Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 211 through 240 (of 353 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Seattle: Game One Menu #29839
    NERam
    Participant

    Well, the ‘boom-boom sauce’ looks a little hot dont it:

    Ingredients

    2 bell peppers (red and orange)
    2 -3 jalapeno peppers
    1 -2 serrano pepper
    2 -3 garlic cloves
    1 bunch cilantro
    1 (4 ounce) canhot chopped green chili peppers
    1 (4 ounce) canmild chopped green chili peppers
    1 (11 ounce) cancrushed tomatillos
    1 (10 ounce) can condensed cream of chicken soup
    1 lb American cheese
    ==============

    w
    v

    Yeah, prolly don’t mix it with your coffee tho…

    in reply to: Seattle: Game One Menu #29837
    NERam
    Participant

    I suppose if you wanted to acknowledge their “D”, you could try one of these:

    http://www.food.com/recipe/boom-boom-sauce-405500

    http://www.food.com/recipe/chuys-chicka-chicka-boom-boom-enchiladas-463981

    If you wanted to go with the stadium theme, maybe something from here:

    http://www.deafmansbbq.com/category/family-bbq-recipes/

    Aaaaaaaaand, if you wanted to tip your hat to the Rams, I suppose anything made in your slow-starter, I mean slow cooker might be nice.

    NERam
    Participant

    I’m all for being competitive, but if intentional, this ain’t cool…

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/bradford-murray-look-sharp-in-eagles-40-17-win-over-ravens/ar-BBm0QAa

    Bradford survived a late hit by Terrell Suggs, who lowered his helmet and tackled his knees for a roughing penalty. Bradford also took a hard shot from Brandon Williams and appeared shaken up, but stayed in to complete the drive.

    NERam
    Participant

    IMO, I can’t see why this D should be stumbling at all through the PS.

    They pulled it together in the last half of the 2014 season, and played some good football. And, for the most part, this is the same group, ain’t it? Players, DC, scheme???

    If there hasn’t been a significant change, I fail to see why this group should be showing any signs of regression. These aren’t 14 year vets, where age might be slowing them down.

    A little rust, perhaps, which should be able to be worked off during PS, but definitely not any major issues.

    NERam
    Participant

    I have less patience now then I’ve had in a Long time.
    It’s year four for Fisher. Lots of high draft picks.
    Everyone is healthy. They are playing at home.

    I am a tired, old, fed-up fan who will not be satisfied
    with any moral victories or “they played Seattle tough” stuff.
    Seattle is almost invincible in Seattle but on the road they
    can be taken by good teams.

    Anything less than a Win over a vulnerable Seattle team
    is going to really vex my ass. Fwiw.

    w
    v

    Thats what I meant, maybe not clear enough. I was talking about a W at home, and a W in Seattle. Not a moral victory anywhere.

    Had to grin a little, wondering if the post above was penned by wv or RFL. Maybe wRFLv.

    I say that in jest, knowing that you are absolutely right. So is RFL. So is anyone else who has followed this team for any length of time, and is just not into the “good effort” lines Monday after Monday after Monday.

    Looking back on how long it’s been, I have been following this team for 46 years. I’m not sure I’ve done anything else for 46 years. So there is a reasonable investment on my end.

    I too, am becoming more than impatient. I turned the game on last week, and watched maybe the first quarter, then got absorbed in something else that had more command of my attention. I realize that the 1’s came out for only a series or 2, but this has happened more and more, during the regular season as well.

    So yes. The time is now.

    NERam
    Participant

    Such a big game for both teams, early on.
    It kinda feels like a playoff game to me,
    as a Ram fan.

    w
    v

    From the perspective of starting the season quickly, as opposed to waitng until game 6 to turn the jets on, yes, agreed, playoff game emotions.

    However, the Rams have played them pretty well at home, so theres kind of an expectation that this should continue. For me, anyways.

