Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 6,181 through 6,210 (of 6,770 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: 920 AM … Balzer #19600
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    from laram’s post it seems very unlikely stan would want to buy the raiders. doesn’t sound like the raiders would be very corporate sponsor friendly. and it sounds like the raiders will be staying in oakland anyway.

    i could see stan selling the team and buying the broncos. i think in that case the rams would be staying in st louis.

    in reply to: Will the defense improve in 2015? #19595
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    well. they’ve switched coordinators every year since fisher has been head coach.

    this year will represent the first year that they’ve had the same coordinator. i think that makes a difference.

    i think the following also has to happen.

    alec ogletree has to stay in shape. he’s got to be on top of it. he reported to camp out of shape and it showed. once he worked himself back into playing shape, his play predictably improved.

    they have to figure out what they want out of michael brockers. he lost 20 pounds prior to the 2014 season, and i believe his play suffered for it. get him back to his ideal playing weight.

    they have to find another corner to replace jenkins. i think what laram said is true. the guy gambles too much. getting a corner in the draft would be good. maybe they get waynes or kevin johnson.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Laram on JJ #19509
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    what does laram think about trae waynes?

    in reply to: Hey Larams! #19460
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    interesting. sounds like the carson site was never really an option.

    i also saw this link on that message board.

    http://www.kusi.com/story/28225234/local-business-man-to-help-keep-raiders-in-oakland

    looks like the raiders are staying in oakland.

    chargers are left out in the cold.

    rams are still in pole position to move to los angeles.

    maybe chargers end up moving in with the rams when all is said and done.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Vincent Bonsignore, LA Sports columnist #19366
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    that would confuse the crap out of me. i would eventually get over it. unless the rams. er i mean raiders won a superbowl. then i think i’d have to hunt kroenke down. and eat the toupee right off his head.

    it’s a nice looking stadium. look. i wouldn’t be disappointed if the rams stayed in st. louis. i love st. louis. and it really doesn’t matter where they play at this point.

    but just let me enjoy this team. just do that. i like this team right now. i like the players. i want to root for quinn and donald and the rest of these guys.

    i can only hope that the raiders and chargers work out a deal with their cities, and wherever the rams end up, they get to keep fisher and company.

    in reply to: Vincent Bonsignore, LA Sports columnist #19361
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    the raiders are worth 797 million. the rams are worth 750 million. i could see that happening. the rams staying in st. louis and kroenke moving the raiders to los angeles. he might actually prefer that as i think the raiders have a bigger following in los angeles. although that would majorly bum out los angeles rams fans.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: Mariota #19360
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i would trade up to the sixth spot to draft mariota. but i wouldn’t get into a bidding war with the eagles to do it.

    in reply to: "I love you guys" #19267
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think the biggest thing is laurinaitis and long while good are not great. rams need a player who is not only a leader but is also a great player. i don’t think it’s going to be quinn. doesn’t strike me as a leader type. i’m hoping donald can be that. he’s a lead by example type of guy. but also an elite talent. he sets the bar insanely high.

    so basically what hpd says.

    in reply to: Facts related to NFL relocations (and a prediction) #19168
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    kroenke might be a sociopathic asshole. but in a league of sociopathic assholes, he is an alpha male. and they will respect that on a certain level.

    unless spanos and davis can come up with a plan that is more impressive than kroenke’s.

    but like i said the chances have definitely increased on the rams staying in st. louis. i did not see the carson project coming at all. and there’s always the chance that the st. louis stadium happens.

    i also think this carson project increases the chances of kroenke working out some deal with davis where davis takes the st. louis rams, and kroenke moves the raiders to inglewood if davis can’t work out a deal in oakland.

    in reply to: "I love you guys" #19164
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think chris long is a leader. i think laurinaitis is. we’ll see though. they’re young. i think that’s their biggest downfall right now.

    and also they need a quarterback. and an offensive line.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photoInvaderRam.
    in reply to: La on Brockers #19162
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i think i tend to agree with ag. he’s young and relatively new to the position. i don’t think he played the position until his sophomore year. and then came out after his junior year i believe. i don’t think we’ve seen his best yet.

    in reply to: reporter tweets, he thinks Patz interested in Kendricks #19161
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i’d like the rams to keep kendricks. if they can’t keep kendricks, i’d like the rams to draft williams – the minnesota tight end.

    in reply to: Facts related to NFL relocations (and a prediction) #19160
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    They would favor the Raiders/Chargers over the Rams simply because St. Louis has offered a new stadium and SD and Oak have not. It’s the public appearance of the thing. The Rams’ move looks like the groom ditching the bride at the altar. Now they can spin that, and WILL spin that if the Carson project does not become viable in time, but with both projects viable, the jilting of St. Louis looks bad. And IS bad. They want LA, and they will jilt St. Louis if that is necessary, but they won’t jilt St. Louis if they can move other teams to LA with worse situations, and SD and Oak currently have no solutions on the horizon.

