Fisher may be coaching for his job

Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Fisher may be coaching for his job

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 23, 2015 at 1:35 pm #34596
    nittany ram
    Moderator

    I don’t believe this for a minute. I don’t think Fisher is on the hot seat and won’t be until the situation regarding the move is settled. This guy provides no evidence that Fisher is in trouble other than pointing to his record and the Foles fiasco. Sounds like he doesn’t know Fisher’s situation that well. Trying to manufacture a story where none exists.

    http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/st-louis-rams-jeff-fisher-could-be-coaching-for-job-112315

    • This topic was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by nittany ram.
    November 23, 2015 at 1:52 pm #34600
    Agamemnon
    Moderator

    And before anyone gives Fisher an out by saying he hasn’t had a decent quarterback, sources said he was the one who pushed the Nick Foles trade to completion back in the spring. When he got back from a competition-committee meeting and learned the trade has stalled, he leaned on his staff to get it done.

    Also from the same story, I found this of interest.

    Agamemnon

    November 23, 2015 at 2:18 pm #34601
    zn
    Moderator
    Agamemnon wrote:

    And before anyone gives Fisher an out by saying he hasn’t had a decent quarterback, sources said he was the one who pushed the Nick Foles trade to completion back in the spring. When he got back from a competition-committee meeting and learned the trade has stalled, he leaned on his staff to get it done.

    And once missing there is this.

    Foles was fine until he melted down.

    I agree with Nittany, that is bad analysis.

    And on top of it, it’s like this repeat of the 2007 nightmare, and I mean this one. The OL loses 10 players to injuries, and what do a lot of people do? Blame Bulger.

    This is a young and inexperienced OL that got injured on top of it.

    What happens? I see people complaining that they benched Foles for Keenum.

    A: “Why aren’t you serving lunch on time.”
    B: “The restaurant is on fire.”
    A: “Well hire a decent cook for a change, jeeesh.”

    November 23, 2015 at 2:28 pm #34602
    Agamemnon
    Moderator
    zn wrote:

    And once missing there is this.

    Foles was fine until he melted down.

    I agree with Nittany, that is bad analysis.

    And on top of it, it’s like this repeat of the 2007 nightmare, and I mean this one. The OL loses 10 players to injuries, and what do a lot of people do? Blame Bulger.

    This is a young and inexperienced OL that got injured on top of it.

    What happens? I see people complaining that they benched Foles for Keenum.

    A: “Why aren’t you serving lunch on time.”
    B: “The restaurant is on fire.”
    A: “Well hire a decent cook for a change, jeeesh.”

    I should have pointed out that I was just interested in that they said Fisher was the one that really pushed for the trade. I was for the trade.

    Agamemnon

    November 23, 2015 at 6:22 pm #34612
    zn
    Moderator
    Agamemnon wrote:

    I should have pointed out that I was just interested in that they said Fisher was the one that really pushed for the trade. I was for the trade.

    Yeah I know.

    I’m not venting at anyone here.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.