Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Miklasz: It’s Now or Never
- This topic has 16 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by rfl.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 24, 2015 at 9:04 am #32854znModerator
No Excuses For Rams: It’s Now or Never
Bernie Miklasz
http://www.101sports.com/2015/10/23/no-excuses-for-rams-its-now-or-never/
Really, coach Jeff Fisher and the Rams are way, way overdue in putting together a winning stretch of football. There have been too many false starts for this regime, and I’m not talking about the usual jumpy offensive linemen and their penalties.
Every time the Rams win a game, you start to think that this will be it. Finally: the beginning of consistent, dependable, successful football and proof that they’re headed in a positive direction. And then … sigh … the Rams squander a game they should win and walk backwards again.
Well, the any reasonable degree of patience expired a long time ago. By the fourth season of the Fisher and GM Les Snead rebuilding project, the Rams should be more than just another mid-pack team, sitting there at 2-3. No one wants to hear about the youth of the team, or the inexperienced offensive line, or the injuries. If this is the NFL’s youngest team for the fourth year in a row, it’s because Fisher and Snead wanted it that way. If the young O-line gets overrun too often, that’s on Fisher-Snead for declining to put a more experienced group in charge of protecting quarterback Nick Foles. And injuries? Give me the name of one NFL team that hasn’t been damaged by injuries.
In his first 32 games as the Rams head coach, Fisher went 14-17-1, a winning percentage of .453 that ranked 20th in the NFL over the 2012-2013 seasons. Considering that he’d taken over a smashed pumpkin of a franchise that had lost 65 of the previous 80 games, Fisher’s first two seasons were respectable.
By Fisher’s third season, 2014, the Rams should have been on a more impressive trajectory. Yes, even with the knee injuries that put QB Sam Bradford out of action. (Could we please stop pretending that the Rams would have gone on some dynamic, unstoppable run with a healthy Bradford at QB?) Instead, since the start of the 2014 season the Rams are 8-13, a winning percentage of .381 that ranks tied for 25th in the league.
Let’s see:
A .453 winning percentage in your first two seasons and 32 games.
And a .381 winning percentage over the next 21 games covering all of 2014 and the first five contests of ’15.
When you rebuild a football team, isn’t it supposed to be getting better? I’ve only been covering the NFL since 1982, but that’s my understanding.
By Year Four whatever is supposed to be happening — winning streaks, division titles, a wild-card playoff spot, some postseason victories, and dare we say a conference championship or Super Bowl — should be happening. No one is asking Fisher to build the Great Pyramids here, so he doesn’t get 20+ years to complete the project.
It’s time — no, it’s beyond time — for the Rams to win more than a football game or two per month.
I looked at the Fisher record on a individual monthly basis. Not counting the current month, the Rams have played 13 separate months of football with Fisher in charge. And they’ve had only three winning months out of 13. And each winning month came in a different season: the final month of 2012, November 2013 and Nov. 2014. That’s it. And each winning month was followed (naturally) by a losing month.
Fisher had a three-game winning streak late in his first season here, but hasn’t been able to repeat it. He’s had five mini-winning streaks — two games — since the start of the 2013 season.
Here’s the good news — well, at least on paper:
Home game vs. Cleveland.
Home game vs. San Francisco.
Road game at Minnesota.
Home game vs. Chicago.
Road game at Baltimore.
There will be other invitations to string together wins later in the season, including consecutive home games that bring Detroit and Tampa Bay to St. Louis. But for now I just wanted to put the focus on the next five games, and not look too far into the distance. Because if the Rams stumble around and lose when they should win and fail to significantly take advantage of the next five games on their schedule, the rest of the season will be just another extension of 2012, 2013, 2014.
Cleveland, San Francisco, Minnesota, Chicago and Baltimore are a combined 10-20 this season.
A quick look at the next five opponents:
— Cleveland has a good offense but ranks 24th in points allowed and is the league’s worst defense at stopping the run, plundered for an average yield of 150 yards rushing per game. The Rams have a young line — but a massive line. The Rams also have the most exceptional and exciting Todd Gurley to give this offense a new identity. These people should be able to run block, right? They did it in junior league, high school and college football, correct? We’re not asking this O-line to split the atom; just split the Browns’ defensive front and give Gurley a cutback lane. This is Football 101, so I don’t want to hear a damned thing about how the Browns were doing this, doing that, making it difficult for the Rams to set Gurley free.
— San Francisco still puts a respectable defense on the field but the offense is last in the NFL in points per game (14.7) and 31st in yards per game. The ‘Niners have lost five of their last six games, getting outscored by 99 points in those five defeats. QB Colin Kaepernick is near the bottom of the league in passer rating. Jim Harbaugh is coaching Michigan. Frank Gore is running the ball for Indianapolis. Much of that once-ferocious defense has retired, been suspended, or splintered by free agency.
