears to be that the hydrogen gas cooled much more effectively than can be explained by current theories. Several possible explanations were tested and the one that the authors claim to be most probable is that the early hydrogen gas interacted more strongly than expected with dark matter.
Dark matter is a proposed substance that explains many astronomical anomalies, like galaxies that rotate too quickly to be explained by the gravity of observed matter and even clusters of dozens or hundreds of galaxies that are moving so quickly that they shouldn’t be bound together. Dark matter doesn’t interact with light or any electromagnetic radiation and only makes its presence known through its gravitational interactions. If dark matter interacted with ordinary matter in the early universe, it could cool off the gas and this would explain the reported discrepancy.
As with all extraordinary claims, the key is verification by independent researchers. And, until confirmation is found, it is important to be skeptical. Other astronomers will attempt to replicate the measurement.
And new technology may come in handy. There is a telescope planned, called the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which was designed by a consortium of NASA and the Canadian and European space agencies. It is designed to directly measure light from very early stars, whose wavelength has been shifted to longer wavelengths by the expansion of the universe. JWST is the successor for the Hubble telescope and it is expected to revolutionize astronomy to the same degree that the Hubble telescope did. JWST is scheduled to launch in about 18 months.
March 5, 2018 at 7:10 pm in reply to: tweets, 3/5 (including best explanation of Joyner/Watkins situation) #83511
znModeratorAdam Schefter@AdamSchefter
The final four teams expected to be vying for free-agent quarterback Kirk Cousins are the Broncos, Cardinals, Jets and Vikings, per league sources.Robert Klemko@RobertKlemko
Writing a story on the ways teams gather info about prospects from other prospects. Rams GM Les Snead recalled multiple OL prospects in 2014 saying of Aaron Donald, “I wish he hadn’t been at the Senior Bowl too, because now I’m not gonna get drafted.”Alden Gonzalez@Alden_Gonzalez
McVay said “it’ll be fun” competing against the 49ers under Jimmy Garoppolo, but he’s still mindful about the Seahawks. “A lot of people forget that with two games left, we’re really playing them almost for the division. Seattle is still a force to be reckoned with.”Matt Barrows@mattbarrows
In 2011, the #49ers’ 10-man draft that began with Aldon Smith and Colin Kaepernick, in part, earned Trent Baalke exec. of the year. Last season, only Daniel Kilgore (fifth), Colin Jones (6th) and Mike Person (7th) played a snap.Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
It’ll be hard for the Steelers and Le’Veon Bell to do a deal. Why? B/c Bell playing out tag will lead to either …1) Getting $14.54M this year AND free agency next year.
2) Getting $35.48M over the next 2 years (2 tags).Steelers basically have to beat those outcomes.
-
AuthorPosts

