Globalization or Automation

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Globalization or Automation

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #50568
    waterfield
    Participant

    Interesting article on how trade pacts are not the real enemy when it comes to lost jobs.

    http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-manufacturing-jobs-lost-20160811-snap-story.html

    #50572
    wv
    Participant

    Well the article didnt address ‘trade pacts’ at all.

    It did argue that robots were the future and meaningful, living-wage, human-jobs
    are dwindling.

    “Today, he says, a new and expensive Dutch-made system can take 20-foot sections of aluminum and churn out a finished rim in about 90 seconds. For that, the company would need only one operator, just to make sure that the machines don’t jam.
    “It’s so automated, it’s inspiring,” he said of bike manufacturing today…..”

    w
    v

    #50631
    waterfield
    Participant

    “Using tougher trade policies with China and others to restore the nation’s manufacturing sector will bring home jobs, the theory goes.”

    The article disputes the notion that whatever trade agreements we have with China is responsible for the loss of manufacturing jobs here.

    The real and more serious question is what to do about automation as we go forward into the future. IMO we will have to accept a larger and larger number of people not working. And that shouldn’t be a negative in the sense that we now look at being “unemployed”. It is simply a product of a future which begs us to feel good about it and learn to live with the free time most will have. If this means government compensation or something else that allows us to be financially capable-who knows. But I suspect that is in the future for all of us.

    #50632
    InvaderRam
    Moderator

    sweet. does that mean i’ll have more time to watch an nfl played by robots?

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by InvaderRam.
    • This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by InvaderRam.
    #50684
    waterfield
    Participant

    Probably. One answer is to reduce the work day to four hrs without changing the pay or benefits. Nothing magical about eight. Logically you would double the workforce. In theory with more people working there is more money circulating and the corporations should be profiting as usual. That’s one man’s (me) solution.

    #50686
    wv
    Participant

    Probably. One answer is to reduce the work day to four hrs without changing the pay or benefits. Nothing magical about eight. Logically you would double the workforce. In theory with more people working there is more money circulating and the corporations should be profiting as usual. That’s one man’s (me) solution.

    —————-
    My solution would be to democratize the work-force. Top to bottom.
    In other words eviscerate the hierarchical corporate structure.

    Another man’s solution 🙂

    …are you planning on going to see the Rams at the Coliseum, W? When’s the last time you were there?

    w
    v

    #50706
    waterfield
    Participant

    Probably. One answer is to reduce the work day to four hrs without changing the pay or benefits. Nothing magical about eight. Logically you would double the workforce. In theory with more people working there is more money circulating and the corporations should be profiting as usual. That’s one man’s (me) solution.

    —————-
    My solution would be to democratize the work-force. Top to bottom.
    In other words eviscerate the hierarchical corporate structure.

    Another man’s solution 🙂

    …are you planning on going to see the Rams at the Coliseum, W? When’s the last time you were there?

    w
    v

    I’ve been invited to the KC preseason game which I think is next week. I can’t remember the last game I saw in the Coliseum. it all seems to blend together. Must have been in 79 since that was their last year there. I know I was living in Claremont at the time because we had a SB party following that season. I was at the last Anaheim game with my son and about 11 other people there. Crickets !

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    #50708
    wv
    Participant

    I’ve been invited to the KC preseason game which I think is next week. ..

    I was at the last Anaheim game with my son and about 11 other people there. Crickets !

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    —————-
    It dont matter what it means, since it aint gonna happen….There’s more than one way to organize work. Corporate-capitalism is just one way. There’s others. blah blah

    Last game at Anaheim, must have been the Washington game, in 94. December 24. Rams went 4-12.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Los_Angeles_Rams_season

    25,705 in attendance.

    Rams lost 24 to 21. Ellard had 81 yards.

    What did you think of the move to St.Louis back then? What were your thoughts.

    w
    v

    #50710
    snowman
    Participant

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    Not sure I know what a democratized workforce is either, but I have never worked in an environment where the boss makes rules that everyone is required to follow or get fired. A smart boss will ask for input from his/her employees because they are the ones doing the work, they know how it can be done better. Far too many bosses have never done the job of the people they supervise, yet they demand respect.

