Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,361 through 6,390 (of 12,329 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Waldman, Benoit, Baldinger … on Rams, Goff, the Saints game #78151
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Wentz … a more talented thrower, too.

    ================

    Mmmm…i dunno. Its complicated. Wentz is a more ‘powerful’ thrower for sure.
    But there may very well be ‘plays’ that Goff can make that Wentz cant. I’m thinking of Goff’s footwork and release.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    To me its always McV-Wade. Like with DV-Martz. Its the combo.

    And why in the hell Denver let Wade walk away is beyond me.

    The Rams got big breaks with other teams stupidity:
    Buffalo, Cincy and Denver all made bonehead mistakes imho.

    Whitworth, Watson/Woods, Wade.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can we beat the Cardinals? #78137
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    When’s the last time the Rams beat a division team twice in one year?

    Its time to start sweeping teams.

    Heck back in the 70’s the rams would beat the same team four or five times
    in the same season.

    w
    v

    in reply to: So who really was William Shakespeare? #78088
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    shakesp:https://www.nosweatshakespeare.com/resources/shakespeare-facts/

    “…William Shakespeare Facts: 7
    There are more than 80 variations recorded for the spelling of Shakespeare’s name. In the few original signatures that have survived, Shakespeare spelt his name “Willm Shaksp,” “William Shakespe,” “Wm Shakspe,” “William Shakspere,” ”Willm Shakspere,” and “William Shakspeare”. There are no records of him ever having spelt it “William Shakespeare”, as we know him today.”

    “…William Shakespeare Facts: 14
    Sometime after his unsuccessful application to become a gentleman, Shakespeare took his father to the College of Arms to secure their own Shakespeare family crest. The crest was a yellow spear on a yellow shield, with the Latin inscription “Non Sans Droict”, or “Not without Right”.

    William Shakespeare Facts: 36
    The moons of Uranus were originally named in 1852 after magical spirits from English literature. The International Astronomy Union subsequently developed the convention to name all further moons of Uranus (of which there are 27) after characters in Shakespeare’s plays or Alexander Pope’s The Rape of the Lock.

    in reply to: Chris Simms says Rams are cheating #78087
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I’d like to see a rule change where the OPPOSING coach gets to have the 15 seconds in the quarterback’s helmet-phone-thingy.

    Or maybe a random fan in the crowd gets to have the 15 seconds. Or a home-viewer.

    Or a celebrity.

    Gotta change with the times. Progress, and all.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Sure. I think McV is very aware that players are not cylons.

    I also think McV’s offense is all about ‘spreading the ball around’. Goff is the ‘point guard’, etc.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Eli benched #78066
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i think of it more as ‘the saving of Eli’ as opposed to the ‘benching’ of Eli.
    Geno is gonna get bulgerized.

    I’m sure eli wants to ‘compete’ but i think this is the best thing for him and the giants, for now. So i disagree with Kurt, who said “shame on the giants’.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can we beat the Cardinals? #78063
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Rams 20
    Cards 17

    w
    v

    in reply to: Act of Killing #78019
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I watched Oppenheimer’s “The Look of Silence” this week.

    Probably the best film I’ve seen in…years. Words fail me.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Rams line up quickly so Sean McVay can call audibles #78018
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I’d be very surprised if McV was the onliest coach doin that. Doesnt seem like rocket science.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”
    ― George Orwell, 1984

    in reply to: Silver: Rams' defense roughs up Drew Brees, Saints #78004
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I keep replaying somethin the great marshall faulk said on tv a few weeks ago — He said “I hated playing Wade Philips teams.

    That carried a lot of weight with me.

    w
    v

    in reply to: reactions to the Saints game #78003
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I havent seen it yet. I’m using an old slow computer at the moment till my other computer gets fixed. This one wont do video.

    But i read some of the articles and its a great win. A big fat meaningful win for this new team, in this new McV-era.

    I wasnt sure what to expect. Payton is a fine coach. A Super Bowl winning coach. And McV didnt get himself outcoached.

    I guess this proved the Rams can slow down a great offense, and they can win games against great-offense/mediocre-defense teams.
    The Viking game proved they can stumble against great-defense/ordinary-offense teams.

