Interesting vote at Exxon

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › Interesting vote at Exxon

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 1, 2017 at 8:29 pm #69589
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    link:https://insideclimatenews.org/news/31052017/exxon-shareholder-climate-change-disclosure-resolution-approved

    June 1, 2017 at 9:09 pm #69593
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator
    wv wrote:

    link:https://insideclimatenews.org/news/31052017/exxon-shareholder-climate-change-disclosure-resolution-approved

    ExxonMobil shareholders voted Wednesday to require the world’s largest oil and gas company to report on the impacts of climate change to its business—defying management, and marking a milestone in a 28-year effort by activist investors.

    Sixty-two percent of shareholders voted for Exxon to begin producing an annual report that explains how the company will be affected by global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Paris climate agreement. The analysis should address the financial risks the company faces as nations slash fossil fuel use in an effort to prevent worldwide temperatures from rising more than 2 degrees Celsius.

    Last year, 38 percent of Exxon shareholders supported essentially the same measure, which at the time was a record.

    The vote at Exxon shows the rapid erosion of support for the company’s defiant stance on climate disclosure, and it caps a shareholder meeting season that saw unprecedented support for greater corporate disclosure on climate change. In recent weeks, shareholders voted in favor of climate risk analysis at two other major energy companies, Occidental Petroleum and PPL, Pennsylvania’s largest utility. Climate-related shareholder resolutions also garnered record support at other big U.S. utilities that rely on fossil fuels: Dominion Resources (47.8%), Duke Energy (46.4%) and DTE Energy (45%).

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.