Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 241 through 270 (of 4,288 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143465
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Latest mock I’m happy with. As per usual, I know the number of trades here would never happen in the real world, but I did stick to “fair” for all of them, rejecting offers that were far too generous in my favor. All of them landed roughly in the middle of “not enough and too much” range, left to right, and garnered “accepted.”

    My Selections
    48
    Rams Logo
    Trenton Simpson
    LB | Clemson LogoClemsonTRADE

    75
    Rams Logo
    Cedric Tillman
    WR | Tennessee LogoTennesseeTRADE

    77
    Rams Logo
    Gervon Dexter
    DL | Florida LogoFlorida

    112
    Rams Logo
    Jonathan Mingo
    WR | Mississippi LogoMississippiTRADE

    116
    Rams Logo
    Jartavius Martin
    S | Illinois LogoIllinoisTRADE

    135
    Rams Logo
    Riley Moss
    CB | Iowa LogoIowaTRADE

    147
    Rams Logo
    Israel Abanikanda
    RB | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburghTRADE

    152
    Rams Logo
    Chandler Zavala
    IOL | NC State LogoNC StateTRADE

    159
    Rams Logo
    YaYa Diaby
    EDGE | Louisville LogoLouisvilleTRADE

    167
    Rams Logo
    Brenton Strange
    TE | Penn State LogoPenn State

    170
    Rams Logo
    Keaton Mitchell
    RB | East Carolina LogoEast CarolinaTRADE

    171
    Rams Logo
    Nick Saldiveri
    OT | Old Dominion LogoOld Dominion

    177
    Rams Logo
    Yasir Abdullah
    LB | Louisville LogoLouisvilleTRADE

    182
    Rams Logo
    Ricky Stromberg
    IOL | Arkansas LogoArkansas

    183
    Rams Logo
    Cameron Mitchell
    CB | Northwestern LogoNorthwesternTRADE

    189
    Rams Logo
    Daniel Scott
    S | California LogoCalifornia

    191
    Rams Logo
    Keondre Coburn
    DL | Texas LogoTexas

    194
    Rams Logo
    Clayton Tune
    QB | Houston LogoHoustonTRADE

    223
    Rams Logo
    Carter Warren
    OT | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburgh

    224
    Rams Logo
    Dylan Horton
    EDGE | TCU LogoTCUTRADE

    225
    Rams Logo
    B.J. Thompson
    EDGE | Stephen F. Austin LogoStephen F. AustinTRADE

    251
    Rams Logo
    Anthony Bradford
    IOL | LSU LogoLSU

    in reply to: Do you guys make this trade? Kupp to the Giants for . . . #143457
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Agreeing with Zooey about Kupp’s likely production, if he’s healthy. But his window is closing. Again, I think he’s likely far more valuable to the Rams than to other teams. Combination of intangibles, locker room impact, and familiarity with the ecosystem. Woods was similar in that way, IMO. He was a legit #1 with the Rams. Not so sure the rest of the league saw him in that light.

    Jourdan mentioned a coupla weeks ago that the time to do a rebuild was actually right after the Super Bowl win. Sounds kinda crazy, unless we consider that was the peak “value” time for core players, especially Stafford before his extension.

    Right now, they’re beyond the wave, basically. Last year likely hurt the league-wide valuation of a lot of Rams players — unfair and short-sighted as that may be.

    ZN, I think you and I probably differ on the current talent level on the Rams, and whether or not they need major upgrades. But I also have a feeling that the Brass is probably in your corner on that issue, not mine.

    Anyway, I’m hoping the Rams make several draft-day trades early to garner more picks (if they have partners), and then trade back up later. It’s a pretty deep draft in the areas the Rams need to address most: corners and pass-rushers. They also need safeties, and competition at center, both guards, both tackles. A mismatch TE would be great too, as would a size/speed wideout, a speedy running back, and a bulldozer RB as well. In my mocks, I try to get a coupla DTs too.

     

    in reply to: Can’t Believe Matt Taibbi Sold Out #143439
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Quick side note, Zooey. I noticed on your twitter feed — which is a good one, btw . . . that you had a run-in with someone spouting BS about Nader giving us Bush.

