Recent Forum Topics Forums Search Search Results for 'patient'

Viewing 30 results - 811 through 840 (of 923 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ;What round will
    you pick a goofy looking QB? Or aren’t there any in this year’s draft?

    I’m thinking Bridge is a strong possibility.

    He has the goofy face,
    but I’m not sure about his
    hand size.

    w
    v
    ==
    STRENGTHS: Tall, narrow body type with athletic footwork and long-striding speed to pick up yards with his legs. Elite-level arm strength and release quickness with the ability to add velocity and extra RPM’s on his throws with ease. Not shy about testing tight windows and trusts his arm to make frozen rope throws and put the ball anywhere he wants on the field.

    He has mobility to keep the play alive when the pocket breaks down, shaking off arm tackles and stepping up with his eyes downfield. Shows the ability to work through his reads and is a quick thinker to make snap decisions. Displayed outstanding toughness playing through an ankle injury most of November 2014.

    WEAKNESSES: Bridge has improved field vision, but needs to develop his eye use and tends to stare down receivers, often leading defenders to his intended target. His receivers will struggle to handle his fastball at times and Bridge needs to develop a change-up and overall better touch to all levels. His mechanics and accuracy need refined, but neither needs an overhaul.

    With only a dozen collegiate games under his belt, Bridge doesn’t have the ideal experience and might need a season or two to develop before he’s ready for consistent game reps, requiring a patient NFL team.

    COMPARES TO: Colin Kaepernick, 49ers — Bridge is tall and lean with a rocket launcher on his right shoulder like the 49ers quarterback and has more than enough velocity on his passes to toss ropes to all levels of the field.

    –Dane Brugler (12/4/14)
    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1776297/brandon-bridge

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #20603

    In reply to: Fairley

    Winnbrad
    Participant

    Winnbrad wrote:
    PFF rates Fairly as “good” overall, whatever that means.

    Because the Rams think he can be more than that, and they think they are just the guys to bring it out of him.

    They were right about Britt, so, they could be right about Fairley.

    In terms of the OL…they still have some free agency moves left and there’s a draft coming and they may also think they have a guy on the roster already. So the OL has plenty of time to pull together.

    I know you’re right. I’m just impatient about the O-line.

    Fingers crossed…

    #20467
    RamBill
    Participant

    http://www.rams-news.com/foles-pep-rally-turns-into-inquisition-on-bradford-trade-pd/%5DFoles Pep Rally Turns into Inquisition on Bradford Trade –PD
    Friday’s introductory news conference for quarterback Nick Foles had all the trappings of a pep rally.

    http://www.rams-news.com/britt-fairley-sign-on-big-day-for-rams-pd/%5DBritt, Fairley Sign on Big Day for Rams –PD
    Just hours after signing Detroit defensive tackle Nick Fairley, the Rams continued to make moves in free agency by re-signing wide receiver Kenny Britt to a two-year deal, according to the team.

    http://www.rams-news.com/rams-re-sign-kenny-britt-pd/%5DRams Re-sign Kenny Britt –PD
    Just hours after signing Detroit defensive tackle Nick Fairley, the Rams continued to make moves in free agency signing wide receiver Kenny Britt to a two-year deal according to the team.

    http://www.rams-news.com/kenny-britts-return-to-rams-best-for-both-sides-wagoner/%5DKenny Britt’s Return to Rams Best for Both Sides –Wagoner
    From the moment wide receiver Kenny Britt arrived in St. Louis on a one-year “prove it” deal in 2014, he made it clear that he needed a fresh start with a familiar face.

    http://www.rams-news.com/no-guarantees-rams-are-done-adding-qbs-wagoner/%5DNo guarantees Rams Are Done Adding QB’s –Wagoner
    Poor Nick Foles. Surrounded by the pomp and circumstance of a glorified pep rally Friday afternoon at Rams Park, Foles was supposed to be the center of attention as the new, albeit possibly temporary, face of the St. Louis Rams franchise.

    http://www.rams-news.com/bernie-fairley-and-ayers-good-fits-for-rams/%5DBernie: Fairley and Ayers Good Fits for Rams
    There’s risk involved, because Fairley was up and down in his career with the Detroit Lions.

    http://www.rams-news.com/gray-an-in-depth-look-at-the-bradford-foles-trade/%5DGray: An In-Depth Look at the Bradford-Foles Trade
    Just five years ago, former Oklahoma Sooners Heisman Trophy winning quarterback Sam Bradford was dropping jaws and setting the NFL world abuzz with an astonishing showing at his pre-draft pro day.

    http://www.rams-news.com/jeff-fisher-discusses-the-foles-ayers-and-fairley-additions-audio/%5DJeff Fisher Discusses the Foles, Ayers and Fairley Additions –Audio

    http://www.rams-news.com/under-the-lights-new-rams-qb-nick-foles-video/%5DUnder the Lights: New Rams QB Nick Foles –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/rich-eisen-interviews-rams-gm-les-snead-video/%5DRich Eisen Interviews Rams GM Les Snead –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/adam-schefter-breaks-down-the-nick-fairley-signing-for-the-rams-video/%5DAdam Schefter Breaks Down the Nick Fairley Signing for the Rams –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/rams-offer-nick-fairley-chance-to-reach-his-potential-wagoner/%5DRams Offer Nick Fairley Chance to Reach his Potential –Wagoner
    In the 2011 NFL draft, the St. Louis Rams had the 14th pick and patiently waited their turn to make a selection while superstar pass-rushers such as J.J. Watt, Von Miller, Aldon Smith and Marcell Dareus came off the board.

    http://www.rams-news.com/rams-sign-fairley-introduce-foles-pd/%5DRams Sign Fairley, Introduce Foles –PD
    ust before introducing their new quarterback, Nick Foles, the Rams brought in another Nick to meet the assemblage of reporters and Rams employees.

    http://www.rams-news.com/so-who-won-the-bradford-foles-trade-pft/%5DSo Who Won the Bradford-Foles Trade? –PFT
    In a week full of surprising moves in the NFL, none came as a bigger shock than the news that the Eagles had traded quarterback Nick Foles to the Rams for quarterback Sam Bradford.

    http://www.rams-news.com/morning-ram-blings-return-on-qbs-wagoner/%5DMorning Ram-blings: Return on QBs –Wagoner
    The St. Louis Rams certainly haven’t been shy about making deals that involve quarterbacks going elsewhere and getting draft pick compensation in return.

    http://www.rams-news.com/nick-foles-thankful-to-be-in-st-louis-video/%5DNick Foles Thankful To Be In St. Louis –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/nick-fairley-talks-after-signing-with-the-rams-video/%5DNick Fairley Talks After Signing with the Rams –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/jeff-fisher-talks-bradford-foles-trade-audio/%5DJeff Fisher Talks Bradford-Foles Trade –Audio

    http://www.rams-news.com/rams-gm-les-snead-explains-foles-bradford-trade-free-agency-and-draft-audio/%5DRams’ GM Les Snead Explains Foles-Bradford Trade, Free Agency and Draft –Audio

    http://www.rams-news.com/nick-foles-its-an-honor-to-be-here-video/%5DNick Foles: “It’s an honor to be here.” –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/amari-cooper-discusses-his-pro-day-video/%5DAmari Cooper Discusses His Pro Day –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/will-witherspoon-breaks-down-the-bradford-foles-trade-video/%5DWill Witherspoon Breaks Down the Bradford-Foles Trade –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/lance-kendricks-talks-re-signing-with-rams-video/%5DLance Kendricks Talks Re-Signing with Rams –Video

    http://www.rams-news.com/grudens-qb-camp-best-of-brett-hundley-video/%5DGruden’s QB Camp: Best Of Brett Hundley –Video

    #20418

    In reply to: Fairley

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams offer Nick Fairley chance to reach his potential

    By Nick Wagoner

    http://espn.go.com/blog/nflnation/post/_/id/164062/rams-offer-nick-fairley-chance-to-reach-his-potential

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — In the 2011 NFL draft, the St. Louis Rams had the 14th pick and patiently waited their turn to make a selection while superstar pass-rushers such as J.J. Watt, Von Miller, Aldon Smith and Marcell Dareus came off the board. While Chris Long was locked into one position, the Rams desperately wanted to bolster their pass rush and kept their fingers crossed that one of the other top defensive linemen would fall in their lap.

    As the Detroit Lions came up with the 13th pick, they took Nick Fairley. The Rams turned in the card with end Robert Quinn’s name on it nearly as fast as Quinn bends the edge against a left tackle.

    On Tuesday morning, the Rams turned what four years ago was an “either/or” situation into a resounding “and.” A day after arriving in St. Louis, Fairley signed a one-year contract worth $5 million, which could reach the $8-million range with incentives.

    That Fairley was even available was a product of a disappointing four-year stint with the Lions in which Fairley was plagued by injuries, weight problems and a couple of arrests. Despite glimpses of potential — especially in 2012 and 2013 when he posted 69 tackles and 11.5 sacks in 28 games — the Lions declined to exercise their fifth-year option on Fairley in hopes it would motivate him.

    It didn’t necessarily work as Fairley had 14 tackles and a sack in eight 2014 games before knee injuries cost him the other half of the season. So it was that Fairley hit the open market on Tuesday in search of a chance to prove the potential that only came in small doses in Detroit can be consistently applied in a new locale.

    In choosing the Rams’ one-year deal, Fairley essentially signed a “prove-it” deal intended to bolster his stock and allow him to cash in next season. And, though Fairley is likely to serve as the primary backup to Aaron Donald and Michael Brockers, Fairley couldn’t have picked a better situation in which to bet on himself.

    Fairley joins a defensive line that’s already stocked with pass-rushers Long and Quinn, defensive rookie of the year Donald, former first-round pick Brockers and quality backups such as William Hayes and Eugene Sims. He’s the fifth former first-round pick on the defensive line and should have no shortage of one-on-one pass rush opportunities.

    “I feel like it’s a perfect fit for me,” Fairley said. “The guys in this group, the D-line, they are young and they’re moving forward and I want to be part of it.

    “You got those guys up there and a guy next to me like Aaron is going to take on some double teams, I’m going to take on some double teams so it’s going to be a good fit for me.”

    Line coaches Mike Waufle and Clyde Simmons also come with strong reputations in league circles and Waufle’s hard-charging style developed in years as a Marine should only serve Fairley well in maintaining discipline.

    “[He’s] a great guy, matter of fact my dad is an ex-Marine so I know a little bit about ex-Marines,” Fairley said.

    It also doesn’t hurt the Rams have become Auburn North with former Tigers Greg Robinson, Tre Mason and Daren Bates on the roster and general manager Les Snead offering input on the roster.

    But even with that support system in place, it’s up to Fairley to become the player many thought he’d become. For his part, Fairley seems to have put in the work to come to St. Louis in shape.

    At times during his stint with the Lions, Fairley’s weight ballooned to as high as 320 pounds but the help of a personal chef allowed him to trim down to about 290 pounds before last season. There were concerns the knee injuries he suffered last year might cause his weight to go back up, but Fairley continued to work with the chef and arrived in St. Louis at a sleek 280 pounds.

    In fact, Fairley is now in position to actually put weight on before the season, though he’s looking to enlist the help of a local personal chef to help him do it the right way.

    “I’m going to be looking for one out here so if anybody knows a chef, holler at me,” Fairley said, laughing. “I’m going to put on some muscle so when I come back in April with the group of guys in the conditioning and work program, I’m sure I’ll get to where I want to be.”

    If he does, an already scary Rams’ defensive line could get even better, and Fairley’s one-year gamble could pay off in an equally big way.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    s

    2015 NFL Draft Position Review: Quarterbacks

    By Charlie Campbell.

    http://walterfootball.com/draft2015positionreviewQB.php

    This page was last updated March 5, 2015. Follow me @walterfootball for updates.

    Position Review: Quarterbacks

    Quarterback Class
    Early-round talent: C
    Mid-round: D
    Late-round: D
    Overall grade: C-

    2014 prospects vs 2013
    Jameis Winston > Blake Bortles
    Marcus Mariota > Johnny Manziel
    Garrett Grayson < Teddy Bridgewater
    Brett Hundley < Derek Carr
    Bryce Petty < Jimmy Garoppolo
    Sean Mannion > Logan Thomas
    Shane Carden < Tom Savage
    Cody Fajardo < Aaron Murray

    The 2012 class was a banner year for quarterbacks. The 2013 class was ugly in comparison, and 2014 also paled in comparison. That is the case once again. Although the difference is that Jameis Winston and Marcus Mariota are far better prospects than any quarterback since Andrew Luck in the 2012 class. In this analyst’s opinion, Winston is in Luck’s league entering the NFL, but is just a hair behind. Winston is a better prospect than Cam Newton, Matthew Stafford or Sam Bradford. Winston is a true franchise quarterback who is a near-flawless player on the field and is just a little bit behind Luck.

    If you were to merge the two classes together, Winston would be the clear cut No. 1. Mariota would be the second rated-quarterback, and multiple team sources have said that Mariota is a better prospect than Bortles; a few teams said the comparison is not even close. After Winston and Mariota the 2014 first-rounders and Carr would slot in, ahead of Grayson. That being said, WalterFootball.com knows some teams that have a higher grade on Grayson than they did on Bridgewater last year.

    Garoppolo and Grayson are about equal as prospects. Some teams might rank Hundley ahead of those two, while others would firmly put Hundley behind them.

    Petty and Mannion are about equal to the fourth- and fifth-rounders from last year of Thomas, Savage, Murray and A.J. McCarron. However, Titans’ sixth-round pick Zach Mettenberger was a better talent than all of that group but fell because of off-the-field and injury concerns. Carden and Fajardo may not get drafted this year.

    Safest Pick: Jameis Winston, Florida State
    Overall, Winston is the best pure passer in the 2015 NFL Draft; the rest aren’t even close. Winston has a great skill set for the NFL with a strong arm, superb accuracy, amazing anticipation, field vision, football I.Q., the ability to hit tight windows and leadership. There is no doubt that Winston is the safest pick on the field with zero football flaws. Jameis Winston is the real deal. I honestly believe he is going to have a Hall of Fame career.

    Previous Picks:
    2014: Derek Carr
    2013: Geno Smith

    Biggest Bust Potential: Brett Hundley, UCLA
    This was a tough call, but I’m going with Hundley. The reason is how he struggled to read the field in college and didn’t show significant improvement from 2013 to 2014. Hundley never hung tough in the face of a rush while delivering passes. That led to him being sacked over 100 times the past two years. If Hundley’s first read was covered, he regularly looked to run immediately. He has a nice skill set and seems to have a good work ethic, but he needs a lot of development as a pocket passer.

