Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,421 through 6,450 (of 7,443 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30355
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    yeah three td drives against the best defense in the nfl. or at least top 3. without gurley and mason. and that backfield could be or at least should be the defining piece of this offense.

    impressive.

    but what they need to address is taking care of the freaking ball!

    in reply to: Wow, how thunk that? (Seattle game reaction thread) #30348
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    couple things.

    seahawks last year ranked 2nd in ypa allowed at 6.3. today the rams averaged 11.0 ypa. last year the rams had ypa’s of 8.2 and 6.6 against the seahawks. overall they had a ypa of 7.2. that was good for 15th in the league. hopefully, the rams can build on this.

    imagine how good this offense could look with gurley and mason carrying the ball.

    aaron donald is going to be the talisman of this team. he was unbelievable. shoot. that whole dline was unbelievable. no slow start for quinn. brockers with a huge stop at the end.

    • This reply was modified 11 years ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Rams inactives and other tweets #30313
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    reading about wichmann gives me some comfort should saffold go down.

    in reply to: TDs Rams offense gave up on INTs & FRs, from 2007 #30293
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    offense definitely needs to take care of the ball if they’re to win tomorrow.

    nick foles has thrown 2 ints for tds in the preseason already no? hope he got that out of his system.

    in reply to: setting up the Seattle game #30292
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the offense on the other hand. i fully expect it to take a long time before we see this offense in full stride. whether that full stride is effective or not remains to be seen.

    in reply to: setting up the Seattle game #30291
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    gregg williams’ motto. “start fast”. i’m hoping. this defense has to start fast. they should start fast. they should be embarrassed if they don’t.

    the leaders on this defense have failed if this defense does not finish top 5.

    regardless, it should be a fun season.

    in reply to: thinkin about the defense #30290
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know technical stuff, but i am even more excited than i was last year. maybe it’ll all end up being for nothing, but i haven’t been this excited in awhile.

    second year under the same coordinator. that’s huge. that’s something they haven’t had under the fisher regime, and i’m hoping that is the difference. they’ve been inconsistent every year under fisher. but maybe this is the year it changes. guys are entering their prime years at the right time and at important positions. again. quinn and donald should be better than they were last year. ogletree. you read good things about him this year as opposed to last year when he showed up out of shape. and in the backfield, mcdonald to some played like the best safety in the league in the second half of the season if you believe those sabremetrics.

    the one downside is losing gaines. i was really counting on him this year, but hopefully, joyner can emerge and offset at least some of that loss. long and laurinaitis are a year older. but the positives definitely outweigh the negatives.

    i’m hoping this is the year the defense finally steps up and becomes great.

    in reply to: Will the Rams beat Seattle? #30263
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    a healthy gurley and mason and i’d say yes, but since that it isn’t happening, i’ll say no.

    in reply to: FootballOutsiders 2015 Rams projections #30214
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    my guess is it relates to the division they’re playing in as well as strength of schedule overall. in an easier division, their mean win should go up and their playoff chances as well.

    playing against the number one team in seattle will do that.

    atlanta for example has some pretty weak teams in their division thus increasing their chances of winning and making the playoffs.

    • This reply was modified 11 years ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30159
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i hope that brady and belichick are never inducted into the football hall of fame. the writers should freeze them and anyone associated with those superbowls out of the hall of fame.

    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30119
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    not sure i buy that a fix was in but i do believe the patriots cheated.

    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30103
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i remember when the nfl insisted that concussions had no long-term effect on the health of football players…

    i’m sure the same goes that spygate had no effect on the patriots winning…

    • This reply was modified 11 years ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    all along people said the destroying of the tapes was inconsequential. i don’t buy it. the nfl is hiding something. wouldn’t be the first time.

    in reply to: Teams don't trust the Pats #30101
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    problem is those turnovers don’t exist in a vacuum. we don’t know what events, which could have been influenced by information obtained by the patriots spying, occurred prior to that which influenced what happened on any one of those turnovers. and not just the plays themselves. but even plays prior to those plays. unconverted third downs. third and longs. hits to warner. and even on the other side giving the patriots an advantage on offense.

    we’re just left to wonder exactly how much the patriots knew. and it only makes it worse that they only won by a field goal.

    in reply to: Aaron Donald gifs #30036
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the guy barely got a hand on him. he might not have. he tries to push him but completely whiffs and falls on his tummy.

    in reply to: Aaron Donald gifs #30031
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    that play on peterson was unreal. this season should be fun if for no other reason than to watch him play. quinn too.

    in reply to: I just don't see it. #30029
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i will say this. we’d be looking at this team very differently had bradford stayed healthy the past two years. very differently.

    and now they have foles who hopefully stays healthy and a running back as good as a steven jackson in his prime. if he stays healthy. the oline is a mess right now but it has seemed a mess for years.

    i don’t know what that adds up to.

