Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,411 through 1,440 (of 2,078 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: physics in Ant-man (spoilers) #27389
    PA Ram
    Participant

    You were thinking a lot deeper about the physics than I was, but it’s interesting.

    My question was why didn’t he just give Ant-Man’s suit wings? Why make the poor guy have to play rodeo on the back of other insects?

    Anyway–the film was, okay.

    I just don’t see this guy carrying his own film. I’d like him better in The Avengers in a supporting role.

    He’s no Iron Man, that’s for sure.

    Also–the villain is…meh.

    Like I said, it was okay. Not great.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Gregg Wms. breaks down the Rams base 4/3 #27381
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I don’t often think about JL’s role in calling the defensive plays but it is such an important role on this team. It’s a lot of responsibility. He really is a coach on the field.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    PA Ram
    Participant

    Why have parties at all?

    Let’s just judge candidates on what they say, without them being labeled. So many people vote for brands without ever really learning about the candidates. Maybe people would have to pay attention more, I don’t know.

    This party system is cliquish and obstructing.

    I’m not sure of its value.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    PA Ram
    Participant

    Tre Gurley.

    No–they’re deep there. They have Todd Mason backing him up.

    I’m going to say it–Nick Foles. They need him to stay healthy because I’m not sold on Keenum and the rookie to lead this team to victory on a consistent basis.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: just the obvious stuff on the confederate flag #27286
    PA Ram
    Participant

    No the computer was used as an example of slave labor today. Yes, compensating lawful owners for lawful property would have prevented war. Apparently you are also against people being sold into freedom?

    No, I’m against people being treated as property. I thought that was clear.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: just the obvious stuff on the confederate flag #27282
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I thought you were comparing computers as property to people. You suggested that paying for the slaves(as property) would have been the way to resolve it. I just don’t agree that people should be sold as property. I don’t think it was right then–I don’t now.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Brandt on Rams on Jamon Brown #27264
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Sounds good.

    They really need these young guys to come together quickly.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: just the obvious stuff on the confederate flag #27263
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Slavery was practiced throughout the north before the Revolutionary War. It was also practiced in most of the world at that time. It is easy to moralize the issue today but at that time it was well entrenched. While I was making the list of countries abolishing slavery it was not a cut and dry proposition as was done in the US by war. Slavery was whittled away slowly piece by piece (by an amazing array of strategies employed) elsewhere over the decades until it lost prominence in political and economic circles at which time it was formally abolished in all its forms. Saying that I do believe the computer I am using now is a product of modern day slavery but that is an issue for another day.

    I’m not so sure there are any John Browns running around demanding we “free the computers”, but obviously people knew slavery was wrong back in those days. It was a moral issue then. Even after the Revolutionary war, some legislation was passed and abolitionists wanted slaves free. I don’t think they can hide in moral ambiguity of the time. So yeah–“paying for people” just legitimizes them as property. It’s as true then as it is now.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: just the obvious stuff on the confederate flag #27258
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Odd that the north was willing to fight to preserve the union (and end slavery) when just compensation instead of spilled blood would have sufficed. In the case of the southern plantation owner the end of slavery was already at hand due to emerging technologies.

    Yeah but paying for humans just makes them property–not humans.

    They should never have been property in the first place.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: just the obvious stuff on the confederate flag #27256
    PA Ram
    Participant

    When I was attending Louisiana Tech during my brief higher education days, there was a professor who insisted it was about the right to secede. The south insisted they had the right to secede. The north said they didn’t. He didn’t mention slavery very much. That was his story and he stuck with it.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: So Google is mapping my every move? #27254
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I know. I should know where I’ve been, I hope. There’s a lot of power with collecting personal information.And money. Oh–you want to sell protein supplements? Well, here’s some information on people who go to the gym regularly. We’ll sell it to you.

    Yep.

    The future.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: So Google is mapping my every move? #27250
    PA Ram
    Participant

    http://www.cnet.com/how-to/how-to-delete-and-disable-your-google-location-history/

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: So Google is mapping my every move? #27249
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Just posted the above on ROD but wanted to share it here.

