Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 2,311 through 2,340 (of 7,618 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: game reactions…OAKLAND game #90665
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    yeah, talent took over in the second half.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams waive Demby, claimed by Lions… & other roster moves #90657
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    You know, Fisher was really good at moving players around at cut down.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: tweets n other bits … 9/10 #90645
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    The Raiders are the new Cleveland.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I don’t have a schedule, so I will probably watch the whole game.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: watching any games today? #90616
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I watched the 9ers, Cards, and seattle lose.

    Looks like Bradford is done don’t it.

    I always like Bradford, but yeah, it does.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: watching any games today? #90613
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I watched the 9ers, Cards, and seattle lose.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: watching any games today? #90597
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I might. I was just going to check what is going to be on.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: over.the.cap has 2019 numbers now w/ both AD & Hav #90596
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant


    This shows the Rams having 13 players in the top 65.6%. Of course, this will change in future years, since they extended Gurley, Cooks, and Donald.
    Check out the link to see how other teams and other situations make up the roster with various levels of compensation.

    link: https://overthecap.com/texture/

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams waive Demby, claimed by Lions… & other roster moves #90594
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think having 8 offensive linemen active is something they do if they use them on special teams, for kicking FGs, etc.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    https://www.silverandblackpride.com/2018/9/7/17821990/raiderdamus-friday-foretelling-raiders-vs-rams

    Raiderdamus’ Friday Foretelling: Raiders vs. Rams

    The Raiders may have just traded the best edge rusher in the NFL, but the Rams have avoided that problem by not employing any edge rushers at all. …..

    This is funny. Read the whole thing and look at the pictures. 😉

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams waive Demby, claimed by Lions… & other roster moves #90572
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Is this something that they were going to do anyway when Brown comes back? Saying it is tough to carry 3 rookies does not hold up for me. 4 rookies made the squad in 2015.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Chronicles of Amber will be the next Game of Thrones #90570
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I’d love to see that, but it has to be done right. BTW, what’s with the cartoons? Was there an Amber cartoon series back in the day?

    I don’t think so. There is a Russian video of the first book, but it is in Russian with no subtitles.

    This stuff is not as dark as ‘Game of Thones’, but I think that is a good thing.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams waive Demby, claimed by Lions… & other roster moves #90567
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I find that surprising. We have only 7 offensive linemen on the roster.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: McVay helped negotiate Cooks trade with Belichick #90562
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    just a kind of random question. is there any downside to converting salary to signing bonus? does he really need to be congratulated on that?

    NO. The player gets his money sooner, but the team gets to spread the cost over as much as 5 years.
    Say a player makes $9m this year. The teams says, hey joe, let me give you $8m of the $9 I owe you today. Joe says ok ;). The team can spread that $8m over as much as 5 years into the future. That takes money of this year and puts it into future years for cap purposes.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: McVay helped negotiate Cooks trade with Belichick #90545
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    http://www.latimes.com/sports/rams/la-sp-rams-brandin-cooks-20180908-htmlstory.html#

    Examining Rams’ biggest offseason moves: How they landed Brandin Cooks

    By Gary Klein
    Sep 08, 2018 | 5:00 AM
    Examining Rams’ biggest offseason moves: How they landed Brandin Cooks

    Fourth in a series

    After a flurry of offseason moves, the Rams begin the season with a remade roster that features newcomers in cornerbacks Marcus Peters and Aqib Talib, defensive lineman Ndamukong Suh and receiver Brandin Cooks. Here is the behind-the-scenes story of how each was acquired, in the voices of the people involved. Part 4: Cooks.

    April 3, Rams acquire Brandin Cooks and a 2018 fourth-round draft pick from the New England Patriots for a first-round pick and a sixth-round pick.
    Oakland Raiders v Los Angeles Rams

    Coach Sean McVay: Your interest in potentially acquiring him goes back to last year [2017], when you realize the Saints, I don’t know if they were shopping him, but you knew that you could potentially acquire him.

