Worst movie I've seen in many a moon…

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Worst movie I've seen in many a moon…

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2515
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    “Lucy”.

    An ignorance of science, a lousy premise and horrendous acting coalesce into a perfect storm of bad cinema.

    My advice to Morgan Freeman? It’s ok to turn down a role once in awhile.

    #2571
    PA Ram
    Participant

    As soon as I heard the “we only use 10 percent of our brain” nonsense I sort of tuned that movie out. I guess it’s a great plot device for a film but I’m not big on bad science.

    Don’t get me wrong–I don’t mind stretching things. I’m sure Chris Nolan’s “Interstellar” will stretch things but at least things like “wormholes” are theoretically possible or even things like shared dreams in “Inception” may one day become a reality.

    But to start off with the old wives tale of the 10 percent of the brain thing and go from there? Eh.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #2609
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    It was bad, PA. Really bad. And I often go out of my way to give movies the benefit of the doubt but I think I might have suffered some form of PTSD after seeing this. I don’t know when or even if I’ll be able to take a chance on another film.

    Heck, I screamed like a little girl in a snake pit when I accidentally bumped into a bin full of 5 dollar DVD’s at Rite Aide today.

    #2638
    zn
    Moderator

    Yeah I saw the “%10 of the brain” thing in the trailer and just went…enh. Didn’t see it.

    If what you say is true, and I don’t doubt it, that’s a lotta wasted talent. Besson, Johansson…

    .

    #2689
    wv
    Participant

    Well, it looks like another ‘human-turns-grows-a-superbrain’
    script. I think the very first time i saw that story,
    it was on the old “Outer Limits” series back in the 60s.
    Cept in that show, the guy wore sunglasses to hide
    his eyes cause they looked like fried eggs.

    Anyway, i can watch Scarlett even if the movie’s bad:

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by wv.
    #2770
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Yeah I saw the “%10 of the brain” thing in the trailer and just went…enh. Didn’t see it.

    If what you say is true, and I don’t doubt it, that’s a lotta wasted talent. Besson, Johansson…

    .

    Johansson wasn’t good but it wasn’t really her fault. Her part was the same ol’ hackneyed role you often see in sci-fi movies such as this. As she gained access to more and more of her brain she became more automaton-like. Her character loses her depth and humanity. Much of her role involved staring blankly and speaking in a flat, emotionless tone. I find it boring that sci-fi movies always depict beings with higher intelligence as being Vulcan-like. It’s like they assume a sense of joy or wonder or sadness could not coexist in a super-smart being.

    Spoiler alert….

    In the end she merges with a computer and so she exists in the world wide web. Her body is gone and another character asks where she went. He immediately receives a text that says…”I am everywhere.”

    So, that makes her what, about the 50th character in a sci-fi film to merge with the global network of computers? It must be getting crowded in there.

    #2771
    zn
    Moderator

    So, that makes her what, about the 50th character in a sci-fi film to merge with the global network of computers? It must be getting crowded in there.

    Yeah Zola was the best of the lot.

    .

    #2778
    PA Ram
    Participant

    Johansson wasn’t good but it wasn’t really her fault. Her part was the same ol’ hackneyed role you often see in sci-fi movies such as this. As she gained access to more and more of her brain she became more automaton-like. Her character loses her depth and humanity. Much of her role involved staring blankly and speaking in a flat, emotionless tone. I find it boring that sci-fi movies always depict beings with higher intelligence as being Vulcan-like. It’s like they assume a sense of joy or wonder or sadness could not coexist in a super-smart being.

    This is probably the price to pay for going into a transhuman existence. If you believe in the idea that for the species to survive in the long run it will have to somehow morph into a sort of computer–less a carbon based life form but something that can still hold the general “stuff” of humans there probably has to be a merging point. There may have to be a compromise on what that would be.

    Okay–yes–yes–I’m making excuses for a terrible movie. It’s early–I just had some Frosted Flakes and my mind drifted off to the transhuman movement. It’s absurd anyway. When computers take over they won’t have any need for us anyway. But since this already may be a simulation who knows?

    P.S. This was written only using 1.3 percent of my brain.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    #2803
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    Oh yeah, well the Q were transcendent beings and they retained humanoid emotions and failings…

    1

    Lucy became sorta like a Q. Like a humorless, expressionless Q traveling through time and space…

    • This reply was modified 9 years, 9 months ago by zn.
    #4175
    zn
    Moderator

    Howdy NR. I fixed the image, which I assume is what you intended.

    Here’s how to do images.

    First with the image in question, right click it and choose “image info.”

    That takes you to a page where you can then copy the image url.

    Like so:

    a

    What you copy is the blued out part.

    Anyway then you come to the post box here, and click “img.” You paste the url in that, and then before posting it will ask you a couple of stupid questions. Check the box, type in any name (I chose “a”) and then post.

    #4242
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    No that’s cool. I’m glad you did and thanks for the info.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.