Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Billy_TParticipantOh, and the cook has a name, right?

Billy_TParticipantThe way they see it, I’m either totally in step with them or completely useless. I change the subject. Cooking is a good subject change topic.
Isn’t it more about a certain kind of cooking with you? Be honest, now:
Billy_TParticipantSo, i was, masked, in the big-box-grocery-store, pushing my clanky cart, looking for my corporate-food. Clanking along in the corporate-soup-aisle, searching for progresso-lentil-soup.
(I add corporate-black-bean-spicy-hummus, and corporate-hot-sauce to it)Turning the corner, I see a Vision. Plain-as-day, in a blinding-bright, blue-and-yellow jersey. A tall young man, wearing a big jersey — no.99.
Astonishment. Breathtaking.
It was like….that moment in ‘The Natural’ when Robert Redford looks into the stands and sees the shining-light-woman. Except this was in the corporate-box-store, in the corporate-soup-aisle.
I mean, this never happens in Motown, WV. This…never….happens. A human in a fucking Rams Jersey.
So, i practically levitated. I cried out, “Aaron Donald! He’s my man! Yes!”
(I dont even know what that means. It just erupted out of me.)And this ram-vision smiled at me (like Jesus) and said, “Yeah, man.”
So much more to say, of course — I closed this distance toward him — and then I saw. The mother-fucker had no mask. NO mask.
So, i turned and wheeled away.
A pandemic ram-vision. What to make of it all. I dont know.
w
v;>)
You got too close to Glenn Close.
As your neighbor to the east, I’ve run into the maskless all too often. For a bit there, I often made the mistake of getting mad and telling them to put on their freakin masks, and why. Luckily, no fisticuffs ensued. But after my many recent eye surgeries, and reading so many stories of these things escalating into shootings (and murder), I thought it best to try a different approach. Speed up my hunter-gathering efforts in said stores and exit quickly stage left.
But it still pisses me off. All the science (and common sense) tells us that if America had bought into wearing masks, the official count of deaths (165K or so) would have been a tiny fraction of what it is today. It would have been more in line with South Korea’s (300?), if not New Zealand’s (22).
Which kinda sorta forms a bridge to your comments and quotes in the other thread. As Sartre said, Hell is other people.
Billy_TParticipant“Won’t happen in a million years and it’s crazy to even talk about it! Human nature, etc. etc.!”
That’s the primary symptom of ideology at work. It identifies an immutable, universal “human nature” which, by its “nature” so to speak will allow one kind of socio-political arrangement and not others. So that the system in question is naturalized.
BTW I think that someone who is open to a Scandanavian arrangement is more that just a lib, they’re into the territory of progressive.
But not all progressives agree on everything, as we know. I tend to take things like that one cookie at a time. If someone is down with the advanced-type new FDR stuff and social democracy and things like single-payer insurance for health care, that’s a lot.
Good analysis, ZN.
To make it easier, I’ll forego my usual strictures and say it’s a male sibling. And, yes, in some ways, one could call him a “progressive.” He’s not really quite in the AOC camp, but he likes her, admires her, and I think he’s on board with some of the things she’s calling for. But on the subject of a radical change to the economic system, and/or flattening hierarchies, it’s a big fat No Way. He’s very rigid about that. Again, he seems to get angry at even the inklings of a discussion on the subject. That “human nature” stuff kicks in, and even when I hesitantly tried to remind him of all the cultures that lived communally for the vast majority of human existence (so it can’t be a matter of human nature) he kinda shuts that talk down too. Angrily.
He also mentioned that the only way we’d start fresh would be after a world-wide cataclysm. Not sure, but I think he might think I (and most socialists) want this, and I don’t. Quite the contrary. Quite the 180°, etc. I think we need to replace capitalism to avoid that world-wide cataclysm (via climate change).