    Here’s how to turn it off, if it’s on.

    https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/3118687?source=gsearch

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Cosby #27174
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I can’t say that Cosby was ever much on my radar.

    I didn’t watch “The Cosby Show”, never really heard any of his comedy albums, or even watched “I Spy”. If I saw him it may have been on a talk show or of course his commercials.

    People tend to think they “know” celebrities.

    It’s hard enough to really know your friends sometimes.

    A lot of show biz types–particularly comedians, have issues. At least it seems that way to me.

    I think the fetish point is a good one. Cosby clearly could have had a lot of women without the drugs. It was less about sex and more about something else, or so it would seem.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Pierre Paul has right index finger amputated #27101
    PA Ram
    Participant

    How can a professional athlete or anyone really, be so careless.

    People do know these things blow up, right?

    I believe that C.J Wilson lost a couple of fingers too.

    Just DUMB.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Always a hard day #26900
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I wish you all the very best, Mac.

    My mother is gone now but years ago I had to go through this. We were taking care of her in my home and we just were not equipped to do it. It’s more than just the home care, it’s making sure she gets to all her doctor appointments, watching her meds, etc. Ultimately we all knew that she’d be better off in a nursing home.

    She resisted at first but she knew it was for the best and she agreed and it turned out to be better than she thought it would be. She made friends, had social activities. She had her medical care and we could still visit, still(while she was able) take her places, and she was much better off than living with us.

    But yes–it’s a difficult time, for sure.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by PA Ram.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Happy birthday, Rams huddle the 2nd #26871
    PA Ram
    Participant

    2 years old?

    Hah! I’ve got socks older than that!

    Granted, they aren’t in the best of shape–but I’ve got them.

    In any case–thanks zn and RM for making this place possible.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: time for the "how did you become a Rams fan" thread #26845
    PA Ram
    Participant

    This is the culprit:

    r

    Collecting stickers for the book with a friend. He was a Vikes fan so I was a somewhat fan cause I didn’t know any better. Then I got the Rams stickers and fell in love with the horns. Bought Pro Football preview mags. Taped the players to my wall and was hooked. Rams were my team.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: RIP my sister Carol #26800
    PA Ram
    Participant

    So sorry to hear that. My sincere condolences.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Jurassic World #26645
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I saw it also and the bad science put me off.

    Yeah, I know, why does a movie with dinosaurs have to be scientifically accurate? Normally it wouldn’t have to be but Spielberg set the standard when he released Jurassic Park in 93 and lauded how scientifically accurate it was. And he was right. With a few exceptions the portrayal of the dinosaurs were pretty accurate for what we knew at the time.

    But Jurassic World is a major step backward. The depiction of the dinosaurs hasn’t kept up with recent discoveries. In some aspects, they’ve even backslid into the 50’s. For example we know that dinosaurs could see color and that the ceolurosaurs, which is the theropod clade that contains velociraptor and tyrannosaurus were feathered. Birds are in this group too. Therefore, the most parsimonious depiction would be colorful and fuzzy raptors and tyrannosaurs. However they remain portrayed with the same monotone scaly integument as they were when they were first discovered decades ago.

    And where did they get the mosasaur? First of all, the one in the movie is about two or three times bigger than the largest ever discovered. It was ridiculously huge. Regardless, they were ocean going creatures that most likely never came ashore even to lay eggs because they gave birth to live young. So when would a mosquito have the opportunity to bite one? Remember, that’s where the DNA comes from for all these beasts…ancient mosquitos trapped in amber. Plus, are they really going to feed it a great white shark? It would be illegal anyway because they are on the endangered species list.

    An Indominus rex was a major disappointment. More like Indominus blech. Very uninspired rendition of a dinosaur. It would look more at home in the next Godzilla movie with its ridiculous opposable thumb that NO dinosaur ever possessed. They did sort of skate around the scientific accuracy issue when BD Wong’s character stated that none of the dinosaurs were natural. They all had DNA from other organisms incorporated into their genomes to fill in the missing pieces with a focus on the maxim that bigger and badder was better.