    The real coup will be getting a “W” in Seattle, on 12/27. I might be inclined to forego all rights to my Christmas presents if that could be arranged…

    NERam
    Participant

    Yeah, I remember reading this before. And, thinking to myself “This has got to help the Rams D become more disciplined, and start gaining some respectability”.

    All the while with this caveat-

    Yes, this can be Williams’ downfall when he gets too aggressive in the game plan. That has shown up before when he was coaching in New Orleans. Blitz too much and you can hang your defensive backs out to dry with no help anywhere on the field.

    in reply to: RFL's challenge to the board: #28970
    NERam
    Participant

    I don’t get too too excited either way when looking at preseason. Case in point, 2011.

    Rams go 4-0 in preseason, then drop a 2-14 clunker the rest of the year. I can’t draw too much in the way of PS results. Better to just look at talent, and potential.

    I agree with Ag also. Way too much D talent to be abysmal.

    RFL, to your original question, I think I’m placing a pretty high emphasis on how they start out the Regular Season, more so than the PS numbers and effort. And I know that sounds trite.

    Will they be sluggish and uninspired, disciplined and consistent, or a dominating wrecking crew? First couple of RS games should be more telling.

    in reply to: JT chat 8/12 #28633
    NERam
    Participant

    Jim, As always thanks for the chat. Sorry if this was already asked but I have several questions. There’s a certain poster who calls himself Hammer in the Rams forum. He claims to be at most of the Rams practices and he’s adamant that 1) Chris Long is finished. 2) That GRob losing 25 lbs has him being pushed around by even the back up D-linemen. 3) that William Hayes has lost not one, but TWO steps. 4) That Greg Williams has the D blitzing so often that the team can’t work on it’s intermediate to deep passing game. 5) That Tavon Austin looks lost and will continue to be a bust. And 6) That Michael Brockers will never be a good pass rusher because he lacks the “quick twitch” muscles. Any truth to any of these claims or is the guy full of s**t?
    by Ron 4:32 PM

    Sorry, I’ll pass on this one. We’re all entitled to our opinion.
    by jthomas 4:32 PM

    Mixed camp reports coming from different sources. This makes me feel better.

    I think…

    in reply to: Rams Introduce Quarterback Nick Foles #28204
    NERam
    Participant

    So it’s subtle and embedded, but Snead does not say the Rams wanted “to get rid of” SB…that’s just how he characterizes all the trade inquiries that poured in at the combine. It’s the OTHER TEAMS trying to figure out if the Rams feel that way. Basically Snead says no, that’s not what we wanted…but then, when there was a chance to trade for ANOTHER starting qb, they were fine with that. I get the idea that he’s saying if they just wanted to get rid of him, they had plenty of chances. But the did not make a move until it was a qb for qb swap.

    Yer absolutely right. I totally missed that while watching the video.

    Well, now that the sun is shining again, I can enjoy the rest of the afternoon. Thanks for pointing that out.

    in reply to: Rams Introduce Quarterback Nick Foles #28194
    NERam
    Participant

    Interesting. I think that, if Fish gets his way, we’ll have a power running game AND a passing game that, combined, leave defenses in a bind: come up or get back? That’d be nice!

    Yes, that would be nice. 😉 Been a long time, hasn’t it.

    Agree with you also on the OL being the biggest unknown. We’ve seen what Foles is capable of, we’ve seen what the RB’s are capable of, not even including what Gurley brings, we’ve seen what the WR’s are capable of. If the OL can pull it together to produce a power running game and a passing game, coupled with a formidable “D”, I dunno, looks like a potential trifecta.

    in reply to: Rams Introduce Quarterback Nick Foles #28192
    NERam
    Participant

    Interesting choice of words here, at 00:26.

    Snead uses the phrase “get rid of” regarding Bradford. As opposed to saying something like “we were exploring options” or “we decided to go in a different direction with the QB position”. Something like that.

    I don’t know- maybe I’m being a little too picky, or reading into it too much. Just seemed a little harsh.

    Get rid of, to me, means dealing with someone or something unpleasant, unwanted or useless.

