new Rams draft thread…April (except WR stuff which has its own thread)

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle new Rams draft thread…April (except WR stuff which has its own thread)

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #163088
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    This is a thread for everything except stuff exclusively dedicated to WR picks, since there’s a thread for that here: https://theramshuddle.com/topic/wr-draft-2026-gets-its-own-thread/#post-163087

    #163091
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/rams/2026/03/29/nfl-draft-rams-crucial-preview-2026/89351773007/?taid=69c97b7ff7ed800001b24036&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter

    with the opportunity to draft a blue-chip talent at No. 13 overall, the Rams are facing a crucial draft, according to The Athletic’s Derrik Klassen.

    “They’re trying to win a Super Bowl this year. This is it,” he said. “…Their other first-round pick is higher than they typically pick, at 13. They have a chance to get a serious playmaker at 13 in a way that they always don’t. And that, when you are trying to fight for a Super Bowl, to hold that crown, getting a guy at 13 who could be a true, true star for you, I really do think that’s the kind of thing that could kick them into overdrive and actually give them a shot again.”

    #163100
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #163121
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Les Snead and Sean McVay on outlook for 13th overall pick in 2026 NFL Draft following Trent McDuffie trade, roster changes via free agency

    Stu Jackson

    https://www.therams.com/news/les-snead-and-sean-mcvay-on-outlook-for-13th-overall-pick-in-2026-nfl-draft-following-trent-mcduffie-trade-roster-changes-via-free-agency

    PHOENIX – Read any of the recent mock drafts published or free agency report cards, and you will find the Rams – to borrow the phrase from Voice of the Rams J.B. Long on the latest episode of Between the Horns – at the top of the class, or without a glaring hole on their roster.

    The acquisitions of Trent McDuffie and Jaylen Watson addressed the secondary in a major way, and in the case of the trade package for McDuffie, leaves the Rams with the 13th pick in the first round after including the 29th pick in that deal with the Chiefs. Many of those analysts and experts projecting the Rams to go wide receiver, offensive tackle or tight end with the draft less than a month away.

    General manager Les Snead said earlier this month the team typically prefers to address roster needs in free agency to avoid being desperate in the draft. Asked about trading up from No. 13, staying put at that slot, trading back, or using it like the 29th pick and trading it for a veteran player, Snead indicated the most realistic scenarios are staying put or trading back, depending on how the draft goes.

    “I think, if I were being realistic, more than likely we don’t move up, because the price point to move up, depending on how the thing goes, you always go, can you as you go in your situation,” Snead said speaking to reporters Monday at the NFL Annual Meeting. “If it’s, oh, some of the players that come in right now, they’re gone, maybe you could move back. That would be the strategy, collect more picks if that’s a possibility. And then I would say also, I doubt we use that for a veteran player. We’ve kind of saved that pick because it is 13. We haven’t picked this low, high, whatever you want to call it, in the lot. So that’s where we’re at.”

    As Snead points out, No. 13 overall would eclipse No. 19 overall in 2024 as the highest the Rams have drafted since 2016, when they took Jared Goff with the first pick. The number 13 has also been lucky for L.A.: It was the same slot they took a defensive lineman named Aaron Donald back in 2014.

    To Snead’s point about trading up and how costly it could be, via an exercise using just this year’s draft picks: Using Hall-of-Fame head coach Jimmy Johnson’s trade value chart, a hypothetical move up to No. 8 (worth 1400 points, according to the chart) would cost the Rams the No. 13 pick (1150) and the No. 61 pick (292) to match that value. If Los Angeles were to package its free three picks – 13, 61 and 93 (value 128), the highest they could go would be No. 7 overall (1500), but that would leave an uncomfortable gap between picks, as they wouldn’t be scheduled to go on the clock at No. 207 overall in the sixth round. Even moving up to No. 8 would create a large gap of 85 picks.

    So, about staying put or trading back and why that makes the most sense.

    Most analyst project a short- and long-term impact player on the offensive side of the ball to be available at pick 13. Trading back presents an opportunity to build on the seven total picks they are scheduled to enter the draft with, though it’s worth noting they had eight total picks entering last year’s draft and, through trading up in that draft, wound up with a six-man class (which became five after waiving fifth-round pick Pooh Paul Jr. as part of 53-man roster cuts). That class size was partially influenced by the continuity of the roster as it was constructed, and aside from a few free agency departures in the secondary, the Rams retain the majority of their personnel from a 12-5 team that finished second in the NFC West and one win shy of advancing to the Super Bowl.

    Asked by ESPN’s Peter Schrager on *NFL* *Live* whether there is pressure to add an offensive playmaker at pick 13 that “knowing the clock is ticking” with quarterback Matthew Stafford (age 38) and wide receiver Davante Adams (turns 34 in December), McVay said “you can never have enough guys that move forward and rush the quarterback, and you can never have enough guys that make plays with the ball in their hands.”