    It was actually more than 300,000 registered Dems who voted directly for Bush in Florida in 2000. Can’t blame that on the Green Party. Nader may have pulled roughly just 24,000 potential Gore voters away from him, total. At most. Folks need to do the math.

    Plus, as you know, our presidential elections never come down to just one state. Florida couldn’t have “decided” the election even if Nader had wanted that to happen. Gore ran a lousy campaign, the country had Clinton fatigue, and he lost his own home state, and 29 others. It didn’t come down to just Florida. That’s like saying a basketball game comes down to the last shot in a 115 to 114 loss. As if all the missed shot and turnovers and various other botched plays meant nothing leading up to that last shot, etc.

    Far too many Americans are math and logic averse.

    in reply to: Can’t Believe Matt Taibbi Sold Out #143438
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Yeah, I’m referring to the Twitter files. I don’t really know much about it because I don’t really care, but it doesn’t look good for Taibbi. My thing on the “doom” is that leftists just can’t get any traction anywhere in the machine. Elect someone, and they are brought to heel almost immediately. Get a platform in the media, some right wing carnivore buys the platform, and moves it to the right. Get an individual voice in the media, and they get paid to compromise on this one tiny issue, and their soul is for sale. Nobody wants to follow Assange or Donzinger. Meanwhile, Twitter is always abuzz with wars over Dore, Taibbi, Cenk, Daou, Ritter, you name it. My thing is always, “I don’t demand a purity test. These people aren’t my messiah. When I agree with them, I agree with them, and when I don’t, I don’t.” But it appears many people on the left get all “brand loyal” to various talking heads, and then we get civil wars. That’s where the “doom” comes from. We can’t get traction in the gov’t or in the media. We’re screwed.

     

    I agree with all of that. We all should be free agents in our criticism. Truly independent. Joining teams and never deviating from those teams . . . . that’s the road to ruin.

    Which takes me back to this: I perfectly understand (and agree with) intense anger at the Dems on a wide array of issues, including a sense of constant betrayal in general. But when some public figure on the left chooses to support the GOP in its various battles with the Dems? That’s not even remotely in line with leftist ideals or goals. Quite the opposite, in my view. On every issue under the sun, the GOP is worse, and it’s really not close. Two rotten, effed up choices, but one is a hell of a lot worse.

    Blast both parties and what they do — or fail to do. But taking sides with the far worse of the two rotten choices, cuz it may somehow supposedly “help” take down part of the oligarchical establishment? That’s just stupid and beyond naive. Cuz the political right will always, always be the far worse part of that establishment, and they’re in the bag for the oligarchs too. It’s not as if Taibbi took sides with any champions of Labor, the Environment, universal health care, education, free speech, an end to mass incarceration, an end to wars, etc. etc. He took sides with the party that’s even worse on those issues than the Dems.

    I will always support standing with true champions in the fight for universal human rights and protection of the planet . . . but that aint the GOP, obviously. So why the eff would Taibbi or anyone else help them in their fake ass battle against the Dems?

     

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143426
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I think there are more than ten immediate or eventual starters in the haul above, and several depth-players would beat out current depth-players. The Rams get bigger, faster, more athletic. Athleticism is a major key to my choices. Your comments are welcome, etc.

    Who is Drew Sanders I will just pretend like I’m not a deeply and widely well-informed draft guru, and let you have the floor. 😎

     

    Drew Sanders is a linebacker for Arkansas, 6’4″, 235, but the Rams could use him as Edge . . . and/or. Good size, excellent athlete. Sub-4.6 speed. Will turn 22 late in his rookie year. Still time to grow, etc. Usually the top linebacker in most mocks/boards, he slots in at #40 on average.

    Good breakdown here:

    2023 NFL Draft Player Profiles: Arkansas ILB Drew Sanders

    As others have mentioned, this is a pretty good draft for guys who can play Edge. So the Rams could do as I did, trade down a few times, and still get someone like Sanders, Uzomah, McDonald, Adebawore, White, Simpson, Foskey, or Wall. Any one of them could fall to them, even after moving down in the 2nd. On a coupla of my mocks, I lucked into two Edges. Sanders and Foskey in one. Foskey and Wall in another. I’ve kinda lost track at this point. ;>)

    A general feeling, though, about the edge position this year: I think guys who can play all three downs and have an impact will mostly be off the board by the early 70s. So there’s a limit to trading down, if the Rams want one. They also need corners, badly, so they’re probably going to have to use their first three picks for them. Might be pretty smart to draft two corners and an edge, or two edges and a corner, early. If they don’t garner extra picks, they’ve got a long wait for another chance.

