reporters on Rams in free agency, week 2 (3/16-?)

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle reporters on Rams in free agency, week 2 (3/16-?)

  • This topic has 2 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 10 years ago by Avatar photozn.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #40614
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Previously burned Rams too tentative in free agency

    RYAN KARTJE

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/free-708249-rams-agency.html

    Rams general manager Les Snead concedes that he has made some bad free agent signings and is being cautious.

    A week before NFL free agency opened, Rams COO Kevin Demoff stood in front of an audience at his high school alma mater, Harvard-Westlake, for a presentation on the team’s impending move to Los Angeles. After an hour, he opened the floor to questions, and naturally, the discussion pivoted to the Rams’ plans for free agency.

    On March 9, the first official day free agents could sign, the team was flush with cap space. Nearly $45 million was available, enough to make a splash with a big signing or two. But that wasn’t in the Rams’ plans, Demoff said.

    Almost all of that space was “earmarked for our own guys,” he explained. There were future contract extensions with Aaron Donald, Michael Brockers and Tavon Austin to think about. And then, there was the blunt truth.

    “I will say, we’ve been really crappy in free agency,” Demoff said. “I’ve written a lot of bad deals. We just haven’t found a lot of success in free agency. And so, I think there’s a buyer beware in all of that, in terms of going out and buying other people’s players, that we just haven’t figured out.”

    This is hardly an irrational line of thinking. Remember, this is a market that got backup wide receiver Mohamed Sanu paid $7 million per year and one-hit wonder pass rusher Olivier Vernon nearly equal compensation to J.J. Watt. Most active teams overspend in free agency. Many live to regret it.

    Demoff knows this. Before the 2013 season, the Rams fell in love with Jared Cook, inexplicably deciding to make him one of the highest-paid tight ends in the league. He’s no longer on the roster. A year later, they signed wideout Kenny Britt, who has been similarly disappointing.

    But there’s no reason to tiptoe around free agency. Past failures shouldn’t hamstring a cap-flushed team from making reasonable deals or going for broke on a player who can singlehandedly change your team’s outlook. Not all free agent contracts are bad. Just ask the Super Bowl champion Broncos.

    We’re nearly a week into the Rams’ first free agency on the West Coast, and so far, as promised, there have been no blockbuster deals. Safety Rodney McLeod left for Philadelphia, which hurt. But important starters were re-signed – linebacker Mark Barron, defensive ends William Hayes and Eugene Sims, cornerback Trumaine Johnson and center Tim Barnes – and a smart decision was made to let cornerback Janoris Jenkins walk.

    There wasn’t, however, any movement at quarterback, where the Rams are most desperate. The market for signal callers has been unsurprisingly steep, the kind of salary blitz that gets Brock Osweiler paid an average of $18 million per year in Houston. Caution is understandable. But completely removing yourself from the market, like the Rams seem to have done, doesn’t help any more than overpaying Osweiler would have. At least now the Texans look like a legitimate playoff team.

    As of now, Jets quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick remains perplexingly unsigned, and while it appears that he’s asking for too much – probably close to what Osweiler made – the market should soon adjust for him. When that happens, a savvy team could slide in and secure a 33-year-old proven starter with a reasonable two- or three-year contract worth around $15 million per year.

    That team almost certainly won’t be the Rams, though. Demoff has called current starter Case Keenum his “favorite free agent quarterback.” After rejecting advances from Robert Griffin III and denying interest in other quarterbacks, the organization clearly remains committed to Keenum. For a quarterback who has completed more than 60 percent of his passes in just one season (2015), it’s fair to wonder why.

    It’s a risk-averse move, sure. Overpaying a failing quarterback can cripple an organization’s plans. But refusing to make big moves when they present themselves is equally damaging – especially when you haven’t had a winning season in 13 years.

    With Keenum, the Rams may surpass their pathetic 11-touchdown total in the passing game next season. To expect much beyond that, though, is probably unreasonable. And with no real options coming up in free agency next season, another thin draft class at quarterback in 2017, and a roster that will perpetually keep them out of the league’s top 10 picks, the Rams are on the verge of putting themselves in an even tighter spot, either forced to draft a quarterback this year or roll with Keenum for the foreseeable future. Neither of those options is ideal.

