Recent Forum Topics Forums Search Search Results for 'patient'

Viewing 30 results - 541 through 570 (of 943 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • #57481
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Al Jazeera
    link:http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2016/11/refuse-accept-election-results-161110093108400.html

    The underbelly of the US is exposed for the whole world to see. Let the calamity of Trump do for the US at large what 9/11 failed to do, writes Dabashi [EPA]
    By
    Hamid Dabashi

    @HamidDabashi

    Hamid Dabashi is the Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature at Columbia University.

    William Faulkner, in his Banquet Speech at the City Hall in Stockholm, on December 10, 1950, on receiving the Nobel Prize in literature said: “Our tragedy today is a general and universal physical fear so long sustained by now that we can even bear it. There are no longer problems of the spirit. There is only the question: When will I be blown up?”

    What in the world did he mean? “Blown up” by what? How?

    If you lived through the endless night linking the fears of Tuesday evening of November 8 to the terror of the following Wednesday morning wondering how to explain Donald Trump’s victory to your children, you have a glimpse of what frightened Faulkner so many years ago so far from his homeland. But can we still ask serious, even frightening, questions, as Faulkner did, any more?

    “Does America deserve to survive,” Faulkner asked in 1955 at the news of a vicious murder and mutilation of a young black boy.

    Just before this nightmare descended upon us I read that a European philosopher had said that if he were an American he would have voted for Trump. “It will be a kind of big awakening,” he had said, “new political processes will be set in motion.”

    Perhaps, I thought to myself, but this man for sure does not live in the United States. He does not have a child who goes to public school in New York. He has not struggled to calm the raw nerves of an eight-year-old boy who is scared all his Mexican friends will be rounded up and deported from the US.
    The angry liberals
    What will a Trump presidency mean for the US?

    So where would we stand between the gaudy and juvenile Stalinism of what today passes as “the European left” and the delusional liberalism now publicly stunned by Trump’s victory in the US?

    Liberal America is right now flabbergasted, incredulous, violent, recriminatory. It now openly fears that it might be ruled as Chile was ruled by Augusto Pinochet, Iran by the Shah and the Ayatollahs, Egypt by Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, Russia by Vladimir Putin, Turkey by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Palestine by Benjamin Netanyahu. How dare history to even think to do to liberal America what liberal America has done to the world?

    Recrimination, finger-wagging, and continuing to be deaf and blind to reason and logic have resumed apace among these angry liberals.

    Diehard Clinton supporters are accusing those who as a matter of principle opposed her record of corruption and warmongering of having paved the way for Trump.

    Many Bernie Sanders supporters, myself included, made a strategic choice not to vote for Clinton if we live in safe states like New York, where I live, and where she won, and vote for her in swing states such as Florida or Ohio, which they did and yet she still lost.

    We the first targets of Trump’s xenophobic thuggery and dangerous delusions, we the Muslims, the Mexicans, the African-Americans, women, we are here at the forefront of defying Trump’s ignominy.

    Liberal America refuses to recognise its dangerously delusional blinkers. The anger and violence they wanted safely deposited in Clinton’s White House to unleash on other countries is now launched on Sanders’ and Stein’s supporters who they falsely and conveniently blame for having denied them that treacherous peace of mind.

    Their beloved Barack Obama gifted the Zionist settler colony $38bn in military expenditure over the next 10 years in a lovely liberal gesture to maim and murder more Palestinians, as would have Clinton in even more generous terms, were she to be elected.

    OPINION: Why I will not vote in this US presidential election

    That they don’t mind. But having Trump preside over their national destiny, that they will not tolerate.

    The vulgarity of such accusations, however, is a diversionary tactic, consciously or unconsciously launched to pre-empt a far deeper soul-searching now necessary to hold and heal the soul of this nation.

    Sanders and his supporters had been continuously warning against this outcome for months, when Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Donna Brazile, and the entire leadership of the Democratic Party came together to dismantle and sabotage his campaign, and send a deeply flawed candidate to face the monstrosity of Trump.
    Bringing the US in the fold of humanity

    But such recriminations, left or right, are at this point a waste of time and a distraction. Soul-searching yes, witch-hunt no.

    There should be rethinking of the politics of race and gender, but not at the expense of suspending critical judgment on the global warmongering which Obama inherited from George W Bush and institutionalised chapter and verse, and which Clinton would have widely exacerbated.

    There is no mystery to this result of choosing Trump over Clinton: This is almost the same population that over the past eight years twice elected an African-American to the White House.
    US election: How Muslim Americans are dealing with Trump’s victory

    What happened this year? In its jeremiad mourning for its favourite candidate even The New York Times had to admit what happened: “Democratic Party … attempted a Clinton restoration at a moment when the nation was impatient to escape the status quo.”

    Sanders was the ready and riding answer to that historic call. But what did the Democratic establishment, The New York Times and Washington Post included, do to Sanders?

    Trump is rightly seen as “a twisted caricature of every rotten reflex of the radical right”. But to fight this banality, we need to go far beyond useless recriminations and reach much deeper into the troubled heart of America itself: a racist, misogynist, ignorant, paranoid, xenophobic, white supremacist America. No liberal sugar-coating of these facts will wish them away.

    OPINION: Donald Trump – The Islamophobia president

    Faulkner thought “the basest of all things is to be afraid”. Then he daringly, defiantly and triumphantly declared: “I refuse to accept this. I believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail.”

    But how is that prevailing to occur? First and foremost, by collapsing the false binary between the safe inside and the troubled outside. The US militarism has just gone through two successive phases of two terms of Bush’s neoconservative and Obama’s neoliberal imperialism. It has left the earth in shattered chards.

    The US will now need its most recent immigrants more than ever to help it learn how to survive this Trumpian calamity. We have been there: at the receiving end of the US-made Donald Trumps of the world.

    We the tyrannised, we the abused, the dispossessed, the forsaken, we in need of US “humanitarian interventions”, we the refugees of wars US liberal imperialism has caused around the world, we the Palestinians, the Libyans, the Iraqis, the Afghans, the Latin Americans, the Africans, we are all here: Trump’s worse nightmare and battle-tested in fighting the bullies of the world.

    We the first targets of Trump’s xenophobic thuggery and dangerous delusions, we the Muslims, the Mexicans, the African-Americans, women, we are here at the forefront of defying Trump’s ignominy.

    Along with millions of other Americans, we the most recent immigrants are now safely home at the dangerous delusions of an angry mob of white supremacist zombies shielding its wild fantasies behind democratic politics.

    The comfort zone of liberal fantasies of peace at home and warmongering abroad is now completely erased.

    The underbelly of the US is exposed for the whole world to see. Let the calamity of Trump do for the US at large what 9/11 failed to do: to bring Americans back to the fold of humanity – with fear and trembling like everyone else, with insecurity fighting the indignity of an ignorant tyrant, seeking to secure a modicum of self-respect in the bewildered belly of this warring beast.

    Hamid Dabashi is Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature at Columbia University in New York.

    The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial policies.

    #57167
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – November 7, 2016

    (Opening Remarks):
    “When you lose consecutively like we did there’s always a point of emphasis, or a focus that goes in, to see what’s going on. Obviously, as a staff today, as we looked at the tape, some things came up that were – I guess I’m stating the obvious with respect to them – but ten points in the last two weeks offensively is not going to get it done. That’s by and large the biggest issue that we’re facing right now, is our lack of ability to score points. Then of course, on the other side of the ball, on defense, we’ve had one turnover in the last three weeks. When you only get one turnover, it’s hard to turn the ball over to your offense. We’re not playing particularly well on third down defensively, so we’re not getting the additional drives or the opportunities for big plays. We all see it and I think the biggest challenge for us offensively is running the football. (RB) Todd’s (Gurley) not getting enough carries, our passing numbers were skewed. But if you’re realistic, we’ve had a lot of two-minute snaps the last two weeks. Those people that are saying that we are throwing it almost 50 times a game and running it 20 or 25, well 15 or so of those plays in each one of the last two games have been in two-minute, at the end. We’re doing whatever we can to try and win games, it’s just not happening.

    “We put it in perspective for the players. Players understand. As we told them, we need to flip the switch, we’re in the second half of the season. Our goal, like anybody else in the league right now, is to compete and contend for the division. That starts with a potential win, a great week of preparation rather, and then a win here at New York (Jets). From a health stand point, we’re good – I think we’re better than most teams right now. I may have mentioned to you after the game, but we started the same 22 players yesterday that we basically started in the opener. That’s encouraging and we’re just going to keep working at it, get them back, and have a good week – got a long trip and go out and should we put one together. But understanding that the only change you have to put together is to score points – we need to do that.”

    (On where things are at with the quarterback situation)
    “Case (Keenum) is starting.”

    (On what specifically is QB Jared Goff missing in order to become the starter quarterback)
    “Jared is improving. I keep saying that as you guys keep asking the questions, he’s improving. But, Case right now, especially against this defense, give us our best chance. It’s an extremely complicated defense, and they can pressure the quarterback, they can do anything they want to do. They’re very, very talented. Our focus is this week against the Jets, and Case will be under center.”

    (On what specifically is Goff improving on, and what has he not mastered in order to give him enough confidence to insert him as the starter)
    “I’ve been saying from day one, we’re going to play him when the time is right, and when he’s ready. With each passing week, he’s getting better and better. He’s better understanding, he recognizes things, he’s prepared, he understands the challenges week-to-week. There was a moment yesterday when Case came out. He had an extreme contusion to his non-throwing hand, and there was a chance – we didn’t know on the sideline – but there was a potential chance for a fracture. So, I said, ‘Jared, get warmed up. Get ready to go.’ He goes, ‘Coach, I’m ready.’ I said, ‘I know you are. Let’s see where Case’s forearm is, and we’ll go from there.’ Then, it was determined that is was just a contusion and not a fracture. But, that’s his mindset. I know everybody wants to talk about it, and that’s the big question. Again, he’s going to play. Whether it’s the following week, or the following week, or what have you, it’s eventually going to happen. The big picture, as I keep saying, this is about making sure that he’s ready to go out there and be sharp, and give us a chance to win. The quarterback position is not easy – Andy Dalton, (Philip) Rivers, Jay Cutler, (Drew) Brees, (Andrew) Luck, Cam Newton, (Ben) Roethlisberger, (Joe) Flacco, and (Aaron) Rodgers, that’s a good list – That’s an impressive list of quarterbacks. The one thing they have in common – two things rather – other than being really, really good quarterbacks, a number of them have rings, is right now, their records are .500 or worse. So, that shows you how hard it is to play at the quarterback position. We’re taking our time, we’re being patient, and when we feel it’s the right time, he’ll be under center.”

    (On if there will be a tipping point to when Goff will start) OR (On if Goff will be the starter if the team falls out of playoff contention)
    “I don’t think the playoff contention is fair to the football team, so we’ll see. Our expectations are we’re going to stay in it, so we’ll see. I’m not ruling out the possibility that he’ll make a playoff run for us as well. But for right now, Case is starting and we’re going to New York.”

    (On if the challenge to incorporate RB Todd Gurley in the run game was harder than he had anticipated coming into the season)
    “Yeah, good question. It’s been a much greater challenge. Defenses are saying, ‘Don’t let Gurley or Tavon beat you and put the ball down the field.’ We’ve got to do a better job, we recognize that. Todd’s number of carries the last few weeks are not what we would like. I think they’re 15, 14, and 12. Those numbers need to get up in the 20s. Again, they’re offset a little bit by our third-down stuff, in addition to the two-minute snaps. But, his touches and his numbers need to increase significantly. That’s what we discussed, and what we’re working on right now offensively.”

    (On why RB Benny Cunningham is better suited for the two-minute offense than Gurley)
    “There’s nothing that Todd doesn’t give us in two-minutes, and there’s nothing that Todd can’t do on third down. We have a tandem, we have one, two, we’ve got Todd on first and second down, because we have so much trust in Benny on the third down stuff. Again, Benny can make plays, because you’ve seen him make plays. That’s kind of how we deploy our personnel. Todd was in on some third down reps, but when we go to two-minute, or we’re in the third-and-long, or something like that, Benny is the back that gives us the opportunity. Todd understands everything. It’s just a matter of – I don’t want to say not committing to Todd – but, Todd is going to need a break. He needs a break every once in a while, and basically our philosophy going in, that’s how we’ve been since Benny has been productive for us, that Benny has been our third down guy and two-minute, and Todd has been our bell cow during the other series.”

    (On how he would evaluate the offensive line’s performance)
    “We gave up four sacks and that’s not good – although, this defense sacked (Cardinals QB) Carson Palmer eight times the week before. So, there were some good things in the game. There were a couple mistakes, a couple holding penalties, but we’re healthy and we’re progressing. Our offensive struggles are related to the entire team – you can’t blame it all on the offensive line, we had five drops yesterday, we dropped a touchdown pass you can’t blame that on the offensive line. You catch the touchdown pass and you’re lucky to kick a 55-yard field goal, the game’s different, we win and our offensive line played pretty good against one of the better defensive fronts in the league. I think you have to be realistic and keep things in perspective.”

    (On if not having an official determination on his future makes him uncomfortable)
    “No, I’m not uncomfortable at all. I’m uncomfortable because I didn’t expect to be three-and-whatever we are, okay, but I’m not uncomfortable at all. I never look over my shoulder, we’re moving on. (Rams Owner/Chairman) Stan (Kroenke) and I are on the same page, he understands what we’ve been through, he’s as disappointed as I am at the losses – two three-points and a seven-point in the last three games. He understands that we’re competitive and we’re doing everything we possibly can to get this turned around.”

    (On if he has to keep an eye on how the defense is doing mentally to make sure they don’t start to get frustrated)
    “What we’re going to do, we’re going to get the defense to help the offense on the practice field, that’s how you handle that. The defense gave up 31 points three weeks ago in Detroit – or three games ago. Every week there’s a different challenge. I thought, in the game defensively, it was one of our better efforts. I thought the game-planning was outstanding, the coaches did an outstanding job, the players responded, we got everybody back, we didn’t get the turnovers, but we bottled up a very, very explosive offense and held them to 13 points. If you’re a defensive guy, the 13 points was too much because we didn’t win the football game. The attitudes are different on both sides of the ball. But, no, I’m not concerned about the defense, they played really hard, they played smart, they played fast, they played physical – there was a lot of contact in the game. We just have to make sure that that becomes our standard.”

    (On what he thought of the 10 penalties on Sunday)
    “We did have 10. The two on special teams, I disagreed with. The holding penalty on (DE) Eugene (Sims) on the reverse, I really completely disagreed with it. The same thing with (RB) Chase’s (Reynolds) penalty on the punt return, I didn’t agree with that, either. We had the two defensive offsides. The last penalty, which was on the onside kick, you can scratch that, that was just kind of one of those things that happens. But the holding penalties, the defensive offsides and then the DPI (defensive pass interference) – the DPI shouldn’t happen – (DB) Lamarcus (Joyner) should have played the ball better. Yeah, statistically, we had 10, I would acknowledge maybe six of them.”

    (On CB E.J. Gaines’ status)
    “Oh, he’s fine. Yeah, he’s fine.”

    (On if the penalties, the drops and the inconsistencies are a matter of coaching or personnel and how he addresses it)
    “It’s hard to talk in general terms about it. For example, we’re behind in the game and their best asset on defense is rushing the passer and (T) Rob (Havenstein) gives up an inside move – he’s been playing well the whole game – gives up and inside move and grabs to make sure the quarterback is not hit. That’s not an athletic-ability deficiency at the right tackle, it’s just one of those things that happens. You have to look at each one of those penalties, in particular, to come to conclusion on that. Nonetheless, the penalties, we had two defensive offsides, (DT) Cam (Thomas) and (DE) Rob (Quinn) just were drawn offsides, they shouldn’t be drawn offsides – they should never be drawn offsides at home – but they were trying to rush the passer. Again, the special teams penalties, I disagreed with. We don’t allow those things to happen on the practice field, we coach them. I disagreed with a number of calls. This particular crew was the crew that did the Oakland-Tampa Bay game last week, so that’ll tell you something.”

    (On WR Pharoh Cooper and TE Tyler Higbee getting more integrated into the offense)
    “Yeah, ‘Higs’ made the big play – it was a great throw by Case, ‘Higs’ came up and made the big play. He needs to play better, he’s starting to figure it out now and we’ve got him involved. He needs to be better at the point of attack and he knows that. Nonetheless, he did come down with the big catch and a field position change. ‘Coop,’ he’s healthy, we worked him into the offense last week. For all intents and purposes, we’re going to continue to work him in and he’ll probably see a little bit more playing time offensively. I’m pleased with where he is right now. We just need to get the ball in his hands. Then again, I’m adding another person to the list that we need to get the ball in his hands – Gurley and Tavon. He’s a playmaker, he’s taken on his special teams responsibilities and he’s accepted them. He’ll be able, I think, you’ll see more of him. I’d like to be able to keep him up now.”

    #56995
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    For at least the past 12 years this Rams team has been an organized crime.

    ———-

    Its a 13 year plan. Be patient.

    w
    v

    #56826
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – November 4, 2016

    (On how the bye week has helped the team prepare for Carolina)

    “Off hand, I know Kansas City’s schedule. (Head Coach) Andy (Reid) has got a great record. I haven’t paid much attention to it, but the things that we stress are, obviously, the things that are timing related, and then penalties. We worked that this week, we talked about it, we’ve addressed it. We’ll start fast, we’ll be emotional, because we’re back home playing an outstanding opponent.”

    (On if the team will do anything different defensively, against QB Cam Newton)

    “I think everybody structures their plan a little differently against Carolina. First and foremost, you’ve got to defend the run. Then in passing situations, you have to be intelligent with your rush plan, because he can pull it down and run for first downs. Once they get close, they like to use him as a runner. So, we adjust the game plan accordingly.”

    (On what RB Todd Gurley has to do in order to improve)

    “It’s not a Gurley thing, I think it’s more of a team thing, and then it’s an opponent issue too, because they’re stopping it, they’re loading up. Like I said, we need to get it going. It’s November, and we need to get it going. What bigger challenge we’re going to have getting the run game going against this defense. This defense is really sound, and solid, especially with Luke (Kuechly) in there. Luke is telling everybody what’s going to happen before the ball is snapped. You got to give him some different looks. We got to finish, hit some creases, get receivers more involved in the blocking, and the concepts, and the schemes, and try to get Todd and Benny (Cunningham) creases. Run it in passing situations, and throw it in run situations.”

    (On if Gurley needs to make any adjustments to his game)

    “No, we grade everybody. You’d like to see him make somebody miss, or break a tackle. He should win against defensive backs, especially corners. But, I’m not, by any means, down on Todd.”

    (On if he feels QB Case Keenum is eager to improve on his last performance)

    “Case is the same every week. He loves to play, he loves to compete, he loves to prepare, practice. I know he’s a little disappointed in two of the interceptions, and the other two we don’t put on him. The week before, he put together a winning effort at Detroit. He’s excited, I know he’s excited, he’s prepared. He gets here before I get here in the morning, and I get in pretty early.”

    (On if he feels as if Carolina’s secondary is an area in which the offense can exploit)

    “I think we have a good plan going in to be able to mix and match our offense. Their secondary, even though they’re young, they’re improving weekly, and that’s what happens when you get snaps. They’ve gotten a lot of snaps. It’s not one of those games where you say, ‘Oh, we’re going to go after him, or go after him.’ We have to be sound, and the quarterback has to go through the progressions. Their secondary is not the issue. Like I said, just look at the quarterbacks. You have got a young secondary, look at the quarterbacks they’ve faced over the three or four weeks, that’s quite a challenge.”

    (On CB Trumaine Johnson’s status)

    “Trumaine was limited today in practice, and he’s listed as questionable, as is (DE) William (Hayes) and (DT Michael Brockers) ‘Brock’ and (RG) Jamon (Brown). I think the only we’ve listed as out is (WR) Nelson (Spruce). Everybody else is limited and questionable.”

    ***

    Rams Defensive Coordinator Gregg Williams – November 4, 2016

    (On the challenge of stopping Panthers QB Cam Newton)

    “I’ve had some experience being in that division when he came in as a rookie, playing him twice a year. I have tremendous respect for him. When you guys get a chance, if you haven’t seen him before, up front, in person, he looks better than our defensive ends. He’s got a defensive end’s body, he’s 6-6, 260 (lbs.), can run like a defensive back, running back – a great athlete. A lot of those guys like him play in the NBA and this guy’s playing in the National Football League because he’s tough enough to do it. He brings some different things to the game, and I think (Panthers offensive coordinator) Mike Shula does a great job on what they do, offensively, to fit the skillset of his players, including the quarterback. Mike and I were together at Jacksonville, so I’ve known some things and he was there at Carolina when I was at the Saints. There’s still some familiarity of what they’re doing, conceptually, but each year he’s gotten better. As quarterbacks in our league, the guys that can stay healthy and move on through the league, it’s amazing how smart they get, as far as the feel for the game and they turn into coordinators. They’re giving him a lot of freedom to do a lot of checks and a lot of different things at the line of scrimmage. So we’ve got our work cut out for us. We’ve got to play well, we’ve got to play good.”

    (On if the attention that has been paid to Newton this week, with regards to late hits, is worth a conversation with the defense going into this game)

    “It really isn’t, with our guys, we play a certain way inside the white lines anyway. They really haven’t even focused anything on it. We’re just going to play football the way we are – and our guys play well, we’ve got some good team speed, we’re going to have to play the run really well there. They’re a really good run team and they take their calculated shots. They’ve got one of the tight ends that’s in this league, that’s one of the best pass-receiving tight ends in our league in Greg Olsen. Dynamically, all put together offensively, they pose some big time problems and we’re going to have to be up for it.”

    (On Newton speaking with Commissioner Roger Goodell)

    “No, we don’t worry about that, we just play ball. We really don’t, we just play football.”

    (On how a healthy RB Jonathan Stewart changes what the Panthers do)

    “He’s an extremely hard-nosed runner, but people don’t realize how fast he is. We liken him to, in this division, when Frank Gore was at his best (with the 49ers). We’ve tried to picture that to some of our players that have played against Frank in Frank’s prime, too, that they’re very similar to how they play – great pad level, can run over you in the A and the B-gaps inside the run, but don’t give on him, don’t think that he can’t outrun you outside. He’s a better pass-receiver year after year after year. Again, he’s one of those all-purpose, versatile running backs that we’ve had some experiences with. Now, can we do the same thing with him?”

    (On Carolina’s wide receivers having a size advantage on Los Angeles’ cornerbacks)

    “We’ve had some experience with that already this year, we had some experience with the Giants. But, really, when you take a look at Tampa Bay’s receivers, Tampa Bay’s receivers were some of the tallest that we could go against in the league, too. Those are just things; we have some tall receivers here in practice, so we get that picture all the time. So that’s no excuse for us, we just have to play.”

    (On who sees the most pressure on the defense when playing against a running quarterback)

    “It really has to do with what kind of a call we’re in. You would love to always say it’s defensive line, but it’s not, it could be our safeties, our linebackers and our defensive line. Conceptually, our defensive line will be the first ones there on how we go about making sure we balance the rush and have good rush discipline. But it’s all of us and it really, kind of, depends on whether it’s a man call, zone call, pressure call, all that kind of stuff. You can’t predict what you’re going to be in.”

    (On if he senses that the players are antsy coming off the bye week)

    “It’s fun to see how much energy they have. I’ve been teasing all week long that it brings me back to my day care, managing young kids and all that kind of stuff when I had young kids growing up. And that’s that there’s a lot of energy, they can’t wait to get on the practice field, they’ve been chippy in the locker room – I’m sure you guys have seen some of the battles and the competitions that have been going on all this week. It’s time to play. Now, I would be worried if it wasn’t this way, it would bother me. But I’m not worried about it because they’re ready to play. They’re real chippy, they just need a way to get this release and, hopefully, they’ve saved enough for Sunday to have the release that we want.”

    (On the health of the defense)

    “What we do is, in all honestly, we don’t worry a whole lot about that. Because if you’re on an active roster, and we’ve done a good job building our roster and we have a very defined ‘next man up’ philosophy. Our D-line is getting healthier, but all those guys can play – our secondary, our young guys have stepped up and done really well, and our linebackers have done very well. We’ve got a lot of youth in that linebacker crew and you’re going to see a few more of those guys get some more playing time now. The bye week was good for all of them. And health-wise, we’re getting close; but again, whoever Coach Fisher says is active, those are the guys we have on gameday and we’re ready to go, no matter who it is.”

