Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,201 through 1,230 (of 7,618 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    The Leonard Floyd contract has never been official. It makes me wonder if there is buyers remorse or is there some technical issues with the contract for why it has not been made official by the team.

    Neither Floyd or Brockers has signed their contracts, so neither counts against the cap at this time.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: tweets … 3/30 thru 4/2 #113229
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think his arm has gotten stronger since he was drafted. I watched every throw in college and I don’t think any were 50 yards in the air.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: now that Brock is back — roster choices? #113123
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I am guessing that somehow they squeeze everything in.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: is this a rebuild year? or is it a touch-up? #113122
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think there are too many changes to think this is a touch up year, too many starters gone, too many coaches gone. imo

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Christian’s deal falls through with Jets #113079
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Maybe we get him back, if we want.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113054
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113036
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    NFL

    Find this article at:
    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001107737/article/rams-resign-dt-brockers-after-ravens-deal-nixed
    Rams re-sign DT Brockers after Ravens deal nixed

    By Kevin Patra
    Around the NFL Writer
    Published: March 27, 2020 at 08:07 a.m.
    Updated: March 27, 2020 at 10:21 a.m.

    Well, that was fast.

    Moments after the Baltimore Ravens announced Friday they would not sign Michael Brockers after being unable to come to an agreement on terms of a contract, the defensive lineman is headed back to L.A.

    NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported that Brockers will be re-signing with the Rams, per the player’s agent, Scott Casterline. The defensive tackle confirmed his return on social media.

    A wild twist turns Brockers around after he was headed to Baltimore.

    The 29-year-old defensive lineman was expected to sign a three-year, $30 million deal in Baltimore that included $21 million guaranteed. However, a lingering high-ankle sprain from late in the season was flagged in a medical report, and the two sides couldn’t agree on how the contract should be altered.

    Rapoport noted that the three-year deal in L.A. is worth up to $31.5 million in maximum value, similar to what was on the table in Baltimore.

    The scuttled deal in Baltimore is the latest fallout due to the COVID-19 global pandemic. With team offices shut down and players unable to take visits to receive physicals, situations like Brockers’ were bound to happen.

    The Rams’ familiarity with the medical situation could have made it much easier to bridge whatever gap lingered between the Ravens and Brockers.

    Brockers spent his entire career with the Rams after becoming a first-round pick in 2012, collecting 23 sacks and 344 tackles in eight seasons. After the deal with Baltimore fell through, he’ll continue his career alongside Aaron Donald.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113025
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    https://sports.yahoo.com/michael-brockers-returning-rams-ravens-115922485.html

    Michael Brockers returning to Rams after Ravens deal falls through
    [ProFootball Talk on NBC Sports]
    Josh Alper
    ProFootball Talk on NBC SportsMar 27, 2020, 6:59 AM

    It didn’t work out for defensive tackle Michael Brockers in Baltimore, but his return to the open market didn’t last long.

    Brockers’ agent Scott Casterline told Ian Rapoport of NFL Media that his client is returning to the Rams. It’s a three-year deal with a maximum value of $31.5 million.

    Brockers agreed to a three-year, $30 million deal with the Ravens last week, but reports surfaced this week that the deal was in jeopardy because the Ravens had concerns about the condition of his ankle. Friday morning brought word the deal was off and the Ravens confirmed it a short time later.

    Brockers has spent his entire eight-year career with the Rams and has been a fixture in the starting lineup since he joined the team. That figures to remain the case after his brief departure went up in a puff of smoke.

    Michael Brockers returning to Rams after Ravens deal falls through originally appeared on Pro Football Talk

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Ian Rapoport: Brockers back to Rams. #113024
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I like Brockers. The Rams got better again.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Whitworth’s contract, Robinson and Floyd contract info #112976
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Whitworth’s contract, Robinson and Floyd contract info #112975
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Logos/colors Monday … and … here it is #112856
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    It isn’t terrible, but I would not pay money for someone to design that.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Coronavirus and Us #112760
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I am probably in the high risk group. 70 and COPD and diabetes. I live fairly close to St. Louis, but no know infections in Franklin County. The stores have some shortage on stuff like eggs, dairy, flour, not as much produce as usual. I haven’t seen a big effect so far.
    .
    I sort of expect this to run its course. It could change and mutate. I expect them to come up with a vaccine. I hope this is over with in a couple months. Good Luck, everybody.

