Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 4,861 through 4,890 (of 7,618 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tweets 3/10 – currant Salary Cap = 25.4 M #40378
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    What current Rams have yet to sign? Cunningham and Harkey come to mind based on what I read yesterday.

    Plus, maybe they have to match an offer to one of their RFAs who was tendered at the lowest level.

    Cunningham was tendered at the lowest level, 1.6 M. NE might make him an offer that we can match if we want.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Hayes signs #40367
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Breaking down DE William Hayes’ new contract with Rams
    2:46 PM ET

    Nick WagonerESPN Staff Writer

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/27551/breaking-down-william-hayes-new-contract-with-rams
    The Los Angeles Rams took care of an important piece of in-house business Wednesday when they re-signed defensive end William Hayes to a three-year contract.

    According to ESPN Stats and Information, Hayes’ deal includes $10 million in guaranteed money to be paid out in the first two years. With no guarantees in Year 3, this deal essentially amounts to a two-year deal with the third year depending on Hayes’ production in the first two.

    Here’s a breakdown of the contract year-by-year.

    2016

    Base salary: $3 million (fully guaranteed)

    Roster bonus: $4 million (fully guaranteed, paid out on seventh day of league year)

    Cap charge: $7 million

    Cash: $7 million

    Notes: Up to $500,000 in not likely to be earned incentives based on playing time and playoff appearances

    2017

    Base salary: $3.5 million ($1 million fully guaranteed)

    Roster bonus: $2 million (fully guaranteed, paid out on third day of 2017 league year)

    Cap charge: $5.5 million

    Cash: $5.5 million

    Notes: Up to $500,000 in not likely to be earned incentives based on playing time and playoff appearances

    2018

    Base salary: $5 million

    Roster bonus: None

    Cap charge: $5 million

    Cash: $5 million

    Notes: Up to $500,000 in not likely to be earned incentives based on playing time and playoff appearances

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: The Kaepernick chronicles #40365
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000643173/article/will-it-take-a-secondround-pick-to-land-kaepernick
    Will it take a second-round pick to land Kaepernick?

    By Kevin Patra
    Around the NFL writer
    Published: March 10, 2016 at 10:54 a.m.
    Updated: March 10, 2016 at 11:20 a.m.

    The biggest question following the flurry of free agent moves on the first day of the new league year is what in the name of St. Peter will the Denver Broncos do at quarterback?

    With Brock Osweiler getting a huge payday in Houston and Peyton Manning retiring, the Broncos will become just the second team in NFL history to win a Super Bowl and go into the following season without their top two quarterbacks (2001 Ravens).

    NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport has previously reported the Broncos are interested in seeking a trade for San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick.

    But at what price?

    NFL Media columnist Mike Silver reported Thursday that the 49ers likely want a second-round pick for Kaepernick and the Broncos might be willing to part ways with a third rounder.

    “I believe that Colin Kaepernick is the target for the Denver Broncos,” Silver said on NFL Network’s NFL HQ. “I believe the 49ers are amendable to trading him. Whether it is a (third-round pick) a (second-round pick) if that’s what it takes. I think right now they’re doing a dance. But I expect the Denver Broncos to go out and get Colin Kaepernick as their top option.”

    Silver later added that another team is pursuing a deal for Kaepernick, and he believes the quarterback is “on the verge of being traded.”

    Elway has heaped praise on the Kaepernick in the past, including prior to last season when he said after joint practices with the 49ers, “I’ve always liked Colin,” per CSN Bay Area

    Silver reports Kaepernick is likely willing to restructure his contract to the Broncos’ liking to facilitate a trade — even if his deal is somewhat team-friendly already.

    The 49ers have insisted they want Kaepernick on their team and Chip Kelly has wanted to work with the athletic quarterback in the past. But could that all be posturing to get a higher pick back in exchange?

    Kaepernick’s agents have made it know he would like to be traded. Right now the best landing spot outside of the Bay Area is Denver.