    ***

    Rams RB Todd Gurley – November 4, 2016

    (On how excited the team is to play at home on Sunday after coming off the bye week)

    “Pretty excited. It feels like it’s been forever since we played at home. We just have to get rid that losing streak and get a winning game.”

    (On how hopeful he is that things will start opening up for him during the second half of the season)

    “You just have to stay patient, stick to the plan, keep going out there, and work hard – just hope that things open up and I’m pretty sure they will.”

    (On if he thinks he’ll see more action in the pass game on Sunday in hopes of exposing an inexperienced Carolina secondary)

    “I think that whatever coach calls out there, he’s going to do a good job of putting us in a good situation. Just going out there and doing my job and trying to make a play after catching the ball. Whatever he calls, I’ll be ready for it.”

    (On how he spent his time off during the bye week)

    “I went back home to see my family and friends. I had a good time.”

    (On whether the bye week came at the right time for him personally)

    “It felt like it was the perfect time. I don’t know how many away games we’ve had, probably about five and we went on two away games in a row, went all the way to London, and then came back for the bye week. I felt like it definitely couldn’t have happened at a more perfect time.”

    (On what stands out to him when looking at the Panthers defense)

    “Obviously looking at the last game, probably one of their best games overall. Great, great, physical front seven. Linebackers are great – they know what you’re going to do before the ball…You just have to play your game and make sure that you’re studying them as good as they’re studying you, and just beat your man, one-on-one.”

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    MMQB: Ready or Not, Is It Jared Goff’s Time?

    On the heels of three straight losses, calls for the Rams to hand the reins to the No. 1 overall pick are heating up. Is it just a matter of L.A. sticking to a long-term plan, or is there something more that’s keeping Jared Goff off the field?

    Emily Kaplan

    http://mmqb.si.com/mmqb/2016/11/03/nfl-rams-jared-goff-when-will-he-take-over-rams

    THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. — Los Angeles waited two decades for its NFL team to return. So forgive Rams fans if they’re impatient regarding their anointed franchise quarterback, Jared Goff. Seven months after L.A. shipped a slew of high draft picks, including its No. 1 in 2017, to Tennessee for the right to select the Cal quarterback first overall, Goff has yet to play a down in the NFL. While five other rookie quarterbacks have started games this season, the No. 1 pick sits behind Case Keenum, who has the league’s fifth-lowest passer rating and threw four picks in his most recent game, the 17-10 loss to the Giants in London that dropped the Rams to 3-4.
    Coach Jeff Fisher maintains that Goff will start “when he’s ready,” but calls for a quarterback change have swelled to the point that, in an interview at practice on Wednesday, Fisher felt obligated to say: “Jared Goff is still our quarterback of the future. He’s still our franchise quarterback, still in our long-term plans. It was a great trade.”

    As to whether he’s in the Rams’ short-term plans, and if so when he might play, Fisher declined to offer any timetable: “The worst thing we can do to Jared is say, ‘Hey, here is when it’s going to happen.’” The logical question, especially given the early success of Carson Wentz in Philadelphia and Dak Prescott in Dallas, is: Why isn’t Goff playing? What exactly are coaches working on, and why has the process dragged on for the better part of a year?
    “I get it, that’s the big concern right now,” quarterbacks coach Chris Weinke told The MMQB. “Here’s the No. 1 pick, other guys have played, it’s human nature to question, why hasn’t this guy? The simplest answer is it’s a process. We’re not working on one particular thing. We’re really working on a number of variables. Could he be playing right now? Is he capable of playing in the National Football League right now? My answer would be yes. But if we’re being truly honest with ourselves, and we knew when we went through the process of drafting him, we knew it was going to take some time, and we were OK with that.”
    The Rams, privately and publicly, will remind outsiders that the Eagles initially planned to reshirt Wentz, and that Prescott is only starting because of Tony Romo’s injury. But the success of those rookies—specifically of Prescott who, like Goff at Cal, played in a spread offense at Mississippi State—legitimizes the question: If the Rams believe Goff is capable of playing in the NFL, why wait?

    Cultivating quarterback talent is a delicate and inexact art. A franchise’s fear is currently playing out in Jacksonville: The Jaguars wanted to sit Blake Bortles as a rookie in 2014, reversed course midseason, thrust the quarterback into action and may have stunted his long-term development. Two years later Bortles’ mechanics seem out of whack. This week the Jags QB summoned a private quarterback coach to Florida for recalibration. Such anecdotes seem to shape the Rams’ plan for Goff: mold the young quarterback into a polished product, then plug him in.
    “If Jared Goff is playing quarterback, we’re not going to change our offense,” Weinke says. “We have a library [of plays] where we are always able to cater to the quarterback. I mean, that’s just being smart. We do that for Case Keenum, and obviously for Goff we’ll do that as well, where we call things he’s comfortable with and likes. I think we’re being smart right now in not rushing him into a position—not that he’s going to fail, we’re not saying that—but we want to put him in a position to be successful.”
    Keenum’s subobtimal passing numbers—including four picks in the London loss to the Giants—have caused the calls for Goff to grow.

    Goff’s development may be taking slightly longer because the spread offense he played in at Cal drew on Mike Leach’s up-tempo, pass-happy Air Raid philosophy. While highly favorable to the stat line, Air Raid offenses don’t ask nearly as much of a quarterback in terms of his reads as do NFL pro-style attacks. Consider former Air Raid quarterbacks whose college productivity didn’t carry over (or hasn’t yet) to the NFL: Tim Couch, Nick Foles, Kevin Kolb, Johnny Manziel, Geno Smith, Brandon Weeden. In fact, Keenum may be the most successful former Air Raid quarterback in the league right now. In an interview last month for my college column about the Air Raid conundrum, Weeden—a 2012 first-round pick of the Browns who started 15 games as a rookie—brought up Goff’s situation unprompted: “I look at what the Rams are doing and I think it’s awesome,” Weeden said. “By having Case Keenum on the roster, Goff can have a year, a half a year, and redshirt to learn the NFL game. That’s huge. My rookie year, I had no idea what I was doing a lot of the time. I knew coverages, but they are just so much more complex, dissecting everything—it was impossible. I wish I had been in a situation like Goff’s where I wasn’t forced to be thrown into the fire.”

    * * *
    At Cal, Goff operated out of the shotgun. Now he’s under center, and the footwork is different. That was the first thing Weinke and Goff worked on. “The easiest thing I’ve found is to relate it to what he’s comfortable with,” Weinke says. Weinke explained to Goff that where he used to take a three-step drop from the shotgun, now it’s simply a five-step drop under center: just add two steps. Goff had been working on his five-step drop even before the draft process, and he had the footwork down by training camp in August.
    But it’s more complicated than just adding steps, Weinke notes. “He’s used to [having the ball snapped], getting the ball and going,” Weinke says. “Now he has to make decisions while he takes the ball.” So as Goff gets the ball at the line of scrimmage and retreats back to the position he’s comfortable with, he enters what Weinke calls “information overload.”
    “A veteran guy doesn’t have to think about his footwork—he just does it,” Weinke says. “A young guy, he’s always thinking, and then his motor skills slow down. He learned the language, then has to think functionally and act physically.” According to Weeden, whose college offense at Oklahoma State was similar to Goff’s, adjusting to turning your back to the defense was a tremendous struggle. “That’s a really hard thing to learn,” Weinke says. “It’s awkward to turn your back to linebackers, then get your eyes up and find the defenders again.”
    The complexities stretch beyond footwork. The terminology is different, and seven months after he was handed the playbook, Goff can, according to Weinke, “speak the language and articulate it.” But he also must execute it.
    At Cal, the quarterback had significantly fewer responsibilities. Tony Franklin, Goff’s offensive coordinator at Cal, often discussed how Goff was given more freedom than any of his previous quarterbacks. Indeed, Cal’s offense evolved with Goff over three years, as the coaches gave him more flexibility, according to Chris B. Brown, author of The Art of Smart Football, who has written about Air Raid offenses extensively. “By Goff’s final season he could change plays more often, and they were running variations of more formations,” Brown says. “They also did some stuff with protections on the back side, where they’d block the defensive line then let Goff read the linebackers, so it wasn’t totally like he was getting teed off.”

    Cal’s offense included run-pass options (RPOs) in which the quarterback, post-snap, chooses whether to run or pass the ball with a series of simplified reads. “As far as RPOs and packaged plays, nobody did it more than Cal,” Brown says. “Literally every play, it was layered on.”
    Brown explains further: “It was a binary read—two plays going at once. Look at the weak-side linebacker; if he does this, throw it here, and if he doesn’t, hand it off. It’s not necessarily, ‘Look at the coverage and then identify which side of the field he’s going to work and run a strict progression there.’ Which Goff can do, but he has to do it in a different context.”

    Says Weinke: “Conceptually there were things he did in college that we do here; we just call it something different or take it to the next level, where he always has to identify the linebackers, make protection changes, every play. As it relates to run-pass options and things he did in college? We have that in our offense, so we have those things he can do. But there is more now. We hear about it all the time—how the college game is transferring, or not transferring, to the NFL game at the quarterback position. Well, here’s a case where it just takes time.”
    Time means reps, and once the Rams determined in training camp that Goff wouldn’t be their starter, the bulk of first-team reps went to Keenum. While this slowed Goff’s learning process, it satisfied the Rams’ short-term interest (getting Keenum ready each week) while preserving the long-term vision. Fisher says the Rams decided to dress Goff as the third quarterback in Week 1 this season so he could see everything that Sean Mannion, the backup, did during the week to prepare. The next week Goff was promoted to No. 2 because the coaching staff felt he could play if needed. Last week’s bye afforded the opportunity for Goff to get a significant number first-team reps. But will he play?
    For now it appears the Rams will finish out the plan they committed to, whether it’s right or wrong: insert Goff when they believe he is perfectly polished, then hope the wait was worth it.

    #56778
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams seek recommitment to running game, Todd Gurley

    Alden Gonzalez

    http://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/31510/rams-seek-recommitment-to-running-game-todd-gurley

    THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. — The last time the Los Angeles Rams played — seemingly forever ago, but actually Oct. 23 — they attempted 53 passes, a total they hadn’t exceeded in more than three years.

    It is not ideal.

    “I was as surprised as anybody when I saw the stat sheet at the end,” said offensive coordinator Rob Boras, alluding to the fact that the Rams threw on 15 of their 20 first-down conversions during their 17-10 loss to the New York Giants from London. “… That’s not the way it was designed to play. Obviously, we want to run the ball.”

    It might not be by design, but the Rams have gone away from Todd Gurley over their past two games.

    Gurley averaged 3.97 yards per carry against the Detroit Lions and Giants, a subpar rate that was nonetheless better than the 2.74 yards he averaged through the first five weeks. In those two most recent matchups, though, Gurley only carried the ball a combined 29 times, with just 13 of those carries coming in the second half, even though they were basically one-possession games throughout.

    The Rams need to — and want to — get Gurley more involved, because relying on him for offense is typically a much better option than having Case Keenum try to beat opposing defenses down the field, regardless of Gurley’s struggles on the ground in 2016.

    For the season, Gurley ranks second-to-last in the NFL yards per carry (3.01) and dead last in average rushing yards before first contact (1.34). To counter, the Rams have looked to Gurley more frequently in the passing game. He has already been targeted as a receiver 26 times, only one fewer than his targets through 13 games as a rookie last season. His 21 catches tie his mark from 2015.

    “I think not being able to get things going in the running game, I improved a lot in the passing game,” Gurley said on a conference call with Panthers reporters ahead of Sunday’s visit from Carolina. “… Just staying patient and trusting the process. You’ve got to keep working hard even though something’s not going. Hard work doesn’t always pay off at the right time, but you still have to trust the process and keep going.”

    Gurley has now failed to reach 100 rushing yards in 14 of his past 15 games, a stunning stretch for such a gifted runner. The Panthers have given up the third-most passing yards per game but feature a talented front seven that has allowed only 3.26 rushing yards per carry, the lowest mark in the NFL. And like everybody else, they’ll be fixated on Gurley.

    “He’s still a dynamic player,” Panthers linebacker Luke Kuechly said. “He’s big, he’s powerful, he’s explosive. I think he’s a very unique running back that is a challenge for you. He can kind of do a little bit of everything. He’s not just a fast guy, he’s not just a strong guy, he’s not just a guy that can catch the ball out of the backfield. He’s able to do all three.”

    The Rams haven’t been able to display that man just yet. Getting there hinges on a trio of factors. It’s Keenum keeping defenses honest through the air, it’s Gurley having the patience to let holes materialize and, most important, it’s the offensive line improving. Rams guard Jamon Brown, who returned to practice seven days after undergoing minor surgery on his left hand, believes his unit has to “amp it up a little bit.”

    “We have to pay more attention to detail,” Brown said. “Just do more. Obviously we knew that everybody was going to have a plan for Todd, try to contain him. As an offensive line, we know that it takes work; it’s a grind. It’s not going to be perfect, but we just have to continue to put our bodies on other bodies and Todd will eventually do his thing.”

    #56643
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    Anybody ever talk to a car mechanic? I talk to em all the time
    cause i drive old beat-up cars. Anyway, everytime i talk to an old grizzled
    veteran car-guy, they always make a speech about how the parts they are forced
    to use are ‘shit’ nowadays. They remember times when this or that company made good parts. But now they are all made cheaply and they are not good quality no matter what the brand is.

    So my question is..is that true? Or just old people grousing about the good ole days.
    Are there any good companies left that make quality stuff — or have all the big corporations
    just decided to cut corners and sell junk for profit?

    Good companies will stress on quality and product differentiation and should not compete on price, but in most cases that’s not the case.

    Tough to translate in the business world, because customers value pricing as one of their decisions.

    But I think Apple does this very well. Their computers, laptops, iPhones are amazing devices and work extremely that are loaded with software suites that are very simple to use. Even though they are priced very high with high profitable margins they’ve marketed their brand well and have a customer loyalty…….

    Japanese automakers pioneered this while competing on price… penetrated the market in the mid to late 70’s with a very reliable car at good price and have bee able to ride that brand loyalty while increase their margins (prices)

    In addition….. to your mechanic’s point…., I took 3 years of HS Auto… and by far, today’s car parts and cars are much better in quality than they were 30-40s years ago. today’s electronic ignition, fuel injection, fuel pumps, shocks springs, brakes are by far much better however, they are tougher to diagnose for the home mechanic without proper diagnostic tools….. ……

    in the mid 70’s under the 90’s, US cars couldn’t compete quality wise to imports…. to bnw’s point about smog regulations, US Automakers (British automakers too) could not master those requirements and just built absolute crap.

    Here is a great NPR podcast on the UAW auto union of the 1970’s and the story of the GM plant in Fremont that was converted to the Numi plant to build Toyotas and GMs cars, ……..today it’s the Tesla plant….

    This is very cool and somewhat personal to me. I knew people that worked at both the GM and Ford plants ……My brother’s Pontiac GTO was built in this plant as was my Toyota Tacoma.

    I remember reading this and thinking to myself about the UAW behavior from friends that worked at GM….

    https://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/403/NUMMI

    Prologue.

    Ira Glass

    Today we have this story for you about cars– American cars. And like most stories about American cars lately, it’s more tragedy than comedy, though there is some comedy in there, too. It’s the story of a factory in California that captures pretty much everything that’s gone wrong in the American car business in the last 30 years. And at the heart of the story is the question, why are American cars still not as good as foreign cars?

    Come with me for just a half minute to the Detroit Auto Show, OK? David Champion is one of the umpires who calls strikes and fouls in the car business. He’s the senior director of Consumer Reports auto test division. He says that Ford has actually been improving for the last six or seven years, but Chrysler’s still in the dumps, the worst of all the car makers they study, and as for America’s biggest car maker, GM?

    David Champion

    The big Achilles’ heel with GM is their reliability. You look at things like the Cadillac CTS– a fabulous car, I’d take a CTS over a BMW or a Mercedes any day. But unfortunately, the CTS has been poor for reliability since it was redesigned in 2007. So they still quite haven’t got it.

    Ira Glass

    Why hasn’t GM got it yet? It’s not like this reliability problem just snuck up on them. It’s been nearly 50 years since it started losing market share– 50 years since it began the slide from holding over half the US car market, back in the ’60s, to just 22% today. Here’s an amazing fact. Even after Toyota’s recent disaster with suddenly accelerating cars that killed possibly 52 people, Consumer Reports came out with new ratings just this month and it still rates Toyota as more reliable than all the American car makers.

    That’s because the ratings are based on overall dependability– the likelihood of whether you’ll have a problem with your Toyota, and mostly, they are still very reliable cars. In fact, the top three automakers in the most recent Consumer Reports survey are all Japanese– Toyota is number three– and the top 10 are all foreign.

    Why is it taking so long for Detroit to figure out how to make a car as good as the Japanese? Well, there’s some very interesting answers to that question, and all of them can be found right here– at a car plant in Fremont, California, called NUMMI. NUMMI stands for New United Motor Manufacturing Incorporated.

    A modern car plant, by the way, sounds a lot like a casino. The automated gear plays little songs to let you know that it’s running. Driver-less robot carts glide up and down the aisles, like R2D2, delivering doors and other parts. Their song is supposed to warn you that they’re coming. The story of this factory is a famous one among car people– it’s taught at business schools.

    NUMMI was opened in 1984 by GM and Toyota together, who decided this would be a place that they would build cars with each other. If it seems strange to you that two competitors would do this, it seemed strange at the time, also. A headline in Car and Driver about the partnership read, “Hell Freezes Over.” But both companies had their reasons– we’ll get into that.

    At NUMMI, Toyota showed GM all its secrets– exactly how it made some of the best built, most reliable cars in the world back then. GM hoped to take these lessons from NUMMI and carry them into all their other plants, all over the country, and all over the world. And then, well, that didn’t go so well, and here we are today. GM went bankrupt. US taxpayers– you and I– bailed them out for $50 billion.

    And next week, the NUMMI car plant, the one that seemed like it might be able to teach American car makers how to catch up to their competitors, is going to stop making cars. It’s happening, no joke, on April Fools’ Day. Today we have a special story for you. We are devoting our entire show to it.

    For the last couple months, NPR’s automotive correspondent, Frank Langfitt and one of our producers, Brian Reed, have been traveling around the country talking to GM workers and managers about what happened at NUMMI, and especially about what went wrong at GM that it had so much trouble for so long adopting the techniques it learned over a quarter century ago.

    General Motors and the UAW are secretive cultures, but as you’ll hear, people were blunt when they talked to Frank– blunt in a way that you rarely hear with auto executives and UAW reps when they’re being interviewed by the press. Act one of our show is about the rise of NUMMI, act two is about what prevented GM from learning from NUMMI.

    From WBEZ Chicago, it’s This American Life, distributed by Public Radio International. I’m Ira Glass. Our show today produced with our colleagues at NPR News. And now it is my pleasure to turn the story over to NPR automotive correspondent, Frank Langfitt.

    Act One.

    Frank Langfitt

    When NUMMI was conceived, General Motors was far and away the world’s largest car company. Its US market share was seven times that of Toyota. But each company had a problem that the other company could help them solve. On GM’s side, the problem was small cars. Under government emissions guidelines, General Motors had to build them, but they’d always lost money for GM, and they were lousy quality. So Toyota suggested a joint venture that offered two things. First, Toyota would build a quality small car for GM– one that would finally turn a profit.

    Jeffrey Liker

    And the second thing was, we have this thing called the Toyota production system, and it produces the quality you see. We can teach you the Toyota production system.

    Frank Langfitt

    Jeffrey Liker is a professor of industrial engineering at the University of Michigan. He wrote The Toyota Way, and he’s been studying Japanese auto manufacturing– including NUMMI– since the 1980s. He says even though Toyota was offering GM something quite remarkable– to teach a competitor its secrets, to show them exactly how Toyota achieved such phenomenal reliability– GM wasn’t that interested.

    Jeffrey Liker

    Some people in GM I think had some foresight to realize this is important. I think for many of the senior leaders, it was more, OK, well, maybe I’ll learn something, maybe I won’t, but it won’t hurt.

    Frank Langfitt

    Why wouldn’t they be really interested in the Toyota production system, because at that point, wasn’t Toyota building higher quality cars?

    Jeffrey Liker

    Toyota was building higher quality cars. I’m not sure it was 100% accepted at that time by senior management that Japanese quality was really better.

    Frank Langfitt

    Why?

    Jeffrey Liker

    I think there was pride and defensiveness. I’m proud because I’m the biggest automaker in the world, I’ve been the best, I’ve dominated the market. You can’t teach me anything, you little Japanese company.

    John Shook

    I’m John Shook. Toyota in Toyota City was completely Japanese when I joined them. I was the first non Japanese to join them as a regular employee in Toyota City.

    Frank Langfitt

    John Shook moved to Japan in the early 1980s because of his fascination with Japanese management techniques. He read books about them back home in east Tennessee. And he decided to fly halfway around the globe, learn to speak the language, and hunt for a job with the biggest Japanese company that would have him. Toyota hired him to train American workers in the joint venture.

    Now, here was the problem that pushed Toyota into the deal. They needed to learn how to build cars in America. For years, the Japanese had been winning away customers from Detroit, and the US Congress was threatening to restrict car imports. Toyota could avoid that by making cars in the US. But they wanted a partner. Here’s John Shook.

    John Shook

    Toyota was looking specifically for things they could learn. How can we work with American workers? How can we make sure that our management system can work in North America? And they’d been pretty happy just producing in Toyota City, doing a very good job, and the idea of actually taking their system and producing outside of Toyota City was scary to them.

    Frank Langfitt

    Toyota was right to be scared. Compared to Japan, where auto workers and management worked together, labor relations in America were more like war. And at the GM plant in Fremont, it felt at times like hand to hand combat.

    A former running back from the University of Arkansas named Bruce Lee ran the western region for the United Auto Workers, and was in charge of the Fremont Union Local 1364. Now normally, somebody like Bruce Lee is supposed to defend his union members no matter what. But even he says they were awful.

    Bruce Lee

    It was considered the worst workforce in the automobile industry in the United States. And it was a reputation that was well earned. Everything was a fight. They spent more time on grievances and on things like that than they did on producing cars. They had strikes all the time. It was just chaos constantly.

    Jeffrey Liker

    The Fremont, California plant for General Motors was bad by GM standards, and GM’s average was bad by Toyota standards, so this is the worst among the bad mediocre plants in GM.

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, that’s Jeffrey Liker, who’s interviewed workers and management at Fremont for his research.

    Jeffrey Liker

    One of the expressions was, you can buy anything you want in the GM plant in Fremont. If you want sex, if you want drugs, if you want alcohol, it’s there. During breaks, during lunch time, if you want to gamble illegally– any illegal activity was available for the asking within that plant.

    Frank Langfitt

    Sounds like prison.

    Jeffrey Liker

    Actually the analogy to prison is a good analogy. Because the workers were stuck there, because they could not find anything close to that level of job, and pay, and benefits, at their level of education and skill. So they were trapped there. And they also felt like, we have a job for life, and the union will always protect us. So we’re stuck here, and it’s long term, and then all these illegal things crop up so we can entertain ourselves while we’re stuck here.

    Rick Madrid

    A lot of booze on the line. I mean, it was just amazing– and as long as you did your job, they really didn’t care.

    Frank Langfitt

    What kind of booze, what were people drinking?

    Rick Madrid

    Whiskey, gin.

    Frank Langfitt

    That’s Rick Madrid. He began working at the plant in 1955. He mounted tires on Chevy trucks.

    Rick Madrid

    When I was mounting tires, we’d drink. You know, I’d bring a thermos of screwdrivers with me. But I never was into drugs.

    Frank Langfitt

    Sex?

    Rick Madrid

    Love it.

    Frank Langfitt

    Did you ever have sex at the plant?

    Rick Madrid

    Yeah.

    Frank Langfitt

    Frequently?

    Rick Madrid

    I wasn’t that fortunate.

    Peter Ross

    There was a guy in there, he would be selling the pot.

    Frank Langfitt

    Peter Ross repaired machinery on the assembly line at GM.