    I guess the Card game is a classic ‘trap’ game? Everyone is talkin about the Eagle game. Lets hope the players can focus on that ugly, brutish, nasty, mean, low-down, bastard Cardinal team.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can we beat the Saints? #77947
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I have no feel for this one. I was gonna pick the Saints but with their two top CBs out, i dunno.

    I think the Rams have to win one of the Vikes/Saints/Eagles series.

    If they cant win one of those, i cant take them too seriously as actual contenders this year. Ya know. They can still be fun-wild-card contenders but thats about all. I’ll take it 🙂

    w
    v

    in reply to: So who really was William Shakespeare? #77878
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I wonder if stephen king is really stephen king. I mean, how could the man who wrote ‘The Stand’ also write ‘Blockade Billy’ ?

    ————

    PS, this guy ranks Kings books
    King:http://thetruthinsidethelie.blogspot.com/2013/10/worst-to-best-stephen-king-books.html
    …and puts this one at number One:

    in reply to: Three Billboards Outside of Ebbing Missouri #77875
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Yeah I’m looking forward to seeing that one.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Have a good thanksgiving friends #77874
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Happy Day of Mourning,
    people.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Why the Rams offense struggles against better defenses.. #77836
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Rams offense has managed only 3 TDS against the Jags, Seahawks, and Vikings. On a podcast a couple weeks ago Keyshawn Johnson commented to DeMarco Farr that McVay’s offense was built on scheming receivers open. But he felt good defenses would be able to take that away. He said receivers have to be able to win individual matchups against good defenses.

    Is that one of the reasons the Rams offense has done so poorly against the better defenses? Because the Rams receivers can’t consistently win one on one matchups?

    ———————-

    I think we are still learning what the rams are. I think Keyshawn is on to something. McV has outschemed a lot of teams, but good coaches are gonna adjust to what he’s doing, and its gonna be up to the players to win one-on-one matchups, in general. (teams are certainly gonna study what Minny did)

    The Viking/Saint/Eagle run is gonna expose whatever weaknesses the Rams have — and the next set of games after those three will also show us whether McV can bounce back make some ‘re-adjustments’.

    I like this team. Its a fun team. Its got some weaknesses though.

    I do hope they sneak into the playoffs this year. I want them to get that pressure-experience this year. It would serve them well.

    w
    v

    in reply to: laram (& others) on goff … goff watch week 12 #77835
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well LA knows a lot more about football than i do, and i dont disagree wiht him on Goff, but my own wording is just that, Goff is still very very raw/green/young and this is his first year with real weapons and first year in this system, and yes he has miles and miles to go.

    But we see some elite skills from him most weeks, in flashes.

    Right now though, McV is protecting him and making things easy for him, i assume. Limiting him. I dont see a QB that really knows what hes’ doing — I see a young, green, raw QB with elite skills, in a great system, struggling, learning, flashing.

    We dont know his ceiling. But the signs are hinting thats its a real high ceiling.

    I think LA is prettymuch saying the same thing, in his LA-way.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Can we beat the Saints? #77804
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Of the three games — Vikes, Saints, Eagles — the one i thought they’d win was the Viking game.

    Ah well.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    “…McVay’s system, in which he’ll often have two sets of route combinations: man-coverage-beaters on one side of the field, zone-beaters on the other…”

    Interesting.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Fisher debate (Zooey, and whoever)…jump in #77524
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, No-one on this board would ever say, “Fisher would NOT have won more games, if he had a No.1 QB starting and an uninjured OLine”

    Of course he would have ‘won more’. But thats pretty vague stuff — he ‘would have won more’. Sure. He would have won ‘more’.

    My thing on Fisher is not that he was horrible or a terrible coach etc. I think you can lump him in with dozens and dozens of “ordinary, garden-variety, average NFL coaches”.

    I saw nothing SPECIAL about Fisher other than one quirky thing — trickery on special teams. Fake punts, that sort of thing. Other than that, he just seemed “ordinary”. Which means he could be outcoached by the really good ones imho.