    Previous Picks:
    2014: Johnny Manziel
    2013: Mike Glennon

    Quarterback Rankings by Attributes

    Accuracy:
    NFL prototype: Aaron Rodgers, Packers

    Jameis Winston
    Garrett Grayson
    Marcus Mariota
    Bryce Petty
    Brett Hundley

    Recap: The most important characteristic for any quarterback in the NFL is accuracy. Not only do accurate quarterbacks reduce turnovers and maintain time of possession, they increase the opportunities for skill-position players to have a bigger impact. Thus, accurate signal-callers will give teams more return on their dollars with high-priced wide receivers. It takes an accurate quarterback to be a weapon as a pocket passer, and the elite quarterbacks are able to beat good coverage with precision passes into tight windows.

    Hands down, Winston is the most accurate passer in this group. It’s not even close. Even from his first game as a starter, Winston was deadly with his accuracy. He had completion percentages of 67 and 65 percent in his two years at Florida State. Not only can Winston put the ball in a shoe box downfield, he has amazing anticipation to lead his receivers open and throw accurate passes before they are even turned to the quarterback. His tremendous football I.Q., instincts and anticipation lead to him being even more accurate. Entering the NFL, Winston’s accuracy is phenomenal.

    You might be surprised that I have Grayson rated second considering Mariota had higher completion percentages in his career. However if you watch the offenses the signal-callers ran, it is clear why. Grayson was throwing the ball with timing and accuracy into tight windows out of a pro-style offense. Mariota’s college system consistently produced receivers running open in busted coverage. Grayson does have to get better at throwing deep balls more accurately though.

    Don’t get me wrong, Mariota was accurate in college. However there were points in his career that his placement would be off at times, but he made strides. Accuracy potential is there with Mariota, but he has to learn to throw into tight windows. Oregon’s offense produced wide-open receivers, and he won’t be able to live on that in the NFL. When Mariota had covered wideouts, he typically ran the ball rather than throwing into a tight window. That will have to change at the next level.

    Petty is similar to Mariota as a system quarterback. Hundley and Petty are tied for fourth. They both need to improve their accuracy and ball placement for the NFL.

    Arm Strength:
    NFL prototype: Joe Flacco, Ravens

    Marcus Mariota
    Jameis Winston
    Brett Hundley
    Garrett Grayson
    Bryce Petty

    Recap: The quarterback with the strongest arm doesn’t always mean that much. Last year, the quarterbacks with the strongest arms where Logan Thomas, Zach Mettenberger and Tom Savage. All were third-day selection, and none are viewed as the rock-solid quarterback of the future for their respective franchise.

    I give the edge to Mariota, but he and Winston are extremely close. I think Mariota may spin the ball a little faster and tighter, but they both have strong arms that can make all the throws.

    Hundley and Grayson both have good arms. They can make all the NFL throws. At the Senior Bowl, Grayson showed the arm strength to have his passes cut through some wind and hit receivers downfield. Hundley and Grayson are above average with arm strength.

    Petty’s arm is adequate, but it isn’t a cannon that will won’t blow anyone away.

    Field Vision:
    NFL prototype: Peyton Manning, Broncos

    Jameis Winston
    Garrett Grayson
    Marcus Mariota
    Bryce Petty
    Brett Hundley

    Recap: Field vision is one characteristic that separates the elite quarterbacks of the NFL. Quarterbacks who throw a lot of interceptions are inclined to lock on to their primary read and stare down receivers. Signal-callers with good field vision can quickly work through their progressions and see more than one receiver on a route. Such quarterbacks also can help get wideouts open by looking off safeties and playing games with their eyes. Many college quarterbacks enter the NFL with subpar field vision and have to improve this at the next level.

    This was not a tough call by any means; Winston is absolutely the best of this group. He has excellent field vision entering the NFL. Winston is very advanced at reading defenses and working through his progressions to find the open receivers. He has also shown the ability to look off safeties. He is also ranked first because he stays patient in the pocket and delivers the ball well while under duress. Winston keeps his downfield while under pressure, and while Grayson does that somewhat, Winston clearly does it better than any of the group. He hangs tough and reads the field to deliver the ball even when he knows he’s going to take a shot.

    Grayson has quality field vision. He has quick eyes to work through his progressions, and he showed the ability to move around in the pocket and still keep his eyes downfield. His field vision still needs some work, but he’s better than the other quarterbacks in terms of reading a defense and going through his receiving options.

    Mariota shows the potential for good field vision at times, but never got consistent. There were plays where he would scan his options and other plays where he would tuck and run when his first read was covered. Mariota didn’t have a lot of complex plays called where he would drop back, survey many options, look off a safety and fire the ball to an open receiver. Oregon’s offense was much more simplistic. Mariota improved in 2014 and should continue to get better with NFL coaching. This one of the biggest hurdles for Mariota to overcome in order to turn into a good pro.

    Petty is in a similar state to Mariota. He needs to improve his field vision and ability to read defenses. Hundley is a mixed bag. His field vision was excellent against Arizona State last year, but that was an aberration. Hundley’s field vision was awful in other games.

    Decision-Making:
    NFL prototype: Tom Brady, Patriots

    Jameis Winston
    Marcus Mariota
    Garrett Grayson
    Brett Hundley
    Bryce Petty

    Recap: This was a tough one. While Mariota threw fewer interceptions than Winston, Oregon’s offense didn’t present him with NFL-style decision-making like Winston’s did. As far as developing NFL decision-making for throwing against pro secondaries in an NFL playbook, Winston is further ahead than Mariota. Generally, Winston had sound decision-making when you consider his body of work over the past two seasons.

    Mariota, Grayson, Petty and Hundley all did well with their decision-making. Because of his offense, Grayson could have a smoother transition to the NFL, but Mariota was very adept at avoiding turnovers. Grayson and Hundley each only threw five interceptions last year. Mariota totaled four, but a number of picks were dropped. Petty allowed seven and could have had more.

    Upside:
    NFL prototype: Andrew Luck, Colts

    Marcus Mariota
    Brett Hundley
    Jameis Winston
    Bryce Petty
    Garrett Grayson

    Recap: All five of these quarterbacks have some athletic upside with the room to grow. It isn’t like last year’s group where guys like A.J. McCarron and Aaron Murray were pretty much tapped out athletically and what you saw was what you would get.

    A few sources have stated that the quarterback who has the most upside in this draft class is Mariota. And that makes sense because he adds more of a dynamic running element than any of the other quarterbacks. In terms of athletic skill sets, Mariota is firmly the best in the draft class.

    Hundley isn’t far behind Mariota in terms of arm strength and running talent. Winston has good athleticism for such a big quarterback and isn’t a statue in the pocket. He can take off and hurt teams with his feet. For an example, check out his highlight-reel touchdown run against Oklahoma State in the season opener.

    Petty has the ability to move around and make plays on the ground. In the NFL, his ability to run and hurt defenses on the ground won’t be as strong as it was in college.

    While he’s last on this list, athletically, Grayson has some upside to him. He can move around with his feet and pick up some first downs on the ground. Grayson has the potential to develop as a passer as well.

    Mobility:
    NFL prototype: Cam Newton, Panthers

    Marcus Mariota
    Brett Hundley
    Jameis Winston
    Bryce Petty
    Garrett Grayson

    Recap: Mobility is becoming a more sought-after attribute for quarterbacks in the NFL. The league’s top young quarterbacks, Andrew Luck, Robert Griffin III and Russell Wilson all have excellent mobility. They aren’t statues in the pocket like Tom Brady or Peyton Manning.

    Offensive coordinators like to challenge defenses with spread-option plays. Mobility also can help a quarterback to avoid hits and, in turn, avoid injuries if the skill is used wisely. Jon Gruden and Rich Gannon have always maintained that there are a few third downs in every game that a mobile quarterback can provide a first down over other quarterbacks who may have to force a pass into a covered receiver. Having mobility is in demand.

    Mariota is the most mobile quarterback in the 2015 NFL Draft, and no one else is even close. He is a quick, shifty runner who can destroy defenses with his feet. Over the past two seasons, Mariota ran for about 1,500 yards with 24 touchdowns. His mobility and running ability is very rare.

    Hundley is a mobile quarterback. He is very skilled at moving around defenders and extending plays with his feet. Hundley also can pick up yards running through the secondary.

    Winston is a lot like Big Ben with the ability to avoid sacks with his size and feet. He is very tough to bring down for defenders. Winston can move around in the pocket and take off downfield when he has to.

    Petty and Grayson both have good pocket mobility with the skills to run for a first down in third-and-manageable situations.

    Ball Security:
    NFL prototype: Tom Brady, Patriots

    Marcus Mariota
    Garrett Grayson
    Bryce Petty
    Jameis Winston
    Brett Hundley

    Recap: Obviously, turnovers are killers for offenses in the NFL, and quarterbacks who turn the ball over a lot won’t stay on the field long.

    A lot has been made about Winston’s interception total from last year, but this is closer than you would think, and I don’t actually think a lot separates him from the top. Mariota had a lot of fumbles in college, but he was lucky that Oregon recovered them the vast majority of the time. He also should have thrown more interceptions as he had quite a few dropped last season. So while Mariota did a good job of avoiding turnovers, his numbers are a little misleading.

    Grayson and Petty both did a good job of avoiding turnovers. Winston’s interceptions are also overblown. Not all of them were on him as he had a very young receiving corps and his offensive line struggled in pass protection at times during 2014. If you look at Winston’s body of work over the past two seasons, there really was only two games that he had poor ball security – against Florida and Louisville last year.

    Hundley improved his ability to avoid interceptions in 2014, but he still has to work on that for the NFL. Hundley also needs to avoid fumbles when he runs with the ball.

    Intangibles:
    NFL prototype: Drew Brees, Saints

    Marcus Mariota
    Garrett Grayson
    Brett Hundley
    Bryce Petty
    Jameis Winston

    Recap: The only quarterback with questionable intangibles is Winston. There are well-publicized off-the-field maturity questions with him. However, I believe they’ve been overblown and so do NFL teams. Scouts and sources say that Winston is very good in the locker room and team facility. He is a leader and hard worker who grinds tons of tape, and did everything the baseball and football coaches asked of him at Florida State. Winston’s problems came in his down time, but plenty of good NFL players grew up after entering the league as immature young men.

    Obviously, Mariota’s intangibles are off the charts. He is known for being exceptional as a person with character, work ethic and dedication who leads by example. NFL teams love Mariota as a person and feel you couldn’t draw up character any better.

    The remaining three signal-callers all have good intangibles. Grayson was a leader in his program’s resurgence. Hundley is known to be very hard working. Petty also is known to have intangibles that are a plus.

    While Winston had some maturity issues in college, I think all of these quarterbacks present plus intangibles for the NFL.

    #19558
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Gordon: Relocation talk reduces Rams draft intrigue

    By Jeff Gordon

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/jeff-gordon/gordon-relocation-talk-reduces-rams-draft-intrigue/article_418708bb-56c1-529f-950d-98b359f1e29d.html

    While most pro football fans were gearing up for their team’s big games in recent years, Rams fans have fired up for the annual NFL draft.

    Each spring they channeled their inner Mel Kiper Jr.-Todd McShay personnel debate. They watched college all-star games, tuned into the scouting combine, pored over draft projections and wondered which collegiate stars would bring hope to Rams Park and break the cycle of despair.

    Recent drafts have been way more entertaining than the actual games. The remarkable Robert Griffin III heist made the Rams a major draft story three years running.

    While the Rams have remained predictable with their game strategy — especially on offense — they have pulled some clever surprises at the draft. Last year’s class was one of the best St. Louis has ever seen.

    But that fun is done. As preparations for the 2015 draft intensify, many Rams fans merely shrug.

    This team seems unlikely to captivate us with its draft maneuvers. Les Snead spent No. 4 and No. 6 picks to add run-stuffing safety Mark Barron to his stack of run-stuffing safeties last season, so the team lacks the volume of picks needed to get highly creative.

    Then there is the larger issue of the Rams’ future here, or lack thereof. Owner Stan Kroenke is trying to move to team to Los Angeles. Many fans view the 2015 season as a farewell tour, given the momentum Kroenke’s Inglewood project is gaining.

    Yes, there’s a chance St. Louis could emerge from this chaos with a new stadium and a place in the league. But local fans become more alienated by the day, so they spend less time wondering which 2015 additions could make a difference by 2018.

    Right now Rams fans in Southern California are more interested in that topic.

    The Rams’ offseason activity has added to the local indifference. Their free agent priority appears to be the interior offensive line. One of their top draft priorities is offensive tackle.

    Injury-battered Jake Long was another in the long line of expensive free agent busts for the Rams, and the offensive line is crying for fresh legs.

    Iowa offensive tackle Brandon Scherff is a person of interest to the Rams, assuming he gets down to the No. 10 slot. Stanford’s Andrus Peat could fit that bill, too, and he appears likely to be there for the Rams.

    Yes, the Rams could buck up and overpay free agent Joe Barksdale to remain at right tackle. Yes, coach Jeff Fisher and Snead could sift through the slim pickings and (gulp) add another tackle from the open market.

    But circumstances suggest drafting a tackle is the right play, instead of going for a wide receiver like Kevin White, Amari Cooper or DeVante Parker. The Rams could re-up Kenny Britt to continue his mentoring of Brian Quick and count on Mountaineer pals Tavon Austin and Stedman Bailey to finally break out.

    Should that plan fail, the Rams can target wide receivers in future drafts after firming up the offensive line foundation.

    Adding fresh blockers wouldn’t do much for marketing … but at this point, marketing is a moot point for the franchise. There isn’t much the sales department can do to move tickets to fans in this region for this season.

    The Rams can only hope their opponents don’t travel well in 2015.

    Fisher is prepared to take a similarly patient approach at quarterback by giving Sam Bradford one more season, assuming the money makes sense.

    Why not? The free agent alternatives are pedestrian and the 10th overall pick seems unlikely to yield their quarterback of the future.

    The Rams can trot out Bradford one more time, find a solid back-up and draft somebody with long-term potential in the second or third round.

    So what if Bradford breaks down again? The Rams could just leave him on the curb with the used player lounge furniture if the team packs up and moves to SoCal.

    The team could get its fresh start with a new quarterback better than, say, Brian Hoyer. Next year’s free agent quarterback class can’t possibly be as bad as this one.

    Fisher kept things in house by promoting quarterbacks coach Frank Cignetti to the offensive coordinator post vacated by the oft-maligned Brian Schottenheimer.

    This was a sensible move. Cignetti helped coax reasonable production from Shaun Hill and Austin Davis last season after Bradford went down. Fisher isn’t looking to reinvent his offense in the fourth year of his regime, so the status quo rules.

    Cignetti accepted the challenge of taking Fisher’s familiar run-oriented philosophy and getting better results. And maybe, just maybe, the Rams will actually complete a few passes to Austin down the field for a change.

    New quarterbacks coach Chris Weinke was also a solid hire under the circumstances. He refined his teaching skills at the IMG Academy, working with aspiring NFL quarterbacks like Russell Wilson and Cam Newton.

    This is an entry level position coaching job, so the uncertain Rams future shouldn’t concern him. Weinke is getting his big break at the highest level of coaching.

    He will get to mold whichever young quarterback the Rams draft. He is bringing lots of energy to this challenge.