    Peter Ross

    I’d be walking through the plant with my tools and my radio. You see a big cloud of smoke, you don’t want to inhale it, you’d get a contact high.

    Frank Langfitt

    If you’re wondering how people kept their jobs, well, back then the UAW was still quite powerful. Under the union contract, it was almost impossible to fire anybody, and if management ticked off the union, workers could just shut the plant down in minutes.

    With that sort of leverage, absenteeism became absurd. On a normal day, one out of five workers just didn’t show up. It was even worse on Mondays. Billy Haggerty worked in hood and fender assembly. He says so few workers showed up some mornings, management couldn’t start the line.

    Billy Haggerty

    They brought a lot of people off the street to fill in when they didn’t have enough people.

    Frank Langfitt

    Who would they find?

    Billy Haggerty

    Right across the street to the bar and grab people out of there and bring them in.

    Frank Langfitt

    Workers filed grievances– formal complaints against management– over all kinds of things. Someone who isn’t your boss asks you to clean something up? Hit him with a grievance. A manager steps in to do a job that isn’t his? Grievance. The strategy was simple. Pile up grievances real or imagined by the thousands, then use them to squeeze money or concessions out of management.

      And Fremont workers struck back at their bosses in other ways. They’d intentionally screw up the vehicles. Put coke bottles or loose bolts inside the door panels so they’d rattle and annoy the customer. They’d scratch cars. Richard Aguilar inspected vehicles at the plant. He saw one guy do something even worse

    .

    Richard Aguilar

    He left some loose bolts on the front suspension. That was dangerous. I went and told the system manager right away. They went out there and they checked, and there was like 400 cars he had done that to. He was mad because they had suspended him for drinking.

    Frank Langfitt

    By 1982, GM had had enough and put the Fremont factory out of its misery. The company laid off thousands of workers and closed the plant. The next year, when GM and Toyota began planning to reopen the plant for the joint venture, there was one thing neither company wanted to do– hire the same union leaders who’d battled management and overseen GM’s worst workforce. Then the UAW’s Bruce Lee sat down with chairman Eiji Toyoda.

    Bruce Lee

    And one of the first things I said is, “I’ve got to hire the first 50 people.”

    Frank Langfitt

    So who did you hire?

    Bruce Lee

    The same leadership that was in the union before.

    Frank Langfitt

    Why? I thought you would try to get rid of them.

    Bruce Lee

    No, no, because I believed that it was the system that made it bad, not the people.

    Frank Langfitt

    GM was against it, but incredibly, Toyota agreed. Toyota execs believed their system would turn bad workers into good ones. Then Lee had to sell the plan to the rank and file. He held a meeting and told union members that Fremont would now be a Japanese style plant. Old seniority rules wouldn’t apply, life at the plant would be totally different. The workers hated all this.

    Bruce Lee

    They didn’t want anything changed. They wanted the plant to open exactly how it was when General Motors had it.

    Frank Langfitt

    Bad cars and all?

    Bruce Lee

    That’s what they wanted.

    Frank Langfitt

    They even hung Lee in effigy. But Lee had something very powerful on his side– most of the workers desperately needed jobs, and Lee had them. When NUMMI opened, over 85% of the workforce were old hands from GM Fremont. But to prepare them for that moment, in the spring of 1984, Toyota started flying them to Japan in groups of 30 to begin learning the Toyota system for making cars.

    John Shook

    Well, when the NUMMI workers first came to Japan, me, and certainly my Japanese bosses, had heard all these horrible things about the American worker, about the American union.

    Frank Langfitt

    As the one American working in Toyota City, John Shook helped design this training.

    John Shook

    We had certainly heard all these stories about the workforce there at the Fremont plant. And it was our job to show them a new, very different way of working. What would they do? How would they respond to this? How would they react? And no one knew. I didn’t know. So everyone was very, very nervous.

    Earl Ferguson

    I was kind of apprehensive about what I was going to see when I arrived in Japan.

    Frank Langfitt

    On one of those planes was Earl Ferguson. He’d been working for GM since 1964.

    Frank Langfitt

    What were you apprehensive about?

    Earl Ferguson

    Whether they were going to accept us or not, you know. How they’re going to react when the Americans landed in Tokyo. Everything was so new to us, you know, this is just a totally new experience.

    John Shook

    So I will never forget–

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, John Shook.

    John Shook

    Taking a bus, a large bus, with my small group of Japanese colleagues to pick up the first group of trainees arriving from Fremont. Television cameras were there because this was big news in Japan at the time.

    [SPEAKING JAPANESE]

    John Shook

    As they got off the plane, we had signs welcoming them.

    Earl Ferguson

    The news media was everywhere. We were signing autographs and taking pictures with all the young kids. Totally new experience.

    John Shook

    Most of them had never been out of the United States before. None of them, certainly, had ever been to Japan.

    Les Myers

    My name is Les Myers. I’ve worked at General Motors for 25 years. My hobbies are fishing and bowling.

    Japanese Auto Worker

    My name is [UNINTELLIGIBLE PHRASE]. My hobby’s softball.

    Frank Langfitt

    The narrator in this Japanese public television program points out that the American worker is nine years older than his Toyota trainer. He also notes for his Japanese viewers that the Americans are so much larger than the Japanese they waste a second or two more each time they get in and out of the vehicles they’re building, which makes them 10 to 15% less productive than their Asian counterparts.

    The key to the Toyota production system was a principle so basic it sounds like an empty management slogan– teamwork. Back home in Fremont, GM supervisors ordered around large groups of workers. The Takaoka plant, people were divided into teams of just four or five– switch jobs every few hours to relieve the monotony. And a team leader would step in to help whenever anything went wrong.

    Again, Professor Jeffrey Liker and Toyota’s John Shook.

    Jeffrey Liker

    And they spent about two weeks, and they worked in a Toyota plant.

    John Shook

    Hooked up at the hip with a counterpart in the Corolla plant– someone who did the exact same job you would be doing back in Fremont.

    Jeffrey Liker

    And they start to do the job, and they were pretty proud because they were building cars back in the United States, and they wanted to show they could do it within the time allotted, and they would usually get behind. And they would struggle, and they would try to catch up, and at some point, somebody would come over and say, do you want me to help? And that was a revelation, because nobody in the GM plant would ever ask to help. They would come yell at you because you got behind.

    John Shook

    Really, we wanted to give them a chance to see and experience a different way of doing things. We wanted them to see the culture there, the way people work together to solve problems.

    Jeffrey Liker

    Then the biggest surprise was, when they had those problems, afterwards, somebody would come up to them and say, what are your ideas for improvement so we don’t have that problem again?

    Frank Langfitt

    So they’d make suggestions for a different kind of tool that would be better for the job, or a different place for bolts and parts to sit that would be easier to reach.

    Jeffrey Liker

    They couldn’t believe that responsiveness. I can’t remember anytime in my working life where anybody asked for my ideas to solve the problem. And they literally want to know, and when I tell them, they listen, and then suddenly, they disappear and somebody comes back with the tool that I just described– it’s built– and they say, “Try this.”

    Frank Langfitt

    Under the Toyota system, when a worker makes a suggestion that saves money, he gets a bonus of a few hundred dollars or so. Everyone’s expected to be looking for ways to improve the production process, all the time. This is the Japanese concept of kaizen, or continuous improvement.

    And if you look around a Toyota plant, you can see the result of all those improvements. You see mats for workers to stand on, special cushions they throw into the car frames when they have to kneel inside, hanging shelves that travel along with the car and the worker, carrying parts and bolts they need within easy reach. Similarly, workers tasks have been streamlined to the fewest possible steps, each step timed down to the second.

    Billy Haggerty

    Two seconds to pick up a bolt and put it on. Two seconds to take a gun and tighten it down.

    Frank Langfitt

    Billy Haggerty learned the Japanese system two decades into his tenure at GM Fremont.

    Billy Haggerty

    Everything was timed out, such and such takes such and such long to do– that’s the way you did it. At General Motors, you could be running in circles for whatever you were doing, and that’s the way it is. You lose time. A car a minute don’t seem like it’s moving that fast, but when you don’t get it, you’re in the hole. There’s nobody to pull you out at General Motors, so you’re going to let something go.

    Frank Langfitt

    All those mistakes added up at a GM plant, and the results were littered around the lots outside– hundreds of misassembled cars. Cars that came off the line missing parts. Cars that needed to be fixed before they could be shipped out to the dealers. In a Toyota plant, there was nothing like this. Why did a GM plant produce so many screwed up cars? One cardinal rule that everybody in the company knew.

    Billy Haggerty

    The line could never stop. Never stop the line.

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, Billy Haggerty, Jeffrey Liker, Rick Madrid, and Bruce Lee.

    Billy Haggerty

    Someone had a heart attack, kick him out the way, keep that line running.

    Jeffrey Liker

    It was a basic sin. You’re violating the 10 commandments.

    Rick Madrid

    You just don’t see the line stop. I saw a guy fall in the pit and they didn’t stop the line.

    Bruce Lee

    You saw a problem, you stop that line, you were fired.

    Frank Langfitt

    A long time GM manager named Ernie Schaefer explained why.

    Ernie Schaefer

    Because the theory was, they’ll stop it all the time. They don’t want to work, you know, they want to sit and play cards or whatever. You know, that was a free break for them, if the line stops, so you wouldn’t give them the ability to stop the line.

    Frank Langfitt

    John Shook, the American who helped Toyota design its training program, says this all goes back to the first assembly line created by Henry Ford.

    John Shook

    What Henry Ford had basically designed was a system that– he wanted the people on the floor to simply get the volume out, get the product out the door, and someone later will worry about the quality. If we have to repair it, we’ll repair it.

    So one of the most fundamental things that Toyota did was take that and turn it on its head. So that now we tell the plant floor, don’t you worry about the production volume, you worry about quality. The last thing we want is to have a lot of defects flowing down the line that we have to repair later.

    Billy Haggerty

    Toyota’s philosophy was quality, not quantity.

    Frank Langfitt

    In his old GM job, Billy Haggerty put on hoods and fenders, and saw lots of mistakes go right down the line. So we had Monte Carlos with Regal front ends, and vice versa, and they would just stick it on, run it out to the yard, and then change.

    Frank Langfitt

    What did they look like, the cars?

    Billy Haggerty

    Half Regals and half– so those things would go out the door into the yard and be fixed out there. I did a lot of overtime in the yard changing things back.

    Frank Langfitt

    Workers told me they saw cars with engines put in backwards, cars without steering wheels or brakes. Some were so messed up they wouldn’t start, and had to be towed off the line. Fixing them piled on more costs, and sometimes, taking them apart and putting them back together, workers damaged them even more.

    On the floor of the NUMMI plant in Fremont, Earl Ferguson showed me Toyota’s solution to all this. It’s a thin nylon rope that hangs on hooks along the assembly line, which became a symbol of everything that was different about the Japanese way of making cars– the andon cord.

    Earl Ferguson

    These cords hanging down, that’s the andon cord. It will stop the line. If he pulls the andon cord, then this light’s going to come on, right here. Then it’ll show up on the screen that this location is down.

    Frank Langfitt

    It also plays a surprisingly cheerful little song. Workers in each area can pick the tune. You hear it all the time in a Toyota plant. The first pull doesn’t stop the line, it summons team leaders to the location. They try to correct the problem, and usually, they can do it quickly without stopping production. But if they fail, the line stops.

    Earl Ferguson

    Then they’ll correct the problem, then you can pull the andon cord again, and the line will start.

    Frank Langfitt

    Now when was the first time you ever pulled an andon cord?

    Earl Ferguson

    1984.

    Frank Langfitt

    Where did you do it?

    Earl Ferguson

    In Japan.

    Frank Langfitt

    Were you at all nervous, because you’d been taught for so many years never to stop the line?

    Earl Ferguson

    Yeah. And it was really exciting. What got me was the fact that they had a cross bolt, and they stopped the line to repair it. Ream the hole, put the bolt back in, instead of sending it on and putting all the other junk on top of it, so you have to take it off and repair it. And whoever puts it back isn’t skilled in putting trim back, so they’re going to mess that up.

    That impressed me. Said, gee, that makes sense, fix it now so you don’t have to go through all this stuff. That’s when it dawned on me that we can do it– one bolt. One bolt changed my attitude.

    Jeffrey Liker

    I think that there was a combination of feelings. One feeling was, wow, this is different.

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, that’s industrial engineering professor Jeffrey Liker.

    Jeffrey Liker

    Another feeling was of embarrassment. We’ve been in this industry for how many years– my whole adult life– we’re Americans, we’re supposed to be the best, most important country in the world, and we can’t build a quality car. And these Japanese are doing it. And there was a sense of hurt pride.

    Earl Ferguson

    Well, it was kind of, you become a little bit ashamed, because why couldn’t we do that?

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, Earl Ferguson.

    Earl Ferguson

    You know, I think most of it was pride after that. We wanted to be able to compete with what I saw in Japan. I said, I know we can do what they can do.

    John Shook

    Only two weeks later when that first group left to go back to Fremont–

    Frank Langfitt

    Toyota trainer, John Shook.

    John Shook

    We had a party, of course, a sushi party– and this was years ago, before sushi was as it is now. It was still a rare thing, of course. And people were crying on both sides. You had union workers– grizzled old folks that had worked on the plant floor for 30 years, and they were hugging their Japanese counterparts, just absolutely in tears.

    Frank Langfitt

    There’s actually footage of this, though we don’t know if it’s the first group of Americans. US workers are in kimonos with the Toyota name on them. And they hand their neckties to the Japanese and hug. One man is crying.

    [SPEAKING JAPANESE]

    One of the Americans says, in Japanese, “Thanks to you all, we now feel confident for our success.” John Shook.

    John Shook

    And it might sound flowery to say 25 years later, but they had had such a powerful emotional experience of learning a new way of working, a way that people could actually work together collaboratively– as a team. We knew it wasn’t going to be easy– there were a lot of hurdles to overcome– but there was no question in anyone’s mind that this was going to work.

    Frank Langfitt

    But if it was going to work, it would mean a radically different relationship between workers and management. One where the managers trusted the workers to let them pull the andon cord and stop the line. One where the workers trusted their bosses enough to ask for help when there were problems.

    American Auto Worker

    With teamwork, we can do it all. [? Now let’s hold up your hands, and together– with teamwork, we can do it all.

    Frank Langfitt

    December, 1984, the first car rolled off the assembly line in Fremont, a yellow Chevy Nova. UAW rep Joel Smith was one of the speakers.

    Joel Smith

    Mr. Toyoda, staff, and fellow UAW members, today is a historic one– the first car. But we’re also on the threshold of a new adventure and relationship between labor and management. For too long, the American worker has been maligned, criticized, called bad names, for building lousy products. Poor quality American worker.

    At New United Motor, we will build a quality car, and we will only build a quality car. And Mr. Toyoda, if you would please deliver this challenge to our friends in Japan, we intend to build the best quality car in the world. Thank you.

    Bruce Lee

    They hit the ground running. It didn’t take a year, two years, to get quality in that product.

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, the UAW’s Bruce Lee.

    Bruce Lee

    Oh, I was so proud of them, you can’t even believe. The fact that they did it didn’t surprise me that much, but how quickly they did it did. It was amazing. Here was these same people, who before– I mean, hell, they’d go out of their way to make life miserable for General Motors particularly. And, you know, they were old, they were fat. Because that was not a young workforce that we brought in there.

    Frank Langfitt

    The numbers coming out of the NUMMI plant were astonishing. Again, here’s Jeffrey Liker.

    Jeffrey Liker

    The best measure they use is how many defects are there per 100 vehicles. And it was one of the best in America, and it was for the same for the Toyota cars that were made in California as the Corollas that were coming from Japan– right from the beginning.

    Maryann Keller, a long time car analyst, devotes a chapter to NUMMI in her book about the rise and fall of GM, Rude Awakening. After just three months, she says, the cars coming off the line were getting near perfect quality ratings. And just as important for GM were the cost savings. One study suggested, remarkably, it would probably take 50% more workers under the old system to build the same car.

    Grievances and absenteeism plummeted, and lots of workers preferred the NUMMI teamwork system to the old combative one at GM. Several told us they enjoyed coming to work for the first time.

    Rick Madrid

    I didn’t want to tell people I worked at the Chevy truck plant, because a lot of people had a lot of problems with them.

    Frank Langfitt

    That’s Rick Madrid, who spent 17 years at the old Fremont plant building Chevy trucks. He was ashamed of that vehicle. At NUMMI, making the Nova, he felt differently.

    Rick Madrid

    Oh I had a stack of these postcards, and I would just drive around, if I see a Nova parked, I would put one of these under the windshield wiper. Of course, it had my name, my address on it, and your opinion of the Nova. And just basically, they dropped me a line. And a lot of people did this.

    Frank Langfitt

    And what did they say?

    Rick Madrid

    Some said they really liked it, a quality car, a good car.

    Frank Langfitt

    Another worker told me he’d go to the Chevy dealership to stare at the Novas. He didn’t tell anyone he built them, or that he worked at NUMMI. He just liked seeing what the cars looked like, sitting there on the lot.

    Ira Glass

    That’s NPR’s Frank Langfitt. Coming up, so there’s this great way of making cars, GM is using it in California. Not only are the cars more reliable, they’re cheaper to make. Seems like a no-brainer for GM– start putting this way of producing cars into their other factories everywhere, and declare victory. Why they didn’t do that, why what happened at NUMMI stayed at NUMMI for so long, that’s in a minute from Chicago Public Radio and Public Radio International when our program continues.

    Act Two.

    Ira Glass

    It’s This American Life, I’m Ira Glass. If you’re just tuning in, we’re in the middle of a story about a car plant in Fremont, California, called NUMMI. We now turn to the question, why was it so hard for GM to replicate NUMMI elsewhere in the company. In the first half of our story, we heard a lot from workers who are on the factory floor. In this half of the story, the action moves to their bosses– the supervisors at GM, who had a chance to turn the company around with what they learned at NUMMI. Again, here’s NPR’s Frank Langfitt.

    Frank Langfitt

    GM had gotten the first thing it wanted out of NUMMI– a high quality small car. Now the question was, how could it spread the lessons of NUMMI throughout the rest of the company? To do that, it set up a special liaison office. Managers were flown in for tours, to work the assembly line for a few days, to learn the team concept.

    And from the beginning, GM executives sent 16 of their rising stars to help start NUMMI, with the idea that later they’d come home and change the company. Two Wall Street Journal reporters later dubbed them the NUMMI commandos. One of the 16 was Mark Hogan. He says the top brass understood NUMMI’s game changing potential– that a Toyota style plant squeezed many more cars out of far fewer workers.

    Mark Hogan

    If General Motors was able to take its many manufacturing facilities and implement that production system, each of those little changes adds up to billions to General Motors in the bottom line.

    Steve Bera

    We were ready, we were fired, and we had the mental condition that says, we’re going to do this, we’re going to change the world.

    Frank Langfitt

    That’s Steve Bera, another commando. He says once NUMMI was up and running, he and the other 15 waited to be deployed elsewhere for the next phase of their mission. But the company didn’t seem to know what to do with them.

    Steve Bera

    Instead of coming back to the 16 of us and saying, there’s some secret sauce here, what is it? How can we use this to our advantage? No one ever asked us that question.

    Frank Langfitt

    Why didn’t they do that?

    Steve Bera

    It was never part of a master plan. And if there was a master plan, none of us ever saw it.

    Frank Langfitt

    Frustrated, Steve Bera quit after just two years at NUMMI. With no master plan from Detroit, the first real attempt to do NUMMI again came from a factory manager 400 miles south of Fremont, at a plant in Van Nuys. The factory was facing a possible shut down.

    Its manager, a guy named Ernie Schaefer, had visited NUMMI, and he thought maybe he could save his plant if he adopted the Japanese system. But he didn’t have all the advantages Fremont had– this time, Toyota wasn’t a partner in the experiment. GM had to transform Van Nuys on its own. Ernie Schaefer knew it was going to be tough.

    Ernie Schaefer

    The thing that I think kept us moving forward is we had no alternative. I mean, it was pretty well known that if we didn’t successfully implement this philosophy in Van Nuys, we weren’t going to be around.

    Frank Langfitt

    Van Nuys made Firebirds and Camaros, and its reputation wasn’t much better than GM Fremont’s had been. Defective cars coming off the line, battles with the union, sabotage. So Ernie Schaefer enlisted the same UAW leader who got the union on board at NUMMI, Bruce Lee, to help him win over the Van Nuys workforce.

    They shut down the plant for two weeks to train everyone in team concept and quality control. For this workforce, there were no trips to Japan, no tearful sushi parties, and from the start, workers were skeptical.

    Larry Spiegel

    The lack of receptiveness to change was so deep–

    Frank Langfitt

    Larry Spiegel was another NUMMI commando. He moved down to Van Nuys to help launch the Japanese system there.

    Larry Spiegel

    There were too many people convinced that they didn’t need to have to change.

    Frank Langfitt

    Hadn’t General Motors threatened to close the plant?

    Larry Spiegel

    They didn’t believe it.

    Frank Langfitt

    Why?

    Larry Spiegel

    It’s not logical. They just didn’t.

    Frank Langfitt

    This was one of the biggest differences between Fremont and Van Nuys. Van Nuys hadn’t been shut down. Turns out, it’s a lot easier to get workers to change if they’ve lost their jobs and then you offer them back. Without that, many union members just saw the Toyota system as a threat.

    And they had a point. Under the Japanese system, Van Nuys stood to lose a fourth of its workforce, because the more efficient a plant becomes, the fewer workers it needs. And just as bad, the team concept hurt their seniority rights. This had been a problem for union members back at NUMMI also.

    Richard Aguilar

    Seniority is what you work for. To me, that’s what a union’s about, seniority.

    Frank Langfitt

    Richard Aguilar worked at NUMMI, and to him, seniority was just another way of saying fairness. He waited 15 years to get enough seniority for the job he’d always wanted in the plant. Under the new system, management could just hire someone off the street for that job. The whole idea of seniority placing you into one great job for years was impossible under the team concept. Workers had to learn every job on their team and take turns doing those jobs.

    Richard Aguilar

    And the team concept, it sounds good– I mean, team player sounds good. But it pit worker against worker, it really does.

    Frank Langfitt

    This was the other thing Richard hated about the Japanese system. The whole point of a union, its most basic principle, was to protect you from management. But once people were working in teams, Richard says, union members started doing things for management that just seemed wrong.

    Richard Aguilar

    People now snitched on each other. You know, they’d point fingers, oh, he’s not doing his job right, you know, or she’s not doing the job right. And they would even keep track of the stuff they’d missed. Because that’s what the company puts in them, that the only way you can protect your job, you have to keep the team strong, so if there’s a weak link, you’ve got to get rid of that weak link.

    And I would go tell them, you can’t do that. You can’t build a case for management against another union member. It made me angry and disappointed that the union had gone so backwards that they forgot what a union meant– taking care of each other.

    Frank Langfitt

    At Van Nuys, it wasn’t just union members who resisted the Japanese system. Managers didn’t like it either. They had their own privileges to protect. Some opposed the idea of stopping the assembly line because their bonuses depended on the number of cars that rolled off that line– never mind how many defects they had.

    And under the team concept, executives and workers all share the same cafeteria and parking lot. Managers at NUMMI didn’t have a problem with that, but the managers at Van Nuys?

    Bruce Lee

    They rioted.

    Frank Langfitt

    The UAW’s Bruce Lee remembers getting a phone call from plant supervisor Ernie Schaefer about his managers.

    Bruce Lee

    They’d basically told Ernie, you do that and we’re out of here. We’re going to quit en masse. Because Ernie called me, he said, “Bruce, I can’t do it. I can’t do it. I can’t do those things.” I said, “Just think about it, that’s a nothing. So they have to walk 20 yards more.” I said, “Isn’t that foolish that some grown man would come up and tell you, I’m going to quit if I can’t have this parking place right here.”

    Frank Langfitt

    So people fought the new system from both sides. Managers gave Ernie grief, and a dissident faction sprang up in the local union, which elected a staunch opponent of the Japanese system as their chairman. And as if that all wasn’t enough, Ernie Schaefer ran into another obstacle. Workers could only build cars as good as the parts they were given. At NUMMI, many of the parts came from Japan, and were really good. At Van Nuys, it was totally different.