    Related to sports, I think I would “get rid of” a locker room cancer, or someone with repeated off field issues.

    Again, maybe just me.

    in reply to: Justin Blackmon's NFL career is likely over #28115
    NERam
    Participant

    I wanted Brockers all along. Boy, did Randy Karraker have a bad reaction to the Rams missing out on Blackmon.

    I think I was so fixated on getting a quality receiver for Bradford, nothing else made sense at the time.

    Hindsight being what it is, yeah, I guess Brockers turned out OK. 😉

    in reply to: Justin Blackmon's NFL career is likely over #28102
    NERam
    Participant

    Cannot believe I was hoping so much that he would be a Ram several years ago.

    Good thing I don’t draft people for a living.

    in reply to: time for the "barring injuries" season record predictions #27744
    NERam
    Participant

    9-7.

    Nice, safe, sensible, realistic, sucky, middle-of-the-road pick.

    After watching Foles and the new OL this year, maybe that gets jacked up next year to the lofty height of 10-6.

    Hard to believe that 10-6 is a desirable goal. Repeated mediocrity does strange things to your mind.

    NERam
    Participant

    NotaKellyfan (Eagles fan)

    Last year, Foles struggled but it was not solely his fault. Foles was playing behind a makeshift line for much of his time. Lane Johnson was suspended for the first four games. So the Eagles swung Todd Herremans out of his RG spot to RT. Evan Mathis, the LG, went down with an injury in week one. Jason Kelce, the starting Center, went down with an injury in week 3. The week 4 starting line, the week the Eagles played the 49ers, was Jason Peters at LT, Matt Tobin at LG, David Molk at C, Dennis Kelly at RG and Todd Herremans at RT. Like Foles, Herremans got hurt against the Texans. Kelce came back the week prior and Mathis came back for Sanchez’s first start. Sanchez had the benefit of 4/5ths of the line for his entire tenure.

    Lesean McCoy struggled mightily at certain points giving less than 20 rushing yards in two different games. Teams were rushing four guys and dropping into coverage because they were facing three, or in some cases, four backup linemen and able to get pressure.

    I am not trying to excuse all of Foles’ problems last year. He did have struggles. Several of his interceptions left me surprised and the fumble against the Rams had me highly irritated. Foles did fall into a phantom pressure mode after the first month or so. He would fade backwards to avoid pressure and end up rushing a throw, which IMO came from the new QB coach attempting to force quicker decisions. I have said before I believe the phantom pressure may have had something to do with the late hit against the Redskins where I believe he was actually hurt.

    Foles’ release is slower than Bradford’s. That was a definite question mark. It’s also fair game to question his deep accuracy though I would again point to the circumstances.

    But all told, The Eagles were in every game with Foles even the 49ers game where he did not play well in the least. He kept the team within reach and threw what could have been a gamewinning TD if Riley Cooper had hung onto the ball. Against the Cardinals Foles threw a last second pass into the endzone which would have won the game, but Jordan Matthews could not stay in bounds.

    I think he is legitimately capable of being a top ten QB and he should improve your team. I was honestly expecting Andy Reid to make another attempt at trading for him.

    A couple of thoughts I have, after reading this, from someone closer to the Eagles.

    First, it was good to see some specifics related to Foles off year in ’14, compared to his numbers in ’13.

    Prior to this, the dropoff reasons were murky. Which, for me anyway, kept me from getting too optimistic about how the trade was gonna shake out.

    So, the needle, I think, has ticked slightly upward.

    Unfortunately, the Rams OL questions remain. The comments about opposing defenses getting pressure with 4 rushers because they were facing 3 or sometimes 4 backups rang a familiar bell. Believe we have seen shades of that in the past.

    So, I guess I feel better about Foles now than I did previously, and continue hoping that the OL gels quickly and can keep him upright.

    in reply to: Happy Birthday Winnbrad #27598
    NERam
    Participant

    Happy belated Birthday, Mr. Winn

    in reply to: If Foles blows out his ACL in the first game… #27469
    NERam
    Participant

    …would that mean that God
    hates the Rams?

