Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Billy_TParticipant
I really like the way Mayfield has handled himself with the Rams — so far. But as others have mentioned, he doesn’t have a history of maintaining that. The Rams, I’m guessing, need the “team-first” mentality more than most, or they won’t win consistently. It may be among the most important aspects of their team-building model, and gives them a competitive edge when their overall roster talent would suggest they can’t.
As in, they have a core of very talented athletes, but they’ve elected to surround that core with what amounts to journey-men types. Cap issues and lack of draft capital being the main culprits, but it may also be a “choice” in many cases. The team-first concept may or may not lift those (non-core) guys well above that type, but without it they’re JAGs. For example, I don’t think Hoecht gets a chance to play, much less play so well, with another team. The O-line has some guys like that too.
So, in one sense, Mayfield really fits that model. Cuz he’s a pretty tough QB, like Stafford, and, as WV mentions, can be a good locker room guy. “One of the dudes,” kinda QB. But that doesn’t seem to last long, and then he starts to freelance in public, etc.
Regardless, the Rams are going to need to find a couple of solid backups, cuz the trend in the NFL is for more injuries, at more positions, at a more severe level, so they just can’t count on Stafford playing most games. That’s not to mention his age, or his history of being battered. That’s just a given for every team now. Where is the Ram’s Brock Purdy, for instance?
December 29, 2022 at 11:28 am in reply to: Around the league, going into week 17 & aftermath #142366Billy_TParticipantThe Rams, like every other team in the NFL, had a shot at Tariq Woolen into the 5th round. Yes, he does have ultra-rare closing speed. As in, a 4.26 forty. And, perhaps even more remarkable for someone a shade over 6’4″, a 1.47 10-yard split. Plus NBA-level hops, etc.
Also not sure why he gets compared with Richard Sherman so often, on size/speed grounds, cuz Sherman wasn’t as tall or as fast. An excellent player, but not as big or as athletic as Woolen. Woolen is basically a unicorn.
Love Lazard’s reaction to his own crazy play, and the play itself. He must have watched Woods and Kupp block.
;>)
Billy_TParticipantIf I were putting together an NFL team right now, with an eye toward the present and future, Herbert would be my first choice for franchise QB. Yeah, even before Mahomes, Burrow, Fields, or Jackson. No one else in the league has his combo of physical potential, size, athleticism, arm strength, and smarts. If you could build the perfect QB in a lab, it would be something like this:
Height Weight Arm length Hand span 40-yard dash 10-yard split 20-yard split 20-yard shuttle Three-cone drill Vertical jump Broad jump Wonderlic:
6 ft 6+1⁄4 in
(1.99 m) 236 lb
(107 kg) 32+7⁄8 in
(0.84 m) 10 in
(0.25 m) 4.68 s 1.62 s 2.75 s 4.46 s 7.06 s 36.0 in(0.91 m) 10 ft 3 in (3.12 m)
39
All values from NFL Combine[47][48]He’s just 24.
Seems like the Chargers may be blowing a once in a generation chance. They’re not maximizing what they drafted, at least to this early point in his career. They have not given him the weapons he needs, etc. I’d bet McVay, OTOH, would win several Super Bowls with Herbert at the helm.
Billy_TParticipantZN,
Good points too. Though I thought McCutcheon played yesterday . . . ?
What’s your take on the Rams at least trying to keep Mayfield? I know the odds are against it, both from a salary cap and personal goals POV. Mayfield is said to really want to start, and he knows that won’t be in LA, at least as long as Stafford is there. So he’s gonna want to go where he can start. But he looks really solid with this offense, even with it being decimated, and the Rams have invested too little in the backup spot. Wolford and Perkins do not look like starting-caliber QBs at this moment in time. They need someone as good as BMayfield . . .
Billy_TParticipantCanada,
Good points. I thought much the same. Both tight ends looked really good, and they battled for extra yards as well — always a good sign.