The frustrating thing for me is that I’m positive he doesn’t get my views, at all, but is certain he does, and won’t let me voice more than half a sentence to clarify. I have a feeling he thinks I want everything to “go back” to ancient village life, without any “modern” innovations, and that if we got rid of capitalism and replaced it with economic democracy, that’s where we’d be.
Also, I’m not trying to get him to join me, agree with me, become a leftist. I really just want him to understand where I stand. That’s important to me. That family understand this. Based on recent conversations, however, I think that’s never going to happen, and it makes me, well, beyond sad.
Again, he’s well-educated and smart. This just seems to be a real sore spot for him, and he just won’t brook dialogue that might alter set-in-stone viewpoints.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by
Billy_T.
Billy_TParticipantThe more I think about it, it’s on me, no matter how I slice it.
Wrong to bring it up at all. Never gets anywhere. And I’m still seemingly incapable of bringing up even the preliminaries to a preliminary discussion, at least via spoken word.
I think I’m more successful writing it down, but because I’ve attempted the out loud stuff with this and other people in my life, I think the written page is now out of the question too. They’d likely just hit delete.
Oh, well. There’s always a full Rams season to look forward to, right?
Billy_TParticipant“I’m tired of this back-slappin’ “isn’t humanity neat” bullshit. We’re a virus with shoes.”
― Bill Hicks“I hate mankind, for I think myself one of the best of them, and I know how bad I am.”
― Samuel JohnsonGood quotes, as always.
E.M. Cioran was in a class by himself as a great humbug. Never liked his politics, but there were few philosophers who could match him, curmudgeon v. curmudgeon:
No one recovers from the disease of being born, a deadly wound if there ever was one.
There is no means of proving it is preferable to be than not to be.
If we could see ourselves as others see us, we would vanish on the spot.
It is not worth the bother of killing yourself, since you always kill yourself too late.
Life is possible only by the deficiencies of our imagination and memory.
If, at the limit, you can rule without crime, you cannot do so without injustices.
I feel much better now.
;>)
Billy_TParticipantWV and ZN (and various and sundry others):
To make this even more confusssing . . . and at the risk of you guys giving up on me, too, for my part in all the confusssing ;>)
This particular discussant and I were able to talk about AOC a bit, whom they said they admired . . . and that person sounded amenable to, even desirous of, the Nordic political model to some degree. And I was able to bring that up a coupla times for confirmation. Basically, they seemed to want some form of “social democracy” here, if it was doable, but were most concerned with getting Trump out, first and foremost. It was just the hint of a hint of an attempt to start up a discussion regarding the full replacement of capitalism that drove this person up the wall.
As in, something to the effect of, “So you’d be fine with America becoming Scandinavia, in a sense?”
“Yes. That’s well worth striving for.”
“How about full-on economic democracy, and an attempt to level all hierarchies?”
“Won’t happen in a million years and it’s crazy to even talk about it! Human nature, etc. etc.!”
The Jekyll/Hyde thing kicked in once I tried to push beyond standard issue Nordic stuff.
Billy_TParticipantI get that, ZN. You are probably right about “not going there,” basically.
Apologies if I misread you . . . but in this case, ironically, the discussant is one of those “liberal Dems.” Not a righty by any means. Despises them, when it comes to politics in general.
It’s just a bridge too far, for this person, if the discussion moves to replacing current system with alternatives, and even the beginnings of a hint regarding this (in the conversation) seems to bring things to an instant boil.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by
Billy_T.
Billy_TParticipantTom Nichols@RadioFreeTom
Trump explaining the danger of stock prices, saying everyone owns stocks. The amazing thing about this is that a big chunk of his base, which does not own stocks, is probably nodding along as if they do,Was thinking the same thing. Last time I checked — but haven’t rechecked this recently — the richest 1% holds more than half the stocks. And, of course, the richest three Americans hold more wealth than the bottom 50% of the country combined . . . (Bezos, Gates and Buffet until recently. I think Zuckerberg has taken Buffet’s place).