    I got a pair of kittens. They are a blast, a lot of fun.

    • This reply was modified 5 years, 2 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: VB on Rams & Gurley #112723
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I am a bit sad to see Gurley go. He was a really good back when he first started. He can still be good, just not as good as he used to be.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams release Gurley #112650
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/free-agency-update-rb-todd-gurley-released-by-rams/id1477535034?i=1000468912576

    Free Agency Update: RB Todd Gurley Released By Rams 11 Personnel: A show about the Los Angeles Rams

    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/free-agency-update-rb-todd-gurley-released-by-rams/id1477535034?i=1000468912576

    Rich Hammond of The Athletic LA gives breaking reaction to the news that Pro Bowl RB Todd Gurley has been released by the Rams. What does this mean for the draft, and why couldn’t they trade him? Rich breaks it all down. Stay tuned to The Athletic for more free agency breaking news.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Fowler to Atlanta #112576
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Ian Rapoport@RapSheet
    The #Rams tried to keep [Fowler], but he opts for Atlanta.

    I am glad he got away at that price.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams to sign Leonard Floyd? #112554
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    He looks just as good to me as Fowler did.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Whitworth signs #112550
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    That is good news.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Littleton to Raiders #112489
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    For 12 million, I would have tried to keep Littleton. I would rather have Littleton than Fowler.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Brockers signs w/ Ravens #112426
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I always like Brockers.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    link https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2020/03/16/ravens-agree-to-terms-with-michael-brockers-on-three-year-deal/

    Ravens agree to terms with Michael Brockers on three-year deal
    Posted by Charean Williams on March 16, 2020, 7:31 PM EDT
    Getty Images

    The Ravens have agreed to terms with Michael Brockers, Ian Rapoport of NFL Media reports.

    The deal is for three years and $30 million.

    The additions of Brockers and Calais Campbell should make the Ravens defense even more formidable in 2020.

    Brockers, 29, spent the first eight seasons of his career with the Rams after they made him the 14th overall choice in 2012.

    He has appeared in 123 games with 121 starts, making 344 tackles, 23 sacks, 52 quarterback hits, two forced fumbles and nine pass breakups.

    In 2019, he made 63 tackles and three sacks in starting all 16 games.

    The Rams have been bracing for significant departures, and pass-rusher Dante Fowler and linebacker Cory Littleton are among others from the defense who could leave.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: new CBA voted in … what it means #112355
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    NFL

    Find this article at:
    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001106247/article/nfl-players-approve-cba-impact-on-league-in-2020-and-beyond
    NFL players approve CBA: Impact on league in 2020 and beyond

    By Judy Battista
    NFL.com reporter
    Published: March 15, 2020 at 10:17 a.m.
    Updated: March 15, 2020 at 11:24 a.m.

    After 10 months of negotiations, some very public player splintering, a little last-minute tinkering and even the election of a new union president, the NFL has a new collective bargaining agreement that will govern its relationship with players for the next 11 years. The agreement is a sweeping, 400-plus page document. Let’s explore what its passage means by examining five crucial questions in the immediate aftermath:

    1) First, after so much controversy, why did this pass?

    The vote was not public, but it’s a safe bet that it passed because the deal was geared to helping “middle class” players who make up the majority of NFL rosters. Sam Acho, a 10-year NFL veteran and player rep who supported the deal, posted a video last week in which he explained why the rank-and-file players were likely to be in favor of the deal despite very public resistance from some of the biggest stars in the game. “Sixty-five percent of players in the NFL last year made minimum salaries,” Acho said. “So when you talk about a 20 percent increase effectively year over year, in exchange for one extra game, that’s a really good deal.”

    It also didn’t hurt that the players are scattered during the offseason, and the voting was done by secret ballot, perhaps diminishing the influence of the most vocal opponents. The final tally was quite close: 1,019 players voted in favor of the new CBA, 959 were opposed. Another potential factor that might’ve helped in pushing this proposal across the finish line: the worldwide economic uncertainly spawning from COVID-19.

