Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 211 through 240 (of 4,298 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Picks 174 and 175 …McClendon OT, Allen TE #143717
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Brugler has Allen as a 3rd-4th rounder. Should be an excellent Red Zone TE for the Rams. Highly skilled at contested catches, with a 38.5 vert.

    Less high on McClendon (6th rounder), but others liked him more. Consensus was 5th rounder. Should improve their depth at guard and right tackle, at least.

    in reply to: Rams pick 161 … Hampton, LB #143715
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    From Brugler’s scouting review. Had him as a 3rd-4th rounder:

    COMBINE 6022 236 33 5/8 9 1/2 80 5/8 4.58 2.61 1.55 35 1/2 10’0” – – – (no shuttle, 3-cone, bench – right toe)
    PRO DAY 6023 239 33 9 1/2 81 – – – – – – – – (no testing – right toe)

    STRENGTHS: Explosive first step, and his race to the corner can get tackles off balance … instinctive snap anticipation and rarely loses sight of the football … displays
    the lower-body flexibility to bend and make sharp cuts in his pass rush … nimble, efficient looper … allows his length to work for him with a forceful long-arm move …
    uses forward lean to access speed-to-power opportunities and free himself from blocks … outstanding pursuit from the backside … experienced peeling off and
    defending zones … improved weight transfer as a tackler in 2022 boosted his finishing batting average … voted a senior captain … above-average backfield production
    and his 11.0 sacks in 2021 was the most for an Appalachian State player since the school moved up to the FBS

    in reply to: day 3 #143713
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Jourdan said the Rams had interest in wideout Justin Shorter, an ironic name, given his 6’4″ height. He went sooner than many expected. I also liked Kyu Blu Kelly and Daniel Scott at corner and safety. Gone.

    Dontayvion Wicks was another favorite at wideout. Gone. Antonio Johnson was considered a first or second round safety not that long ago. Also gone.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143699
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    they need a backup qb. i just question whether he would have been available later.

    He would have. And most scouts would argue he wasn’t the best available QB. They had much bigger needs to fill at that spot, and several talented players sitting there who won’t be there when the Rams draft again at #161.

    no i agree with you. that’s why i disagree with the pick. i think the rams could have waited. i thought this was pretty funny.

    <script async=”” src=”https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js&#8221; charset=”utf-8″></script>

    Hopefully that’s sarcasm, from a Bengal fan?

    ;>)

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143710
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Some more of my favorites now off the board:

    Darius Rush, Cam Mitchell, Abanikanda, Abdullah. The first two are likely upgrades at corner; Abanikanda likely upgrade the running back position; Abdullah likely upgrades the linebacker/edge position.

    Oh, well.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143709
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    ZN,

    They don’t know other teams’s boards and they have no idea if he would be there at the bottom of the 5th.

    I’d argue that focusing on just one player makes the drafter a “purist.” Being open to a wide range of players, positions, needs, and “scheme-versatility,” guards against that.

    Zeroing in on just one guy can’t help but blind the drafter to the dozens of quite possibly better players, who may offer the potential for immediate upgrades.

    Do you think the Rams see Stetson as a potential upgrade to Stafford? I’m betting no. Whenever possible, with each pick, that should be first and foremost on the minds of the FO. Does this player offer a good chance at an upgrade?

    Of course, if a team is stacked with a ton of talent, they can move on much sooner to “depth.” But the Rams aren’t one of those teams right now. They have multiple holes at starter. They shouldn’t worry about depth until they upgrade their starters.

    Triage. The Draft is kinda like a triage unit. Take care of the most immediate needs first, in descending order through each pick, each round.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143705
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    The thing is when you take him. His potential “fit” is beside the point. Take him in the 4th and you lose out on players at positions of immediate need. As in, potential starters. Wait for known backups. Those guys will still be there after the potential starters are long gone.

    i agree.

    And just a side-note on critiquing these picks. Looking at comments on another board made me think about this again . . .

    I fully realize that the Rams . . .

