Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Rams achilles heel?
- This topic has 13 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 2 months, 2 weeks ago by
zn.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 10, 2025 at 1:25 pm #160079
wvParticipantSo, what is the Rams major flaw this year? What can derail them?
I saw Mina saying they have issues with Big Wide Recievers like AJ Brown.
Is the secondary subpar? Below average without Lake?
w
vDecember 10, 2025 at 1:55 pm #160080
znModeratorSo, what is the Rams major flaw this year? What can derail them?
I saw Mina saying they have issues with Big Wide Recievers like AJ Brown.
Is the secondary subpar? Below average without Lake?
w
vI would not say it’s subpar or below avg. without Lake, but it’s also not a strength.
Obviously though Detroit and Seattle will be the big tests.
December 10, 2025 at 7:14 pm #160093
ZooeyModeratorI’d say it’s still the kicking game.
The secondary was performing very well until Lake got hurt. He is expected back for the playoffs last I heard, though, and the Rams ARE making the playoffs.
The new guy hasn’t missed a kick yet, but he hasn’t kicked under pressure yet, either. Or under difficult conditions. Jury’s out on that, I think.
So they have a couple of question marks, but neither one looks like an Achilles heel to me. The Rams are doing so many things right this year that I think the thing most likely to derail them is an uncharacteristic game of multiple bad turnovers, like against Carolina. They just have been more consistent and better all-around than anybody else this year, and I don’t think any team is in their league with the possible exception of Seattle, but Seattle has made hay against a softer schedule than the Rams have had.
I seriously have no doubt that the Rams are better than the Eagles, 49ers, and Panthers – the only teams to beat them so far – and I believe they are better than the Lions, Packers, Pats, Broncos, what-have-you. I don’t think they are going to coast to the SB, but I think they will be favored in every game in the post-season. You know…barring injury (same old disclaimer).
December 10, 2025 at 8:36 pm #160097
wvParticipantI’d say it’s still the kicking game.
… – and I believe they are better than the Lions, Packers, Pats, Broncos, what-have-you. I don’t think they are going to coast to the SB, but I think they will be favored in every game in the post-season. You know…barring injury (same old disclaimer).
Better than the Packers? I dunno. What if they have to play in Lambeau?
I would have said the Rams were better until the Micah trade.Did you know, The Packers have beaten McVay and the rams 5 times in a row.
https://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/green-bay-packers/teamvsteam?opp=29w
vDecember 10, 2025 at 8:47 pm #160098
InvaderRamModeratorseahawks played them really well. only thing stopping the seahawks was sam darnold.
if rams somehow lose homefield advantage and have to play seahawks on the road i worry. their defense looked good and smith-njigba really hurt them.
December 10, 2025 at 11:09 pm #160106
ZooeyModeratorBetter than the Packers? I dunno. What if they have to play in Lambeau?
I would have said the Rams were better until the Micah trade.I’m basing my opinion merely on irrefutable scientific evidence.
The Rams are rated higher than any other team in terms of offensive and defensive production, and they have produced those rankings against a harder schedule. They’re disciplined in terms of penalties, and their coaching is top tier. I think that if you pose the question of an Achilles heel for all the other contenders, you will get a more emphatic response. I haven’t watched the Packers this year, but so far they seem to be less consistent in their performance.
I am not saying the Rams are lightyears above the competition. I am saying they have been more consistently good in all respects than any other team has been. So far.
We’ll see. But right now, the betting odds have the Rams #1, the Seahawks #2, and the Packers #3 to win the Super Bowl.
“And that’s the way it is.” ~ Walter Cronkite
December 11, 2025 at 7:30 am #160117
wvParticipantseahawks played them really well. only thing stopping the seahawks was sam darnold.
if rams somehow lose homefield advantage and have to play seahawks on the road i worry. their defense looked good and smith-njigba really hurt them.
I saw an interview with Mike Macdonald after the Darnold meltdown-game. And he was asked about Darnold and he kinda doubled-down on letting Sam just rip the ball all over the place. Sounded a bit like Martz.
I remember thinking, if it were ME, next time Sam played the Rams, I’d reign him in a bit. Just let him manage a short, safe, passing game, and try and win the game with the defense. But Macdonald seems like he wants to attack.
Should be interesting in Seattle.
w
vDecember 11, 2025 at 10:36 am #160125
znModeratorPARAM
Over the first 6 games [Rams] went 4-2, scoring an average of 23.3 PPG and allowing 18.3 PPG (+5 PPG) vs a winning percentage of .526.