    At least somebody around here is excited about what the organization’s long-range future may hold.[/quote]

    #19513
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Bernie: Bradford should cut Rams a break

    By Bernie Miklasz

    http://www.stltoday.com/sports/columns/bernie-miklasz/bernie-bradford-should-cut-rams-a-break/article_2cf334ea-38f7-53f4-b1b8-743ed39b16fc.html

    Oh, goodie … it’s your lucky day! Time for another hot take on Rams quarterback Sam Bradford. And I’m sure there will be many more before he moves on, or the Rams move on, or whatever happens next in their unfortunate, unsuccessful relationship.

    Let’s start by getting a several preliminaries out of the way:

    * Bradford is entering the final season of his six-year rookie deal worth $76 million. Bradford is scheduled to make $12.985 million in salary this season, but he’ll count $16.58 million against the team’s salary cap.

    * It’s not Bradford’s fault that he got stuck with a terrible football team, or that he was the last No. 1 overall draft pick before the NFL and the NFL players’ union changed the system for rookie compensation in 2011. Bradford’s $76 million was pretty much locked in as soon as the Rams picked him at the top of the 2010 draft. There were no negotiations. He was going make as much money as a Wal Mart heir no matter what he did during the life of the contract.

    * Our Jim Thomas — the former star running back at Southwest High School on the city’s south side — has reported, on multiple occasions, that the Rams would like Bradford to restructure the contract and play 2015 at a lower salary.

    * Our man Thomas also reports that the Rams and Bradford’s agent Tom Condon have been unable to reach an agreement. There is resistance in the Bradford camp.

    * Despite the fact that Bradford has had two knee surgeries … since the fall of 2013 … and that he’s missed the last 25 regular season games … and that he has started only 49 of a possible 80 games during his first five seasons … and that his injury problems date back to his final season of college ball and missing most of the games at Oklahoma in 2009 … the Rams LOVE him. Coach Jeff Fisher and GM Les Snead and offensive coordinator Frank Cignetti and QB coach Chris Weinke have all made that abundantly clear. To quote the famous poet 50 Cent, the Rams’ bosses LOVE Sam Bradford the way a fat kid love cake. (And I do love cake, by the way.) Heck, Fisher basically sought Bradford’s approval before promoting Cignetti and hiring Weinke.

    * When the Rams’ folks talk about Bradford, I have to go for the Q tips to clean my ears and make sure I’m hearing things correctly; the Indy Colts don’t carry on about Andrew Luck the way the Rams slobber over Bradford. My late father Bernie Sr. never talked about Johnny Unitas the way Fisher pumps up Bradford.

    * It’s one of the most remarkable things I’ve seen, considering that the Rams have WON 18 GAMES WITH BRADFORD AS A STARTING QB since the beginning of the 2010 season. … yes, a whopping 18 WINS … Goodness, the way this is going, I fully expect Rams owner Stan Kroenke to go to Bradford to seek Sam’s permission to move the team to Los Angeles or keep it in St. Louis. I’m surprised that Rams Chief Operating Officer Kevin Demoff hasn’t gone to Dave Peacock and Bob Blitz to demand that Bradford be put in charge of designing the new football stadium.

    * Of course, the current predicament is mostly the Rams’ own fault. Snead and Fisher failed to take a proactive and aggressive approach in securing a legitimate QB alternative to Bradford. Especially after Bradford went down the first time, the Rams should have used a premium draft choice to select and develop Bradford’s successor or replacement. They could have, at least in theory, made a trade for a veteran NFL starter. Or reached higher than, say, Shaun Hill. Instead, Snead-Fisher drafted Garrett Gilbert in the 6th round last year, they signed Hill, and they brought Austin Davis back. That’s it. Do you see quality insurance or a future plan there? Nope.

    * Condon is a great agent. A legendary agent. A wise agent. And a tough agent. Condon is apparently determined to make sure that Bradford receives full payment on the original contract. And if you look at this from Condon’s viewpoint … why should he settle for less? There’s a shortage of quarterbacks in this league, which explains the recent free-agent feeding frenzy to sign marginal NFL starter Josh McCown. (Cleveland “won” the bidding.) The Buffalo Bills just made a trade with Minnesota for that prized catch, Matt Cassel. The list of remaining free-agent quarterbacks reads like something out 1987, when desperate teams were signing replacement-squad QBs to rush in and start games with the veterans out on strike. Heck, Sammy Garza and Shawn Halloran might be able to find a backup gig right now.

    * And when Condon looks at the free-agent list, and when he scans the Rams roster, and when he knows that the Rams have done nothing to give themselves a legitimate option at QB to possibly move Bradford to the side … well, what do you expect Condon to do? In this barren quarterback market, why should Bradford accept less money when the Rams — more than anyone — are faithfully declaring their undying love for Sam?

    From a pure business/bargaining position, I’m on Condon’s side. Again, the Rams largely put themselves in this mess by drafting Bradford, and they’ve kept themselves stuck in the muck by staying with Bradford and ignoring the obvious alarms.

    But that’s only one side of it.

    Here’s the other: Bradford should give the Rams a break.

    Why?

    I could list many reasons, but let’s stick with three:

    1. Because $am already collected about $63 million from the Rams, and he’s started only 61.25 percent of the regular-season games, and the team is 18-30-1 when he starts. Again, he has no obligation to take a pay cut. But in this case, it’s the right thing to do. The Rams have been incredibly supportive and patient with Bradford. And it isn’t unreasonable to ask him to help out _ yes, even though they clearly deserve to be caught in this foolish position of depending on him again.

    2. Because if $am accepts less money in 2015, the Rams will have more money to spend on free agents. I’m not saying they’d spend it wisely. They’ve had too many swings-and-misses in free agency during the Snead-Fisher regime. But at least the Rams would have more money in hand to seek solutions, fill holes, and put a better team around Bradford. The Rams require assistance on the offensive line. They need a tackle, a guard, and probably a center. Bradford is coming off two consecutive seasons wrecked by knee injuries. Doesn’t he want the best possible protection he can get? By taking a pay cut, Bradford would be investing in his own safety.

    3. Because if $am plays at a reduced rate, and he has the 2015 season that he and everyone else has been waiting for … can you imagine the kind of berserk, preposterous and insane bidding for him on the open free-agent market after the ’15 season? If NFL general managers are losing their minds over Josh McCown, Bradford would cash in for a huge contract.

    If the Rams are willing to put attainable incentives in a reworked Bradford contract, he’d probably end up making close to the original $13 million, anyway.

    Bradford needs to play and perform. And if he plays and performs at a quality level in 2015, he’ll make plenty of money going forward, and will more than make up for any salary concessions he grants now.

    If five-time league MVP Peyton Manning can take a pay cut in Denver … it’s hardly unreasonable, let alone outrageous, to ask Bradford to do the same.

    #19491

    In reply to: Draft Success Rate

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Tuesday, March 27, 2012
    Breaking Down the RG3 Trade via Trade Chart
    (What does the math say about the RG3 trade? Image via)
    There is still a great deal of debate in many NFL circles if the Washington Redskins gave up too much to move up to the #2 spot and draft Robert Griffin IIII (possibly Andrew Luck but highly doubtful). While many draftniks, some NFL fans and some experts will tell you that no price is too high for a franchise QB (if you don’t have one- most teams don’t) but some do believe that the Redskins mortgaged their future for 1 player. Hopefully by doing some math (gah! Math, it’s too early for math!!!!) we can determine if the Redskins got a reasonable deal for moving up or were they raked over the coals by the Rams.

    What I’m doing today is to explain the Trade Value Chart and by using this unofficial but valuable NFL guide to determine how much was the move from #2 to #6 worth and whether the ‘Skins made a reasonable offer to move up to that spot. We’ll also look at what the Browns may or may not have offered in order to move up and see how their offer looks compared to the Redskins.In future blog posts, for comparison, we’ll look at some of the trades that went down for franchise QBs over the past few years and also compare those trades to the TVC.

    Remember, the TVC isn’t the end all/be all when it comes to trades. It’s an unofficial guide that serves as a baseline for a trade. Some teams have variations of the TVC to compensate for salary (like the old CBA where high draft picks could get as much as $50 million guaranteed before taking a single NFL snap) and some teams have higher values for picks in certain spots (for example the 2nd round is a very valuable round to some teams because you’re getting some 1st caliber talent for less than you have to pay in the 1st round). So more or less, when you do a trade you hope to have traded your picks for an item of equal value- thus you want to have about a 0 when you subtract the point value you are receiving by the points giving up using the equation below.

    Equation:
    Draft Pick(s) received (total TVC points) – Draft Pick(s) Given (total TVC Points) = x (0, + or – TVC pts)

    Here’s a link to what a current (standardized) TVC should look like. This is what I’ll be using for today’s discussion. What you also need to know is how picks are valued (or de-valued) for future years. This is important to understanding what the Redskins did with future picks. When a trade is made, the picks for that year’s draft are applied to the TVC. But future picks are valued one round lower per year after that year’s draft. So a 2013 1st round pick is given similar value to a 2012 2nd round pick etc.

    Here’s a great example: Redskins trade QB Jason Campbell, to Oakland for 4th round 2012 pick.
    In 2012 this is a great move for the Redskins. We’ve got an additional 4th rounder. But going by the trade value chart when the trade back in 2010, that 4th rounder is de-valued to the equivalent of a 6th rounder. This is because the Redskins had to wait two years (two drafts) to be able to use that pick. People using the TVC chart take that waiting into consideration and that’s why future picks are de-valued- you have to wait to use them and that you can’t use that pick now.

    So, now we have that out of the way, let’s get to what you want to read about.

    The RG3 trade

    Redskins get: #2 2012 draft (2,600 points)

    Rams get: #6 2012 draft (1,600 points)
    #39 2012 draft (510 points)
    Redskins 2013 1st round pick (~ 520 points estimated)*
    Redskins 2014 1st round pick (~240 points estimated)*

    * It’s never easy to determine what future draft picks are worth since we don’t know when that team is picking in 2013 or beyond. Since the Redskins are making this trade in 2012 we base those future picks off of where they are drafting this year. So, #6 de-valued one round (for one year of waiting) is equal to a pick at #38 thus, 520 points. #6 de-valued two rounds (2014 pick= 2 years) is worth 240 points.

    When we do the math: 2600pts (Redskins receiving) – 2870 (Redskins giving) = -270 points.

    For speculation sake, let’s look at what the Browns offered**:
    #4 2012 draft (1,800 points)
    #22 2012 draft (780 points)
    Browns 2013 1st round pick (~540 points estimated)
    ** To be honest, we never really found out what the Browns actually offered. The rumored amount is “three first round picks”. The problem is that we don’t know if those picks were the 2 1st round picks from 2012 draft or say 1st rounders in 2012 (#4 overall), 2013 and 2014

    For the hell of it let’s look at that scenario:
    #4 2012 draft (1,800 points)
    Browns 2013 1st round pick (~540 points estimated)
    Browns 2014 1st round pick (~250 points estimated)

    When we do the math (scenario 1): 2600pts (Browns receiving) – 3120 (Browns giving) = -520
    So based on the TVC the Browns actually offered up much more short term value than what the Redskins offered even though the Redskins offered up more picks and what could be more valuable picks if the Redskins continue to struggle.

    When we do the math (scenario 2): 2600pts (Browns receiving) -2590 (Browns giving) = +10
    Hmmmmm……I’m starting to wonder if this was what the Browns actually offered up to the Rams. It’s the closest of all three offers to zero. Remember, ideally you want to be at zero or have a positive value when you do a trade. A zero value based on the chart is considered a trade of equal value.

    Analysis: The Redskins get their guy more or less and for the Redskins they gave up an additional 1st round pick in 2014 to win the RG3 sweepstakes. Remember, the Rams didn’t offer a bidding war to contending teams. Rams GM Les Snead wanted each team to throw out their best offer and the winning team was the team that offered the most. The Redskins offered three high picks (along with swapping their 6th for the Rams 2nd) to get their guy (or at least get to the spot to get their guy). The Rams get three potential starters out of the deal so think the equivalent of Trent Williams, Ryan Kerrigan and Jarvis Jenkins. That’s a lot of potential talent, although the Rams will have to be patient through three drafts before they can collect all of those picks. For the Rams sake, it will hopefully be worth the wait or Jeff Fisher and Les Snead will be looking for new jobs.

    The Redskins had to make this trade no matter how it pans out. Manning wasn’t coming to DC. The Redskins didn’t like what was on the free agent market (Flynn et al.) and Ryan Tannehill is a project. The Redskins had to give up a lot because Cleveland and Miami were serious about moving up as well and Cleveland had the most ammo to win a bidding war. Classic law of supply and demand. The more demand for an item (including draft picks) the higher the cost. The Redskins were willing to pay the higher cost (something Dan Snyder has never had a problem doing) and as a Redskins fan I thank them for doing it.

    As for Cleveland, they get to keep their draft picks and hope they can find talent to build around Colt McCoy. McCoy is actually a good fit for Holmgren’s style of WCO. It was clear to me that McCoy had no play making WRs to target, no RB to back him up (Peyton Hillis was injured a big chunk of 2011) and no one to block for him with exception to their LT. So instead of crying to Browns’ season ticket holders about how he was screwed, Holmgren needs to figure out what players the Browns need to help McCoy and learn how to follow directions.

    http://walkingdeadmanblog.blogspot.com/2012/03/breaking-down-rg3-trade-via-trade-chart.html

    Agamemnon

    #19357
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    NFC West free agency preview: Tough choices for Seahawks, 49ers

    Nate Davis, USA TODAY Sports

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2015/03/01/nfc-west-free-agency-seahawks-49ers-cardinals-rams-byron-maxwell-mike-iupati-frank-gore/24170403/

    A snapshot of each team’s roster and considerations heading into free agency, which officially begins March 10 at 4 p.m. ET:

    ARIZONA CARDINALS

    Prominent free agents: OLB John Abraham, OLB Sam Acho, S Chris Clemons, CB Antonio Cromartie, DL Darnell Dockett (released), G Paul Fanaika, ILB Larry Foote, WR Ted Ginn (released), TE Rob Housler, DL Tommy Kelly, NT Dan Williams

    Issues: Arizona has already addressed its cap challenges by redoing WR Larry Fitzgerald’s deal and discarding Dockett’s $6.8 million 2015 salary. But GM Steve Keim is facing a major rebuild of his defensive front seven, which is also still missing suspended ILB Daryl Washington.

    Our advice: Given the challenges of finding effective space eaters, re-signing underrated Williams should probably be atop the priority list. Entice Dockett to return at a reduced rate, then Keim can worry about his linebackers and depth elsewhere. Perhaps he even makes a run at a mid-tier back like Justin Forsett.


