Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 85 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: remaining picks, day 3 #150509
    Maddy
    Participant

    Hey old pals – long time. I’m reminded, with all these late picks, of the fairly extensive evidence that ZN produced a few years ago concerning the quantity and quality of OL prospects available as late as undrafted free agency. If I recall, the evidence involved already-productive NFL offensive linemen and their draft positions. If that information still has any bearing on current draft conditions, I would be pleased to have the Rams mine those OL deposits in rounds six and seven.

    in reply to: Rams win #136470
    Maddy
    Participant

    I feel a shared sense of joy with this place and you folks.

     

    That was outstanding. The big guys had big moments. The opening of the second half was a nightmare, but the defense did it’s job. That winning drive was a masterpiece.

     

    High fives and fist bumps all around.

    in reply to: judgments & analysis of the trade coming in #127582
    Maddy
    Participant

    Good to be back!

    in reply to: judgments & analysis of the trade coming in #127517
    Maddy
    Participant

    Ha! This site was unavailable to me for a period of time, like it had been dismantled and terminated. I tried to find this crew as I have in past migrations. Couldn’t find you guys. I thought it was over. Then I just tried again and here it was!

    in reply to: judgments & analysis of the trade coming in #127497
    Maddy
    Participant

    “Sure, the Rams save cap money by dumping Goff’s contract to Detroit, but they now have $42.2 million of salary cap room with Stafford’s $20 million salary, and the cap is expected to drop. The floor for the 2021 cap is $175 million, with most people around the league thinking it will be set around $180 million, $19.2 million less than the 2020 season.

    Anything over 15 percent of cap room tied up in a quarterback makes it hard to keep players or sign free agents. Stafford’s salary and the dead money the Rams take on by sending Goff to Detroit will eat up 23.4 percent of a $180 million cap.

    The Rams are currently $35 million over a $180 million cap, third most in the league. It will be hard for the Rams to re-sign players, and they have 13 unrestricted free agents this offseason.”

    So, are the Rams better or worse off cap-wise? Would most of this be true if they kept Goff?

    in reply to: Donald (march thread) #84462
    Maddy
    Participant

    in reply to: reactions to the Seattle game #79034
    Maddy
    Participant

    Love them fortyburgers

    Maddy
    Participant

    Is there one citizen who is pro-repeal of net neutrality? I can’t think of any reason why any person would be for it, and I can’t think of any reasoning that suggests that it is for the greater good. If it were put to a vote, it would be a near-unanimous decision to uphold net neutrality. And yet, our representatives may approve the repeal, as they approved allowing our internet info to be exploited a short time ago. Nobody wants it, but we all will get stuck with it. It is what experts in the field refer to as “fucking bullshit.”

    in reply to: Fisher debate (Zooey, and whoever)…jump in #77523
    Maddy
    Participant

    Fisher on defense liked the hard-hitting, risk-taking schemes and squads. We got some very good defense in the Fisher years, but some reckless, penalty prone defense as well. He went and got good players on that side of the ball.

    Special teams were solid under Fisher.

    I felt like he was the reverse Martz when it came to offense. He wanted clock management and no turnovers. He wanted to run and set up the play action. That’s fine, and when it occasionally worked, it seemed sensible. But whatever role he played in drafting offensive talent did not pay dividends. My sense was that he handcuffed his offensive coordinators, or Shurmer anyway, who I felt wanted to do some things he was not allowed to do.

    I am probably swayed by the fact that, in one offseason, a rookie head coach identified receiver and tackle as offensive needs, and was able to get it done. The new guy also opened up the offense and it hasn’t killed the defense, because he went and got a guy who’s good at defense, and let him do what he knows how to do.

    That may not be fair to Fisher, who may not have had the same opportunities to get players, and who suffered through rashes of injury, but there it is.

    in reply to: GIANTS GAME reactions #76931
    Maddy
    Participant

    I give this game a solid ‘D’ for strength of opponent, and a solid ‘A’ for not playing down to them.

