Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Public House › Worst movie I've seen in many a moon…
- This topic has 10 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by nittany ram.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 25, 2014 at 7:10 pm #2515nittany ramModerator
“Lucy”.
An ignorance of science, a lousy premise and horrendous acting coalesce into a perfect storm of bad cinema.
My advice to Morgan Freeman? It’s ok to turn down a role once in awhile.
July 26, 2014 at 6:36 am #2571PA RamParticipantAs soon as I heard the “we only use 10 percent of our brain” nonsense I sort of tuned that movie out. I guess it’s a great plot device for a film but I’m not big on bad science.
Don’t get me wrong–I don’t mind stretching things. I’m sure Chris Nolan’s “Interstellar” will stretch things but at least things like “wormholes” are theoretically possible or even things like shared dreams in “Inception” may one day become a reality.
But to start off with the old wives tale of the 10 percent of the brain thing and go from there? Eh.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
July 26, 2014 at 4:14 pm #2609nittany ramModeratorIt was bad, PA. Really bad. And I often go out of my way to give movies the benefit of the doubt but I think I might have suffered some form of PTSD after seeing this. I don’t know when or even if I’ll be able to take a chance on another film.
Heck, I screamed like a little girl in a snake pit when I accidentally bumped into a bin full of 5 dollar DVD’s at Rite Aide today.
July 27, 2014 at 2:10 am #2638znModeratorYeah I saw the “%10 of the brain” thing in the trailer and just went…enh. Didn’t see it.
If what you say is true, and I don’t doubt it, that’s a lotta wasted talent. Besson, Johansson…
.
July 27, 2014 at 9:59 pm #2689wvParticipantWell, it looks like another ‘human-turns-grows-a-superbrain’
script. I think the very first time i saw that story,
it was on the old “Outer Limits” series back in the 60s.
Cept in that show, the guy wore sunglasses to hide
his eyes cause they looked like fried eggs.Anyway, i can watch Scarlett even if the movie’s bad:
- This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by wv.
July 29, 2014 at 8:00 am #2770nittany ramModeratorYeah I saw the “%10 of the brain” thing in the trailer and just went…enh. Didn’t see it.
If what you say is true, and I don’t doubt it, that’s a lotta wasted talent. Besson, Johansson…
.
Johansson wasn’t good but it wasn’t really her fault. Her part was the same ol’ hackneyed role you often see in sci-fi movies such as this. As she gained access to more and more of her brain she became more automaton-like. Her character loses her depth and humanity. Much of her role involved staring blankly and speaking in a flat, emotionless tone. I find it boring that sci-fi movies always depict beings with higher intelligence as being Vulcan-like. It’s like they assume a sense of joy or wonder or sadness could not coexist in a super-smart being.
Spoiler alert….
In the end she merges with a computer and so she exists in the world wide web. Her body is gone and another character asks where she went. He immediately receives a text that says…”I am everywhere.”
So, that makes her what, about the 50th character in a sci-fi film to merge with the global network of computers? It must be getting crowded in there.
July 29, 2014 at 8:09 am #2771znModeratorSo, that makes her what, about the 50th character in a sci-fi film to merge with the global network of computers? It must be getting crowded in there.
Yeah Zola was the best of the lot.
.
July 29, 2014 at 9:54 am #2778PA RamParticipantJohansson wasn’t good but it wasn’t really her fault. Her part was the same ol’ hackneyed role you often see in sci-fi movies such as this. As she gained access to more and more of her brain she became more automaton-like. Her character loses her depth and humanity. Much of her role involved staring blankly and speaking in a flat, emotionless tone. I find it boring that sci-fi movies always depict beings with higher intelligence as being Vulcan-like. It’s like they assume a sense of joy or wonder or sadness could not coexist in a super-smart being.
This is probably the price to pay for going into a transhuman existence. If you believe in the idea that for the species to survive in the long run it will have to somehow morph into a sort of computer–less a carbon based life form but something that can still hold the general “stuff” of humans there probably has to be a merging point. There may have to be a compromise on what that would be.
Okay–yes–yes–I’m making excuses for a terrible movie. It’s early–I just had some Frosted Flakes and my mind drifted off to the transhuman movement. It’s absurd anyway. When computers take over they won’t have any need for us anyway. But since this already may be a simulation who knows?
P.S. This was written only using 1.3 percent of my brain.
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick
July 29, 2014 at 5:49 pm #2803nittany ramModeratorOh yeah, well the Q were transcendent beings and they retained humanoid emotions and failings…
Lucy became sorta like a Q. Like a humorless, expressionless Q traveling through time and space…
- This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by zn.
August 17, 2014 at 3:34 am #4175znModeratorHowdy NR. I fixed the image, which I assume is what you intended.
Here’s how to do images.
First with the image in question, right click it and choose “image info.”
That takes you to a page where you can then copy the image url.
Like so:
What you copy is the blued out part.
Anyway then you come to the post box here, and click “img.” You paste the url in that, and then before posting it will ask you a couple of stupid questions. Check the box, type in any name (I chose “a”) and then post.
August 17, 2014 at 6:27 pm #4242nittany ramModeratorNo that’s cool. I’m glad you did and thanks for the info.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.