    2) So, 17 games?

    Well, not quite yet. The 2020 season will look familiar — four preseason games, 16 regular-season games — with one very new feature: The league will add a wild-card team to each conference, meaning there will be two extra games on Wild Card Weekend. And only the top seed in each conference will get a first-round bye. The second seed will play the No. 7 seed in the first round and so on.

    The league has a window to add the 17th regular-season game beginning in 2021 and ending in 2023 — and 2022 seems to be the most logical time, because all of the new broadcast contracts will be in place by then.

    3) With an uneven number of games, how will they manage the 17th game?

    That still has to be figured out. The likeliest solution right now seems to be having one conference receive the 17th game as a home game one season, and the other conference getting the additional home game the next season. Other ideas have been tossed around — playing the 17th game internationally or at a neutral site — but nothing has been decided.

    4) How will the league change during the life of this deal?

    The 17th game necessitated changes that will affect player development and could show up on the field immediately. Once the 17-game regular season starts, teams will be limited to 16 padded practices during training camp and no more than three in a row. That is a big change from the current padded-practice limit of 28, so expect coaches to have some thoughts on how that will impact preparation. There will also be a five-day acclimation period that will limit the kind of work done at the very start of camp.

    No practice can last longer than 2 1/2 hours and players can’t be at the team facility for more than 12 hours per day. And there must be a “bye week” after the third and final preseason game before the start of the regular season.

    And this is a big one: Teams are not allowed to add padded practices in the regular season once the 17-game seasons start. Under this new CBA, during the regular season, padded practices will be limited to 14, 11 of which must be held during the first 11 weeks. All of that will remain in place even when the 17-game seasons start.

    Teams are also getting bigger. The active roster on game day will go from 46 to 48 players, and one of the extra players has to be an offensive lineman. Practice squads will also expand, to 12 players in 2020 and 2021, and to 14 starting in 2022. Two practice-squad players each week can be elevated to the team’s active roster, meaning that the roster during the week will effectively be 55. That, the league hopes, will help spread out the wear and tear players incur from the 17th game.

    5) What’s next for the players’ union?

    The last few weeks have exposed significant fissures in the NFLPA. At the very least, it is clear that some vocal players do not have confidence in the executive director, DeMaurice Smith.

    The players elected JC Tretter as their new president, though, and that might be a positive sign for Smith because Tretter is considered a moderate and ran on a platform of the need for unity in the ranks. Most significantly, he beat out defensive back Michael Thomas, who opposed the new CBA and had the backing of hardliner Russell Okung. The passage of the CBA indicates that the majority of players may still support Smith. Okung’s complaint to the National Labor Relations Board remains alive, though, and how that plays out could certainly impact Smith’s future.

    Follow Judy Battista on Twitter @JudyBattista.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    How Serious is the Coronavirus? Infectious Disease Expert Michael Osterholm Explains | Joe Rogan

    Michael Osterholm is an internationally recognized expert in infectious disease epidemiology. He is Regents Professor, McKnight Presidential Endowed Chair in Public Health, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy (CIDRAP), Distinguished Teaching Professor in the Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, a professor in the Technological Leadership Institute, College of Science and Engineering, and an adjunct professor in the Medical School, all at the University of Minnesota. Look for his book “Deadliest Enemy: Our War Against Deadly Germs” for more info. https://amzn.to/2IAzeLe

    The first video is a beginning of the whole interview. This seemed as good as anything, so watch it and decide it you agree,

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: tweets … 3/6 thru 3/12 #112199
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams new logo confirmed #112177
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I would think they could do something better than that.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Stadium Update #112147
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant



    Agamemnon

    in reply to: McVay, Staley, O’Connell, Bonemego … 2/12 … transcript #111279
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: tweets & the like … 2/10 thru 2/13 #111147
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I can believe that about Weddle, because he was disappointing in his playmaking.

    Agamemnon

Viewing 30 posts - 1,201 through 1,230 (of 7,618 total)