    I was also reminded of a 3rd and 38 play the Falcons got against us way back when. I looked it up. It was week 8 of the 1980 season:

    The Falcons had a 3rd and 38 from their own 19 before Steve Bartkowski hit Alfred Jackson twice, on a 27-yard pass play to the 46 and, on 4th and 11, the winning 54-yard bomb.

    I feel a cathartic purgation of that childhood memory today, even though it was not against the Falcons.

    1980 was also the year Jewerl Thomas lit up the Cowboys on MNF. And we swept the Montana Niners. Then got beat by Dallas in the playoffs. That year.

    in reply to: Russia thread #76884
    Maddy
    Participant

    dumb question: what is RT?

    in reply to: black holes, gravitational waves, n other stuff like that #76711
    Maddy
    Participant

    Those are my two favorites. They’re long, but it doesn’t even matter. They discuss many different tangents. I love it when they discuss artificial intelligence. On a separate topic, in another podcast, Rogan has on Graham Hancock, along with Randall Carlson, and brings in a debunker of what those two put forth. The best that comes out of that is a discussion of an ancient monolithic construction that is about 6,000 years older than the ancient pyramids, Gobekli Tepe, which I had never heard of. Mind blowing stuff.

    in reply to: black holes, gravitational waves, n other stuff like that #76710
    Maddy
    Participant
    in reply to: black holes, gravitational waves, n other stuff like that #76709
    Maddy
    Participant
    in reply to: black holes, gravitational waves, n other stuff like that #76688
    Maddy
    Participant

    I lurk. I’m a taker. I steal my takes from this board. I lack my own original thoughts. This place works out perfect for me.

    in reply to: black holes, gravitational waves, n other stuff like that #76685
    Maddy
    Participant

    So much fascinating stuff. I love listening to podcasts with cosmologists talking about these things. Joe Rogan has a couple – Lawrence Krauss, Sean Carroll, N D Tyson. I can’t pretend to understand quantum mechanics or astrophysics, but not all of it goes over my head.

    Maddy
    Participant

    Hey, some gun violence data is being interpreted in that article. That’s illegal.

    in reply to: George Will leaves the GOP #47135
    Maddy
    Participant

    George Will has written some stuff I like, but it was about baseball. I Disagree with his politics.

    I agree with most of what bnw says above, with small difference of opinion in terms of jobs. Maybe the refugees would damage the job market, but I feel that the fears surrounding refugees are exaggerated, or exacerbated, in the media.

    My biggest complaint about loss of jobs is with employers who pay little or no taxes, enjoy the benefit of a military who protects their global investment climates, and yet ships jobs overseas. They avoid picking up the tab for the military on the front end, and then they avoid hiring the guys who go offer their lives to protect their interests on the back end. That’s fucked up. And it is all George Will’s fault I guess is my point.

    in reply to: time to take the political compass poll again #46704
    Maddy
    Participant

    Never mind. I guess one of my previous tries actually worked.

    in reply to: time to take the political compass poll again #46702
    Maddy
    Participant

    I am just useless with posting images. -5.25; -6.46. Those coordinates are supposed to be some of the best ones out there. Really high-end.

    in reply to: time to take the political compass poll again #46699
    Maddy
    Participant

    Maddy
    Participant

    Pretty civil discussion about an emotional topic. Kudos. I see the heat, anger, frustration, and stuff, but you guys keep a good lid on it. The discussion usually devolves way before this.

    Anyway, if I can weigh in with a point of view that has already probably been reflected, I will share my thoughts.

    I don’t want to take away rights. This is a country that has guns. Guns are a part of this country’s culture and identity. I also don’t think there is any real campaign to take everybody’s guns away.

    But I think there is a reasonable level of regulation, and it seems clear that tighter restrictions are in order. I think registering weapons, background checks, safety training, and that kind of stuff is just obviously in order. I am no expert on current regulations.

    The argument against further regulations, when I have personally had the discussion, is that it isn’t fair to punish law abiding citizens for the actions of criminals. I understand that to mean that the registration, background checks, and stuff like that are taken as punishment. I don’t see it that way. I’m not claiming that that is the only counter-argument, or that I understand it correctly.

