Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Fisher audio: “The move took a toll”
- This topic has 16 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by Agamemnon.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 22, 2016 at 2:53 am #61477znModerator
December 22, 2016 at 3:25 am #61478znModeratorIMO Fisher is fair and balanced. Keyshawn asks a really stupid question.
December 22, 2016 at 6:27 am #61487AgamemnonParticipantFisher reminds me of Maxwell Smart with all of his excuses, but the if he really wanted Jenkins, the front office let him down. They had the money to pay Jenkins. If they had concentrated on signing their own free agents, they had a chance to sign them all. They extended no contracts last year. We have done 2 this year, Brockers and Tavon. I think the move and Demoff letting someone else do contracts hurt their ability to sign their own free agents.
Maybe the personnel dept could have done better on checking the background of some players, but it seemed that if the coaches wanted a player they got them. Some examples are: Fisher got Gurley. Fassel got his kicker and punter. Williams got Alexander and Joiner. Boudreau got Robinson. Waufle got Donald. I believe most personnel depts let the coaches have more input on lower draft choices. They stack the board. That involves coaches and scouts. So, I don’t see how personnel let them down. Did personnel pick all the ex-Titan free agents? Did they sign Sensabaugh because Fisher didn’t want him? Fisher seems to think they could win with the players they had. imo
December 22, 2016 at 8:55 am #61497InvaderRamModeratori find it interesting that fisher says he took the job knowing that there was a pending move to los angeles. even though the move was being denied at the time. not the biggest deal to me. i wouldn’t figure they’d tell the truth back then anyway.
i do agree with him about the qb situation. if bradford had stayed healthy, things might have been very different.
losing mcleod and jenkins was a huge blow. i would have let tavon go and at least signed one of those two. although i have to admit i was ok with the signing at the time. i figured this group would be more able to find and develop a db than a wr. looking back it was a bad signing. maybe a new coach will get more out of him. i doubt it though.
- This reply was modified 8 years ago by InvaderRam.
December 22, 2016 at 9:42 am #61502wvParticipantTough for a guy who has just been fired to do interviews like that.
I give him credit for just doing the interview.w
vDecember 22, 2016 at 10:42 am #61507znModeratorFisher reminds me of Maxwell Smart with all of his excuses
We differ on that.
I see 2012-15 as including an incredible run of sheer stupid bad luck.
I can’t think of an teams that played well on offense when they BOTH (a) lost the starting qb, and (b) dealt with issues on the OL including both *extensive* injuries and inexperience. I am always open to hear from someone who can think of examples that counter that statement. Until I hear examples, though, I just figure that this is a huge factor and there is no evidence of any kind AGAINST seeing it as a huge factor.
How many games from 2012-2015 did they have a relatively healthy and/or decently experienced OL?
20 of 64.
How many games from 2012-2015 did they a functioning, non-melted down or non-injured starting caliber qb?
I give Foles 4 games so it’s 27.
How many games did they have BOTH things?
15. Of 64.
And when he says he is the only guy to coach 2 bad teams that also moved? That’s just true. I don’t see any point in him humbly denying it to earn macho points.
And you know in the end no one needs to be swayed by these things (though denying them is just, well, denial). People can still just easily go, I don’t care, I don’t like Fisher anyway.
..
.
December 22, 2016 at 12:12 pm #61521AgamemnonParticipantFisher reminds me of Maxwell Smart with all of his excuses
We differ on that.
I see 2012-15 as including an incredible run of sheer stupid bad luck.
I can’t think of an teams that played well on offense when they BOTH (a) lost the starting qb, and (b) dealt with issues on the OL including both *extensive* injuries and inexperience. I am always open to hear from someone who can think of examples that counter that statement. Until I hear examples, though, I just figure that this is a huge factor and there is no evidence of any kind AGAINST seeing it as a huge factor.
How many games from 2012-2015 did they have a relatively healthy and/or decently experienced OL?
20 of 64.
How many games from 2012-2015 did they a functioning, non-melted down or non-injured starting caliber qb?
I give Foles 4 games so it’s 27.
How many games did they have BOTH things?
15. Of 64.
And when he says he is the only guy to coach 2 bad teams that also moved? That’s just true. I don’t see any point in him humbly denying it to earn macho points.
And you know in the end no one needs to be swayed by these things (though denying them is just, well, denial). People can still just easily go, I don’t care, I don’t like Fisher anyway.
..
.
I gave him a pass on most of that stuff. But, some time this year, I just got tired of hearing the excuses. Maybe it was after the “We’re not going 7 And 9” speech? The 28 – 0 loss to SF? Losing to Miami on the final 2 TD drives? The blow out loses to NO and NE? “Missed it by that much Chief.”
December 22, 2016 at 12:58 pm #61522znModeratorI just got tired of hearing the excuses. Maybe it was after the “We’re not going 7 And 9” speech? The 28 – 0 loss to SF?
They were not ready for the season, that was clear. But then to me that came from a 1st time coordinator installing basically a new offense during a move. So the start of 2016 reminded me of the start of 2011, when they were out of sync from a bad install too.
But see in the end, JF thought a 1st time coordinator could install a new offense during a move. So. You know, he mixed his own poison on that one.