    For now we wait for the dance to unfold to see if a trade comes to fruition.

    http://www.nfl.com/videos/denver-broncos/0ap3000000643160/Silver-Kaepernick-is-Broncos-top-quarterback-target
    Video link above.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant


    One for the other side. 😉

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: WRs & TEs in the draft thread, combine & after #40353
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Projecting Compensatory Draft Picks #40344
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I am looking for Fairley and Sims as possible additions to the list.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: The rest of the unsigned Rams #40343
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I figure they have 11 million left to spend on FAs. Reynolds and Bates have to be close to minimum, so they don’t really affect the cap anymore. Harkey and Sims would take ? 2-3 million each. With all the DTs in the draft, Fairley might not be more than 6 million. The Rams might just be able to cover that if they want. That is just this year though.

    I might add Fairley to Sims, as a don’t sign. We know they were interested in a CB and a TE and the draft has a lot of DTs.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: reporters assess/discuss Rams free agency … 3/9- ? #40340
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    null

    So, is Osweiler that much better? If he is going to us GBR to justify his opinion.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    They did OK, but, I thought they could have done more/better before it got to the 11th hour. I hope next year is better.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Barron signs #40271
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    6 million

    I was thinking more like what he actually got.

    After Quinn and Donald, i was thinking he was
    the next most valuable defender.

    They’ve lost four starters. Is the D in trouble?
    yes? No? Maybe?

    w
    v

    They need another DT. imo

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Barron signs #40260
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Wow, nice payday.

    What would you have predicted the contract
    would look like?

    w
    v

    6 million.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Barron signs #40254
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Wow, nice payday.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams placed low RFA tender on Benny Cunningham #40239
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    According to that, ROFR is different than original draft round. I thought they were just one thing. I will have to look that up, as soon as I finish my sandwich. 😉

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Projecting Compensatory Draft Picks #40216
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    This projects to a 3rd round pick for Jenkins.
    This projects to a 4th round pick for Mcleod.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rams & recent ex-Rams in free agency #40205
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I expected Demoff to do better before it got to this. He didn’t sign one of our potential FAs, unless you count Foles. He was probably busy doing other things.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Jenkins expected to sign with the Giants #40203
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I guess he really doesn’t mind playing outside in the COLD. 😉

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Jenkins expected to sign with the Giants #40199
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Caplan
    #Chargers RT Joe Barksdale contract numbers: 4 years, $22.2m, $10.5m fully guaranteed.

    Barksdale is better off with SD. The Rams are better of with Havenstein. imo

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Redskins inform Robert Griffin III of release #40106
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Let us keep trying to find the QB, but we don’t need to write off what we have now, Keenum, Mannion, and even Foles. It takes time for a QB to develope. But, I would like to trade Foles. 😉

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: "QBs in the draft" thread 3…Lynch, Cook, etc. #40089
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    He is almost the Greg Robinson of QBs. imo Is he worth taking at 15? I would probably take a position player.

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Tre Mason arrested #40083
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I don’t believe it happened as the police say. That story just doesn’t sit right. imo

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Three significant players per draft? #40082
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    In this draft, I expect the Rams to get 4 or 5 quality players, maybe not stars, but good players.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    I think the Rams probably won’t draft a QB in round one. Cause I figure Wentz and Goff to be gone and I think they might be the only 2 drafted in round one.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    As the process continues, it is looking more and more as if the Rams won’t draft a QB, at least not in the first round. imo

    I see it different. I think they will draft one high, and yes maybe even in the 1st round depending on who is there.

    That is what I originally thought. But, Cook and Lynch have gone down a bit in my opinion. Keenum and Mannion have gone up a bit. It also looks like replacing FAs will be a bit more up to the draft. All that makes QB less of a priority. imo

    At one time I was going to make the argument that drafting a QB in the first round was the smart thing to do. The more I tried to do that, the more I started to think maybe it is better to wait.

    But, anyway, either path is fine. It is hard to say one way is better than another at this point.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    As the process continues, it is looking more and more as if the Rams won’t draft a QB, at least not in the first round. imo

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rapoport: who is interested in dealing for Foles? #39989
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Rapoport On Foles Contract

    I just heard Rapoport talking about Foles on the NFL Network…..He said a team trading for Foles would only be picking up around a $2 million salary.

    That makes him very tradeable.

    We are in effect trading money for draft choices. What is~6 million worth in draft currency?

    Agamemnon

    in reply to: Rapoport: who is interested in dealing for Foles? #39970
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    This is encouraging. Maybe something will happen before the draft?

    Agamemnon

Viewing 30 posts - 4,861 through 4,890 (of 7,618 total)