    ST. LOUIS RAMS

    Prominent free agents: T Joe Barksdale, WR Kenny Britt, QB Shaun Hill, G Davin Joseph, TE Lance Kendricks, DT Kendall Langford (released)

    Issues: They’re again hoping QB Sam Bradford will be healthy enough to vault them from tough regular-season matchup to tough playoff matchup. Barring that, the Rams need a better plan B QB, must replenish the O-line’s depth and could use help at wideout and corner.

    Our advice: The quarterback market is thin in free agency and the draft. But Hill and Austin Davis weren’t sufficient replacements for Bradford, so making a strong bid for Mark Sanchez or Brian Hoyer this year seems sensible. It shouldn’t cost much to re-sign Britt, whose presence could allow for the patient development of another young receiver assuming one is drafted.

    SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS

    Prominent free agents: CB Chris Cook, CB Perrish Cox, WR Michael Crabtree, CB Chris Culliver, QB Blaine Gabbert, RB Frank Gore, G Mike Iupati, QB Josh Johnson, WR Brandon Lloyd, ST/WR Kassim Osgood, ST/LB Dan Skuta

    Issues: They’re facing a significant exodus of talent while hoping DL Justin Smith returns and ILBs Patrick Willis and NaVorro Bowman can recapture their star form in the aftermath of major injuries. The Niners will also be in the market for a backup to QB Colin Kaepernick yet again.

    Our advice: Iupati is their best free agent, but GM Trent Baalke would probably be wise to allot his limited cap space elsewhere. Keeping the ascending Culliver to address one of the corner spots should probably take precedence. Keeping Gore’s heart and soul at the right price makes sense. But it’s time to part with Crabtree, who’s proven injury-prone but not elite.

    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS

    Prominent free agents: OL James Carpenter, ST/LB Heath Farwell, QB Tarvaris Jackson, OL Lemuel Jeanpierre, S Jeron Johnson, CB Byron Maxwell, TE Tony Moeaki, DE O’Brien Schofield, DT D’Anthony Smith, LB Malcolm Smith, FB Will Tukuafu, DT Kevin Williams

    Issues: GM John Schneider has a nice chunk of cap space, but he’ll need it and might even have to create more. It’s time to pay QB Russell Wilson while giving RB Marshawn Lynch a raise. MLB Bobby Wagner and LT Russell Okung could both hit free agency in 2016. Even restricted free agent WR Jermaine Kearse needs a bump but could also use more help in his position room.

    Our advice: Let’s assume Wilson and Lynch get paid. Given that, Schneider knows he probably can’t afford Maxwell and should probably be targeting affordable help to replace him and add depth to a banged-up Legion of Boom. Jackson and Williams, if he wants to keep playing, are respected vets who should be kept at the right price. Wagner should get priority over Okung, though both may have to wait quite a while. Seattle may face tough decisions on vets like TE Zach Miller and DT Brandon Mebane to make the budget work.

    #19150
    Avatar photoInvaderRam
    Moderator

    I tend to agree with all of that, too, with the exception of Assumption #5, and I am not sold on #3 or #4. I am not so sure that neither Oakland nor San Diego will come up with a stadium plan. St. Louis pulled one out when nobody expected them to.

    I think it is less likely that Oakland will come up with anything because Oakland is working on a new stadium for the A’s right now. I think I read that, anyway. But I would not be surprised by a San Diego solution that is the equivalent to the St. Louis solution.

    While I think the NFL would prefer the Rams to stay put, I think the likelihood of the Carson project unraveling at some point is greater than the Inglewood project unraveling. There are more variables, more ways the Carson project can go wrong. Kroenke’s stadium construction plan stops ONLY if he gets some other opportunity he likes as well i.e. the Broncos. While I have a hard time picturing Kroenke pulling an Al Davis and moving regardless, I also have an equally hard time seeing him settle for less than the vision of the Los Angeles Rams that he has created, drawn up, and planned for. Neither action seems in character for him. He has no history of going rogue, and he has no history of being denied. So either way, we are going to see something new from Kroenke. Remember how he got the Rams? There was Khan coming strong, and talk about cross-ownership impediments, and Kroenke can’t do it, and…BOOM.

    I just think the St. Louis stadium is “settling for less,” and I’m not sure he’s going to be happy with the runner-up proposal when there isn’t anything to stop him from taking first place in the beauty pageant except his own conscience. That biography of Kroenke I posted a few weeks ago portrays a man whose business approach is to make a business goal, and treat it like a fence post. You just keep banging on it, again and again, until you get what you want. He is steady, he is patient, and he is relentless. In the mean time, his stadium project is in the lead in the timeline. We’re at the quarter post, and Kroenke is in the lead by two lengths. Stopping Kroenke, I think, will require a firm and united NFL (if LA is what he truly wants, and all indications are that it is). I am not making a prediction on how this will end, but I will say that if Kroenke gets more than half of the owners – including some rich and powerful ones (and it appears he has Jerry Jones) – I’d be surprised if he takes No for an answer.

    I don’t think they are going to persuade Kroenke. They are going to have to compel Kroenke.

    He is not going to accept the Spanos/Davis LA “solution” as being more appropriate. What? They’re entitled to it cuz their daddies were pioneers, and they have family legacies, and they live closer anyway, and besides, they couldn’t get anything done in their hometowns, so they should get LA.

    Yeah, I don’t think so. The man is a sociopath, and he isn’t going to feel sorry for Dean and Mark, especially now that they are gunking up his business plan. The NFL is either going to have to forcefully stop him by making it too painful for him to move, or bribe him somehow, maybe by some ownership transfers that leave the Rams in St. Louis and Kroenke in LA with a different team.

    i still don’t understand why the league would favor a raiders/chargers move over a rams move. in fact, i’d see every reason to favor the rams move. kroenke would seem to be the more qualified owner. and the other team can always move at a later date and play in kroenke’s stadium.

    plus, the chargers/raiders move depends on BOTH teams actually moving which is far from certain while kroenke seems intent on pushing through with the stadium project. and this is the league’s best opportunity yet to finally have an nfl team back in la. what happens if one of oakland or san diego come up with a stadium plan? the carson site is nixed and los angeles is again without a team. and i’m fairly confident the league does not want that to happen.

    i agree with you. kroenke is a guy who is used to getting what he wants. the league also wants a strong owner in los angeles. spanos and davis don’t strike me as strong owners. at least in the business sense. kroenke might be a sociopath. but he’s a sociopath who gets things done. and that’d be just fine with the league.

    #19147
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I tend to agree with all of that, too, with the exception of Assumption #5, and I am not sold on #3 or #4. I am not so sure that neither Oakland nor San Diego will come up with a stadium plan. St. Louis pulled one out when nobody expected them to.

    I think it is less likely that Oakland will come up with anything because Oakland is working on a new stadium for the A’s right now. I think I read that, anyway. But I would not be surprised by a San Diego solution that is the equivalent to the St. Louis solution.

    While I think the NFL would prefer the Rams to stay put, I think the likelihood of the Carson project unraveling at some point is greater than the Inglewood project unraveling. There are more variables, more ways the Carson project can go wrong. Kroenke’s stadium construction plan stops ONLY if he gets some other opportunity he likes as well i.e. the Broncos. While I have a hard time picturing Kroenke pulling an Al Davis and moving regardless, I also have an equally hard time seeing him settle for less than the vision of the Los Angeles Rams that he has created, drawn up, and planned for. Neither action seems in character for him. He has no history of going rogue, and he has no history of being denied. So either way, we are going to see something new from Kroenke. Remember how he got the Rams? There was Khan coming strong, and talk about cross-ownership impediments, and Kroenke can’t do it, and…BOOM.

    I just think the St. Louis stadium is “settling for less,” and I’m not sure he’s going to be happy with the runner-up proposal when there isn’t anything to stop him from taking first place in the beauty pageant except his own conscience. That biography of Kroenke I posted a few weeks ago portrays a man whose business approach is to make a business goal, and treat it like a fence post. You just keep banging on it, again and again, until you get what you want. He is steady, he is patient, and he is relentless. In the mean time, his stadium project is in the lead in the timeline. We’re at the quarter post, and Kroenke is in the lead by two lengths. Stopping Kroenke, I think, will require a firm and united NFL (if LA is what he truly wants, and all indications are that it is). I am not making a prediction on how this will end, but I will say that if Kroenke gets more than half of the owners – including some rich and powerful ones (and it appears he has Jerry Jones) – I’d be surprised if he takes No for an answer.

    I don’t think they are going to persuade Kroenke. They are going to have to compel Kroenke.

    He is not going to accept the Spanos/Davis LA “solution” as being more appropriate. What? They’re entitled to it cuz their daddies were pioneers, and they have family legacies, and they live closer anyway, and besides, they couldn’t get anything done in their hometowns, so they should get LA.

    Yeah, I don’t think so. The man is a sociopath, and he isn’t going to feel sorry for Dean and Mark, especially now that they are gunking up his business plan. The NFL is either going to have to forcefully stop him by making it too painful for him to move, or bribe him somehow, maybe by some ownership transfers that leave the Rams in St. Louis and Kroenke in LA with a different team.

    #18979
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    ==============================
    The Atlantic
    http://www.theatlantic.com/features/archive/2015/01/life-in-the-sickest-town-in-america/384718/
    Sickest Town in America

    I drove from one of the healthiest counties in the country to the least-healthy, both in the same state. Here’s what I learned about work, well-being, and happiness.

    Olga Khazan

    Donald Rose has no teeth, but that’s not his biggest problem. A camouflage hat droops over his ancient, wire-framed glasses. He’s only 43, but he looks much older.

    I met him one day in October as he sat on a tan metal folding chair in the hallway of Riverview School, one of the few schools—few buildings, really—in the coal-mining town of Grundy, Virginia. That day it was the site of a free clinic, the Remote Area Medical. Rose was there to get new glasses—he’s on Medicare, which doesn’t cover most vision services.

    Remote Area Medical was founded in 1985 by Stan Brock, a 79-year-old Brit who wears a tan Air-Force-style uniform and formerly hosted a nature TV show called Wild Kingdom. Even after he spent time in the wilds of Guyana, Brock came to the conclusion that poor Americans needed access to medical care about as badly as the Guyanese did. Now Remote Area Medical holds 20 or so packed clinics all over the country each year, providing free checkups and services to low-income families who pour in from around the region.

    When I pulled into the school parking lot, someone was sleeping in the small yellow car in the next space, fast-food wrappers spread out on the dashboard. Inside, the clinic’s patrons looked more or less able-bodied. Most of the women were overweight, and the majority of the people I talked to were missing some of their teeth. But they were walking and talking, or shuffling patiently along the beige halls as they waited for their names to be called. There weren’t a lot of crutches and wheelchairs.

    Yet many of the people in the surrounding county, Buchanan, derive their income from Social Security Disability Insurance, the government program for people who are deemed unfit for work because of permanent physical or mental wounds. Along with neighboring counties, Buchanan has one of the highest percentages of adult disability recipients in the nation, according to a 2014 analysis by the Urban Institute’s Stephan Lindner. Nearly 20 percent of the area’s adult residents received government SSDI benefits in 2011, the most recent year Lindner was able to analyze.

    According to Lindner’s calculations, five of the 10 counties that have the most people on disability are in Virginia—and so are four of the lowest, making the state an emblem of how wealth and work determine health and well-being. Six hours to the north, in Arlington, Fairfax, and Loudoun Counties, just one out of every hundred adults draws SSDI benefits. But Buchanan county is home to a shadow economy of maimed workers, eking out a living the only way they can—by joining the nation’s increasingly sizable disability rolls. “On certain days of the month you stay away from the post office,” says Priscilla Harris, a professor who teaches at the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, “because that’s when the disability checks are coming in.”
    But if this place has the scenery of the Belgian Ardennes, it has the health statistics of Bangladesh.

    Just about everyone I spoke with at the Grundy clinic was a former manual worker, or married to one, and most had a story of a bone-crushing accident that had left them (or their spouse) out of work forever. For Rose, who came from the nearby town of Council, that day came in 1996, when he was pinned between two pillars in his job at a sawmill. He suffered through work until 2001, he told me, when he finally started collecting “his check,” as it’s often called. He had to go to a doctor to prove that he was truly hurting—he has deteriorating discs, he says, and chronic back pain. He was turned down twice, he thinks because he was just 30 years old at the time. Now the government sends him a monthly check for $956.

    Each classroom at Riverview School had a different specialist tucked inside—in one, an optometrist measured eyes with her chart projected on the classroom wall. She showed me a picture she took in a nearby town of a man who, unable to afford new glasses and rapidly losing eyesight, had taped a stray plastic lens over his existing glasses. The clinic had brought along two glasses-manufacturing RVs where technicians could make patients like Rose a fresh set of glasses, including frames, in just a few hours.

    As for his teeth? Rose’s diabetes loosened them. “They went ahead and pulled them all,” he said. He assured me that being toothless was not as grave a life-change as the toothed might imagine it to be.

    “I can still eat a steak, trust me,” he says. “I use my tongue and my gums.” … see link for rest of article…

    ================
    top ten, bottom ten
    http://www.well-beingindex.com/alaska-leads-u.s.-states-in-well-being-for-first-time

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 3 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #18965
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    http://theness.com/neurologicablog/index.php/anti-gmo-propaganda/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

    Published by Steven Novella under General Science
    Comments: 1
    There is so much anti-science propaganda out there I often feel like I am emptying the ocean with a spoon. Just today I was faced with an array of choices for my post – should I take on anti-vaccine, anti-GMO, or anti-AGW propaganda? For today, anyway, anti-GMO won. I’ll get to the others eventually.

    This was sent to me by a reader – 5 reasons to avoid GMOs. The content is mostly tired anti-GMO tropes (lies, really) that have been thoroughly debunked, but it is good to address such propaganda in a concise way. Also, it is a useful demonstration of the intellectual dishonesty of the anti-GMO movement. I may not get through all of them today – each one is so densely packed with wrong, and it takes longer to correct a misconception than to create one. Here is point #1 – GMOs are not healthy:

    GMOs are unhealthy: Since the introduction of GMOs in the mid-1990s, the number of food allergies has sky-rocketed, and health issues such as autism, digestive problems and reproductive disorders are on the rise. Animal testing with GMOs has resulted in cases of organ failure, digestive disorders, infertility and accelerated aging. Despite an announcement in 2012 by the American Medical Association stating they saw no reason for labeling genetically modified foods, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine has urged doctors to prescribe non-GMO diets for their patients.

    The author begins with an assumption of causation from correlation. The increase in food allergies actually does not correlate well with the introduction of GMOs. The correlation between organic food and autism is much more impressive. In fact, the organic food industry has been rising steadily over this same time period, and so one could make the even stronger point that organic food causes all the listed ills.

    Food allergies is a particularly bad target for fear mongering, however. There has yet to be a single case of food allergy linked to a GMO. Not one. Further, GMOs are tested for the allergic potential. Allergenic foods have features in common. For example, the proteins that provoke and allergic response are able to survive stomach acids sufficiently intact that they can still produce a reaction. Scientists can therefore test any new proteins against known allergens and look for homology. (The same is true for known toxins.) This, of course, is not an absolute guarantee, but it is a very good safety net, and it has worked so far.