    I’m just askin.

    w
    v

    IF that happens, the “Snake Bit” avatar comes out of the moth balls for <sob> another season.

    Really, man. I don’t know why you like to fool around with stuff like that. KEEP AWAY!!!

    Don’t look at it, don’t touch it, don’t talk about it, don’t even think about it.

    Just stay away.

    in reply to: Ken Stabler has died #27136
    NERam
    Participant

    Colon cancer….

    He was a great Raider.

    Yeah, he was. A lotta fun to watch.

    in reply to: Pierre Paul has right index finger amputated #27102
    NERam
    Participant

    A head-scratcher, certainly.

    Wonder how much that’s gonna affect his play? His ability to get TO the passer? Maybe not too much. As far as tackling, or scooping up a fumble? I dunno. Remains to be seen.

    NERam
    Participant

    You’re obviously using a form of algebra that I am not familiar with. They teach that in Maine?

    I do think I get it though.

    I think.

    in reply to: Albert Haynesworth: Letter to My Younger Self #27058
    NERam
    Participant

    The ignorance about hydration back then, makes me cringe.
    Football is tough enough without the gordon liddy crap.

    w
    v

    It was rough at times, fer sure, WV.

    Saw guys pass out, one guy experienced temporary blindness. All because they wanted to toughen us up.

    ZN, interesting read. I still recall going in after practice, and standing at the water fountain and literally gulping cold water for what seemed like several minutes. We were that thirsty. But that student that died, 4 gallons of liquid? Wow.

    Good to see the State guidelines on controlling practice and equipment based upon temperature increases.

    in reply to: Albert Haynesworth: Letter to My Younger Self #27048
    NERam
    Participant

    I liked reading it. Certain portions made me think of when I played as a youngster. Not comparing myself to him at all, just the good times vs. bad times.

    Saturdays were game days. The entire team was upbeat, coaches weren’t screaming at you, there was electricity in the air, everybody had on clean and sharp looking “game” uniforms, there were cheerleaders, spectators… all was good. And that was only a 3 hour blip. And that was it. 3 hours a week.

    And then it was back to the practice field. Mondays weren’t too bad, watched film and had a light practice. Fridays were OK also, just walk-throughs. But, Tues., Wed., and Thurs were hell.

    No clean uniforms, just the old beat up practice uniforms that stunk cause nobody ever washed them. Coaches had a different mindset, no more uplifting; screaming and berating was the preferred language. There was no lush green grass to play on, instead was the hot old, dusty practice field. One coach actually stopped practice one time to make us look at a bottled water truck driving by, just to remind us how dry and thirsty we were. Another time he made all of us go over to a water faucet, and then he turned it on just enough so that a drop formed every 10-20 seconds. And then he told us to get down on our hands and knees to sniff the water. We couldn’t drink any, we could only smell it. Anyone who moistened their tongue would run laps.

    That was the 95% part. The 5% was the good times, the game day, the fun.

    I dunno, when I read stuff like this article, I think that we sometimes get so focused on the 5% part of NFL (game days) that we tend to not think so much of the 95% (behind the scenes developments. Business side, contracts, agents, politics).

    Ennyway, yeah, I did like the article. Always interesting to me to read what happens, not on game days.

    NERam
    Participant

    I watched that game, and remember it well. High hopes after that debut.

    NERam
    Participant

    23

    in reply to: Rams defense seeking fast start, consistency in 2015 #26778
    NERam
    Participant

    I would prefer it if the D just shut up,
    and played. I dont want to read about them
    ‘talking’ about how good they can be.

    w
    v

    Agreed. Perhaps putting together a season where there are more “W’s” than “L’s” might be a good idea. Until then, you ain’t done much, no matter how good you are in your own mind, or on paper.

    Even then, once your record improves, I still think it’s better to just play good football, and shut up.

    Don’t provide verbal incentives for other teams to zero in on, and don’t set yourself up for looking like an idiot if you run your mouth and then get your butt whooped.