    Now when i watch McV i see…special. I see a guy who knows how to get weapons OPEN. Also, the team seems to commit fewer penalties and comes out of the gate ready to play. They were ready to play after the bye. They were ready to play in London. Mainly though its his offensive scheme and the fact he put together an awesome coaching staff. And he works well with Snead apparently. And he was smart enough to keep Fisher’s special teams coach.

    Fisher = ordinary
    McV = Much higher ceiling, maybe even elite coach.

    These are my impressions. Not sciency facts. Not trying to ‘persuade.’

    I think people are too hard on Fisher, and too breezy about their analysis of his tenure, and they ignore all the circumstances — but still, i think he was nothing special. And McV is special. I’m a believer.

    PS — in the end Fisher HAD to go. Even if one believes he’s totally just a victim of bad luck, sometimes a team just needs a new spark, the fans need a new spark. I was sick to death of lookin at him. He became a symbol of futility. like…um….Milli Vanilli, or Theon GrayJoy.

    w
    v

    in reply to: 3 Billboards #77520
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    in reply to: Can we compete against the Vikings? #77518
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Vikes lead series 26-16-2
    Rams have lost the last four.

    alltime series:http://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/los-angeles-rams/teamvsteam?opp=18

    2015 – 18-21
    2014 – 34-6
    2012 – 36-22
    2009 – 37-10

    in reply to: Saffold an underrated cog in the Rams o-line #77492
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    i think Hav is the weak link now. He certainly had a hard time with Clowney, i guess.

    Clowney to Hav was like Kearse to Miller.

    I doubt Hav has a hard time like that with everyone,

    ==============

    Agreed.

    I would love to see the Houston line still have JJ Watt. I think it would be fun to see Clowney and Watt together now that Clowney has really come into his own.

    I still think Hav is the weak-link. I dont mean hes bad, just that i think the others are more athletic and I think he will struggle more than the others.

    If Whitworth went down, who would play LT, btw? Saffold?

    w
    v

    in reply to: Saffold an underrated cog in the Rams o-line #77489
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The media-celebrities almost always talk about Whitworth. Its like “Whitworth and the other guys”

    And Whitworth has indeed been a star. But the interior of the line has been great too, imho.

    Sometimes i think Hav is the weak link now. He certainly had a hard time with Clowney, i guess.

    I really hope the draft a T with their first or second pick. Just in case. Maybe a Center/guard too.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    in reply to: Can we compete against the Vikings? #77445
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Starting with the Vikings, it is like being in the playoffs.

    =============

    Damn. I didnt realize the Titans were doing that well. Man O Man.

    That is the toughest stretch I’ve ever seen the Rams play. Ever.

    I’d be happy with 4-3.

    w
    v

    in reply to: What a team! … reactions to the Houston game #77425
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Two more wins and we leave the Fisher-Zone. Ie the 7-9/8-8 zone-of-mediocrity.

    I do believe 9-7 is attainable.

    w
    v

    Way to stick your neck out.

    You mean…with 7 games left, including the 49ers and Cardinals, you think the Rams might win two of them?

    ====================

    I just watched the game on replay. It just keeps sinking in, how important Whitworth is. I really hope they draft a LT with their first pick because I’ve discovered….and I’m going to go out on a limb AGAIN — an LT is important.

    Of all the players on this team, i think they can least afford to lose their LT. Even if Goff goes out, i think Mannion would be ok. But if Whitworth goes down…I dunno.

    Draft another LT.

    w
    v

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I dont remember the last time a Ram schedule played out this way — three division leaders clustered closely in the second half of the year. All meaningful games.

    Couldnt be more fun.

    Anything can happen. Three close wins. Three close losses. A gazillion other scenarios.