Watching on TV, I’m guessing we often can’t see how much of it is the lack of receivers getting open, doing what they need to do to get open, or other factors. Does this or that receiver look relatively bad because of their own failures, or is it just a lack of inclusion in the offense? Scheme, play-calling, QB-play, O-line, or the receivers themselves failing to get separation, etc. A mixture of all the above, and so on.
Throw in, as you mentioned, players like Kupp who get most of the targets, and there’s just not enough footballs to go around.
Going on the eyeball test alone, though, if Hopkins, for instance, can produce against a pretty good Denver D, it makes sense that he can do it in most cases. That tells me he’s been underutilized, and I’ve always thought Higbee was a solid TE.
Next season, it might be a good idea to diversify the scheme, become more inclusive. I’d also like to see the Rams implement quick, short passes more often, if for no other reason than to protect Stafford. It may not be pretty, but you can dink and dunk your way down the field for seven. Other teams do. A score’s a score, etc.
Billy_TParticipantWhere was this team all year? Akers ran with confidence, serious drive, and force. He looked great. So did, shockingly, the O-line. They often opened huge holes for the backs, and protected Baker, who looked excellent too. Made me think the Rams need to re-sign him. But I’m guessing he will decline so he can start somewhere else. Baker as a backup, though, would be seriously good for the Rams in 2023. They haven’t had a top shelf backup since . . . Foles? At the very least, it would allow them to increase compensation via a trade during the 2023 season, which might help Baker too. He might find a better situation during the season, after team injuries, than he would this off-season.
Regardless, it was a lot of fun to watch the Rams hitting on all cylinders. Offense, defense, special teams, generating turnovers, sacks, extra effort, etc. Players across the board were playing with passion and a ton of want-to. And I think they may have found a nice addition to the D-line rotation in Murchison. Seems to kinda fit the scouting report I read, which basically says he’s a limited athlete with a lot of play-hard in him. Guessing he’s a better athlete than initially credited, and has even more want-to than they thought. Short, squat, quick, and tough. Could really help give Donald a rest, and Donald could coach him up. He’ll be 26 next season, so he’s just coming into his prime.
Anyway, part of me, going into that game, just wanted the Rams to tank so they could get better draft picks. But another part of me thought they needed to end on high notes to build for 2023, morale-wise, etc. This game was a boost in that direction, obviously. May end up being far more important than a shift in draft spots, give or take. It’s also possible . . . though perhaps remotely . . . that if the Rams play terrible football from here on out, they risk losing McVay and/or Donald to retirement. This win may diminish that possibility.
Billy_TParticipantHang in there, ZN.
Best wishes.
Billy_TParticipantI was going to post the Raheem Morris article for a new thread, and then comment, but since it’s already here . . . .
From the article:
“As you guys have seen, Mike Hoecht the last couple of weeks getting acclimated to that position, we’ve been able to see Keir Thomas get activated and then last week our young rook came back up off the injury stuff and was able to play for us. Probably this week, (Lewis) wouldn’t have been active and what Sean says, he really means. He’s people first so in order to give Terrell the best chance to get back on the grass, we decided to part ways and let him move on and have an opportunity somewhere else where it’s probably going to be more fruitful for him. These young guys are coming in and playing, they’ve done some really good things the last couple of weeks and in order not to have a disgruntled worker, Sean really means what he says and people first, decided to let him go, give him an opportunity to play somewhere else and move on.”
IMO, it’s completely nutz to cut players outright, just to give them a shot to catch on somewhere else. That’s taking being “people first” way too far. Trade them, certainly, if it’s not working out. Do whatever you can to get something in return, even if it’s just a late rounder. But you can’t build a team if you keep cutting most of your draft picks for nada. Not only is it a sign that you’ve drafted poorly; it’s also terrible asset management.
I’m all for treating players with respect, kindness, and dignity. That’s the least they can do. But if you want to build and sustain a winner, you simply can’t give away players for nothing. Treat them with respect and try to maximize their value via compensation. It’s not an either/or deal.