    General manager Les Snead: It started at the [2017 NFL scouting] combine [in Indianapolis]. It was Sean’s first combine and we were at this point where we were flirting with New Orleans about [Rams cornerback] Trumaine [Johnson]. And it started with us trying to grab Cooks. Then New England beat us for Cooks.

    VP of football and business administration Tony Pastoors: It was someone we explored prior to [trading with the Buffalo Bills for receiver] Sammy [Watkins].
    St. Louis Rams Headshots

    Executive VP of football operations Kevin Demoff: Sammy was a big piece of our division championship team.

    Pastoors: When we found out that he was going to leave in free agency [to sign a $48-million contract with the Kansas City Chiefs], it was “OK, let’s go on to what’s next.” First, in this draft, is there someone we can get at No. 23? Is there anyone in free agency?

    Snead: I called the Patriots about Cooks probably the night that Sammy agreed to go to Kansas City [March 13].

    McVay: When you end up losing Sammy, you’ve got some other avenues. You feel good about the guys in-house. But then when a player like [Cooks] is potentially available, and you look at the production he’s had playing in two different systems, and hearing the things you hear about the way he goes about his business, it was something we really felt good about if we were able to get it done.

    Snead: It was really the only call I made because we needed a vertical threat. There’s a lot of good receivers out there. But in Sean’s orchestra we needed a certain instrument, and he fit. … With it being on his last year [in his contract] it might be viable.

    Pastoors: You knew that number [$8.5 million] and how it would fit.

    Snead: From [the Patriots’] standpoint, I don’t think it was something they were going to do right away. It probably kept us knocking on the door a little bit.

    Demoff: After [receivers] Mike Evans [$82.5 million], Sammy Watkins [$48 million] and Allen Robinson [$42 million] signed [extensions or contracts with other teams], I think the Patriots’ calculus changed from “absolutely not” to “maybe” — based on some of those deals that came down and projecting what the price tag would be for Brandon if they were going to re-sign him.

    Snead: When Sean went to Georgia for a clinic [that Patriots coach Bill Belichick also would be attending] it had tipped to where, “OK, maybe something could get done.” It had tipped to the stage of, “OK, this is a possibility.”

    McVay: [At the clinic] it was really more of an exchange with coach Belichick of, “How you doing?” It was very quick because he was going somewhere after he finished speaking.

    Snead: I had told Sean, “Y’all don’t just go talk football at the clinic. Make sure you get this thing pushed over the edge.”

    McVay: We [McVay and Belichick] got a chance to connect and really talk on the phone and then we were able to kind of just go back and forth. It was pretty fun because you have so much respect and admiration for him as a coach.

    Brandin Cooks: It’s one of those things until it gets serious, real serious, like a huge possibility, typically you don’t know about it because it might fall through.

    Snead: The parameters of the deal were stuck between [Patriots director of player personnel] Nick [Caserio] and I. The closing of it, because Sean and Bill had struck up a relationship, I thought it was fitting they go close that deal. Let Sean get a little taste.

    Demoff: The only fear you had, with Sean being the negotiator over a player he coveted, was that the Patriots were going to walk away with your next four first-round picks [laughing]. … That was our fear. We didn’t tell Sean that he could sign the trade papers. He could negotiate the deal but he couldn’t sign the trade papers.

    McVay: I wouldn’t say it was nerve-wracking. It was exciting.

    Snead: He really just walked down the hall [to make the final call]. I told him, “OK, you’re going to talk to coach Belichick. We’d like to get it done for this but we know it’s going to take this.” The only thing we laughed about was the sixth-rounder we threw in there. There’s no way we’re telling coach Belichick we’re not [getting this done] because of a sixth-round pick, so just go ahead and give it to him.

    McVay: It’s one of those moments where I think you feel so fortunate and blessed to be in this role. I am a fan of coaching, so when you get a chance to interact with coach Belichick, it was a pretty cool experience.

    Cooks: It’s not like I found out on Twitter or something, which, you know, is huge. It seems so small but a lot of guys find out different ways. But such respect for coach Belichick for calling me. He didn’t have to do that, so I would say it was a couple hours, a little more than that, before it actually broke.

