Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 11,196 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: setting up the Iggles game (Sunday 1/19, 3 et 12 noon pt) #154730
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Ive seen some crazy pundits falling into the overvaluing-a-wildcard-win syndrome.

    It was a great win over the vikes. Wonderful win.

    Eagles are a different animal. It will get ugly.

    There’s no scheming their way out of being bludgeoned by a superior OLine. By the start of the fourth quarter Saquon will be over 100 yards.

    Rams get a TD in garbage time to make it look close:
    Eagles 28
    Rams 20.

    w
    v

    in reply to: wildcard game–the big articles/commentaries #154718
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Nick Wright picks the rams to win the NFC, near the end of vid.

    in reply to: our reactions to the wildcard game #154704
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It feels like the Rams are on House money right now..

    I think thats true. Its been a weird year, but by the time we got to this point, the Rams had gotten to about where we thought they might get. Final four in the NFC.

    They are up against-it now, though. I wonder what Bill Belichex would do? Maybe put all their effort into stopping the eagles in the red zone. Seems like that what Belichex always preached when the other team had a talent advantage. Somehow gotta keep the eagles kicking field goals.

    This is why i am always the smartest guy in the room. I come up with the big ideas. “Just dont let the Eagles score touchdowns”.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the wildcard game #154703
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    …so, is the front four now the ‘strength of the team’? Is it becoming the identity of the Rams?

    Maybe it depends on how the front four does against the best OLines. Like Philadelphia. And Detroit.

    If they get bludgeoned again, then what do we say about them?

    Eagles are SIX point favorites.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the wildcard game #154677
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    OMG. Playoff stomping of the Vikings.

    I shall savor it.

    Doesnt change the fact that Tom Mack never moved, though.

    w
    v

    in reply to: setting up the Wild Card Game #154634
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Vikings now, 2.5 point favorites.

    I think the Vikes just have an all-round better team. And Justin Jefferson is just frightening.

    I’d feel better if Cooper Kupp was healthy, but i dunno what the deal is with Kupp.

    Vikings 23
    Rams 20

    w
    v

    Stafford is better than Darnold. Jefferson is scary. So is Puka. Van Ginkel is scary. And they have Hockenson back.

    But I am a believer in Sean Aristotle McVay.

    Rams 27
    Vikings 16

    Final Answer.

    i wonder if viking fans are still the second most obnoxious flamers in the league.
    49er fans, being first, of course.

    there was a time, back in the olden days, when flamers ran amok amonxt us, you know.

    w
    v

    in reply to: setting up the Wild Card Game #154632
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Vikings now, 2.5 point favorites.

    I think the Vikes just have an all-round better team. And Justin Jefferson is just frightening.

    I’d feel better if Cooper Kupp was healthy, but i dunno what the deal is with Kupp.

    Vikings 23
    Rams 20

    w
    v

    in reply to: remembering Aaron Donald (must read) #154493
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I’m a little surprised they didnt add Warren Sapp to that list. I think Sapp is in the conversation.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Seattle game #154492
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Enh. The team i wanted least in the playoffs — Vikings. Ah well.

    w
    v

    Where is your thirst for revenge?

    I’ll take the Vikings. Darnold looked erratic under pressure last night. Philly is the one team I think the Rams have no shot of beating, and Washington is the one team I think the Rams would almost certainly beat. The other teams are a coin flip, I think, including MN.

    I had a thirst for revenge once. Long ago.

    Joe Kapp hurtled over it.

    w
    v

    in reply to: setting up the Wild Card Game #154481
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Vikings favored on the road. Rams 1.5 point underdogs.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the Seattle game #154480
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Enh. The team i wanted least in the playoffs — Vikings. Ah well.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 12/30 – 1/2 #154408
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    PFF LA Rams@PFF_Rams
    13. Los Angeles Rams 📈📈

    Ranking all 32 offensive lines ahead of Week 18:

    Tough to rank this OLine given the small number of games they’ve been healthy. In general though, I’d put em in the 10th to 15th tier.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 1/3 #154423
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah, i dont understand why there is ZERO information about what is going on with Kupp.

    w
    v

    in reply to: setting up the Seattle game #154409
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams are 2.5 point underdogs against Seattle.

    w
    v

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154400
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    OK, so the rams are either gonna play the
    Packers or Commanders, OR,
    Lions or Vikings (whichever loses).

    Do we have any preferences?

    I dunno. All four seem like tough match-ups to me. I guess, i would rank them this way, maybe.

    Lions
    Packers
    Vikings
    Commanders.

    I guess, the rams would have the best chance against a rookie QB.

    The Rams just always seem to play like shit against the Packers. Its annoying.

    They lose to the Lion, but at least they play well against the Lions.

    Hard for me to see the Rams beating the vikings twice. I dunno.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams tweets etc. … 12/30 – 1/2 #154399
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    OJ Simpson rushed over 2000 yards in a 14 game season.

    I just wanted to point that out.