Billy_TParticipantI still think the Rams gave up way too much for Stafford. And, yeah, I know: Super Bowl victory last year. IMO, though, the Rams could have won it last year with Goff, too, if McVay had been demonstrative in his support and faith there. Goff helped take the Rams to the Super Bowl in 2019, and I think he wins it if Kupp had played. He’s playing really well this year with the Lions. As mentioned above, it’s a confidence thing, etc.
Also: I see that trade as more than just Goff and future draft picks for Stafford. They also basically traded the picks needed to move up to get Goff in the first place. Plus, Stafford is six years older, and has taken a vicious pounding during his career. I love his toughness, and his chutzpah, but I just don’t see the difference between the two QBs as warranting that trade. Stafford has a bit more arm talent. But I think the age difference cancels that out.
If it’s me, I don’t make the trade. I support Goff, coach him up. Make sure he has the best QB coach possible, and build up the O-line too. He wins it all with a healthy Kupp.
Water under the bridge, of course.
Billy_TParticipantLoved the game. Mayfield was a great pickup, and I loved his hutzpah. Excellent plays from Skro, Gaines, Akers, Scott, and Tutu.
Probably missing some names. But that was a lot of fun to watch
Excellent pick-up for the Rams, to get Baker. Can’t lose with it. Keep him, re-sign him, or let him go and get a nice comp pick. At the very least, audition him for the rest of the league. Keep him if he plays really well. Mayfield is soooo much better than Wolford or Perkins. Lotsa good press from football players regarding his quality as a teammate. He seems like an inspirational player.
Smart move by the Rams. Great win. Loved watching this one.
Billy_TParticipantMcVay said he’ll retire too if that core three leave. After getting whacked in the head, it may only take two. It would not surprise me if the two you mention do decide to leave, Nittany, and that may be enough for McVay too. It must be damn frustrating for him along another front as well. He keeps losing coaches and scouts. I don’t keep tabs on the rest of the league all that much, so I’m not positive about this. But I’d bet no team has lost more coaches in the last few years than the Rams.
If Donald and Stafford go, that may be the last straw, and then the Rams will have to rebuild. Not sure how the cap works with players who retire, but the Rams seem to be the kind of team that won’t ask for their core guys to refund monies, though I think they legally can. So the Rams are likely to be in Cap hell and lack draft picks too. The Super Bowl win is so hard to achieve, it’s easy to say “it was all worth it,” and I agree. But I think they could have had their cake and eat it too. They could have managed player retainment, drafting, trades, and the cap better . . . . win the whole enchilada and remain competitive. It’s doable. Other teams have done it, etc.
Billy_TParticipantSome positives for me: Hoecht hustles. He’s a pretty good athlete for his size, though he needs to get a lot stronger to play well along the D-line. I saw him numerous times downfield, trying to make a play. No quit, and he’s good on ST too. Arcuri seemed to play well for his first start, though not perfect. The o-line was overmatched, of course, going against the first team KC defense. The Rams are essentially playing their exhibition season team, and they showed No Quit as well.
Perkins is obviously good as a runner. He needs some serious help, though, with his passing. Puts waaay too much air under his throws, and that’s a pic waiting to happen. He showed more zip in college, if memory serves, so I think he can throw the ball hard. But there may have been changes since then, so I’m not sure. It’s another positive that the team seems to like him and want to do well while he’s on the field.
I think the Rams need to try to trade Floyd in the offseason, but if they can’t, find the ideal time to let him go for cap savings and a comp pick. I’d like to see them keep Scott at safety, but I’m guessing they won’t. If they do move on, I think they should at least cross-train Kendrick for safety. He seems to be a willing tackler, and aggressive, but lacks the speed to play corner, IMO. Safety may be better for him. Which leads me to a more radical idea: Ramsey should play safety as well, but that would depend on the Rams upgrading their corner spots. Free agency is the most likely route there. If they can field two good corners, move Ramsey to safety. The flipside is obvious: major upgrades at safety would mean Ramsey stays put.