    A: Have their own players’ board
    B: Have inside knowledge we’ll never know
    C: Understand their own schemes and fits and needs better than we fans.

    I get all of that. However, they’re human, and they make mistakes, and their track record in recent years isn’t exactly all that great, having cut a ton of their own draft picks, etc. etc. How many picks have even made it through their rookie contracts in recent years? Not many. And they tend not to re-sign most of the rest.

    (Plus, schemes change. Coaches leave. Nothing is forever in the NFL)

    In short, I think criticism is warranted at times, and no team’s FO is above it. IMO, the Rams’ FO all too often plays poor chess on Draft Day, and we see the results. In relative terms, not that many guys left from the Super Bowl team, which still kinda stuns me when I think about it . . .

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143697
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Bennett has backup potential for a timing-based passing attack that includes concepts often seen in the Shanahan offense.

    There’s your answer.

    The thing is when you take him. His potential “fit” is beside the point. Take him in the 4th and you lose out on players at positions of immediate need. As in, potential starters.

    Wait for known backups. Those guys will still be there after the potential starters are long gone.

     

     

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143694
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    they need a backup qb. i just question whether he would have been available later.

    He would have. And most scouts would argue he wasn’t the best available QB.

    They had much bigger needs to fill at that spot, and several talented players sitting there who won’t be there when the Rams draft again at #161.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143692
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Brugler gives him a 6th round grade, and he’ll turn 26 this year.

    So, I guess the Rams are just fine being awful in the secondary. One starting-caliber corner, in Durant; a starting-caliber safety in Fuller; and then, basically, a bunch of JAGs.

    Still no #2 for Kupp, and Akers is still a question mark. Which Akers will show up? etc. etc.

    I don’t think the Rams’ Draft room knows what it’s doing, and with their recent track record of cutting a lot of their picks, that’s borne out in the real world.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 128 … Bennett, qb #143687
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Stupid pick. Truly stupid. With all the holes they have on this team, and all the starters they still need to add?

    They go for a backup QB, under six feet?

     

    in reply to: day 3 #143683
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Got to take Darius Rush. Second choice, Israel Abanikanda.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 77 … Young, edge #143673
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I think his age lowers his eval a bit among scouts, even though as mentioned above, he likely hasn’t taken the punishment of his age peers. Far fewer snaps, etc. His height hurts him a bit, too.

    If he were 23 and 6’4″, he’s probably top 10 among the edges, easily. Guessing 6 or 7 on Brugler’s list, instead of 17, with a 1st-2nd round grade, instead of 3rd-4th.

    But, again, NFL team boards are waaay different from the boards we see from public draft gurus. Jourdan has been hinting about that difference lately, from her insider-access position, among other aspects of the Draft. Apparently, that access brings a lot of perks, but she can’t tell us about them — yet.

    I like the pick, and Avila’s. Just wish Young really were younger, and could suddenly morph into 6’4″, 6’5″.

    ;>)

    in reply to: Rams pick at 89 … Turner, DT #143672
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    The interview vid in the last post…Turner is a very impressive guy.

    Looks like they got a highly intelligent, creative, hard-working player, with very healthy interests outside of football. But I’m just not so sure they got the best football player possible at that moment in the Draft. Not sure he was the BPA, or fills the most pressing need for the team.

    But he does seem like he has major intangibles all over the place. Should develop into a key locker-room guy, etc, and will lead by example. You can build a good team with guys like that.

    in reply to: Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS #143642
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Another way to go (pre-trade) might have been: Keep Goff, get him more weapons, protect him better, coach him up, and rebuild his confidence. Far less costly and better long term, IMO.

    I think that’s all true but McV was not the patient coach who was going to coach Goff up. McV seems to be better with vets.

    Agreed. McVay lacks patience. Brilliant coach, but impulsive and mercurial, at times. One might even say “fickle” in his football affections. But, I’m still very glad he’s the coach. Just hope he finds a way to smooth the rough edges.