    “And so those are things that we always look to,” McVay said. “What you do feel good about is the way that our roster is currently constructed, you feel like you can go with really a lot of different directions at 13 based on what unfolds in the first 12 picks. And so, if we stay pat, we’ll see what ends up happening. But we are excited about it and I’m excited about what it’ll look like. We’re going to add a quality player at 13, I do feel confident in that.”

    #163142
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #163146
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Cameron DaSilva@camdasilva
    Les Snead says the Rams intentionally gave up Day 3 picks in this year’s draft for Trent McDuffie because they believe the class is “a little thin later”

    #163201
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    AJ Schulte@AJSchulteFB
    It is pretty interesting that the Rams have met with a lot of nickel type DBs with Keionte Scott, Chris Johnson, and now Treydan Stukes all being reported.

    Worth noting that their most frequent meetings seem to be at WR, LB, and CB so far…

    #163221
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Danny Parkins and crew banter about the McSnead approach of trading away first round picks. Fwiw.

    #163223
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Danny Parkins and crew banter about the McSnead approach of trading away first round picks. Fwiw.

    But guys…they didn’t have 1st round picks because They. Traded. Them. For. Elite. Players.

    Try and factor that in.

    #163239
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams got 6 starters (in red) and 2 decent back-ups (in blue) from the 2023 draft.

    Quite a haul. ]

    And it has to be the best 5th round in their entire history as a franchise.

    2 Steve Avila
    3 Byron Young
    3 Kobie Turner

    4 Stetson Bennett
    5 Nick Hampton
    5 Warren McClendon
    5 Davis Allen
    5 Puka Nacua
    6 Tre’Vius Tomlinson
    6 Ochaun Mathis
    6 Zach Evans
    7 Ethan Evans
    7 Jason Taylor
    7 Desjuan Johnson

    #163248
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Selecting the Best NFL Draft Pick Ever for Every Team: https://www.si.com/nfl/selecting-best-nfl-draft-pick-ever-for-every-team

    Los Angeles Rams: Deacon Jones, DE
    Selection: 1961, 14th round (No. 186)

    Jones played in an era before sacks were official in 1982; otherwise, he’d likely be regarded as perhaps the finest defensive end to ever live. Jones was a 14th-round pick out of Mississippi Valley State and became part of the famed Fearsome Foursome in Los Angeles. Jones totaled an unofficial 173.5 sacks in his 14-year career, including at least 21 sacks on three occasions during the 14-game schedule era. A five-time first-team All-Pro, Jones was the benchmark of his era for pass rushing.

    #163276
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Nick Wright’s latest mock. Sadiq the fast Oregon TE.

    Calls it a ‘luxury pick’ though.

    #163277
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I am starting to think about DL/edge as a position to target this draft. But someone to play at the 3/4 DE spot, not an OLB/edge like Young.

    Enhance a team strength.

    And they could get either a receiver or DL/edge or both in round 2. More incentive to trade down.

    ***

    Ranking 11 position groups in 2026 NFL Draft from strongest to weakest: Edge rusher, linebacker loaded

    Lance Zierlein

    https://www.nfl.com/news/ranking-11-position-groups-in-2026-nfl-draft-from-strongest-to-weakest-edge-rusher-linebacker-loaded

    Quarterback and running back are two of the most high-profile positions in college football, but this year, we could see a record-low number of QBs and RBs selected inside the top 100 of the draft. Meanwhile, it is becoming a recurring theme, but edge defenders sit atop the prospect food chain once again. Notably, the linebacker position offers a far greater number of starters (and potential starters) than we usually see.

    In total, I rank the 2026 NFL Draft very slightly ahead of last year’s talent pool, but by a small margin.

    Before we dive into my ranking of the 11 major position groups in this year’s draft, it’s important to explain the criteria I used. In assessing each position, I identified star-caliber players, future starters and overall depth. Generally speaking, I concentrated on prospects who are most likely to be drafted in Rounds 1 through 5. I weighed star players and future starters twice as heavily as overall depth, and my ranking scale ranged from 10 to 30 points. A score of 20 points or higher for a position group is considered strong. Anything below 17 is poor for the position as a whole.

    (1) Edge defender (24.5 points)

    There were five edge defenders drafted in last April’s first round and 11 selected on Day 2. This year, we have another loaded group of QB hunters. Arvell Reese is a developmental prospect with huge upside, while David Bailey is rush-ready as a true pocket pillager. Rueben Bain Jr. brings unique power, while fellow Miami product Akheem Mesidor is the most skilled rusher in this class. Zion Young majors in block destruction as a run defender, and Malachi Lawrence is getting some buzz behind the scenes. This class figures to provide a strong number of future starters, with as many as 17 players poised to come off the board in the first three rounds, but the quality of depth will trail off on Day 3. The edge defenders will rule the first round.