    #50713
    wv
    Participant

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    Not sure I know what a democratized workforce is either, but I have never worked in an environment where the boss makes rules that everyone is required to follow or get fired. A smart boss will ask for input from his/her employees because they are the ones doing the work, they know how it can be done better. Far too many bosses have never done the job of the people they supervise, yet they demand respect.

    =========

    In a nutshell, and avoiding pedantic columns of words, it just means…co-ops. Less hierarchy, more worker-control. There’s a gazillion experiments going on all over the globe testing such social-ideas.

    http://www.alternet.org/richard-d-wolff-can-we-remake-our-workplaces-be-more-democratic

    There’s no ‘one true definition’ of co-ops. Its like ‘anarchism’. No one final definition. Etc. And so forth.

    Americans of course have been taught that corporate-hierarchical-workplaces are ‘natural’ and ‘normal’ and the one true holy way. Americans have ‘internalized’ that idea.

    Well…there’s other ways. Each approach has pluses and minuses. Some ways might be more ‘efficient’ (the amerikan holy grail) and some ways might be
    more….humane.

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by wv.
    • This reply was modified 8 years, 1 month ago by wv.
    #50724
    waterfield
    Participant

    I’ve been invited to the KC preseason game which I think is next week. ..

    I was at the last Anaheim game with my son and about 11 other people there. Crickets !

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    —————-
    It dont matter what it means, since it aint gonna happen….There’s more than one way to organize work. Corporate-capitalism is just one way. There’s others. blah blah

    Last game at Anaheim, must have been the Washington game, in 94. December 24. Rams went 4-12.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Los_Angeles_Rams_season

    25,705 in attendance.

    Rams lost 24 to 21. Ellard had 81 yards.

    What did you think of the move to St.Louis back then? What were your thoughts.

    w
    v

    It was the Redskin game. Of the 25,000 plus there 24,000 were Redskin fans. That was the first game I saw Issac Bruce in person. He was not a starter that season. I recall vividly the last play of the Los Angeles Rams-I think. Chris Miller scrambling around and finally running out of bounds.

    The move to St. Louis. Well initially I was devastated since I had worked on the Save the Rams Committee along with Steinberg, etc. But the attendance had really sucked and people were so down on the organization I eventually thought the move to any place would be good. And when I attended the first game I knew they had found a “home”. The streets were filled with all kinds of Ram signs and every restaurant we went into had lots of Ram stuff on the walls, etc. We went back a few times to the Edward Jones site and truly enjoyed St. Louis. A great city with lots of tremendous restaurants and on one trip the biggest blues festival I ever went to. So it was really fun to go to a game where by far most people there were rooting for the Rams Not so in Anaheim. Hopefully things will be different this time here.

    #50741
    wv
    Participant

    I’ve been invited to the KC preseason game which I think is next week. ..

    I was at the last Anaheim game with my son and about 11 other people there. Crickets !

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    —————-
    It dont matter what it means, since it aint gonna happen….There’s more than one way to organize work. Corporate-capitalism is just one way. There’s others. blah blah

    Last game at Anaheim, must have been the Washington game, in 94. December 24. Rams went 4-12.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Los_Angeles_Rams_season

    25,705 in attendance.

    Rams lost 24 to 21. Ellard had 81 yards.

    What did you think of the move to St.Louis back then? What were your thoughts.

    w
    v

    It was the Redskin game. Of the 25,000 plus there 24,000 were Redskin fans. That was the first game I saw Issac Bruce in person. He was not a starter that season. I recall vividly the last play of the Los Angeles Rams-I think. Chris Miller scrambling around and finally running out of bounds.

    The move to St. Louis. Well initially I was devastated since I had worked on the Save the Rams Committee along with Steinberg, etc. But the attendance had really sucked and people were so down on the organization I eventually thought the move to any place would be good. And when I attended the first game I knew they had found a “home”. The streets were filled with all kinds of Ram signs and every restaurant we went into had lots of Ram stuff on the walls, etc. We went back a few times to the Edward Jones site and truly enjoyed St. Louis. A great city with lots of tremendous restaurants and on one trip the biggest blues festival I ever went to. So it was really fun to go to a game where by far most people there were rooting for the Rams Not so in Anaheim. Hopefully things will be different this time here.