Over the last 7 games we’ve gone 6-1 scoring an average of 34.0 PPG, while allowing 16.7 PPG (+17.3 PPG) vs a winning percentage of .527.
PARAM
Seattle opponents so far have a .431 win pct.
Their 4 game finish has a .666 win pct.
I think they’re good…..you don’t get to 10 wins being a sissy team…..but I don’t think they’re nearly as good as the Rams. I could see the Seahawks losing 2 more.
December 11, 2025 at 11:39 am #160131
ZooeyModeratorSuper Bowl Survivor: Which two teams are left standing in one of the NFL’s most unpredictable seasons?
Using six championship trends, we narrowed 23 contenders down to the final two teams with a real path to Super Bowl LXThe NFL script writers have cooked up one of their best seasons ever in 2025. Every division race is tight as we enter the final month of the season. The traditional superpowers have left the door open for new contenders as the Chiefs and Eagles look cooked. Some of the league’s top quarterbacks are currently on the outside looking in, and now 44-year-old Philip Rivers has pounded his fist on the table and says he wants a piece.
In many ways, this is the most wide-open Super Bowl race ever.
There are 10 teams with at least nine wins, tied for the most entering Week 15 in the last 40 years.
*Last season’s Super Bowl teams (Chiefs and Eagles) are 3-7 since the start of November.
*The current top three seeds in the AFC (Broncos, Patriots and Jaguars) were 18-33 last season, and none of the current AFC division leaders won their division last season.
*This could be the first postseason without Tom Brady or Patrick Mahomes since 2008.
*Looking at the 23 teams still in Super Bowl contention, you could make a legitimate Super Bowl case for 10 to 15 of them. At this point, it just feels like March Madness. If you can get into the dance, anything can happen.On the one hand, I’m looking forward to an unpredictable ending. That’s especially true in the AFC, where one of Patrick Mahomes, Joe Burrow, Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, Joe Flacco or Ben Roethlisberger have represented the conference in the last 22 Super Bowls. There might be room for a new name — finally.
On the other hand, I work in numbers. They may not always hold true, but they usually provide a pretty good indication of where we’re heading. In this case, I used six trends that are good indicators of championship-caliber teams to narrow the field of 23 to just two for Super Bowl LX.
23 teams in Super Bowl contention
Let’s get familiar with the field. Feast your eyes on this beauty pageant of 23 teams still alive for the Lombardi Trophy. No surprise, the Jets and Browns are nowhere to be found. I am pretty surprised the Commanders aren’t on this list after making the NFC title game last season, though. Plus, I didn’t think the Raiders would already be out after a busy offseason bringing in Pete Carroll, Chip Kelly, Geno Smith and Ashton Jeanty.The Patriots are still here. Not bad after losing 13 games last year. Anyway, let’s hop to it. We’re going trend-by-trend to eliminate teams until we get down to two in a game of Super Bowl survivor.
AFC contenders
Patriots
Bills
Dolphins
Steelers
Ravens
Bengals
Jaguars
Texans
Colts
Broncos
Chargers
ChiefsNFC contenders
Eagles
Cowboys
Packers
Bears
Lions
Vikings
Buccaneers
Panthers
Rams
Seahawks
49ersWeeding out the bad teams
Only one team has ever won a Super Bowl with a negative point differential in the regular season: the 2011 Giants. That history eliminates nine teams.Dolphins, Steelers, Vikings, Bengals, Buccaneers and Panthers:
This is a no-brainer. There are teams on this list that just don’t belong, so we need to weed them out. I don’t think anybody is going to miss them.
team logo
Ravens: Baltimore might have beef for getting booted off the island, but it just lost to a slumping Steelers team. Controversy or not, it was a costly loss.team logo
Cowboys: Dallas has come on lately, but it just reminded us that Quinnen Williams can’t save a defense that gives the offense little margin for error.Bears: Chicago has a chance to be this year’s Cinderella, and it has only been outscored by one point. The Bears just pushed the Packers at Lambeau and Ben Johnson brings juice — shirtless celebrations and all.
But the résumé still doesn’t hold up. This defense isn’t good enough to win a title. They’ve played the easiest schedule in the NFC, tied an NFL record with five wins when trailing in the final two minutes, and lead the league in takeaways.
That’s a lot of regression signs. It’s hard to trust a 9–4 team that’s been outscored on the year. Goodbye, Chicago!