    (2) Linebacker (22.5 points)

    Off-ball linebacker became a consistently sparse offering in the draft over the last several years, but this is one of the strongest groups we’ve seen in a while. Sonny Styles could be a top-10 draft pick, which would mark the first time that’s happened for the position since 2020, when the Arizona Cardinals took Isaiah Simmons eighth overall. Anthony Hill Jr. is a talented three-down option who could go on Day 1, while Jake Golday, CJ Allen and Jacob Rodriguez look like Round 2 selections as potential early starters. The linebacker group stays strong in Rounds 3 and 4, with decent depth stretching into the fifth round.

    (3) Interior offensive line (22 points)

    There hasn’t been a draft with four full rounds worth of quality interior offensive linemen in quite some time. This year’s prospect pool offers just that. There is a clear Big Three at guard with Vega Ioane, Chase Bisontis and Emmanuel Pregnon leading the way, but Keylan Rutledge will be a strong Day 2 option. Furthermore, this draft is filled with potential tackle-to-guard converts who bolster the position group even more. Meanwhile, Connor Lew, Sam Hecht, Logan Jones and Brian Parker II could all become future starting centers, while Trey Zuhn III might not be far behind. The number of starters and the depth into Round 5 is what helps this group stand out.

    (4) Wide receiver (19.5 points)

    The 2025 receiver class stepped up last season — with Offensive Rookie of the Year Tetairoa McMillan, Emeka Egbuka and Luther Burden III leading the way — and this year’s group compares favorably with last year’s crop. Carnell Tate, Makai Lemon and Jordyn Tyson all have early-starter talent and polish as probable first-round picks. KC Concepcion is a premium separator for teams seeking a slippery slot, while Omar Cooper Jr. is ascending due to his enticing combination of size, speed and strength. In terms of starting talent, this offering is a little softer than those from some recent years, but there will be plenty of quality depth for WR3/4 roles inside of the first five rounds.

    (5) Cornerback (18.5 points)

    In each of the past two drafts, we’ve seen three cornerbacks go in the first round. That could be the number this year, as well. While I believe Mansoor Delane has star-caliber talent on tape, some in the league see him slightly below that. Viewpoints also vary on the two Tennessee products, Jermod McCoy and Colton Hood. The depth at wide corner is lacking, but there are some very talented nickelbacks who will step into starting roles fairly quickly, including Avieon Terrell, Treydan Stukes, D’Angelo Ponds and Keionte Scott. It’s worth noting that this might be the fastest cornerback group, from top to bottom, that we’ve ever seen.

    (T-6) Safety (18 points)

    Last year’s safety class outplayed where I ranked it in this exercise, with Day 2 picks Nick Emmanwori, Xavier Watts and Jonas Sanker leading the way. This year, Caleb Downs, Dillon Thieneman and Emmanuel McNeil-Warren should all go in Round 1. Ballhawking safeties like Bud Clark and A.J. Haulcy offer future starting value in the second round, as does Jalen Kilgore, who is a big, explosive down safety. I’m also a fan of VJ Payne from Kansas State, but in general, this group becomes average, depth-level talent fairly quickly on Day 3.

    (T-6) Tight end (18 points)

    Kenyon Sadiq offers star potential but won’t carry the same caliber of grade as Tyler Warren and Colston Loveland did last year. Sadiq is a mismatch piece who could warrant an earlier pick than expected, though he’s the only first-round option. We might not see many second-round TE picks, but this group is fairly deep in Rounds 3 through 5, featuring some solid pass catchers and a very strong run blocker in Sam Roush out of Stanford. The 2026 draft could produce a sneaky-high number of tight ends who earn second NFL contracts.

    (T-8) Interior defensive line (17 points)

    With Caleb Banks apparently nursing a broken foot, we now have three defensive tackles who could be borderline first-rounders in the Florida product, Kayden McDonald and Peter Woods. Beyond that talented trio, the position offers a series of future starters/rotational contributors on Day 2. Zxavian Harris isn’t for everyone, but the 6-foot-8, 330-pounder has impressive flashes on tape. Your team might need to draft a DT inside the first 120 picks in order to ensure quality.

    (T-8) Offensive tackle (17 points)

    Unfortunately for tackle-needy teams, this year’s class features more questions than answers over the first two rounds. Top prospects like Francis Mauigoa and Spencer Fano come with shorter-than-desired arms, while the gargantuan Kadyn Proctor is coming off a highly uneven season in pass protection. Caleb Lomu, Monroe Freeling and Max Iheanachor all have talent but are less polished than teams might like. There is an adequate number of starting-caliber bookends available early, but it becomes highly speculative for teams hunting quality depth by the middle of the third round.