    Ernie Schaefer

    That was perhaps one of our biggest failures, in that an isolated plant can’t do this by itself.

    Frank Langfitt

    The team concept stressed continuous improvement. If the team got a shipment of parts that didn’t fit, they were supposed to alert their bosses, who would then go to suppliers and engineers to fix the problem. All the departments in the company worked together.

    But Ernie’s suppliers had never operated in a system like that. If he asked for fixes, they blew him off. And if he called Detroit and asked them to redesign a part that wasn’t working, they’d ask him why he was so special– they didn’t have to change it for any other plant, why should they change it for him?

    Ernie Schaefer

    You had asked the question earlier, what’s different when you walk into the NUMMI plant? Well, you can see a lot of things different. But the one thing you don’t see is the system that supports the NUMMI plant. I don’t think, at that time, anybody understood the large nature of this system.

    General Motors was a kind of throw it over the wall organization. Each department, we were very compartmentalized, and you design that vehicle, and you’d throw it over the wall to the manufacturing guys.

    Frank Langfitt

    And if something didn’t work, or was impossible to assemble, that was their problem.

    Ernie Schaefer

    And they had to deal with it. And you’re in there, you’ve kind of put your heart and soul into making this whole team concept work, and now you’re the messenger that has to go out and say, “Look guys, even though this is the way the system’s supposed to work, and these are my issues, I’m not going to be able to solve them, and you’re going to have deal with it.” And it was destructive, it was detrimental, I mean, no question about it.

    Frank Langfitt

    Schaefer says, when he realized how much of the Japanese system happened off the factory floor, it answered something that had never quite made sense to him– why had Toyota been so open with GM in showing its operations?

    Ernie Schaefer

    You know, they never prohibited us from walking through the plant, understanding, even asking questions of some of their key people. I’ve often puzzled over that– why they did that. And I think they recognized, we were asking all the wrong questions. We didn’t understand this bigger picture thing.

    All of our questions were focused on the floor, the assembly plant, what’s happening on the line. That’s not the real issue. The issue is, how do you support that system with all the other functions that have to take place in the organization?

    Frank Langfitt

    Quality at Van Nuys didn’t improve, and in 1992, GM shut the plant down for good, leaving 2,600 people without jobs.

    This is what the NUMMI commandos were up against– entrenched, defensive bureaucracies and workers many of the places they turned. They were not only trying to change the biggest corporation in the world, they were trying to change a corporation that had been essentially a collection of individual car companies– Cadillac, Oldsmobile, Pontiac, Buick– each with its own design team, own leadership, and its own way of doing things.

    Dick Fuller

    It’s a whole new process, a whole different process than the one they’d grown up with. And it was a huge–

    Frank Langfitt

    Dick Fuller was another commando. He ran the information technology division at NUMMI, which used some of the same streamlining concepts employed on the factory floor. He says when GM managers visited NUMMI, instead of trying to figure out how they could benefit from the system, some of them attacked it. Fuller remembers one IT manager who visited from a plant on the East Coast.

    Dick Fuller

    And when he came back, he wrote a report, which if I put a title on it, would say, won’t work here. And I think part of that was a threat to him. It was a threat to him to see that that was working so well.

    Frank Langfitt

    Do you think this guy looked at this and said, well, if this works here and they try to spread it, I’ll lose my job?

    Dick Fuller

    Well, I don’t think he was going to lose his job, but he could lose some of his– you know, he’d probably have to give up half his staff. You know, that’s power. People is power in General Motors.

    Frank Langfitt

    Getting all these mini empires to embrace the kinds of radical changes that happened at NUMMI would have taken an almost Stalinesque leadership from above– a combination of charisma and fury in the corner office. And NUMMI commando Mark Hogan says no one at GM fit that bill.

    Mark Hogan

    I was very convinced that we had to change, and we had to change rapidly, and I think all of us that were NUMMI alums, so to speak, were frustrated at the lack of urgency.

    Frank Langfitt

    Did you have those kinds of conversations with people in the ’80s back in Detroit?

    Mark Hogan

    I did.

    Frank Langfitt

    What would people say to you?

    Mark Hogan

    Yeah, I think there still wasn’t a recognition that the– the formidability of the competition, particularly from Toyota. I think a lot of people were in denial, or just not willing to recognize it. And even though GM had gone from 50% market share in the early ’70s, to mid 30s, it was gradual over time and there wasn’t this sense of reaction or urgency that other companies that lost that much market share might have felt.

    Frank Langfitt

    Those exact numbers– GM went from 47% of the US market in the mid 1970s to 35% a decade later. One reason car execs were in denial was Detroit’s insular culture. Yes, unions and management were always at each other’s throats, and yes, GM and its suppliers had a destructive relationship that seemed to almost discourage quality, but everyone had settled into comfortable roles in this dysfunctional system and learned to live with it. And in the late 1980s, with their market share in free fall, Jeffrey Liker says they were more apt to blame others than themselves.

    Jeffrey Liker

    I worked with all the big three at the time, automakers, and it was common in all three automakers. They all believed that if the consumers think we have quality problems, it’s because Consumer Reports is misleading them, and they’re biased toward Toyota. They all believed that Consumer Reports was against them, that there was somewhat of a myth of Japanese quality.

    Frank Langfitt

    If all of that wasn’t enough to stymie attempts to learn from NUMMI, GM was distracted by other projects– massive projects. It bought Ross Perot’s company, Electronic Data Systems. It bought Hughes Aircraft for $5 billion. It decided the future was robotics. It decided the future was a massive, costly reorganization. It started Saturn, which produced cars that were better marketed than they were built. Then came the 1991 recession– car sales slumped. Again, Mark Hogan.

    Mark Hogan

    It was really its first significant wake up call. GM unfortunately had a massive loss, 1992– General Motors lost more than $20 billion. So I think at that point in time, there was a complete rethinking of the way we ran the company– that thing’s had to change, and they had to change fast.

    Frank Langfitt

    It was the largest loss in American corporate history to that time– $23.5 billion. GM’s board of directors responded with what the press called a boardroom blood bath, purging a long list of managers. Jack Smith took over as CEO. He was the executive who’d led the negotiations with Toyota to create NUMMI. He saw NUMMI as a way forward for GM. Mark Hogan and some of the other commandos felt they finally had a champion.

    Mark Hogan

    Jack Smith was installed, and started to rapidly implement the Toyota production system into General Motors.

    Frank Langfitt

    Rapidly by GM’s standards, which wasn’t nearly rapidly enough. Jack Smith declined to talk to me for this story, but he told a reporter a few years ago, “I just wish it had happened a lot faster than it did.” Pick your nautical cliche– reforming General Motors was like turning around a battleship, one manager said. Another compared it to steering the Titanic with a canoe paddle.

    Jeffrey Liker says the cultural gap between NUMMI and the rest of GM was so vast that even with clear marching orders to change, some of the people running the company didn’t know where to begin.

    Jeffrey Liker

    There was no vocabulary, even, to explain it. So I remember, one of the GM managers was ordered, from a very senior level– came from vice president– to make a GM plant look like NUMMI. And he said, “I want you to go there with cameras and take a picture of every square inch. And whatever you take a picture of, I want it to look like that in our plant. There should be no excuse for why we’re different than NUMMI, why our quality is lower, why our productivity isn’t as high, because you’re going to copy everything you see.”

    Immediately, this guy knew that was crazy. We can’t copy employee motivation, we can’t copy good relationships between the union and management. That’s not something you can copy, and you can’t even take a photograph of it.

    Frank Langfitt

    The first round of changes put andon cords and Japanese style inventory control into the GM plants. But there was no change in the culture. Workers and managers continued their old antagonistic ways. In some of the factories where they installed the andon cord, workers got yelled at when they pulled it. A few plants even cut the cords down.

    So the second round of changes included some team concepts. They put together a book explaining how each plant should run, and the reasoning behind it. Geoff Weller was one of the people dispatched in the 1990s to convert the company plant by plant. Weller says some factory managers were receptive, but in the sprawling, decentralized system, the plant manager was still king and ran the factory the way he wanted.

    Geoff Weller

    We had some tough goes in some of our facilities, where we spent more time trying to convince the plant leadership, versus actually going on and doing the implementation. I would say– I was asked in one plant to leave, because they were not interested in what I had to sell.

    Frank Langfitt

    How did he actually ask you to leave? What’d he say?

    Geoff Weller

    We’re finished, and you can leave.

    Frank Langfitt

    And what did you do?

    Geoff Weller

    I left. Because, you know, I was in his home, so to speak– his territory, his plant.

    Frank Langfitt

    Now, whatever happened to that plant manager who asked you to leave?

    Geoff Weller

    That plant manager eventually retired.

    Frank Langfitt

    This may sound like a naive question, but why didn’t the CEO pick up the phone and say, you’re fired?

    Geoff Weller

    Well, it’s a big company, and I’m not sure that– it doesn’t work that way.

    Frank Langfitt

    Lots of people in GM still didn’t see the need to change. By the late 1990s, the company was posting huge profits selling trucks and SUVs, which made the loss in market share seem less urgent. To make real progress, managers had to leave the United States. One overhauled GM Germany. Mark Hogan took over GM Brazil in 1994 to enact NUMMI principles there. In Brazil, he had a big unionized workforce, but he could avoid GM’s bureaucracy, its supplier network, and the United Auto Workers.

    Frank Langfitt

    How long did it take you to implement the lessons of NUMMI in Brazil?

    Mark Hogan

    It took us about 18 to 24 months, which at the time I was quite impatient about. I mean, I wanted it faster.

    Frank Langfitt

    And what did that mean for the bottom line for GM?

    Mark Hogan

    Well, in that time frame, particularly ’94 though ’97, GM Brazil was one of the most profitable entities within GM.

    Frank Langfitt

    But in America, everyone I talked to said it took about a decade and a half after NUMMI for change to even begin to take hold at GM. By the year 2000, GM finally started to see a generational transformation. Jeffrey Liker says, so many managers had come through NUMMI for training, for a day, or a week, or a year.

    Jeffrey Liker

    Over time, you start to get 10 people, 20 people, 100 people, 300 people, and you now have a critical mass of people in GM who’ve all been in NUMMI, they’ve lived it. Now they’re managing people and teaching them what they learned, and it snowballs, and suddenly the world is different in GM, and nobody can even tell you exactly why.

    Frank Langfitt

    By the early 2000s, GM had developed a production model with the UAW based on Japanese principles that would go into all of its plants. It was called the global manufacturing system. And although GM quality still lags behind the imports, it’s improved a lot. Again, Jeffrey Liker.

    Jeffrey Liker

    If you look carefully at the quality of a GM product, and you look with a fine tooth comb, with a magnifying glass, you’re going to see a level of quality that you didn’t see 15 years ago.

    Frank Langfitt

    You want to show me for a sec, do you mind? There’s one right here.

    I did my interview with Jeffrey Liker at this year’s Detroit Auto Show. And we walked over to the GM exhibit, to the Cadillac SRX, which is a small SUV. Jeffrey pointed to the gap between the door and the car frame, which is supposed to be uniform.

    Jeffrey Liker

    And if we look down here, it looks really good. The gap is about the same between the front and the back door, the surface is very smooth and very uniform.

    Frank Langfitt

    And 15 years ago, what would that have looked like?

    Jeffrey Liker

    You would see, maybe at the top, it would be more narrow than at the bottom. If you look inside the car and you open the glove box, it falls very gradually down, the way it’s supposed to. You close it– I barely have to touch it and it closes tightly.

    Frank Langfitt

    Precision in all these details makes for a better looking, more reliable car, where things work like they’re supposed to. But this improvement didn’t come soon enough. Some cars and some plants improved less quickly than others. And while GM was getting better, so were its competitors, leaving it still near the back of the pack.

    James Womack

    Well, one of the ironies of GM was that at the moment it went bankrupt, it was probably a better company than it had ever been.

    Frank Langfitt

    That’s James Womack, co-author of a seminal book comparing the Toyota and GM production systems, The Machine that Changed the World.

    James Womack

    In the factories, they had really dramatically closed the productivity gap that they had had for many, many years. And on the new products, they have much better quality. So that the company that failed was actually doing better than it had ever done. But it was too late, and that’s really sort of hard to forgive– that if you take 30 years to figure it out, chances are you’re going to get run over. And they got run over.

    Frank Langfitt

    In the end, what did them in was the 2008 recession. It destroyed the car market, and next year, General Motors became the largest industrial bankruptcy in US history. Its bailout cost taxpayers more than $50 billion. I asked Mark Hogan, the NUMMI commando who went on to run GM’s small car division in North America, if GM had adopted NUMMI earlier, could it have really changed all that?

    Mark Hogan

    Definitely. I think if General Motors had moved in the late ’80s to implement this system across the board, it may very well have saved GM from going into bankruptcy.

    Frank Langfitt

    Explain that.

    Mark Hogan

    Well, I just think the productivity and the quality changes that come with that would have been so profound that this ever increasing loss of market share would have been stopped.

    Bruce Lee

    Well, I think they’d have been building a higher quality product.

    Frank Langfitt

    Again, the UAW’s Bruce Lee.

    Bruce Lee

    You know, they sold junk for a while. Just any kind of piece of crap they could roll out there, they did. And they paid a tremendous price for it, and even when they turned the corner in quality, people didn’t trust them. They’d say, well, gee, they’re building a good car now, why aren’t they buying them? Because they don’t trust them.

    But had they adopted and embraced the team concept in an honest way– we’re going to do this– I think it might have dramatically changed what happened in the American auto industry. There’s no question in my mind.

    Frank Langfitt

    Of course, quality and reliability weren’t the only problems that brought GM down. Executives made other big mistakes. Over the years, General Motors negotiated contracts with the UAW with such generous health care coverage that by 2007, it amounted to more than $1,600 for each vehicle GM produced in North America.

    And initially, some GM executives dismissed hybrid cars, like the Prius, as a publicity stunt. Instead, they bet the company on SUVs and trucks, only to see sales crash when gas hit four bucks a gallon.

    One odd twist to this story– over the last decade, as GM became more like Toyota, Toyota became a little bit like GM. In 2008, they took over the title from GM of the world’s largest car maker. But Toyota executives now say the company did this by making one of GM’s old mistakes– stressing quantity over quality.

    Akio Toyoda is the company’s CEO. He’s the grandson of the founder, and he cut his teeth at NUMMI. In a congressional hearing last month about Toyota’s sudden acceleration problem, he said the company’s crucial mistake was growing too fast.

    Akio Toyoda

    We pursued growth over the speed at which we are able to develop our people and our organization. And I am deeply sorry for any accident that Toyota drivers have experienced.

    Frank Langfitt

    It was 15 years before GM took the lessons of NUMMI seriously, and they spent the next 10 years slowly implementing what it learned. And all the time, the NUMMI plant kept pumping out vehicles– 6,000 a week on average, two shifts a day. Toyota got what it wanted out of the deal. A year after starting NUMMI, it began opening other factories around the US using what it had learned in Fremont.

    GM and Toyota continued to run NUMMI together, until 2009 when GM went bankrupt and pulled out, leaving Toyota to run the plant alone. Now Toyota has decided to pull out of the plant. It’s their only unionized plant in the United States. Next Thursday, NUMMI will produce its very last car, a Corolla. 4,500 people will lose their jobs. This is the first factory Toyota has shut down since it was founded 73 years ago.

    John Shook

    Toyota is not perfect. GM is not perfect. But I think anyone who touched NUMMI will never forget it.

    Frank Langfitt

    One last time, that’s John Shook, the first American Toyota hired for NUMMI.

    John Shook

    It does represent something that was special at a point in time. It was a laboratory. My learning curve, it wasn’t just a curve, it was a 90 degree right angle. I loved every minute of it. And almost every one, I think you’ll talk to, who worked on NUMMI will say the same thing.

    Rick Madrid

    I’m so fortunate that I ended my career in the auto industry at NUMMI.

    Frank Langfitt

    Rick Madrid retired from the assembly line in 1992.

    Rick Madrid

    I just hate to see the plant close– oh, that just hurts me. End of an era. It changed my life from being depressed, bored– and like my son said, it changed my attitude. It changed me all for the better. I really hate to see it go.

    Billy Haggerty

    I look at cars, and I see a lot of the cars that we built.

    Frank Langfitt

    That’s Billy Haggerty, who ended up putting in 18 years at NUMMI without a vacation day. He says just the other day he saw one.

    Billy Haggerty

    I just seen a– what was it– ’86, ’87 Corolla, pulled in right over around this corner here. I was heading for the bank, and I just looked at it, said, boy, that one’s old. I looked down, it was a Corolla. I know we built it, right there. It’s still running. It’s still kicking. It feels good.

    Frank Langfitt

    This is also NUMMI’s legacy. In the end, it’s not just a symbol for so many things that went wrong with GM. It’s also a really good car plant– one that turned out nearly 8 million high quality cars and trucks.

    Ira Glass

    Frank Langfitt is NPR’s automotive correspondent.

    Frank Langfitt’s story about NUMMI was produced by me and Brian Reed. NPR’s Uri Berliner helped us edit it. Our show today was produced by Lisa Pollak, with Alex Blumberg, Jane Feltes, Sarah Koenig, Robyn Semien, Alissa Shipp, and Nancy Updike. Our senior producer is Julie Snyder. Old Japanese TV footage in today’s show comes from NHK in Tokyo.

    [ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS]

    Our website, thisamericanlife.org, where our online store is now back up in operation, and where you can find the new update of our iPhone app. This American Life is distributed by Public Radio International. Support for This American Life comes from Kohler. WBEZ management oversight for our program by our boss, Mr. Torey Malatia. I overheard him in the hallway telling someone how surprised he was at the quality of our shows this year.

    Bruce Lee

    Because that was not a young workforce. And, you know, they were old, they were fat.

    Ira Glass

    I’m Ira Glass, back next week with more stories of This American Life.

    © 2010 This American Life

    #56608
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Is Jeff Fisher’s extension with the Rams still on the table?

    Alden Gonzalez

    http://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/31478/is-jeff-fishers-extension-with-the-rams-still-on-the-table

    It seems like forever since the Los Angeles Rams played an actual football game. But they’re back in a normal practice week now, getting set to host Carolina on Sunday for what will be their first true home game in nearly a month. Late Tuesday afternoon, they will hold their first official practice in six days. Before that, I answered some of your lingering questions, touching on the three essential topics for this team: Jared Goff versus Case Keenum, Jeff Fisher’s extension and Todd Gurley’s production.

    @HoldenCantor
    @Alden_Gonzalez any chance fisher is trying to hide that Goff will actually be the starter vs the panthers?

    Sure, there is always that chance. But I wouldn’t bet on it. Goff took first-team reps last week because of the bye, then said he feels “tremendously more comfortable than I’ve ever felt” and added that he is “confident that if my number’s called, I’ll be ready to go.” But Fisher has repeatedly said he is sticking with Keenum, who has the NFL’s lowest Total QBR and just threw four interceptions in the Rams’ third straight loss on Oct. 23. There can really only be two reasons for this …

    There is something Goff simply isn’t showing the Rams, and because it’s so difficult to judge a quarterback based on limited scout-team reps, you’d have to think it largely stems from the classroom. One thing Keenum does have is a good feel for the way this offense operates. But Fisher recently stated that the Rams wouldn’t simplify the offense to accommodate Goff, because Goff has “that good of a feel for what we’re doing.” So there’s that.

    Fisher is hell-bent on sticking to his plan heading into the season, which seemingly called for Goff to use his entire rookie year to learn as a backup. Goff entered the NFL having not called a play from the huddle or taken a snap from under center. Also, he was 22 years and 18 days old as of Tuesday morning. Carson Wentz (23 years and 307 days old), Dak Prescott (23 years and 95 days) and Cody Kessler (23 years and 174 days) are all older.

    If a change at quarterback is going to occur, this is the time to do it, because it’s a bye week and because three of the Rams’ next four opponents — the Panthers, Jets and Saints — rank within the bottom four in passing yards allowed per game. If Fisher doesn’t change his mind this week, it probably means Goff won’t start unless the Rams completely fall out of it in the final weeks.

    Steven Wise @StevenWise89
    @Alden_Gonzalez What’s holding up Jeff Fisher’s long rumored contract extension?

    Eight NFL weeks have passed, and still there has been no announcement on an extension for Fisher (or general manager Les Snead, for that matter). It’s odd. Talks were reported dating back to February, parameters were reportedly in place as recently as late September. But now it’s November, and Fisher still has lame-duck status. Timing and public perception appear to be a major reason for that. The Rams are in a new market, with a fan base that they have to win over, and announcing an extension for Fisher would not have gone over well following the season-opening 28-0 drubbing or the three straight losses that spilled into the bye week.

    Fisher’s extension might be on hold until the end of the season, and by that point, who knows which direction the Rams’ brass will go. Fisher and Snead have earned respect from the higher-ups for the way they turned the franchise around following a five-year stretch in which it compiled 15 wins from 2007-11. Stan Kroenke is said to believe his team is headed in the right direction because of the work Fisher and Snead have done since arriving in 2012. But the Rams have not finished above .500 since 2003 and don’t seem poised to do so this season, either. Their head coaching position would be a highly coveted one if they leave it open after the season.

    Andrew Edling @AEDLING
    @Alden_Gonzalez when/how will the rams make the corrections needed to unleash Gurley’s potential

    I’m not sure how much more they can do. This is far more a case of opposing teams not respecting the Rams’ passing attack and the offensive line not doing a good enough job up front. Perhaps some of the blame also lies with Gurley, who isn’t necessarily the most patient of runners. From a play-calling standpoint, the Rams have run the Wildcat with Gurley twice — already one more than all of last season — and have lined him up on the outside as a receiver on several occasions. In seven games, Gurley has the same amount of receptions (21) that he had in 13 as a rookie last season.

    Now, I would like to see the Rams set up more screen passes for Gurley, who has caught only four of those. And it would be nice to see him have more runs where he is bouncing it to the outside as opposed to fighting between the tackles. But it’s hard to do that when you’re averaging 1.34 yards before first contact, the lowest rate in the NFL. Gurley has rushed for only 403 yards (ranked 21st) despite getting 134 carries (eighth-most). He averaged a much-improved (but still pedestrian) 3.97 yards per carry over his past two games, but only compiled 29 attempts in that span.

    For some reason, the Rams mostly went away from Gurley in the second half of those games, even though the score remained close.

    They have to stay committed to the running game.

    #56458
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    who knows. he might be ready now. he definitely wasn’t ready week 1. but he might be ready now.

    i also think this is a case of his skill set being so good that they were willing to be patient even though wentz was the more productive ready qb or maybe they underestimated the fact that he came from a pro style offense.

    and maybe this is also just a case of fisher’s philosophy being that he is going to bring them along slowly. i think he has a history of doing that in general.

    in any case… start him already…

    hehe.

    #55886
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    link:http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/wife-of-job-bible

    Most Scientific Findings Are Wrong or Useless
    “Science isn’t self-correcting, it’s self-destructing.”

    Ronald Bailey | August 26, 2016

    “Science, the pride of modernity, our one source of objective knowledge, is in deep trouble.” So begins “Saving Science,” an incisive and deeply disturbing essay by Daniel Sarewitz at The New Atlantis. As evidence, Sarewitz, a professor at Arizona State University’s School for Future Innovation and Society, points to reams of mistaken or simply useless research findings that have been generated over the past decades.
    Sarewitz cites several examples of bad science that I reported in my February article “Broken Science.” These include a major biotech company’s finding in 2012 that only six out of 53 landmark published preclinical cancer studies could be replicated. Researchers at a leading pharmaceutical company reported that they could not replicate 43 of the 67 published preclinical studies that the company had been relying on to develop cancer and cardiovascular treatments and diagnostics. In 2015, only about a third of 100 psychological studies published in three leading psychology journals could be adequately replicated.

    A 2015 editorial in The Lancet observed that “much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.” A 2015 British Academy of Medical Sciences report suggested that the false discovery rate in some areas of biomedicine could be as high as 69 percent. In an email exchange with me, the Stanford biostatistician John Ioannidis estimated that the non-replication rates in biomedical observational and preclinical studies could be as high as 90 percent.