     

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143427
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I responded, ZN. But the post didn’t go through. Probably didn’t like one of the links. Will check back tomorrow.

    in reply to: Can’t Believe Matt Taibbi Sold Out #143424
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I’d say this to Taibbi, if I could. In a nutshell: by all means blast the Dems when they deserve it. Question all authority, and go after any and all abusers of power. Go after the rich and the powerful, regardless of party, with ferocious intensity and the truth. Be fearless in the process. But never let the far worse of the two major parties use you to change the subject and play the victim, which is all Jim Jourdan (and Musk) and his despicable “weaponization of government” hearings do.

    He’s not trying to reform the Intel community, the FBI, the CIA, etc. etc. He and the GOP have no record of actual concern for government overreach unless the political right and Republicans are the perceived victims. All they want to do is to make sure they’re never held to account, and they’ve decided the best way to do that is to claim eternal victimhood and persecution by “the left.”  They hope that shuts down all further inquiries.

    If Taibbi can’t see how he’s being used . . . or worse, just doesn’t care, eff him.

    in reply to: Can’t Believe Matt Taibbi Sold Out #143423
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I bumped into this after I posted the above:

    Mehdi Hasan interviews Matt Taibbi:

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143422
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I think there are more than ten immediate or eventual starters in the haul above, and several depth-players would beat out current depth-players. The Rams get bigger, faster, more athletic. Athleticism is a major key to my choices.

     

    Your comments are welcome, etc.

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143421
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Another recent mock from me. Again, I know in the real world there aren’t going to be all of these trades . . . mostly cuz the Rams won’t find the trade partners they need, even if they wanted to make them. But I do hope they move down a few times early, in small increments, pick up extra picks, and then, perhaps, move back up later. There’s a ton of value to be had after the 1st round, and, unfortunately, in the part of the draft without any Rams’ picks. As it stands now, there’s a void between #77 and #167. I hope they fill it.

    The other issue is . . . I’m guessing . . . the Rams might not be able to pay all the guys I draft. They might prefer UDFA contracts instead. But I do think it would be great if they could draft more than a dozen. No team has fewer players under contract right now, etc.

    ____

    48
    Drew Sanders
    LB | Arkansas LogoArkansasTRADE

    75
    Gervon Dexter
    DL | Florida LogoFloridaTRADE

    77
    Julius Brents
    CB | Kansas State LogoKansas State

    119
    Jonathan Mingo
    WR | Mississippi LogoMississippiTRADE

    135
    Kendre Miller
    RB | TCU LogoTCUTRADE

    147
    Dontayvion Wicks
    WR | Virginia LogoVirginiaTRADE

    152
    Kobie Turner
    DL | Wake Forest LogoWake ForestTRADE

    158
    YaYa Diaby
    EDGE | Louisville LogoLouisvilleTRADE

    167
    Jon Gaines
    IOL | UCLA LogoUCLA

    171
    Brenton Strange
    TE | Penn State LogoPenn State

    174
    Riley Moss
    CB | Iowa LogoIowaTRADE

    177
    Israel Abanikanda
    RB | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburgh

    182
    Keaton Mitchell
    RB | East Carolina LogoEast Carolina

    184
    Jay Ward
    S | LSU LogoLSUTRADE

    189
    Chandler Zavala
    IOL | NC State LogoNC State

    191
    Braeden Daniels
    IOL | Utah LogoUtah

    223
    Carrington Valentine
    CB | Kentucky LogoKentucky

    224
    Yasir Abdullah
    LB | Louisville LogoLouisvilleTRADE

    228
    Andrei Iosivas
    WR | Princeton LogoPrincetonTRADE

    231
    Jason Taylor II
    S | Oklahoma State LogoOklahoma StateTRADE

    245
    Adam Korsak
    P | Rutgers LogoRutgersTRADE

    251
    Anfernee Orji
    LB | Vanderbilt LogoVanderbilt

    in reply to: Can’t Believe Matt Taibbi Sold Out #143420
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Zooey,

    Is that in reference to Taibbi being paid by Musk to lie to Americans about the non-existent corporate bias against conservatives — on Twitter and elsewhere? Or has he added something new to his shilling?

