Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1,141 through 1,170 (of 3,612 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: ravens game reactions + articles & tweets #89253
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: reaction to alex jones bein banned #89208
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Anybody got any opinions on whether it was a good idea to ban the loathesome-disgusting-weasel Alex Jones?

    w
    v

    I go back and forth on it. I understand Camp’s point that banning Jones may have opened a door to the banning of leftist sites like Redacted Tonight. On the other hand the collective IQ of the country went up 30 points the minute after it happened.

    And besides, that could happen anyway, Jones or no Jones, right? Facebook, Youtube, etc are all privately owned companies. They have a right to determine what content is suitable for their sites. And the content policies change depending on which way the wind is blowing. Facebook has a content policy that one could argue Jones has been violating for years. Some might ask why has it taken this long for Facebook to ban him.

    And of course Jones is free to start his own social media platform. I’m surprised he didn’t already have one. I’m sure he has enough followers who would pony up some cash to support it.

    But I guess I’m in the “Let’s wait and see what happens” box. I’m happy about anything that impacts Infowars in a negative way but I am a little apprehensive about what this means for the future of political content on free social media.

    in reply to: tweets … 8/9 #89205
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Vincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
    Young guys I’m interested in watching who have flashed in camp: DL John Franklin-Meyers, RB John Kelly, OT Joseph Noteboom, OL Jamil Demby, WR Josh Reynolds, C Brian Allen. Also TE Temarrick Hemingway

    For sure the young starting linebackers. Just not sure how long the first team will be out there. Kiser’s on my list too. He’s looked efficient in practice especially in gap/run support.

    Camp reports often contradict each other. It has also been reported that Josh Reynolds was struggling with inconsistent hands. I guess the trick is to read a bunch of them and see if there’s a consensus.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    In addition to the Los Angeles local broadcast on CBS 2 and UniMás 46/KFTR, Rams preseason football will extend to households throughout California, Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada and Utah.

    Alaska, Nevada, Utah?

    That’s nice, but how about streaming it in places where people actually live?

    That is talking about regular tv, cable etc. I think they will stream to whoever connects with their website at https://www.therams.com/

    Cool. Thanks, Ag.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    In addition to the Los Angeles local broadcast on CBS 2 and UniMás 46/KFTR, Rams preseason football will extend to households throughout California, Alaska, Hawaii, Nevada and Utah.

    Alaska, Nevada, Utah?

    That’s nice, but how about streaming it in places where people actually live?

    in reply to: What Would You Like to See Against the Ravens #89177
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Aaron Donald standing on the sidelines in uniform but not participating.

    in reply to: Death by patient satisfaction #89122
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Nittany you’re in the medical industry.

    How accurate a picture is that?

    ..

    It’s an accurate depiction of the direction US healthcare is going.

    I’m on several committees at the hospital in which I work and everything we do is geared towards patient satisfaction.

    My wife is a physician. She pointed the article out to me. Her pay is directly tied to patient satisfaction. Her performance can be reviewed by patients after their visit. She’s actually rated by the number of stars she receives, where the patient can give her 1 to 5 stars depending on their level of satisfaction. On the surface this doesn’t seem like a bad thing, but the problem is that what makes the patient happy might not be what’s in the patient’s best interest. For example, when patients feel sick, they want an antibiotic. An antibiotic may not be warranted, but it doesn’t matter, if the patient doesn’t receive an antibiotic, the physician might get a bad rating. So the physician is under pressure to prescribe an unnecessary drug. Physicians know the ramifications of improperly used antibiotics (increased resistance) and are cautioned by their employers not to prescribe them when not necessary, but at the same time the employer is going to base the physician’s job performance, salary, and even employment on patient satisfaction. It puts be physician in a no-win situation. And this is just one example.

    Of course, the bottom line is, the patient may not be receiving the best possible care.

    in reply to: Rams front office discusses Aaron Donald contract #89116
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    No. Someone at TST did.

    in reply to: How History Classes Helped Create a 'Post-Truth' America #88980
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I read Lies My Teacher Told Me awhile back.

    He sites one of the reasons that students are presented with a tepid and ultimately false depiction of American history is because of the textbook publishers. Obviously. they are trying to sell as many books as possible, so they market them to school boards across the country. But to get school boards to approve of their textbooks’ purchase, the members of the boards must like what’s in them. The material better not offend the people on the board.

    And since they can’t make different versions of the textbook for different regions of the country, they need a “one size fits all” textbook.

    So ultimately, wherever you live, even if it’s in America-hating commie regions of the country like California or Vermont, your history text will promote the “America the Savior” perspective because publishers can’t afford to piss off the blue-haired “daughter of the Confederacy” sitting on a school board in Texas.

    in reply to: 3-5 word quote that summarizes a favorite movie for you #88956
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Suicidal teen loves happy octogenarian.

    Tyrannical media tycoon loses toboggan.

    Shark eats tourists.

    Well I was thinking more of a quote from the movie. A short quote that summarizes a movie for you.

    Since you did Jaws, I will offer an example.

    “Not with three he can’t!”

    FYI for everyone, the line I posted (“Foreground my ass!”) is also from the movie, Jaws.