    Sarewitz also notes that 1,000 peer-reviewed and published breast cancer research studies turned out to be using a skin cancer cell line instead. Furthermore, when amyotrophic lateral sclerosis researchers tested more than 100 potential drugs reported to slow disease progression in mouse models, none were found to be beneficial when tested on the same mouse strains. A 2016 article suggested that fMRI brain imaging studies suffered from a 70 percent false positive rate. Sarewitz also notes that decades of nutritional dogma about the alleged health dangers of salt, fats, and red meat appears to be wrong.

    And then there is the huge problem of epidemiology, which manufactures false positives by the hundreds of thousands. In the last decade of the 20th century, some 80,000 observational studies were published, but the numbers more than tripled to nearly 264,000 between 2001 and 2011. S. Stanley Young of the U.S. National Institute of Statistical Sciences has estimated that only 5 to 10 percent of those observational studies can be replicated. “Within a culture that pressures scientists to produce rather than discover, the outcome is a biased and impoverished science in which most published results are either unconfirmed genuine discoveries or unchallenged fallacies,” four British neuroscientists bleakly concluded in a 2014 editorial for the journal AIMS Neuroscience.

    Some alarmed researchers refer to this situation as the “reproducibility crisis,” but Sarewitz convincingly argues that they are not getting to the real source of the rot. The problem starts with the notion, propounded in the MIT technologist Vannevar Bush’s famous 1945 report Science: The Endless Frontier, that scientific progress “results from the free play of free intellects, working on subjects of their own choice, in the manner dictated by their curiosity for exploration of the unknown.” Sarewitz calls this a “beautiful lie.”

    Why it is a lie? Because it makes “it easy to believe that scientific imagination gives birth to technological progress, when in reality technology sets the agenda for science, guiding it in its most productive directions and providing continual tests of its validity, progress, and value.” He adds, “Technology keeps science honest.” Basically, research detached from trying to solve well-defined problems spins off self-validating, career-enhancing publications like those breast cancer studies that actually were using skin cancer cells. Yet no patients were cured of breast cancer. The “truth test” of technology is the most certain way to tell if the knowledge allegedly being generated by research is valid. “The scientific phenomena must be real or the technologies would not work,” Sarewitz explains.

    Sarewitz points out that the military-industrial complex—the very force from which Vannevar Bush was eager to escape—generated the targeted scientific results that led to many of the technologies that have made the modern world possible, including digital computers, jet aircraft, cell phones, the internet, lasers, satellites, GPS, digital imagery, and nuclear and solar power. He’s not suggesting that the Department of Defense should be in charge of scientific research. He’s arguing that research should be aimed more directly at solving specific problems, as opposed to a system where researchers torture some cells and lab mice and then publish a dubious paper. An example of the kind of targeted scientific work he favors is the National Breast Cancer Coalition’s Artemis project, whose goal is to develop an effective breast cancer vaccine by 2020.

    “Academic science, especially, has become an onanistic enterprise worthy of Swift or Kafka,” Sarewitz declares. He wants end-user constituencies—patient advocacy groups, environmental organizations, military planners—outside of academia to have a much bigger say in setting the goals for publicly funded research. “The questions you ask are likely to be very different if your end goal is to solve a concrete problem, rather than only to advance understanding,” he argues. “That’s why the symbiosis between science and technology is so powerful: the technology provides focus and discipline for the science.”

    And there’s a bigger problem. In his 1972 essay “Science and Trans-Science,” the physicist Alvin Weinberg noted that science is increasingly being asked to address such issues as the deleterious side effects of new technologies, or how to deal with social problems such as crime and poverty. These are questions that “though they are, epistemologically speaking, questions of fact and can be stated in the language of science, they are unanswerable by science; they transcend science.” Such trans-scientific questions inevitably involve values, assumptions, and ideology. Consequently, attempting to answer trans-scientific questions, Weinberg wrote, “inevitably weaves back and forth across the boundary between what is known and what is not known and knowable.”

    “The great thing about trans-science is that you can keep on doing research,” Sarewitz observes, “You can…create the sense that we’re gaining knowledge…without getting any closer to a final or useful answer.” Some contemporary trans-scientific questions: “Are biotech crops necessary to feed the world?” “Does exposure to synthetic chemicals deform penises?” “Do open markets benefit all countries?” “What will the costs of man-made global warming be in a century?” “What can be done about rising obesity rates?” “Does standardized testing improve educational outcomes?” All of these depend on debatable assumptions or are subject to confounders that make it impossible to be sure that the correlations uncovered are actually causal.

    Consider climate change. “The vaunted scientific consensus around climate change,” notes Sarewitz, “applies only to a narrow claim about the discernible human impact on global warming. The minute you get into questions about the rate and severity of future impacts, or the costs of and best pathways for addressing them, no semblance of consensus among experts remains.” Nevertheless, climate “models spew out endless streams of trans-scientific facts that allow for claims and counterclaims, all apparently sanctioned by science, about how urgent the problem is and what needs to be done.”

    Vast numbers of papers have been published attempting to address these trans-scientific questions, Sarewitz observes. They provide anyone engaged in these debates with overabundant supplies of “peer-reviewed and thus culturally validated truths that can be selected and assembled in whatever ways are necessary to support the position and policy solution of your choice.” It’s confirmation bias all the way down.

    The advent of big data also worries Sarewitz. Dredging massive new datasets generated by an already badly flawed research enterprise will produce huge numbers of meaningless correlations. Since the integrity of the output is dependent on the integrity of input, big data science risks generating a flood of instances of garbage in, garbage out, or GIGO. Sarewitz warns, “The scientific community and its supporters are now busily creating the infrastructure and the expectations that can make unreliability, knowledge chaos, and multiple conflicting truths the essence of science’s legacy.”

    Ultimately, science can be rescued if researchers can be directed more toward solving real world problems rather than pursuing the beautiful lie. Sarewitz argues that in the future, the most valuable scientific institutions will be those that are held accountable and give scientists incentives to solve urgent concrete problems. The goal of such science will be to produce new useful technologies, not new useless studies. In the meantime, Sarewitz has made a strong case that contemporary “science isn’t self-correcting, it’s self-destructing

    #55680
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – October 20, 2016

    (Opening statement)

    “Good Thursday practice session. I was really pleased with the energy. Meetings started at a decent hour this morning and we got a lot done. They’re flying around. What’s interesting is as the week goes on, as coaches we have more opportunity to study the opponent and I’m becoming more and more impressed with our upcoming opponent, which is not necessarily a good thing for us. They’re playing really good on defense. Their secondary’s playing really well together. They’re flying around and not giving up a lot of points. We’re going to have to be on par, offensively. Then defensively, (Giants QB) Eli (Manning) is Eli, he can make it happen. We’ve got our work cut out. We’ve got some match up concerns going in – the obvious ones are our secondary and our young corners against (Giants WR) Odell (Beckham Jr.). You go back and look at everybody that’s played them, they’re playing close attention to where he is and they’re giving them help. So, we’re going to have to do the same. But great respect for their skilled players on offense. As we move further into the week, it just becomes more apparent that it’s going to be a great game. It’s going to be a great ball game.”

    (On adjusting to the eight hour time difference)

    “The guys are fine right now. We talked to them in advance and we told them today is the day you’re going to feel better. When you tell them you feel better, then they feel better. That’s kind of our approach. But they had a great day today. We need to finish up tomorrow with a good practice and then excited about going over to the stadium and doing the walk-thru on Saturday.”

    (On what he’s seen with Giants CB Janoris Jenkins on film)

    “I mentioned in the conference call yesterday, I’ve got great respect for some of the top corners in the league, but it would be hard-pressed to find someone playing better than he is right now. He’s playing within the scheme. He’s challenging receivers, not within the scheme. I’m talking about, if he’s left or right and he’s playing their zone stuff and their matchup stuff, he does a great job. They’re also, if need be, matching him up on the best guy and he’s winning. He’s got a lot of PBU’s, which is pass breakups and he’s tackling well, he’s running well. It looks like he’s in great shape.”

    (On DE Robert him injury status)

    “He was full practice today.”

    (On whether he expects him to play)

    “I expect and am hoping. But full practice today is encouraging.”

    (On what happens to the defense when he’s not available on game day)

    “The attention goes to (DT) Aaron (Donald). I guess that’s most obviously stated. It goes right to Aaron. They feel like they can win the one-on-ones outside. Now we’ve won outside without him – (DE) Will’s (Hayes) won outside, (DE) Eugene’s (Sims) won outside, and the other guys have won as well. But basically, when he is on the edge, the fire power on the edge is going to require help, so that takes one more person offensively out of the routes of distribution.”

    (On what he thinks is the best way to handle a player like Giants WR Odell Beckham Jr. – a player who displays so much passion that it may sometimes boil over)

    “I think they did a good job up there. He’s an emotional player, that’s why he’s so talented. Every play is important to him. He blocks, he’s into the offense and everything. He had his issues, if you watched a couple games, especially the Green Bay game, he settled down completely. He was helping opponents up off the ground, slapping them on the rear end, you know that kind of thing. I think he’s learned. He’s got a chance to go down as one of the all-time bests. He’s really, really special. We have respect for him but we’re going to have to cover him. We’re going to have to tackle him. That’s just what we do.”

    (On why he likes Odell Beckham Jr. can become one of the best wide receivers to play the game)

    “If he stays healthy over the next five or seven years, he takes a slant and goes 70 yards, just like he did right at the end of the game. There’s not a whole lot of guys right now playing the game, rather than (Falcons WR) Julio (Jones), and some guys that can do that. He can make all the catches and runs all the routes, and the run-after-catch stuff is pretty impressive.”

    (On if he believes Beckham is a different player from two seasons ago, from a mental standpoint and with specific regards to a scuffle involving him and Rams players last time the teams played)

    “That was his rookie year and I think he’s learned from it. We’re not anticipating anything this week. We’re just going to line up and play. But, something got out of hand there, with respect to both teams. We’re not dwelling on that, we’re not showing that. We’re just dwelling on what they’re doing offensively.”

    (On if he’s spoken to his defensive backs about controlling their temper against Beckham)

    “What you do is, and it’s a weekly discussion, is just don’t hurt our football team. Regardless of what happens out there, regardless of what is said, or regardless of the reaction out of an opponent, don’t put yourself in a position to hurt the football team. Now, again, I think Odell learned last week when a big touchdown play that shift the game, and he let loose of his emotions, took his helmet off, and now they’re kicking off from the 20-yard line. Those things are hard. I think the whole league needs to learn from that. Give yourself a chance to win. That could’ve cost them a victory last week. So, we don’t want to put ourselves in a position to where those kinds of things happen to us.”

    (On if he ever engaged emotional players while he was a defensive back)

    “I wasn’t very good. I was just trying to survive (laughs). There’s a lot of stuff that goes on out on the field, that you guys don’t know that’s said. Sometimes the verbal confrontations – they end up in physical confrontations, and you don’t want that to happen. We went out and just tried to win the game.”

    (On what stood out to him about the Giants on tape)

    “All three phases. Their special teams is just very well coached. I’ve got great respect for Mike Solari, their offensive line coach. He’s done a good job. They’re going to continue to improve in their run game, offensively. The passing game is up to Eli (Manning). Eli knows what is going on. He puts them in the right situations all the time. I guess most importantly, defensively, it’s a stacked defense. It’s a secondary that’s loaded. (S) Landon (Collins) is playing really, really well right now, in addition to Janoris (Jenkins). (CB Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie) Rodgers is playing well. They have depth, linebackers are running, defensive line is stout. They’ve got what you need to win in the NFC East.”

    (On if he foresees a big game out of RB Todd Gurley)

    “Yeah, it’s coming. There’s going to be that busted open run. Whether if the ball is handed off to him, or not, or whether it’s thrown to him. He’s in great shape right now. He feels good, he’s patient, and that’s the important thing. He’s not pressing. Patience, it’s a valuable asset as a running back. His time is coming.”

    (On if he thinks DT Aaron Donald can go down as one of the all-time greats and something about Donald that doesn’t show up in the box score)

    “I think, as coaches, you have to be careful about praising your own players. I may step out of the box here – he’s really good, he’s really good. And he’s been there week after week. He’s very, very disruptive. His sack numbers, as we said, they’re not there, but the pressures and the hits and the disruption and the tackles for losses are all there. He’s special.”

    (On if he’s ever had a player as strong as Donald in the interior)

    “I’ve had some good ones. I’ve been around some good ones. When I was around the defensive line in Philadelphia with Jerome Brown inside, Reggie White, we put him inside – they were good ones. He’s just getting started, let me just say that. He’s young in his career and he’s just getting started, and I think his production over the last couple of years speaks for itself.”

    (On how far in advance he needed to prepare for the London game and how different it is)

    “If I hear your question correctly, I didn’t involve the coaching staff and the players with it. But as a head coach, you work with our operations department, you have to plan well in advanced. We had people here at this facility and at the stadium back in March and April. But as far as scheduling is concerned, I personally did that over the last, probably, a month beforehand. It’s important, the scheduling, the little things are important. You have to put the players first and you have to put yourself in the eyes of the player, with respect to every minute of the day. It’s working out, it’s working out good. Again, the time and effort that everybody put in, outside of the coaching staff, with respect to the operations and everything, it’s worked out. So the players are in good shape right now.”

    (On if hype associated with the time zone difference and logistics is justified and if it’s a major shift for the players)

    “It’s different. I think it’s unique for our standpoint because we went Pacific Coast Time to Eastern Time and then we came here. So, it was a huge shift. So it’s all about what you do before you adjust to Eastern Time with the Detroit game and then what we do here. There’s a lot involved and people have taken different approaches, as well. Sometimes teams just come in on Fridays and they pound on player’s doors and say, ‘Wake up,’ and let’s go play. Our first experience here, we thought we were doing the right things and after the first series on offense, things were really good – we had a four or five or six-play drive against New England and thought ‘Alright, they came here Friday, we got here Monday, everything’s good,’ and we lose (45-7). But I think to give the players the best chance to be successful, three things are key – and that’s rest, recuperation, recovery and then, of course, adjusting to the time change.”

    (On what he thinks will be important to see from the team on Sunday to get the win heading into the bye week)

    “The win is the ultimate thing. We’ve shown improvement over the last couple of weeks offensively, we’ve not played to our standards on defense. We’re kind of trading back-and-forth on special teams. We need all three phases, and we need big plays. For all intents and purposes, if you compare the two teams, I think you’re, in all likelihood, it’s going to come down to the end, a play at the end.”

    (On if he would agree with the players who say they’re going into the game with a chip on their shoulder)

    “Yeah, they’re disappointed. From our perspective, a coaching perspective and the player’s perspective, we’ve let two slip that we potentially could have won. They feel like this one’s really important. I don’t know if the chip on the shoulder is the thing, but they’re doing all the extra little things that they need to do – and they’ve done that all year, it doesn’t matter.”

    #55525

    In reply to: the Detroit INT

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    That was good.

    Case had such a good game — until it counted, in the clutch.

    They were gonna have to complete a medium pass at some point, but
    I woulda preferred he hit the open RB on that play, and then spike the ball.
    They didnt need a TD. They had plenty of time to get in legatron’s range.

    I just think they got a tad impatient.

    w
    v

    #55308
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Robert Anton Wilson had a very low opinion of Carl Sagan.

    Just saying…

    Why?

    Ted Turner is a bit of a dolt, isn’t he?

    I got the impression that as Sagan talked Turner was singing the “Golden Grahams” tune in his head ala Homer Simpson.

    ——————

    R.A.Wilson was a quirky, ornery guy. He wrote quirky books attacking fundamentalist-religions, but he also wrote a book attacking ‘scientific fundamentalism’ (‘The New Inquisition”)

    He was very open to….oh, i think you like to call it “wooo” 🙂

    He thot of Sagan as a scientific fundamentalist. (I dont quite see Sagan that way myself, btw)

    R.A.Wilson was more of a Buckminster Fuller kinda sciency-guy, than a Carl Sagan kinda sciency-guy.

    In a nutshell, Wilson kinda sorta evaluated science-experts on a spectrum of how much ‘woo’ they were open to.

    w
    v
    http://rawilson.com/trigger3.html
    “….Sagan’s hilarious theory of “nuclear winter.”* Briefly, Sagan’s theory holds that nuclear war could result, not just in the horrors we all know, but in a freeze that would probably abolish all life on this planet. (He published this notion in Parade, where his mass audience could see it and gasp.) His refusal to accept valid criticisms of this sci-fi story led to the following summary in Science, official journal of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “News and Comments” section, Jan 16, 1987:

    Sagan’s refusal to acknowledge merit in the NCAR [National Center for Atmospheric Research]’s analysis — known as “nuclear autumn” — sends some people up the wall. One wall-climber is George Rathjens, professor of political science at M.I.T….”(Sagan’s) claim that the original nuclear winter model is unimpeached [he says]…is the greatest fraud we’ve seen in a long time”….Russell Seiz, a fellow at the Harvard Center for International Affairs…gibes at [Sagan and his co-authors] for mixing physics and advertising.

    Most scientists I have spoken to about Sagan share this dim view of his use of publicity to represent his pet notions as Scientific Truth even when — or especially when — a large segment of the scientific community has severe doubts about these notions.

    (Similarly, in Brocca’s Brain, Sagan rejects data on so-called “out of body experiences” among near-dead patients because — he says — nobody in that state has reported anything they couldn’t have heard while unconscious. But the literature of OOBE has hundreds of cases of such reports, including numerous incidents in which the subjects reported things in rooms far away from the operating room. Once again, we can only wonder if Sagan habitually lies through his teeth or just doesn’t read any of the literature on the subjects upon which he claims Expertese.)

    But returning to Dr. Velikovsky, and Sagan’s crusade against his ideas: … see link”

    #55121

    In reply to: Fisher on Goff

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Notes: Jared Goff remaining patient, as are team’s coaches

    RICH HAMMOND / STAFF WRITER

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/goff-731988-rams-every.html

    THOUSAND OAKS – Jared Goff stands – apparently with patience – and waits to enter a regular-season game, even as his quarterback contemporaries have formed a conga line into their respective huddles.

    Goff, the Rams’ No. 1 overall pick in this year’s draft, has yet to take a snap. Goff was inactive for the season opener and has been the backup for the past four games. Rams coaches have taken a tortoise-slow attitude with Goff’s development but have expressed nothing but satisfaction with the rookie.

    Meanwhile, around the league, rookie quarterbacks are playing. Philadelphia’s Carson Wentz, taken second overall, has started four games. Denver’s Paxton Lynch, taken at No. 26, made his first start last week. Third-round picks Jacoby Brissett (New England) and Cody Kessler (Cleveland) have started.

    Among the first six quarterbacks selected last April, only Goff and second-round pick Christian Hackenberg (New York Jets) have yet to take a regular-season snap. Is Goff feeling any frustration?

    “Every situation is different,” Goff said after Wednesday’s practice at Cal Lutheran. “All of these guys who are doing well right now, I’m happy for them. Most of them I’m good friends with, and they’ve done a good job and I’m very happy for them.”

    The Rams’ comfort level with Goff seems to be rising. After the preseason, Coach Jeff Fisher indicated Goff wasn’t ready for an NFL game, thus the inactive status for the opener. This week, Fisher said it was possible Goff would get into a game if the Rams were leading or trailing by a large margin.

    Goff, who turns 22 on Friday, is younger than all five of the rookie quarterbacks who have played this season – Dallas’ Dak Prescott, a fourth-round pick, has started all five games – and Rams coaches said they’re pleased with Goff’s development, and not only as their scout-team quarterback in practices.

    “A lot of time, you understand how a person is learning by the questions he’s asking,” offensive coordinator Rob Boras said. “He’s not asking rookie questions anymore. He’s starting to ask more advanced, the (college-level) 301- or 401-type questions. So for me, it starts there.”

    Goff was asked if he thought his understanding of the game has progressed beyond rookie status.

    “I hope so,” Goff said. “I think I’ve progressed ever since I got here, and I don’t think I’ve ever plateaued or gone backward. I think I’ve gotten better every time, every week, every day. I feel good. I just feel like every day and every week has gotten more and more natural and more like second nature.”

    #55071
    bnw
    Blocked

    Information is good. However if it is used in a campaign to deny over the counter botanical supplements to the consumer then that is bad.

    No one is trying to deny anyone their woo. The article is just saying caution should be used when taking those supplements because it appears they can interfere with real medicines leading to poor outcomes for the patient.

    But that is how the effort to deny begins. Look at Europe.

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by bnw.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    #55005
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Information is good. However if it is used in a campaign to deny over the counter botanical supplements to the consumer then that is bad.

    No one is trying to deny anyone their woo. The article is just saying caution should be used when taking those supplements because it appears they can interfere with real medicines leading to poor outcomes for the patient.

    #54414
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ——————-
    http://forums.azcardinals.com/forumdisplay.php?23-Cardinals-Football
    ————–

    Heard a clip on the radio of Tyrann Mathieu saying “We just haven’t found our motivation yet.” What kind of silly statement is that? Any of us telling our boss that when we stink up the place would probably be shown the door and told not to let it hit us on the way out. Ladybird04

    Defensed laid a big fat stinky one.. The Rams were converting on 3rd downs all day..
    —-
    I am so glad Jeff Fisher is our opposing coach
    I couldnt ask for more ! I am so glad Jeff Fisher is our opposing coach
    I couldnt ask for more !
    ===
    Unbelievable. Making Keenum look like Russell Wilson
    —-
    BETCHER… stop rushing just 4. Keenum making Cards looks stupid
    —-
    Rams dirty but still. This is sad
    —-
    Only the Rams high five a player for a flag.

    O line getting abused by 4 rushers
    —-
    Rams games are QB killers …
    —-
    I think Palmer is regressing in front of our eyes. Every Week he is going down hill.

    Betch ‘s ability to coordinate a superbowl champ defense seiously in question. Rams finding openings, short, intermediate…
    —-
    Bettcher is the worst DC ever…..

    Thanks to LA shooting themselves in the foot and keeping us in this game, just wow…
    —-
    we suck
    —-


    Our kick return is an abortion
    —-
    Wow.. never would have thought the cardinals would be 1-3 or in last place in the NFC West a 1/4 way threw the season..
    Screw the Rams.. they’re dirty and purposely head hunt the Cardinals we lose how many player personal every season we play them..
    —-
    Now carson…I hate the rams
    —-
    Who are the Arizona Cardinals? No identity on offense and defense. SB asperiations my ***

    Nice fair catch Peterson. Idiot
    —–

    Play calling is the problem…… Team is not reacting well to this play calling !!! When you call the wrong plays and allow the opposing defense to gain confidence. Your offence loses faith. And so goes for your defense as well. !!!

    How, just how did BA and Keim make this team just ugly, just butt ugly? The stars play like ****, guys in a contract year don’t give a ****, our starters on the oline and dline visibly don’t want to do their jobs. This team or lack of a team is just phatetic.
    —-
    The luster is gone. The league has caught up to Bruce. It took a long time but it has happened
    —-
    1. Bettcher is being exposed. No creativity on the defensive side with the playmakers we have. I don’t think anyone respects him which is why there are so many issues on that side. Maybe there was something to what Woodley said about him last year. Put Badger near the LOS. He’s the one Cardinals defensive player that the opposing offense accounts for. Bettcher has been horrible with garbage game plans all year vs. bum QBs.

    2. BAs refusal to run the ******** football is baffling, also no flexibility in the routes. Maybe it’s a reason that he just got a head coaching job.

    3. Other than Fitz, our WRs run poor routes which is why they can’t get separation.

    4. Team can’t find the switch because it’s been in country club mode all off season. The experts noticed it in the pre-season!!

    5. I think it’s some bad vibes in the locker room with the players that got paid vs. the one’s trying to get paid. Something about the leadership in that locker room isn’t right. Still soft on both sides of the ball.

    6. SPECIAL TEAMS IS HORRIBLE. WE’VE BEEN AT THE BOTTOM OF THE LEAGUE SINCE BA HAS BEEN HERE!! His Buddy Amos Jones needs to go! Also, it looks like we have a bunch of players that have no interest in playing on ST or are our reserves just that bad. No one seems to block ever!!