Trump’s voters likely don’t know these things — or they don’t care, cuz they’re certain they’ll be in that 1% soon enough.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by
Billy_T.
Billy_TParticipantAnother kinda strange detail: The calls to just stop all talk about these alternative systems went on for some time. Strangely enough, the conversation lasted almost three hours. The door would be slammed shut, then reopen a crack, then close again, and so on. I think that aspect may be what has kept me up the last coupla nights.
Oh, and the discussant is smart, well-educated, etc. This isn’t a matter of banging your head against the wall with someone who just won’t ever “get it” on most subjects.
I wish I could have recorded the entire thing. Overall, a bizarre and frustrating situation, and by no means am I without fault in the matter. I share plenty of it.
Billy_TParticipantHavent heard from him in too long a time.
And Fast Eddy, where’s Fast Eddy?
w
vFast Eddy? I remember him. And Team Builder too. And Ramble On. Give or take a year or two, I think I started posting on Rams boards (that made their way to the Original Herd, one way or another) back in 1995.
And it all ended cuz I spoke out about the blatant conservative bias of the mods, especially when it came to the subject of Kaepernick’s kneeling.
Wonder if things have changed there recently, now that a majority of America supports what he did.
Which leads me to this riff/sidebar:
I often think about the conservative record overall on issues, going back decades. Objectively speaking, it’s always been horrendously, dangerously, historically wrong. In no particular order: on economics, inequality, the environment, science, evolution, civil rights, voting rights, workers’ rights, education, guns, health care . . . and now, the pandemic.
Given that record, why does the media insist on grading “the right” on a curve, year after year after year? Why does it — and I’m talking about the MSM — go out of its way to try to be “balanced” when “the right” has so clearly aligned itself with the flat-earth side on every issue?
Billy_TParticipantHope Pa Ram is okay.
Also, Mac. Sending thoughts and vibes of health and good wishes to you and yours. As others mentioned, please let us know how things turn out.
Billy_TParticipantThings are starting to take shape.
Something the media has overlooked: Trump is basically telegraphing where and how he’ll steal the election — via the Postal Service. Dems and the Media have basically fallen into the trap of saying there is no proof of vote-by-mail fraud, which is true. Until now. They’re forgetting who’s in charge of the Post Office at the moment.
With Trump, pretty much every tweet, every interview, every press conference is a confession or a projection. When he says this or that is rigged, he’s confessing.
(I knew this would be a problem as soon as Trump installed one of his donors as head of the Postal Service):
Have you heard more about this, WV? Your senator is raising alarm bells.
Billy_TParticipantReally good video. I agreed with all of it.
Good point about the (lame-assed) attempt at plausible deniability. It’s quite similar to how he ended his calls to ban all Muslims — which was straight out of Hitler’s playbook. To paraphrase, “Until we can figure out what the hell is going on here!”
Again, until Trump decides when, where, how, etc. etc.
Yep. He’s a fascist. And he’s quite literally pitting Americans against each other, in a new civil war . . . in the middle of a pandemic which he’s completely botched.
Oh, and the 2nd Quarter GDP contracted by 33%.
In my view, no sane person with a working moral compass could possibly vote for him. Of course, I thought that in 2016 as well.
Billy_TParticipantWritten by the author of The Evolution of God, which I also loved, it’s basically a very intelligent pitch for a kind of secular Buddhism, with mindfulness meditation at its heart. Wright is an evolutionary psychologist, and gets scienzy (at times) in the service of the Buddhist Way, showing how it fits with natural selection, and can offset the “environmental mismatches” our evolution has created. Where it becomes relevant to the above discussion is via psychological studies regarding how easily we humans are led, misled, our opinions (re)shaped, altered, via (at times) very simple suggestions. And that’s all of us. We all are subject to this, to conditioned responses, etc.
(Wright asserts that strong meditation practices can help us break free of that conditioning to one degree or another).
Capitalist marketing weaponized/weaponizes all of the above to a degree we’ve never seen before, and the right does capitalist marketing far, far better than the left. It’s not even close.
