Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 781 through 810 (of 3,583 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I agreed with them. Cept, I understand ‘why’ American are ‘stupid’ and ‘dont care’.

    Corporate-Capitalism made them stupid and selfish.

    w
    v

    I’m probably over-generalizing here but I think Europeans are more community-centered than Americans. Americans tend towards individualism.

    Europeans travel a lot more than Americans. Visiting other countries gives you a whole new perspective on things. It promotes thinking globally. It helps you care about how stuff impacts other people.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    What does this mean? It means ALL PLANNED, PERMITTED AND UNDER CONSTRUCTION fossil infrastructure must be CANCELLED.

    Ok, so there’s still hope then.

    We just need to shut all current and future investments in fossil fuel energy down.

    Whew. I was worried there for a minute.

    in reply to: Season Storylines #101754
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Will Jared Goff’s performance as ‘young Bill’ in the upcoming film, “Bill and Ted 3” outshine his performance on the field?

    in reply to: Rich people more likely to be unethical #101721
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The homeless are more likely to steal food than a rich person; a rich person is more likely to commit insider trading than a homeless person.

    One of those crimes is an act of desperation, the other is an act of pure greed.

    But I agree it’s complicated and that character is more a of a product of one’s financial status than some intrinsic moral code.

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101678
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The question though is whether the show itself stuck to the “animal” thing or violated it and suddenly had the dragon acting on the basis of some kind of reasoning. After all it’s magic…maybe it’s capable of resenting the thing that in the end destroyed Dany. It’s even there in the room or what’s left of the room in the first place because it sensed something was wrong.

    Oh sure, if you want to create some sort of fantasy world where dragons are capable of high order reasoning…

    in reply to: tubman vs jackson #101677
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    If you see the sperm-egg combo as the beginning of human-life…then….Ya know. Genocide.

    w
    v

    Between 50 and 80% of fertilized eggs (sperm-egg combo) fail to implant and are spontaneously aborted.

    On top of that, 1 in 4 pregnancies end in miscarriage.

    Man, God must hate babies.

    The question isn’t about when life begins. Yes, in the technical sense a fertilized egg is alive. An unfertilized egg and a sperm cell are alive too for that matter.

    The question is do the rights of a fetus trump the rights of the woman carrying that fetus?

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101671
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    One thing that didn’t come up in discussion…the dragon not torching Jon Snow for killing Daenerys. Well maybe part of it is that Jon’s a Targaryen, and the dragon can sense that. He won’t torch family. Another thing is, it’s a very unexpected and interesting move that it torched the throne. Now one part of me said, that’s a little schlockey, and are we to believe dragons can reason like that? But most of me went, interesting. The dragon in its grief and rage destroys the thing it believes really killed Dany. Throughout the series dragon fire was used to destroy Dany’s enemies, and the dragon basically went, well here’s your real enemy right here (desire for power). I found I was actually touched and moved by that and saw it as a very appropriate, resonant, and effective twist. I liked that moment.

    I really liked that entire scene. It was visually very beautiful, and moving. I knew either Jon or Dani was going to kill the other during their embrace. Jon went there with the purpose to kill her, but I thought Dani might kill the rightful heir to the throne first.

    Since Jon was a Targaryen, could dragon fire even kill him? Can he withstand fire like Dani? Even so, the dragon still could have rendered him limb from limb, so I agree that Drogon spared Jon because of who he is. I don’t know if Drogo’s destroying of the throne was intentional or if it was simply directing its grief and anger away from Jon and the throne happened to be in the way. Although intelligent, the dragon is still essentially an animal. I’m not sure that it would understand what the throne represented. But obviously the melting of the throne was symbolic.

    in reply to: anti anti-vaxxers memes #101622
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Ff

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101475
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Nothing particularly unexpected happened. Acting was solid and it wrapped the series up nicely.