    Personally, I don’t take his shilling and lies as any sign we’re doomed. It was to be expected, as far as I’m concerned. Far too many fake-leftists/progressives have shown their true colors since Trump hit the political scene in full force. Greenwald is another recent example.

    (Basically, propertarians in sheep’s clothing. Just follow the money, etc.)

    And even those who honestly think it makes sense to join forces with the alt-right to take down “corporate Dems” were always playing a fool’s game. At best, they must have figured “the enemy of my enemy is my friend,” while forgetting the enormous difference in literal firepower and money behind the alt/far-right. As in, any leftist who thought a coalition of the real left and the far-right would eventually lead to a more progressive nation — because corporate Dems would supposedly be wiped out — truly doesn’t understand the power dynamics in America. It’s beyond obvious that the far-right is doing the using in this case, not those woefully naive leftists. As soon as the Dems are gone, the far-right will take out the real left next, entirely, and America will be completely fascist at that point.

    Again, the most logical coalition for we leftists, currently, is with the Dems, as distasteful as that may be. There isn’t a single issue in which the GOP is preferable right now, and there is absolutely zero chance that the Republican Party is amenable to progressive, much less leftist persuasion. We all know they’re fighting each other to be the most Trumpian, the most far-right, and they demonize and despise us with every breath they take. They flat out hate us. Why on earth would any sane leftist think it’s logical to join forces with them?

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143400
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I also like Chase Brown, but he’s supposed to go before Israel. I’d rather have the latter.

    Late in the draft, likely in the 170-192 range, hoping the Rams snag Keaton Mitchell. Gives them a speed back, good receiver, big play guy. Small. But that late in the Draft is where you should take that kind of chance. That’s where you draft a Tutu as well. Not in the 2nd round.

    Hunter Luepke for a throwback fullback would help them too. Also in that range.

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143399
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    One way to stabilize a team that needs to restock its defense and also needs to fix its OL after injuries is to bolster the running game, and that would include drafting a back this year. And as it turns out, if you don’t have a first round pick, you draft a back in rounds 2 or 3. There’s a persistent belief that you can draft backs lower than that. But the numbers don’t bear that out. I will look at 10 years, ending in 2021 (far enough back to get a good picture) and starting in 2012. I will count as a “hit” anyone who was productive at RB for at least 2 years. Rounds 2 & 3. Backs drafted: 54. Hits: 22. Percent: 41% Rounds 4-7. Backs drafted: 158. Hits: 20. Percent: 12.6% You’re more than 3 times more likely to get a productive back drafting them in rounds 2 and 3.

    As you can probably tell, I’m high on Israel Abanikanda. A 4.3 back with excellent size. Roughly 5’11”, 216. Probably can carry 225 and still be fast. Want the Rams to draft him. But it’s going to take some great chess from McSnead, IMO. Gotta make some really good trades. Trade down a few times and bank some extra picks, cuz they have to get a coupla edges and corners too.

    Looks like the consensus has Bijan Robinson as the only first-round-worthy back, but that may not stop some teams from going for others early. Personally, I think the next group of runners are too small or too slow. Hoping the Rams go in another direction.

    https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/big-boards/2023/consensus-big-board-2023?pos=RB

    You mention Kendre Miller. He’s not “fast,” but has good size and good tape as a Junior. Just 21 for the season is another big plus.

    in reply to: Ramsey trade #143395
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant
    TurfShowTimes@TurfShowTimes
    Jalen Ramsey assured Rams would get low return by forcing trade to Dolphins and saying he would make it costlier for any other team to acquire his services

    That tells me, as GM, keep him. And, yeah, I understand contract demands and the cap were serious issues, then and now. But the Rams made their own bed there, and Ramsey no doubt knew it. He knew that the Rams reacted all too emotionally after the Super Bowl and threw a ton of money at a few stars — Ramsey not being one of them. He knew that the contract for Stafford, especially, was absurd, given his injury history and age.