    Snead: As soon as you get Cooks done, there is an element of relief. … Getting the veteran we initially sought, it takes a little bit of pressure off of the draft.

    Pastoors: To complicate things, we were simultaneously working on finalizing Ndamukong Suh. So we had a lot of cap space and we suddenly have no cap space. You never want to say you can’t make it work because you can always make it work. It’s just, “OK, what are we willing to do? How do we actually do it?” For us that was parting ways with [cornerback] Kayvon [Webster].

    Snead: The NFL’s a business … you don’t want to go through that. You have to do it sometimes and that’s what we had to do.
    Sean McVay
    Rams coach Sean McVay during an exhibition against the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium. Patrick Smith / Getty Images

    McVay: These are always tough decisions but ones that sometimes you have to be able to make.

    Pastoors: That cleared some space. And then, the other thing to give us a little bit of breathing room … was going to the guy with the longest contract in the building, [punter] Johnny Hekker. He’s a captain for a reason. Just a call to his agent, “Hey I think we might be in a position where we might need to create some cap space. Would Johnny be willing to work with us and convert salary to signing bonus?” He said, “I’ll call Johnny, but I think we both know the answer to this if that helps you guys.”

    Punter Johnny Hekker: I was at home and I got a call from my agent at about 8 o’clock at night. It sent me into a little bit of panic, but as soon as I picked up he reassured me it was for a good reason. He kind of told me what the intentions of the team were with the money freed up. It was really kind of a no-brainer.

    Pastoors: It created enough space to get us to where we need to be to make all the corresponding moves and get everybody in and under the cap.

    Snead: When [the offseason] was all said and done, we were like, “OK, we accomplished what we set out to do.” The sketch was, “Here’s what we need to do at certain positions,” but at no point were all of those names [on the list]. Because Brandin Cooks was a New England Patriot, Marcus Peters was a Kansas City Chief, Aqib Talib was a Denver Bronco, Ndamukong Suh was a Miami Dolphin. When you look back, I don’t think we could have ever predicted we’d end up with these players.

    Demoff: With Sean and Les and Tony and, certainly [owner] Stan [Kroenke’s] mind-set, we’re never done. … You’re always looking at the big picture. As long as we keep doing that, you’re going to throw yourself into lots of different situations. I don’t think this team is ever done.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: over.the.cap has 2019 numbers now w/ both AD & Hav #90529
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Viewing: 2020 Cap = ~$200M
    ,
    Aaron Donald DE $25,000,000 12.50%
    Todd Gurley RB $17,250,000 8.63%
    Brandin Cooks WR $16,800,000 8.40%
    Mark Barron ILB $9,000,000 4.50%
    Rob Havenstein RT $7,800,000 3.90%
    Robert Woods WR $7,177,504 3.59%

    Jared Goff QB $26,000,000 13.00%
    Marcus Peters CB $15,000,000 7.50%
    .
    .
    ——————————————————————
    57.49% x $200M = ~$115M
    .
    2020, the year we move into the new stadium. I am guessing Barron is probably gone.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: over.the.cap has 2019 numbers now w/ both AD & Hav #90528
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    How can Peters be on that list when he is still on his rookie deal?

    Speculation on what things will look like in 2021, after Peters is signed. zn is guessing he will get $17M/yr on a new deal.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: over.the.cap has 2019 numbers now w/ both AD & Hav #90523
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    That stuff is the maximum. If you made the top of your roster as full of high priced players as you could. And you had the most cheap young players possible.
    .
    10 players at 60% is a good practical number.

    Just guesstimating about 2021. If by then Goff were 30 M, Donald 28 M (all rounded numbers to make math simpler), Cooks 17 M, Gurley 13 M, and Peters 17 M… that’s 105 M…. with a cap of 220 M that gives you 132 M for 60%… the remaining 27 M allows for 2-3 more players? Which is less than I originally said. Before I said 8-9 total for 60%, now it’s 7-8.

