Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 451 through 480 (of 504 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Evan Mathis anyone? #26297
    Hram
    Participant

    Is he a mauler? A good guard but I am not sure his style of play will fit this tea.

    in reply to: Ideally, you would start five tackles #26033
    Hram
    Participant

    It probably has something to do with athleticism, size and long arms, but what do you think he really meant by that comment?

    Hram
    Participant

    They have some serious young talent due to the extra picks from the RG3 trade and added to it this year with the cap savings from the Bradford trade. Plus, none of them are rookies and the coordinator is going into his second year with the team.

    Provided the offense can be close to average and they don’t suffer an undue amount of injuries, they should be a top 5 defense. Anything else would be disappointing.

    Hram
    Participant

    Hekker
    Zutlein
    And if only they could resign home one more time…Massey!

    in reply to: causes for optimism? #25498
    Hram
    Participant

    Good talented death at multiple positions even though they are young makes me optimistic. Plus they have not yet sustain any serious injuries.

    in reply to: How passing and rushing affect winning in the NFL #25055
    Hram
    Participant

    I think we should just figure out each week when we game plan how to score more points than the other team.

    Hram
    Participant

    We’ll be okay if the line stays healthy and if one of our three center candidates steps up.

    That’s two big ifs. Too much to make me confident.

    Hram
    Participant

    I like that they seem to go for extremely athletic potential all pros in the first round and did it again this year. I am very glad they did not reach to fill a position of need it in the first round.

    Love that they went ugly early with offense lineman who have experience and look good on tape. If even two of them work out, the Rams will be in good shape for the next couple of years provided they get adequate quarterback play.

    I appreciate how they drafted for their philosophy this year and that they stand a good chance of simply wearing teams out by the fourth quarter of games in the near future.

    I do not believe Manion will be a good professional because he is slow to read and slow to throw. However, he is very tall and if they can work on his mechanics and have a good running game so he can do play action, he may be good.

    Overall I love drafting a bunch of big uglies!

    in reply to: Snead on Sirius NFL this afternoon… #23604
    Hram
    Participant

    I am buying it in the top couple of rounds or the talent can be very high except for a few low density positions if you already have a young All-Pro there like Center or tight end. Otherwise if you have someone that is truly that much higher rank than everyone else even if it is not a position of need then you should take them. If you do not need them this year he will in one or two years.

    Very good starting quality offense of guards can be handled through the third round of this draft and they can always add a little bit to the money they are offering a Barksdale to get him to sign .

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #23487
    Hram
    Participant

    I think Mason started the first 4-8 games of the season. Gurley will probably start the 2nd half, but having Mason come in for 10-12 carries a game keeps the play action pass game going.

    It’s a deep draft for Olinemen, just not many that projected as strong first rounders.

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #23473
    Hram
    Participant

    ESPN said the Rams had Mariota 1 and Gurley 2. Regardless, if one of your top two guys is on the board at 10, you take him.

    Unexpected pick. But, if he comes back healthy (read a report that it was a clean ACL tear meaning not a lot of other collateral damage) and he’s projected as the best back since Adrian Peterson then it makes sense. BPA and fits with the team identity.

    Can get some damn fine Guards and centers in the 2nd and 3rd rounds this year. This draft is deep in interior lineman and I expect they will take at least one in the next two rounds and probably another by the end of the draft.

    Glad we didn’t reach for Oline help.

    Bet we come up with something Barksdale will agree to within the next couple of weeks. πŸ™‚

    Hram
    Participant

    I think he is probably somewhere in the top 20 or so right tackles in the league. Maybe top 25 but he does know our scheme coaches and players. Good enough to not be a hindrance if the rest of the law line is solid.

    I’d give him 4 million a year if I was a billionaire and had that much pocket change and Space.

    Hram
    Participant

    If he drops within range they should consider it. Giving him a redshirt year behind Foles would be the perfect start to this very hard working young player’s career.

    Hram
    Participant

    I would have paid more for Massey to come back. Still, if it is for the vet minimum it is probably a smart move. he knows the system, is a year older and stronger and can compete for a backup job.

    Hram
    Participant

    Well what the heck, I vote for giving him the less money now and not waiting until the draft

    Hram
    Participant

    Jack, Mariota played in a spread in college and, imo, would best be served by a redshirt year, but I disagree that he is a spread QB. I also do not think that if Bradford had been able to stay healthy that we’d be talking about him as a “spread” QB. Compare Bradfords rookie numbers to most rookie QBs even those that became elite. They match up very well.

    Mariota is bright, dedicated, a very hard worker and the consumate teammate. He also likes to win. He has a lively enough arm, throws pretty accurately on the move while keeping his eyes downfield and has great escapability. I have little doubt he will become comfortable taking snaps and being a pocket passer if that is what is asked of him. He work ethic is on the high end.

    Whether he will make it is another thing because there are so many intangibles that go into QBing in the NFL. But Mariota does have an awful lot of intangibles going for him. πŸ™‚

    Hram
    Participant

    I really do not think Huntley is going to make a good NFL quarterback. I watched a bunch of his games this year and he just does not seem to have it. He is athletic but I believe he lacks patience, speed of processing information and accuracy.