    I still would have kept Ramsey, if my return was just a 3rd and a mostly bench-sitting TE.

    Ramsey should have netted at least a 1st. At least for 2024. I would have taken a 3rd this year if the trade included a 1st next year. Something like that. But I’m keeping a Top-Three corner if the return is what they ended up with.

    in reply to: high time we had a gender thread #143359
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Recently read a very good novel, After Sappho, by Selby Wynn Schwartz .

    https://thebookerprizes.com/the-booker-library/books/after-sappho

    Innovative form. Basically, a series of interconnected vignettes, impressions, time capsules. Aside from its literary power, it’s a lesson in feminist and LGBTQ history, primarily focusing on late 19th century thru 1928.

    I learned a ton.

     

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143358
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant
    Adetomiwa Adebawore’s numbers are truly freakish.
    4.49
    Seconds
    10-Yard Split
    1.61
    Seconds
    Vertical Jump
    37.5’’
    Broad Jump
    10’ 5’’
    3-Cone Drill
    20-Yd Shuttle
    Bench Press
    27
    Rep
    _____
    Jonathan Mingo’s numbers are crazy,  too. Much better than Deebo’s. He’s 6’2″, 225:
    40-Yard Dash
    4.46
    Seconds
    10-Yard Split
    1.54
    Seconds
    Vertical Jump
    39.5’’
    Broad Jump
    10’ 9’’
    3-Cone Drill
    20-Yd Shuttle
    Bench Press
    22
    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143357
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Quick sidenote: I’ve seen some reports that the Rams are high on Calijah Kancey, at DT.

    Personally, I’d much rather wait and take Gervon Dexter instead. Most boards have the latter going a round or two later than Kancey. Much bigger, taller, and has more upside, IMO. I think they should grab the best edge first, IMO — unless Deonte Banks falls to them at 36.

    It’s also interesting to me that Adetomiwa Adebawore, an edge, is basically the same size as Kancey, roughly 6’1″, 280, but far more athletic, quicker, faster. Strong, too. Put up 27 for the bench. Makes sense to me to move him to DT. Get him to add a bit of good weight, and you have your Donald clone.

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143356
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I did my best to make every trade comply with the standard trade value chart. Again, on that particular mock simulator, unlike most of them, you get flooded with amazing offers that tend to be far too generous. Even later in the process, all kinds of offers for 2024 early round swaps for late 2023 picks, which I’d jump on if I were GM.

    I ignored all of those and made my own trades.

    The above draft makes the Rams faster, far more athletic, and fills most of their needs. The only spot I probably missed is the TE position, which I thought I could deal with later. Davis Allen is often still there late but wasn’t this time. So I picked Elijah Higgins instead . . . a really big wideout who probably should convert to a smallish move TE. He’d be the Rams’ Gerald Everett, etc.

    Also, I think most of the picks are possible for their timing, except for DJ Turner. He’s likely gone in the 2nd round. Mingo is another one who may go earlier. Big receiver, with speed, toughness, and athleticism. He could be the Rams’ Deebo.

     

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143355
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Here’s another of my mock drafts, from . . .

    https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/

    Trade Recap
    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 43
    2023: Round 4, Pick 112
    New York Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 36
    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 45
    2023: Round 5, Pick 170
    Green Bay Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 43
    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 49
    2023: Round 4, Pick 120
    Pittsburgh Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 45
    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 4, Pick 128
    2023: Round 5, Pick 172
    2023: Round 7, Pick 240
    2023: Round 7, Pick 243
    2023: Round 7, Pick 254
    New York Receives:
    2023: Round 4, Pick 120
    2023: Round 6, Pick 189