    He might be an excellent candidate for a Zen master to coach him up. Zazen can do wonders.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 89 … Turner, DT #143640
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    i don’t like this pick. one year of so so production. meh. now hopefully he proves me completely wrong.

    Also agreed. I always hope I’m wrong when I have a negative view of a pick. Want this kid to be great and make the doubters, like meself, eat proverbial crow, etc.

    But, right now, I’m thinking the Rams had better options, even at DT, if they wanted to go that route. Colby Wooden or Moro Ojomo, for instance. I’m thinking the Rams fell in love with Turner’s story. They really, really need corners, though, and safeties, and another edge, and more O-line. Chandler Zavala might have been really good there. Avila was an excellent pick — at guard or center. Zavala is likely just a guard. Top flight. Like Braeden Daniels, Nick Salvideri, and Anthony Bradford too.

    CB: Darius Rush, Bennett, and Cory Rice.

     

    in reply to: Rams pick at 77 … Young, edge #143638
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Just a guess. But Young may be relatively young in football years, cuz he was away from the game for a bit. Doesn’t have the wear and tear of most players his age (25).

    YEAR (GP/GS) TKLS TFL SACK FF PD INT NOTES
    2017: Gulf Coast Sports Academy (Ala.) Only played in two games before leaving the program
    2018: Out of football
    2019: Georgia Military College
    2020: Georgia Military College Season was canceled (COVID), but he practiced with the team
    2021: (11/8) 46 11.5 5.5 0 2 1 Tennessee; Led team in TFL, sacks; Enrolled in January 2021; Missed first two games (ruled ineligible)
    2022: (13/13) 37 12.0 7.0 0 0 0 Tennessee; First Team All-SEC; Led team in sacks
    Total: (24/21) 83 23.5 12.5 0 2 1CONTENTS

    in reply to: Rams pick at 89 … Turner, DT #143634
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Looks like the monster TE, Darnell Washington, finally came off the board, to Pittsburgh. If memory serves, more than a few Rams fans wanted him in horns. He does have massive potential, given his size and athleticism.

    in reply to: Rams pick at 89 … Turner, DT #143633
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    This draft has proven one thing. Well, it’s re-proven what we already knew: NFL teams don’t have the same boards as the draft “experts” and mock sims. All kinds of players went well before their supposed slot, and some, like Drew Sanders and Trenton Simpson, well after it.

    A ton of surprises, both for how early and how late, etc.

     

     

    in reply to: Rams pick at 89 … Turner, DT #143632
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    i wanted adebawore. but what do i know? none of the other teams are selecting him.

    Agreed. I think Adebawore should have been the pick. Or Ringo. Or Kelee Ringo. Or Jakorius Bennett, from Maryland. Or Dawand Jones, tackle. Lotsa better choices, IMO.

     

    in reply to: Rams rounds 2 & 3 (w/ “best players left” list) #143580
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/2023-nfl-draft-insider-notes-steelers-could-be-key-to-ending-will-levis-fall-plus-jaguars-impress-in-round-1/

    This mock gives the Rams Keion White, Nick Saldiveri, and Jonathan Mingo, with no trade downs. It also has Seattle taking
    Adetomiwa Adebawore one pick later, after White. I’d much rather have Adebawore, but White will be a serious upgrade at edge.

    Adebawore is potentially an even more athletic Aaron Donald — who could also play edge — with roughly the same height/weight profile. But his testing, for what that’s worth, was otherwordly.

    HT WT ARM HAND WING 40-YD 20-YD 10-YD VJ BJ SS 3C BP

    6015 282 33 7/8 10 1/2 81 5/8 4.49 2.62 1.55 37 1/2 10’5” – – 27

    It’s a bonus that he’s just 22. White will turn 25 as a rookie, if the Rams make the playoffs.

    Would be very happy with both 3rd round picks. Potential starter at offensive tackle, and a great running mate for Kupp, with #1 upside.