(They never should have let Johnson go)
Even with the loss, I’m glad I watched the game. That hasn’t changed for me since 1966.
Billy_TParticipantI think the NFL is owned and run by some very stupid people. They shell out mountains of cash for players who inevitably get hurt, often seriously, too often losing them for the year. Even if we leave out the dire moral and ethical implications, it’s just moronic to keep doing this without addressing the environment that causes those injuries — bad turf, too many games, not enough time between them, and rules that fail to protect the players.
Endless greed. Sociopaths in charge of it all.
The Rams aren’t just in a period of insanely bad luck. These injuries can be prevented, in some cases, and at least radically reduced overall. The league created golden geese and don’t seem to give a damn about caring for them.
Billy_TParticipantFor comparison sake, thought I’d list Christian Watson’s metrics. Of course, the usual caveats: No pads, relatively ideal conditions, etc. How these guys play on Sundays is what counts, not their Combine or Pro Day stats.
But it’s at least a rough picture of potential athleticism. A blueprint of sorts:
6 ft 4+1⁄8 in
(1.93 m) 208 lb
(94 kg) 32+1⁄2 in
(0.83 m) 10+1⁄8 in
(0.26 m) 4.36 s 1.45 s 2.45 s 4.19 s 6.96 s 38.5 in
(0.98 m) 11 ft 4 in
(3.45 m) 18 repsAgain, I want the Rams to get faster, quicker, bigger, more athletic, across the board, with guys who can maximize that on Game Day.
Billy_TParticipantHenderson is the Rams’ best runner, easily, IMO, and Hollins is a solid starter and good athlete for his size. Green Bay already grabbed Hollins off the waiver wire.
To me, these are inexplicable moves. They get nada for them. Unless I’m mistaken, the in-season release negates any chance for comp picks. It’s baffling, and the folks covering the team seem baffled too.
Are they really so loaded in the running back and linebacker rooms that they can afford to do this? Doesn’t appear so. They may be high on Williams, but he hasn’t proven a thing yet, and Hendo has. Henderson is also bigger, faster, quicker. Williams is pretty slow for a small back, at least on paper. Doesn’t have quicks, either. Note his ten-yard split and 3-cone.
5ft 9+1⁄4 in
(1.76 m) 194 lb
(88 kg) 28+5⁄8 in
(0.73 m) 9 in
(0.23 m) 4.65 s 1.57 s 2.69 s 4.33 s 7.07 s 32.0 in
(0.81 m) 9 ft 8 in
(2.95 m)Hoping he has the proverbial playing speed, etc.
McVay and company get a ton of slack due to last year. Can’t take that away from them or we fans. But they seem determined to stretch that slack to the limit.
- This reply was modified 2 years, 1 month ago by Billy_T.
Billy_TParticipantJust saw a few highlights, but the bomb to Tutu was nearly perfect. A great, great throw and catch, and the line, at least on that play, gave Stafford plenty of time. He led the speedster with precision, Warner-like.
Tutu is possibly a smaller, faster version of Tavon Austin, but he still worries me out there. If they can keep him clean, in space, he can do some damage. But I also think they need to work with him on ball security. Teams will likely go after him with extra hard hits to strip the ball, etc.
Anyway . . . . the freakish injuries keep happening. How much of this is due to turf? I’d bet most of it. The Rams need to change SoFi to grass, as does every team.
Billy_TParticipantWV,
Again, agree with your take.
Billy_TParticipantI think we may see team needs differently, and what a “rebuild” would entail. I know the injuries along the O-line have been crazy, extreme, once in a decade, etc. But I don’t think it was a good line going into the season. They’ve neglected it for too long, IMO, relying too much on late-rounders and UDFAs.
