a hole) is the lack of an electron at a position where one could exist in an atom

Let’s just fire everybody now and give all the players some time off. 😉

I am baking today, but I will be there. Doing the World’s Best CheeseCake and experimenting with custard pie.

I think wv ram made this once.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 2 months ago by Agamemnon.

A side note, Dirac combined Special Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, electromagnetic interactions or photons or light.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirac_equation

Dirac equation
In particle physics, the Dirac equation is a relativistic wave equation derived by British physicist Paul Dirac in 1928. In its free form, or including electromagnetic interactions, it describes all spin-1/2 massive particles such as electrons and quarks for which parity is a symmetry. It is consistent with both the principles of quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity,[1] and was the first theory to account fully for special relativity in the context of quantum mechanics. It was validated by accounting for the fine details of the hydrogen spectrum in a completely rigorous way.

What hasn’t been combined is General Relavity and Quantum Mechanics. General relativity is about space and time, and about gravity.

wv wrote:

Agamemnon wrote:

That title is a bit misleading…..
…. The photon, or light, is the probably the best way to illustrate the cosmic speed limit.

==============
OK, so there is a ‘cosmic speed limit’. But why is there a cosmic speed limit? And i wont even ask how we know there is a cosmic speed limit and how/why it works the way it does.

w
v

Short answer, nobody knows. Long answer, nobody knows.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/why-is-there-a-universal-speed-limit-c-and-why-is-it-what-it-is.478947/

zn wrote:

Agamemnon wrote:

Fisher reminds me of Maxwell Smart with all of his excuses

We differ on that.

I see 2012-15 as including an incredible run of sheer stupid bad luck.

I can’t think of an teams that played well on offense when they BOTH (a) lost the starting qb, and (b) dealt with issues on the OL including both *extensive* injuries and inexperience. I am always open to hear from someone who can think of examples that counter that statement. Until I hear examples, though, I just figure that this is a huge factor and there is no evidence of any kind AGAINST seeing it as a huge factor.

How many games from 2012-2015 did they have a relatively healthy and/or decently experienced OL?

20 of 64.

How many games from 2012-2015 did they a functioning, non-melted down or non-injured starting caliber qb?

I give Foles 4 games so it’s 27.

How many games did they have BOTH things?

15. Of 64.

And when he says he is the only guy to coach 2 bad teams that also moved? That’s just true. I don’t see any point in him humbly denying it to earn macho points.

And you know in the end no one needs to be swayed by these things (though denying them is just, well, denial). People can still just easily go, I don’t care, I don’t like Fisher anyway.

..

.

I gave him a pass on most of that stuff. But, some time this year, I just got tired of hearing the excuses. Maybe it was after the “We’re not going 7 And 9” speech? The 28 – 0 loss to SF? Losing to Miami on the final 2 TD drives? The blow out loses to NO and NE? “Missed it by that much Chief.”

Fisher reminds me of Maxwell Smart with all of his excuses, but the if he really wanted Jenkins, the front office let him down. They had the money to pay Jenkins. If they had concentrated on signing their own free agents, they had a chance to sign them all. They extended no contracts last year. We have done 2 this year, Brockers and Tavon. I think the move and Demoff letting someone else do contracts hurt their ability to sign their own free agents.

Maybe the personnel dept could have done better on checking the background of some players, but it seemed that if the coaches wanted a player they got them. Some examples are: Fisher got Gurley. Fassel got his kicker and punter. Williams got Alexander and Joiner. Boudreau got Robinson. Waufle got Donald. I believe most personnel depts let the coaches have more input on lower draft choices. They stack the board. That involves coaches and scouts. So, I don’t see how personnel let them down. Did personnel pick all the ex-Titan free agents? Did they sign Sensabaugh because Fisher didn’t want him? Fisher seems to think they could win with the players they had. imo

Voting proves theory? Anyway, I knew Cal’s question was a setup, but I answered anyway. I wanted to see what he thought proved something.

Cal wrote:

I’m curious. Can you explain a little?

How about starting here? Do you believe the earth is warming?

In the long term we are headed for a cooling. In the short term it is hard to say exactly when that will happen or if we will have some positive or negative variance before that happens. A few hundred years ago it was warmer, then we had the little ice age, then that ended. But this has nothing to do with hypothetical man made CO2 warming. imo

wv wrote:

Ag, so, you think all those scientists in all those different fields, in all those countries, are wrong about humans contributing to climate change?

w
v

Yes. I think they use bad arguments and every time I learn more, I am more convinced.

If you think otherwise, it won’t bother me. Everybody can come to their own conclusion.

I don’t know why he chooses to lump all that together. I only have problems with the climate change hoax.

Even calling it climate change is a misleading rebranding. It is the idea that man made CO2 causes any significant change, that I think is wrong.

• This reply was modified 9 years, 2 months ago by Agamemnon.