    What about the animal studies? Well, 19 years of animal feeding with GMO has not resulted in any detectable increase in negative health outcomes of livestock. Further, systematic reviews of animal feeding studies have shown no harm. The author here is cherry picking a couple of poor quality outliers. They don’t give specific references, but the same few studies (such as the retracted Seralini study) always crop up on such lists.

    They finish with an odd argument from authority. They mention that the AMA says GMOs are safe, but fail to mention the dozens of other medical and scientific organizations that have also reviewed the evidence and found current GMO crops to be safe. Instead they cherry pick another outlier, an anti-GMO environmental group.

    They increase herbicide use: When Monsanto came up with the idea for Round-up Ready crops, the theory was to make the crops resistant to the pesticide that would normally kill them. This meant the farmers could spray the crops, killing the surrounding weeds and pests without doing any harm to the crops themselves. However, after a number of years have passed, many weeds and pests have themselves become resistant to the spray, and herbicide-use increased (both in amount and strength) by 11% between 1996 and 2011. Which translates to – lots more pesticide residue in our foods – yum!

    The story is more complex than this cartoon. First, the introduction of Bt GMO varieties has clearly reduced the use of insecticide (pesticides include insecticides and herbicides). The introduction of glyphosate resistant crops has increased the use of glyphosate (an herbicide), but decreased the use of other herbicides. Total herbicide use has actually decreased. Further, glyphosate is among the least toxic herbicides, and so the trend has been to replace more toxic herbicides with a less toxic herbicide.

    Therefore, the bottom line conclusion of the author – more pesticides in our food – is the opposite of the truth.

    Herbicide resistant crops has also allowed the reduction in tilling, which harms the soil and releases CO2 into the atmosphere.

    It is true that overreliance on any single strategy for weed control will lead to resistance. This is a generic problem with any strategy that we use. This is a problem of the massive farming needed to feed the world, and is not unique to GMO. Therefore, of course we need to use technology carefully and thoughtfully to optimize sustainability. Some form of integrated pest management is therefore probably a good idea, but this is not incompatible with GMO technology.

    They are everywhere! GMOs make up about 70-80% of our foods in the United States. Most foods that contain GMOs are processed foods. But they also exist in the form of fresh vegetables such as corn on the cob, papaya and squash. The prize for the top two most genetically modified crops in the United States goes to corn and soy. Think about how many foods in your pantry or refrigerator contain corn or its byproducts (high fructose corn syrup) or soy and its byproducts (partially hydrogenated soybean oil).

    So what? GMO are safe to eat. They are good for the environment. I would be happy if 100% of our crops were genetically modified in order to optimize their traits. In fact, 100% of our crops have been extensively genetically modified through breeding over centuries and even millennia. You would hardly recognize the pre-modified versions of the food you eat every day.

    GM technology is faster and more precise. It can also introduce genes from distant branches of life, but again – so what? All life on earth shares a common genetic code and basic biochemistry. We share genes with peas. There is no such thing as a “fish gene” really. There are just genes that are found in fish, most of which are also found in vegetables but some that aren’t. As long as we know what the genes are doing, and test their net effects on the crop, who cares where they came from?

    GM crops don’t ensure larger harvests. As it turns out, GMO crop yields are not as promising as some projections implied. In fact, in some instances, they have been out-yielded by their non-GMO counterparts. This conclusion was reached in a 20 year study carried out by the University of Wisconsin and funded by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Thus negating one of the main arguments in favor of GMOs.

    This is one of those – sort of true, but very misleading – factoids that are common in propaganda. The currently available GM crop traits are not specifically designed to increase yield. They are designed to make yield more predictable, by reducing loss through pests, drought, or disease. Higher yielding traits are in the pipeline, however.

    What about that University of Wisconsin study the author specifically cites (it’s nice when they give a specific reference to check their sources)? It concludes:

    Their analysis, published online in a Nature Biotechnology correspondence article on Feb. 7, confirms the general understanding that the major benefit of genetically modified (GM) corn doesn’t come from increasing yields in average or good years, but from reducing losses during bad ones.

    That’s a little different than what the author implied. It reduces losses in bad years – which mean overall yields are increased. This also only referred to corn. Bt cotton has increased yields by an average of 24%, increasing profit and quality of life for cotton farmers in India.

    A 2014 meta-analysis concluded:

    On average, GM technology adoption has reduced chemical pesticide use by 37%, increased crop yields by 22%, and increased farmer profits by 68%. Yield gains and pesticide reductions are larger for insect-resistant crops than for herbicide-tolerant crops. Yield and profit gains are higher in developing countries than in developed countries.

    Still, anti-GMO activists continue to lie about the data, claiming the exact opposite of what the scientific evidence shows.

    And finally:

    U.S. Labeling suppression: Many of the companies who have an interest in keeping GMOs on the market don’t want you to know which foods contain them. For this reason, they have suppressed recent attempts by states such as California and Washington to require labeling of GMO products. And since they have deep pockets, they were successful – for now. The companies who spent the most on these campaigns are Monsanto (who produces the GMO seeds), and Pepsi, Coca Cola, Nestle and General Mills, who produce some of the most processed foods in existence. Incidentally, most other developed countries such as the nations of the European Union, Japan, Australia, Brazil, and China have mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods. Food for thought!

    They somehow fail to mention that the multi-billion dollar organic food industry lobbies for labeling. But again I say, so what? The fact that there is a political argument about labeling does not directly imply anything about the safety of GMO or whether or not it is a good thing for people and the planet. In fact – that is the very reason that many people (the corporations aside) oppose labeling.

    Mandatory labels imply that there is something for the consumer to worry about. It is a transparent attempt to demonize a safe and effective technology, so that anti-GMO propaganda will have a target. This is also an attempt by a competitor – the organic food industry – to create a negative marketing halo around its competition.

    Conclusion

    This is only a small sampling of the anti-GMO propaganda that is out there. I am all for a vigorous evidence-based discussion about the true risks and benefits of a new technology. This includes how to optimally regulate such technologies. I believe in the need for thoughtful and effective regulations of any technology that has health or environmental impacts. We have seen what happens when an industry, like the supplement industry, is not effectively regulated.

    GMOs are highly regulated. They are the most tested food that we eat. Cultivars that resulting from hybridizing plants and mutation farming, using chemicals or radiation to speed up the process of DNA mutation, are not tested and are even considered organic. This is a double standard, but fine. Let’s test the hell out of GMOs to make sure there are no surprises. This is already happening – and GMOs currently on the market are safe.

    The anti-GMO campaign is largely an anti-science campaign. This one article is not an outlier – it is squarely in the mainstream of anti-GMO rhetoric.

    #18928
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    It’s Brady, yes. But it’s also Belichek.

    This is what the guy does. He prepares his team to prevail. He prepared his offense to beat SEA’s defense. How?

    By having discipline and patience based on a remarkably simple, yet profound key: go vertically. And take a bit at a time. This isn’t talent, nor is it scheme, per se. It’s just seeing the angle to take to beat what the other guy does well.

    That TEAM is ALWAYS ready to maximize its chances of success. ALWAYS.

    People talk about QBs lifting teams. Well, a coach like Belichek raises the ceiling of his team–whatever its talent level–a story or two at all times. He gives them an angle to focus on, calls on them to be patient and trust their preparation, and commands discipline and execution.

    In the NFL, coaches matter more than any 3-4 players. The great coaches get their teams playing competitive, disciplined football at all times, maximizing their capability.

    We’d do well as Ram fans to remember that!

    Well, Belichick is the genius
    on defense,
    and Brady is the brains of the offense,
    and together,
    they really annoy me.

    w
    v

    #18926
    rfl
    Participant

    It’s Brady, yes. But it’s also Belichek.

    This is what the guy does. He prepares his team to prevail. He prepared his offense to beat SEA’s defense. How?

    By having discipline and patience based on a remarkably simple, yet profound key: go vertically. And take a bit at a time. This isn’t talent, nor is it scheme, per se. It’s just seeing the angle to take to beat what the other guy does well.

    That TEAM is ALWAYS ready to maximize its chances of success. ALWAYS.

    People talk about QBs lifting teams. Well, a coach like Belichek raises the ceiling of his team–whatever its talent level–a story or two at all times. He gives them an angle to focus on, calls on them to be patient and trust their preparation, and commands discipline and execution.

    In the NFL, coaches matter more than any 3-4 players. The great coaches get their teams playing competitive, disciplined football at all times, maximizing their capability.

    We’d do well as Ram fans to remember that!

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    #18925
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    A pervasive theme, IMO, is the mental side of the game. Specifically, dealing with the whole risk/reward dynamic.

    Brady is fascinating on this. You HAVE to take chances. And you WILL make mistakes. But be patient, be confident, trust each other and the game plan. And execute when it counts.

    That’s what winning is. A team that does that.

    We gotta a long way to go to get to that level.

    There’s somethin ‘different’ about Brady.
    I dunno what it is, but sometimes
    he just seems like a computer or somethin.
    He seems like the smartest guy on the field.
    Faulk was like that, maybe.

    Do the Rams have anybody even
    close to that now? I dunno.

    w
    v

    #18923
    rfl
    Participant

    A pervasive theme, IMO, is the mental side of the game. Specifically, dealing with the whole risk/reward dynamic.

    Brady is fascinating on this. You HAVE to take chances. And you WILL make mistakes. But be patient, be confident, trust each other and the game plan. And execute when it counts.

    That’s what winning is. A team that does that.

    We gotta a long way to go to get to that level.

    By virtue of the absurd ...

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    =============================
    MMQB
    Peter King
    The Super Bowl Story, According to Tom Brady

    http://mmqb.si.com/2015/02/09/tom-brady-super-bowl-49-nfl/6/

    The Game Plan.

    FULL STORY
    McDaniels: “I didn’t get to see tape on Seattle until about 4 in the afternoon the day after our championship game. The way we do it is, we take care of all our Super Bowl logistical work first, so we can concentrate on game preparation after that without a lot of distractions. I watched a lot of them, obviously.

    And when you saw people have success against them, you saw teams stringing eight or 10 normal successful football plays together. Not explosive plays. But the word that kept coming to my mind, and I must have said it to our offensive players 25 times in two weeks of prep, was ‘patience.’ I told them, ‘Maybe we can come out of the game with one or two big plays. Maybe. But just trust the process.

    Be patient.’ The keys, to me, were being patient and never running horizontally after the catch. Just go upfield. You’re not going to create yards by trying to get around one guy, because two guys will be waiting for you. We did so many catch-and-run drills during the week of practice. Vertical, vertical, vertical. For Tom, the key was: Do not hold the ball for four seconds, or bad things are gonna happen.”

    Brady: “I watched a lot of tape. A lot.”

    He watched the Seahawks’ NFC Championship Game three times.

    Brady: “They’d allowed the fewest big plays of any team all season, and you saw pretty early why you don’t want to go into the Super Bowl throwing up a bunch of posts, a bunch of ‘nine’ routes. [‘Go’ routes.] Richard Sherman picks off the go route every time you throw it. The plan was to exploit other parts of the field—but short parts of the field. Michael Bennett rushes from everywhere. Cliff Avril kills people. They believe in what they do. We countered that by saying, ‘Okay, here’s what we’re pretty good at: Space the field, find the soft spots, be satisfied with the four-yard gain, be happy with the four-yard gain. We were gonna be happy with a two-yard gain.”
    Ball Security.

    McDaniels: “The thing nobody talks about with Seattle is their ability to create disruptive plays. We worked on that literally every day, and in our six or seven practices before the game. Ball security. How to run after the catch. We told the scout team guys to punch, strip, whack at the ball, all the time. I knew every time we would have the ball in space, they’d be chopping at it. And that’s exactly what happened in the game. In fact, I have this thing I do during the first half of our games. I write down on my play sheet what I want to talk about to the team at halftime. And after seeing this five, six, seven times in the first half, I wrote down: ‘Constantly stripping at the ball.’ And we talked to them about it again at halftime.”

    In 72 offensive plays in Super Bowl XLIX, New England did not fumble.

    (Gregory Payan/AP)Josh McDaniels and Tom Brady have both been a part of all four of the Patriots’ Super Bowl titles. (Gregory Payan/AP)
    The First Drive.

    Seattle led 24-14 early in the fourth quarter. After an eight-yard Bruce Irvin sack, New England had second-and-18 with 11:30 to play at the Patriots’ 24.

    In the regular season, Brady was among the most deliberate quarterbacks in the league in getting rid of the ball, at 2.39 seconds per pass drop, according to Pro Football Focus. On second down he took 1.01 seconds to dump a slip-screen to Brandon LaFell on the right side. Gain of four. Third and 14.

    Brady: “Would this have been a four-down situation here? I don’t know. The way it worked, Sherman had Gronkowski. Danny had a deeper incut. He was the go-to guy, but they squeezed him on defense, so I couldn’t go there. Now LaFell … He had a deep comeback. When you wait for a guy—what does he run the 40 in, and what can he run 25 yards in? Maybe 2.8 seconds, three seconds? You have to wait for him. So their rush sort of ran past me, and I moved up in the pocket. As a quarterback, you start to feel the rhythm of the pass-rush as the game goes on; your body develops a cadence. You feel what they’re doing. Russell Wilson, he doesn’t care—he can outrun them. I can’t. So I have to make the calculated decision. I had the ball quite a while there.

    Me: “Well, 3.48 seconds, to be exact.”

    Brady: “Probably the longest time I had all game. Julian was the last option I had on the play, and there he was, in the middle.”

    Edelman caught it, bounced off Kam Chancellor, and gained 21.

    New life. First down in the flat to Vereen (1.76 seconds), with an extra 15 tacked on because of a late hit by Earl Thomas.

    New Goal: Three-Hawks

    No team in the salary-cap era has ever been to three consecutive Super Bowls. With the majority of its talent coming back and the motivation after its Arizona disappointment, Seattle has more than a legitimate chance to become the first, Greg Bedard writes.

    FULL STORY
    Brady: “We knew Shane needed to play a big role in the game. The halfback would be critical against an All-Pro secondary because you’re not going to target Sherman 12 times, Chancellor 12 times. The big challenge for him was to catch it and make yards, while at least one of their guys was going for the strip. They killed the Broncos last year with that in the Super Bowl.”

    Now incomplete into the end zone for LaFell, trying to take advantage of the matchup against backup corner Tharold Simon. Then Vereen over the right side for two.

    Third-and-eight, 8:46 to go. Four-down territory now?

    Brady: “We had two guys running opposite seams, Gronk and LaFell. Both safeties had vision on that. Julian’s route was supposed to be four yards. This was identical to a play we ran [against Seattle] in 2012. I hit Wes Welker. They played that same coverage against Welker in 2012, with a lineman dropping back on him in coverage in the short middle, and I hit him. I watched a lot of tape—our game with them from two years ago three times, Dallas this year multiple times, their championship game against Green Bay three times. I’m always trying to match the perfect amount of physical preparation with the right mental preparation. And I’m 37, I’ve got to get a lot of rest. I am a person that relies on my sleep. Anyway, that is what makes my relationship with Josh so special, because I feel at this point we’ve been together so long and we know each other so well and we’re so synchronized. This game, awesome. This play was an example of that. He knew it would work. He knew Julian would be there for me, and he was. Watching that tape, I saw it from a couple of years ago—and Josh saw it too.”