    It’s said by Brody when they are on the Orca and they see the shark for the first time. Hooper is taken aback by the sharks size and wants to get photos of it. He keeps pleading with Brody to go to the end of the pulpit (the platform that sticks precariously out from the front of the boat) and Brody keeps asking why. Finally Hooper says he needs Brody in the foreground of the photo so people can see the scale of the shark. That’s when Brody shouts ‘Foreground my ass!’

    ss

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    • This reply was modified 6 years, 8 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: It Came From Across the Asphalt… #88954
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Gnat maggots on the path of the holy pilgrimage?!

    Blaspheme!

    You shall suffer the wrath of God!

    Behold his angry visage.

    Mm

    Yep, he’s pissed alright.

    in reply to: signs, comics, memes, & other visual aids #88887
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    dd

    in reply to: 3-5 word quote that summarizes a favorite movie for you #88886
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Limiting it to five words makes it hard.

    “Kkkken’s coming to kkkill me.”
    “Life, uh, finds a way.”
    “Foreground my ass!”

    in reply to: Land use in the US #88872
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    And as i understand it, the meat-biz is causing more global-warming than the gasoline-biz. And it aint even close. So i read, anywayz.

    w
    v

    I’ve posted this before but this is the saddest graphic I’ve seen in awhile…
    dd

    in reply to: Land use in the US #88871
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I don’t think “wildfires” is actually a Land Usage.

    And that’s exactly what George Soros wants you to believe.

    Lemming.

    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Previous Rams’ front offices often leaked negative and ridiculous comments about high profile players in contract disputes to the press (ie “Marshall Faulk is just a third down back”, etc).

    I guess it’s a good sign that we haven’t heard anything of the sort from the current front office about Donald yet.

    in reply to: Land use in the US #88775
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Looks like around a third of all the land in the US is used for livestock – either as pasture or for growing their food.

    in reply to: tweets … 7/26-27 #88576
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: celebrity-pundits talk about socialism #88518
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    <groan> I don’t know if I should even watch that.

    It’s probably like watching a 9ers fan and a Seahawk fan talk about the Rams.

    in reply to: Rams Sign Brandin Cooks to 5-Year Extension #88325
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Is he as good as Sammy Watkins?

    w
    v

    [color color=blue]I think he is a bit better, but it is hard to tell.[/color]

    I think Watkins is a little more talented. The knock on Cook is that he isn’t a nifty runner nor is he good at catching passes in traffic, battling for balls, etc. Supposedly he became expendable in New England because he’s not good at catching passes underneath the LBs, which is where Brady likes to throw the most.

    But he is very fast and can get open over the top which is what MCVay is looking for. And, unlike Watkins, he’s not injury prone. Also unlike Watkins, he’s been one of the most productive WRs since he’s been in the league. Mannion played with him in college and says he’s really bright.

    • This reply was modified 6 years, 9 months ago by Avatar photonittany ram.
    in reply to: What does this mean? #88243
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Agreed. Way too much jargon. It looks like the author got a shiny new vocabulary and wants to show it off.

    I’m surprised the site would allow it to be published it that form. Even the reviewers of scholarly journals often force rewrites of submissions with too much jargon.

    It’s standard issue graduate school discourse in the field.

    And journals in the field don’t care. SJ’s are for people in the discipline, not general readership.

    People not in the field find it unreadable. But then that’s true of every field, including for example sociology or anthropology or psychology.

    It’s not jargon, it’s field-bound concepts. Those always lose something in translation. I translated it in a prior post…I know I left things out. Not all concepts like that have easy synonymns.

    It’s a double-edged sword. Should field-bound scholarship encourage prose that fits a general readership? Well…why? They’re in-field studies with that audience in mind. That serves its own, different purpose.

    But post it outside it’s intended field and these very questions get raised. People in the field know that … and aren’t about to change.

    ….

    Well, I can only speak to my own experience. I wrote a paper for a technical journal that was accepted with revision. Reviewer 2 wanted me to replace some of the technical jargon he/she thought was unnecessary even though the paper would likely not be seen by anyone other than my peers, and in grad school we were cautioned against using excessive technical jargon in a writing class for biomedical research papers. And they weren’t just talking about grant proposals or IRB applications where lay people are part of the process.

    in reply to: What does this mean? #88214
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Ok, one of youz smart people — dum this down for me. What does it say?

    “….A decolonial approach would necessitate moving past the individualistic liberal ontology underpinning much of feminism today, including some strands of intersectionality. This entails problematizing the assumption that the subject is always erased from the analysis, thus producing a myth about universal and objective knowledge. Instead, “critical border thinking” can be employed, which is a form of subaltern epistemology that does not hide the epistemic positionality of the subject speaking.[5] This allows for decolonial interpretative communities to be produced that challenge Western notions of universality, neutrality and linear evolution. By critically deconstructing Western concepts and structures that have been normalized, the first step towards dismantling them has been taken.[6]…”

    Just going by that quote — I didn’t click on the link yet — I’d say the writer is a really bad writer, and thinks they can make up for their lack of language skills with waves of jargon. Judith Butler used to win awards for this kind of thing. Awards that you’d generally want to avoid.