But we’re all “naturally” susceptible to this, for these illusions and delusions, cuz they once helped us stay alive/spread our genes into the next generation. Passing on our genes is our Prime Directive, as biological units. Wright contends that the secular Buddhist Way can help us get beyond that Prime Directive, rebel against it if need be, and it often is needed, given those increasing environmental mismatches.
=================
Well i basically agree with all that.
Cept i would qualify it with somethin along the lines of…I suspect that once Corporate-Capitalism has damaged a human brain so utterly that it has, say, turned them into a Neo-Nazi, or NeoCon or whatever– I am not sure any form of ‘meditation’ could save them. Ya know. Too much capitalist-damage at that point. They might just meditate and become even more focused assholes.
I just dont believe everyone can always come back to the light. Take, Zooey for example…
w
vThat makes sense. But Wright doesn’t really get into the politics stuff, per se, beyond talking about our increasing tribalism and how this is gonna get us all killed, one way or another, if we don’t wake up. Climate change, wars, etc. But it’s not his main angle in the book, and, unless I already forgot the section, which is more than possible, he doesn’t talk about meditation “saving” the already lost. I’m pretty sure his take is preventative, rather than post-darkside coversion.
I think you’d like it, WV. And he’s really pretty humble about the whole thing. I think his meditation sessions and retreats must have had that effect. A really different “tone” to the book than The Evolution of God.
. . .
Haven’t looked at any of the videos here, but he mentioned this site in the book:
Billy_TParticipantCal,
The key word in your response is “some.”
Polling for 2020, for instance, both nationally and per-state, has a range. Florida is a great example. I’ve seen Biden’s lead there, anywhere from three to twelve . . . and that’s in the same week of polling. It’s always been a range.
So the range of polling in 2016, as is the case every election, ran the gamut from nearly spot on to way off base. But in the aggregate? It was just fine in 2016.
As for more people voting for Trump than previous Republicans. That wasn’t the case nationally — he received just 26% of the electorate — even though it should be, given increases in population. When a politician brags about record vote totals, it’s usually nonsense, because it should be a record each and every new election. It’s a bad sign when the numbers go down, as they did overall in 2016, as a percent of the population. Roughly 105 million potential voters stayed home.
Again, Trump only received 26% of the total electorate’s vote. That sucks. Of course, Clinton’s tally was terrible as well, at roughly 28%.
Also, according to Greg Palast’s research, the voter purges in key swing states exceeded the margin of Trump’s victory. Throw in the rampant closing of polling places in likely Dem strongholds and the pre-election polling was actually too generous to Trump.
Billy_TParticipantJust remembered this study from the book:
Wine experts were given different wines to taste and rate, or so they thought. They had different price tags. Ninety dollar bottles and ten dollar bottles. Guess which ones they thought were better.
It was the same exact wine.
If people can be manipulated by something that simple, of course they can be manipulated into believing conspiracy theories, especially by demagogues who know how to push all the right buttons.
Billy_TParticipantQuick examples of those mismatches:
Our love of sugar once did us a service, from a bio/nutritional pov. Pretty much the only sugary stuff back in the day were fruits. Good for us. Today? Sugary donuts — Wright’s example — aren’t.
We evolved away from so many of that kind of thing, and often in a way that’s quite harmful to us. So illusion and delusion expands pretty much unchecked.
He also uses the example of road rage. Way back when, it made sense in our Hunter-gatherer villages to get pissed off and show it, if our fellow villagers tried to take advantage of us. We’d see them pretty much every day, so if you let them get away with this or that, things would likely get worse. But screaming and going after people on the highway that you’ll never, ever see again, evah, serves no biological purpose, and might get us kilt in the process.
etc. etc.