    Even after re-signing Donald and Austin and whomever else next offseason, there would almost certainly still be enough space for the Rams to fit an upgrade at quarterback, where they’re simply not dynamic enough at the moment to be a playoff contender. So why stay with Keenum, other than out of fear of overpaying elsewhere? And why leave him without any added weapons?

    In spite of its conservative approach, the Rams offense is still frighteningly low on talent. While they’ll probably address their wideout shortage in Rounds 1 or 2, affordable free agent targets like new Pittsburgh tight end Ladarius Green, who signed for $5 million per year, could have been had this offseason.

    Instead, the Rams have chosen to take a backseat, while other rising teams, such as the Raiders, address several needs with (mostly) reasonable contracts.

    As he wrapped up his answer about the team’s free agents plans, Demoff suggested that the team would pursue players who approached them with interest in playing in Los Angeles. Beyond that, “I wouldn’t expect a ton from us.”

    To his point, we haven’t seen much. Often, that’s not a bad thing in free agency.

    But for a team with no viable quarterback, limited options in the passing game, a middling offensive line and tens of millions in available cap space, it’s fair to wonder whether the Rams’ conservative approach to free agency is safe or just shortsighted.

    #40615
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think this article is as superficial as the one Snow critiques in another thread (here: http://theramshuddle.com/topic/wrs-in-the-draft-thread-combine-after/#post-40613 ).

    It might be a while before the southern cal writers know enough about the team to write anything with informed nuance in it.

    The Rams have a mixed record in free agency. Long, Wells, and Finnegan were injuries. Cook IMO was a dud and I never warmed up to him. Britt is serviceable, and not expensive. Fairley and Ayers were good signings, as were Hayes and Reynolds. Basically they do better in mid-range free agency, but then as I said 3 of the big signings were just injury casualties. I know they have the recent Demoff remarks as fodder, but then real knowledge of the team would allow someone to put those remarks in context and work around those statements instead of acting like they are the alpha and omega “big reveal” on the issue.

    #40659
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams play it safe in free agency by re-signing their own

    Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/27646/rams-playing-it-safe-in-free-agency-by-re-signing-their-own

    Though it was expensive to keep Trumaine Johnson, he gives the Rams some security at cornerback.
    A breakdown of the first week of free agency for the Los Angeles Rams.

    Most significant signing: CB Trumaine Johnson — The Rams simply couldn’t afford to lose both of their starting cornerbacks in free agency, especially after spending the past four years developing them. They opted for Johnson in part because he’s a bit younger and brings more size. It took the franchise tag and a nearly $14 million price tag to make it happen, but the Rams would have faced a major dilemma and plenty of competition had both starters hit the open market.

    Most significant loss: CB Janoris Jenkins — Yes, keeping Johnson softens the blow of losing Jenkins to the New York Giants, but that doesn’t mean losing Jenkins doesn’t hurt. The Rams wanted to keep both cornerbacks, but Jenkins’ price soared to a place the Rams weren’t willing to go. Although he has had his warts, Jenkins has been one of the defense’s top playmakers for the past four years and is coming off his best season in 2015. The Rams have some depth, and if E.J. Gaines returns to full strength, they should be able to get by — but think of how well-stocked they would have been at cornerback had they been able to keep Jenkins.

    Player they should have signed: S Rodney McLeod — Though the Rams were equipped to deal with the loss of one of their cornerbacks, the same can’t be said of free safety. They signed McLeod as an undrafted free agent and molded him into a solid NFL starter at a position where those are hard to find. By the time McLeod hit the open market, his price went above what the Rams were comfortable paying. But this is one instance when the Rams should have been willing to extend themselves a bit to keep a solid player who still has upside. Instead, free safety can now be added to the list of team needs heading toward the draft.

    What’s next: The first wave of free agency is over and teams are now bargain-hunting for players who can help, but certainly won’t transform the franchise. The Rams aren’t going to find the substantial offensive help they need, but locating cheaper, short-term options for depth at all levels of the defense and at tight end would be a good place to start. It would also allow them to mostly focus their draft efforts on bolstering an offense in serious need of help.

    Overall grade: C — It’s hard to blame the Rams for staying out of the fray on overpriced free agents who might have been marginal upgrades over what they have in place, at best. Keeping key pieces like Johnson, Mark Barron and William Hayes was important, but losing Jenkins and McLeod balances out those re-signings. After losing that duo, it would have made sense for the Rams to reallocate some of those funds to someone like tight end Ladarius Green, a young player with upside who didn’t break the bank.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.