    Dump to Edelman. Gain of 21.

    First-and-goal, Seattle 4-yard line, 8:04 left. Plenty of time.

    Now, for the only time in his last 18 plays, Brady errs. Edelman runs a quick fake post on Simon, pirouettes to the left, leaving Simon in the dust, and turns to Brady—who throws a line drive too high. Too hard, and too high. But a lesson to him. And a lesson to McDaniels.

    Brady: “There’s a mental part to a football throw and a physical part. The mental part is being decisive. Every throw is risk-reward. When you’ve played for 15 years, you have what I call ‘no-fear throws.’ Josh calls them that too. You’re confident, you know you’ve got it, and you just rip it. Some other throws, just before you let the ball go, you’re still not quite convinced that’s what you want to do. It comes right off your last fingertip, and you’re just not convinced. I admire Andrew Luck; he is so decisive for a guy who is so young. Aaron Rodgers, same thing. But this throw, the last thing I wanted to do was throw it to the other guy. Just as I let it go, I caught a glimpse of the DB [Simon]. He’s looking at me, I’m looking at him, as I let it go, it was a mental mistake, I got indecisive. My fault. I have had so many plays where I have made bad plays and I say, ‘I ain’t never doing that again.’ Josh has done such a good job trying to break down the mental blocks. Some of those decisions go right up to the time before the ball leaves your fingertips. On that one, it was, like, yes yes yes, NO! On my two interceptions in the game, the first one I should have called time because I just didn’t like what I saw, and then it was too late when I made the throw. Dumb throw. The second one, Bobby Wagner made a phenomenal play. He read my eyes. He got me. If I ever play those guys again, I will not lead Bobby Wagner anywhere with my eyes.”

    McDaniels: “Tom learns from everything, and he doesn’t let it bother him. What happened next was Tom took advantage of Earl [Thomas] not being quite as aggressive as he could have been. And Danny Amendola played the back of the end zone perfectly. Tommy knows, in the tight red area, you always have to err away from the defender.”

    Thomas and Amendola were on the end line, Thomas to Amendola’s right, and Brady threw hard to the outside of Amendola, away from Thomas. Touchdown. Seattle 24-21.

    Brady: “Earl was indecisive, thank God.”

    Brady wasn’t. And he wouldn’t be on the next drive either. He would have a long memory, as would McDaniels.
    (Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)Danny Amendola finished with five catches for 47 yards and a touchdown. (Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)
    The Second Drive.

    Before the drive started, McDaniels said to Brady: “I got some things I’m gonna go with. I’m gonna pull ’em from everywhere.”

    In the huddle to start the series, Brady, as heard on Showtime’s “Inside the NFL” show, told his team: “We need a big championship drive! That’s what we need!”

    First down at the New England 36 after a short Jon Ryan punt … 6:52 to play, Seattle 24, New England 21.

    • Brady to Vereen, one-handed catch. Gain of eight.
    • Brady to Vereen in the left flat. Gain of four.
    • Edelman, in motion to the left, grabs a quick dump-off from Brady. Gain of nine.
    • After a pass-interference call on Amendola, Gronkowski beats Chancellor on a shallow cross. Gain of 20.
    • Brady to Vereen, right flat, Sherman sniffs it out. No gain.

    Second-and-10 at the Seattle 32, 4:05 to play. Field-goal range. But no settling now.

    Brady: “So K.J. Wright walks up to Gronk. We know it’s man. Same coverage Wright had on the touchdown pass to Gronk earlier. So if you’re K.J. Wright, you’re thinking, ‘I don’t want to get beat on a TD pass again,’ and he plays him high. Gronk sells the go route, and runs the stop route. Gronk knew it. Later, he told me, ‘As soon as the ball was snapped, I knew you were throwing it to me.’ Gronk’s a tough matchup. I’ve seen it for a long time. You put two guys on him, we got three wideouts single-covered. We’ll win those, somewhere. Big fast, unbelievable hands. He’s got vacuum hands.”

    Vereen on a quick snap, up the middle for seven. Seattle was tiring now. This was the 15th round of a 15-round donnybrook, and the Seahawks were on the ropes. Brady to LaFell—with no one covering him—for seven. Blount up the middle for two.

    New England ball at the Seattle 3-yard line, 2:06 left.

    Remember six minutes ago? New England ball at the Seattle 4-yard line?

    McDaniels: “It wasn’t very complicated.”
    (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)Julian Edelman’s fourth-quarter score capped a nine-catch, 109-yard day. (Christian Petersen/Getty Images)

    Brady: “After the last drive, I went to the sidelines and told Josh, ‘Josh, come back to that call. Please come back to that call.’ I knew even before the call came in what it was going to be. I knew how it was going to play out. Earl in same place. Simon in same spot. Only this time, they ended up blitzing, really a max blitz, creating one-on-one with Jules. He ran a great route. It’s a tough route to cover. The cornerback has no help. Looks like a slant. How do you not respect the coverage on the slant?’’

    Edelman pushed off Simon, mildly, on the slant, then pirouetted again, just like last time. Only this time the throw wasn’t 115 miles an hour, and it wasn’t high. It was thrown medium speed, and right to Edelman.

    Touchdown. New England 28, Seattle 24.

    Immediately, McDaniels pointed at Brady. The NFL Films cameras captured Brady pointing at McDaniels. The message from each man was simple.

    McDaniels: You executed the play exactly how it should have been done.

    Brady: You trusted me on the same play again—and this time I didn’t let you down!

    In the span of 10 minutes, Brady took the Patriots 76 yards in eight plays (after the Irvin sack), then 64 yards in 10 plays. He completed 13 of 15 passes. He’s had some good Super Bowl quarters in his three previous wins, but none like this one. None under this pressure, against a defense this good (though wounded, without Avril down the stretch) and with so much on the line.
    The End.
    (David L. Ryan/Getty Images)Brady (David L. Ryan/Getty Images)

    Brady: “I haven’t thought about that yet—two touchdowns in that short a time against them. I felt good that we got the lead. I was THE reason we lost the lead. I felt like my teammates can count on me. I felt satisfied I overcame those two interceptions. I never want to be the reason why we lose.

    “They trust me with the ball. All the hopes we had coming in … When you throw it 50 times, the team is saying, ‘We trust you with the ball.’ But I have to give credit to so many other guys. The emotional energy you put into games like this, the physical energy. The game is 30 percent longer, 40 percent longer because of the long pre-game and the long halftime. First time we played in 70-degree weather in two months. Football is such a game of attrition, never more than in the Super Bowl.”

    McDaniels: “It’s one of the best examples of what we talk about so much—we identify how we want to play an opponent, and then we design a game plan to do that, and it might be the exact opposite of the game plan we had the previous game. But we give it to the players. We told them in this case to stay patient and not panic, and to practice the way we planned. It was an incredible example of the harmony between the players and the staff, and to Bill’s leadership making it all work, and the players buying into it, and just believing. Believing in the plan is so important, and they believed—never more than this game.”

    Brady: “I had a nice moment with my wife Tuesday morning. Monday was taken up with getting home, and I finally had a chance to sleep Monday night … We woke up Tuesday, and, now, she’s woken up twice next to me after Super Bowl losses, and [for those] I was like, ‘The game’s today, right? What I just had was a nightmare, right? That didn’t really happen, right?’ And this time, I just looked at her and it was, it was …”

    Pause. Three, four seconds.

    Me: “What happened? What’d you say?”

    Brady: “It was just special. Just pretty special.”

    (Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)The Falcons went 6-10 in 2013-14 at the Georgia Dome, where they’re accused of piping in artificial crowd noise. (Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)
    On all the cheating

    One of the most important things facing Roger Goodell this offseason (you mean there’s more?) is to clear the police blotter of the nagging cheating scandals/problems that have surfaced in the last couple of months.

    New England is cooperating with the investigation by Ted Wells and Jeff Pash into allegations brought by Indianapolis GM Ryan Grigson that one or more footballs the Patriots used in the AFC title game were significantly underinflated. There’s no timetable for the investigation, but I wouldn’t think a decision is imminent; it took Wells 14 weeks to finish his probe into the Miami bullying scandal, and he’s been on the job here only two-and-a-half weeks.

    Atlanta owner Arthur Blank told the Associated Press he expects the team will be found guilty of some wrongdoing in connection with fake crowd noise pumped into the Georgia Dome over the past two seasons. “I think what we’ve done in 2013 and 2014 was wrong,” Blank said last week, implicitly acknowledging a violation. “Anything that affects the competitive balance and fairness on the field, we’re opposed to, as a league, as a club and as an owner. It’s obviously embarrassing. But beyond embarrassing, it doesn’t represent our culture.” Some good it did. The Falcons were 3-5 at home in 2013, and 3-5 at home last season. The league could fine the Falcons or dock the team a draft choice or choices. Expect a decision as soon as this week.

    Cleveland is expecting a decision soon, too, that could be harsher for the franchise than the punishment for Atlanta. GM Ray Farmer stands accused of illegally communicating via text message with coaches and in-game staffers. The NFL bans that kind of communication during games because of the potential advantage that could be gained from electronic messages from outside sources. According to Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer, Farmer could be fined and suspended, and draft choices taken from the team, if the investigation finds he texted coaches during games. Quite a week for the Browns, who also saw a spokesman for potential starting quarterback Johnny Manziel announce that Manziel was in rehab for a substance-abuse problem. The NFL also announced a one-year suspension (minimum) for wide receiver Josh Gordon for violating the league’s substance-abuse policy. It never showers in Cleveland. It only pours torrentially.

    Jerry Rice … Now, this is a strange one. Rice, clearly defending Joe Montana as comparisons between Montana and Tom Brady mount, has been critical of the Patriots for cheating. (Join the outside-of-six-northeastern-states club.) Now comes Rice’s admission, on an ESPN feature in January, that he used Stickum during his NFL career on his already-tacky gloves. Stickum was banned by the league in 1981, and Rice’s NFL career began in 1985. As he said in the ESPN piece: “I know this might be a little illegal, guys, but you put a little spray, a little Stickum on [the gloves] to make sure that texture is a little sticky.”

    I’m not one to indict the entire business for the acts of a few. I am also not one to dismiss rule-breakers, even if those in the game say everyone’s doing something or other. Goodell needs to be sure there are teeth in all his sanctions, preferably involving draft picks, to be sure teams aren’t tempted to cheat in any way in the future.

    And one more thing: Rice should tell us which cheating is allowable and which is reprehensible, since he knows so well.

    * * *
    (Larry French/Getty Images)Darren Sharper’s 14-year career ended in New Orleans in 2010. (Larry French/Getty Images)
    On Darren Sharper

    I mentioned in this column last week that former Green Bay and New Orleans safety Darren Sharper would be eligible for the Pro Football Hall of Fame for the first time in 2016, along with Brett Favre, Terrell Owens and Alan Faneca. I wrote those four would be leading candidates to be finalists in 2016 and said of the four players: “Pretty thin at the top, but two premier guys.” Meaning Favre and Owens.

    Sharper stands accused of serial sexual assault in California, Arizona and Louisiana, in some cases by using drugs on the women he attacked.

    So some media people, and quite a few fans, picked up on my note, and the reaction was intense: How can you consider a man sitting in jail, accused of drugging multiple women and raping them, for the Pro Football Hall of Fame? I wish it had been that civil. But of course it wasn’t.

    I understand the emotion involved in a case like this. The crimes are deplorable and reprehensible, and if true, Sharper should be imprisoned for a very long time. And it became very clear to me last week that fans want Sharper nowhere near the Pro Football Hall of Fame, ever. To even consider him should be cause for the 46 voting members of the Hall to first be dismissed from the committee and secondly to have their heads examined.

    To clarify the way the Pro Football Hall of Fame works, we have a bylaw that says we can consider only football-related factors in determining a candidate’s worthiness for election. For example, when Lawrence Taylor was up for election 16 years ago, we were allowed to consider the fact that Taylor missed four games once for a drug suspension, but we weren’t allowed to consider his drug use or his other off-field transgressions, of which there were many. I can’t tell you whether some voters considered the other things; I can just tell you that I considered Taylor as a football player only. He was enshrined on his first season of eligibility, 1999.

    Talk Back
    Have a question or comment for Peter King? Email him at talkback@themmqb.com and it might be included in Tuesday’s mailbag.
    Maybe you would say: If a candidate is convicted of a felony, he cannot get into the Hall of Fame. Leaving the scene of an accident is a felony. Arson is a felony. Selling drugs is a felony. Animal cruelty is a felony. Should those crimes be enough to automatically eliminate a candidate?

    Maybe you would say: Don’t complicate things! It’s obvious that a very serious crime, such as murder or rape, should bar a candidate from the Hall. Obvious to whom? There are 46 voters for the Hall of Fame. Do you want to leave it up to the conscience of each individual voter as to what constitutes a crime serious enough to ban a person from the Hall?

    I don’t. The voters for the Hall of Fame should consider what a player did on the field, and the influences of a coach on the game and how many games he won, and the contributions that other figures have made to the sport. Beyond that, the slope is far too slippery.

    I plan to devote my Tuesday column—barring some major NFL development pushing this issue aside—to your email on the subject. Send them here, and I’ll pick a handful. Thanks in advance for your interaction.

    * * *
    On the passing of Dean Smith

    One of my fondest memories as a sportswriter came early in my career, as a 25-year-old college basketball writer for the Cincinnati Enquirer in 1982. On a late March Monday night in the Superdome, I was in the second row of the press area, even with the foul line at the basket where North Carolina was shooting, when 19-year-old UNC freshman Michael Jordan took a pass at the left wing. Georgetown led 62-61. Jordan was about 16 feet from the basket, not closely covered, and he rose to take a jump shot. It was perfect. North Carolina won the game, 63-62. That night was the first of many legendary baskets in huge games by Jordan.
    Michael Jordan and Dean Smith, in 2007 (Grant Halverson/Getty Images)Michael Jordan and Dean Smith, in 2007 (Grant Halverson/Getty Images)

    The cool part of the story came the next morning. In those days, the media’s access to teams wasn’t as tightly controlled as it is today (I am assuming it’s the same after a Final Four as for a big NFL playoff game). And a few reporters, including me, learned the North Carolina team would be leaving the next morning, pretty early, on the plane back to Chapel Hill. So a few of us went out to the airport. Not much security then; we went right out to an outer tarmac, where the players were waiting to board the flight home. I talked to James Worthy for a couple of minutes, and then saw Matt Doherty, another one of the players, and went up to speak to him. It was early, and I assumed most of the guys had been up much of the night celebrating. No matter. They had to get home. “Dean,” one of the North Carolina staffers told me, “wants his players back on campus for afternoon classes. If they’ve got a Tuesday afternoon class, he wants them there.”