    Looks to me, like the Viking game would be the best chance at a win. I just dont take Keenum seriously. Maybe i should.

    w
    v

    in reply to: Fisk on Hariri's 'resignation' #77412
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    This Hariri thing is a very strange story. I imagine the MSM is ignoring it. I dunno.

    w
    v
    ============

    How the Saudi Plot to Topple the Lebanese Government Backfired

    by Robert Fisk

    The Saudis may be holding the Lebanese Prime Minister hostage but their apparent plan to topple the Beirut government has gloriously backfired. Far from breaking up the cabinet and throwing Hezbollah’s ministers to the wolves, the Lebanese nation has suddenly woken up to what it’s like to be united – against the Saudis. The Lebanese government has announced that it does not accept the resignation statement which Saad Hariri was obliged to make in Riyadh, and overnight hashtags have appeared on several Beirut streets saying “kul na Saad” – “We are all Saad”. Even the Sunni Muslims of Lebanon are furious at their Sunni counterparts in Saudi Arabia.

    President Macron of France was first off the mark by detouring into Riyadh on his way to Dubai to ask 32-year-old Crown Prince Mohamed bin Salman what on earth he was doing. Almost the entire two-hour meeting was taken up with why and for what Hariri has been detained – or constrained, or kidnapped or held hostage or treated as an honoured guest of Saudi Arabia (take your pick). For the Lebanese government – and for many tens of thousands of Lebanese – the Saudi decision to present Hariri with a resignation letter to read on the Arabia television channel was a national insult.

    The greatest fear in little Lebanon now is that the Saudis, having told their citizens in Beirut to leave the country – there are in fact very few here – will demand that more than 200,000 Lebanese citizens in the Gulf leave Saudi Arabia. These are mainly middle-management people in banks and government, and Saudi Arabia could scarcely do without them. But such an order would have a grave economic effect on Lebanon. The Prime Minister’s “captivity” – albeit luxurious, since he is at home with his wife and children – has prompted customers to withdraw hundreds of thousands of dollars from his BankMed in Beirut.

    US, British, EU and French diplomats have been allowed to visit Hariri, but former French President Nicolas Sarkozy was refused a visit when he was in Riyadh on the grounds that this was a “purely internal Saudi matter” – which it clearly is not. To have Saudi officials now trying to dictate the make-up of another Lebanese government suggests that they want to take on the role played out for decades by pre-civil war Syria. The Crown Prince may think he is as powerful as Hafez el-Assad used to be. But the Lebanese do not want to be tutored again.

    Hariri’s next visitor is likely to be the Lebanese Catholic Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai, who is due in Saudi Arabia on an official visit on Monday. Rai is an ambitious and unyielding cleric who has apparently been told he can see Hariri – though why the Saudis have the right to decide if a Lebanese patriarch can meet his own prime minister remains one of the Kingdom’s current mysteries. Macron apparently called Donald Trump in China and asked him to phone the Crown Prince prior to his arrival in Riyadh. We do not know what Trump said.

    But he has already blundered with his usual laziness into tweeting his support for the Crown Prince. Of the princes, ex-ministers and officials under house arrest for alleged corruption, he said that “some of those they are harshly (sic) treating have been ‘milking’ their country for years!” But Trump obviously did not know – or care – that one of those detained princes, al-Waleed bin Talal, is an American citizen. Thus has the US President potentially accused one of his own citizens of corruption, words which might help to imprison him.

    However, the Department of Home Truths – an institution I regularly visit when writing about the Middle East – would suggest that the Hezbollah are not guiltless in this little drama. They deeply angered Hariri earlier this year when they staged a press trip to southern Lebanon to show journalists armed and uniformed Hezbollah fighters in the UN peacekeepers’ zone along the Israeli border. And some of the speeches made recently by the group’s chairman, Sayed Hassan Nasrallah, gave the impression that he thought he was himself the president of Lebanon – the real job is held by ex-General and now President Michel Aoun – or even the prime minister.

    And now one more small touch to add to the slightly grim moment of Hariri’s detention just under a week ago. The Lebanese Prime Minister – for thus we shall still call him since he was given his resignation statement to read – wears his very expensive and smart watch on his right wrist. And when he read that statement, the watch was gone. Just as his mobile phone and those of his bodyguards had been taken when his plane arrived in Riyadh last week. Hariri can use his watch to record or even make calls. But when, shortly afterwards, he was filmed meeting King Salman, the watch was back on his wrist. No problem now, it seemed. After all, he had by then resigned.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,361 through 6,390 (of 12,329 total)