    Anyhow, based on the above you probably think I hated the movie. I didn’t. I actually enjoyed certain aspects of it like the humor that you mentioned. And I liked the ending. But I would have enjoyed it a lot more if the scientific accuracy of the dinosaurs had been given priority as they were in the original Jurassic Park film.

    I did not take the science or anything in the film seriously. I caught on early that in order for me to enjoy it I would have to view it as a spoof. And it worked brilliantly at that.

    As I said, I really did not have any expectations and would not have seen it if not for my daughter. But I can understand how you could be disappointed if you had something more serious in mind.

    The series has lost Michael Crichton so that probably left a science void and they decided just to make it up as they went along. It wasn’t important to the filmmakers. It was all about the spectacle of it all. They liked the idea of a SeaWorld scene so they threw it in.

    But this is the type of film, if taken any way seriously will quickly fall apart. I actually said to my wife:”It was so bad it was good.”

    And I really meant that.

    Some of that I do believe was intentional.

    It worked for me.

    On another note: Saw Jaws today and that film still holds up well. The movie theater was packed. People still love it.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Jon Stewart on Charleston #26589
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I absolutely get his frustration.

    It’s more than just a mentally ill individual.

    This country is mentally ill.

    It’s kind of why I feel it’s rather hopeless to expect things to change. Yes–there ARE good people here. But the culture is not healthy. I don’t know what can change that.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Why didn't Sandy Hook change anything? #26576
    PA Ram
    Participant

    i dunno. I dont have anything ‘new’ to say on the subject
    of violence in America. I assume we all agree there
    are gigantic underlying causes that have very very little
    to do with whether or not the “gun laws” are loosened or tightened

    I do agree that there are many underlying causes, from mental illness(to me anyone who does this sort of thing is at some level of “crazy”)to a flash of anger to some sort of religious or political agenda to whatever.

    But I would be content to see a world without guns–at least the people killing kind. Weapons that were designed to kill humans are tools used by these madmen so maybe tightening gun laws WOULD help in some instances. I’d certainly like to see it tried. What’s the alternative? Acceptance? No other country does it quite like this. I’m embarrassed and saddened that our country embraces the gun culture so tightly.

    Of course if a guy wants to kill someone he’ll find a way to do it with or without these weapons. But in most cases it will be harder, more people will live. Guns are extremely efficient at killing.

    This is what we do though. We deny, we argue and finally, we accept. That’s what Americans do.

    “We need our rights and this just comes with it.”

    “Global warming, MAY be happening but there’s nothing we can do about it.”

    “The rich will always get theirs and that’s just the way it is.”

    Obama has addressed gun violence 14 times since taking office.

    The American attitude to this is more guns–everyone armed. That’s how OUR country thinks about these things. Instead of less guns the answer is MORE guns. To me, that’s insanity. I believe this country is insane.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Why didn't Sandy Hook change anything? #26545
    PA Ram
    Participant

    This little “oversight” perfectly sums up this country:

    r

    In case you can’t read it–that’s a gun ad stuck over the headline about the church shooting.

    Sad.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Why didn't Sandy Hook change anything? #26298
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I’ve never been convinced that the 2nd Amendment means that no matter how far technology progresses(some futuristic nuclear rifle?)that it’s basically your right to have access to any of it for “personal protection” because you fear…whatever. Earlier Supreme Courts didn’t look at it that way.

    It certainly isn’t good for the country or humans in general.

    We live in a country of very fearful people. They will hug their guns tighter than their children.

    I don’t see the point of large magazines or assault weapons. If you’re THAT fearful of your government that you think you’ll be going to war with it or only that type of weapon can protect your family, well, good luck with that. You’re screwed.

    I wouldn’t worry though–this country isn’t giving up its guns anytime soon–no matter how many Sandy Hooks there are.