2016 was bad, but for me it doesn’t change 2012-15.
Plus of course no coach I have ever seen or heard of goes “yeah you’re right I suck.”
You’re not genetically programmed to be a coach if you are capable of a remark like that. Coaches always think, if I could just do one more thing, I will have it all fixed.
…
December 22, 2016 at 1:04 pm #61523AgamemnonParticipant2016 was bad, but for me it doesn’t change 2012-15.
Even up until when Fisher got fired, I have been pretty much, “I don’t care if he stays or goes.” I find that I am a bit relieved that he did get fired, because we get a new set of eyes on the team.
December 22, 2016 at 1:45 pm #61527znModeratori find it interesting that fisher says he took the job knowing that there was a pending move to los angeles
Yeah if there was any lingering doubt about that, JF gave it a swift mercy killing there.
December 22, 2016 at 3:25 pm #61537wvParticipantI find that I am a bit relieved that he did get fired, because we get a new set of eyes on the team.
————
Yeah, i also want a ‘new set of eyes’ on this team. There’s just something ‘wrong’ with this team. I dunno what it is exactly but somethin aint right with it. And I want a new coaching-brain looking at the situation.
w
vDecember 22, 2016 at 7:08 pm #61548InvaderRamModeratorEven up until when Fisher got fired, I have been pretty much, “I don’t care if he stays or goes.” I find that I am a bit relieved that he did get fired, because we get a new set of eyes on the team.
i think both things can be true.
i think it can be true that fisher endured some incredibly bad luck the first three years.
i think it can also be true that it was time for change. i think after all that losing sometimes players and staff begin to lose confidence. they start to get bogged down and sometimes there does need to be a change. a new set of eyes as you say to just shake things up. i just got the feeling that things weren’t going to get better.
fisher really screwed up hiring a first time coordinator. with a move. with a young qb. a young oline. young receivers. in retrospect it was a gross error in judgement to hire a first time coordinator on top of that. as an experienced head coach he should have anticipated this. so i don’t feel sorry for him.
although. if he had hired a young coordinator in shanahan would that maybe have changed things? who knows. who knows if shanahan even wanted the job.
December 22, 2016 at 7:17 pm #61550sanbaggerParticipant2016 was bad, but for me it doesn’t change 2012-15.
Even up until when Fisher got fired, I have been pretty much, “I don’t care if he stays or goes.” I find that I am a bit relieved that he did get fired, because we get a new set of eyes on the team.
Yea…me too
December 23, 2016 at 5:05 am #61579Eternal RamnationParticipantI think the melt down and the many problems leading to it had more to do with doing Hard Knocks than anything else . I think the move is overblown. Firstly it’s not like Fisher had to do the logistics and second moving in 2016 is so much easier than it was in the 90’s or 80’s. I moved my wife 12000 miles to a new freaking country while working 12hrs. a day and 8 on Saturday, while raising a teenager. I know it’s stressful and don’t deny it had an effect but the problems I saw this year have been the same year after year and I don’t see it happening because of the move. To me that’s an argument of convenience. What I saw, a fundamental breakdown of coaching not distractions from a move. I believe doing Hard Knocks exposed Fishers
coaching weaknesses to every team the Rams played this year and that is a very large advantage.December 23, 2016 at 2:07 pm #61600joemadParticipantI thought it was a good interview and he admits that he got canned for not winning enough games.
Bills, Dolphins, Panthers, Giants all games they could’ve and should’ve won.
We’ve too many winnable games lost throughout the past 2 years.
He had his chance and blew it, he did it his way.
December 23, 2016 at 2:15 pm #61601znModeratorFirstly it’s not like Fisher had to do the logistics
Well on that, he directly says he was heavily involved AND if he had it to do over would have delegated more of that stuff.
In fact that kind of thing continued far into the season…he mentions that when on the New England road trip, he spent 2 hours that Saturday with the Patz stadium architects.
His words were, he was always looking out for the players, which I took to mean his involvement with the planning was to continually ensure at every stage that the players’s interests were account for. Meeting with the architects, for example, could (in those terms) entail going over ways to make a new facility more player-oriented and/or friendly.
He basically said he was doing all that at the expense of coaching…which, since he says if he could do it over he would delegate more, I took as an admission of a certain kind of failure on his part.
…
December 23, 2016 at 3:41 pm #61607AgamemnonParticipantFor me the main or only excuse/reason I give real value to, is, if Fisher wanted to keep Jenkins and it didn’t happen. I am sure they had the money for Jenkins. They still have $5.5 million salary cap left. They wasted $5.5 million on Sensabaugh, $4.5 this year and $1 million next year. Jenkins had a cap number of $8 million this year. McLeod had a cap number of $2.6 million McLeod, well someone had to go when they didn’t extend any contracts early. Who is responsible for that? I assume it was the negotiator. But who told him what the value of a certain player was or did he do that himself?
If Fisher really wanted Jenkins, somebody screwed him. imo
It occurs to me that if they did say they were going to sign Jenkins and they saw that they couldn’t. Wouldn’t they have contacted Fisher to get his input on who he would rather have or not have? And how much do I want to trust that Fisher always tells the whole truth?
- This reply was modified 8 years ago by Agamemnon.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.