    7. Drafting/Scouting/Development…….major questions!!

    ——————
    It was working for 6 yards a carrying. DJ should have had 20+ carries before his fumble. We ran it 1 time inside the 5. If BA wanted to send a message he should have pounded it 3 straight times, but no he wants to go empty backfield at the 4. Everyone knows we’re an impatient team and we continue to play into it.
    ————
    Has that play where we’re in the red zone, and throw the ball to John Brown in the corner of the end zone EVER worked? Even once? I seriously flipped out at a friend’s house when I saw us run that play AGAIN for an almost interception. I can’t recall a single time where that pass has even come close to being completed.

    I am amazed at Arian’s infatuation with throwing a ball to the corner of the end zone to a 5’11 180lb receiver.
    ———————–
    I could be totally off base here, but Tyrann Mathieu doesn’t seem to handle frustration very well. I hope he has enough maturity to express things in a constructive way.

    . If you’re driving on the interstate and there’s a car that follows you from 2 yards back but never actually catches you or hits you, it’s probably Kevin Mintor.
    . In most cases, I would say the D played well enough to win today and blame the offense for this one, but Case Keenum? Really?

    Hey, at least we aren’t talking about poor snaps on ST.
    ————–

    #54365
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jeff Fisher has Rams riding high after victory in desert

    Michael Silver

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000714650/article/jeff-fisher-has-rams-riding-high-after-victory-in-desert

    GLENDALE, Ariz. — He sat in a folding chair a few feet from the showering area of the visitors’ locker room at University of Phoenix Stadium, flashing the tiniest hint of a self-satisfied smile under his ubiquitous Highway Patrolman’s mustache.

    Jeff Fisher, perhaps the NFL’s most maligned coach heading into the 2016 season, was doing his best to low-key the Los Angeles Rams’ 17-13 victory over the Arizona Cardinals on Sunday afternoon, calling his team’s third consecutive triumph after a putrid season opener “an under-the-radar win by a quiet team just going about its business.”

    It was a valiant effort — until I asked Fisher what he’d told his pumped-up players before reporters had entered the locker room, and a man who has spent 22 years of his adult life as an NFL head coach finally stopped concealing the edge that has helped him connect with several generations worth of gridiron warriors and fessed up: “I told them, ‘This was (the Cardinals’) Christmas present. We see them after Christmas (a Jan. 1 rematch at the L.A. Coliseum). This was their Christmas present. We just gave it to them early, OK?'”

    More specifically, Fisher’s trash talk was a parting gift for a certain white-haired gentleman who, at the moment, was feeling pretty far from jolly. Certainly, after watching his highly regarded team fall to 1-3 and seeing his franchise quarterback suffer a concussion on a jarring fourth-quarter takedown, Cardinals coach Bruce Arians did not need to have insult added to injury. Yet Fisher did it anyway, because frankly, at that particular moment — and I paraphrase — he did not give a damn.

    “Go back and see all the s— Bruce said against us a couple of years ago,” Fisher said, referring to Arians’ comments following a 12-6 road victory over the then-St. Louis Rams in December of 2014. (“I love it when nobody says that you will have a chance to win,” Arians had said. “There is an 11-3 team, and a team that is always 8-8. You figure it out.”)

    It’s not hard to figure out why Fisher remains so perturbed by that particular taunt: The always 8-8 stereotype is one that has been used against him increasingly as he struggles to shake the Rams out of their recent pattern of perpetual mediocrity. It’s true that Fisher has had his share of middling campaigns: In 10 of his 20 full seasons as the head coach of the Houston Oilers/Tennessee Oilers/Tennessee Titans and Rams, Fisher’s teams have gone either 8-8, 7-9 or 7-8-1. In fairness, he has also had a trio of 13-3 regular seasons, including one from the gritty Titans squad that fell a mere yard short in Super Bowl XXXIV –but it has been 13 years since his last postseason victory, and the noise questioning his credentials has grown more deafening than a Metallica concert.

    The outside world got a glimpse of Fisher’s frustration when, in the season premiere of Hard Knocks: Training Camp With the Los Angeles Rams in August, Fisher referenced the “7-9 bulls—” he vowed no longer to tolerate from his players.

    It was a stirring storyline — until the relocated Rams headed north for their season opener against the San Francisco 49ers last month and soiled themselves on Monday Night Football, suffering a 28-0 defeat in which they mustered only 186 yards of total offense.

    At that point, it looked like Fisher would have trouble winning one game, let alone seven — and that he might not make it past September. Instead, for the Rams and their suddenly swagger-drenched coach, it’s Christmas in October, something exactly no one on the outside saw coming a few weeks ago.

    “Hey, it’s L.A.” quarterback Case Keenum joked as he sat at his locker after Sunday’s victory. “It’s Hollywood. It’s a storyline… and it’s not short on drama.”

    It certainly wasn’t on Sunday, as the Rams pulled out a come-from-behind victory on the strength of a timely Tavon Austin punt return, a second Keenum touchdown pass to receiver Brian Quick with 2:36 remaining and a trio of fourth-quarter takeaways, the last a T.J. McDonald interception of a Drew Stanton Hail Mary as time expired. The Rams’ defensive devastation was an all-day affair, as they forced five turnovers and knocked out Cardinals quarterback Carson Palmer, whose head slammed violently against the turf when he was sacked by L.A. linemen Aaron Donald and Eugene Sims with five-and-a-half minutes remaining.

    And when it was over, for the second consecutive Sunday, the Rams had won a road game they had to sweat out until the final snap — and, with a 3-1 record, remained tied for the NFC West lead with the Seattle Seahawks (a team they defeated in their lone home game of the 2016 season), two games ahead of the struggling Cardinals and Niners.

    To understand how the Rams got here, you have to go back to that abysmal opening night in Santa Clara. As Fisher trudged off the Levi’s Stadium turf, he was being lambasted across the football-watching land — partly because his team looked overmatched, and partly because Jared Goff, the rookie quarterback for whom his team made a blockbuster trade to draft with the first overall pick, was in street clothes while the unheralded Keenum ran (or, in that case, attempted to run) the offense.

    We’ll get to the Goff situation in a moment. First, let’s appreciate the fact that Fisher resisted the compulsion to panic, and that his team responded accordingly.

    “My mindset was really simple,” Fisher recalled. “It was a Monday Night game, and earlier that weekend 15 other teams had lost… and a lot of ’em were good football teams. That was the message to our team, that we’re just one of the 16 teams that lost our opener. I told them, ‘We’re a good football team.’ We put it behind us as quick as we could.”

    Amazingly, Fisher seemed to be speaking the truth. And as the Rams prepared to host the NFL’s first regular-season game in Los Angeles in more than two decades, they vibed off their coach’s calm demeanor.

    “Jeff’s one of the better coaches in the league, in my opinion,” said middle linebacker Alec Ogletree, who had seven tackles against the Cardinals. “He does a great job of taking care of his players, and of getting us prepared, and we love playing for him. We’ve just got to keep playing the way he wants us to play.”

    Added Austin, who likely would have scored Sunday’s winning touchdown had Arizona’s Ifeanyi Momah not dragged him down by the facemask to short-circuit a 47-yard punt return with 5:09 remaining: “After (the 49ers defeat), I definitely was shocked. That wasn’t us. Looking back, I think we were just smelling ourselves — thinking we had arrived without putting in the work we need to put in. One thing about Coach Fisher, he always calms us down and helps us fight back. That’s where the mindset comes from that has allowed us to win these games.”

    Even after their 9-3 victory over the Seahawks at the Coliseum, the Rams still seemed shaky — in two games, they had yet to score a touchdown, which amplified the calls from outsiders for Fisher to make the switch to Goff. Instead, the coach chose to make light of the Rams’ offensive struggles, telling his players in a team meeting two days after the Seahawks victory, “I just unpacked one of the boxes from the move (to the team’s temporary training facility at Cal Lutheran University), and guess what I found in there? Some touchdowns. They do exist!”

    Later that day at practice, Fisher pulled the entire offense out of a drill and asked them to gather at the far side of one of the team’s practice fields. “This is the end zone,” Fisher deadpanned. “See, this is what it feels like.”

    Last Sunday, the Rams’ air attack got untracked in a 37-32 victory over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Keenum (18 of 30, 266 yards, two touchdowns, no interceptions) wasn’t as prolific against the Cardinals, and with star second-year running back Todd Gurley (19 carries, 33 yards) continuing to struggle to find any semblance of running room, it took a full-team effort to vanquish the Cardinals (1-3), who have now lost as many regular-season games as they did in all of 2015.

    In other words, the NFC West Crisis Watch has officially migrated east to the Valley of the Sun, while the Rams head back to Tinseltown riding high in advance of Sunday’s home game against the Buffalo Bills. And while it’s still possible Keenum could give way to Goff at some point this season, he remains the Rams’ leading man — at least in the eyes of the people who matter most.

    “Here’s what Case is to us: He’s 6-2 in our last eight games,” Rams general manager Les Snead said. “That’s the definition of him.”

    And Goff, who was the team’s second-string quarterback Sunday, says he’s perfectly cool with Fisher’s patient approach — with a not-so-surprising caveat.

    “As long as we’re winning, I’m good,” he said after Sunday’s game. “We’re 3-1, and I’m just trying to enjoy it.”

    For one thing, Goff understands that Fisher’s preference for easing him into his lofty role is a philosophical one. This was the way the coach handled the early stages of the late Steve McNair’s Titans career, with highly successful results, and Fisher says he will do what he believes is best for Goff’s development and for the franchise’s long-term interests, period.

    “That’s clear — and it’s been that way from Day 1,” Fisher said. “Our rookie quarterback is making really good progress. Our rookie quarterback is a Case Keenum fan, and Case is a Jared fan. It’s all good.”

    While Fisher and his assistants would like to see Goff reduce the amount of interceptions he throws against the scout team, they’re convinced that if thrown into the fray immediately, he has the physical skill, instincts and intelligence to thrive. That said, they recognize that he is only 21, and that many successful quarterbacks — including Palmer, now 36 — benefitted by observing and learning in the early part of their careers.

    So, even though No. 2 overall draft pick Carson Wentz has had a strong start for the Philadelphia Eagles, and other rookie quarterbacks have been effective in the first month of the 2016 season, Fisher has no qualms about playing the long game with Goff.

    Said one Rams assistant coach: “Wentz turns 24 later this year. Goff is 21. This is a lot to take in for a 21-year-old. We said in our draft meetings, if you had to play a guy right away, you’d probably take Wentz, cause he played in a pro-style system and is older. The whole point with Jared is that he doesn’t have to play right away. We love the kid.”

    Staying patient with the future face of the franchise would not seem to be the preferred approach of a man coaching for his job — but Fisher, to his credit, doesn’t seem to be especially stressed out by any of that. He declined to comment on his contract status, including the whispers that he and the Rams have already hammered out a multi-year extension that has yet to be announced, but he certainly exudes the confidence of a man who feels very secure about his present situation.

    Fisher is the first to concede that his immediate past wasn’t as fulfilling as it might have been: His first four seasons with the Rams — and the first week of his fifth season — were not without their share of 7-9 BS, or worse.

    “I know what took place here from the day we walked in the door,” Fisher said. “We took over a 2-14 team that was depleted. And we played six different quarterbacks. And now we’re starting to get some stability, and we think we can take it a lot further.”

    And if Fisher’s right? Well, Christmas in Tinseltown could be pretty festive this year, and January could be even better.

    #54163
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    “But Can He Make Music?” Thoughts on Rookie Quarterbacks

    Matt Waldman

    link: https://mattwaldmanrsp.com/2016/09/08/but-can-he-make-music-thoughts-on-rookie-quarterbacks/

    I was wrong to think that Jared Goff was the most pro ready of the 2016 rookie quarterback class. I underestimated the difficulty of the transition from Cal’s Air Raid offense to the Rams’ West Coast system. But I don’t think this is a big deal if you’re focused on the true North of the compass for what matters most for a young quarterback:

    Long-term development.

    Most people aren’t oriented this way. What we see written and discussed in major media reinforces the fallacy that rookie quarterbacks need to perform well immediately. When a lesser-regarded prospect outperforms a player of higher regard, there’s often a one-to-one comparison of the two and there shouldn’t be.

    Quarterbacks are a lot like musicians and it’s problematic to judge two rookie quarterbacks during the rehearsal process. They’re learning how to interact with their band and the performance environment and each band and environment has enough differences that most boom-bust conclusions are short-sighted.

    Jared Goff is learning an entirely new system. Will Hewlett–a quarterback coach and consultant to high school, college and professional passers–says the transition from the Air Raid system at Cal to a West Coast system with the Rams is like learning Chinese.

    If you’ve ever taken language lessons as an adult, it becomes apparent almost immediately that the process sublimate the winning traits of your personality. Learning Chinese? Forget having a quick wit or great sense of humor for months.

    Are you known for your sensitivity? You’ll be so busy focusing on what people are saying that you only catch a glimpse of how they’re saying it. Facial expressions and tone of voice are like third and fourth reads for a quarterback at your opponent’s 45 on 3rd and 12 with 1:34 left on the clock, down by 3, and dealing with the potential for A-gap pressure and missing that DE dropping into the flat.

    You’re still sensitive, witty, and intelligent. You still have those skills and others but they won’t show up nearly as often when first learning that new language. Goff’s stats show that he’s not handling pressure well and he’s make critical errors but to conclude that he’s lost these skills or analysts were wrong for ever seeing them, glosses over the realities of learning a complex system.

    And the West Coast system is the most difficult offense to learn. It’s the most common one in the league because coaches have witnessed how unstoppable it can be when at its best. However, there are few quarterbacks who can run it at that level.

    It’s like staring in one band as a tenor saxophonist and then being asked to perform a ballad like the one shown above on the soprano. There are multiple, subtle demands to evoking deep emotions from the audience and the main performer’s flaws are at much greater risk of exposure to the crowd.

    Jared Goff’s learning curve is far different but he’s judged along the same standard. RamsWire writer Jeff Smith has done a good job of telling Rams fans to freak out that Goff is the No.3 quarterback after the preseason. Smith is correct that the Rams invested a lot of capital in Goff, analysts (like me) thought Goff was the most pro-ready quarterback in the class, and Goff’s statistics haven’t been good.

    But the stats only show that Goff’s results are bad and they way they are presented, there’s a presumption that Goff should display the same qualities that made him productive at Cal. This is a bad presumption.

    The Cowboys have asked Prescott to play his best ax as a part of a strong group of players and perform songs with strict time boundaries, comfortable tempos, and tightly rehearsed forms. The Rams want Goff to learn a similar but slightly different and temperamental instrument and perform songs that have a lot more variables.

    Goff is doing a lot more thinking than performing and it’s why he’s the No.3 option. If the Rams ownership has a clue, Goff’s temporary tenure as the final backup on the depth chart is more annoying when answering media questions than it is in the locker room.

    Jeff Fisher gets his share of media criticism as an overrated coach but he believed in bringing quarterbacks along slowly. He wanted Vince Young to rely more on his brains than his body but Young didn’t become a student of the game. After a great rookie year with the team working around Young’s talents, opposing defenses generated more demands for Young to succeed and he didn’t study enough to meet them.

    Steve McNair was a student of the game and he evolved into one of the more underrated pocket passers of his time. McNair didn’t start immediately and there were concerns early on that McNair wasn’t worth the No.3 overall pick in the draft. Fisher and the Titans were patient and it paid off.

    Brett Hundley was the No.3 quarterback last year. He’s now considered a promising backup with starter potential. The notable difference in perception between Hundley and Goff is that Goff was the No.1 overall pick and Hundley dropped to the middle rounds in 2015.

    Those in the know understand that Hundley was considered an early round talent entering his junior year. If he stayed at UCLA last year, he might have earned a high-round selection.

    The public pressure on Goff and the Rams has greater intensity due to the number of picks the team traded to invest in the rookie. But if the Rams ownership and executive team is thinking clearly, they’ll look at Aaron Rodgers and Tom Brady’s career arcs.

    Neither players was remotely a No.1 overall pick in the draft. Brady began his career as the No.3. Most teams would have spent more on these two players in their prime than what the Rams spent on Goff.

    So when readers ask me, “What do you think about Jared Goff and Dak Prescott now?” it’s all about my frame of perspective. For fantasy football, Goff is a player that I’ll monitor. He’s a potential waiver-wire player in re-draft leagues later in the year.

    Prescott is at least a temporary starter with actual value in daily fantasy formats. He’s also capable of strong opening month in season-long formats.

    In dynasty leagues, I’m still drafting Goff over Prescott and there’s no hesitation. If anything, I’m getting better value on Goff. The bump in Prescott’s value makes him a little less attractive although the opportunity to solidify his future as a starter is a lot more compelling in the immediate present.

    Beyond the immediate fantasy implications of late summer and early fall, I stand by the process that led me to the results that I publish every April.

    If the Rams give Goff the time the Packers and Patriots gave to their starters–or even Washington inadvertently gave to Kirk Cousins while rushing the process with Robert Griffin III–Goff has the talent to thrive. His pocket presence, accuracy, and feel for the game hasn’t left. The new system is forcing him to think rather than play.

    If the Cowboys continue to surround Prescott with a strong band and can spotlight the rookie’s confidence and athletic ability, he’ll succeed this year. If they gradually feed him more options and responsibilities so he can grow into a well-rounded leader of an offense, he develop into a complete player.

    Quarterbacking is like making music. Thanks to our digital age, most young quarterbacks have more access to technical coaching, nutrition and training programs, and football theory than their predecessors.

    Look at their technique, athletic ability, and understanding of specific offensive ideas in a vacuum and they appear more pro-ready than in the past. But just like musicians who developed the optimal physical techniques to produce a good sound, memorized hot licks, and gained extensive knowledge of harmony, none of it matters if they can’t make it all sound musical.

    #54159
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – September 30, 2016

    (On the health of the team)

    “It’s in good shape. The only one that we didn’t have on the field this week was (DE) Will Hayes. He’ll be a game-time decision. Everybody else was good.”

    (On the biggest difference between facing a mobile quarterback, than a pocket passer)

    “He’s been in the pocket his whole career. He’s been very, very effective, and he’s won a lot of games over his career in the pocket. Believe it or not, he can move in the pocket. He’s not stationary there, he’s got a good sense, and he always keeps his eyes down field. We have to collapse the pocket as quickly as we can. Fortunately for (QB) Carson (Palmer), unfortunately for us, he’s tall, he can see. So, he knows what’s going on down the field, and he makes the right decisions. He’s got some great targets too.”

    (On if the team senses how big of a game this is)

    “Yeah, they get a feel for it. Last week was big, and the week before, every one is big. But yeah, this is a division game. We know them really well. They’re coming off a rough loss and a road trip, and they’re going to be ready. Every one is a challenge. The philosophy against these guys, and anybody for that matter, don’t watch the scoreboard, just play, just play. We’ll tell them what the score is halftime or the third quarter, just keep playing. You can’t get consumed with negative plays. They’re going to make some big plays, and we’re going to make some big plays. You expect this thing to come down to the end, as most of them do.”

    (On his thoughts of the game at Arizona last season)

    “It started off rough, as it always does against them in the run game. Fortunately for us, we scored points, and we were able to stay with the run game in the second half. That’s when we broke out and he made most of his plays, and then the four-minute run which was extraordinary. They didn’t let him do it the next time around. We came back again in September, and we didn’t play well. We had some injuries, and they got that thing fixed. They gave up some runs at Buffalo last weekend. They’re going to be determined not to give up any big plays, so we’re going to have to block better than we have.”

    (On his philosophy behind the new kickoff rule change)

    “I think it changes week-to-week. It really depends on the return concepts, what we think of their return scheme and their blockers, their returner. But given the choice, I much rather knock someone, or block here down on the 15-yard line, than just bring the ball out of the end zone and put them on the 25 (-yard line). It’s going to be an important game for us field-position wise.”

    (On what will WR Pharoh Cooper bring to the offense, once he’s healthy enough to play)

    “Hopefully, some first downs; that’s the big thing. Going out and catching first downs. He’s shown, since he’s been here, that he’s pretty effective in the plus territory. First downs and touchdowns would be great if he’s up.”

    ***

    Rams Defensive Coordinator Gregg Williams – September 29, 2016

    (On how the secondary has performed so far)

    “Those guys play every week, they scramble hard. I’m really pleased with how (defensive backs coach) Brandon (Fisher) and (secondary coach) Dennard (Wilson) are coaching them. I’ve been around both those guys for so long and it’s fun for me to hear those coaches take some raw and sometimes young projects and teach them to play the way we want them to play – because we play very aggressive secondary concepts and stuff. Those guys have grown a lot, (CB) Troy (Hill) has come in here and battled for a spot, (DB) Coty’s (Sensabaugh) still battling and E.J. (Gaines), it’s going to be fun to see if he answers the bell this week – the head coach will make the determination – it’s been a while since he’s played. He had a really good camp, I like him a lot, I know an awful lot about him from the high school he grew up in, in the same conference that I grew up in back over in Kansas City. It’ll be fun to see those guys play. But the safeties have really come a long way, also. And all those guys, they have their work cut out for them when we are able to play the run aggressively and force you to throw the ball 58 times in a game. You can get hung up on all the analytics you want, but when you force somebody to throw it 58 times in a game, it’s because they can’t run it. And those guys have a lot of heat on them at all times, and this league is a throwing league. There are some teams that’ll still try to pound you – one of them is coming up – the Arizona Cardinals, I have so much respect for (Cardinals head coach) Bruce Arians, I’ve gone against him for so many different years at so many different spots and I’ve been at so many different spots. We’re going to have to play the run really hard and they’ve got a quarterback that can take shots on you down the field.”

    (On defensive back being a thankless job with the cards stacked against you)

    “In a lot of ways in the league and also in the interpretation of the rules. The more physical you are, the better you are – they’ll come up with a new rule next year because everybody wants to see the ball thrown more.”

    (On what becomes the measuring stick)

    “The measuring stick is this, it’s that points allowed. And we have to do a good job, we have to make a few more field goals happen down in the red zone. The first game, third game, we didn’t do as well there as we would like to do, but they played very aggressively. When you make an earned play – those guys get paid, too – and when they make tight throws, some of the quarterbacks in our league, and we’ve played against some good ones already, can make the tight throws and uncover the receivers against very good leverage that our defensive backs are playing with – (Cardinals QB) Carson Palmer is one of those guys.”

    (On the Cardinals’ receiver group)

    “Outstanding. They’ve good deep speed and a future Hall of Famer in (WR) Larry Fitzgerald – he can uncover against any kind of coverage, and he plays basketball on grass. He does a very good job and Carson trusts him so much, to be able to uncover on whatever coverage you are running. Even in double situations, when you double that guy, he’s still able to get open in those situations. They’ve got a good mix, they’ve got a good plan, they’ve got a good conceptual plan on how Bruce wants them to play in the offensive philosophy and we’ve got our work cut out for us.”

    (On what is says about DT Aaron Donald that he can play defensive end and still play very well)

    “He played all four positions for us last week, really. And let’s talk about seven positions – because we have four positions when we have four D-linemen out there and we have three other positions when we have our three-down packages. He played in all seven of those spots last week, that’s the kind of guy you want. And I’ve said this before, every single player on defense has to play a primary position and backup position, he played a backup in seven different positions, and that speaks volumes for him. He didn’t even bat an eye, he got out there and played for us and played very strong in those areas. People want to get hung up on the sacks part of it, that will come. He is such a good football player, he can do so many things I can’t even coach. He’s so intelligent, he gives us a lot of pitches to be able to throw out there and he helped us in some tough situations at the D-line – injury position and then we lost one on an ejection. It was pretty good that he did that.”

    (On what getting pressure on a team that throws a deep ball does)

    “You would like to say this – and our guys get tired of hearing me say – that rush and coverage work hand-in-hand. The first thing I look at on a deep ball is not the defensive back, I look at the rush, that’s the very first person I blame. A defensive back that has to cover somebody 45, 50 yards down the field and a D-lineman has a one-on-one rush – in some cases, maybe he’s doubled – but there’s somebody that’s up there that had a one-on-rush for five steps. No, no, no, no, I look at the rush first over the deep coverage concepts, that’s how we play defense, hand-in-hand. We have to do a better job at that, and we’ve done pretty good, we’ve eliminated a lot of shots last week. (Buccaneers QB) Jameis Winston had been taking a ton of shots. How many shots did he take against us? I’ll tell you, none. But Carson and Bruce will do a good job, and we’re going to have to handle that situation.”