    Now looking forward to ‘The Long Night’…the GOT prequel premiering on HBO sometime in 2020. Btw, the name of the series hasn’t been decided for sure but GRR Martin wants ‘The Long Night’ so…

    in reply to: J.Oliver:green new deal #101382
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Yep. All energy sources and energy production modes plus all utilities should be nationalized and publicly owned.

    For one thing, none of it should be competing. They should all be collaborating under the umbrella of rational policies.

    And of course none of it should be profit driven. Rational planning, not profit.

    Cause. I mean. Jeesh.

    Well said. I would put you in charge if all this if it were up to me.

    Your official title would be Director of Energy Resources and Scorpion Ballista Deployment.

    in reply to: J.Oliver:green new deal #101354
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Something that serious ought to be owned by the ‘people’ and not a corporation.

    w
    v

    Of course YOU feel that way, Fidel.

    Actually I’d be cool if all energy was nationalized. We need to fast track new technologies. I’d like the government to prioritize energy research like they did the first moonshot. I want them to create a NASA for renewable energy. It’ll never happen, because unlike the ‘Space Race’, renewable energy is the enemy of a large portion of the government that’s committed to maintaining the status quo (fossil fuels).

    in reply to: J.Oliver:green new deal #101336
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    That was really good.

    Along with a carbon tax we need to continuously look to improve upon existing forms of renewable energy and develop new technologies. But any serious proposal to stop climate change must include nuclear energy. Global electricity usage is projected to increase by 50% in the next 20 years or so. Wind and solar power alone simply cannot accommodate that demand. Nuclear energy could and it produces zero carbon. Nuclear energy has its own challenges (nuclear waste, etc) but we no longer have the time to ignore viable options no matter how unpopular they might be.

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101306
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    This story was always a tragedy.

    I think it’s a comedy of errors about incompetent military tactics. For example if you are going to defend a walled city against dragons by relying on “scorpion” ballistas, then, don’t just put them on the walls where they can be attacked from behind from the air. Put some on high points inside the city in groups of 4 facing every direction.

    See I knew that. Why didn’t they know that.

    [\quote]

    Ah, but that’s also part of what makes it a tragedy.

    If they had deployed the scorpions as you suggest, Darnerys and Drogo would be dead, the relatively benevolent Cercei would still be queen, and about 8 or 9 hundred thousand innocent people would still be alive.

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101304
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The Ending of Game of Thrones

    <Warning – spoilers galore if you are not up to date>

    I always knew, deep down, that Game of Thrones (GOT) would not have a happy ending. Once Ned Stark got his head cut off at the end of the first book/season, I think everyone knew this was a different kind of fantasy story. I read the books first, and as I did it became clear that I was reading a tragedy and a horror story, not heroic fantasy.

    I have a few thoughts I would like to share as the last episode of the series is ready to air. The people I watch the show with had a range of reactions to the second-to-last episode, but I think it was completely consistent with the story George R.R. Martin has been telling us all along. He has been deconstructing the medieval fairy tale right in front of our eyes, hitting us over the head with the reality that we already know. It’s interesting how difficult it can be for many to just accept that.

    The final delusion was that Martin would bring it all back home. In the end the heroes would defeat evil, a good person would sit on the throne, and a golden age would dawn – it’s the Lord of the Rings ending. But come on – didn’t we all know this story was not LOTR?

    First, the Night King, the White Walkers, and their army of the dead was always a side show, even if it was the most captivating. Most of the series has focused on the title action – a game of thrones. I liken the Night King to a natural disaster – it’s looming in the background, some are warning of it, but mostly people ignore it while they focus on their short term politics. In the end we are really not prepared when the disaster finally arrives. The living actuality lly straight-up lose the battle of Winterfell. (Don’t get me started on the terrible battle tactics: opening with a frontal cavalry charge, putting your troops outside your own choke point, and not opening with a sustained artillery bombardment, etc. – but that’s a side point.)

    I think the lesson there is that death comes for all of us, and the best we can really do when we confront it is to either say, “not today,” or to face it bravely. Somehow life manages to keep crawling forward. It’s like the Plague, in the end it’s a distraction from what we are really interested in, our political battles.