    But I’d rather they trade down at #36.

    in reply to: Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS #143579
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    All in all, if we’re talking about feeling really good about a team’s long term future via the QB? On the NFC side, I’m guessing just two teams feel honestly confident:

    Philly and Chicago. And Philly had a crazy good 1st round yesterday, adding Jalen Carter and Nolan Smith to an already solid defense. Ray Charles in the City of Brotherly Love, with all of those kids from Athens. Chicago likely gave Fields a major upgrade at right tackle in Darnell Wright.

    AFC does better on that score right now. First five teams listed, and the seventh, would be my guess.

    in reply to: Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS #143578
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Placing Stafford #11 is ridiculous. He has Trey Lance/Brock Purdy rated higher than Matthew Stafford, the ONLY name on that list to win a Super Bowl. Jordan Love is rated higher than Stafford. Jordan Love. The man with 606 yards passing in his CAREER. Jalen Hurts and Jared Goff are the only other QBs in the conference who ever played clutch in a game that mattered. Ever.

    I think it’s too low for Stafford as well. Good point on Lance, Purdy, and Love. Lance and Purdy don’t really belong together, either, cuz the latter actually played enough to get an idea of his game. Lance hasn’t. I put Lance down toward the bottom, with a big old question mark. Stafford is better right now, from what we know. I’d say a lot better.

    Also, Geno Smith has just that one good season. Yes, he was excellent last year, but it’s his first time, basically, showing up like that. I’d put Stafford ahead of him too. If we factor in age, recent injuries, etc. etc. I’d put Stafford at #6 going into this season (with a potential range up to #2). Would also move Murray up to #7. Geno goes to #8. Love, Lance, and Ridder round out the bottom.

    The AFC side looks a bit more realistic, though I think the author has Wilson too low. He’ll snap back, I’m guessing. Maybe 8th or 9th.

     

    in reply to: Rams rounds 2 & 3 (w/ “best players left” list) #143573
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Big clusters of talent this year make it logical for trade downs, if the Rams can find partners. They may not be able to. But if they do, it’s key that they maximize the value. They shouldn’t be easy marks in those trades. Just keep the pick if they’re gonna be overly generous to other teams.

    Tie breakers for me: Size/speed/athleticism, age, and leadership, etc. If the cluster has a bunch of guys rated in a similar way, I’m giving extra points to players with better size and athletic traits, then younger players, and intangibles. That’s not set in concrete, of course. The Rams should be flexible. As in, if the intangibles just fly off the charts . . . move them up. But, I think athleticism is a priority, and younger players typically give you a better window of time for peak performance, plus have room to grow, etc. etc.

    Conversely, I’m going to ding ratings if a player is 25, has documented “character” issues, and a lack of athletic traits, etc.

    I know. It’s kinda crazy to obsess about the Draft. There are worse vices, right?

    ;>)

    in reply to: Rams rounds 2 & 3 (w/ “best players left” list) #143572
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Jalin Hyatt, WR, Tennessee

    Hyatt is often described by analysts as a “home run hitter,” but do you draft that player in the second round with so many needs elsewhere? If you’re the Rams, you might consider it if you’re still unsure about Tutu Atwell, plus No. 2 receiver Van Jefferson is in a contract year.

    Josh Downs, WR, North Carolina

    The Rams have struggled to find a place for Atwell, another undersized prospect (though Downs has almost 20 more pounds on his 5-foot-8 frame), but the intriguing aspect of Downs’ game is his utter control of all his gears, which helps him get very, very open even in the crowded middle of the field. The Rams don’t need to find a replacement for Cooper Kupp’s slot production just yet, but eventually they will.

    Cedric Tillman, WR, Tennessee

    Tillman is a big, friendly quarterback target with great hands but he may be more suited for downfield (or as Brugler puts it) “linear” concepts.

    Trey Palmer, WR, Nebraska

    Palmer is a deep threat with blazing speed but a longer, larger frame. His skill set is the type I keep an eye on with Jefferson entering a contract year.