    I don’t know what you even mean by “qualified” owner.

    I think that if Carson falls apart, the NFL will back Kroenke’s move and try to lure either SD or Oak to St. Louis. Second choice would probably be to broker a deal where Kroenke and Davis trade teams and Davis keeps the Rams in St. L while Kroenke moves the Raiders to LA, or some variation of that.

    If Carson AND St. Louis fall apart, the Rams move cleanly into LA, end of story. Maybe the remaining team joins them there later.

    Kroenke will file to move at the end of next season, and the league will have to give him an answer. They won’t tell him No unless there is another LA plan nailed into place. There is no way the NFL does not have a team in LA in 2016. It will be the Rams, or the Chargers.

    yes. i should have said all things being equal. assuming that oakland or san diego come up with a stadium plan.

    i didn’t say a qualified owner. i said more qualified. and by that i mean the league wants an owner with a strong business sense. i think they want the team that’s here to have staying power. i believe the owners will think that guy is kroenke.

    i’ve read that davis is not highly regarded. they don’t think he’ll have the ability to run a quality organization. and that’s not what they want in los angeles. maybe that guy is spanos? i don’t know. spanos has complained about not wanting another team in the southern california area because he believes it will hurt him financially and now he’s in bed with the raiders? does that sound like a guy who’s going to lead a new team into the second largest market in america? maybe the two of them combined can make it work and will give the league optimism that a joint venture will work? i don’t know.

    i do know that kroenke has the financial might to do this on his own. he runs multiple sports teams. arsenal plays in london. a major metropolitan city.

    he’s the only one of the three owners who just went forward with his plans and is making something happen. like really just happen, and he doesn’t need the city to help him out. we all know the problems with the rams on the field. but if kroenke moves to los angeles and builds this stadium, the league can be fairly certain that the rams are here to stay. even when he passes on, his empire will pass onto his children. davis and spanos can’t compete with that. does that even matter? maybe it doesn’t. my guess is it does matter to the league.

    in reply to: Facts related to NFL relocations (and a prediction) #19150
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I tend to agree with all of that, too, with the exception of Assumption #5, and I am not sold on #3 or #4. I am not so sure that neither Oakland nor San Diego will come up with a stadium plan. St. Louis pulled one out when nobody expected them to.

    I think it is less likely that Oakland will come up with anything because Oakland is working on a new stadium for the A’s right now. I think I read that, anyway. But I would not be surprised by a San Diego solution that is the equivalent to the St. Louis solution.

    While I think the NFL would prefer the Rams to stay put, I think the likelihood of the Carson project unraveling at some point is greater than the Inglewood project unraveling. There are more variables, more ways the Carson project can go wrong. Kroenke’s stadium construction plan stops ONLY if he gets some other opportunity he likes as well i.e. the Broncos. While I have a hard time picturing Kroenke pulling an Al Davis and moving regardless, I also have an equally hard time seeing him settle for less than the vision of the Los Angeles Rams that he has created, drawn up, and planned for. Neither action seems in character for him. He has no history of going rogue, and he has no history of being denied. So either way, we are going to see something new from Kroenke. Remember how he got the Rams? There was Khan coming strong, and talk about cross-ownership impediments, and Kroenke can’t do it, and…BOOM.

    I just think the St. Louis stadium is “settling for less,” and I’m not sure he’s going to be happy with the runner-up proposal when there isn’t anything to stop him from taking first place in the beauty pageant except his own conscience. That biography of Kroenke I posted a few weeks ago portrays a man whose business approach is to make a business goal, and treat it like a fence post. You just keep banging on it, again and again, until you get what you want. He is steady, he is patient, and he is relentless. In the mean time, his stadium project is in the lead in the timeline. We’re at the quarter post, and Kroenke is in the lead by two lengths. Stopping Kroenke, I think, will require a firm and united NFL (if LA is what he truly wants, and all indications are that it is). I am not making a prediction on how this will end, but I will say that if Kroenke gets more than half of the owners – including some rich and powerful ones (and it appears he has Jerry Jones) – I’d be surprised if he takes No for an answer.

    I don’t think they are going to persuade Kroenke. They are going to have to compel Kroenke.

    He is not going to accept the Spanos/Davis LA “solution” as being more appropriate. What? They’re entitled to it cuz their daddies were pioneers, and they have family legacies, and they live closer anyway, and besides, they couldn’t get anything done in their hometowns, so they should get LA.