Billy_TParticipantI dunno. But i think about the ‘why’ of ‘it’ ALL the fucking time. I dont see a lot of good articles on the ‘why’. The articles are usually mainstream neoliberal smear-job articles. They always end up saying “whats wrong with these crazy people” instead of “whats wrong with the system that lied to people so much and for so long, that the people went crazy.”
w
vI just finished reading an excellent book which may not seem relevant to this topic, but it is:

Written by the author of The Evolution of God, which I also loved, it’s basically a very intelligent pitch for a kind of secular Buddhism, with mindfulness meditation at its heart. Wright is an evolutionary psychologist, and gets scienzy (at times) in the service of the Buddhist Way, showing how it fits with natural selection, and can offset the “environmental mismatches” our evolution has created. Where it becomes relevant to the above discussion is via psychological studies regarding how easily we humans are led, misled, our opinions (re)shaped, altered, via (at times) very simple suggestions. And that’s all of us. We all are subject to this, to conditioned responses, etc.
(Wright asserts that strong meditation practices can help us break free of that conditioning to one degree or another).
Capitalist marketing weaponized/weaponizes all of the above to a degree we’ve never seen before, and the right does capitalist marketing far, far better than the left. It’s not even close.
But we’re all “naturally” susceptible to this, for these illusions and delusions, cuz they once helped us stay alive/spread our genes into the next generation. Passing on our genes is our Prime Directive, as biological units. Wright contends that the secular Buddhist Way can help us get beyond that Prime Directive, rebel against it if need be, and it often is needed, given those increasing environmental mismatches.
Billy_TParticipantIMO,
There is no way on earth Trump can win this election, if the election is even relatively fair. The “riots” he’s creating won’t help him. Nothing will. He has no chance whatsoever, if he doesn’t cheat, and he will cheat. The question is how far he goes. Rather, how far his enablers help him to go, cuz we’ve all seen he has no “bottom.” We’ve all seen there is nothing he won’t do to retain power. Nothing.
In my view, we don’t have to worry about “the riots” helping Trump. We have to worry about Martial Law, Trump’s control of the Post Office system, his use of armed thugs to shut down polling places, the whole nine yards. Again, he has no bottom. He’s a sociopath, the worst America has seen since Andrew Jackson.
Billy_TParticipantExit polls in 2016 all but confirmed the polling prior to those polls. I wish the media would stop saying that the polling was all wrong four years ago. It wasn’t. It was basically just fine. It fairly accurately predicted the Clinton victory that actually happened in the popular vote, and the Clinton victory that actually happened in the swing states, if not for the massive voter purging there — see Greg Palast.
If the US were not the hegemon, if it were some “third world” nation instead, our elections would have been monitored internationally and confirmed as “rigged” by the GOP and Trump. No question about that, in my view. And he and they are doing it again for 2020, but on a much, much larger (and more violent) scale, given Trump’s power now.
Of course, Republican Comey, dropping the (bogus) announcement, with 10 days to go, that Clinton was under (bogus) investigation again — for emails!! — hurt the accuracy of the polling a bit . . . but she still should have won even the EC.
(Of course, he never told Americans that Trump was also under investigation. Logically, if he had, the 11th hour announcement about Clinton would have been pretty much a wash).
I can’t stand the Clintons, but I think it’s abundantly clear that if she had won, instead of Trump, we would have done most of the right things to get control of Covid-19, and our death-count would have been a few thousand, rather than 152,000 and counting. For that alone, it would have been worth electing a “corporatist Dem” over the monster Trump.
Billy_TParticipant
Well, if I had a twitter account, I’d likely respond to that with this:
The difference between some leftists and other leftists is that other leftists tend, but, you know, who knows, maybe, maybe not, don’t try to speak for all leftists, and some leftists do.
;>)
So, speaking for myself, I’d say Trump definitely doesn’t “represent America,” and it’s dangerous to believe he does. Dangerously cynical, jaded, dismissively above it all and bordering on the blind.