    (10) Running back (15 points)

    Last year, running back was one of the deepest positions in the draft. This year’s group is easily one of the weakest in the class. There is star quality at the top with Jeremiyah Love — and his Notre Dame teammate, Jadarian Price, looks like a very good future NFL starter. But this RB crop gets very light, very quickly. With his size (6-1, 223) and speed (4.33 40-yard dash), Mike Washington Jr. appears to be the clear third back in the draft. There has never been an NFL draft since 1960 that had fewer than four running backs selected inside the first three rounds, but this could be the year.

    (11) Quarterback (13.5 points)

    While Fernando Mendoza carries a higher grade and more star potential heading into the draft than Cam Ward did a year ago, the 2025 QB crop actually felt like it had better backup depth, which is a small separator from this year’s group. Ty Simpson has a chance to become an NFL starter, but this is a below-average quarterback class with a low number of future starters and quality backups to choose from. It wouldn’t shock me to see QB-hungry teams kick the can down the road and wait until next year.

    #163278
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/rams/2026/04/13/rams-nfl-draft-offensive-line-jim-everett/89595904007/?taid=69dd8384bd318b0001e8252e&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

    Heading into the 2026 NFL Draft, everything seems to be pointing toward the Los Angeles Rams taking a wide receiver with their first pick. That’s logical considering the lack of depth behind Puka Nacua and Davante Adams, but it’s certainly not a must-draft position in Round 1.

    Former Rams quarterback Jim Everett has another spot in mind for the Rams at No. 13 overall: offensive line.

    In an interview with Action Network, Everett pointed out that four of the Rams’ five offensive linemen are only under contract through the 2026 season. Coleman Shelton, Steve Avila, Kevin Dotson and Warren McClendon Jr. are all set to be free agents in 2027 if they don’t re-sign with the Rams beforehand, which is a slight problem for Los Angeles.

    For that reason, he could “easily see” the Rams using their top pick on an offensive lineman, specifically a tackle who can provide some insurance behind Alaric Jackson and McClendon.

    “Four of the five Rams’ offensive linemen are in the final year of their contract,” Everett said. “You can’t negotiate with every single one of them, and you have no leverage if you don’t have anybody that could possibly take their spot. A general manager is a general manager, not just this year, but hopefully for years. And so job security would mean I need to find somebody that I could put leverage on my right tackle, because I don’t want to pay my right tackle $25 million next year.

    “A rookie allows you to pay him a lot less for the first four, possibly five years, depending on options. So I think offensive lineman make fiscal sense. It makes sense as far as being in development. And then maybe if you get a guy like the Utah kid (Spencer) Fano, maybe he plays guard for a minute, right? He learns the system before he moves out. So I can easily see an offensive lineman there.”

    The Rams should feel good about their starting offensive line right now, but it’s hardly solidified for the future. Though the Rams are unlikely to let all four players leave in 2027 once their contracts expire, it’ll also be difficult to re-sign each one of them.

    #163283
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Nate Atkins, https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7193986/2026/04/14/rams-mailbag-nfl-draft-carnell-tate/?source=emp_shared_article&unlocked_article_code=1.a1A.W4xZ.brBb2L63tnBH&smid=ta-ios-share

    Q: Is trading up for wide receiver Carnell Tate a real possibility, or am I getting my hopes up?
    Q: Do you think the Rams have enough draft ammo to trade up for linebacker Sonny Styles? — Tim F.

    A: I’ll tackle both of these in one answer because deciding the level to which the Rams will or should trade up is also interesting.

    I don’t think the Rams will part with their 2027 first-round pick, just because of the opportunity to cash that in on a quarterback in next year’s loaded class. They would have to be so blown away by those players compared to alternatives and/or confident they can land a quarterback of the future after that pick — but that could take a second trade up.

    Based on the Jimmy Johnson trade value chart, the Rams can get as high as the No. 8 pick by offering this year’s second-rounder, based on value. They can maybe add a little more to get to No. 6 from the Cleveland Browns, who seem like a strong trade-back option. That feels like the range where Tate and Styles are most likely to go. And that’s where the positions matter a ton.

    To move up for Styles, the Rams would have to find another route to filling their No. 3 wide receiver role. Doing that with a third-round pick would likely mean the rookie receiver is either stashed or a higher-floor player with lower future upside. Los Angeles is trying to address both areas with this role, given that Puka Nacua and Davante Adams both missed three games last season, and Adams is in the final year of his contract at age 33.

    Some view Tate as the only durable receiver in this class with No. 1 upside, and if the Rams want to hedge against the possibility of not paying Nacua, that would be a reason to move. But if they view this pick primarily as a No. 3 receiver who will become the No. 2 after Adams departs, the need to get the top wideout in the draft isn’t as high when USC’s Makai Lemon and Arizona State’s Jordyn Tyson are also intriguing.

    A more realistic trade-up option for me is a small move up for their favorite between Lemon and Tyson once Tate is off the board.

