the supreme court, a running tally

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › the supreme court, a running tally

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 28, 2022 at 2:25 am #139447
    waterfield
    Participant

    Ever since Marberry v Madison the court has recognized “stare decisis” the principal that issues previously decided by the US Supreme Court should not be overturned unless to do so would “further” a constitutional right.  By overturning Roe v Wade the present Court has abolished that principal and has inserted its own notion that if you don’t care for the precedent then overrule it-even if to do so is to eliminate a basic right that has been decided and affirmed over and over.  These are not scholars they are advocates.

    Lest this go unnoticed: elections count. Had Hillary won -and of course she did win the popular vote-Roe v Wade would still be the law.

    June 30, 2022 at 11:43 am #139484
    zn
    Moderator

    June 30, 2022 at 11:48 am #139485
    zn
    Moderator

    June 30, 2022 at 11:50 am #139486
    zn
    Moderator
    GoWestYoungRams, CW@Go_West_Yng_Ram
    can we get Eric Weddle on a interview ? That was a incredible story him coming back like that . I heard he had a few muscle pull in the 4 wks we was with team besides that final tear. I also saw him seeth st media question B4 Superbowl. 
    June 30, 2022 at 11:50 am #139487
    zn
    Moderator

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.