Remaining AFC contenders
Patriots
Bills
Jaguars
Texans
Colts
Broncos
Chargers
Chiefs
Remaining NFC contenders
Eagles
Packers
Lions
Rams
Seahawks
49ers
Must be elite on one side of the ball
The last 12 — and 56 of the last 59 — Super Bowl champions finished top seven in scoring offense or scoring defense (or both).To win a Super Bowl, you have to be elite on at least one side of the ball. You can survive a dreadful offense (2000 Ravens, 2002 Buccaneers, 2015 Broncos) if your defense is historic. You can survive a soft defense (2006 Colts, 2009 Saints) if your offense is electric. What you really can’t do is win it all when you’re merely average to above average on both sides — not unless you catch lightning in a bottle like the 2011 Giants or 2012 Ravens.
So we say goodbye to four more teams.
team logo
Chargers: Los Angeles faces an uphill climb without either of its starting offensive tackles.Eagles: Nobody outside of Philadelphia is going to miss this team. The offense has been miserable, capped by Monday’s five-turnover disaster from Jalen Hurts. The defense just got shredded by the Bears on Black Friday.
team logo
49ers: San Francisco has navigated a soft schedule to get to 9–4, but its offense lacks explosiveness and the defense hasn’t been the same without Nick Bosa and Fred Warner.team logo
Jaguars: You could make a case for Jacksonville. The Jaguars have won four straight, and their only post-deadline loss was blowing a 19-point fourth-quarter lead to Houston. Their defense ranks fourth in EPA per game since the deadline and the passing game is showing signs of life.But do we really trust Trevor Lawrence or Liam Coen right now? A rookie head coach hasn’t won a Super Bowl since George Seifert in 1989 — and he inherited Joe Montana, Jerry Rice and the West Coast offense. It’s safe to let Jacksonville go.
Remaining AFC contenders
Patriots
Bills
Texans
Colts
Broncos
ChiefsRemaining NFC contenders
Packers
Lions
Rams
SeahawksMust make critical stops
None of the last 18 Super Bowl champions were bottom 10 in third-down conversion rate allowed.To win a Super Bowl, a defense has to make critical stops to get off the field. That tracks. But this is where things start to get a little testy.
Here are the three teams eliminated:
team logo
Bills: Do the Bills really have to go here? You could pick from a handful of potentially fatal flaws. They still don’t have a true go-to target for Josh Allen. They can’t stop the run (27th in success rate) and their pass rush doesn’t scare anyone (except maybe Aaron Rodgers). Buffalo sits right on the edge of this category as the 10th-worst third-down defense, but you can easily see how that side of the ball could again be its undoing.Then again, if they finally don’t have to go through Patrick Mahomes in the AFC playoffs… maybe this is the team of destiny. We’ll see.
team logo
Chiefs: Kansas City could still run the table and get some help from the Chargers to sneak in. But one thing that could derail both its postseason chances and its bid for a fourth straight Super Bowl appearance is surprisingly simple: the blitz has gone flat.As ESPN’s Mina Kimes pointed out on X, Kansas City ranks 29th in yards per play allowed and 31st in sack rate when blitzing this year — after finishing top five in both metrics from 2022–24. If Steve Spagnuolo’s pressure packages aren’t landing, the Chiefs aren’t getting off the field on third down. Combine that with an aging roster, no explosiveness in the run game and Mahomes missing the deep ball, and the blitz becomes one more serving of humble pie.
team logo
Colts: We could list a dozen reasons the Colts won’t be in Super Bowl LX. Let’s leave the defense alone and just enjoy the Philip Rivers subplot for a moment. For what it’s worth, the last team to win a Super Bowl with a bottom-10 third-down defense was the 2006 Colts — and Rex Grossman wasn’t able to make them pay for it in the big game.Remaining AFC contenders
Patriots
Texans
BroncosRemaining NFC contenders
Packers
Lions
Rams
SeahawksWin close games
The last 14 — and 23 of the last 25 — Super Bowl champions were .500 or better in one-score games during the regular season.Now we’re down to the wire. The margin for error is razor thin, so we’re trimming the contenders that have been inconsistent in close games.