    Adetomiwa Adebawore, DL, Northwestern

    I love Adebawore’s versatility and potential in the NFL. He seems like an ideal rushing partner for Donald, plus he could really develop into a unique pass-rushing threat himself. I think scouts will look more at the projection of what he can become (Adebawore totaled a 9.83 raw athletic score, which puts him No. 46 among all defensive linemen since 1983 in terms of athletic traits) than what his numbers were at Northwestern. Analysts say he’s a high-character guy, too. Adebawore is “my guy” in this draft class and a player I don’t think the Rams can miss out on if he’s anywhere near a pick point.

    Keeanu Benton, DL, Wisconsin

    Benton plays with a ton of power and maneuvers space, which is what the Rams need on the interior alongside Donald.

    Siaki Ika, DL, Baylor

    The Rams do not have a space-eating nose tackle, and Ika could plug into their defensive line pretty early in his career.

    Zacch Pickens, DL, South Carolina

    Pickens blends strength and quickness at the position and could develop into a steady pass rusher.

    Cody Mauch, G/T, North Dakota State

    Brugler notes that Mauch has above-average hands and competitiveness, two hard-to-come-by traits for a prospect who could start early in his NFL career.

    Steve Avila, G/C, TCU

    Avila is less of the mold of undersized centers that the Rams have gravitated toward in recent years but can also be a stout guard if need be.

    Joe Tippmann, C, Wisconsin

    Tippmann’s range as a blocker seems like an ideal fit for the offensive system (especially the run game) traditionally run by Kyle Shanahan and Sean McVay. But does his skill set translate into the Rams’ offensive plan in 2023? If he’s a true target, that tells us a lot about the schematic direction of that offense.

    John Michael Schmitz, C, Minnesota

    Ya da da da da da da … (let me know in the comments if you get this one). Schmitz’s tenacity and wrestling background remind me of Rams center Brian Allen, whose injury history has created a need to explore more depth at the position.

    in reply to: Rams rounds 2 & 3 (w/ “best players left” list) #143571
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Michael Mayer, TE, Notre Dame

    Mayer skews at the moment as a pass-catching tight end who could use a little more development but has a lot of potential in that phase that will be hard for a team to pass on early in the second round.

    Tucker Kraft, TE, South Dakota State

    Kraft’s size, versatility and ability to create yards after the catch all fit a major Rams position need, even if he’s still in need of development.

    Sam LaPorta, TE, Iowa

    LaPorta has picked up just about every job a skill player can do on the field (including wildcat snaps) and is quick to create space in the short and intermediate layers of the field.

    Darnell Washington, TE, Georgia

    Washington is still raw as a prospect but has all the versatile traits a team could want out of a do-it-all tight end.

    Luke Schoonmaker, TE, Michigan

    Schoonmaker isn’t the flashiest of the tight end class (he does many things fine instead of a few things at an elite level) but has enough size and speed to project as a steady contributor.

    BJ Ojulari, edge, LSU

    Ojulari’s length and speed are a good match for a defense that needs at least one pass rusher to help take attention off of Aaron Donald.

    Keion White, edge, Georgia Tech

    Brugler calls White “scheme-proof” and solid against the run as well as a player with high upside as a pass rusher.

    Derick Hall, edge, Auburn

    Analysts say Hall is a high-character player, which would be a great fit for a defense that will be super young and untested in 2023. He may be more of a “power” rusher, which is fine if the Rams are married to the combination of Daniel Hardy and Michael Hoecht as speed rushers on the other side.

    Isaiah Foskey, edge, Notre Dame

    Foskey was a popular match for the Rams from another of our draft analysts, Diante Lee, because he could plug in immediately even while still developing (and he wouldn’t be a reach, so the Rams could still trade back and grab him).

    YaYa Diaby, edge, Louisville

    Diaby has a great speed/power combination but, per Brugler, definitely needs to develop more setup strategies for breaking down blockers.