He actually, in my view, represents a very small minority of Americans, with a majority of that support coming from diehard Republicans, who would be diehard supporters if the Republicans ran a ham sandwich. I think the actual support for Trump qua Trump is very, very thin and getting thinner by the day.
Remember, Trump only received 26% of the electorate’s vote in 2016, and that’s roughly the percentage of Republicans in America.
So, again, speaking for myself as a leftist, I’d say, yeah, we definitely need to “change America,” root, branch and tree, but we gotta change presidents too. Both/And. Not either/or.
IMO, any leftist who thinks getting rid of Trump is irrelevant . . . um, well, perhaps when Trump snatches and grabs them off the street, while all but saying “death to the radical left,” they might have second thoughts.
July 22, 2020 at 4:46 pm in reply to: For those contemplating sitting out November elections #118263
Billy_TParticipantYeah…there is literally nothing to stop the boogaloo boys and all the neo-nazis from just going into protests and throwing people into vans and driving off. We’ve seen pretty clearly this summer that the actual cops are totally down with white supremacists. What would stop them from doing this?
This worries me too.
Clint Watts, a former FBI agent, said the same thing. He also mentioned how we’ve known for a long, long time that the vast majority of “domestic terrorism” comes from right-wing militias, et al, Nearly 99% of it. There is zero evidence that “antifa” has ever committed any of it.
But the current administration has done nothing about the far right. Has in fact stoked it for political gain. Is stoking it now, as we speak. And their supposed rationale for sending in federal jack boots is to put down “the radical left.”
That’s going to be the theme song Election Day, too. And beyond. Whether or not Trump loses, he’s gonna keep this stuff going. Our sociopath in chief wants blood on the streets so he can avoid jail himself — or so he likely believes. He wants to create this violence, so the right-wing echo chamber will televise it, lie about it, scream to the heavens about it. And if they don’t get the footage they want, they’ll just use old footage from elsewhere, like the Ukraine (2014), which they’re currently doing on FB.
Folks, we’re in truly dark times, and “the left” needs to focus entirely, IMO, on legally, non-violently destroying Trump, all of his enablers and the entire right. No mercy. No prisoners. Non-violently, legally.
July 11, 2020 at 12:56 pm in reply to: updated–Round Three? Robinson’s rebuttal to the rebuttal to the . . . #117865
Billy_TParticipantAm in the middle of a good book on the Inquisition, God’s Jury, by Cullen Murphy.

Follow its story and you’re following “the right.” Same as it ever was.
____
If I can be GM of “the left” for a moment, this is what I’d do:
Oppose the entire right, without exception, with the highest sense of urgency, courage and intensity. Do whatever we can, legally, non-violently, to unseat them from all levers of power. Do that first. Then go after “the center.”
To me, it’s a huge mistake to attack “the center” first, and it’s absolutely insane, IMO, to seek some coalition with the right to make those attacks. This only strengthens the right, and they’re never going to share power. Not gonna happen.
Legally, non-violently wipe out the right, and we transform “the center” into the new conservatives. Then we focus our opposition on them. That’s what I’d do if I were the leftist Les Snead.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 4 months ago by
Billy_T.
July 11, 2020 at 12:48 pm in reply to: updated–Round Three? Robinson’s rebuttal to the rebuttal to the . . . #117863
Billy_TParticipantPopulist Right article.
—
“New Right” Leaders Are Co-opting Progressive Language to Mislead VotersGood article, WV.
To beat a dead horse, I’m just baffled that any lefty pundit ever fell for this bullshit. How many times does Lucy have to pull the football away from Charlie Brown before folks learn?
The right has rebranded itself a thousand times through the centuries, and its core beliefs, agenda, methods, goals stay intact. It has to rebrand, cuz folks eventually wake up to its odious con. Then it puts on new clothes, gaslights the populace again, is eventually found out, and rebrands again.
Its ferocious opposition to egalitarian, democratic societies never changes. A tad bit around the edges? Yeah. New clothes for the wolves? Yeah. But nothing important is ever altered, and it mostly just gets worse.