    My Selections
    49
    Trenton Simpson
    LB | Clemson LogoClemsonTRADE

    69
    Gervon Dexter
    DL | Florida LogoFlorida

    77
    D.J. Turner
    CB | Michigan LogoMichigan

    112
    Blake Freeland
    OT | BYU LogoBYUTRADE

    128
    Israel Abanikanda
    RB | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburghTRADE

    167
    Jonathan Mingo
    WR | Mississippi LogoMississippi

    170
    Braeden Daniels
    IOL | Utah LogoUtahTRADE

    171
    Jon Gaines
    IOL | UCLA LogoUCLA

    172
    Carrington Valentine
    CB | Kentucky LogoKentuckyTRADE

    177
    Jason Taylor II
    S | Oklahoma State LogoOklahoma State

    182
    Keaton Mitchell
    RB | East Carolina LogoEast Carolina

    191
    YaYa Diaby
    EDGE | Louisville LogoLouisville

    223
    Brandon Hill
    S | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburgh

    240
    Elijah Higgins
    WR | Stanford LogoStanfordTRADE

    243
    Yasir Abdullah
    LB | Louisville LogoLouisvilleTRADE

    251
    Rejzohn Wright
    CB | Oregon State LogoOregon State

    254
    Bryce Baringer
    P | Michigan State LogoMichigan StateTRADE

     

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143343
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Apologies for flooding the zone here, but multiple links per post will likely trigger the software.

    Wanted to post an aggregate site for the Big Boards. There’s never consensus among the scouts for all players, of course, and the differences grow the further down the list of players you get. All over the map sometimes. Wildly different, etc.

    https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/big-boards/2023/consensus-big-board-2023

    Click on the individual players and you get an extensive breakdown of those differences from the major draft sites.

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143342
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant
    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143341
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    The weakness of the above is probably the lack of O-line. Just a good center (Stromberg), who should start for the Rams. My other mocks usually go for at least three O-line guys. But it’s a lot tougher if I stick to the trade chart value. If the mock showers me with crazy good trade offers — which isn’t going to happen in real life — then I have an embarrassment of riches, etc.

    I am one of those who thinks that they don’t need OL this draft though they will probably take 1 or 2. They have so many players coming back from injury on the OL, they are in a good position. Odds are you don’t have injury situations like last year that often–meaning that they can assume that the group will be relatively healthier. In that bunch they have a number of players who showed something even though they didn’t get than many games. I am not even sure they need a center. If Allen can’t go Shelton was fine and it’s no accident he’s one of the few players they re-signed.

    I can see that view. But the O-line draft is really loaded this year, even late into the draft. The Rams have the opportunity to get more athletic there, and at least find better depth. But in the real world, they probably have other priorities, at least early.

    I’d rather they get a couple of edges and two corners early, and go Defense. They need safeties too. But I’d be shocked if McSnead avoid the Offense. Likely a receiver or two. Abanikanda (RB), as mentioned (and Mitchell) would be great picks, IMO.

     

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143338
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    The second one is pure fantasy, primarily cuz the Rams would never get all of  those trades, even if they wanted to make them. It’s a lot easier to make a huge number of them online. I’m guessing it’s extremely difficult to make volume trades happen as the draft progresses. But it’s a great draft, and would reset the entire team and make them instantly competitive.

    I see at least 11 new starters, and nearly all the draftees with the potential for rookie snaps. I think Mingo will be good enough at receiver to allow the Rams to trade Jefferson, if they want to. Great size and athleticism. A bigger Deebo Samuels. Abanikanda makes Akers expendable. Bigger and much faster. So I’d start Israel, and use Luepke (FB) for short yardage, and Mitchell as the speedy change of pace back. Really hoping the Rams draft Mitchell. Extremely quick and fast, he’d be a dynamic home-run threat for McVay.

    The O-line gets new starters, Stromberg, Daniels, and Bradford (or Richards). Juice gives them a solid backup at center.

    Two new starters each at safety, corner, edge, punter. One new starter at DT and linebacker. Solid rotational edge, corner, and receiver.

    Normally, if a team gets three or four starters, and keeps five or six players from a draft, it’s a good one. This one likely nails all but a couple.