    Q: I feel like the Rams are more likely to move down and either target Oregon tight end Kenyon Sadiq, Indiana wide receiver Omar Cooper Jr. or an offensive lineman. What prospects would they consider staying at 13 and taking, if someone were to fall like Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love or Ohio State safety Caleb Downs?

    A: It’s always hard to analyze whether a team should or will trade down because it depends on whether another team is coming up for someone. General managers hold draft picks tightly and only move them with intent. I don’t think we’ll see as many trades this year, with teams protecting picks for a 2027 draft expected to be much stronger than this year’s.

    But it is a good thought exercise to identify the line in the sand where a trade offer isn’t worth taking because of who is available.

    I’d put Tate, Lemon and Styles above that line. Those three are among the very best players at two of the only positions where the Rams could use a major talent upgrade. Of course, the answer can change if another team is willing to overpay — and especially if it is willing to part with a 2027 first-rounder. But I don’t think it’s worth trading down for fair 2026 value if any of those three are available.

    I don’t put Downs in that camp because the Rams have already paid Quentin Lake and Kam Curl, have high hopes for Kam Kinchens and Jaylen McCollough, and also now have Trent McDuffie to give some inside snaps to. They just don’t have the room to make use of a versatile safety like Downs. If he’s available, it makes a trade down all the more likely.

    Love is the interesting one. The Rams need his position about as little as they need any this year, but you could also argue that he is one of the three best players in the entire draft — to the degree where he could be a legitimate upgrade over Kyren Williams.

    It gets tricky because what the Rams value most from the running back position is pass protection, and it’s hard to get better than Williams in that regard. They also believe there’s another surge coming from Blake Corum, and one of Corum or Williams would have to depart in a trade if Love is the pick.

    But I think he’s of the talent level that they’d need to take him at No. 13 if trade offers aren’t coming and Tate, Lemon and Styles are all off the board.

    In reality, if Love or Downs are available at No. 13, the Rams should be in a great spot to move back. That could be a slight move back, knowing the pick is for those players, so it doesn’t distort the rest of the board. Or, ideally, it’s a more sizable drop back to land either a Day 2 pick this year or a first-rounder next year.

    Q: Is a tackle a realistic option? Everyone seems to be mocking a tackle to the Rams at No. 13.

    A: It’s realistic, but I wouldn’t call it the most likely scenario.

    If the Rams are taking a tackle at No. 13, it’s because they see him as a clear talent upgrade over Warren McClendon Jr. That can be worth upgrading a premium position and locking in a controlled salary for five years, which matters as McClendon enters a contract year.

    With Georgia’s Monroe Freeling expected to go in the top 10, the group of options could include Miami’s Francis Mauigoa, Alabama’s Kadyn Proctor and Utah’s two tackles, Spencer Fano and Caleb Lomu. Each is talented but has some questions, and where the Rams land on the answers will dictate if they are real options: Do they see Mauigoa, Proctor and Fano as tackles rather than guards? Do they believe Lomu and Proctor can transition from left to right tackle?

    The Rams need a swing tackle, so drafting a starter here could move McClendon back into that role. But McClendon found a much better fit by locking in at right tackle last season, so they’d also have to believe he’s ready to do both at a higher level than he has previously shown.

    I expect the Rams to make multiple offensive line selections in this draft. Left tackle Alaric Jackson is the only starter under contract after next season, and it feels like a stretch for this team to extend McClendon and guards Steve Avila and Kevin Dotson if they also want to keep Nacua, Byron Young and Kobie Turner. They need depth at nearly every spot, too.

    If the best player available is a tackle and it’s the No. 13 pick, I could see the upgrade happening. I would view it as less likely than a wide receiver, which is where the Rams have both present and future needs to solve, and know for certain that their current options are not good enough to fill.

    #163289
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from Nate Atkins

    Previous post.

    Best discussion of pick 13 we’ve had yet.

    #163295
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    The Rams met with Caleb Douglas.
    6’4. 205 Lbs. 4.39 speed.
    Projected going tween 4th and 6th rounds.

    Footballguys: “Douglas is a towering receiver with good movement skills for his size. He has the versatility teams crave when rounding out a receiver room, playing both outside and in the slot, and impacting the passing game at all three depths. Vertically, he can outplay defensive backs in the air, translating as a red-zone threat. He transitions quickly and is comfortable after the catch. Douglas is worth watching throughout the draft process and is a legitimate threat to land on Day 2.”

    w
    v

    #163297
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    The Rams met with Caleb Douglas.

    See today’s entry in this thread: WR draft 2026… gets its own thread , https://theramshuddle.com/topic/wr-draft-2026-gets-its-own-thread/page/2/#post-163296

    #163300
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    They do the Rams at 27:03 in. Jourdan Rodrique takes OT at the 13 spot: “McVay likes skill players….but If cooler heads prevail….”