Words are wind. Deeds are what matter. The right can’t point to any deeds, ever, not evah, that have improved quality of life for the masses. Quite the opposite. And they’re actually aggressively proud to be anti-science, anti-environment, anti-democracy, etc. etc.
Groundhog day. We need to stop this shit.
Billy_TParticipantI haven’t followed the Taibbi bruhaha, and so I’m not confident I have a clear understanding of what it’s about.
I will say that I follow Taibbi on Twitter, and more than have the tweets that appear on my feed are Taibbi fighting with nobodies who criticize him. I think he’s fallen into the Twitter maelstrom of hostility, people he should ignore. I do wonder if that has colored his views on “the left.”
And I see Robinson doing the same thing. They are both responding to personal criticism and spending a lot of energy fighting idiots they would be better off not engaging.
Agree about showing restraint on Twitter and picking your battles, etc. etc.
If you’re interested in the back and forth between Robinson, Taibbi and The Rising, there are a few threads on it here. Robinson has several articles on his site about it — you may have seen — which reference the relevant material from Taibbi and The Rising, etc.
Just my take: I wish “the left” would learn that these attempts “to be fair” are never reciprocated, and, as Robinson shows, they tend to be full of jumping the gun in the first place. They just help “the right” scream louder, claim vindication, and goddess knows what else.
Trump’s been ramping up this war for some time now, and I think it’s already caused deaths, directly, at the protests and elsewhere. The numbers for indirect damage are incalculable.
We’re in the Twilight Zone times 10.
Billy_TParticipantWV,
Good quotes from Robinson. Have been hoping my local library would carry his book, but no luck so far.
Seems to be a big difference in choices between Libby and Hoopla apps.
Anyway . . . yeah, I gave Zooey a H/T when he posted Robinson here. Didn’t know about him until then. Youze guys have done that many a time. Pretty good for a bunch of Seahawk fans!
;>)
Billy_TParticipantI should have formatted the excerpt. Should have put Trump’s quote in a, well, a quote box.
Best read on the website anyway. Robinson’s really good about sourcing and linking to this or that claim/clounter-claim, etc.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 4 months ago by
Billy_T.
Billy_TParticipantThis is why “Social Distancing” is never enough, especially inside. But outside too — to a lesser degree. Airborne transmission means if you keep your distance from others, but you’re moving through a room, and folks aren’t wearing masks, the virus is there, in the air folks walk through. Some of them will become infected.
Even outside, there’s a danger, though it’s reduced. But if you’re, say, walking along a path, and someone is coming the other way, and no one is wearing a mask? You both pass into each other’s aerosols, etc. etc.
Social distancing alone won’t cut it.
Billy_TParticipantIMO, too many lefty pundits let the right frame the issues for us. They aid and abet the right (and Trump) in the process and they need to stop it. The right is the real enemy. Always has been. Always will be. And when they start lining people up against the wall, metaphorically or literally, they’re not going to separate the Taibbis, Greenwalds, Mates, et al, from the Robinsons. They’re not going to give them bonus points for echoing right-wing talking points. They’re gonna shoot us all, metaphorically or literally.
In my view, certain public figures on the left let the right, especially in the person of Trump, frame “Russiagate,” and then “Ukrainegate” — the mere existence of which should have made them do a mea culpa for their Russiagate views, but, hmm. Didn’t happen. They let the right frame the “Deep State” issue, which propped up (and still props up) the above. And now there seems to be a move afoot by some on the left to let the right frame the “Social Justice Warriors/PC run amok” debate too.
Again, they need to stop it.
As a general rule of thumb, if the right takes a certain stance, it’s safe to assume it’s the wrong stance, the cruel and heartless stance. Act accordingly. Dig deep, and act accordingly.
First rule of Ideological Fight Club:
1. Never, ever help the right — directly or indirectly.
-
This reply was modified 6 years, 3 months ago by
-
AuthorPosts