    ***

    Rams Running Back Todd Gurley – September 30, 2016

    (On last year’s game against Arizona – first career start):

    “First start, yeah. First win. Gave up a touchdown. It was a good game. It was my first start and we were on the road, division opponent – we went in there and we won. It was a good feeling for sure.”

    (On whether he was nervous prior to his first career start against Arizona last year)

    “Not really. I had played the week before, got like six carries. I was just so anxious to get back on the field, because I went for like six carries for nine yards. So, I was just ready to play again, try to redeem myself.”

    (On how much closer he felt to busting a long run in last week’s game against Tampa Bay, versus how he felt in the first two games)

    “Definitely, I felt like stuff got going – definitely in the second half. There’s always that, you’re just so close, you just got to stay patient and hopefully, it’ll come soon. It’s definitely been opening up.”

    (On whether that 15 – yard run he had last year against Arizona, ranks up with the better ones he’s had in his career thus far)

    “Probably like top 10.”

    (On whether it would’ve been higher if he had got a touchdown)

    “Yeah, it probably would’ve been top five, if I got the touchdown.”

    (On what he sees when he watches that run on film)

    “Just good balance. Just able to keep myself up with my arm, doing pop-up drills. Just hard running and of course, (WR) Tavon (Austin) blocking his tail off for me, definitely saw that. Hopefully, I can get some more runs like that this week.”

    (On why the Cardinals’ defense is so hard to run against)

    “They’re just physical. They have great linebackers, great defensive lineman, and their DB’s can tackle –they want to tackle, and they have great ball skills. They’re just a great overall defense. They come with a lot of blitzes.”

    (On whether Arizona is a defense that if you get past the first level you can go all the way)

    “Yeah, if the Honey Badger (S Tyrann Mathieu) doesn’t come to get you or ‘Pat P’ (CB Patrick Peterson), he’s fast as well. They have some players, for sure – (DT) Calais (Campbell), ‘Pat P’, (LB Kevin) Minter – a lot of guys that can play different positions. That’s what makes them unique.”

    (On what he remembers about Arizona’s four minute drill during last year’s game)

    “Like I said, going down on that touchdown, I could’ve got it, but you know, just wanting to get out of there, and get in victory formation. But it’s definitely a good feeling, be in it for a minute – running the ball, able to get first downs at the end of the game. That’s what it’s all about. We didn’t get a chance to do that last week –hopefully, we can do it again this week.”

    #54127
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams’ offense takes ‘a step,’ still has work to do

    Alden Gonzalez

    http://www.espn.com/blog/los-angeles-rams/post/_/id/30975/rams-offense-takes-a-step-still-has-work-to-do

    THOUSAND OAKS, Calif. — The Los Angeles Rams’ offense is in no way great, but it is improving. The unit has gone from 185 yards from scrimmage in Week 1 to 283 yards in Week 2 to 320 yards in Week 3. On Sunday, in a 37-32 win against Tampa Bay that made them 2-1 for the first time in 10 years, the Rams not only became the last team to score a touchdown; they scored four on offense.

    “It’s a step,” Rams quarterback Case Keenum said. “I think each week is. We’re trying to get better. I think for us, it’s not something that we dwell on, not scoring touchdowns. Maybe you guys [the media] probably did a little more than we did; just a little bit. That’s something we came here to do, and we’re all used to doing. Everybody in that meeting room, we’re used to scoring touchdowns. It felt normal, felt right, felt good.”

    The Rams face a big test at University of Phoenix Stadium on Sunday, against an Arizona team that has beaten them four of the past five times and will be eager to avenge a lopsided defeat against hapless Buffalo in Week 3. Even in the midst of a surprising 1-2 start, the Cardinals rank within the top 10 in points per game. And the Rams’ offense will have to be at its best to keep up.

    It’ll be up to Keenum, who has played better of late — 32-of-56 for 429 yards, two touchdowns and an interception — but still has the worst Total QBR among the 31 qualified quarterbacks. And it will be up to the offensive line, which must do a better job opening up holes for Todd Gurley, who ranks 39th out of 45 running backs in yards per carry.

    Rams coach Jeff Fisher has continually said Gurley is “very close” to breaking off big runs.

    “The cliché that it’s a game of inches has been around for a long time for a reason,” Rams offensive coordinator Rob Boras said. “There’s a lot of those where you can see — whether it’s a couple inches or a foot, whatever it is — where it’s potential to being an explosive run. We’re just going to be patient with it, and they’re going to come.”

    The Cardinals are the team Gurley broke out against last season. It was Week 4, which marked his first NFL start, when Gurley rushed for 146 yards on 19 carries, on his way to an unprecedented four-game stretch to begin his carreer. But those same Cardinals held Gurley to 41 yards on nine carries when they met again in Week 13. And if you go back to his past 11 games, Gurley has gained triple-digit yardage on the ground only once.

    The Rams attained more points and more rushing yards in Week 3 than they did in their first two weeks combined, but they have still managed an NFL-worst three trips to the red zone, after getting into the red zone an NFL-worst 36 times last season.

    Boras simply called Sunday’s win “another step” for his offense.

    “I think it was a step in the right direction. There’s a lot of positives that we’re going to try to build on. And just like any time you play a game, there’s a lot of things there that were mistakes or things that we left out there that we know we can do better. It was, again, a step — probably a bigger step than it was the week before — and we’re going to continue to get better.”

    Some additional notes coming out of Wednesday’s practice …
    The Rams acquired defensive back Marqui Christian off waivers from the Cardinals. To make room on the roster, defensive back Isaiah Johnson was waived. Christian is from Midwestern State and was drafted in the fifth round this year.

    Receiver Tavon Austin was limited in practice with what the team called a shoulder injury. Cornerback E.J. Gaines was a full participant, as were receivers Pharoh Cooper and Nelson Spruce, a strong indication that all three will debut in Week 3. Defensive end Will Hayes (ankle), cornerback Lamarcus Joyner (toe), and defensive tackle Dominique Easley (illness) were held out.

    Defensive tackle Aaron Donald on Houston Texans star J.J. Watt, who might not play again this season after re-injuring his back: “It’s tough for him. You never want to hear about a guy being injured, missing a season. Definitely not a guy who plays at such a high level as that guy. … He’s a playmaker. Any time a guy is flying around, making plays like that, he’s going to be a fun player to watch. Definitely somebody you respect and you tune in to watch.”

    Cardinals coach Bruce Arians called the Rams’ defensive line “one of the best” and identified Donald and defensive end Robert Quinn as “two complete game-wreckers.” Arians called Alec Ogletree “a perfect “Mike” linebacker for that system, because of his speed. He can hang on the pass, and then still make up for it on the run.”

    #54087
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Jared Goff’s slow progress with Rams reminds Arizona’s Carson Palmer of his own long wait

    JACK WANG

    http://www.ocregister.com/articles/palmer-730500-season-goff.html

    Thirteen years ago, Carson Palmer sat and waited.

    He had been the No. 1 overall pick in the 2003 draft, the Heisman winner out of USC, and the best hope for the Cincinnati Bengals to turn themselves around from a run of 11 losing records in 12 seasons.

    And still, he sat and waited. Through his entire rookie season, the quarterback never appeared in a game. Instead, the Bengals took a slower route with Palmer’s development, letting Jon Kitna mentor him while the team waddled its way to an 8-8 record.

    More than a decade later, the Rams are doing the same with top-drafted quarterback Jared Goff, plopping him on the bench while journeyman Case Keenum tries to turn around what has been one of the league’s most anemic offenses.

    This Sunday at University of Phoenix Stadium, when the Cardinals host the Rams, Palmer will stand within sight of Goff – at once a symbol of what could lie ahead, and of a more patient, bygone era.

    In the early 2000s, it was not at all out of style to sit rookie quarterbacks. Even on the day of the draft, there was little expectation that Palmer would contribute immediately.

    But Goff, who has yet to appear in an NFL regular-season game, is now a glaring exception, becoming the first top-drafted quarterback not to start a season opener since Jamarcus Russell in 2007. Not only that, four other rookies have already been thrown into the fire this season, the best of whom is No. 2 overall pick Carson Wentz, who has led the Eagles to a 3-0 start.

    This youth movement around the league has not changed Jeff Fisher’s approach with Goff, who struggled in the preseason.

    “I’m happy for young quarterbacks when they have success,” the Rams coach said this week, “but we have our own sense of timing here with him.”

    Fisher added that the four others have been thrust into action due to injuries, whether on their team or elsewhere. Wentz moved up to first string after Philadelphia traded Sam Bradford to the Vikings, who had lost Teddy Bridgewater to a dislocated knee and torn ACL. Dak Prescott (Cowboys), Jacoby Brissett (Patriots) and Cody Kessler (Browns) – all of whom were either third- or fourth-round picks this spring – have been injury replacements.

    Palmer seems inclined to side with Fisher. “You either throw the guy in there or you let him sit back and rest,” he said Wednesday. “Only the coaches know what’s going on within the building, know what’s best for the team.”

    That Palmer waited a full year to start certainly did not hurt his career. The Santa Margarita High graduate made back-to-back Pro Bowls in 2005 and 2006, and won an AFC North title. A severe knee injury set him back, but after an acrimonious split with the Bengals and an unproductive stint in Oakland, Palmer staged a comeback last season by providing MVP-caliber play for Arizona.

    The Cardinals have stumbled out of the gate this season, losing two of their first three games despite being one of the preseason favorites to reach the Super Bowl. But Palmer, whom Arizona’s Bruce Arians described as the most “resilient guy that I’ve ever coached,” has seen it all already.

    He was also 24 years old when he made his first NFL start. Goff is still two weeks shy of 22.

    Sitting out his first year, Palmer said, gave him a chance to learn the ropes.

    “You have a chance to watch how this league is – how you prepare as a starter, how you go about your business as a starter, especially if you’re coming from a very non-pro style offense,” Palmer said. “Seeing how offenses prepare, seeing the different pressures you’re going to see and the different defenses you’re going to see.

    “It’s tough if you’re not ready and you get thrown in there. If you struggle, it can linger.”

    #54076
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams Head Coach Jeff Fisher – September 28, 2016

    (Opening remarks)
    “Well you can see how fast the days go by, and the weeks go by in our business. Really good day today. We backed down a little bit, just because of what we went through Sunday late afternoon. Players are off tomorrow. We’ll see most of them, and we’ll finish up strong on Friday. We’ve got a great opponent, very well-coached team, all three phases. We know each other very well. It’s going to come down to making some plays. The plan is going in well. Come Sunday, it’s going to be in the players’ hands. I like our chances.”

    (On if he reminded the players that they’re facing the defending NFC West Champions)
    “The players know that, they know that. Year after year it’s either Seattle or Arizona or San Francisco. They know that, they know we also have a great opportunity to play one of the best teams in ball, based on the way they played last year, and they’re playing well. The division is not at stake right now, it’s just the outcome that we’re dedicated to.”

    (On how to get RB Todd Gurley going, and the role he plays in freeing up the passing game)
    “They witnessed it as well. They’re going to do everything they can so it doesn’t happen again, and we have to find a way. Obviously, Todd’s production in this game is going to be important towards having a chance to win. We’re going to have to get him involved, and keep him involved throughout the game. That game there, I think it was Week 4, he was involved until the end. The game-breaker was the big run where he took a knee, and all that. But, we can’t let this game become one-dimensional. That’s going to be up to our offense, and our defense, and our special teams.”

    (On his thoughts regarding the new kickoff rule of bringing the ball out to the 25-yard line)
    “I got off the committee this offseason, so this rule change was made after I got off the committee.”

    (On if he game plans around making sure kickoffs stay out the end zone, to ensure a return)
    “Any time you change a rule like that there, what the competition committee refers to is there’s going to be unintended consequences. So, you don’t know until you go through it. My understanding is it’s just for a year, and we’ll see. But, that’s a discussion that I would’ve had, had I been there, is that we may just increase the number of kickoffs. You just bang the ball out of the back of the end zone, the ball is on the 25-yard line. Especially if you got kickers now with hang time, they can drop the ball a couple yards deep and entice the returner to come out, or on the goal line, and you got a good cover scheme, you can knock people down inside the 20-yard line. So, you gain the field position advantage. But I haven’t seen the numbers, so I don’t know where the numbers are after three weeks.”

    (On if game planning around the kickoff rule change is something he’s discussed with the team)
    “That’s a competitive issue. I’ll say maybe (laughter).”

    (On if he’s seen a shift in the team’s confidence from Week 1 to now)
    “No, I don’t. There was disappointment after Week 1, but we pulled them out of it. That’s what we’re most proud of right now. There’s no lack of confidence at all. They have confidence in each other and they’re playing together. I think that’s carried us through the last couple weeks.”

    (On his relationship with Cardinals QB Carson Palmer)
    “I just have great respect for him, wherever he’s been. He had some great years there at Cincinnati. There was that, ‘What if’ that was kind of that defining moment there on whether he was going to play or not, and then he got a chance to go to Oakland, and now he’s found a great home with (Head Coach) Bruce (Arians) there, and great people around him. He’s highly competitive, and every time we play them it’s quite a challenge.”

    (On how important it is to limit a high-powered offense, like Arizona, to field goals when defending the red zone)
    “Any time you play an offense like this, it’s like the old Peyton Manning days. You have to take the approach that field goals are a win for your defense. The ball is going to get pushed down the field, you got to keep them out of the end zone – a field goal is a win. So when you take that approach, you have to counter it with touchdowns to have a chance to beat them.”

    (On his thoughts regarding Dodgers broadcaster Vin Scully)
    “Yeah, I got a chance to send him a voice-over. My memories of Vin were the hot summer nights here in the Valley and that little AM radio…it was actually wood…and it just had a volume, and you had to move the dial. But listening to him on the summer nights, going to sleep listening to the broadcast with (Ron) Cey, (Steve) Garvey, and (Bill) Russell, and (Davey) Lopes, that was my era growing up. He’s had a fabulous career. I understand that his last comments on the final home game was a walk-off. How appropriate is that for him? He’s a legend in my mind.”

    (On if he knew that walk-off home run occurred during the lightening delay in Tampa)
    “I did not know that, no. Wow, there’s a lot of things going on (laughter).”

    ***

    Rams Offensive Coordinator Rob Boras – September 28, 2016

    (On if he saw some improvement on Sunday from previous weeks)
    “Yeah, like I said a week ago, it was another step. I think it was a step in the right direction. There’s a lot of positives that we’re going to try to build on. And just like any time you play a game, there’s a lot of things there that were mistakes or things that we left out there that we know we can do better. It was, again, a step, probably a bigger step than it was the week before and we’re going to continue to get better.”

    (On if there are times when he’s watching film of RB Todd Gurley and he’s just missing a big run seemingly by an inch)
    “The cliché that it’s a game of inches has been around for a long time for a reason. There’s a lot of those where you can see whether it’s a couple inches or a foot, whatever it is, where it’s a potential to being an explosive run. We’re just going to be patient with it and they’re going to come. Again, that one run he had down in the low redzone that he took from the 16 (yard-line) down to the one was about as good of a 15-yard run as I think you’re ever going to see. I think, again, as effective as he was, it’s going to continue to get better for us.”

    (On if seeing Gurley being that close to a big run gives him hope that it’s just around the corner)
    “Sure, and we’ve seen it in the past and we’re going to see it again sooner than later. He is as talented of a runner as I’ve ever been around and we’re going to continue to get better in the run game blocking and he’s going to make his decisions. There’s going to be some good things that are going to happen for us.”

    (On possibly being two games ahead of Arizona in the standings with a win this week)
    “There’s a lot of football left, though. That’s all you can do is play the game that’s in front of you and you can’t look ahead. We’ve played three games, we’ve got a lot more to go, so we’re going to take this one and then we’ll move on to whoever we have next and see what happens.”

    (On the importance of potentially being two games above .500 after Sunday)
    “Yeah, again, anytime you can get above .500 is a great thing. Again, there’s a lot of football left, the guys know it and we’re focusing on Arizona right now. Once we focus on Arizona, then we’ll move onto the next one. Anytime you win, it’s really good, I’m not trying to belittle it, we just have to focus on this game in front of us right now.”

    (On what is holding TE Tyler Higbee back after having a strong preseason)
    “Tyler is playing probably between 22 and 30 snaps a game, so he’s getting on the field. He hasn’t had the targets, really, since the San Fran game and that’s not necessarily always by design, either, it’s just the progression of where the ball is going. He’s getting better. Again, as a former tight end coach, the success of a tight end is not always based on receptions, there’s a lot of other things that we ask him to do. On the touchdown pass to (WR) Tavon (Austin) in the fourth quarter, Tyler was in protecting. For a guy that used to be a converted wide receiver, he had a big block in protection because (TE) Lance (Kendricks) wasn’t on the field. I know we all want to see catches, but there’s a lot more things that tight ends do and we’re pleased with the direction that Tyler’s going.”

    (On if it was a relief to get the team’s first touchdown last week)
    “We knew it was coming.”

    (On Todd Gurley’s breakout game last year against the Cardinals and things Arizona might look at on film to prevent)
    “Any time you play a team in your conference like we have with Seattle a couple weeks ago and now with Arizona, we know each other. They do what they do, we do what we do. They know what we do and we know what they do. Again, it’s just trusting the process and you’re going to try to window dress some things, but we’re going to run our plays and try to take advantage of what we think we can do to spring not only Todd, but (RB) Benny (Cunningham) or in the pass game, to have our success as well.”

    (On how big it was, confidence-wise for QB Case Keenum that the first touchdown was scored on a long pass)
    “Obviously, it’s going to help confidence. I don’t care if it was a one-yard pass or a 44-yard pass. Anytime you score a touchdown is a good thing. All of us and, again, being the first drive of the game, we’ve scored twice in a row now, with a field goal against Seattle and a touchdown (against Tampa Bay). When you can start fast, and this time with a touchdown, it gives everybody confidence and it lets everybody play a little more confident and hopefully a little faster and go out there. The fact that it was a long one is great, but the fact that we scored, however it was, was more important.”

    (On if he has any direct communication with Keenum on the sidelines)
    “I can talk a couple different ways. We have a headset down there or I can talk to him – I can pick up the telephone or just talk through (quarterbacks) coach (Chris) Weinke to get to him.”

    (On if he had any message for him after Keenum’s interception)
    “You just have to play, there’s a lot of football left. We all saw what happened, obviously a mistake, but we also knew there was a lot of football left and you have got to play the next play. And that’s what, I think, he did and the rest of the team did – you had a play the next play and we moved on.”

    (On if it is a big accomplishment to possibly be 3-1 with three of the first four games on the road)
    “Yeah, I think our guys are getting more confident right now. To start like that would be great. The thing is, as we all know, there was still a lot of things that we want to get better at and that’s the challenge. The new challenges are now we are playing the Arizona Cardinals, who are a really good football team. To get to 3-1, again, would be great, but we have to focus on playing the game and see what happens. Arizona is a very talented football team.”

    (On how Arizona’s aggressiveness on defense impacts what the offense is going to try to do)
    “Like I said, they are a very good defense, they are aggressive with their pressures. Again, we’re just going to have to do what we do. We’re anticipating the pressure and we’re going to have some answers for it and see if we can take advantage of some of those.”

    (On if there is anything he notices that Arizona is doing differently this year)
    “Everybody has the wrinkles. Just like, I think when they look at us, offensively, they’re going to see some things we do different. And that’s why you have an offseason and OTAs and training camp, so there’s always a couple things that you see. It’s still the Arizona Cardinals’ defense when you see it.”

    ***

    Rams Quarterback Case Keenum – September 28, 2016

    (On executing on offense – scoring four touchdowns)
    “We executed – we executed in crucial situations. I think two of them were on third downs. Getting down to the red zone even with negative plays, you know, we overcame those things. Got in goal line situations, let 30 (RB Todd Gurley) do what 30 does.”

    (On whether it is a big step offensively)
    “It’s a step. I think each week is. We’re trying to get better. I think for us, it’s not something that we dwell on, not scoring touchdowns. Maybe you guys probably did a little more than we did – just a little bit. That’s something we came here to do, and we’re all used to doing, everybody in that meeting room, we’re used to scoring touchdowns. It felt normal, felt right, felt good.”

    (On how it felt, from a confidence standpoint, getting the first touchdown on a long pass)
    “Awesome. It was fun. Anytime you score touchdowns – I tend to get pretty juiced up. Especially, when you throw them. On a third down conversion to have, my guy (WR Brian) Quick, make a big play down the field, it felt really good.”

    (On the biggest difference between the first game against the 49ers and last Sundays games against the Buccaneers)
    “There’s a lot of differences. You can look on film – we just executed on third down. I think we met our goal on third down, we still had some plays that could be made. Like I said, we got better. There’s still room to grow, which in my mind is a really good spot to be in, that we can get better – we played well. ”

    (On what it would mean to potentially be 3-1 after Sunday’s game against Arizona)
    “Anytime you win in this league it’s big. Each time you do win, it makes the next win that much bigger. So, you might be asking me the same question next week – I hope you are, you know, for 4-1. Thats why we have the mindset of just going 1-0 that week, and focusing on that week. You can’t really think about what’s happened, you can’t really think too much about what’s ahead – you got to think about this week. There’s enough on our plate this week to think about the magnitude of things.”

    (On what stands out regarding the Cardinals defensively after not getting the chance to face them last season)
    “No, I was not playing. But, obviously studied them and was a part of the game plan process. I mean, it’s the Cardinals defense. They’re really good – they got a lot of players. Front end, it’s one of the best in the league, with (DT Calais) Campbell spearheading it up there in front – (LB Deone) Bucannon, those backers are really good too. Then obviously, a guy you’ve probably heard of, Patrick Peterson back there and the honey badger (S Tyrann Mathieu) too, they’re all over the place. We got our work cut out for us, identifying fronts and coverages – knowing where they’re lined up. Then, obviously, not just knowing – knowing how to execute and how to win. How to win certain plays, get first downs. We got our work cut out for us. It’s a big challenge.”

    (On Patrick Peterson being a player to always be aware of – identifying where he is at all times)
    “Yeah, for sure. With these guys though, you kind of have to know where they all are. I mean, they can all make plays, they can all do really, really good things. Obviously, 21 makes a lot of plays and he’s around the ball a lot, he’s definitely a guy we’re going to have our eye on. ”

    (On getting into a rhythm rather than thinking about things too much – doing what he’s seeing)
    “I think so. I think I’m getting better. That’s what I’ve got to do, that’s what I concentrate on, is getting better. I think getting out of my own way at times has really helped. I think just trusting – trusting what I’m seeing, trusting my guys. I think we’re on a good path right now and I want to continue that.”

    (On getting out of his own way)
    “It’s like I said before, thinking too much, not trusting my instincts, not letting myself play football, handcuffing myself from seeing too much or seeing too little.”

    #53922
    Avatar photojoemad
    Participant

    Gurley, ……..defenses are keying on him, especially with a QB like Case that gives a strong perception that the Rams have a one dimensional run offense with a ROY in the backfield…..

    it was good to see the Rams remain patient with the run game even when they were down 20-10….. Gurley had 27 carries, only 10 or so in the 1st half… I thought that he was utilized well, especially in the 2nd half….

    Regarding Benny, he did convert the long 3rd and 17…it was a nice play call with the delayed handoff … that 22 yard run by Benny caught the Bucs off guard to get the 1st down that ultimately set up a 53 yarder by Zuerliner. Speaking Zuerline… he’s have a very solid year thus far… special teams was a big factor yesterday, Greg the Leg delivered and Aguayo for the Bucs did not…..

    just image if they still had Tre Mason…… Rams would be really deep at RB…

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    STRANGERS IN THEIR OWN LAND
    Anger and Mourning on the American Right
    By Arlie Russell Hochschild
    351 pp. The New Press. $27.95.

    Arlie Hochschild’s generous but disconcerting look at the Tea Party presents a likable fellow named Lee Sherman, who once worked for a Louisiana chemical plant where his duties included illegally dumping toxic waste into the bayou.

    Sherman did the dirty work; then the company did him dirty. After 15 years on the job, he was doused with chemicals that “burned my clothes clean off me” and left him ill. But rather than pay his disability costs, his bosses accused him of absenteeism and fired him.