    Doherty talked about the exhilaration of the win. I looked over to the side, and there was Jordan, with a packed gym bag slung over his shoulder, wearing a coat and tie, as all traveling Tar Heels did. He was also carrying a film projector in his right hand, and a few canisters of film (this was in the pre-video days) in the other hand. I asked Doherty, “What’s Jordan doing with that film projector?”

    “The freshman always carry the film and the film projector,” Doherty said.

    Coat and tie. Back for Tuesday afternoon classes. Freshmen, regardless of their greatness, earning their stripes. That’s what I thought of Sunday, when I heard Dean Smith had died at 83.

    Quotes of the Week

    I

    “Other than my parents, no one had a bigger influence on my life than coach Smith.”

    —Michael Jordan, on the passing of Dean Smith.

    II

    “Look fellas, it’s the same thing we talked about in the Baltimore game. We just need everyone to do their job! All right? There are no new plays. We have to contain the quarterback and get to his level. We’re getting high-armed because we’re not playing with our hands. We have to step up and challenge the line of scrimmage. We have to wrap [Marshawn] Lynch up. We have to do a good job in our man-to-man coverage. There is no mystery here, fellas. It’s trusting each other and everybody doing their job!”

    —New England coach Bill Belichick, to his defensive players, gathered on the bench in the second half of the Super Bowl, imploring them to remember their fundamentals, on Showtime’s “Inside the NFL” program, in a similar rant to those he’s given his defenses for years.

    III

    Part 1

    “You gave me the best year of my life!”

    —Julian Edelman, to Bill Belichick, on the field after the Patriots won the Super Bowl, as captured by NFL Films and aired on “Inside the NFL.”

    Part 2

    “You know what? You guys went out there and won it. It’s a players’ game.”

    —Belichick, to Edelman, via NFL Films.

    Part 3

    “I’d do anything for you, coach.”

    —Edelman, to Belichick, via NFL Films.

    IV

    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    La’el Collins’ NFL Draft Breakdown

    By
    John Owning

    on
    December 12, 2014

    The quarterback is the most important player on any team. He is the player whose performance on the field has the biggest bearing on the result of a game; therefore, the players assigned to protect the quarterback are vital as well.

    This is why there is such a high premium placed on left tackles as they protect a right-handed quarterback’s blindside and generally face the best pass-rushers in the NFL, even though it is becoming more common for teams to place their best rusher on the right to create a mismatch.

    However, It is exceedingly difficult to find quality offensive linemen, especially left tackles. One reason is “the planet theory” or that there are only so many people on the planet that are big enough and skilled enough to play offensive line at a high level in the NFL. It takes an enormous amount of skill and technique to be able to succeed in the trenches as an offensive lineman.

    On nearly every single play, an offensive lineman is at an athletic deficit as defensive linemen may be the most athletic players in the NFL given their size. The only way for an offensive lineman to compensate for this deficit in athleticism is to master the techniques and nuances of offensive line play.

    One of the top prospects in the 2015 NFL Draft who hopes to fill that scarcity of quality offensive tackles in the NFL is LSU offensive tackle La’el Collins who just won the coveted SEC Jacobs Blocking trophy for being the best offensive lineman in the SEC. Collins is a massive man as he is listed at 6-foot-5 and 321 pounds with what appears to be long arms.

    Collins has been extremely productive, as he has had 219 knockdowns in 2,482 career snaps. This means he knocks down an opposing defender on 11.3 percent or one out of every 11 snaps he is on the field, which is a truly staggering number.

    Despite that fact, it is impossible to tell how good an offensive lineman is based on stats since there are just not many of them out there.

    Therefore, let’s take a look Collins’ tape and see if he deserves the label of a first-round pick.

    Collins’ first trait that jumps out on film is his initial punch. Collins may have the strongest punch out of the entire draft-eligible offensive lineman in the draft. The purpose of an initial punch is to redirect or severely limit the defensive lineman’s force or momentum.

    This play is a great example of La’el’s great punch:

    Collins is lined up at the left tackle with a tight end to his left with a defensive end slightly shaded to his outside. After the ball is snapped, Collins takes a 45-degree lead step to his left. He remains balanced as he moves to his left with his hand cocked and ready to fire. He then fires his hands inside, which jolts the defensive end’s pads and creates a ton of movement at the line of scrimmage. He gets great arm extension and pushes the defensive end back two yards with his punch alone.

    The ability to create this much movement with his punch alone is extremely rare among offensive lineman in today’s game. Last year, Greg Robinson was able to create movement with his punch alone and Collins follow in his footsteps with this exceptional trait this year. When offensive linemen can create movement like the play above, it leads to huge holes that any running back can run through.

    The next trait that Collins exemplifies is leg drive. Once an offensive lineman engages at the point of attack with a defender they must keep their feet moving to generate the necessary amount of force to move the opposing defender. In a base drive or “power” block, an offensive lineman’s first step his his lead step, while his second is his attack step, which engages him with the defender. The only way for the offensive lineman to finish the block is to keep his feet moving through the contact or all his prior steps and punch will be wasted.

    Here is a great example of Collins’ great leg drive:

    Once again, Collins is lined up at left tackle with a tight end to his left. However, this time Dante Fowler, one of the best defensive ends in college football, is lined up shaded to his outside. After the snap, Collins takes a slight lead step with his left foot followed by an attack step with his right foot. Fowler does a great job getting off the ball quickly, which limits Collins’ ability to get a good initial punch. This initially causes a stalemate at the line of scrimmage. However, Collins drives his feet at the point of attack, while Fowler doesn’t, which allows him create a ton of movement as he pushes Fowler four yards off the line of scrimmage.

    Collins’ strength, punch and leg drive allow him to dominate in drive or power blocks in a man-blocking scheme. However, it also manifests itself when he performs zone blocks as well. While La’el does a better job of moving vertically in the run game, he displays enough lateral mobility and foot speed to execute blocks on any outside zone or stretch plays.

    Here is an example of Collins’ performing a reach block on an outside zone run:

    Collins is at the left tackle position with a tight end to his left and in a three-point stance as a defensive end is lined up head up on him. After the snap, he executes a slide step to his left, which allows him to gain leverage on the defensive end. Then, he does a great job of getting his outside hand on the outside number of the defensive end with his punch that jolts the defender. He does an excellent job of driving his feet through the contact and turning the defender to give his running back a clear lane to run through.

    Collins not only does great work at dominating opposing defenders at the line of scrimmage, but he is surprisingly adept at blocking in space for someone his size. Most massive offensive linemen look awkward moving in space, but Collins looks relatively smooth when you compare him with them. Collins doesn’t move as smoothly as some of the smaller, athletic tackles like Ty Sambrailo, but he is smooth enough to get the job done. Collins shows great mental processing in space as well. He does a great job of deciphering where and who to block in space and the best way to do it.

    This is a great example of Collins working to the second level and blocking in space:

    Collins is again at the left tackle position with a tight end to his left; however, on this play he is not covered by a defensive lineman. After the snap, the Collins takes a lead step with his right foot to perform a combination block on the defensive tackle with the left guard. As the seal blocker, his job is to hit the defender, so that the guard can perform his block, and to work to the second level and block the weak-side linebacker. Collins comes down and gets a great push, which knocks the defensive tackle down and basically eliminates him from the play. Collins then works to the second level and turns his head toward the linebacker on the weak side. Collins gets in range and performs a powerful punch that jolts the linebacker back a yard and give the running back room to get a sizable gain.

    Collins has shown all the traits to be a dominant run-blocker in the NFL. However, offensive tackles in the NFL aren’t paid to be run-blockers, they are paid to be great in pass protection. While Collins thrives in run blocking, he is no slouch in pass protection either.

    Collins does a good job of getting out of his stance and into his pass set where he can mirror defenders extremely well. In the SEC, he has faced a number of premier edge rushers, like Alvin “Bud” Dupree, Dante Fowler and Preston Smith, and he has done exceptionally well.

    This play showcases Collins’ ability to mirror his opponents:

    On this play, La’el is lined up at the left tackle in a two-point stance with Dante Fowler lined up as an outside linebacker opposite him. After the snap, Collins does a fantastic job of pushing off his inside foot and into his kick slide as Fowler explodes of the ball. Collins stays balanced in his kick slide and doesn’t give Fowler a decent route to the quarterback. He stays patient and executes a great punch, which eliminates any opportunity for Fowler to generate pressure.

    Even though the above play was a quick pass, it still shows the traits that allow Collins to thrive in pass protection. He gets into his kick slide quickly and balanced and stays square to the line of scrimmage so that Fowler doesn’t have an opportunity for an inside counter move.

    The last trait that makes Collins an exemplary offensive tackle prospect is his strong hands. Once he gets his hands on defenders its over, as it is extremely difficult to disengage off Collins’ strong grips.

    This play showcases Collins’ strong hands:

    LSU is lined up in an unbalanced left formation. Therefore, Collins is lined as the left tackle with one tackle and a tight end to his left (he is the second person from the left of the center). After the snap, Collins performs a soft kick slide as he pushes off his inside foot and takes a short jab step backwards at a 45-degree angle to his left. Once Alvin Dupree (No. 2) gets in range, Collins shoots his hands inside and grabs Dupree’s breastplate. Dupree tries as hard as he can to disengage off Collins, but he can’t, which results in Dupree flailing around as Collins easily controls him.

    While Collins is an upper-echelon tackle prospect, he does have one fundamental flaw in his game that he will need to fix. The one area where Collins doesn’t make his blocks or where he gets beat are where he overextends or gets his weight over his toes. This leads to Collins losing balance and ending up on the ground far too often.

    Here is an example of Collins overextending:

    f

    Collins is again lined up at the left tackle position with a tight end to his left. After the snap, Collins takes a slide step to his left to try to perform a get to the outside of the defensive end and turn him. However, Collins lunges at the defensive end and gets his pads over his toes, which allows the defensive end to easily execute a swim move over Collins who gets completely off balanced and falls to the ground.

    Collins first punch is so good that sometimes he gets too eager to fire it off at defender, which causes him to lunge and loose his balance. If Collins overextends at the next level, he will get beat badly by the elite pass rushers he will face.

    Overall, Collins’ skill set best fits on a team that employs a power-running scheme where Collins can fire off the ball, move forward and dominate his man. Nevertheless, Collins has the ability to do a great job for a team that uses a zone-blocking scheme, but it would be utilizing him to the best of his ability. Collins would best be served as a right tackle initially as he cleans up some of his flaws in year one; before he is moved over to the left tackle position in year two or three just like the Dallas Cowboys did with Tyron Smith.

    In a league that is in desperate need of quality offensive lineman, La’el Collins may be the first one off the board when April 30th rolls around.

    Projection: Round 1

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.
    • This reply was modified 10 years, 4 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I disagree about the lie being central to that movie.

    His views of the war were valid to HIM. That’s all that mattered in this film, IMO.

    The film completely allows the lie to dictate the narrative. It does not question it and in fact does everything to support it. Again, if it DIDN’T, his whole story would look different. Like, COMPLETELY different.

    And it is honestly really easy to have put his ideas in context and show that they were not true. A 30 second scene would do it. Also, NOT having the enemy be Al qaida in Falluja would do it too.

    Speaking of info being all around us, people should read the real story of Fallujah. Once you do that you realize the film is a complete and total collaborator in the revisionist take on the war. For one thing, the insurgents there had nothing bloody to do with Al Qaida — they were Iraqi sunni insurgents associated with the old regime.

    There was no bloody way on earth that film was going to show a realistic version of Fallujah. It was revisionist in every single frame. And badly so. Like way out of its way from the truth and deep into falsehoods.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallujah_during_the_Iraq_War
    2003 invasion of Iraq
    Downtown Fallujah, December 2003

    Although the majority of the residents were Sunni and had supported Saddam Hussein’s rule, Fallujah lacked military presence just after his fall. There was little looting and the new mayor of the city—Taha Bidaywi Hamed, was selected by local tribal leaders—was pro-United States.[4] When the U.S. Army’s 1st Battalion / 2nd Brigade 82nd Airborne entered the town on April 23, 2003, they positioned themselves at the vacated Ba’ath Party headquarters, a local school house, and the Ba’ath party resort just outside town (Dreamland)—the US bases inside the town erased some goodwill, especially when many in the city had been hoping the US Army would stay outside of the relatively calm city.

    Instability, April 2003 – March 2004
    Main article: Fallujah killings of April 2003

    On the evening of April 28, 2003, several hundred residents defied the US curfew and marched down the streets of Fallujah, past the soldiers positioned in the Ba’ath party (which did not exist any more at that point) headquarters, to protest the military presence inside the local school. The protest remained peaceful but US soldiers fired upon the crowd, killing as many as 17 and wounding more than 70 of the protesters. US soldiers alleged that they were returning fire, but protesters stated they were unarmed.[5][6][7] Independent observers from human rights group found no evidence that US forces had come under attack.[1] The US suffered no casualties from the incident.

    Two days later, on April 30, the 82d Airborne was replaced in the city by 2nd Troop (Fox) / U.S. 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment. The 3rd Cavalry was significantly smaller in number and chose not to occupy the same schoolhouse where the shooting had occurred two days earlier. However, on the same day a daytime protest in front of the Ba’ath party headquarters and mayor’s office (which are adjacent to one another) led to the death of three more protesters. At this point in time the 3rd Cavalry was in control of the entire Al Anbar province, and it quickly became evident that a larger force was needed. The now battalion-sized element of the 3rd Cavalry (2nd squadron) in Fallujah was replaced by the 2nd Brigade of the 3rd Infantry Division.[citation needed]

    During the summer, the US army decided to close down its last remaining base inside the city (the Ba’ath party headquarters; FOB Laurie). At this point the 3d ACR had all of its forces stationed outside Fallujah in the former Baathist resort, Dreamland. After the May 11 surrender of the Mujahedin-e-Khalq, the incoming 3d Infantry Division also began using the large MEK compound adjacent to Dreamland to accommodate its larger troop presence in Fallujah. Under its control, the 3d Infantry Division maintained no bases inside the city of Fallujah.

    On 30 June a “huge explosion” occurred in a mosque in which the imam, Sheikh Laith Khalil, and eight other people were killed. Residents of the city claim the army fired a missile at the mosque while the army displayed evidence that a terrorist bomb training class had gone wrong.[8] Just a couple of days earlier things had been much quieter, although US troops had been confiscating motorbikes as a preventive measure against terrorist attacks.[9]
    Timeline showing the sequence of units in control of Fallujah in just the first year of the war

    Just 2 months after the 3rd Infantry had taken control of Fallujah from the 3rd Cavalry, the entire 3rd Infantry Division was redeployed home. The 3d Cavalry was once again put in control of Fallujah, and again was only able to devote one squadron to Fallujah. Attached to that Squadron was the 115th MP Company from Rhode Island. Unarmored and ill-equipped the 115th MPs kept order with routine patrols and frequent house raids searching for insurgents and weapons caches. In September 2003, the 3rd Brigade of the 82nd Airborne was deployed to replace the 3d Cavalry in Ramadi and Fallujah. The 3rd Cavalry was then left to control all of the al-Anbar province except for these two cities.