    So yes–this fourth of July–with all the fireworks there WILL be guys out there shooting a gun in the air. Just celebrating their RIGHTS. Hopefully no one is killed.

    r

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Christopher Lee passed away. #26112
    PA Ram
    Participant

    He’ll always be MY Dracula.

    r

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: The Martian trailer #26008
    PA Ram
    Participant

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    PA Ram
    Participant

    I read the letters in U.S.A. Today and I kept wondering about how well, or how terribly that particular prison is run. They don’t seem to have much control. Basically constant lockdowns or fights. What a mess. It doesn’t sound like Phillips wanted to be part of that–and if it’s kill or be killed, well–there’s not a lot of choice there. It’s a shame that things have to ever come to that.

    I know nothing about the prison system beyond what I read.

    Years ago, when I got out of the air force, I kept getting letters from California prisons basically pitching jobs to me. All I could think of was how I could never imagine myself working in a place like that. Life can be depressing enough–but having to go into that every day?

    We have the highest prison population in the world. Something is wrong somewhere.

    I suppose with “for profit” prisons in the mix we won’t be seeing a change anytime soon.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    PA Ram
    Participant

    Okay–I HOPE this is the best defense in the NFL. They could be. Maybe. But I get a sense that Andy Benoit is getting excited watching the defense take some practice snaps against one of the WORST offenses in the league–a changing one at that, and making proclamations they may not be able to live up to.

    I don’t think anyone doubts the Rams have some real talent on defense. There is absolutely the potential to be the best.

    But they also have some weak spots.

    I’m not sure at all that the linebackers are an elite group.

    I believe the secondary could be REALLY good this year but let’s face it–this defense starts with the line. If they aren’t getting pressure it’s a problem. And teams love to use quick hitters on the Rams and we’ve seen that be effective. Also–occasionally the Rams have had trouble with stopping the run.

    If you have one elite unit the other teams can coach around that.

    The Rams have one elite unit right now.

    They HAVE to dominate.

    If they do that then yes–this defense can be special. There may not be another team with the defensive line to compare to the Rams–but if they have better overall balance it may not matter. As a whole, they could outperform this defense.

    So yes–the Rams COULD have the best defense in the NFL this year.

    And either way I’m sure it’s going to be a good, solid defense.

    But for now, I’ll hold off on those lofty expectations. I do know that part of this is really with the offense. If the Rams run a ball control offense that keeps the ball away from the other team, it’s the best defense of all. That will raise the defensive stats in terms of yards allowed without the defense ever stepping on the field.

    But we’ll see.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    in reply to: Oh yeah! #25947
    PA Ram
    Participant

    I’m really excited about this. This is one of those timeless films. My son and daughter grew up loving it and they only saw it on television without experiencing the amazing cultural shock the the summer of “Jaws” created. Getting to see it with them at a theater will be great.

    This film is ALWAYS in my top five films.

    Nittany makes a good point about the shark’s mechanical difficulties. That turned out to be one of the great “happy accidents” in the history of film making. It wasn’t just the shark, of course, it was the great characters and the three brilliant actors who brought them to life. Shaw used to pick on Richard Dreyfuss all the time, which helped to create a bit of tension between them–which the characters had onscreen.

    I agree with the modern CGI–don’t ever want to see it. The film is perfect as is.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pC3bh0Yj-Fs

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by PA Ram.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    PA Ram
    Participant

    I’d say Aaron Donald is a sure bet.

    Quinn(like Nittany says, already there).

    Gurley.

    Tim Mcdonald.

    After those guys it gets a bit iffy.

    I DO love Gaines. If he gets even better look out.

    I HOPE Robinson can do it but I have to see a lot more.

    Ogletree needs consistency.

    My two longshots:

    Brian Quick. IF he comes back and picks up where he left off, who knows?

    Janoris Jenkins. He has the physical tools–he just mentally loses it.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

Viewing 30 posts - 1,411 through 1,440 (of 2,078 total)