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143336
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    This is a combination of me making fair trades, and accepting a few crazy trades offered to me:

    ___

    7 Round – 1 Team: Mock Draft
    03/30/23

    Trade Recap
    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 44
    2023: Round 3, Pick 75
    2023: Round 4, Pick 110
    2023: Round 5, Pick 159
    2023: Round 7, Pick 225
    Atlanta Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 36

    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 46
    2023: Round 6, Pick 184
    2023: Round 7, Pick 245
    New England Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 44

    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 53
    2023: Round 2, Pick 64
    2023: Round 3, Pick 103
    Chicago Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 46

    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 4, Pick 111
    2023: Round 5, Pick 140
    2023: Round 7, Pick 229
    Cleveland Receives:
    2023: Round 3, Pick 103

    My Selections
    53
    Jack Campbell
    LB | Iowa LogoIowaTRADE

    64
    Tuli Tuipulotu
    DL | USC LogoUSCTRADE

    69
    D.J. Turner
    CB | Michigan LogoMichigan

    75
    Gervon Dexter
    DL | Florida LogoFloridaTRADE

    77
    Zach Harrison
    EDGE | Ohio State LogoOhio State

    110
    J.L. Skinner
    S | Boise State LogoBoise StateTRADE

    111
    Jartavius Martin
    S | Illinois LogoIllinoisTRADE

    140
    Israel Abanikanda
    RB | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburghTRADE

    159
    Jonathan Mingo
    WR | Mississippi LogoMississippiTRADE

    167
    Braeden Daniels
    IOL | Utah LogoUtah

    171
    Ricky Stromberg
    IOL | Arkansas LogoArkansas

    177
    Daniel Scott
    S | California LogoCalifornia

    182
    Keaton Mitchell
    RB | East Carolina LogoEast Carolina

    184
    Hunter Luepke
    RB | North Dakota State LogoNorth Dakota StateTRADE

    189
    Cory Trice
    CB | Purdue LogoPurdue

    191
    Bryce Ford-Wheaton
    WR | West Virginia LogoWest Virginia

    223
    Asim Richards
    IOL | North Carolina LogoNorth Carolina

    225
    Juice Scruggs
    IOL | Penn State LogoPenn StateTRADE

    229
    Anthony Bradford
    IOL | LSU LogoLSUTRADE

    245
    Yasir Abdullah
    LB | Louisville LogoLouisvilleTRADE

    251
    Bryce Baringer
    P | Michigan State LogoMichigan State

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143335
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    The weakness of the above is probably the lack of O-line. Just a good center (Stromberg), who should start for the Rams. My other mocks usually go for at least three O-line guys. But it’s a lot tougher if I stick to the trade chart value. If the mock showers me with crazy good trade offers — which isn’t going to happen in real life — then I have an embarrassment of riches, etc.

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143334
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/team-mock-drafts/2023

    This is one where I refrained from the crazy good trade offers and made my own instead, going by the trade chart. Of course, I’m not really sure if NFL GMs actually use that anymore.

    ____

    Trade Recap
    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 43
    2023: Round 4, Pick 112
    New York Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 36

    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 46
    2023: Round 4, Pick 135
    2023: Round 6, Pick 210
    New England Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 43 2023:
    Round 6, Pick 191

    Los Angeles Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 50
    2023: Round 5, Pick 153
    2023: Round 6, Pick 196
    Tampa Bay Receives:
    2023: Round 2, Pick 46

    ___

    My Selections
    50
    Drew Sanders
    LB | Arkansas LogoArkansasTRADE

    69
    Zach Harrison
    EDGE | Ohio State LogoOhio State

    77
    D.J. Turner
    CB | Michigan LogoMichigan

    112
    Colby Wooden
    DL | Auburn LogoAuburnTRADE

    135
    Israel Abanikanda
    RB | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburghTRADE

    153
    Jonathan Mingo
    WR | Mississippi LogoMississippiTRADE

    167
    Jakorian Bennett
    CB | Maryland LogoMaryland

    171
    Ricky Stromberg
    IOL | Arkansas LogoArkansas

    177
    Davis Allen
    TE | Clemson LogoClemson

    182
    Keaton Mitchell
    RB | East Carolina LogoEast Carolina

    189
    Andrei Iosivas
    WR | Princeton LogoPrinceton

    196
    Brandon Hill
    S | Pittsburgh LogoPittsburghTRADE

    210
    Chamarri Conner
    S | Virginia Tech LogoVirginia TechTRADE

    223
    Rejzohn Wright
    CB | Oregon State LogoOregon State

    251
    Lonnie Phelps
    EDGE | Kansas LogoKansas

    (I’m guessing DJ Turner won’t be there at 77. Other than that, I think it’s realistic too, except for the volume of trades.)