I doubt they’ll end up doing this, but I wish they’d at least try to trade for picks, with the caveat of saying No, if the current Rams player has more value staying than leaving for X amount . . . as was the case with Woods, for example. Candidates would be Floyd, Noteboom, Rapp, ARob, and Akers. I’d float trial balloons for Higbee, too, and any of the late rounders of recent years who lack athleticism, but may be attractive to other teams. In short, I want the Rams to get faster, twitchier, bigger, more athletic. I think the draft is the most cost-effective route, too. Rookie contracts almost always help the cap.
Just tossing stuff around. The Rams have their own plans, and they’ll obviously do things their own way.
Billy_TParticipantThe issue of too many injuries is a given. But the Rams weren’t playing well from Game One. They weren’t playing well even before the rash of injuries. Looked flat. Out of sync, and all the usual cliches.
And a rash of injuries doesn’t hurt a team (as much) if they have a good bench. The Rams don’t. They’ve drafted poorly for several years, and have been without a first rounder since 2016. The roster is very thin, except at the top. “Next UDFA up” can only work so long, and will fall apart once a team hits a threshold for those injuries. The Rams have.
Also: you can “rebuild” without getting rid of the core. The Rams’ current team-building strategy is basically in a constant mini-rebuild anyway, around that core. I’m saying they need to change up a bit and trade for draft picks instead of vets, and surround that core with those draftees instead. Sign FAs when possible too, preferably ascending FAs. Stop shipping their picks for those vets, especially for rentals.
Shutting things down (in part) this season helps them do the above, and lets Stafford heal for next season. I’m betting he’s playing hurt, and not just the concussions. He’s never been the kind of player who lets people know.
Just my two cents, etc.
Billy_TParticipantWV,
I agree with you. Shut it down. Start Perkins. Let Stafford heal up. Play the rookies and youngins, though I’d play Floyd on passing downs. He should be auditioning for trade possibilities.
Start Jacob Harris, Tutu, McCutcheon. Lotsa targets for Robinson, cuz they should audition him as well for a trade. Sit Higbee. I’d love to see them use Hoecht at FB and blocking TE too. Basically, a lineup like they might have during the exhibition season.
Chalk this season up to ye old Super Bowl hangover, and get ready for 2023.
They’ll be good — maybe great — with some solid drafting and FE work. At least if Donald and McVay come back.
Billy_TParticipantMy criticism may seem too harsh, given last year. It also may sound “angry.” I’m not, at all. I’ve already resigned myself to the Rams missing the playoffs and likely failing to break .500, which is my prediction. I’m okay with all of that. I was almost there after last week; after this Sunday, I’m there.
Last year’s win carries more than enough for me to carry me through. I’d just like them to course-correct for the future, and I think they need to do that now.
Following up on my pre-game hopes, I definitely want them to do this now, especially with Kupp probably missing some games, too:
Shut down Stafford for the season, start Perkins (not Wolford) for the rest of the way, and find a path to increase their draft capital for next season and beyond. Think in terms of a rebuild. As others have mentioned, it’s quite possible that Donald will retire, and that might provoke others into similar decisions, including McVay.
We Rams fans may be in for a rough ride in the future, but we’ll always have Paris, I mean XXXIV and LVI
Billy_TParticipantThe Draft, of course, is a crap shoot. That said, the best chances to win at craps start with the first round and decrease after that. Obviously, you just have fewer and fewer shots at great players as the Draft goes on, and you also lose the ability to trade down for more good shots.
The Rams strategy can work if they hit on all of their late picks, and the guys they trade for (like Ramsey) live up to their rep. But if they end up with a lot of rentals, and relative failures (Watkins, for instance), it’s not going to work. If they don’t hit on their picks, their roster will be extremely thin, so they won’t be able to handle injuries. They haven’t hit on their picks, with a few exceptions. Turf Show Times has done some recent breakdowns of their drafts, and they’ve really been abysmal in the last few years.
Another issue: The Rams have let too many players go who could have helped them this year. Corbett and Blythe, for instance. I also think keeping SBD would have been a huge help on defense this year. The Rams let too many ascending players go, and rely far too much on the “next UDFA up” approach.