    These ‘records’ i hear about make me roll my eyes, sometimes.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Washington wins, Rams clinch #154338
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    If you watch this vid, you will see how the Seahawks never had a chance. Even if they had beaten the Rams. They would have needed, like, ten teams to win along WITH their win.

    in reply to: the big articles on the ARZ game #154337
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “rams look awful”

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154335
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Stu Jackson@StuJRams
    The Rams will be the NFC No. 3 seed and host the No. 6 seed Wild Card weekend (Commanders or Packers) with:

    1) A win/tie vs Seahawks

    OR

    2) Buccaneers loss/tie vs Saints

    Otherwise, Rams will be the No. 4 seed and host Lions/Vikings loser on Wild Card weekend

    Hosting the Lions would be interesting. But i cant see the Rams beating ‘any’ of those teams right now. Maybe the Commanders.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Washington wins, Rams clinch #154333
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I don’t really look forward to this that much. I don’t like watching the 2s in a meaningless game, and then that could be quickly followed by a Rams playoff defeat, depending on who they get in the first round (not their year). So if it goes that way–a 2s game followed by a playoff loss–the next good Rams game we get to see will be next September. Unless they win their 1st playoff game, which depends on who they play. That could be a win and a good watch, depending.

    I just want one good game before the season ends.

    They could do a lot between now and September and field a real contender in 2025. Need to draft and/or sign an OT, a CB or 2, an ILB, and probably a fast receiver. Which is all do-able.

    Yeah, i agree with all that.

    I dont like this way of clinching a division. Should have come down to actually beating Seattle.

    Such a weird season. The narrative is that the Rams won X number of games after the bye, etc, etc, but are they really playing good football now? The next two games could be ugly. Which would mean they have been playing ugly football since the Saints game, other than the crazy game against the Bills.

    w
    v

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154315
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Wash wins in OT

    w
    v

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154310
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i personally guarantee a win by the Commies.

    I have watched the Falcons and they are awful. So are the Houston Texans. Neither should be allowed in the playoffs.

    w
    v

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154302
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It would be funny if the Rams end up rooting for the 49ers to win Monday night.

    w
    v

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154298
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So the Bills are crushing the Jets, i see.

    …i still dont get how this works. Because there are still games next week. I would have thought the algrebra could all change again with next weeks games. ( assuming the Rams lose to the Seahawks and end up tied)

    w
    v

    If the “3 teams win” scenario works, then the Rams clinch now. This weekend.

    Otherwise, they have to beat Seattle next week.

    Today:

    Bengals won.
    Bills winning, by a huge margin.

    No, i get the ‘what’ of it. I dont get the ‘how’ of it. How can they determine the ‘strength of victory’ stuff when there is still a full slate of games NEXT week. Why wouldnt next weeks games change the final totals.

    w
    v

    in reply to: NFC playoff standings #154296
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So the Bills are crushing the Jets, i see.

    …i still dont get how this works. Because there are still games next week. I would have thought the algrebra could all change again with next weeks games. ( assuming the Rams lose to the Seahawks and end up tied)

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the ARZ game #154283
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Anyway. I didn’t think the defense was going to be the stronger unit on this team, especially now that the OL is back, and Higbee (where was he?) and just missing Hav does not account for this team’s lack of offensive juice.

    True, its not just on Hav, but I will say this – he has been very valuable this year. The difference when he’s not in there, is pretty stark.

    Draft a tackle with the first pick?

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the ARZ game #154280
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I am old school. To me, if a ball hits the ground, its not an interception.

    w
    v

    in reply to: our reactions to the ARZ game #154279
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Gutty, ugly, defensive win over a division opponent. Cool.

    40 plus points against the Bills. And now…this. Can McVay fix it? He hasnt in three games, now.

    I assume Kupp is playing injured, as per usual.

    The front four is just fun to watch, when they are not screwing up.

    The thing I am most impressed with is the front four are FAST. None of them are plodders. They fly around. I dunno if the Rams have ever had a faster DLine.

    10-6. After 1-4. Awesome. And yet, i still dont really know what this team is, exactly. I mean, six weeks ago, all anyone could talk about was the powerful offense, and flawed defense. Now, what are they?

    w
    v

    in reply to: around the league, going into week 17 games #154218
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Lions
    Eagles
    Ravens
    Bills
    Bengals
    Rams

    Those are the only teams i could see upsetting the Chiefs. It annoys me the Bengals arent even gonna make the playoffs. That would be a fun game. Chiefs vs Bengals.

    Anybody NOT picking the Chiefs to win the AFC ?

    w
    v

    in reply to: setting up ARZ game (which was moved to Saturday) #154217
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    So if the Seahawks were to lose to the Bears (unlikely, i know) would that clinch it for the Rams? Or is it more complicated. Does the Winter Solstice come into play? Penguin migration patterns? Is the last tiebreaker the number of roughing penalties against the long-snapper?

    w
    v

Viewing 30 posts - 61 through 90 (of 11,196 total)