    ——————

    Well do you think Georgia intentionally sabotaged the team/roster
    to pave the way for the move? Do you think thats an owners prerogative?

    …they should show that last play of the Washington game
    during pregame of the first game.

    w
    v

    #50765
    waterfield
    Participant

    I’ve been invited to the KC preseason game which I think is next week. ..

    I was at the last Anaheim game with my son and about 11 other people there. Crickets !

    What the heck is a “democratized work-force”? You mean a boss couldn’t tell a worker: “you know Mr. Smith this is not a democracy here. You do have a choice in the matter. You can follow our rules or you can go to work some place else.”

    —————-
    It dont matter what it means, since it aint gonna happen….There’s more than one way to organize work. Corporate-capitalism is just one way. There’s others. blah blah

    Last game at Anaheim, must have been the Washington game, in 94. December 24. Rams went 4-12.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Los_Angeles_Rams_season

    25,705 in attendance.

    Rams lost 24 to 21. Ellard had 81 yards.

    What did you think of the move to St.Louis back then? What were your thoughts.

    w
    v

    It was the Redskin game. Of the 25,000 plus there 24,000 were Redskin fans. That was the first game I saw Issac Bruce in person. He was not a starter that season. I recall vividly the last play of the Los Angeles Rams-I think. Chris Miller scrambling around and finally running out of bounds.

    The move to St. Louis. Well initially I was devastated since I had worked on the Save the Rams Committee along with Steinberg, etc. But the attendance had really sucked and people were so down on the organization I eventually thought the move to any place would be good. And when I attended the first game I knew they had found a “home”. The streets were filled with all kinds of Ram signs and every restaurant we went into had lots of Ram stuff on the walls, etc. We went back a few times to the Edward Jones site and truly enjoyed St. Louis. A great city with lots of tremendous restaurants and on one trip the biggest blues festival I ever went to. So it was really fun to go to a game where by far most people there were rooting for the Rams Not so in Anaheim. Hopefully things will be different this time here.

    ——————

    Well do you think Georgia intentionally sabotaged the team/roster
    to pave the way for the move? Do you think thats an owners prerogative?

    …they should show that last play of the Washington game
    during pregame of the first game.

    w
    v

    “Well do you think Georgia intentionally sabotaged the team/roster
    to pave the way for the move? Do you think thats an owners prerogative?”

    That was my thinking but more focused on Shaw suggesting same. There actually was a lawsuit filed under a fraud theory from a group of season ticket holders who alleged the team had represented it would be very competitive in the draft and acquisition of players, etc. It was thrown out of court. So who knows. I do think there is a certain trust in the community that an owner would violate by intentionally running a team down. Illegal-only in the sense that the NFL could take punitive measures against any of its members.

    #50766
    zn
    Moderator

    I never believed for a second the “intentionally running the team down” argument.

    What ran the team down was good old-fashioned incompetence and bad decisions…cause, that’s what happens when your team is run by a lawyer and not a football pro.

    And that incompetence continued in St. Louis too until Vermeil came aboard. So the idea that it was intentional just has no legs to stand on.

    Besides, they didn’t need “to run the team down.” Anaheim attendance was always going to lag on its own. They could always find a way to engineer the move.

    To me the “they ran the team down” deliberately rountine is, and always has been, just a fan-driven conspiracy theory.

    #50776
    wv
    Participant

    I

    To me the “they ran the team down” deliberately rountine is, and always has been, just a fan-driven conspiracy theory.

    ————

    I tend to agree, but I dunno. There’s definitely not as much hard evidence for the Georgia-ran-the-team-down,
    as, say, the case of the faked-moon-landing.

    w
    v

    #50786
    zn
    Moderator

    I

    To me the “they ran the team down” deliberately rountine is, and always has been, just a fan-driven conspiracy theory.

    ————

    I tend to agree, but I dunno. There’s definitely not as much hard evidence for the Georgia-ran-the-team-down,
    as, say, the case of the faked-moon-landing.

    w
    v

    I don’t buy into conspiracy theories much. And spreading conspiracy theories is not wise. That’s why the NSA reads this board. To monitor conspiracy theories.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.