    Getting back to the eponymous main story, Martin has, through his characters, pretty much told us directly how this world works. It is brutal and heartless. Power is all that matters – power through wealth, ruthless cunning, personal prowess, and force of arms. If you think about every character arc in the story, the more brutal and selfish they are, the more they succeed. The more kind, honorable, and trusting they are, the more the world chews them up and destroys them.

    Take almost any character – Tyrion used to be much more cynical, and earned a reputation for being cunning and ruthless when he had to be (as Daenerys recently noted). As he has become more and more concerned with the populace, with being a good person, the more hapless he has become. All this has earned him was a string of failures. Arya succeeded because she became a deadly assassin. Sansa went from a naive girl to a savvy politician.

    There are some good people in the world (Davos, Brienne) but they are generally at the mercy of those in power. They have no personal ambitions, really, and try to stay in the background serving others.

    You survive in a brutal world by being brutal. The world hardens your heart, or it kills you. The other thing you do to survive is to cling to those around you, your family, your people. Don’t trust outsiders. The point is made many times. The North doesn’t trust southerners. Jamie says all the horrible things he did he did for his family, with no regrets, and he’d do it again. In the end he had a choice between the honorable Brienne and family, and he chose his sister. Even Tyrion chose to save his remaining family in the end. The Starks reestablished their power and defeated their foes by staying loyal to each other. Theon realized in the end the Starks were his real family, and his tragic failure was in betraying that.

    So how does one win the game of thrones? I think Martin is trying to say that you don’t. The game itself is broken. At best you can have temporary success, if you are able to climb on top of enough other people, but your success is never stable. In order to maintain power you need to perpetuate the brutality and inherent injustice of the system.

    The Targaryens were able to unite and rule Westeros because they had dragons – the ultimate military power in this world (as we just saw again in the latest episode). When the dragons died out, their downfall was inevitable. Daenerys can only reestablish Targaryen rule by bringing back the dragons. The Lannisters were a powerful house because of their gold mines. When they dried up, their days were numbered.

    What is interesting is that as viewers of this show, from our 21st century Western vantage point, we know this world is broken. The answer is not to put a relatively benign brutal dictator on the throne. Daenerys said it herself – her goal is not to win a turn of the wheel, but to break the wheel. Unfortunately, she did not do that. She just gave it history’s most brutal turn. She convinced herself that to save future generations, she had to burn this one to the ground.

    There are only the faintest glimmers of a real solution in the world. The Brothers without Banners are onto something by disavowing all feudal ties. Sandor Clegane (the Hound) recognizes that all knights and nobles are “c@#nts”, and wants no part of it. We come to respect this initially villainous character because he gives us a rare glimpse of someone who realizes the world is broken. He doesn’t have a solution, however, just personal vengeance and more cynicism.

    Varys is genuinely concerned for the people, but his solution is to support the best brutal dictator. Even Jon Snow, perhaps the best of them, condones capital punishment for minors, leads thousands of his soldiers to their death because someone pissed him off, and is OK supporting a queen who immolates those who don’t bend the knee to her. To him honor is being the one to personally swing the sword when you order someone’s death for, say, abandoning their post.

    There isn’t a single truly virtuous ruler by modern standards in this story. Just shades of gray.

    What Westeros needs is a revolution. They need a philosophy of enlightenment, a Magna Carta, something that truly breaks the wheel of totalitarian rule. They need to replace the rule of men with the rule of law. That is their only hope. This is why the rule of law is so precious – a fitting lesson for this time, and perhaps any time.

    The totalitarian rule of people has no happy fairy tale ending. Deep down we all know that. We all saw this coming. Martin told us directly countless times in the telling of this story. But still, we want the fairy tale. We want the good guys to win in the end. But Martin is making a strong point – in this system, one ruled by the game of thrones, there are no good guys. There are relatively more or less brutal people, and the more brutal people tend to succeed over time.

    This story was always a tragedy.

