zn wrote:

Yep. All energy sources and energy production modes plus all utilities should be nationalized and publicly owned.

For one thing, none of it should be competing. They should all be collaborating under the umbrella of rational policies.

And of course none of it should be profit driven. Rational planning, not profit.

Cause. I mean. Jeesh.

Well said. I would put you in charge if all this if it were up to me.

Your official title would be Director of Energy Resources and Scorpion Ballista Deployment.

That was really good.

Along with a carbon tax we need to continuously look to improve upon existing forms of renewable energy and develop new technologies. But any serious proposal to stop climate change must include nuclear energy. Global electricity usage is projected to increase by 50% in the next 20 years or so. Wind and solar power alone simply cannot accommodate that demand. Nuclear energy could and it produces zero carbon. Nuclear energy has its own challenges (nuclear waste, etc) but we no longer have the time to ignore viable options no matter how unpopular they might be.

The Ending of Game of Thrones

<Warning – spoilers galore if you are not up to date>

I always knew, deep down, that Game of Thrones (GOT) would not have a happy ending. Once Ned Stark got his head cut off at the end of the first book/season, I think everyone knew this was a different kind of fantasy story. I read the books first, and as I did it became clear that I was reading a tragedy and a horror story, not heroic fantasy.

I have a few thoughts I would like to share as the last episode of the series is ready to air. The people I watch the show with had a range of reactions to the second-to-last episode, but I think it was completely consistent with the story George R.R. Martin has been telling us all along. He has been deconstructing the medieval fairy tale right in front of our eyes, hitting us over the head with the reality that we already know. It’s interesting how difficult it can be for many to just accept that.

The final delusion was that Martin would bring it all back home. In the end the heroes would defeat evil, a good person would sit on the throne, and a golden age would dawn – it’s the Lord of the Rings ending. But come on – didn’t we all know this story was not LOTR?

First, the Night King, the White Walkers, and their army of the dead was always a side show, even if it was the most captivating. Most of the series has focused on the title action – a game of thrones. I liken the Night King to a natural disaster – it’s looming in the background, some are warning of it, but mostly people ignore it while they focus on their short term politics. In the end we are really not prepared when the disaster finally arrives. The living actuality lly straight-up lose the battle of Winterfell. (Don’t get me started on the terrible battle tactics: opening with a frontal cavalry charge, putting your troops outside your own choke point, and not opening with a sustained artillery bombardment, etc. – but that’s a side point.)

I think the lesson there is that death comes for all of us, and the best we can really do when we confront it is to either say, “not today,” or to face it bravely. Somehow life manages to keep crawling forward. It’s like the Plague, in the end it’s a distraction from what we are really interested in, our political battles.

Getting back to the eponymous main story, Martin has, through his characters, pretty much told us directly how this world works. It is brutal and heartless. Power is all that matters – power through wealth, ruthless cunning, personal prowess, and force of arms. If you think about every character arc in the story, the more brutal and selfish they are, the more they succeed. The more kind, honorable, and trusting they are, the more the world chews them up and destroys them.

Take almost any character – Tyrion used to be much more cynical, and earned a reputation for being cunning and ruthless when he had to be (as Daenerys recently noted). As he has become more and more concerned with the populace, with being a good person, the more hapless he has become. All this has earned him was a string of failures. Arya succeeded because she became a deadly assassin. Sansa went from a naive girl to a savvy politician.

There are some good people in the world (Davos, Brienne) but they are generally at the mercy of those in power. They have no personal ambitions, really, and try to stay in the background serving others.

You survive in a brutal world by being brutal. The world hardens your heart, or it kills you. The other thing you do to survive is to cling to those around you, your family, your people. Don’t trust outsiders. The point is made many times. The North doesn’t trust southerners. Jamie says all the horrible things he did he did for his family, with no regrets, and he’d do it again. In the end he had a choice between the honorable Brienne and family, and he chose his sister. Even Tyrion chose to save his remaining family in the end. The Starks reestablished their power and defeated their foes by staying loyal to each other. Theon realized in the end the Starks were his real family, and his tragic failure was in betraying that.

So how does one win the game of thrones? I think Martin is trying to say that you don’t. The game itself is broken. At best you can have temporary success, if you are able to climb on top of enough other people, but your success is never stable. In order to maintain power you need to perpetuate the brutality and inherent injustice of the system.

The Targaryens were able to unite and rule Westeros because they had dragons – the ultimate military power in this world (as we just saw again in the latest episode). When the dragons died out, their downfall was inevitable. Daenerys can only reestablish Targaryen rule by bringing back the dragons. The Lannisters were a powerful house because of their gold mines. When they dried up, their days were numbered.

What is interesting is that as viewers of this show, from our 21st century Western vantage point, we know this world is broken. The answer is not to put a relatively benign brutal dictator on the throne. Daenerys said it herself – her goal is not to win a turn of the wheel, but to break the wheel. Unfortunately, she did not do that. She just gave it history’s most brutal turn. She convinced herself that to save future generations, she had to burn this one to the ground.

There are only the faintest glimmers of a real solution in the world. The Brothers without Banners are onto something by disavowing all feudal ties. Sandor Clegane (the Hound) recognizes that all knights and nobles are “c@#nts”, and wants no part of it. We come to respect this initially villainous character because he gives us a rare glimpse of someone who realizes the world is broken. He doesn’t have a solution, however, just personal vengeance and more cynicism.

Varys is genuinely concerned for the people, but his solution is to support the best brutal dictator. Even Jon Snow, perhaps the best of them, condones capital punishment for minors, leads thousands of his soldiers to their death because someone pissed him off, and is OK supporting a queen who immolates those who don’t bend the knee to her. To him honor is being the one to personally swing the sword when you order someone’s death for, say, abandoning their post.