For those who say they didn’t have the money to keep these guys: they’ve been far too quick to extend a few core players, and that makes re-signing those ascending players, and the guys they trade for, next to impossible.
In short, I think the Rams have defeated the Rams this year, but the process started a few years ago.
Billy_TParticipantI wish the Rams would start Perkins today, or at least bring him in once the Rams get near the goal line. Run RPO, etc.
Wolford will get the nod, and if he loses the game, I’m leaning toward shutting down Stafford for the year, and starting Perkins for the rest of the way.
My guess is also that Rams fans are very thankful I don’t get to decide such things.
;>)
November 7, 2022 at 5:32 pm in reply to: Defensive Coordinator? Offense? Both? What’s the problem? #141566Billy_TParticipantI think Morris is doing a fine job, given the limitations of his personnel, and he’s likely to go elsewhere on his own, anyway. If the Rams continue to impress on D, he will be in the thick of things for HC consideration next season.
The O is the problem, not the D, in my view as well. Though I think the D could go from Top Five to Best in the League if they can find faster, more athletic and twitchy players to surround Donald and Ramsey. That’s been a weakness in their strategy in recent years, though I think bringing Hill back helps counter that trend a bit. They still need more athleticism, especially at edge and DB. Can’t play tight effectively without finding size/speed guys, the freakier the better. If you were to create that player in a lab, you’d probably come up with players like Seattle’s Tariq Woolen:
6 ft 4+1⁄8 in
(1.93 m) 205 lb
(93 kg) 33+5⁄8 in
(0.85 m) 9+1⁄8 in
(0.23 m) 4.26 s 1.47 s 2.49 s 4.30 s 7.10 s 42.0 in
(1.07 m) 10 ft 11 in
(3.33 m) 12 repsOr Zyon McCollum of the Bucs:
6 ft 2+1⁄8 in
(1.88 m) 199 lb
(90 kg) 30+3⁄4 in
(0.78 m) 9 in
(0.23 m) 4.33 s 1.46 s 2.51 s 3.94 s 6.48 s 39.5 in
(1.00 m) 11 ft 0 in
(3.35 m) 15 repsAnyway . . . to me, it’s not Morris. The Rams are in the midst of an offensive collapse.
Billy_TParticipantObviously, a tough loss. The offense is awful. Perhaps the worst it’s been since pre-GSOT days. Bad line, with, IMO, Evans being the main problem, and a much too predictable play-calling scheme. I don’t think Stafford is sharp, though he has his moments. It’s pretty much the Kupp show, and you can’t beat good teams with one guy.
On D, the soft coverage isn’t working, but the Rams don’t have the athletes to play tight. Rapp is too slow, as is Kendrick, to recover if the receiver gets past them. I just wish the Rams, especially with their late picks, drafted great athletes whenever available. Ironically, the Bucs went that route with Zyon McCollum, and Seattle with Wollen. When “freaks” are still on the board, take them. Amare Barno, out of Virginia Tech, is another. Couldn’t the Rams use a big edge rusher with sub-4.4 speed right now?
Bright spots on D, aside from the obvious? Troy Hill is playing very well. Wagner is proving to be an excellent pickup, though I’m betting most Rams fans expected that.
Anyway . . . TSRF, agree about Perkins. I think they should have been using him all along on goal-line situations, at least. RPO, etc. Give the offense a kick in the pants. Might be too tricky to work out, ego-wise. But I’d love to see it happen.
Billy_TParticipantDidn’t know Sofi was so bad. No excuse for it, given the five billion price tag, especially. For that kind of money, you’d think they could go full Mars terraforming.
If the players were smart, they’d say No grass fields? No play. And, again, drop back to 14 games, and no more Thursdays.
The players have more power than they seem to realize. They haven’t made the most of that, IMO.