    They can always move some money around and Goff and Peters, their contracts aren’t written yet.
    .
    If a cheap QB is the key to a superior roster, maybe they should draft another one. 😉
    2021, all bets might be off. We will have a new CBA and probably a new salary cap.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: over.the.cap has 2019 numbers now w/ both AD & Hav #90518
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I’ve been using the argument which I got from an analysis I read that winning teams tend to have their top contract guys taking up 60% of the cap.

    I used spotrac and looked at the 2019 cap. Right now before signing or extending anyone else, their top 10 contract guys are Donald, Whitworth, Cooks, Brockers, Gurley, Peters, Barron, Goff, Havenstein, and Talib. The lowest of those is 8 M.

    Rounding the numbers just a bit, that comes to 111.5 M.

    The 2019 cap is estimated to be 187 M. 60% of that would be 112.2.

    So as it stands right now, for 2019, the Rams top 10 contracts come to 59.6% of the cap. (They have 37+ M in cap space in 2019.)

    That has to change by 2021, when Goff’s new deal hits the books. By then I assume that not all of the 10 listed above will be there. I assume it will be Goff, Donald, Cooks, Gurley and Peters. That won’t allow 10 so their top 60% will have to be more like 8 or 9. I listed 5. That presumably leaves room for 3 or 4 more.

    I assume both Barron and Whitworth will be gone by then.

    I didn’t list Brockers because he is a FA in 2020 and by then will be going into his 9th year…2021 would be his 10th year. I think they can find another 5-tech 3/4 DE.

    I didn’t list Hav because I think by 2021 they will find a less expensive alternative at ROT. It saves them 7+ M to replace Hav by then.

    I didn’t list Talib because he’s a FA after 2019.

    Looked at that way, by 2021, the major replacements have to be CB, ILB, NT, DE, LOT, ROT. Not all of those will be big contract guys, in fact most will be young. They may already have 2 or 3 of them.

    That is pretty much what I think. I my own salary cap model here about 2 years ago. That was before there was much out there.

    top tier 10-12 [your best players.] 72.0% ~111.8M for 2016 [ Upper Limit ]
    middle tier 12-14 [the rest of the starters.] 14.0% ~21.7M for 2016 [ Lower Limit ]

    bottom tier 36 [includes IR.] 14.0% ~21.7M for 2016 [ Lower Limit ]
    36 players would make an average of $0.6 million/year.

    That stuff is the maximum. If you made the top of your roster as full of high priced players as you could. And you had the most cheap young players possible.
    .
    10 players at 60% is a good practical number.

    link: http://theramshuddle.com/topic/one-kind-of-roster-model/

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant


    Agamemnon

    in reply to: McVay, Kromer … 9/6 … transcripts #90475
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: over.the.cap has 2019 numbers now w/ both AD & Hav #90453
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I like using Sportac. Here is why. Overthecap has us as being about 500k over the cap. The NFL would penalize us if that were true. I am posting the differences in the two sites. It mostly comes from Sportac giving the Rams more credit for rollover from last year. It also seems that Sportac is a bit more up to date, because they have our 10th practice squad member figured in.

    I miss Jim Thomas on this. He also had the best numbers.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Ross Tucker Football: Donald, Mack – Podcast #90448
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I know Suh didn’t get $60M at signing. He got $60 million total from Miami. What are you referring to?
    Yeah, it is Brandt.

    Brandt believes that Donald’s agents based their demands on Suh’s contract, but that Suh’s money was simply a result of being a free agent. I disagree, I don’t think the Donald camp based anything on just one contract. Therefore everything the Donald group was asking was base on a fallacy.

    I think they based their demands on an NBA type contract. I don’t think being a FA or holding out is as effective as some credit, because I think the threat is often as effective or even more effective than the action.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Ross Tucker Football: Donald, Mack – Podcast #90444
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think that’s Brandt he’s talking to. I don’t like Brandt’s take on the Donald talks and the deal, I think he’s wrong about it.