    Sherman became a fledgling environmentalist and got his revenge after a giant fish kill threatened the livelihood of nearby fishermen. Company officials feigned innocence, but Sherman barged into a public meeting with an incriminating sign: I’M THE ONE WHO DUMPED IT IN THE BAYOU. Fast-forward a couple of decades and Sherman, still an environmentalist, is campaigning for a Tea Party congressman who wants to gut the Environmental Protection Agency. Sherman still distrusts chemical companies, but he distrusts the federal government more, because it spends his tax money on people who “lazed around days and partied at night.”

    In “Strangers in Their Own Land,” which has been nominated for a National Book Award, Hochschild calls this the “Great Paradox” — opposition to federal help from people and places that need it — and sets off across Louisiana on an energetic, open-minded quest to understand it.

    A distinguished Berkeley sociologist, Hochschild is a woman of the left, but her mission is empathy, not polemics. She takes seriously the Tea Partiers’ complaints that they have become the “strangers” of the title — triply marginalized by flat or falling wages, rapid demographic change, and liberal culture that mocks their faith and patriotism. Her affection for her characters is palpable.

    But the resentments she finds are as toxic as the pollutants in the marsh and metastasizing throughout politics. What unites her subjects is the powerful feeling that others are “cutting in line” and that the federal government is supporting people on the dole — “taking money from the workers and giving it to the idle.” Income is flowing up, but the anger points down.

    The people who feel this are white. The usurpers they picture are blacks and immigrants. Hochschild takes care not to call anyone racist but concludes that “race is an essential part of this story.” When she asks a small-town mayor to describe his politics, his first two issues — or is it one in his mind? — are welfare and race: “I don’t like the government paying unwed mothers to have a lot of kids, and I don’t go for affirmative action.”

    In welfare politics, this is déjà vu all over again. It’s been two decades since Bill Clinton signed a tough welfare law aimed in part to end the politics of blame. “Ending welfare as we know it” would recast the needy as workers, he said, and build support for a new safety net. The rolls of the main federal cash program have fallen by 80 percent from their 1990s highs — in Louisiana, by 95 percent. But reverse class anger is more potent than ever.

    Liberals have long wondered why ­working-class voters support policies that (the liberals think) hurt the working class. Why would victims of pollution side with the polluters?

    Theories abound. Thomas Frank accuses the G.O.P. of luring voters with social issues but delivering tax cuts for the rich. Others point to the political machines built by ultra-wealthy donors like Charles and David Koch. Still others emphasize the influence of conservative media like Fox News.

    Hochschild sees these as partial explanations but wants a fuller understanding of “emotion in politics” — she wants to know how Tea Partiers feel, on the theory that the movement serves their “emotional self-interest” by providing “a giddy release” from years of frustration.

    Six characters dominate the book, including Harold Areno, who lives on a swamp so polluted even the rugged cypress trees are dead. He and his wife have had cancer. Yet Areno supports politicians hostile to environmental regulation because he cares more about banning abortion. “We vote for candidates that put the Bible where it belongs,” he said.

    Mike Schaff lost his neighborhood to the Bayou Corne sinkhole, which started to swallow 37 acres in 2012 after a lightly regulated drilling company punctured an underground salt dome. But he remains a “free market man,” because “Big Government” threatens “community.”

    Many Tea Party adherents warn that more regulation will cost them jobs. (A small-town mayor says the pungent chemical plant “smells like rice and ­gravy.”) But Hochschild detects other passions and assembles what she calls the “deep story” — a “feels as if” story, beyond facts or judgment, that presents her subjects’ worldview.

    It goes like this:

    “You are patiently standing in a long line” for something you call the American dream. You are white, Christian, of modest means, and getting along in years. You are male. There are people of color behind you, and “in principle you wish them well.” But you’ve waited long, worked hard, “and the line is barely moving.”

    Then “Look! You see people cutting in line ahead of you!” Who are these interlopers? “Some are black,” others “immigrants, refugees.” They get affirmative action, sympathy and welfare — “checks for the listless and idle.” The government wants you to feel sorry for them.

    And who runs the government? “The biracial son of a low-income single mother,” and he’s cheering on the line cutters. “The president and his wife are line cutters themselves.” The liberal media mocks you as racist or homophobic. Everywhere you look, “you feel betrayed.”

    Hochschild runs the myth past her Tea Party friends.

    “You’ve read my mind,” Lee Sherman said.

    “I live your analogy,” Mike Schaff said.

    Harold Areno’s niece agrees, and says she has seen people drive their children to Head Start in Lexuses. “If people refuse to work, we should let them starve,” she said.

    Actually, anger this raw may depart from the 1990s, when welfare critics often framed their attacks as efforts to help the poor by fighting dependency. The resentments Hochschild presents are unadorned, and they have mutated into a broader suspicion of almost everything the federal government does. “The government has gone rogue, corrupt, malicious and ugly,” one Tea Partier complains. “It can’t help anybody.”

    Did welfare really “end”? Conservatives say no. Cash aid plummeted, but food stamp usage soared to new highs and the Medicaid rolls expanded. There’s room for debate, but the grievances Hochschild presents feel immune to policy solutions. As long as larger forces are squeezing whites of modest means, it’s going to “feel as if” people are cutting in line. In Lexuses.

    None of Hochschild’s characters appear to have been directly hurt by competition from people of color. Their economic problems lie elsewhere, she argues, in unchecked corporate power and technological transformation. Still there’s no denying that demographic and cultural change have robbed white men of the status they once enjoyed. Hochschild doesn’t buy the racial finger-pointing, but she can see their pain.

    Whatever racial or class resentments she finds, Hochschild makes clear that she likes the people she meets. They aren’t just soldiers in a class war but victims of one, too. She mourns their economic losses, praises their warmth and hospitality, and admires their “grit and resilience.” While her hopes of finding common political ground seem overly optimistic, this is a smart, respectful and compelling book.

    Jason DeParle, a reporter for The New York Times and an Emerson Fellow at New America, is writing a book about immigration.

    A version of this review appears in print on September 25, 2016, on page BR16 of the Sunday Book Review with the headline: Feeling Their Pain. Today’s Paper|Subs

    • This topic was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    • This topic was modified 9 years, 7 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    #53128
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams claim to have seen good things on defense Monday, but it’s time for that unit to fulfill its reputation

    http://www.dailynews.com/sports/20160916/los-angeles-rams-claim-to-have-seen-good-things-on-defense-monday-but-its-time-for-that-unit-to-fulfill-its-reputation

    By THOUSAND OAKS >> The Rams will have a great defense someday.

    That, of course, can be a promise without end.

    Greg Norman was going to win the Masters someday. Healthy bacon was going to come along someday. Heck, pro football was coming back someday. The Rams fixed that, but they have brought it back to a notably impatient place.

    The defense was one thing we knew about this unfamiliar team with the familiar name that returned to our lives Jan. 12. If nothing else, the Rams could stop you. They had four first-round picks on defense and, in some eyes, the best player in the NFL in Aaron Donald.

    During those years, they also had to carry around the Rams’ offense like a box of anchors.

    Then came Monday night: San Francisco 28, L.A. 0.

    “We played very strong in that ballgame,” said defensive coordinator Gregg Williams Friday, indicating that the strain of keeping that promise might be getting to him.

    But he elaborated.

    “We have to do a better job in the red zone,” he said. “That’s something we’ve always done well in the past. We extended some of their drives with penalties. And we got our hands on three balls that legitimately hit us in the hands and should have been interceptions, and two of them would have gone for touchdowns. Our guys know that and they’ll come back. And I was very pleased with the way they responded at halftime.”

    The Rams were second in the league last year in preventing red zone touchdowns, at 41.3 percent, and fourth in 2014.

    “The worst part was giving 28 points, and it doesn’t matter how the offense did if you are going to give up points,” linebacker Alec Ogletree said. “We had some missed reads in the red zone, some missed tackles. Things happened really fast.”

    San Francisco scored four touchdowns in four red zone trips and the Rams lost a net 92 yards in penalties. The 49ers had three touchdown drives that took 10, 10 and 11 plays. Etc.

    “We had a couple of short fields,” Williams said. “We’re usually good on sudden change, making people kick field goals. One of those drives we had a second-and-15 and we had pass interference, and another time we had second-and-13 and the guy (Blaine Gabbert) threw it right in there. … What I liked was that before I could say anything, the guys were coming up to me and they were bringing it up. That’s when you know things are going well, when they take ownership.

    “They extended some plays with their quarterbacks, and that’s when you don’t want to be reading my lips on the sideline. But otherwise we held their running game down pretty well.”

    Still, the Rams are holding onto someday a little too long.

    In 2015 the Rams ranked 12th in the 32-team NFL in yards allowed per play. They were sixth on third-down defense, seventh in passing TDs allowed, 13th in touchdowns allowed. The year before they were 24th in yards-per-play defense, and 18th the year before that.

    That is good but not dominant, and their ambition is dominance. A glimpse came in Week 16 last year, when William Hayes sacked Russell Wilson three times (for 24 1/2 yards) and the Rams won in Seattle, 23-17. Three of Seattle’s 10 losses in 2014-15 have come to the Rams, and one of them came with Nick Foles posting a quarterback rating of 115.8.

    Now Wilson drags a bad ankle into the Coliseum Sunday.

    “We’re preparing as if he’s going to be 100 percent,” Williams said. “We know how tough he is. He’s one of the few players who could come over and play defense. He does things on instinct, does things you can’t coach. He’s the best quarterback there is when it comes to extending plays.”

    The Rams allowed Wilson to run 15 times for 51 yards in those two games, with one gain of 20. They can live with that, provided they can find a way to squeeze Todd Gurley through Seattle’s front seven. “We might have to throw it deep to do that,” coach Jeff Fisher said, which invites its own problems.

    “We’ve been preaching the same thing for three years,” Ogletree said. “as far as becoming the best defense. We’re looking forward to this year and spreading our reputation around the league. We’re not looking to wait until next year to do that, because things change. What better time than now?”

    Sure beats someday.

    #53047
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams HC Fisher – September 15, 2016

    (Opening remarks)

    “A good day at practice, we got some guys back. We’re really excited. We have to finish up tomorrow strong and we’ll fine tune things on Saturday and then head down to the hotel and give it a shot. They’re a good football team, but we’ve had success against them and we have great respect for them, like I said. I’m pleased with where we are right now.”

    (On if he has decided if QB Jared Goff will be active on Sunday)

    “I haven’t decided yet, no. We’ll probably let you know tomorrow or Saturday or Sunday.”

    (On if this game is as big of a Week 2 game as he can remember)

    “Every week is big and there’s storylines behind everything. This is special because this is the first one that counts at the Coliseum, the first one that counts here at home. It’s special and we couldn’t think of a better opponent to open against. All the stuff with (Seahawks Head Coach) Pete (Carroll) coming back to the Coliseum for the first time, the little rivalry that we’ve established here over the last couple of years, I think it’s going to be special.”

    (On if the injuries to WR Nelson Spruce and WR Pharoh Cooper handcuff the offense)

    “You have to play through injures, that’s your philosophy. Who knows what would happen had they both been available – we don’t know. But we’ll find out when they come back. Other guys have to step up.”

    (On if Spruce and Cooper are close to playing)

    “They’re getting closer, yeah. They both did not practice today.”

    (On DT Michael Brockers’ contract extension and keeping the defensive line together)

    “Yeah, something about ‘Brock’ – I’m really excited about that. I appreciate (Owner/Chairman) Stan (Kroenke) and his willingness to allow us to go ahead and do that. We’ve been talking for quite some time about it. It’s important to keep our playmakers and people that we’ve drafted. We got a good deal for both sides and Michael is happy about it and so are we.”

    (On what Brockers brings to the defense)

    “He’s a big man inside and you have to have that nowadays for two reasons – one, for your ability to stop the inside run and two, to put pressure on the quarterback and collapse the pocket. He creates opportunities for everybody else and every so often he makes a big play himself. He’s been consistent week-in, week-out, he’s changed his body since his arrival, overcame some early career injuries and has just been one of those guys you can count on.”

    (On QB Case Keenum saying he needs trust himself more and if there is anything, going into the second game, that RB Todd Gurley needs to adjust)

    “No, I think we just need to be in a position where we can keep feeding him. The two are tied together – Case makes a good decision, converts a third down, then we get another opportunity to hand the ball off to Todd. It’s all tied together. Nothing really goes right when you struggle offensively on third down, you just don’t get the plays, you don’t get the shots. It just kind of debilitates your entire offense. We’d like to stay out of third downs – 15 last week was way too many – have anywhere (from) 10-to-12 max, that means you’re making chunks on first and second down and you’re moving the football.”

    (On what it means to the organization to be the team that comes back to the Los Angeles market)

    “It means a lot. Since the discussion started, all those things fall into place. It means a lot to us. Yeah, we’ve had a generation that’s been without it here. We want to, from a marketing standpoint and from a football standpoint, from a winning standpoint, attract their attention and get them behind us because that’s what storied franchises are all about and we expect this to last for a long time.”

    (On if he has any memories of the Rams wearing their royal blue and yellow throwback uniforms that they will be wearing on Sunday)

    “Well I have one in particular, but that didn’t work out very well for me (laughs). The players love them, they love the colors, they love the colors. I don’t know what our record is – you look at it – but they like playing in those uniforms. I think it’s a great way to open up.”

    (On how he thought T.J. McDonald responded after what he went through in the summer)

    “I’m really proud of T.J., what he overcame and the commitment that he made to conditioning prior to camp and the camp that he had and then the way he played in the opener. I’m really proud of him. He’s back. He’s back and he’s much better than he was.”

    (On if he was worried about McDonald at any point during the summer)

    “No, we were concerned with respect to the issues he was working through. But we stood behind him the whole time knowing that he would come back.”

    (On if the team can build off the success it has had against the Seahawks knowing that both teams are different this year)

    “No, as Pete told you guys yesterday, the past is the past. We’re starting over again. I can’t stand up in front of this team and say ‘Hey, we beat them twice last year.’ We did, but last year has no bearing on what we’re going to do this Sunday. We have to find a way to do it again.”

    (On the rumors of him signing a contract extension)

    “I never talk about my personal stuff or my extensions or non-extensions or anything. That’s between me and the organization.”

    (On how their preparation changes with Seahawks QB Russell Wilson having a high ankle sprain)

    “We’re preparing for a 100 percent healthy Russell. You have to do that or you sell yourself short. I thought their offensive staff, when he was injured, did a tremendous job adjusting the play-calling to allow him to find a way to win that game without using his legs. I thought they did a great job. We have to approach this, from a player standpoint and assume that he’s going to be 100 percent.”

    (On if coaches or uses the emotion in big games like on Sunday and if it’s realistic to say the team can channel the emotion in a positive way)

    “I think you have to be careful with emotions, especially as they relate to the start of games because you can lose your composure, you can lose track of your focus – those kind of things. Again, it was like last week (when) we talked about the only thing better than the season opener is a playoff game. The season opener itself is an emotional issue that players deal with. So you calm them down, then you add the Monday night thing, and you have to calm them down. Because we calmed them down, it wasn’t directly related to the way we played, but I think it’s important that you go out and use the crowd, use the emotion, but you have to use it wisely. I think that’s going to be a topic of discussion as we move through the weekend. The players, the defense has to understand that it’s going to be really difficult to communicate because it’s going to be extremely loud and that’s a good thing for us. Seattle has learned how to win at home with that, we have to learn how to win at home an extremely loud crowd.”

    ***

    Rams RB Todd Gurley – September 15, 2016

    (On if having a short week is better in regards to the team’s preparation for the next game)

    “Not really. We’re going to get a win this week, for sure. Not really, obviously, you want to have that extra day to prepare, but I just feel like after a loss like that, you’re just so ready to get back at it. We’re definitely ready to play Sunday.”

    (On the biggest takeaway from last week’s loss, that he can carry into this week)

    “Obviously, it can’t get much worse than zero points, so, no going back. It was a lot of good things, but obviously everybody has to be on the same page. Whether it’s me missing a blitz, or somebody coming through free. We just all have to be on the same page, do what the coaches tell us, and go out there and execute.”

    (On if there’s anything he needs to do different this weekend that he didn’t do last game)

    “Just stay with it, be patient. I felt like some of the runs got busted up a little early. I feel like I was trying to do too much, or wasn’t patient enough in my reads. I just got to stick to the game plan, and just know that everything is going to be fine, and we’re going to break one.”

    (On if he feels Seattle’s defense is game planned around stopping him)

    “They run a pretty simple defense. They’re going to run what they run, and they’re going to try and stop you. They’re going to have (S Kam) Chancellor down in the box. You have to respect a great player like himself. Just stick to my reads, stick to the game plan, know my assignments, and just go from there.”

    (On if he notices any changes in Seattle’s defense this year in comparison to last season)

    “Yeah definitely, definitely have a few more looks this year. But like I said, from the previous film of us playing them the past couple of years, they play what they play, and they’re just going to try to stop you.”

    (On his thought regarding the anticipation leading up to the home opener)

    “Obviously, we’re playing at the Coliseum; great tradition. I kind of treat it like college again; just glad that we’re back. A lot of people are excited for us to be back. There’s over millions of people in the city, so I’m pretty sure somebody wants to come watch football. Like I said, it’s just going to feel like college; that game day atmosphere, the love, football is back in L.A. Hopefully we can just get this win for the city.”

    (On if seeing himself on billboards around the city is a surreal moment for him)

    “Yeah, it’s still mind blowing that we’re here, but we can’t let that be our focus. Just try to execute, stay to the game plan, stay focused on football, and just try to go out there and win. Obviously, being in the media capital of the world, you see stuff like that. It’s definitely a good look for us, and for the Rams.”

    (On what it means for him to represent the new generation of L.A. fans who never got a taste of the Rams)

    “It’s cool man. It’s a blessing just to be in this league. Whether you’re on the Rams or not, I feel like NFL players appreciate that. For fans that buy our jerseys, and come support us, we’re just excited to be here, play in this league, and play for this team, and this city.”

    #52659
    sdram
    Participant

    I honestly believe SK is not that superficial. The LA press maybe, but not SK.

    I think Stan and staff expect Fisher will win. And, I guess I don’t see that as superficial at all. How much is enough seems to be the unknown to me. Fisher has had four years of building from scratch with extenuating circumstances certainly – roster was weak, injuries, Bradford’s contract and health, and the move back to LA. So how long will Stan be patient? It’s been four years already – longer than anybody I can think of in recent history.

    Fisher has done some great things building a depleted roster. He seems pragmatic and willing to change with the times. I kind of like his style. He’s an LA guy at heart like me. But head coaches get paid to win IMO, so we’ll see.

    #52545
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams QB Jared Goff must learn to be a backup

    Vincent Bonsignore

    http://www.dailynews.com/sports/20160909/vincent-bonsignore-rams-qb-jared-goff-must-learn-to-be-a-backup

    THOUSAND OAKS >> The starting point is nowhere near were Jared Goff originally imagined. In that respect, he’s no different than anyone else. The Rams included.

    If anyone says they would have predicted or anticipated or been OK with the first overall pick starting his NFL career at the back of the Rams quarterback line, they’re either lying or not in the loop.

    Goff was generally regarded as the most National Football League quarterback available in last April’s draft, and that wasn’t an opinion exclusive to the Rams.

    Off that distinction, he separated himself from the rest of the quarterback group and the Rams built their justification to trade six picks to the Tennessee Titans to move from the 15th pick to the first pick overall to take Goff over North Dakota State’s Carson Wentz.

    So to say there isn’t even a hint of disappointment that Goff didn’t distinguish himself as the second-string quarterback, let alone the starter, would be disingenuous.

    “My whole life, I’ve been the starter,” Goff said.

    Now he’s third string. And that takes some getting used to.

    For everyone.

    Instead of returning home to the Bay Area the starting quarterback of the Los Angeles Rams, he’ll be standing on the sideline in street clothes.

    Instead of preparing for the season opener against the San Francisco 49ers, he’s focused on a long-range plan that will eventually lift him from the raw prospect he looked like during training camp to the player everyone assumed he’d rapidly be upon the Rams taking him with the first overall pick.

    It’s about having faith in the process rather than trusting this week’s game plan.

    “And there is a process,” Goff said. “You’re just going to trust the process, and know that it’s all going to work out.”

    He said this with conviction in his voice. But more and more the conversation about Goff is based on hope rather than certainty.

    Based on how he performed during training camp and the preseason, it’s all we really have.

    Yes, the Rams preached patience with Goff going all the way back to their pre-draft evaluation of him. And in talking to the former Cal Golden Bear, Rams coach Jeff Fisher was up front that getting him on the field could be swift or a prolonged ordeal.

    “He talked about if (prolonged) was the case, there will be no rushing,” Goff said. “Whenever it’s time, it’s time. If it needs to happen early, it happens early. If it needs to happen a little bit later, it happens later. I’m just going to continue to trust him and to trust the process, and know that they have a really well thought-out plan in place, and I’m still a part of it.”

    But completion of that plan seems so much further away than anyone could have imagined.

    And that’s disappointing considering the home run swing the Rams took to acquire Goff.

    It was move made for reasons both obvious and subtle.

    No question they wanted to make a bold first step back into the Los Angeles market, and it doesn’t get much grander than trading for the first overall pick and grabbing a future face of the franchise at the most important position on the field.

    Just as importantly, in talking to Rams folks, there is a sincere belief they are inches away from taking that next step in the growth process rather than feet. Closing that gap was predicated primarily on better quarterback play.

    With one mighty swing of the bat, they felt they achieved both objectives.

    Nothing like making a bold move to stir up the second-biggest market in the country.

    And nothing like adding a dynamic new quarterback to carry the team to the next level.

    That didn’t happen, obviously.

    Goff performed through training camp and preseason like a prospect still in need of major seasoning. Without the benefit of the minor leagues for more fine tuning, he’ll toil away behind the scenes trying to get up to speed.

    To the untrained eye, Goff looks at least a year away from making a significant contribution. That goes for his level of play to his physical stature. He’s every bit the 6-foot-5 he’s listed. But 205 pounds never looked skinnier stretched over his lanky frame.

    Meanwhile, starter Case Keenum and second-year man Sean Mannion significantly out-played Goff. So when the Rams drew up their depth chart for Monday night’s season opener, there was no justification to elevate Goff over the two veterans.

    Discouraging.

    But prudent.

    And for the kid for whom so much was expected, about as humbling as you can imagine.

    His name was called first overall among 253 players drafted last April.

    But no telling when his named will be called upon.

    Nobody had that in the script.

    “I’m just going to be patient, wait until my number is called, and continue to get ready out on the field, and continue to practice as hard as I can,” Goff said. “When my number is called, be ready.”

    Goff’s NFL future pretty much depends on it.

    His ability to process and compartmentalize what can only be deemed a set back and learn and grow and emerge better for it are the keys to everything.

    And he’ll have to do it as much mentally as he does physically.

    With practice time cut down in the NFL over the years and reps at a premium for the starter and back up, third-string quarterbacks get precious few chances to get snaps during the course of the week. So Goff will have to rely on his eyes and ears watching Keenum and Mannion almost as much as his legs and arm.

    “Just continue to learn and take mental reps,” he said. “I’ve never done it before, so I am learning how to do that as well. Just trying to try to learn from what they do well, and then learn from their mistakes. Case has been in the league for a long time now. I just pick his brain and ask him as much as I can, and get to know as much as I can before my number is called, so I can be ready.”

    When that time comes is anyone’s guess.

    #52527
    — X —
    Participant

    It would help if Fisher never gave mixed signals about what his intentions were with Goff. Early in the process he said the goal was to start him Monday night. Then it was “We’re gonna be patient with him.” Like others, I could give a rip about what the media says or perceives the situation to be. And there are some really *out there* theories about Goff being inactive.

    When he’s ready, he’s ready. Fisher didn’t really give him the opportunities afforded a QB who was expected to contribute right away, so it’s really no surprise that he isn’t ready yet. That said, it was kind of weird of Fisher to say that he wants Goff to kind of ‘absorb’ what NFL football is about on Monday. Take it all in, get a feel for the environment and whatnot. That’s just weird. It’s like showing a kid a documentary about Disneyland before taking him to Disneyland. The whole time the kid’s like, “Yeah, I assume it’s going to be exciting and a little scary, so this documentary is kind of useless — and you’re stupid.”

    You have to be odd, to be number one.
    -- Dr Seuss

Viewing 30 results - 541 through 570 (of 943 total)