Keep Barksdale, Britt, Kendricks and Harkey, sign Wisnewski, draft QB, LB, OL, win Super Bowl.

Eezee Peezee.

znhater wrote:

It’s just to me this should be a non issue.

That’s fine. As long as you acknowledge that there are a myriad of opinions on this subject that are equally as valid as the ‘non-issue’ viewpoint. Some of us find the term Redskin to be self evidently offensive due to its historical connotation. Yeah there are native Americans who don’t really care about the word but there are also native Americans and others who are offended by it and their opinions have to count for something too, right?

sdram wrote:

I like it when the Rams are able to keep the players they draft and develop.

I like it when the players the Rams draft and develop are worth keeping.

• This reply was modified 10 years ago by nittany ram.

You show the Rams going sack less against the Cardinals but they recorded three sacks that game. I think all of them were on Palmer. Remember it was
Barron’s sack that ended Palmer’s season.

I met him at Herdfest. Jeff was an extremely knowledgable poster. Knew a lot about the Rams and football in general. He was also a huge Motley Crüe fan. RIP Jeff.

Even if you believe Wilson’s version of the events, you still can’t argue with the fact that race is a factor in police shootings. Blacks are twice as likely as whites to be shot by police.

http://m.journal-news.com/news/news/crime-law/race-a-factor-in-police-shootings/njHYM/#__federated=1

Although not a victory, I think an honorable mention should go to the 24 – 24 tie in San Fran in 2012. Besides, only the score says it was a tie. Anyone who watched the game would tell you the Rams won.

This game served notice to the rest of the NFC West that the Rams would no longer be out-physicaled by their opponents. It also established my favorite attribute about the Rams under Fisher. Don’t ever count them out, because when you assume they are dead and lean over their apparently lifeless body they will smack you in the face. The Rams had lost three in a row coming into that game and had no business thinking they could hang with the best team in the NFC in their house. But from the opening drive to the disappointing finish in OT the Rams out-hit and outhustled the 9’ers. SJax was a beast and they should have erected a statue of Danny Amendola after that game.

Of course, the following week the Rams established another pattern under Fisher…inconsistency. They got hammered by the hapless Jets in the ED.

Nittany is an anti-Clownite.

With good reason…

They’d be 2-9. Those three clowns would really fuck things up.

Awesome! I’ve only been to one game where Rams fans out-numbered the opponent’s fans and that was at the original Herdfest – a home game for the Rams. I have to say it’s much more enjoyable to watch a game that way for obvious reasons. It was cool to see there were so many Rams fans at the San Diego game.

Yes it is as you and TD say. He was released Oct 30th. I learned this through the dark and arcane art of “looking it up”.

This “looking it up” you speak of…do all of your people possess such lore?

Your ways are strange to us, Portlander.

Obviously no playoffs this year. I think we’re probably looking at 8-8, gentlemen.

One game the Rams could point to as their “superbowl” would be the Seattle game. How cool would it be to sweep the Superbowl champs?

Especially if the Seahawks need a win in that game to make the playoffs.

I want them to make Pete Carroll cry.

Patterson would have been the better choice.

wv wrote:

nittany ram wrote:
That second gif shows Hill against a blitz. The safety walks up to the line to make it look like he’s blitzing, At the snap of the ball the safety drops back into coverage but all three LB’s blitz. That makes a total of seven pass rushers. Hill calmly and quickly reads the all-out blitz and hits the hot receiver in single coverage across the middle before the safety can help.

I don’t want to make too much of this (it was only one play) but this is an example of a QB reading the blitz while keeping his eyes downfield and knowing where he’d have single coverage and making a decisive throw. If he had hesitated the safety coming to help would have broken up the pass or he would have been sacked. In other words, Hill did just the opposite of what Davis has been doing against the blitz. Davis never seemed to anticipate the blitz and instead of finding his hot receiver he would hold the ball and/or try to bail out of the pocket. The entire time his eyes would be on the pass rush instead of looking downfield.

Again, it’s only one play but it’s lightyears away from what we’ve been seeing with Davis.

One wonders how it is
that Davis did so well
his first few games.
I mean, surely teams were
blitzing the youngster in those games.

w
v

The Rams could run the ball in their first few games. That’s why Davis did so well. Play action was working. When they started playing better defenses and they couldn’t run anymore, defenses could exploit Davis’ weaknesses, which is specifically, an inability to stand in the pocket and read a defense, especially when he’s hurried by a blitz.

• This reply was modified 10 years, 1 month ago by nittany ram.

Silent but deadly?!

You compare the greatest WR in Rams history to a particularly nasty type of fart?!

You really do hate the Rams, don’t you.