Here are the two teams eliminated:
team logo
Lions: I don’t feel too bad about getting rid of the Lions here. They are 3-4 in one-score games, so they’re right on the edge, but who really trusts them? I don’t trust Jared Goff, that defense or Dan Campbell’s wild fourth-down gambles to win four games for Detroit in the postseason — potentially four road games.The Lions haven’t converted a fourth down in over a month, and without those momentum swings they’ve dropped close games to the Eagles and Packers. Chances are they will live … and die … with fourth-down gambles in the playoffs.
team logo
Texans: With this defense, almost every game will be a one-score game for the Texans. They are 4–5 in one-score games this year, but have won four straight, and that doesn’t include Sunday night’s win in Kansas City when they were tied in the fourth quarter before closing on a 10–0 run. The defense is electric, as Josh Allen and Patrick Mahomes can attest to.Nobody should be surprised if their offense (and offensive line) lets them down in a close playoff game — if they even make it.
Remaining AFC contenders
Patriots
BroncosRemaining NFC contenders
Packers
Rams
SeahawksClutch kicks
Only one of the last 25 Super Bowl champions ranked in the bottom five in field goal percentage (the 2022 Chiefs).Then there were five. Sometimes the last game of the season comes down to one kick — just ask Adam Vinatieri or Scott Norwood. Harrison Butker drilled a 57-yarder in Super Bowl LVIII in a game the Chiefs eventually won in overtime against the 49ers.
Since 2000, there have been 100 potential game-tying or go-ahead field goal attempts in the fourth quarter or overtime of playoff games. That’s roughly four critical kicks per year. If it comes off the wrong leg, you might be staring at a double doink and a quick exit.
Here are the two teams eliminated:
team logo
Packers: Green Bay fans have every right to be uneasy about Brandon McManus. He missed a 40-plus-yard attempt in a three-point home loss to the Panthers last month, and followed that with a 64-yarder to tie the Eagles that wasn’t even in the right area code. He’s 15 of 21 on field goals this season.team logo
Rams: Los Angeles’ only real weakness right now is its kicking game. The team is 13 of 18 on field goals this year and had a disastrous finish in Philadelphia earlier this season, when Joshua Karty had two field goals blocked in the fourth quarter — including one for the win.Harrison Mevis is kicking now, but the Rams have attempted just four field goals over their last seven games, and none in pressure situations. If anything is going to take down the Super Bowl favorites, it’s probably the kicking game. And if any team understands how important postseason kicking is, it’s them.
Remaining AFC contenders
Patriots
BroncosRemaining NFC contenders
SeahawksTrenches
Twenty-one of the last 23 Super Bowl champions had a positive sack differential.The final category to eliminate a Super Bowl contender is, surprisingly, not quarterback play. It’s the guys who get overlooked the most — the dudes in the trenches. We saw how critical they were in last year’s Super Bowl, when the Eagles’ front four destroyed the Chiefs.
team logo
Patriots: That’s why I’m eliminating the Patriots. They’re bottom 10 in sack rate and pressure rate allowed this year, and they’ve already given up 40 sacks. Drake Maye has been terrific against pressure and outside the pocket, but don’t be shocked if this becomes New England’s undoing, especially if it runs into the Broncos’ or Texans’ pass rush in January.If you need more convincing, here’s one more historical nugget: the 1999 Rams are the only team ever to win a Super Bowl after a season with four or fewer wins. The Patriots’ turnaround has been miraculous too, so maybe they could become the second team to pull this off.
Super Bowl LX matchup: Broncos vs Seahawks
And then there were two. The Broncos and Seahawks win this survivor pool, and if the trends hold, maybe we’ll see a Super Bowl rematch in Super Bowl LX thanks to two of the best defenses in the NFL. The Broncos lead the league in sacks, and the Seahawks lead the league in pressures.Both teams have big question marks at quarterback, but it isn’t impossible for either signal-caller to do enough to make a run. Bo Nix has been clutch in the fourth quarter, fueling a string of Broncos comebacks, and the Seahawks still have one of the most explosive passing games in the league with Sam Darnold. I’d be the first to admit I don’t fully trust either, but I can absolutely be convinced of a path where these two teams end up meeting at Levi’s Stadium on Feb. 8.
So as you’re scratching your head on Sundays wondering who’s going to be left standing when it’s all said and done, remember what the numbers say: Denver or Seattle.
December 11, 2025 at 12:02 pm #160132
znModeratorRams: Los Angeles’ only real weakness right now is its kicking game. The team is 13 of 18 on field goals this year and had a disastrous finish in Philadelphia earlier this season, when Joshua Karty had two field goals blocked in the fourth quarter — including one for the win.
Harrison Mevis is kicking now, but the Rams have attempted just four field goals over their last seven games, and none in pressure situations. If anything is going to take down the Super Bowl favorites, it’s probably the kicking game. And if any team understands how important postseason kicking is, it’s them.