Billy_TParticipantJust guessing that Akers doesn’t want a Running Back by Committee situation. I’d bet he wants to be the Bell Cow, but I don’t think he ever will be. He isn’t the best blocker, and he fumbles. If they were going to go running back with that pick, I wish they had chosen AJ Dillon instead. A hoss. Nearly 250. He could be that guy. It’s not Akers.
In Jourdan’s recent 11 Personnel Podcast, they finally talked about something I’ve been saying for awhile. The Rams have missed on too many draft picks recently, and when a team has their strategy of going all in for the Ramseys and the Staffords, etc. . . . they have even less wiggle room for those misses.
(Atwell, for example, was an unforgivable pick. Nothing against him. But it was an atrociously dumb choice, IMNSHO.)
Rams are a victim of their own success, in many ways, and they’ve had a staffing Brain Drain too, which includes scouts. Time for a major re-evaluation and reversal of that Brain Drain, and much better drafting from here on out.
Billy_TParticipantAlso makes me wish the NFL had stayed with 14 game seasons. Far better for player health, and I think it makes the individual games matter more. Best way for the NFL to protect the players, if they really cared about that . . . along with mandating grass fields, and no more Thursday games.
And while I’m still in that Old Guy “get off my lawn!” mode, hate to see the Rams on the other side of those kinds of trades, all too often, especially for the one season rentals. It’s time for the Rams to get a slew of picks for someone nearing the end of their careers instead. Can’t remember the last time they did that, but I’m betting it’s been decades.
That’s how you sustain a competitive team, IMO. You find that sweet spot in time when you can get a high return for your older stars nearing their sunset years, and you draft well to keep reloading. Recent example: It looks like Seattle chose the perfect time to trade Russell Wilson. In other sports? The Lakers should have already (at least) tried to trade Lebron.
Know when to hold ’em. No when to fold ’em, etc.
Billy_TParticipantSad to hear about Fanning. He was a really good Ram.
Quick look at the players they got, via wikipedia. I had forgotten what an amazing trade this was for the Rams. Hell, I would have traded Hadl for just Harrah. Or Slater. Or 99% of the guys in this list. One for one.
___
Dennis Harrah = Thirteen seasons for Rams. Six Pro Bowls; 4.8 forty, benched 500 pounds.
Doug France = Two Pro Bowls; seven seasons for the Rams
Jackie Slater = 19 seasons for the Rams. HOF. Seven Pro Bowls;
Nolan Cromwell = 11 seasons for Rams. Four Pro Bowls; 1980s All Decade Team
Monte Jackson = Gave them 14 seasons. Two Pro Bowls
Pat Thomas = Seven seasons. Two Pro BowlsMike Fanning = excellent starter for eight seasons
Billy_TParticipantInjuries happen to every team. Recent articles on league averages show the Rams at about the middle of the pack, and their injuries haven’t been to the team “stars,” unlike other teams. They haven’t lost their key guys. But because they’ve relied on late round picks and UDFA signings to fill out the rest of the roster, even with starting O-line guys, they’re extra susceptible to major downgrades when injuries do happen.
When was the last time the Rams invested high picks in the O-line? When was the last time they HAD high picks?
There is no way it can’t come back to bite them, and it would have been crazy to think the Rams could keep mortgaging the future and never have to pay for it.
To me, it’s just bad chess playing, for far too many years. Trading draft capital for rentals, or near-rentals — Watkins, Cook, etc. Asking far, far too little for players they trade to others, like Woods, Ogletree, Young. As in, in general, the Rams pay far too much for players, and receive far too little for players they trade away.
It’s also problematic, IMO, to rely so heavily on late picks cuz they tend to develop later, and when they finally are good enough to start, the Rams cut them loose and say, “Next man up!!” But, the next men up are late rounders or UDFAs who are later rounders in large part because they’re not ready to start early in their careers.
The cycle would catch up to any team.
I love that they won it all last year. But I think they’ve been playing the F the Draft game for far too long, and I’m far from the only person who thinks that.
As always, hope they prove me waaay wrong.
-
AuthorPosts