There isn’t a single truly virtuous ruler by modern standards in this story. Just shades of gray.

What Westeros needs is a revolution. They need a philosophy of enlightenment, a Magna Carta, something that truly breaks the wheel of totalitarian rule. They need to replace the rule of men with the rule of law. That is their only hope. This is why the rule of law is so precious – a fitting lesson for this time, and perhaps any time.

The totalitarian rule of people has no happy fairy tale ending. Deep down we all know that. We all saw this coming. Martin told us directly countless times in the telling of this story. But still, we want the fairy tale. We want the good guys to win in the end. But Martin is making a strong point – in this system, one ruled by the game of thrones, there are no good guys. There are relatively more or less brutal people, and the more brutal people tend to succeed over time.

This story was always a tragedy.

zn wrote:

One theory I have heard is that in the rough waters, it was possible that both the bow and the stern could have been raised by the crests of huge storm waves, and in that case the ship was so heavy with ore that when the middle of the hull was suspended over a deep trough it would have just snapped in half.

…

That sounds reasonable. The wreck was found in two pieces, snapped in half, almost through the exact middle of the ship.

I saw Gordon Lightfoot perform live sometime in the late 80’s. He has a few songs I really like, but none more-so than The Wreck of the Edmond Fitzgerald. He really paints a picture with that song.

“When suppertime came the old cook came on deck and said Fellas it’s too rough to feed ya.
At 7pm a main hatchway caved in, he said Fellas it’s been good to know ya.”

wv wrote:

Well. Another walking-on-sunshine post from Cappy.

I talked to Mother Nature just last week, btw, and She said she cares deeply about dung beetles.

w
v

It’s not nice to lie about Mother Nature.

You know how angry she can get.

The Tense Friendship Between Arya Stark and the Hound Reimagined as a 1980s TV Sitcom Spinoff https://t.co/xUxOkaorGO via @LaughingSquid

— Graham Hughes Author (@Mummsyandzomb) May 10, 2019

• This reply was modified 5 years, 10 months ago by nittany ram.
• This reply was modified 5 years, 10 months ago by nittany ram.

https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/coca-cola-and-corporate-sponsored-research/

How all #GameOfThrones fans want the show to end pic.twitter.com/USTObn7k58

— Alpha Gold Wolf 👹 DoctorwhoIntoTheVortex (@lonewolfs_alpha) May 6, 2019

zn wrote:

the brightend battle of winterfell

That lighting is much better. Makes it easier to discern what is happening in key scenes…the dragon fight, Arya and the Night King, etc.

Wait a minute…

If the Night King is dead, then how is wv still posting here?

His laptop should be buried under a couple thousand ice cubes.

wv wrote:

Are ALL the Dothraki dead?

w
v

No.

Just the ones that followed Daenerys to Westeros.

wv wrote:

Episode 3 — spoilers.

First off, I think they have wasted Tyrian and Verris (sp?)so far this season. Dinklage was the best part of this series and they are wasting his talents. And Verris might as well not even exist anymore. I think those are mistakes. Focusing on the Dragon queen, who has zero charisma and zero talent is a mistake, imho.

The big battle scene was ok, but it was not as good as the battle of the bastards.

The Dragon stuff was all good. The dragons at night, battling, were awesome. (I couldnt figure out what happened to John’s dragon? How many dragons are left?)

I am in favor of Drogon sitting on the Iron Throne.

w
v
Drogon is one of the dragons born in the Dothraki sea. Commanded by Daenerys Targaryen, he is named for her dead husband, Drogo.

Drogon is believed to be the reincarnation of Balerion the Black Dread, but Daenerys decides to give him a new name for his new life.[1]

The largest and most aggressive of Daenerys’s three dragons, Daenerys has problems reining him in.
Contents:https://awoiaf.westeros.org/index.php/Drogon

Appearance

See also: Images of Drogon

Drogon’s scales are black, his horns and spinal plates are blood red,and his eyes are smouldering red pits.[2] His teeth are black as well.[3][2] his flame is black fire shot with red and the wash of its heat can be felt thirty feet away. His wing flap sounds like the clap of thunder. He bleeds black blood.[2]

As of A Dance with Dragons, Drogon’s wings stretch twenty feet from tip-to-tip, black as jet.[2]

See, I thought the dragon fight was hard to follow. And it was difficult to tell what the outcome was. Immediately after the fight when John’s dragon sorta crash landed, they never showed it again. However, I’m pretty sure it’s ok. I assumed the Night King’s dragon was dead so I was surprised to see it wreaking havoc inside Winterfell later on.

wv wrote:

I managed to see the first two episodes. Dunno when I’ll see the rest.

I thought the first episode was excellent. The second, was just ‘ok.’ I tried to think of why i didnt like it as much and it struck me that the reason was — cause I’ve seen all that before. I’ve seen it a gazillion times.

Spoiler — episode two was all about ‘the night before the battle’. Some folks get drunk, some get laid, etc etc. Seen it all before a million times. Saw it in 13th Warrior, for example.

w
v

Well, I certainly agree that Ep 1 was better than Ep 2.

But I really liked the scene where everyone was sitting around the fire, getting drunk, and telling stories. I found that to be very relatable. That’s how I spent my entire 20’s and early 30’s. 😉

*****************************************SPOILERS***************************************************
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
‘
Well, episode three was both awesome and had a huge unexpected ending.

My only major complaint is with the ridiculous strategy of sending the Dothraki to charge the Dead alone while two dragons sat around watching.

Like they were the Irish at Fredericksburg.

However, it was dramatic watching the fires from the Dothraki swords being extinguished in the distance.

Who woulda thunk the Night King would have been defeated with three episodes to go?

Well, onto to King’s Landing. Of course, John and Dani don’t have an army anymore….