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101296
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The best ending we can hope for….

    hh

    in reply to: Ye Favorite Songs of old: Crow on the Cradle #101284
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    One theory I have heard is that in the rough waters, it was possible that both the bow and the stern could have been raised by the crests of huge storm waves, and in that case the ship was so heavy with ore that when the middle of the hull was suspended over a deep trough it would have just snapped in half.

    That sounds reasonable. The wreck was found in two pieces, snapped in half, almost through the exact middle of the ship.

    Ss

    in reply to: Ye Favorite Songs of old: Crow on the Cradle #101278
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I saw Gordon Lightfoot perform live sometime in the late 80’s. He has a few songs I really like, but none more-so than The Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald. He really paints a picture with that song.

    “When suppertime came the old cook came on deck and said Fellas it’s too rough to feed ya.
    At 7pm a main hatchway caved in, he said Fellas it’s been good to know ya.”

    Agreed.

    More:

    They might have split up or they might have capsized
    They may have broke deep and took water
    And all that remains is the faces and the names
    Of the wives and the sons and the daughters

    Lightfoot changed some of lyrics in deference to the wives of two of the lost sailors. The wives were upset with the line, “at 7pm the main hatchway gave in…” because their husbands were responsible for the main hatch and they thought it implied that their husbands were at fault for the sinking.

    So now the line is “at 7pm it got dark and then…”

    The new line doesn’t flow as well or evoke the powerful imagery of the original, but it was cool of him to do that for the widows.

    in reply to: Ye Favorite Songs of old: Crow on the Cradle #101271
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I saw Gordon Lightfoot perform live sometime in the late 80’s. He has a few songs I really like, but none more-so than The Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald. He really paints a picture with that song.

    “When suppertime came the old cook came on deck and said Fellas it’s too rough to feed ya.
    At 7pm a main hatchway caved in, he said Fellas it’s been good to know ya.”

    in reply to: I break my vow #101237
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Oh, in the spirit of spreading more sunshine, here’s how the elephant in that commercial was probably trained…

    in reply to: I break my vow #101236
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Well. Another walking-on-sunshine post from Cappy.

    I talked to Mother Nature just last week, btw, and She said she cares deeply about dung beetles.

    w
    v

    It’s not nice to lie about Mother Nature.

    You know how angry she can get.

    in reply to: I break my vow #101229
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Mother Nature is completely indifferent as to our or anything else’s existence. We will eventually destroy ourselves and take half the life on earth with us but Mother Nature will just keep chugging along, and in a couple million years the earth will be repopulated with new life and all traces of our having existed will be gone save a few fossils.

    I heard someone on NPR say he thinks there’s a good chance we’ll take military action against Iran. To be fair, we are currently fighting in 7 other Muslim countries, so it would be bad form not to bomb Iran also. This is not a time to stifle the momentum of ‘Inclusivity’ that has a tenuous hold on the public’s consciousness.

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101218
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    • This reply was modified 5 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101198
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    in reply to: Can you trust science #101189
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator
    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101113
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101030
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #101019
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Who said there were no franchise coffeehouses in Westeros?

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #100971
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    the brightend battle of winterfell

    That lighting is much better. Makes it easier to discern what is happening in key scenes…the dragon fight, Arya and the Night King, etc.

    Wait a minute…

    If the Night King is dead, then how is wv still posting here?

    His laptop should be buried under a couple thousand ice cubes.

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #100945
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I think the Hound made it. He still needs to settle matters with his brother.

    Yeah, the Hound’s destiny is to fight his brother. It’s been my prediction since before they announced that season 7 was the final season that the Hound would die from wounds he suffered while killing the Mountain in battle.

    I can picture him dying with his head cradled in Arya’s lap or something.

    Of course, very little of what I predicted for this show has come to pass, so…

    in reply to: Anybody watching Game of Thones? #100910
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Are ALL the Dothraki dead?

    w
    v

    No.

    Just the ones that followed Daenerys to Westeros.

Viewing 30 posts - 781 through 810 (of 3,583 total)