    Cold, silent, professional and focused.

    I may be wrong, but I don’t remember guys like John Lynch or Troy Polamalu beating their chest too much. Hard hitters who did exactly that. Not too much of the verbal stuff.

    in reply to: time for the "how did you become a Rams fan" thread #26730
    NERam
    Participant

    Late 60’s, George Allen was in a TV commercial for either milk or the American Dairy Association. (I think I read somewhere that his idea of a celebration after a win was to go home to a bowl of ice cream. So there is a plausible tie to the white nectar.) At any rate, the commercial started off by Allen saying something like “Hello. I’m George Allen, Head Coach of the Los Angeles Rams. And these are the helmets of the Fearsome Foursome.” And then the camera panned down to 4 Rams helmets lined up in a row, in a beautiful display of the Blue & Whites . I can’t remember if there was, at that point, a video of the FF in action, coming off a snap and smashing helmets and shoulder pads. Or maybe that came later, toward the end of the commercial. Allen went on to say that he made sure that his players ate healthy during training camp, (with lots of milk) to be sure they played hard. I’m sure I probably have the sequence messed up, and maybe some of the dialogue. But I do remember the commercial, with the reference to the FF helmets, and that unforgettable sound of the helmet and shoulder pad impact, and the visual of them lined up together on a field. One look and an earful of that, and I bit. Thats all it took. Hook, line & sinker. Been that way ever since.

    BTW, the pic that Jimi put up a couple of years ago, the one with Bradford handing off to SJ39, both in the Blue and Whites? Mon Dieu, that was a beautiful but cruel tease. Someday, I keep telling myself.

    It’s funny, I have tried many times to find that commercial online, but no luck. I can find a stinking George Burns commercial made in 1951 for evaporated milk, but no George Allen, with the Fearsome Foursome and the Blue & White helmets.

    in reply to: Greg Wms. – 6/18 – vid & transcript #26568
    NERam
    Participant

    I think he did not do that last year the way he promised he would. I think he was still adjusting by the time the season started. I think he’s kind of a MCD style coordinator and didn’t really feel out what his guys could do. He no doubt thought he did, but he didn’t.

    I think there are a lot of reasons why, but, it goes to him.

    My own (quick, short hand) view of what happened with the sacks is this. The opposition was getting the ball out fast and paying special attention to Quinn. Among other things, adding Donald and then playing the safeties differently changed that. The biggest result of all that was the Denver game.

    Agree with that. And, I was thinking of the McD similarities as well.

    Is “paying special attention” French for “tackling”? If so, then yes, I think teams were paying special attention to Quinn.

    in reply to: Greg Wms. – 6/18 – vid & transcript #26560
    NERam
    Participant

    (On how much is able to dig deeper into what he likes to do now that he’s entering into his second season with the defense)
    “All that stuff is true, but also, ‘How do I not put too much clutter in what they’re thinking about?’ I take a lot of pride in adapting scheme to every team I go to. Every team I’ve gone to, I change the scheme based upon the skillset of the guys that are playing, not what I like calling. It’s what they can do. So, obviously because of understanding what they can do and what they like to do…and the other thing to is you talk to those guys here this offseason, is listen to them take ownership. Listen to them do a lot of the checking and audibling. I’ve given them a lot of tools in their toolbox, but now they understand those tools and they’ll be making calls out on the field that fits their skillset. They’ll stay in the family of the call, but the call has all kinds of adjustments that they can do that fits their skillset. They can do that now because we’ve had all this experience together.”

    I’ve heard that’s a good thing. If true.

    Wonder how that syncs up with the start of last year? Low sack count, etc?

    NERam
    Participant

    I wonder what that means exactly. WHY did they shorten the verbiage on offense. Are the Rams players dum?
    Is it a bad idea to do that? Good idea?

    w
    v

    Twins Right Ace Right 999 H Balloon.

    Whatta ya think? Is this “complex”, or simplified?

Viewing 30 posts - 211 through 240 (of 353 total)