Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 5,341 through 5,370 (of 7,618 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gamebook.pdf vs SF – games 1-16 #34535
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Balt added

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams Inactives – Donnal at tackle #34525
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Yikes, Mason is dropping down the depth chart? Don’t fumble, Trey.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams Inactives – Donnal at tackle #34522
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    The new pickups on the Oline are active, Kush and Folkerts.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Tweets 11/21 – Kaepernick to IR #34516
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Nov 03, 2015 12:23 PM EST
    Colin Kaepernick Contract: San Francisco 49ers Can Save $100 Million If They Release Quarterback

    Things just keep getting worse for the San Francisco 49ers.

    Now 2-6, the 49ers have chosen to bench their “franchise quarterback” Colin Kaepernick in exchange for former first-round draft pick Blaine Gabbert. The 49ers have lost six of their last seven games, and any hopes of making the playoffs have disappeared. With the recent trade of veteran tight end Vernon Davis to the Denver Broncos, it’s pretty obvious the 49ers are rebuilding.

    Now all eyes are on owner Jed York and general manager Trent Baalke. They have a massive decision to make regarding Kaepernick’s contract.

    Last year Kaepernick signed a contract with the 49ers worth up to $126 million and more than $60 million in guaranteed money. But, it’s not that simple. You’ve got to read the fine print. Unfortunately for Kaepernick (and his agent), it looks like he will make less than $30 million. So how is this? How can Kaepenick’s “record contract” become so little than what we all originally thought?

    Kaepernick’s contract is very team friendly and incentive based with three huge factors. If Kaepernick doesn’t lead the 49ers to the Super Bowl or make first or second team All Pro, his salary drops $2 million each year. The third aspect in the contract also includes that Kaepernick must take at least 80 percent of the snaps en route to a 49ers Super Bowl appearance. With the way Kaepernick and the 49ers are playing, it doesn’t like he’s getting the full max deal.

    So what do all these numbers mean?

    It means that Kaepernick’s potential $126 million contract could decrease by $100 million because they can cut him before April 1 and save a massive amount of money. If the 49ers cut Kaepernick by April 1, they will save more than $9 million in salary cap space next season, and they wouldn’t have to pay the remainder of his contract. To make things even worse for Kaepernick, if the 49ers cut him before April 1, that means they wouldn’t even have to pay his injury clause in the contract. It’s a tough situation for Kaepernick, but it’s the reality of the NFL business.

    If the 49ers choose to cut Kaepernick this offseason that means he would have made roughly $10 million last season, $9 million this season (including $2 million reduction), and a $7 million signing bonus. In conclusion, that means Kaepernick would only get $26 million of that $126 million contract.

    Kaepernick has six touchdown and five interceptions this season with a 59.3 completion percentage. Now benched for a first round draft bust, it’s safe to say he won’t be selected to the All Pro team. Kaepernick has looked completely lost without Jim Harbaugh, and he’s not running nearly as effective as he used to.

    The NFL trade deadline is Tuesday, Nov. 3 at 4 p.m. EDT. Some NFL experts have noted that the Philadelphia Eagles would make a good fit because of the Chip Kelly offense, but it’s unlikely Kaepernick will get dealt.

    Follow Damon Salvadore on Twitter @DamonSalvadore1

    http://www.latinpost.com/articles/91879/20151103/colin-kaepernick-contract-san-francisco-49ers-can-save-101-million-if-they-release-kaepernick.htm

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: 2016 draft: mocks, draft order, general comments #34511
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    A draft for offense.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Three & Out: An Early Look at 2016 QBs #34508
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: QB Change #34506
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I do know that both Steve Beuerlein and Jim Miller, would like to be the QB for the Rams.

    .

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Quinn out #34501
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: 2016 draft: mocks, draft order, general comments #34495
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Early Draft Landscape

    No matter what the Rams do, they should end up with 3 really good players with their first 3 picks. It is likely that they get another good player in the 3rd and a decent WR in the 4th. If you want a possible #1 WR, you need to take him in the first, but there isn’t a Cooper or Watkins in this draft. imo

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.
    • This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photozn.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: 2016 draft: mocks, draft order, general comments #34484
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    lol

    Believe it or not they would win a lot of games that way.

    Is the value in this draft in the 2nd round? Or to put that another way, is there a lot of value in the 2nd round?

    Cause if so, if it were me, I would trade down.

    .

    I think that you might have about 50 really good players, red chip or close to red chip. Which means you can get good players at a lot of different positions or high second round draft choices this year can be more valuable than most other years.

    As far as trading down, that depends on how the draft unfolds more than its landscape. imo
    Cause, somebody has to be willing to trade up.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: 2016 draft: mocks, draft order, general comments #34480
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    A DE draft, just for zn. 😉

    Buckner and Oakman are big enough to play tackle. Nassib is like a strong Chris Long.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think it is a good thing we drafted all those offensive linemen. I even wouldn’t mind Battle starting at LT. I think his pass pro is better than Robinson’s at this point. I think Donnal is their second best RT. Reynolds is best at LG and he can baby sit GR. If Stanley drops in the draft, I would be tempted to draft him. He would have been the best OT in last year’s draft.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: JT – Podcast 11/20 – added Cosell and Miller #34477
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Segment 2 – Greg Cosell 11/20/15
    Friday, November 20, 2015 12:14 PM

    Rams start @5:00. Foles was missing too many routine throws. Foles has been a disappointment. Robinson has not played well. He never even did a basic ‘kick slide’ at Auburn.