— Minnesota does have a winning record (3-2), and is 3-0 at home. But two of the home wins came against two of the league’s sorriest teams in 2015, Detroit and Kansas City. And while the Vikings have played very well defensively so far, their offense has sputtered — ranked 29th in points per game (19.2) and 30th in yards per game. If the Rams’ defense is as good as just about everybody says it is, then Gregg Williams’ wolf pack is surely capable of winning a game or two during this stretch if the Rams’ offense drifts and stalls.
— Chicago is 1-2 on the road, lost at Detroit, and fields a defense that ranks dead last in the league in points allowed (30 per game) and is 27th at stopping the run. Plus: Jay Cutler is the Bears’ quarterback and if Robert Quinn and his merry marauders can’t rattle Cutler then they should donate their game checks to charity.
— Baltimore is one of the biggest surprises of the season, but not in a way that delights my old bunkies in Bawlmer. The Ravens are 1-5 and have lost their teeth defensively, getting pushed around by opponents for an average of 27 points per game, which ranks 27th.
There’s another important aspect to this five-game stretch: the Fisher’s Rams need to collect wins away from the NFC West mosh pit. The Rams have been plenty tough against NFC West brethren Seattle, San Francisco and Arizona, going 9-10-1 with Fisher as coach. But outside the division, the Fisher record is 13-20-1.
That’s awful. That needs to change. Now. Four of the next five games will be played beyond the borders of the gates of the NFC West. If the Rams want to pull themselves out of mediocrity and become a winning team and a postseason presence, it’s time … it’s past time.
October 24, 2015 at 9:04 am #32827nittany ramModeratorNo Excuses For Rams: It’s Now or Never
Bernie Miklasz
Could we please stop pretending that the Rams would have gone on some dynamic, unstoppable run with a healthy Bradford at QB?
Oh Bernie, you knucklehead, you.
Do you really think a healthy Sam Bradford wouldn’t have had a significant impact on the Rams’ record the past couple of seasons? Really? There were plenty of games there for the taking but for a lack of a competent QB.
October 24, 2015 at 9:28 am #32828AgamemnonParticipantOh Bernie, you knucklehead, you.
Do you really think a healthy Sam Bradford wouldn’t have had a significant impact on the Rams’ record the past couple of seasons? Really? There were plenty of games there for the taking but for a lack of a competent QB.Just before this, Bernie had been ranting over the radio about how no one really appreciated how good a coach Fisher was. It was only he who could see it. He mentioned the 5 year stretch between 1999-2003 and how the Titans were tied with the Rams for the best record in football.
In reality, Bernie is really a Big TROLL and should be banned. imo 😉
October 24, 2015 at 1:46 pm #32838InvaderRamModeratorOh Bernie, you knucklehead, you.
Do you really think a healthy Sam Bradford wouldn’t have had a significant impact on the Rams’ record the past couple of seasons? Really? There were plenty of games there for the taking but for a lack of a competent QB.Just before this, Bernie had been ranting over the radio about how no one really appreciated how good a coach Fisher was. It was only he who could see it. He mentioned the 5 year stretch between 1999-2003 and how the Titans were tied with the Rams for the best record in football.
In reality, Bernie is really a Big TROLL and should be banned. imo
hahahahaha!
this!
- This reply was modified 9 years ago by InvaderRam.
- This reply was modified 9 years ago by zn.
October 25, 2015 at 9:35 am #32856znModerator(Could we please stop pretending that the Rams would have gone on some dynamic, unstoppable run with a healthy Bradford at QB?)
Nittany’s right. Yeah cause what everyone said and believed was that they would go on an UNSTOPPABLE RUN.
Actually what most people asserted was that they would be better. Better, at any rate, than a team that starting 2 back-up qbs including one who got benched and then later cut.
And of course there’s the great neglected theme of all Rams discussions. The OL was a mess starting in training camp (with both Long and Wells missing time). Then got worse when Long went out, GR shifted his green on the job training self to LOT, Wells and Saffold both played hurt, and they had to start Joseph.
Given all that it is actually reasonable to say they would have done better if the starting qb
October 25, 2015 at 10:21 am #32866wvParticipantWell, I ‘translate’ Bernie’s column to mean,
If they dont win today they aint makin the playoffs — again.So, i basically agree
with my own-interpretation of what Bernie said.Its basically a must-win as far as this year’s playoffs go.
Its not a must-win as far as improving, or ‘making a run’
or being a spoiler or setting up year FIVE, etc, etc, and so forth.They need to be intense, motivated,
hit hard, play their asses off. And They need to win.And then they need to do it all again next week.
w
vOctober 25, 2015 at 10:26 am #32868znModeratorThey need to be intense, motivated,
hit hard, play their asses off. And They need to win.You make sense, Miklasz doesn’t. I don’t think you translated him, I think you hit re-set and overwrote him.
Cause, you know, 2001: A Space Odyssey is not Plan 9 From Outer Space, just cleaned up a bit.
October 25, 2015 at 10:38 am #32870wvParticipantThey need to be intense, motivated,
hit hard, play their asses off. And They need to win.You make sense, Miklasz doesn’t. I don’t think you translated him, I think you hit re-set and overwrote him.
Cause, you know, 2001: A Space Odyssey is not Plan 9 From Outer Space, just cleaned up a bit.