    I know Suh didn’t get $60M at signing. He got $60 million total from Miami. What are you referring to?
    Yeah, it is Brandt.

    • This reply was modified 7 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams Round Out Practice Squad with OL Evan Boehm #90434
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    link: http://arizonasports.com/story/1634361/a-q-shipley-injury-offers-cardinals-c-evan-boehm-a-shot-at-redemption/

    A.Q. Shipley injury offers Cardinals C Evan Boehm a shot at redemption

    By Craig Morgan | August 20, 2018 at 2:35 pm
    UPDATED: August 20, 2018 at 9:05 pm

    TEMPE, Ariz. — Injuries often create opportunities in the NFL, but few players experience as dramatic a shift in potential outcomes as interior lineman Evan Boehm has this preseason. When training camp began, there were more than a few analysts who wondered if the 2016 fourth-round pick would even make the 53-man roster, Boehm included.

    With center A.Q. Shipley injured and lost for the season, Boehm is instead poised to become a critical part of the rotation.

    “The biggest thing Evan brings is just the flexibility of being able to play center and guard,” coach Steve Wilks said Monday after practice. “When you start trying to shape your 53[-man roster], those are some of the combinations you look for, guys that can give you position flex. That’s very intriguing.”

    Once considered the possible center of the future, the 2016 fourth-round pick didn’t show much in his first two NFL seasons. He was shifted first to right guard where he struggled, and then to left guard, where he began 2018 camp on the second team alongside rookie center Mason Cole.

    When Shipley suffered a season-ending torn ACL in the Red & White Practice and Daniel Munyer struggled at center in the team’s first preseason game against the Los Angeles Chargers, Boehm was called upon to reprise his college position, the one at which he feels most comfortable and the one he still hopes to play.

    Unlike Munyer’s snaps, Boehm’s against the New Orleans Saints on Friday were crisp and on point. The protection of the entire second unit improved dramatically over the first game, and coach Steve Wilks came away impressed.

    “He improved as well as the whole offensive line,” Wilks said as he looked forward to Sunday’s game in Dallas against the Cowboys. “It’s going to be a good test again this week, going against a pretty good defensive front so we’ll see how exactly we perform but I was pleased with his performance.”

    Boehm said the performance against the Saints was the culmination of the progress he feels he has made throughout camp.

    “I always knew I could play here,” he said. “I know I have another level where I can play but it’s the confidence within yourself that you have to find and go out and play with and that lacked a little bit.

    “I was thinking too much. I wasn’t playing the way I normally play. Now I’m playing with confidence. I’m not thinking. I’m taking knowing steps instead of thinking steps.”

    It’s rare to have a rookie serve in a mentor role, but Boehm admits playing alongside Cole for the first half of camp helped. Cole said it was a two-way street.

    “We both played center so if I came up and didn’t know something, he was there to help me and if I didn’t know something he was there to help me,” Cole said. “It was a really good connection there. I didn’t really expect [to mentor Boehm] but playing center, you fall into that position no matter who you are because you’ve got to know so much about the offense.”

    Boehm said it also helped to play guard because it gave him a different perspective.

    “At guard, you can see the line a lot more; you can see the picture a lot more,” he said. “The more confident I got, the better I started playing throughout camp and the worry went away quick after getting those reps.”

    Boehm knows there is work to do with two preseason games remaining before final cuts. He isn’t taking a roster spot for granted, but he said he felt “comfortable” against the Saints and he insists he is in a much better mental state than he was a year ago, thanks to coaching, Cole, “family, praying and just sayin’, ‘screw it. Let’s go play. Let’s go have fun.’

    “It’s a job, but at the same time it’s a fun job,” Boehm said. “I just want to be on the team. Put me somewhere. Let me play. I’ve got a shot and I have to make the most of it. I’ve got to keep on proving the coaches right and show them what I am capable of doing.”

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Tweets – 9/5 #90433
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    King says the Raiders had enough cash to make the deal.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: tweets n stuff + VB chat … 9/4 #90418
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

Viewing 30 posts - 2,311 through 2,340 (of 7,618 total)