Watch Cousins run the Washington Offence.

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Watch Cousins run the Washington Offence.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #68823
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    • This topic was modified 8 years, 10 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    #68824
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #68826
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Watch how they use Reed.

    Agamemnon

    #69297
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #69304
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Redskins: ‘Change’ of position for Pierre Garcon

    http://was.247sports.com/Bolt/Redskins-Change-of-position-for-Pierre-Garcon-38023166

    In an attempt to get the ball to Pierre Garcon more in 2015, the Washington Redskins have changed his position. No, he’s still a wide receiver, but his role/alignment within the offense has changed.

    It was just two seasons ago that Garcon led the NFL in receptions with 113. His production in 2014 dropped to just 68 receptions.

    According to offensive coordinator Sean McVay, who appeared on 106.7 The Fan’s Grant and Danny,

    “Well, one of the things we did this offseason, when you really go back and evaluate it, is we were able to switch DeSean to the X position and Pierre to our Z,” said McVay. “When you talk about the skill set you’re looking for from a Z, a physical receiver that’s a good a blocker in the run game, he can slant routes, some of those intermediate and short routes, and he also has to be physical to run some of those intermediate deep in-breaks.

    “That’s where Pierre’s greatest strengths are.”

    In general terms, the X receiver, which is now DeSean Jackson, is the one furthest away from the tight end, lining up wide and on the line of scrimmage. The Z is off the line of scrimmage, allowing the tight end to be eligible. The Z is generally the receiver that goes in motion.

    By sending Garcon in motion and playing him off the line of scrimmage, the feeling is that Garcon can exploit defenses but also play to his strength as a blocker in the run game.

    A move that McVay says has shown promise in OTAs and should allow the staff to target Garcon with more frequency in the pass game.

    “When you look at what he was able to do transitioning from the X to the Z position, I thought he did an excellent job. He was one of the bright spots of OTAs without a doubt, consistently working day in and day out, setting a great example for the rest of those guys in that room.

    “And I think we’ll do a much better job of being able to get him involved because of the type of player he is, with him being at that Z spot. And when you look back at the year he ended up having [in 2013], we did a good job, and Coach and Kyle Shanahan did a nice job of moving him around to put him in positions to be that primary target and now, with some of the players that we have, the DeSeans, the Jordan Reeds, you can just operate your offense and he will get more touches just being at that spot.”

    #69355
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Depends on how you mean that. If I recall PFF does deep attempts as 20 yards or more.

    Last I looked at ESPN splits, they no longer listed attempts, which means you can’t do attempts per range of throw (1-10 yards, 11-20 yards), etc. Fortunately back when they still had those numbers, I did them then, so I can re-post that here.

    So, if they follow the Washington model, will the McVay Rams throw deep a lot?

    According to the numbers it depends on what you mean deep. Where Washington did throw more (in 2016 anyway) was the medium and deep medium ranges (11-20 + 21-30 yards). (I count 31+ yards as deep).

    Percentage of total attempts thrown 31+ yards: %4.37.

    That’s not a high percentage. It’s not low. It’s just not high. High gets you into 5% or more (and rarely as high as 6%).

    Completion percentage on those? (31+ yards). 44%. That’s pretty good.

    How about medium/deep medium? That is passes thrown 11-30 yards.

    Percentage of total attempts thrown 11-30 yards: %25.9%.

    That’s pretty high. Above the norm by a percent or 2.

    Completion percentage on those? (11-30 yards). 52.7%. That’s also pretty good.

    Now how about throwing short?

    Percentage of total attempts thrown 10 yards or less: 69.7%.

    Actually that’s fairly high by a percent or 2.

    So they had a slightly higher than the norm percentage of attempts thrown short, and a not that high but decent percentage of attempts thrown deep (31+ yards). Why do they have a fairly high YPA then? (They were 3rd in YPA with 8.1). It looks to me like it’s the number of completions thrown in the 11-30 yard range. They both throw more of those (a bit above the norm) and complete them at a decent rate. I think it’s that, combined with aggressive yards after the catch numbers.

    Another stat comes from a different source. How did the 2016 Washington team rank in terms of passing plays of 25 yards or more (problem with this “big play” stat is that it doesn’t distinguish between attempt in the air and yards after the catch).

    According to that metric, Cousins ranked 1st in Big Play Passes with 44 (Ryan was 2nd with 42, Brees 3rd with 40).

    ..

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.