    #163308
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    CC and JM just dont think this draft class is strong, in general.

    CC thinks part of the reason is ‘blue state parents’ arent letting their kids play football.

    #163310
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    CC and JM just dont think this draft class is strong, in general.

    It’s not strong at the top, but said to be deep at some key positions. Not deep all the way into day 3, but deep into day 2.

    As we know, next year’s is supposed to be stronger overall.

    #163317
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #163324
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Daniel Jeremiah@MoveTheSticks
    This draft is deep at Edge, WR & OL.

    #163326
    Avatar photocanadaram
    Participant

    With the depth at WR in this draft I would not be disappointed if the Rams waited until later to pick one and made a surprise pick like taking DT, Kayden McDonald in the first round. Seems unlikely as I think they are going to pick a skilled position player on offense, but man McDonald has some serious traits that would make him a problem for opposing offenses. Ultimately, I just want a good player. I bet some of you are hoping that they take a bad player,but I’m here to tell you that is no way to build a winning football team

    #163335
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #163336
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I bet some of you are hoping that they take a bad player,but I’m here to tell you that is no way to build a winning football team

    They tried that, especially in the 90s and then 2000 through 2010. ‘

    It didn’t work.

    #163338
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Nate Atkins@NateAtkins_
    The most ideal scenario to me is a WR in the first round and then multiple depth/developmental OL in rounds 3-5.

    But if Tate, Lemon and Tyson are all off the board at No. 13, what do you do if the trade back offers are bad?

    Cesar@CesarsBurner
    I see an OT mocked to the Rams, I stop reading.

    Pray this doesn’t happen.

    Nate Atkins@NateAtkins_
    I get that. Not my favorite idea for the Rams at No. 13 either.

    But I think there’s a reality about the OL that will play out somewhere in this draft. It’s hard to envision paying McClendon, Dotson, Avila and Coleman next year with Puka, Young and Turner needing new deals, too.

    Al@TheWolfOfIndex
    surely mclendon extends for cheap then you just pay for one of avila/dotson

    Nate Atkins@NateAtkins_
    Not sure it will be cheap. If he has a good year and hits the open market, he’s in a prime spot at a premium position and will want to cash in as a fifth-round pick.

    All Day Rams@Alldayrams
    Do you feel like a Byron Young deal is inevitable because most Rams fans aren’t counting on that?

    Nate Atkins@NateAtkins_
    Not inevitable, no. I wouldn’t describe any of these potential extensions that way at this point.

    #163350
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I think there’s a reality about the OL that will play out somewhere in this draft. It’s hard to envision paying McClendon, Dotson, Avila and Coleman next year with Puka, Young and Turner needing new deals, too.

    Jeremy Fowler@JFowlerESPN
    In talking to teams today, wouldn’t be surprised to see four OTs go in first 15-17 picks.

    Francis Mauigoa, Spencer Fano are consensus. Monroe Freeling, Kadyn Proctor have worked their way into conversation — feet, length, prototype LT and SEC pedigree.

    NFC exec: ‘Would have said no on Freeling in November but I can see it now. He fits the mold.’

    AFC exec on Proctor: ‘He’s the go-higher-than-you-think guy for me.’

    #163357
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    from https://theramswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/rams/2026/04/20/2026-nfl-draft-rams-edge-rusher-adam-schefter-report/89705028007/?taid=69e6e84a1045c000015b6c17&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

    NFL insider Adam Schefter believes that while most people have the Rams selecting a wide receiver early in the draft, the edge position could be a route they’re looking to explore as they seek solutions for the financial puzzle that sits in front of them.

    On the Adam Schefter podcast, Schefter went into the thought process behind his claim.

    “I’ll tell you the sneaky one that’s interesting on the Rams,” stated Schefter. “Will Anderson, last week, got paid $50 million a year. Let’s keep this in mind, the Rams have two pass rushers that they’re probably going to have to pay, Byron Young and Jared Verse.”

    “Will Anderson gets $50 million a year. Can they afford to pay both those guys? Now, I know last year, they went out and drafted Josaiah Stewart as a pass rusher, but you can never have enough pass rushers in this league. And I think a fallback option would be a pass rusher here. And people might say, ‘Whoa, what are the Rams doing?’ Well, they’re preparing for the day that they can’t keep both Byron Young and Jared Verse as much as they love both players, because you can’t pay everybody in this league.”

    #163361
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    What I’m hearing and thinking about the Rams entering the NFL Draft

    Nate Atkins

    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7218091/2026/04/22/rams-2026-nfl-draft-carnell-tate/?source=emp_shared_article&unlocked_article_code=1.c1A.mxu-.zxP6qOdlZ3ka

    For the first time in more than a decade, the Los Angeles Rams will make a pick in the top half of the first round.