    Segment 2 – Jim Miller 11/20/15
    Friday, November 20, 2015 3:26 PM

    Rams start @3:00. Foles is not confident in his reads. This offense is new to him.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Three & Out: An Early Look at 2016 QBs #34459
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    jrry32 is a good poster. If the Rams decided to draft a QB, I am fine with that. I would not trade up to do it. I might consider trading into the bottom of the first round, cause I would get a guy for 5 years, but I most likely would wait.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: 101, 11/19 … Adam Caplan #34454
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    he has to call protections and scheme against the blitz pre-snap, he has to get used to sight adjustments with the WRs, and he has to drop back a lot from center. My understanding is that most if not all of that is new.

    That is what I think is the main reason. The other things just makes it worse. I think Mannion is ahead of him on this and most other things, but I don’t think it helps if we put Mannion out there, but it might not hurt. I am ready to call out some players if they don’t perform.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    If that is true, I am not going to let one guy hold this whole team hostage. Greg can sit until he does it right.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams Bench Nick Foles and Look at his Contract #34364
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Three & Out: An Early Look at 2016 QBs #34361
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I would hope for Cook in the first round, Wentz in the second, or Hogan in the sixth. Otherwise I am willing to go with the QBs we have and better WRs/TEs from the draft and the OLine we have now.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams Bench Nick Foles and Look at his Contract #34360
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    The lead article in this thread seems to nail Foles’ contract. Although, who knows for sure?

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Podcasts 11/17 – Martz and Balzer #34331
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Balzer says, this roster bonus is not guaranteed. Who is right? We can only wait and see. imo

    Yeah I just wrote about this in another thread without seeing this first.

    Maybe interesting, maybe Balzer’s wrong.

    Typically, roster bonuses are not guaranteed. So, if people are saying it is, then there is probably a reason that they are saying that. I don’t think it is just something that people got wrong or is coming from an agent. Although there is some indication that it might not be guaranteed.

    http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/st.-louis-rams/nick-foles/

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams Bench Nick Foles and Look at his Contract #34330
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    What Balzer said, I count as an opinion. I will need something that will make it a fact before I go with Balzer.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Who's 'winning' the Foles-Bradford trade? #34328
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I count everything a wash, except we have Philly’s 2cd round pick next year. We can use that pick to get a QB with potential. 😉

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Three & Out: An Early Look at 2016 QBs #34317
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    well. at least some of the top qbs will be coming into play? or will they be gone by the tenth pick?

    Chance that one of the top 3 is there past ten and we take him? 10%

    Chance that we take a QB in the 2cd round? 40%

    Chance that we take a QB anywhere in the draft? 60%

    I couldn’t get Miss Cleo on the phone, but I did get her cat.

    WR MICHAEL THOMAS OHIO STATE

    QB CARDALE JONES OHIO STATE

    DE CARL NASSIB PENN STATE

    TE NICK VANNETT OHIO STATE

    WR BRAXTON MILLER OHIO STATE

    QB KEVIN HOGAN STANFORD

    My all Ohio St. draft.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Podcasts 11/17 – Martz and Balzer #34310
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    http://sports.live.stltoday.com/Event/Rams_chat_with_Jim_Thomas_401c0882cd99

    Foles has a $6 million roster bonus due next March that already is guaranteed. in addition, $2 million worth of unamortized signing bonus would count against the cap if he’s cut. So it sure doesn’t look like that’s going to happen.
    by jthomas 2:03 PM

    Balzer says, this roster bonus is not guaranteed. Who is right? We can only wait and see. imo

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Barrett Jones is on Chicago’s PS. Does Fisher still like him?

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: QB Change #34303
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    It looks to me like 2014 is the exception or outlier , Chip Kelly’s offense before the rest of the NFL caught. Foles never was that guy. imo

    I think you’re thinking of 2013.

    2014 is more the guy I would expect if he rights himself.

    I agree that 2013 is the outlier.

    Your right, I meant 2013. I agree with that.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: QB Change #34298
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Many people who were against the trade said there were flaws with Foles’ game, but there was nothing that could have predicted this complete futility.

    Foles as a rookie for Reid. Why is he worse now?

    It would be interesting to find out how much shotgun he played in for Reid. I believe he was all shotgun in college and certainly was all shotgun with Kelly.

    So I think it’s telling that Fisher in effect says he still has to learn the offense.

    I don’t think he means the playbook. I think he means executing the offense in real time with real bullets while dropping back from center.

    A lot of that was new to him. To me he looked unconfident and overwhelmed. If he gets back to his Philly 2014 level he will be of course better than he was in his last 5 games. But that again may be rhythm, feeling comfortable, executing etc. while dropping back from center. ‘

    .

    It looks to me like 2014 is the exception or outlier , Chip Kelly’s offense before the rest of the NFL caught. Foles never was that guy. imo

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: 2016 draft: mocks, draft order, general comments #34286
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    ——————-
    LMU93 — if season ended today

    Rams would have the 14th, 43rd and 44th overall picks in the top two rounds.
    ————————–

    If we don’t win a couple a games, we will probably be picking ~10.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: QB Change #34285
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I dunno, but the vast majority of those hi-lites
    involved a nice clean pocket or at most
    one pass-rusher attacking from one edge,
    and Nick could easily glide away from the rusher.

    w
    v


    Those were just highligths. He was sacked 20 times in 7 games. That is about twice what he got this year.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: QB Change #34282
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Foles as a rookie for Reid. Why is he worse now?

    Agamemnon

Viewing 30 posts - 5,341 through 5,370 (of 7,618 total)