Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,201 through 1,230 (of 3,612 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Maher on the Republican party #86980
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    thing that still baffles me is why so many people trust Trump and the GOP. I understand perfectly saying FU to the Dems. But it’s just not logical to choose Trump and the GOP as a champion of truth and anti-corruption. If the issue is a lack of trust for any political party, shouldn’t it be both of the majors? Or, if it’s “government” in general, both parties too?

    =====================

    Well, i guess at some point people just decide to believe in something. I mean, how in the world do people believe Alex Jones? How do people believe in Lizard-People? How do people believe Trump? Hitler? On and on.

    I think Lie-Factories and Dirty-Rotten-Systems just…damage people. And damaged-people are prone to latch on to anything, Fascism, Trumpism, anything. Humans iz dangerous.

    w
    v

    Trump is restoring “white” to its proper place at the top of the social/economic hierarchy.

    All other considerations are secondary to that.

    Not that it wasn’t already there. It’s always been there. His supporters just think it wasn’t. They view equality as oppression.

    in reply to: Needed Now: A Real and Radical Left #86952
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Evolutionary psychology tries to explain modern behaviors in evolutionary terms.

    For example, they might explain the behavior of kissing as originating as way for our ancestors to determine the relative health of a potential mate. The problem is this hypothesis is untestable, and there are other ways to explain why kissing may have evolved. This is one reason why evolutionary psychology is widely criticized. But it does have its supporters too.

    in reply to: the never ending "Donald's really good" thread #86934
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    As I’ve heard mentioned elsewhere, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Rams and Donald already have a handshake agreement. The Rams just need to free up cap space…maybe by cutting Barron.
    They had to wait until June 1st to cut him but now they can save $7 million in cap space, if they choose to go that route.

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: Needed Now: A Real and Radical Left #86924
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Here is an answer to your question WV.

    ‘Why don’t we just copy the Canadians?’ is because we can’t. We’re not Canadian and we don’t share the same history or the same social ethos.’”

    I don’t buy that. It’s not because we are so culturely different; it’s because the US has been so propagandized that anything socialist is bad, and single payer is largely portrayed as socialist by the powers that be. It’s not culture – it’s a relatively small group of people who got rich off the current healthcare system, and therefore have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. IMO that’s what’s keeping us from having single payer. If you describe the benefits of single payer to most Americans and they are all for it. It’s not until you call it single payer that they turn up their noses.

    I don’t know. I thought the article -like many from Wharton that I read-was fairly even handed. I think the point was that we are so ingrained in our health care system and we are so big and divergent in our views that it would almost be impossible to change to a universal system at this point. Maybe an infusion of universal care to some degree but to radically change to an entirely different model just won’t work. There may be a point in that. It may also be that there may not be any bad guys in this. Only that this nation has evolved in this system unlike any other. Its not the bad guys overpowering the good guys. Its never quite that simple.

    I agree that the problem is incredibly complicated.

    But at its core is a group of people who are ok with millions of Americans not having healthcare. They are ok with it because they profit from it. And these people do everything possible to maintain the system that keeps millions of Americans from having it. There’s no getting around that. So I disagree about there not being bad people at the root of this. To me, that’s akin to saying there are no ‘bad’ people in the tobacco industry.

    in reply to: Needed Now: A Real and Radical Left #86912
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Here is an answer to your question WV.

    ‘Why don’t we just copy the Canadians?’ is because we can’t. We’re not Canadian and we don’t share the same history or the same social ethos.’”

    I don’t buy that. It’s not because we are so culturely different; it’s because the US has been so propagandized that anything socialist is bad, and single payer is largely portrayed as socialist by the powers that be. It’s not culture – it’s a relatively small group of people who got rich off the current healthcare system, and therefore have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. IMO that’s what’s keeping us from having single payer. If you describe the benefits of single payer to most Americans and they are all for it. It’s not until you call it single payer that they turn up their noses.