    I’m feeling like quite the curmudgeon today, for some reason!!

    ;>)

    Agreed. Way too much jargon. It looks like the author got a shiny new vocabulary and wants to show it off.

    I’m surprised the site would allow it to be published it that form. Even the reviewers of scholarly journals often force rewrites of submissions with too much jargon.

    in reply to: The FBI, Trump, & elections #88178
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I think the FBI has changed since Hoover.

    One example…the FBI no longer thinks left wing radicals are the biggest threat to the country. They now believe homegrown white wing extremist groups are the biggest threat (ie Michigan Militia, 3 Percenters, the various neo Nazi and Klan groups, etc.).

    Which is in direct opposition to the rightwing narrative that the biggest threats are illegal immigrants and Muslim extremists.

    Now, I’m not saying the FBI is completely trustworthy because I don’t think they are, but it is telling that they are no longer marching in lockstep with the rightwing.

    in reply to: signs, comics, memes, & other visual aids #88156
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: Cornell West and Tucker Carlson on 'socialism' #88131
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    Perhaps the way to bridge that gap is to say: Democratic socialists are more than willing to push social democratic policies, on the way toward achieving actual socialism — Medicare for all, a living wage, cradle to grave free public education, etc. etc. But they still have the ultimate goal of fully democratizing the economy and socializing ownership of the means of production. Social democrats don’t have those goals. They are fine with Scandinavia as end-goal.

    We socialists want more.

    Democratic socialism vs social democracy…

    What we want vs what is achievable.

    I became interested in democratic socialism in college. But it is no more of an achievable goal today than it was way back then. If anything, less so. Capitalism is too imbedded in our society to be rooted out. Not in my lifetime anyway.

    So it comes down to the practical versus the illusory hope.

    I think forcing a muzzle on capitalism is at least theoretically doable. I think that’s an attainable albeit really ambitious goal. The millennials are sorta sniffing around that hole already.

    You’re free to disagree of course, BillyT.

    Perhaps social democracy can be a waypoint on our way to democratic socialism – the ultimate goal. When asked about the Vikings’ defensive philosophy, Keith Millard used to say that they tackle the RB on the way to the QB. 😉

    in reply to: tweets … 7/11 #87989
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    in reply to: We Are Screwed #87987
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    My wife and I have begun thinking about other places to live – places more in line with our political ideals. Not seriously discussing it yet, but I can see those discussions happening soon.

    Just letting you know in case you see the moniker ‘Scandinavia Ram’ around here in the near future.

    in reply to: Democrats should get "centered" #87848
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I can’t read the article but they already are centrist. They’ve been that way for quite awhile. Their republican-lite centrist policies helped create Trump.

    The dem party in RI may actually support an alt right candidate over the progressive incumbent. Why? Because the incumbent, in their eyes, leans too far to the left.

    The dems need progressive policies that speak to the working class. Their abandonment of the working class, their complicity in the destruction of trade unions, their embracement of Wall Street and corporate interests (ie, their adoption of centrist ideals) has been the dem party’s modus operandi for too long, and is why they don’t represent a real alternative to the GOP to many voters. They are just the GOP’s wussy little brother.

    in reply to: the uniform #87794
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    the blue and gold jerseys combined with the blue and white helmet is not a good look, but they knew they were going to be stuck with it a couple times a year.

    Maybe not. As in, maybe they won;t be stuck with it. They only wear the white helmets with blue jerseys on the road when the home team elects to wear white. That happens at most 2-3 times a year. With the new league rule, they can wear the color rush once and the throwbacks twice, and when they wear them is up to the team. So if they go on the road and the home team elects to wear white, they have up to 3 opportunities to fix that by wearing either the throwback or the color rush.

    Yeah that could be true for this year, which would be great.

    But it wasn’t true when they first decided to go with the blue and white helmets. At that time they knew there were times when they would be forced to wear the blue and gold jerseys with he blue and white helmets, which they did indeed do a few times last year.

    But when the idea of doing back to blue and white helmets was decided, they had no reason to believe they could avoid the blue and gold jerseys, but they decided to go that route anyway. Which is fine, but then don’t complain about it.

    That was my point, which would have been obvious to any true Rams fan, btw.

    in reply to: the uniform #87792
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    The uniform issue is a self inflicted injury. They knew the rules governing uniform changes going in, and they still decided to go to the white horned helmets.

    I’m really glad they made the change. I think the only reason they did it was to try to instill interest in a team that went 4-12 in their first season. They know Rams fans have a particularly close relationship with the uniform and any talk of change will generate interest. But anyway, it was great seeing the blue and white helmets again – the colors they wore when I first became a fan. Unfortunately, the change is temporary, as they are almost assuredly going with some blue and yellow combination with the new uniforms, as that seems to be what most fans prefer.

    Yeah, the blue and gold jerseys combined with the blue and white helmet is not a good look, but they knew they were going to be stuck with it a couple times a year. No point in complaining about it now. It’s a trade off I’m happy with if it means seeing the blue and white helmets again – if only for a little while longer.

Viewing 30 posts - 1,141 through 1,170 (of 3,612 total)