    That alone makes this year’s NFL Draft intriguing. And then you remember how high the goals are this season. The Rams want to finish it at SoFi Stadium, raising another Lombardi Trophy.

    The draft class generally plays a smaller role in such a feat than some realize. It serves to widen a championship window, not necessarily break through it. Then again, rarely are contenders drafting as high as No. 13 overall. As muted as the Rams made last year’s draft by trading out of the first round, they delayed the bang until this year.

    The first half was a blockbuster trade for All-Pro cornerback Trent McDuffie. The second half will arrive on Thursday night. And so will more players who will represent Los Angeles’ attempt to plug the holes for a championship push.

    Here’s what I’m thinking and hearing about the Rams heading into the draft.

    Signs keep pointing to a WR

    To maximize this top 15 pick, the Rams need to find a player who can start as a rookie without pushing a good veteran to the bench. I only see three positions where that’s realistic: linebacker, wide receiver and maybe tight end.

    This draft has one true linebacker the league keeps buzzing about in the first round: Ohio State’s Sonny Styles. The buzz is so strong that it seems hard to picture him making it out of the top eight picks or so.

    The Rams could trade up for Styles and treat him as the finishing touch on their defense — the one spot left where they could use a real impact boost. With his coverage and blitzing skills, the fit makes a ton of sense. The issue is how to trade up. If it costs the second-round pick, that means not addressing the biggest need at wide receiver until the third.

    Head coach Sean McVay is looking hard at that position, as evidenced by the exploration into trading for the Philadelphia Eagles’ A.J. Brown. McVay is an 11-personnel coach at heart and wants to avoid being boxed schematically in a high-stakes game. He has a star receiver in Puka Nacua, who’s working to earn an extension after a trip to a holistic care facility, and another in Davante Adams, who will turn 34 in December. They are both in contract years and missed three games last season.

    The Rams have options here. They could trade up for Ohio State’s Carnell Tate. They could stand pat and hope one of Makai Lemon or Jordyn Tyson is available. If not, they could take Washington’s Denzel Boston. They could try to trade back and take either Texas A&M’s KC Concepcion or Indiana’s Omar Cooper Jr. They also could attack it on Day 2 or possibly even later, given their long track record of finding stars like Nacua and Cooper Kupp that way.

    However, the need for a potential No. 1 receiver could change the sense of urgency. It all comes down to their faith that Nacua will earn the monster extension he’s working toward. Because if he doesn’t, the Rams can’t trust a Matthew Stafford replacement to play without Adams or Nacua if a star isn’t ready to emerge in their place.

    Why Tate can be the answer

    Here’s what else I took away from the Rams’ pursuit of a Brown trade:

    They weren’t looking for an upgrade on Adams so much as a No. 1 receiver to lock in for years to come. That’s valuable in a post-Adams world, but its real value comes if a post-Nacua world ever has to exist.

    Everyone’s hope is for Nacua to lock in, mature off the field and become the cornerstone receiver on a hefty new contract. But it’s still in the hope stage, as he’s just recently returned. They need a pattern of behavior to undo what sent him into the care facility. That kind of growth takes time to build real trust.

    The decision to stick with Adams over Brown was a window into how much the push for a Super Bowl in 2026 outweighs all other concerns. But the opportunity cost was the future No. 1 in Brown. Can the Rams still find that? They can if they trade up for Tate.

    He’s widely viewed as the one durable receiver in this class who profiles as a true No. 1 option. He didn’t get much chance to truly be that at Ohio State, where he shared the field with Jeremiah Smith, but his size, testing, production, track record and play style all measure up with what a No. 1 option is.

    And he comes from the factory that keeps churning them out at Ohio State, home to Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Terry McLaurin, Garrett Wilson, Chris Olave, Emeka Egbuka and Marvin Harrison Jr.

    Tyson has that kind of upside, but he also comes with injury risk that I think could be too much to stomach at this position in 2026. I also don’t think he’s the yards-after-catch player McVay tends to like.

    Lemon or Boston could become a No. 1 in a system perfectly tailored to make them that. Lemon has long been a tremendous fit for the Rams, but he, too, is a question to make it to No. 13. Boston could be a good fallback plan if he’s not. However, both project closer to No. 2 receivers than No. 1.

    The No. 1 receiver role on this team in the future will be like a lifeline to the quarterback they find to replace Stafford. That’s why it’s so important, and so tricky not to know yet if Nacua will or won’t be that for them.

    The doomsday scenario I see for the Rams in this draft is if they sit at No. 13 and Tate, Lemon and Tyson are off the board, and so are the players teams would trade up for, such as Ohio State safety Caleb Downs or Notre Dame running back Jeremiyah Love. That was the spot I found myself in my final seven-round mock draft, when I took Georgia offensive tackle Monroe Freeling.