    Also, I have heard it repeated that if a killer is going to kill, he doesn’t need a gun, and regulations and restrictions will be of no use. I don’t think tighter regulations will end all gun violence. But what if it reduces gun violence by some percentage? I think it is reasonable to expect that it would.

    I’m not against concealed carry, because I know some concealed carry folks, and they are the people I feel comfortable carrying guns. That is an admittedly narrow-sighted view. But the training and education required for such a permit is a great idea, and I think gun owners should have to go through similar training and education. It is like saying: “yes, you have the right to own and operate this deadly weapon, but, because it is a deadly weapon, we can’t just take your word for the fact that you are good to go. So you can earn a permit.”

    I don’t understand how anyone can rule out the fact that guns play a part in the problem of gun violence. I hear it repeated that it’s not the gun, it’s the person. Why wouldn’t it be reasonable to think it might be a little of both, or at least that maybe it would be a good idea to take steps to make it more difficult for the wrong people to access guns? Sure, it would make it more difficult for everyone, including law-abiding gun owners, but isn’t that a small price to pay?

    Anyway, nice to see people fight nice.

    in reply to: day 3 thread #42967
    Maddy
    Participant

    CBS gave the Cooper pick an instant A+

    in reply to: board response to the NFL vote…Rams to LA #37091
    Maddy
    Participant

    I’m a California boy, been with the Rams since I can remember, back when they were in LA. I have to say I am not overjoyed by the news. When they moved to StL, it didn’t diminish my fanship at all, and this wont either, but, frankly, St. Louis deserves the Rams, and LA doesn’t. LA doesn’t give a shit. They’ve lost two NFL teams, couldn’t keep them, and never tried to get one back. Haven’t had a team in 20 years, and couldn’t have cared less. This hurts Stl more than it helps LA. I wish they would have stayed. I feel for the hometown fans, all the people who worked for the team or at the stadium during games, the beat writers, and everyone who’s gonna get stung. St. Louis is a better home. I see and hear local Ram fans all stoked for the return, even gloating. Not me. I wish they were staying.

    in reply to: 49ers vs Rams: posts about the game #33367
    Maddy
    Participant

    Does Gurley remind anyone of O.J. Simpson (as a running back)?

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33049
    Maddy
    Participant

    Also, I love that Gurley’s presence now sets up play-action almost before the game starts, before any running game is actually established.

    in reply to: Prediction Thread – The Francisco 49ers #33048
    Maddy
    Participant

    It’s a divisional game so it will be a war.

    The Rams rise to division games. That is their identity this year as much as anything else. The fact that this is a division game bolsters my confidence. I will be very surprised if the Rams come out flat. I see no reason why a focused Ram team wouldn’t be expected to defeat a focused Niner team.

    in reply to: WOW … (official Cards game after-thread) #31760
    Maddy
    Participant

    Barnes did big things on that 50 yarder. Helped a block, then made another block that helped spring gurley.

    Maddy
    Participant

    nittany ram wrote:
    If they broke that down by position and then did a top 10 (or even top 5) list for each position you would see the names of many former Rams players. Not just Orlando Pace.

    This is a big part of why I think an all-time Ram team would stand up to anyone’s all-time team. They’ve had great running teams and great passing teams. They’ve had teams that grind and teams that score at will. They’ve had great defenses. But they have had elite lines on both sides.

    If you put the Rams’ all-time offensive line in front of Warner, Faulk, and Dickerson, with Bruce, Holt, Hakim, or whoever you pick to catch passes, and put together an all-time Rams defensive unit, I’ll take my chances against anyone’s all-time team.

    Maddy
    Participant

    I have no idea about Mannion. The conversion chart for college QBs entering the NFL is a complete mystery to me. They “had” to take one, I guess, so they took the best of the leftovers. I hope he turns out good, but teams weren’t crawling over each other to get him.

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 85 total)