    Zach Harrison, edge, Ohio State

    Harrison is Brugler’s No. 74-ranked prospect because he plays with some stiffness but has a ton of power and linear speed.

    in reply to: Rams rounds 2 & 3 (w/ “best players left” list) #143570
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I like Jourdan’s Best Available list, too. Has brief analysis on key players.

    https://theathletic.com/4462849/2023/04/28/nfl-draft-best-available-rams/

    Subscription necessary. Will copy and paste a couple:

    Joey Porter Jr., CB, Penn State

    Many were surprised Porter fell out of the first round. The Athletic’s lead draft analyst Dane Brugler noted in his report on Porter that at times, he can be undisciplined and it’s not totally clear whether the Rams are even looking for a press corner. He’s hugely gifted and among the best available players left, so he is listed here.

    Kelee Ringo, CB, Georgia

    Again, not sure Ringo would fall into the second round. He matches a great combination of athletic traits at a position of huge need.

    Cam Smith, CB, South Carolina

    The Rams have previously dipped successfully into their South Carolina pipeline (Ernest Jones). Smith is athletic, smart, coverage-versatile and projects well into ideally a more aggressive match zone.

    Julius Brents, CB, Kansas State

    I’ll be interested to see which round Brents is selected in, as the buzz on him has been all over the place. While Brents’ length and short-area speed projects well into a predominantly man-coverage cornerback, I’d be intrigued by what that skill set could mean in tightening up what is supposed to be an aggressive route-matching predominantly zone defense.

    Cameron Mitchell, CB, Northwestern

    Mitchell’s competitiveness and scheme versatility seem like a good fit for what will be a young Rams defense.
    go-deeper

    in reply to: Rams rounds 2 & 3 (w/ “best players left” list) #143569
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I think it’s pretty obvious that the Rams need edges, corners, DT, and O-line help. But they also really, really need another TE, a running mate for Kupp, two safeties, a punter, and a kicker . . . though some may think the latter two positions are best handled via Priority Free Agents. That’s definitely the case with long snapper.

    A luxury pick, of sorts, but one that could pay major dividends, would be another running back. Would love if they could land Israel Abanikanda, Tank Bigsby, or Roschon Johnson.

    As for the top section: Joey Porter would be a major, positive surprise at DB. He was supposed to go early in Round One. But I’d be very happy with Tyrique Stevenson if Porter is gone, and they can get him later, after a trade down. Darius Rush would probably be my second choice after Stevenson. Both players are big, fast, athletic. At Edge, I think they can get Isaiah Foskey or Zack Harrison later too, and fix that issue. Major upgrades for the Rams. Most rate Keion White, BJ Olujari, and Derick Hall before them, but they’d all be upgrades.

    Jonathan Mingo is my pick for Kupp’s running mate, and he’s flown up draft boards in the last month. Rashee Rice is another option. Later, perhaps on Day Three, the Rams should try to snag Andrei Iosovas. Height, size, speed guy who has flown up draft boards.

    More later . . .

     

    in reply to: Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS #143561
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    but no guarantee of the superbowl. i think i would go with the superbowl and stafford. i don’t know if stafford comes back this year. i don’t know how he stays upright… hopefully, he’s got another five years in him…

    Well, we’re talking about the thinking going into the trade, not after the fact. As in, there was no guarantee they’d win the Super Bowl with Stafford, and no reason to believe they couldn’t win it with Goff. Goff had a track record of making it to the Big Dance. Stafford didn’t.

    In short, it was a gamble either way.

     

    in reply to: Top QBs, by Conference, According to CBS #143551
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Interesting. Just one ranking, of course. Lotsa different opinions elsewhere, especially as you get further down the list. But the obvious leap-off-the-page thing is Goff versus Stafford, at least for Rams fans. #5 versus #11.

    All water under the bridge, etc. etc. But how much better would the Rams be right now if they had use of that 3rd rounder in 2021, and the first rounders in 2022 and this year?

    Plus Goff.

    Another way to go (pre-trade) might have been: Keep Goff, get him more weapons, protect him better, coach him up, and rebuild his confidence. Far less costly and better long term, IMO.

     

Viewing 30 posts - 211 through 240 (of 4,298 total)