I don’t agree that the kicking game is a problem. They not only replaced Karty, they replaced their long snapper, and if you look at inactives lists, you see that they shuffled the blockers on the FG/XP kicking unit.
The fact that they have not kicked that many FGs is not because they’re avoiding kicks. Bizarrely, the article seems to hint at that. Naw they have not been kicking FGs because the offense is on such a tear right now. They are first in the league in points scored in the first quarter. They are 3rd in this very important stat: NFL Team Red Zone Scoring Percentage (TD only)
They have not needed to kick FGs.
That does not mean the kicker is a problem, it means we don’t really know where he stands. Mevis does, however, have a good history.
Here’s the wiki on him:
College career
As a sophomore, Mevis emerged as one of the premier place kickers in the nation, going 23/25 (93%) on field goal attempts. He also was a perfect 3/3 on field goals longer than 50 yards with a long of 56 yards. … Following his sophomore season, Mevis was named a first team All-American. On September 16, 2023, during the closing seconds of a game against 15th–ranked Kansas State, Mevis kicked a 61-yard field goal to win the game 30–27 for Missouri, breaking the record for the longest field goal in SEC history. In his Senior Night game, he hit a 30-yard game winning field goal vs the Florida Gators to win 33–31.Birmingham Stallions
On December 6, 2024, Mevis signed with the Birmingham Stallions of the United Football League (UFL). In week 7, Mevis went 3-for-3 on field goal attempts with a long of 52 yards and was named the UFL special teams player of the weekThat’s not “having done it for the Rams yet,” but it is very solid potential. Those are real accomplishments.
I think he got overlooked by teams because he does not have a “traditional kicker’s build” (ie. lean) and therefore strikes some coaching types as too “atypical.” He looks like a fatty, and NFL coaches don’t “go there.” (Well unless you’re an O-lineman.)
Not only that but on one of his kicks, I forget which one, he did face a rusher who had beaten the blocking, and it did not faze him one bit. He didn’t “hurry up” but stayed in focus and hit his typical hard, high, right-up-the-middle kick.
I think with Karty there were problems with the blocking and the long snapper, and it undermined him. I think Mevis has much tougher composure and has very little in the way of “nerves.” Plus they fixed the blocking issues anyway.
That’s what I have seen so far.
Plus! Ironically, Seattle lost to the Rams because they missed a last second clutch FG.
…
December 11, 2025 at 2:03 pm #160135
ZooeyModeratorI don’t agree that the kicking game is a problem. They not only replaced Karty, they replaced their long snapper, and if you look at inactives lists, you see that they shuffled the blockers on the FG/XP kicking unit.
The fact that they have not kicked that many FGs is not because they’re avoiding kicks. Bizarrely, the article seems to hint at that. Naw they have not been kicking FGs because the offense is on such a tear right now. They are first in the league in points scored in the first quarter. They are 3rd in this very important stat: NFL Team Red Zone Scoring Percentage (TD only)
They have not needed to kick FGs.
That does not mean the kicker is a problem, it means we don’t really know where he stands. Mevis does, however, have a good history.
I agree with that. I don’t think “kicker is a problem.” As I said earlier, I think it’s a “question,” only because Mevis hasn’t “done it” yet for the Rams.
I had the same reaction to that writer that you did. I suspect the article was actually written by Nittany Ram because it seemed to lean into Seattle on a flimsy premise.
December 20, 2025 at 11:48 am #160433
znModeratorI don’t agree that the kicking game is a problem.
I still think Mevis is okay. One miss is just something that happens…too soon to think kicking is a problem, IMO. It was the TD on a punt return that causes worry.
Basically STs lost them 3 games this year. After much thought and cold hard analysis, I have decided that my fully considered view of that is, that ain’t good.
December 20, 2025 at 12:22 pm #160435
wvParticipantI don’t agree that the kicking game is a problem.
I still think Mevis is okay. One miss is just something that happens…too soon to think kicking is a problem, IMO. It was the TD on a punt return that causes worry.
Basically STs lost them 3 games this year. After much thought and cold hard analysis, I have decided that my fully considered view of that is, that ain’t good.
Did you see the vid where one of the Seattle players talked about seeing a weakness on the Rams punt coverage team, and they capitalized on it. He said something about working on taking the return to the left or somethin like that.
w
vDecember 20, 2025 at 12:30 pm #160436 -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