    I do not know anything about Grayson.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 2 months ago by Hram.
    in reply to: Lineman with Boudreau connection visiting #20906
    Hram
    Participant

    Cheap back up guard and third string right tackle. Worked with our own line coach before a couple of years ago

    And hacksaw’s son!

    Count me in. πŸ™‚

    in reply to: "The Trade" — Yes, or No #20654
    Hram
    Participant

    Good trade in my opinion because of Bradford’s injury history. We were giving him too much to take the chance on him if we could come away with a decent alternative. With this trade, we have a decent alternative.

    in reply to: Fairley #20429
    Hram
    Participant

    Fairly was a beast inside pass rusher and disrupter in college. He’s also a little bit of a knucklehead who doesn’t always work as hard as he should which is also evident in his weight problems.

    A perfect Fisher project.

    in reply to: should the Rams still draft a qb? #20427
    Hram
    Participant

    I’d take Mariota if he is there at 10 exactly because he wouldn’t have to play this year. The kid is smart and will put in the work during a redshirt year.

    I wouldn’t take any other QB in this draft earlier than the 4th round. I just don’t see any of them as being great prospects.

    in reply to: should the Rams still draft a qb? #20304
    Hram
    Participant

    Not sold on Mannion at all and I’m an Oregon State alum. He’s slow to make decisions and throw the ball.

    Good size, arm strength and decent velocity, but a little too much of a statue.

    Just don’t think he will ever be better than a below average backup.

    in reply to: Bradford to Eagles, Foles to Rams #19912
    Hram
    Participant

    If you believe Bradford can’t stay healthy, then this is an excellent trade. Between college and the pros he has lost three seasons already.

    I think he is a risk with a giant hit to the salary cap this year. So, while I believe it was best to roll the dice with him last year, I think it more prudent at his salary cap hit to make this trade this year. You can buy a lot of solid interior lineman with the money they just saved.

    Foles is probably an average starting QB. Somewhere around 15 to 20. If they fix the Oline, resign Brit and get an average starter at CB (things they should be able to afford now in FA, they can complete this year. They still have a lot of young and improving players.

    I dunno, straight up it makes enough sense. With the extra 2nd rounder next year, it is even better.

    Assuming Foles passes his physical, why not resign him for the next 4-5 years at around his current salary. High priced for a backup, but no crazy and extremely low if he starts. Then draft a rookie every year and see what you can develop. Spend the extra salary cap on resigning those you want to keep from the current roster into a second contract. Seems like a decent plan and if Foles does develop into a top 10-15 QB the team is pretty set into the future.

    Hram
    Participant

    I’m originally an Oregonian and watched a lot of PAC 12 this year.

    No way I would take Huntley. He has the physical skills, but he doesn’t process information very fast. If his first read isn’t there, everything breaks down for him and he is either inaccurate or runs. Not an NFL QB.

    Wouldn’t take Mannion. NFL size and arm, but everything is slow with him. He won’t make it with the speed of the NFL game. He just won’t.

    Mariota is the real deal, but the Rams have no shot. He needs a year or two in order to get used to taking snaps under center, but no one will out work him. He will put in the time and effort. His reads are quick and decisive (head coach said standing behind Mariota in practice that Mariota get to the 2nd and 3rd reads as fast as the coach). and he looks to throw first (even often when escaping the pocket he keeps his eyes downfield). He’s a safe bet provided he doesn’t get crushed or injured the first year of two

    in reply to: OMG! OMG! OMG! (Denver post-game thread) #12024
    Hram
    Participant

    How the heck did that happen!!??

    Peyton Manning was on the other team. Wow.

    Cool! πŸ™‚

    in reply to: Would you draft Tavon? #12023
    Hram
    Participant

    What I said before the draft. One of them would be there at #16. I would draft Patterson before Tavon. I liked them both. Nothing has changed for me.

    Yes, yes and yes.

    I didn’t like the trade up then and I don’t like it now. Could have had Patterson and kept the draft pick.

    in reply to: Rams beat SF celebration n discussion thread #11021
    Hram
    Participant

    WOOHOO!!!

    in reply to: What can we expect now? #10577
    Hram
    Participant

    At this point with those injuries, I think we’d be lucky to win 2 games. The over and under is probably set at 1.

    More high pics next year.

    If we can go relatively injury free at some point in the next couple of years and get even average QB play, we are going to be really good at some point.

    in reply to: Thots from being at the game. Momentum, heart, coaching #9831
    Hram
    Participant

    It really was cool and they seemed to still have fun together. Lots of smiles.

    In a way it reminded me of the commercial currently on t.v. where they all want to go back to college. Relive their youth. πŸ™‚

    Hram
    Participant

    From where I was sitting in the stands on Monday night, he looked like a #1 running back. Strong to the hole, good lateral movement, powerful and quick. Good running when he got the ball.

Viewing 30 posts - 451 through 480 (of 504 total)