    To ensure it doesn’t happen, the Rams could trade up. After all, they’ve been pushing for trades into the top 10 in recent years, and they’ve never been as close as they are now.

    In our 32-team mock draft this week, I traded up with the Cleveland Browns at No. 6, sending out this year’s second-round pick and next year’s fifth-rounder. Then I took Tate.

    The Rams have seven picks, but it’s hard to see seven rookies making this 53-man roster unless injuries hit in training camp. The Rams would be wise to trade up somewhere to fill one of their two remaining needs of wide receiver and linebacker.

    The one scenario where the Rams can comfortably afford to lose their second-round pick is in knocking the wide receiver need out of the park.

    Why backup QB is a giant mystery box

    When the season ended, the Rams fully expected to roll back Stafford and Jimmy Garoppolo for another run. The Stafford decision was smooth. The Garoppolo one has been the opposite. He had a market in free agency, then he began contemplating retirement, and that’s where he still is as the Rams enter the draft.

    They came up with a Plan B for Garoppolo with Kirk Cousins, given his similar experience level and familiarity with McVay’s system. But Cousins found gold in free agency with the Las Vegas Raiders.

    Before the McDuffie trade, the Rams had a perfect spot to draft a quarterback to sit and learn for a year with the No. 29 pick. They could get their impact player at No. 13 and then a quarterback to stash. That’s where a player like Alabama’s Ty Simpson made sense.

    However, Simpson does not appear to be worth the No. 13 pick, but he’s not expected to last until the second round either. They could trade back and take him, but I still don’t think spending the top pick on a backup player is chasing the right impact — or maximizing the 2027 quarterback draft class.

    “It’s a tough class, to be honest. There’s nobody who really jumps out at you,” one team scout said.

    And yet that backup role is a must for the Rams to fill with a quarterback who is 38, managing a degenerative back issue and has had some tough injuries before.

    In the NFC West, the Rams need a backup who can step in for a month and deliver a 2-2 record or better. That was Garoppolo. There is a limited number of quarterbacks in this year’s draft.

    Stetson Bennett is one of their backup quarterbacks, too. I expect him to remain the third-stringer this season. The job is too important with this team right now.

    So, can the Rams gamble by not taking a quarterback this week? How much do they spend on a backup player?

    One option I like in the third round is LSU’s Garrett Nussmeier. Just one year ago, he was expected to be a top-10 pick before a brutal final season at LSU. But he played that through an abdominal injury and with a disastrous run game and offensive line.

    His 2024 play showed the size, arm strength and angles he can throw from — all tools that could be fun to develop for a year behind Stafford while trusting him enough to be the backup. A coach’s son like Nussmeier might take well to that role.

    Penn State’s Drew Allar is another option with a similar background. He, too, was thought of as a first-round pick a year ago.

    If the draft doesn’t turn out a backup quarterback and Garoppolo doesn’t return, the Rams should look to Tyrod Taylor. I don’t see them having any interest in trading for reclamation projects like Anthony Richardson or Will Levis, given their focus on high-level operations and readiness.

    This is the year to draft O-linemen

    I’m willing to make one prediction about the Rams: I think they will draft multiple offensive linemen this weekend. That is, despite not needing a single starter for this season.

    The Rams have four of their five starters under contract for exactly one more season. Guards Steve Avila and Kevin Dotson, center Coleman Shelton and right tackle Warren McClendon Jr. are all entering contract years. At the same time, Nacua, Byron Young and Kobie Turner are also playing out contract years.

    The depth behind those linemen was already a concern at nearly every spot. The interior line is also one of this draft class’ best positions.

    Because the Rams don’t need a starter here, picking one at No. 13 becomes less likely. The Rams would need to see a tackle prospect as a legitimate talent upgrade over McClendon, whom they took in the fifth round in 2023. That’s possible if the top of the draft is receiver-heavy.

    In that scenario, I think it’s more likely the Rams trade down than take a tackle. If they slide back within 10 spots, either Boston or Oregon tight end Kenyon Sadiq makes the most sense. Sadiq is the only tight end who can fit Los Angeles in this draft, as he can be a devastating blocker at 241 pounds and also a mismatch threat as the fastest tight end the combine has seen since at least 2003.

    However, here’s the reality: Offensive lines are expensive, and the only way to keep them in check is to draft eventual starters. It might be natural to think McClendon won’t be too expensive to retain, but consider that 24 different tackles in the NFL make at least $18 million annually, and that salary would rank fifth on the Rams’ roster right now.

    If McClendon has a strong season and hits the open market, he isn’t coming cheap. Meanwhile, draft picks come with suppressed set salaries for four seasons.

    It makes too much sense to draft and develop future starters from this year’s strong class as depth pieces to ensure the protection around Stafford is as strong as it needs to be.

    • This reply was modified 1 day, 16 hours ago by Avatar photozn.
Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 32 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.