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: Needed Now: A Real and Radical Left #86896
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Plus of course single payer works all over the world in different places and has for decades. Including Canada and Scandanavia.

    The thing that CAN’T be justified, IMO, is paying for private insurance companies who make a profit and have high administrative overhead on top of it. That’s as much as 10 times greater the administrative costs than public systems and of course not a dime of that goes toward health care.

    There are many reasons doctors are for single payer.

    And no country that has single payer is in the process of dismantling it in favor of a privatized system, although more and more of England’s NHS is becoming privatized. But as a result they are already seeing huge inequalities in care based on socioeconomic status.

    in reply to: Needed Now: A Real and Radical Left #86893
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    FYI for anyone interested….

    Waterfield is partially correct when he says single payer failed in Vermont because of costs. However, the Vermont plan excluded large businesses from participating. Therefore, a huge source of funding was lost from the beginning. Plus, they never figured out what to do with people who were already on federal Medicare/Medicaid. For these reasons, one could argue that what Vermont was trying to implement wasn’t really single payer anyway, so their experience cannot really be used as an “I told you so” by the anti-single payer crowd.

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: why don't the national media guys see Goff coming? #86817
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    They’re all focused on Jimmy G, the new Oracle of the NFL. With seven starts under his belt.

    Seriously. Especially here in the BA. To them, he’s the second coming of Christ.

    Count me among those who hope he crashes and burns.

    And I would like someone to make a video montage of random 9’ers fans’ faces as they watch it happen.

    in reply to: Roseanne #86816
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: Vitamins are useless for the most part #86813
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    …all i know iz, when i take my multivitamins, my finger-nails grow faster.
    So they are doing ‘something’ inside my body.

    w
    v

    Until you provide results from a meta-analysis of double-blinded, randomized controlled studies on the effect of multi-vitamins on your fingernail growth, I’m going to assume that statement is a lie.

    in reply to: Surfing #86753
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    It’s like surfing a tsunami.

    No thanks.

    My foray into water sports is limited to paddling around ponds, lakes, and bays in a $200.00 kayak from Dick’s Sporting Goods and looking at birds – which I do a lot, but there’s more danger in an unattended paper cut.

    in reply to: Giuliani admits "Spygate" is PR to ward off impeachment #86744
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Economic growth through the first quarter of 2018.

    Why do so many people think Trump is having such a positive effect on the economy?

    https://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdp_glance.htm

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    To keep all this in perspective…

    Ss

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Poll: NFL fans overwhelmingly support league’s national anthem policy

    I wouldn’t call it “overwhelming”.

    53% of NFL fans support it. That means 47% don’t. To me that’s a small majority. I actually expected it to be a much bigger percentage.

    in reply to: Jason Whitlock on Fox #86719
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I haven’t watched ESPN in years.

    It’s just so easy to get all the sports info you want off the internet, including ESPN.com.

    If I want info on a particular story I can find in-depth coverage of it from a variety of sites in a few minutes.

    It’s a waste of time to watch ESPN for the sports news.

    in reply to: zooey #86694
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    All the best to BillyT and zooey.

    in reply to: informal poll: which 2 out of 3 #86546
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I would never want to give up Gurley, but Donald may be the best DT of all time. As great as Gurley is, I also think Donald has a bigger impact on a game.

    So Goff and Donald.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Jets taking a different approach:http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/23585906/new-york-jets-ceo-discourage-players-kneeling-nfl-new-anthem-policy

    “…..Despite a unanimously approved league policy that requires players to stand if they’re on the field during the national anthem, New York Jets CEO Christopher Johnson said Wednesday he won’t discourage players from kneeling even if it results in the club being fined by the NFL.

    “As I have in the past, I will support our players wherever we land as a team,” Johnson said in a statement, adding that he intends to meet with coach Todd Bowles and the players to discuss the league’s decision. “Our focus is not on imposing any club rules, fines or restrictions.”..see link

    The Jets just became my second favorite team.

    in reply to: Man has eradicated the majority of life on Earth #86474
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    dd

    in reply to: Here's the problem -as I see it #86334
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Yeah, a lot of where the credit is placed will depend on which side does the better job of spinning.