    Yeah, I don’t think so. The man is a sociopath, and he isn’t going to feel sorry for Dean and Mark, especially now that they are gunking up his business plan. The NFL is either going to have to forcefully stop him by making it too painful for him to move, or bribe him somehow, maybe by some ownership transfers that leave the Rams in St. Louis and Kroenke in LA with a different team.

    i still don’t understand why the league would favor a raiders/chargers move over a rams move. in fact, i’d see every reason to favor the rams move. kroenke would seem to be the more qualified owner. and the other team can always move at a later date and play in kroenke’s stadium.

    plus, the chargers/raiders move depends on BOTH teams actually moving which is far from certain while kroenke seems intent on pushing through with the stadium project. and this is the league’s best opportunity yet to finally have an nfl team back in la. what happens if one of oakland or san diego come up with a stadium plan? the carson site is nixed and los angeles is again without a team. and i’m fairly confident the league does not want that to happen.

    i agree with you. kroenke is a guy who is used to getting what he wants. the league also wants a strong owner in los angeles. spanos and davis don’t strike me as strong owners. at least in the business sense. kroenke might be a sociopath. but he’s a sociopath who gets things done. and that’d be just fine with the league.

    in reply to: Facts related to NFL relocations (and a prediction) #19148
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i want the rams to move to los angeles, but i think the chances of them staying in st. louis have increased dramatically. i still think they have the best chance of moving of the three teams.

    maybe it comes down to who can build the stadium first. right now it appears to be kroenke.

    also depends on how fast st. louis can get this stadium proposal off the ground.

    right now st. louis, the raiders, and chargers are way behind kroenke. i wonder if that wins votes with the league.

    in reply to: JT: Rams like Scherff #19091
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    Well, there’s some really nice
    options, here. I got no problem with the Iowa kid.

    Mariota is a bit of a wild-card,
    it looks like. He could slide
    just a bit. If he’s there
    at 4 or 5, I wonder if the Rams
    would trade up?

    w
    v

    if mariota dropped down to #5, i’d be disappointed if the rams didn’t at least try to trade up to get him.

    in reply to: JT: Rams like Scherff #19090
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t think i’d want scherff with the 10th pick. i’d rather trade down or pick best player available.

    i wonder if trae waynes is in the rams scope.

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #19081
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    forgive my ignorance but how does one file a referendum?

    do you need a specified number of people to file or can just one person file?

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #19080
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    m

    ah yes. that was a cool movie.

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #19057
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    http://deadspin.com/inglewood-decides-not-to-let-public-vote-on-rams-stadiu-1687940403

    oh so you just donate money to the campaign funds of the mayor and councilmembers…

    perpetual motion machine. why does that sound familiar?

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #19054
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i was thinking the same thing. how can you just bypass all those regulations?

    how long does it take to build a stadium anyway? i bet kroenke makes one in record time.

    in reply to: Robinson recovering from toe surgery #18962
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    all kidding aside. he just comes across as very mature. mentally tough. just a feeling.

    and that goes with all the freakish athleticism.

    i think his learning curve will be a very steep but rapid one.

    in reply to: Draft stuff after the combine #18961
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I’d love Cooper at 10. Love it. Good value there, imo.

    well right now i’m wondering if one of kevin white or amari cooper starts falling. probably not to the 10th pick though.

    i’d almost be tempted to trade up to get one of them.

    in reply to: Robinson recovering from toe surgery #18953
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i have a good feeling about robinson. last year was a big learning experience, but i bet this guy works his ass off and comes into 2015 a totally different player.

    in reply to: more combine stuff #18949
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    actually scratch that. i would also consider drafting shaq thompson and making him a 2 way player at linebacker/safety hybrid and running back.

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #18948
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i don’t know. i think st louis’ chances have improved. definitely improved. not sure by how much.

    i do think spanos is kind of dumb the way he’s playing this though. it could bite him in the ass.

    should be an interesting next couple of years.

    in reply to: Grayson, Hundley, Petty, Carden etc. … the qbs this year #18947
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    i gotta admit i’m fascinated with hundley. but i’d rather they trade down or get him in the second round.

    but yeah. i’d love to see him on the rams.

    in reply to: more combine stuff #18946
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    if i’m picking at #10. assuming no trades. i’m going offensive line or wide receiver. those seem to be the stronger positions in this draft. maybe i’m wrong.

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #18910
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I was thinking the same thing. It weakens his argument considerably. He came out and said, “Both the Rams and Raiders left LA, so it’s mine, and the Rams can’t have it, but the Raiders can.”

    It will be interesting to see if either Oakland or San Diego can come up with something now. They haven’t got much time. One thing is certain, Kroenke just pushed the boulder off the top of the hill, and things are moving.

    well i’m thinking this could end up biting him in the ass. if kroenke pushes full steam ahead, can spanos get other owners to agree that a move for the rams is not a good plan but moving in with the raiders is? his only argument now stinks of bs. meanwhile continuing to negotiate with their respective cities will only delay matters while kroenke goes about building in inglewood.

    in reply to: NFL will 'sweeten the pot' to keep the Rams in St. Louis #18901
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    what i don’t understand is spanos complaining about not wanting the rams to take away potential revenue from the chargers. and then he goes and agrees to go half on a stadium with his own division rival.

    what’s that about?

    anyway. for a long time i didn’t think it’d be possible for the rams to st. louis until i read this. st louis does seem to have a viable stadium plan when compared to oakland and san diego.

Viewing 30 posts - 6,181 through 6,210 (of 6,770 total)