Pretty harsh on Tru, for one thing without those PI’s both throws were tds.

Great post ! Kap fumbled at least twice, ZN posted a nice Gif of it.

WOW GREAT GAME DEFENSE!

Warrick Dunn

zn wrote:

Have at it.

Who has a silver lining?

ZN I am not liking having my posts micro managed. The comment “and Barnes” makes even less sense than usual when you move it to from the OL thread and lump it in with the post game venting stuff.The silver lining is this minor annoyance got my mind off the 2 hour abomination I just watched.

zn wrote:

Are people re-thinking Fisher a bit after a win?

Nope. He’s always good for some trickery but I’ve seen enough. Of course I’m one of those guys that thinks the Music City Miracle was a forward pass,that the Titans ran into Wilkins and it should of been a penalty,that the Titans were intentionally trying to injure preseason 2000. They didn’t get much better today just a little luckier and the Refs were Fisher fans for some reason .

Well if he can learn from it ,a game winning ball security lesson against the World Champs no less it will be the best lesson ever!

When you watch the St.louis Garbage men play you can see they are not a well coached team. Fisher is a half assed mediocre 8 and 8 type coach. I’d love to see him gone the sooner the better.

This team in no longer the Rams to me. They will be known as the St.louis garbage men from now until they when a super bowl

zn wrote:

PA Ram wrote:
he Rams have the #1 defense in football against the pass.

I think that’s misleading.

They’re 1st in passing attempts against, meaning, they are thrown on the least of all 32 teams.

But they are 26th in yards per attempt passing on defense.

Which means if anyone DOES start throwing on them, they will give up lots of yards.

They are throwing less to avoid taking sacks,when they do throw it’s short getting the
ball out quick.

The bummer for the Rams is if this wakes Ray Ray up and he ends up getting it for another team.

Yeah the comeback was great Quick is really going off this year but sloppy undisciplined play dug a massive hole

Wow very detailed, I like it! Two Qbs shown from vikes game.#14 was Hill.

Easy home recipe take 22 and divide by 7. It goes on for ever so there is plenty for everybody.

zn wrote:

Once he had one week of preparation he looked better than Hill.

Where we disagree is there. I don’t think he looked better than Hill, and if anything, Hill looked as good under far more disadvantageous conditions.

I also think Hill would have looked just as good as Davis once the advantages kicked in.

Like–a line better in sync, the WRs not making as many mistakes like play-killing penalties, and a running game. Plus of course the Vikes defense is better than the next 2 defenses the Rams played.

I do believe Hill would have looked just as good with those advantages in games 2 and 3. What I have doubts about is whether Davis would have looked as good in game 1 with those disadvantages, even with prep time with the 1s.

If nothing else that’s just experience. The more experienced Hill was good in bad circumstances.

But when you boil down his play, no, Davis did not look better to me than he did. In fact I was impressed by Hill in game 1. I said so right after the game, and that was when I still thought the INT was on HIM (later we found out he was hurt so trying to throw out of bounds on just one leg and so without the power he needed. So now I attribute the INT to the injury.)

I also think Bradford held his own under bad conditions too. His sack rate and efficiency were both good even in bad circumstances. I can only imagine how well Bradford would be playing now if he had the 2014 offense to work with.

But my challenge to everyone is still this: watch the 2nd half of the Vikes game again and see again how bad Davis was IN TERMS OF POCKET PRESENCE. Then, figure out why he improved dramatically in a week. Whatever it is, it won’t be him alone–it can’t be. Then apply those lessons to other qbs. If AD needed a lot to change to become a better pocket presence type, what does that tell us about the entire pocket presence issue.

Your doing it again ZN, minimizing preparation.Davis’ preparation is not him alone of course it’s the syncing up with the whole team. Coming in cold is a very difficult way to start and judging Davis on one half of ball when he was obviously overwhelmed is not a realistic judgment even though his numbers were better than Hill’s or Cassel’s.I think the way he came back after that experience says more about him than the cold start does. Hill has now stated he was injured before the Int.so I can’t give him a pass on that decision. I thought he did well but he did look slow to me.I don’t think anyone put the Wr penalties on Hill or Davis they got the ball there and it was caught so that is a bit of a red herring .I can see Davis improving and I sure Hill is not on that side of his career.