    in reply to: Rams 2023 draft #143332
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    That’s a pretty good mock for the Rams. Big fan, especially, of the DJ Turner and Israel Abanikanda picks. Though after the latter’s recent Pro Day, I highly doubt he’ll last until 167.  They both make the Rams a great deal faster and more athletic.

    Rams met with Pitt RB Israel Abanikanda before outstanding pro day performance

    Ryan Fowler
    @_RyanFowler_
    Pitt RB Izzy Abanikanda met with the 49ers, Rams, and Cardinals yesterday evening, per source.

    Fresh off an outstanding Pro Day this morning where he jumped 41″ in the vert, 10’8″ in the broad, and ran mid 4.3s(u) in the 40, he’s had himself an excellent 24 hours.

    Felix Anudike-Uzomah should be a good Edge as well. Solid draft.

    Have been having fun with NFL mock draft simulators. Almost addicted at this point. :>) I like www profootballnetwork dot com and www nflmockdatabase dot com. PFF’s is now subscription only, so I don’t bother with that one anymore.

    Whenever possible, I pick DJ Turner and Israel, and that was before his Pro Day.

    The first on the list is much tougher on trades for the home team, but I still make them. As in, the algorithm is set to “decline” trades even if they meet the standards of the value chart. The second site, however, is much too generous to the home team, so I’ve been trying to force trades closer to the value chart — to be fair and all.

    My recent mocks involve a ton of trades, far more than the norm. But since it’s all just fantasy stuff, why not? I’ve had a few that, in my not so humble opinion, would set the Rams up for a dynasty!

    ;>)
    in reply to: Rams & free agency #143278
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    The Rams may be just clearing enough cap space to sign Chris Massey.

     

    I was hoping for Madison “Hedgehog” Hedgecock.

    This may be yet another McVay revolution. Strip the team of 99% of the roster, and then field three players on offense and defense. It would confuse the opposing coach so much they’d throw up their hands, walk off the field in a Sam Huff, and, essentially, forfeit. So the Rams would go 17 and 0, and cruise through the playoffs and win the Super Bowl via forfeit too.

    This will only work for one season, though, of course. Eventually the Data crunchers will figure it all out, and use their ChatGen7.0 to rewrite the rules. But the Rams will win one more for the Flipper.

     

    in reply to: The Rams they are a-changin… w/ a big 10/5 update #143254
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Another quick point. I’m gonna try to ask Jourdan in a comments section:

    The Rams really count on their comp picks. Those are essential building blocks for their team-building model. But when you release players, you’re not eligible for any comps. So why do it? Or, at the very least, why pre-negotiate against yourself, and announce publicly that “If we can’t trade X, we’ll release him”?

    (Seems obvious that most teams will just wait until they’re released, etc.)

    Doesn’t strike me as smart chess.

     

    in reply to: The Rams they are a-changin… w/ a big 10/5 update #143253
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Agreed, WV.

    And good points, ZN. Had forgotten about her take on Goff. I can see the “access” problem there. But, as you both mention, on balance? She’s the best the Rams have had, at least in my lifetime. We’d likely need a Waterfield to help us out with the old LA beat writers back in the day. Don’t know how good they were . . .

    Most of us here are nomads, I’m guessing. I started as an East Coast fan back in 1966, and without the Internet in existence, didn’t see LA Times journalism — or St Louis — until the 1990s. Basically missed roughly 30 years of it. Relied primarily on Sports Illustrated, Sports Magazine, Washington Post, and a few other outlets here and there. Always bought those NFL magazines that previewed the new season, like Athlons, too. Really looked forward to those. Plus, the occasional TV games, etc. etc.

    But at least from the Internet era onward, yeah, she’s the best. And she’s humble. I like that about her.

Viewing 30 posts - 241 through 270 (of 4,288 total)