    • This reply was modified 11 years ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: I just don't see it. #30023
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    fwiw:

    @nwagoner: #Rams rookie RB Todd Gurley says he has shed the yellow “no contact” beanie and there’s nothing he can’t do at this point in his recovery.

    i’d still keep him out until the oline situation is a little clearer.

    in reply to: I just don't see it. #29995
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    you’re right. they do match up well. and that’s why with the other factors in play there’s a chance the rams catch them by surprise.

    i hope. but that oline really worries me.

    in reply to: I just don't see it. #29990
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    one thing that gives me hope. seattle’s oline situation supposedly isn’t the best right now and they’ll be missing some key personnel on defense. so hopefully the rams are catching them at the right time.

    in reply to: some chatter about the OL #29942
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    so guesses on the starting center?

    i’m hoping it’s rhaney only because he’s the less known quantity. and in my screwed up logic, he represents more potential.

    on the other hand, that’s not a lot of game experience with rhaney there. so probably barnes.

    in reply to: Getting to the 53 man roster…. more cuts listed 9/5 #29941
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    overall i’d say it’s a good looking roster. lots of potential.

    and at first glance it looks like they got rid of some talented players. which is a good thing.

    now can they play?

    one thing that hurts is if they lose battle, they lose that draft pick. methinks they should have kept him if they think that much of him, but probably can’t afford the luxury at this point.

    in reply to: I just don't see it. #29910
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    but this oline seems to be total shit…

    I don’t agree. It’s not t.s. … IMO it’s raw and will have its moments. The upside promises a line that is not only solid, but 2 deep at back-up tackle, which is just plain rare.

    .

    well. a poor attempt at humor. i mean i obviously think it isn’t total shit as i do believe there’s a chance that it could come together mid-season. meaning i think there’s actual talent there.

    in reply to: Getting to the 53 man roster…. more cuts listed 9/5 #29908
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    wow. dunbar cut. i take this as a good sign actually. a sign of how deep the talent has become on the defense.

    in reply to: Getting to the 53 man roster…. more cuts listed 9/5 #29907
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    wow. jones cut. i guess that can only mean that the olinemen who beat him out were that good.

    or jones was just that bad.

    i’m hoping for the former.

    in reply to: I just don't see it. #29906
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    it’s an exciting season for sure. as it always is. but this oline seems to be total shit…

    i think if the oline can gel and gurley comes back legit, the rams can make a run in the second half. but will it be too late by then?

    in reply to: I just don't see it. #29876
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i agree with a lot of that. it might even take the first 8 games. i do think the defense still has a chance to show greatness, but this offense is going to be painful to watch for quite awhile.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    tavon also spent a lot of energy reversing field on that play. he may have started getting a little gassed at that point. the play says 40 yards but i wouldn’t be surprised if he ran closer to 70 yards.

    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think the oline will eventually be fine. we’ll see flashes. but it’s really gonna struggle at the beginning. feel bad for tre but hopefully they start coming around in the second half. i think this puts a big dent in their chances of a winning record. i hope i’m wrong.

    in reply to: foles to austin, 43 yards (& other highlights) #29822
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Nick Foles to Tavon Austin for 43 Yards

    Quarterback Nick Foles and wide receiver Tavon Austin connect on a 43-yard pass play in the first quarter.

    http://www.stlouisrams.com/videos/videos/Nick-Foles-to-Tavon-Austin-for-43-Yards/9fd71334-9bf9-47fc-8905-2f17da32e073

    this is the tavon austin i want to see in the regular season. we saw glimpses of it his rookie year.

    again. not expecting 100 catches. but if he can get about 50 receptions, 40 carries, and punt return duties along with a highlight reel of missed tackles i’ll be happy. anything more than that would just be gravy.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,421 through 6,450 (of 7,443 total)