    My thoughts are North Korea isn’t coming to the bargaining table because of Trump. They’re coming now because they finally have something to bargain with; ie, a middle that can strike a part of the US. Trump is going to take credit and probably will be able to convince a lot of voters that he is responsible for NK’s willingness to negotiate. However, Trump has said that he is looking for full nuclear disarmament in the part of NK. NK has said that ain’t gonna happen. So I’m not convinced any deal is gonna be struck anytime soon.

    Trump is getting credit for creating jobs but job growth in his first year lags behind Obama’s last 4 years. Trump is trying to take credit for the improved economy but it could be argued that what’s happening with the economy is just a continuation of what was happening during Obama’s second term. But the picture isn’t all rosey as many companies are laying off workers or moving operations overseas despite the tax breaks. And as you said there’s still a dearth if good paying jobs. Many people are under employed. The economy isn’t as healthy as Trump likes to claim, but I think his supporters believe it is and convincing them otherwise will be a challenge.

    I agree with all of that, Nittany.

    I’m really not seeing what Trump has done to help the economy at all. Deregulation doesn’t do that. Privatization doesn’t do that. Tax cuts for the rich doesn’t do that. Unless by “the economy” people mean just Ownership/CEOs, and not workers and consumers. And the deregulation and privatization is definitely killing the planet.

    No workers have benefited from the Trump/GOP agenda. In fact, they’ve all be hurt by it. Less safe in the workplace. Less secure in their jobs. It’s now much easier for companies to export jobs, reduce benefits, pay less. Trump and the GOP have helped Capital tremendously. But not Labor, and they’ve been devastating to the environment.

    Yeah, the fairest and most economically sound way for capitalism to work is to tax the rich more and to pay workers more. That’s what is happening in Minnesota and California and their economies are booming. That’s the strategy the entire country should be using. Trump’s plan of shifting the burden of taxation from the rich and massively deregulating corporations isn’t sustainable and any temporary economic gains come at the expense of the poor and working class.

    in reply to: Here's the problem -as I see it #86328
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    There is a shift in the political wind. It’s happening. I don’t know how big it is, but it’s underway. And not just because Trump is a jerk, but…because of his policies.

    I don’t want to sound like a Trump supporter because…well gag me.

    But there’s a ton of positive stuff happening for Trump right now.

    The North Korea talks and reconciliation with South Korea is amazing. Before those developments there seemed to be murmurings in the MSN about Trump’s incompetence leading to a nuclear showdown. Now peace seems to be on the horizon.

    Again, I hate the guy, and wonder how much–if any–credit he deserves for this development. But you know he will take credit for resolving the problem. And millions of Americans will accept that and give him credit.

    Jobs, jobs, jobs. The economy keeps adding jobs. Manufacturing has added 245,000 jobs going back to last April. Again, Trump will attribute this growth to his tax cuts and take credit.

    I suspect people who are now working and making more money won’t argue with him.

    Mining industries have added 86,000 jobs since last April. Do you think that growth would have occurred with anyone besides a Republican?

    Trump appears to be actually fighting and working for American manufacturing jobs. I know your no fan of Obama, but I can’t recall Obama doing much to defend and support American manufacturiong.

    (All this info comes from the bureau of labor and statistics. Just google “job reports”)

    When I read the tea leaves I don’t see much positive apart from the Mueller investigation. We’ll see, but I’m not hopeful.

    Yeah, a lot of where the credit is placed will depend on which side does the better job of spinning.

    My thoughts are North Korea isn’t coming to the bargaining table because of Trump. They’re coming now because they finally have something to bargain with; ie, a missle that can strike a part of the US. Trump is going to take credit and probably will be able to convince a lot of voters that he is responsible for NK’s willingness to negotiate. However, Trump has said that he is looking for full nuclear disarmament on the part of NK. NK has said that ain’t gonna happen. So I’m not convinced any deal is gonna be struck anytime soon.

