Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Wagoner: A revamped quarterback room
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 9 months ago by
wv.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 26, 2015 at 5:10 pm #25309
znModeratorSt. Louis Rams offseason roster review: A revamped quarterback room
By Nick Wagoner
EARTH CITY, Mo. — The St. Louis Rams don’t start organized team activities until June 3, but with most of the offseason heavy lifting complete, the current roster likely will make up the vast majority of players come the start of the regular season.
With that in mind, we’ll spend the next week or so delving into each position group with some thoughts on who will start, who might be on the bubble and how the depth chart could shake out.
Position: QB
Returning: Austin Davis
Newcomers: Nick Foles, Case Keenum, Sean Mannion
Departures: Sam Bradford, Shaun Hill
Projected starter: Foles
Battle to watch: Rams coach Jeff Fisher has already declared Foles his starter and there’s probably nothing short of an injury or off the field issue that can change that. After spending a third-round pick on Mannion, he also is pretty much a lock to make the roster. So the real battle here is to be the third quarterback on the roster and the likely backup for Foles. That means a battle of two players who spent time with the Rams in 2014: Davis and Keenum. Since Mannion will take some time to develop, the winner of that battle will probably be the No. 2 signal caller to start the season and the loser will be in the strange position of being out of a job entirely.
Outlook: The Rams are hoping that the drastic changes they’ve made to the quarterback room will finally be enough to get them over the hump and into playoff contention. They even made a change with the coaching staff here, hiring Chris Weinke as quarterbacks coach and bringing Jeff Garcia on as an offensive assistant. Foles isn’t as physically gifted as Bradford as a passer but the simple act of being healthy and cheap represents a potential upgrade. In the Rams’ offense, Foles doesn’t need to be the 27-touchdown, two-interception guy he was in 2013 but he also can’t be the guy who missed time with injuries and struggled with turnovers in 2014. Instead, the Rams need a quarterback who can not make the critical mistakes that Davis had a knack for last year and take advantage when downfield opportunities arise. To reacquire Keenum, the Rams dealt a seventh-round pick in next year’s draft to Houston and he should get a better look this time around. Davis signed a tender offer as a restricted free agent and has at least flashed the ability to spot start when needed. Mannion is a project but not as much of one as some of the spread-system quarterbacks now entering the league. In an ideal world, Foles emerges as a top choice both short and long term but barring that, the hope is that Mannion can develop into a potential long-term fit capable of giving the Rams options moving forward.
June 3, 2015 at 12:45 pm #25735
znModeratorFoles isn’t as physically gifted as Bradford as a passer but the simple act of being healthy and cheap represents a potential upgrade.
I agree with those who say Foles has big questions to answer, because of 2014.
I also agree with those who say, he ought to be fine—that is, chances are, he will answer those questions.
BUT I also think KW sells Foles, or his potential, short here. It’s more than healthy and cheap. (For one thing, if he plays well, he ain’t gonna be cheap for long.)
Foles brings some stuff that is unique to him as a guy who is a collection of different tangible and intangible skills. For example, I think he has some improviser in him, and truth is, we have not seen that for a few years—those were qualities PRESENT but still LESS PRESENT in Bulger and Bradford than in Foles, IMO.
.
June 3, 2015 at 12:58 pm #25738
AgamemnonParticipantJune 3, 2015 at 2:23 pm #25744
wvParticipantFoles brings some stuff that is unique to him as a guy who is a collection of different tangible and intangible skills. For example, I think he has some improviser in him, and truth is, we have not seen that for a few years—those were qualities PRESENT but still LESS PRESENT in Bulger and Bradford than in Foles, IMO.
I also think his ‘toughness’ impressed the Eagles players. I get
the impression the Eagles players liked playing with Foles.
He impressed them with some ‘intangible’ thingy.w
v -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.