================
Well, honestly, that’s how my brain
deals with people like Bernie,
routinely.My brain goes “well, this is what he probly meant.”
And I like the ending of Plan9
better than 2001’s ending,
btw.w
vOctober 25, 2015 at 10:51 am #32873znModeratorI like the ending of Plan9
better than 2001’s ending,
btw.Not sure what has to do with Miklasz.
October 25, 2015 at 10:56 am #32875wvParticipantOctober 25, 2015 at 11:51 am #32878znModeratorell, my own interpretation of what you just wrote
is, “wv ram, you are even more brilliant
than Hal, the computer on 2001.”So should we call you “Daisy”?
October 25, 2015 at 12:22 pm #32882rflParticipantAnd of course there’s the great neglected theme of all Rams discussions.
How about another neglected theme in these discussions:
The fact that, with the QBs and OL you mention, the Rams lost games from winning positions 3-4 times last year. Often because the defense broke down.
As I have said about 100 times, I don’t hold last year’s team responsible for a given W/L record.
I do hold them responsible for playing tough, competitive football from week to week. Hell, from quarter to quarter. You want people to remember the OL? How about you remembering the roller coaster of competitive performances or the fact that WITH THOSE QBS AND OL THEY STILL WERE IN POSITION TO WIN ANOTHER 3-4 GAMES? Can we remember that, too?
And you know what? Bernie is perfectly correct. Fisher lost 1 key player last year. But he fielded a team frequently unready to play competitive football. Including a defense with superb and healthy talent. Including the debacle of the NYG game right after the big shut out performances. He has never yet shown that he can lead the Rams to anything like consistent competitive performance. Losing Sam and having some turmoil on the OL does not alter that fact.
- This reply was modified 9 years ago by rfl.
By virtue of the absurd ...
October 25, 2015 at 12:26 pm #32884ZooeyModeratorMiklasz to me is not a journalist. He’s a poster who gets paid. And I don’t have a problem with that. Sometimes he’s interesting. And, sure, he is often annoying. But I don’t expect anything more from him after all these years, and that’s just how I approach him. He’s just STLHomer with an Arch avatar. Ya know, cool.
October 25, 2015 at 12:37 pm #32887znModeratorAnd of course there’s the great neglected theme of all Rams discussions.
How about another neglected theme in these discussions:
The fact that, with the QBs and OL you mention, the Rams lost games from winning positions 3-4 times last year. Often because the defense broke down.
We’re just thinking of different things. By neglected themes in Rams discussions, I mean going back years. this is an old old issue of mine and it goes back to several coaches, GMS, and owners ago. I was debating people about the effects of extensive OL injuries back in 2007, when they lost 10 linemen to injury (4 for the season) yet some were blaming Bulger for the losses. It—meaning neglecting the effects of multiple simultantaneous OL injuries— hasn’t gotten much better since. It’s just like Miklasz to completely overlook that kind of thing, again.
In terms of the defense, to me that’s a standard issue problem—new coordinator, system changes, adjustment period. I contend that if they at least had Bradford and a relatively healthy OL in 2014, they would have won more anyway.
For example I said last year that if the cut back on the communication issues and breakdowns that led to big scores last year, the D would automatically improve. They did, it did.
So I don’t think anyone forgets or doesn’t realize the defense took a while to get going. I just don’t think they all interpret that fact the same way you do.
October 25, 2015 at 12:38 pm #32888PA RamParticipantI DO think it’s now or never. I just can’t imagine this team coming out with a clunker today. What would that say about them? If this becomes another Washington game, I just don’t know. If not now, when? If not them, who? If not how, why? If not why, where?
Besides, I’ve got 10 bucks riding in my survivor pool.
If they lose this game I can’t see them making the playoffs or having a winning record. If they lose this game I’m not sure what I see. 2 weeks to prepare, out of the bye–a weaker team AT home. I don’t know what excuse could be made.
Gotta win!
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
October 25, 2015 at 12:44 pm #32889znModeratorI just can’t imagine this team coming out with a clunker today. What would that say about them?
And if they have a winning season anyway it won’t say anything about them.
It’s funny to me how these conversations go. The Rams often beat teams they shouldn’t. Does that say anything about the teams they beat?
It;s the NFL, teams lose sometimes when they shouldn’t.
Fact is until 2014, Rams won more of those games than they lost.
October 25, 2015 at 12:53 pm #32890rflParticipantIt’s just like Miklasz to completely overlook that kind of thing, again.
In terms of the defense, to me that’s a standard issue problem—new coordinator, system changes, adjustment period.
And who made the decision to basically hold the DC spot for Williams, bring him back after the defense should have already gelled, and then let Williams run the guys out in ultra-complex packages with unsound deployments?
I think that would be Fisher. He COULD have hired a good DC in ’12 and by last year the D would have been a settled and talented unit.
He didn’t. He’s responsible for “Year III” being, again, a time of adjustment.
As for it being “just like Miklasz to forget,” well, I don’t think he is the only observer who has patterns of amnesia.
By virtue of the absurd ...
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.