    Trump is getting credit for creating jobs but job growth in his first year lags behind Obama’s last 4 years. Trump is trying to take credit for the improved economy but it could be argued that what’s happening with the economy is just a continuation of what was happening during Obama’s second term. But the picture isn’t all rosey as many companies are laying off workers or moving operations overseas despite the tax breaks. And as you said there’s still a dearth if good paying jobs. Many people are under employed. The economy isn’t as healthy as Trump likes to claim, but I think his supporters believe it is and convincing them otherwise will be a challenge.

    in reply to: Here's the problem -as I see it #86323
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    We have far better and more accurate ways of identifying people in need today than 50 years ago. I say that’s a good thing not a bad thing.

    Maybe that explains the growing safety net, but I don’t thinks so.

    The amount the US pays for SNAP has tripled since 2000 and doubled since 2007. Our ability to identify people who need help hasn’t grown that much since 2007.

    I’ve not investigated this, but I’d guess we’d find the same trend for WIC, EIC, Medicaid, etc.

    I would guess the increasing cost of helping poor people can be linked to Wal-Mart and McDonald’s trends in America. Instead of decent paying full time jobs, people now are forced to work at Wal Mart and make 10 bucks an hour.

    As a result, Wal Mart owners and execs are billionaires and millionaires while the US tallies a bigger and bigger debt for my kids’ future in order to save poor people from abject poverty.

    I think Bernie might have put forth a version of this argument in 2016.

    The social safety net is a mere pittance compared to the safety net afforded corporations through subsidies, etc; ie, corporate welfare.

    ss

    in reply to: Thirry replaces Gonzalez as Rams espn writer #86248
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I wonder if she’ll continue to do the Fearsome Twosome podcast with Gary Klein?

    As far as Rams podcasts go, it was one of the better ones. Not because they brought a lot of knowledge to the podcast – because they didn’t, but because it was broadcast from the Rams practice facilities and therefore they often had impromptu visits with Rams coaches and players.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    If they stay healthy this is a Super Bowl contender. Anything less than a Super Bowl might even be a disappointment.

    *If they stay healthy.*

    The Rams have been the least injured team two years in a row. Maybe they will stay relatively injury free for three straight years?

    The chance of a coin coming up heads three straight times is 12.5%. Yeah, I know the coin analogy doesn’t really fit but my point is that they are unlikely to be the healthiest team in the league three straight years.

    So, most likely the Rams are in for a statistical reality check.

    But how healthy do they have to be?

    This is a deep team. I think they could weather an injury to a few key players with just a couple exceptions.

    As long as they don’t experience Spagnuolo era level injuries, the Rams should contend.

    in reply to: Grading the Los Angeles Rams 2018 NFL Draft #86150
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    NFL Insiders predict: The most improved team in 2018

    Matt Bowen, NFL writer: Los Angeles Rams.

    in reply to: caitlin johnstone:"facebook is throttling my articles" #86093
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    “We had to protect against FaceBook censorship by going into SETTINGS … and ticking the box to SEE Bartlett’s posts FIRST.”

    This does work, btw.

    in reply to: Ray McGovern brutalized by police #86052
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: Rams newest reporter #86005
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Whatever happened to that last reporter they had? Dani Whattshername?

    Dani Klupenger. No one knows what happened to her.

    Do you suspect foul play?

    in reply to: Some sobering news from Jim Fadler #86004
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Although I don’t know him personally, from what I do know I can say there are few better people than Jim Fadler.

    I wish him the best.

    in reply to: every team's longest run in the Super Bowl era #85981
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    3 or 4 of the longest plays came against the vaunted Jags defense.

Viewing 30 posts - 1,201 through 1,230 (of 3,612 total)