    Approximately one year after the invasion, the city’s Iraqi police and Iraqi Civil Defense Corps were unable to establish law and order. Insurgents launched many indiscriminate attacks and some on police stations in the city, killing at least 20 police officers. Beginning in early March 2004, the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division commanded by Major-General Charles H. Swannack Jr. gave a transfer of authority of the al-Anbar province to the I Marine Expeditionary Force commanded by Lt. General Conway. The 3rd Cavalry and the 3rd Brigade of the 82nd Airborne were then sent home.
    Attack on contractors

    Main article: 2004 Fallujah ambush

    On March 31, 2004 – Iraqi insurgents from the Brigades of Martyr Ahmed Yassin in Fallujah ambushed a convoy containing four American private military contractors (mercenaries) employed by Blackwater USA, who were at the time guarding a convoy carrying kitchen supplies to a military base, for the catering company Eurest Support Services[10]

    The four contractors, Scott Helvenston, Jerko Zovko, Wesley Batalona and Michael Teague, were dragged from their cars, beaten, and set ablaze. Their burned corpses were then dragged through the streets before being hung over a bridge crossing the Euphrates.[11]
    Siege, April 2004
    Main article: First Battle of Fallujah

    In response to the killing of the four US citizens, and intense political pressure, the US Marines commenced Operation Vigilant Resolve. They surrounded the city and attempted to capture the individuals responsible as well as others in the region who might have been involved in insurgencies. One out of every two mosques in Fallujah were used to hide fighters or weapons.[12] The Iraqi National Guard was supposed to work alongside with the US Marines in the operation, but on the dawn of the invasion they discarded their uniforms and deserted.[13] Under pressure from the Iraqi Governing Council, the US aborted its attempt to regain control of Fallujah. The US Marines suffered 40 deaths in the siege. Estimates of the number of Iraqi deaths (both fighters and civilians) in the attack range from 271 (according to Iraqi Ministry of Health officials[14][15]) to 731 (according to Rafie al-Issawi, the head of the local hospital[16]).

    The occupying force on April 9 allowed more than 70,000 women, children and elderly residents to leave the besieged city. On April 10, the US military declared a unilateral truce to allow for humanitarian supplies to enter Fallujah. US troops pulled back to the outskirts of the city. An Iraqi mediation team entered the city in an attempt to set up negotiations between US forces and local leaders, but as of April 12 had not been successful. At least one US battalion had orders to shoot any male of military age on the streets after dark, armed or not.[17] In violation of the Geneva Convention, the city’s main hospital was closed by Marines, negating its use, and a US sniper was placed on top of the hospital’s water tower.[18]

    There were also reports of the use of cluster bombs by US forces in Fallujah during this time, including reports from Al Jazeera on April 9 and 15, which US State Department spokesperson Richard Boucher later described as “totally false.”[19][unreliable source?] Similar reports came from several other sources who reported on 26 April 2004: “A spokesman for an Iraqi delegation from the violence-gripped city of Fallujah on Monday accused U.S. troops of using cluster bombs against the city and said they had asked the United Nations to mediate the conflict.[citation needed] Mohammed Tareq, a spokesman for the governing council of Fallujah and a member of the four-person delegation, said U.S. military snipers were also responsible for the deaths of many children, women and elderly people.” And the Economic Press Review reported on 17 April 2004: “American F-16 warplanes are blitzing the Al-Julan residential area in Al Fallujah 50 kilometers west from Baghdad with cluster bombs.”[citation needed]

    The ceasefire followed a wave of insurgency activity across southern Iraq, which included the capture of two US soldiers, seven employees of US military contractor Kellogg, Brown and Root, and more than 50 other workers in Iraq. Several of the prisoners were released within days of their capture, while the majority were executed.[citation needed]

    The US forces ostensibly sought to negotiate a settlement but promised to restart its offensive to retake the city if one was not reached. Military commanders said their goal in the siege was to capture those responsible for the numerous deaths of US and Iraqi security personnel. As the siege continued, insurgents conducted hit-and-run attacks on US Marine positions. The Marines had announced a unilateral ceasefire.[citation needed]
    Truce, May 2004

    At the beginning of May 2004, the US Marine Corps announced a ceasefire due to intense political pressure. Most of the fighting was limited to the southern industrial district, which, had the lowest population density inside the city limits and the northwest corner of the city in the Jolan district. There were also Marine battalions in the northeast and southern portion of the city. While both sides began preparations to resume offensives, General Conway took a risk and handed control of the city to a former Iraqi general with roughly 1,000 men who then formed the Fallujah Brigade, while acknowledging that many of the people under control of the general were probably insurgents themselves (no verification was provided). The general, Major General Muhammed Latif, replaced a US choice, Jasim Mohammed Saleh, who was alleged to have been involved in the earlier atrocities against Kurds during the Iran-Iraq war.[20] The ceasefire terms were to give control of Fallujah to General Latif on condition that Fallujah becomes a secure region for coalition forces and halt incoming mortar and rocket attacks on the nearby US bases. Latif’s militia wore Iraqi military uniforms from the Hussein era. Another tenet of the cease-fire was the establishment of a Traffic Control Point (TCP) on the eastern side of the city just west of the “cloverleaf”. This TCP was constantly manned by a platoon of Marines and a platoon from the Iraqi National Guard and saw almost daily firefights for the rest of the summer.

    Inside the city, mosques proclaimed the victory of the insurgents over the United States.[citation needed] Celebratory banners appeared around the city, and the fighters paraded through the town on trucks. Iraqi governing council member Ahmed Chalabi, after a bombing that killed fellow IGC member Izzadine Saleem, blamed the US military’s decisions in Fallujah for the attack, stating “The garage is open and car bombs are coming repeatedly.”[21]

    Fallujah, according to reporters who have visited in mid-summer, had since become a sort of Islamist mini-state, with Sharia law enforced by mujahedin.[citation needed] Owners of shops that sold US-style magazine and barbers who offered “Western-style” haircuts were beaten and publicly humiliated. Inter-faction fighting was also rampant.[22] The Fallujah Brigade was soon marginalized and ceased to be more than another faction in what had effectively become a no-go area for coalition troops.
    Counter-insurgency, May – November 2004

    Throughout the summer and fall of 2004, the U.S. military conducted sporadic airstrikes on Fallujah. U.S. forces reported that all were confirmed targeted, intelligence-based strikes against houses used by the group of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, an insurgency leader linked to al-Qaida.

    In October and early November, 2004, the U.S. military prepared for a major offensive against the rebel stronghold with stepped up daily aerial attacks using precision-guided munitions[23] against militant “safe houses,” restaurants and meeting places in the city. U.S. Marines also engaged in firefights on a daily and nightly basis along the perimeter of the city. There were again conflicting reports of civilian casualties.[24]:256–267

    CNN incorrectly reported on October 14, 2004, that the US offensive assault on Fallujah had begun and broadcast a report from a young Marine outside Fallujah, 1st Lt. Lyle Gilbert, who announced that “troops have crossed the line of departure.” Hours later, CNN reported their Pentagon reporters had determined that the assault had not, in fact, begun. The Los Angeles Times reported on December 1, 2004, that, according to several unnamed Pentagon officials, the Marine’s announcement was a feint—part of an elaborate “psychological operation” (PSYOP) to determine the Fallujah rebels’ reactions if they believed attack was imminent.

    On November 7, 2004, the U.S.-appointed Iraq interim government declared a 60 day state of emergency in preparation for the assault, as insurgents carried out several car bomb attacks in the Fallujah area which killed Iraqi army and police, U.S. Marines and Iraqi civilians. The next day Prime Minister Iyad Allawi publicly authorized an offensive in Fallujah and Ramadi to “liberate the people” and “clean Fallujah from the terrorists”. Marines, U.S. Army soldiers and allied Iraqi soldiers stormed into Fallujah’s western outskirts, secured two bridges across the Euphrates, seized a hospital on the outskirts of the city and arrested about 50 men in the hospital. About half the arrested men were later released. A hospital doctor reported that 15 Iraqis were killed and 20 wounded during the overnight incursions. The US armed forces have designated the offensive as Operation Phantom Fury.

    In the first week of Operation Phantom Fury, government spokesman Thair al-Naqeeb said that many of the remaining fighters have asked to surrender and that Iraqi authorities “will extend amnesty” to those who have not committed major crimes.[25] At the same time, US forces prevented male refugees from leaving the combat zone, and the city was placed under a strict night-time shoot-to-kill curfew with anyone spotted in the Marines’ night vision sights shot.[26][27]
    U.S.–Iraqi offensive of November 7, 2004
    Main article: Second Battle of Fallujah

    Journalists embedded with U.S. military units, although limited in what they may report, have reported the following:

    On November 8, 2004, a force of around 2,000 U.S. and 600 Iraqi troops began a concentrated assault on Fallujah with air strikes, artillery, armor, and infantry. The New York Times reported that within an hour of the start of the ground attack, troops seized the Fallujah General Hospital. “Patients and hospital employees were rushed out of rooms by armed soldiers and ordered to sit or lie on the floor while troops tied their hands behind their backs”.[28] Noam Chomsky in his book Failed States commented that according to the Geneva Conventions, medical establishments “may in no circumstance be attacked, but shall at all times be respected and protected by the Parties to the conflict.” [29] Troops seized the rail yards North of the city, and pushed into the city simultaneously from the North and West taking control of the volatile Jolan and Askari districts. Rebel resistance was as strong as expected[citation needed], rebels fought very hard as they fell back. By nightfall on November 9, 2004, the U.S. troops had almost reached the heart of the city. U.S. military officials stated that 1,000 to 6,000 insurgents were believed to be in the city, they appear to be organized, and fought in small groups, of three to 25. Many insurgents were believed to have slipped away amid widespread reports that the U.S. offensive was coming. During the assault, Marines and Iraqi soldiers endured sniper fire and destroyed booby traps, much more than anticipated. Ten U.S. troops were killed in the fighting and 22 wounded in the first two days of fighting. Insurgent casualty numbers were estimated at 85 to 90 killed or wounded. Several more days of fighting were anticipated as U.S. and Iraqi troops conducted house-to-house searches for weapons, booby traps, and insurgents.
    On 9 November, CNN Correspondent Karl Penhaul reported the use of cluster bombs in the offensive: “The sky over Falluja seems to explode as U.S. Marines launch their much-trumpeted ground assault. War planes drop cluster bombs on insurgent positions and artillery batteries fire smoke rounds to conceal a Marine advance.”[30]
    November 10, 2004 reports by the Washington Post suggest that U.S. armed forces used white phosphorus grenades and/or artillery shells, creating walls of fire in the city. Doctors working inside Fallujah report seeing melted corpses of suspected insurgents.[31] The use of WP ammunition was confirmed from various independent sources, including U.S. troops who had suffered WP burns due to friendly fire. On November 16, 2005 The Independent reported that Pentagon spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Barry Venable “disclosed that (white phosphorus) had been used to dislodge enemy fighters from entrenched positions in the city”…”We use them primarily as obscurants, for smokescreens or target marking in some cases. However, it is an incendiary weapon and may be used against enemy combatants.”[32] But a day before, Robert Tuttle, the U.S. ambassador to London, denied that white phosphorus was deployed as a weapon: “US forces do not use napalm or white phosphorus as weapons.”[33][34]
    On November 13, 2004 a Red Crescent convoy containing humanitarian aid was delayed from entering Fallujah by the U.S. army.[35][36]
    On November 13, 2004, a U.S. Marine with 3rd Battalion, 1st Marines was videotaped killing a wounded and unarmed prisoner in a mosque. The incident, which came under investigation, created controversy throughout the world. The man was shot at close range after he and several other badly wounded Iraqi prisoners had previously been left behind overnight in the mosque by the U.S. Marines. The Marine shooting the man had been mildly injured by insurgents in the same mosque the day before.[37][38] In May 2005, it was announced that the Marine would not face a court-martial. In a statement, Maj. Gen. Richard F. Natonski, commanding general of the I Marine Expeditionary Force, said that a review of the evidence had shown that the shooting was “consistent with the established rules of engagement and the law of armed conflict.” [39]
    On November 16, 2004, a Red Cross official told Inter Press Service that “at least 800 civilians” had been killed in Fallujah and indicated that “they had received several reports from refugees that the military had dropped cluster bombs in Fallujah, and used a phosphorus weapon that caused severe burns.”[40]
    As of November 18, 2004, the U.S. military reported 1200 insurgents killed and 1000 captured. U.S. casualties were 51 killed and 425 wounded, and the Iraqi forces lost 8 killed and 43 wounded.[41]
    On December 2, 2004, the U.S. death toll in Fallujah operation reached 71 killed.[42]
    Some of the tactics said to be used by the insurgents included playing dead and attacking, surrendering and attacking, and rigging dead or wounded with bombs. In the November 13th incident mentioned above, the U.S. Marine alleged the insurgent was playing dead.[43]
    Of the 100 mosques in the city, about 60 were used as fighting positions by the insurgents.[citation needed] The U.S. and Iraqi military swept through all mosques used as fighting positions, destroying them, leading to great resentment from local residents.
    In 2005, the U.S. military admitted that it used white phosphorus as an anti-personnel weapon in Fallujah.[44]

    On 17 May 2011, AFP reported that 21 bodies, in black body-bags marked with letters and numbers in Roman script had been recovered from a mass grave in al-Maadhidi cemetery in the centre of the city. Fallujah police chief Brigadier General Mahmud al-Essawi said that they had been blindfolded, their legs had been tied and they had suffered gunshot wounds. The Mayor, Adnan Husseini said that the manner of their killing, as well as the body bags, indicated that US forces had been responsible. Both al-Essawi and Husseini agreed that the dead had been killed in 2004. The US Military declined to comment.[45]
    Aftermath

    Residents were allowed to return to the city in mid-December after undergoing biometric identification, provided they carry their ID cards all the time. US officials report that “more than half of Fallujah’s 39,000 homes were damaged, and about 10,000 of those were destroyed.” Compensation amounts to 20 percent of the value of damaged houses, with an estimated 32,000 homeowners eligible, according to Marine Lt. Col. William Brown.[46] According to the NBC,[47] 9,000 homes were destroyed, thousands more were damaged and of the 32,000 compensation claims only 2,500 had been paid as of April 14, 2005. According to Mike Marqusee of Iraq Occupation Focus writing in The Guardian,[48] “Falluja’s compensation commissioner has reported that 36,000 of the city’s 50,000 homes were destroyed, along with 60 schools and 65 mosques and shrines”. Reconstruction is only progressing slowly and mainly consists of clearing rubble from heavily-damaged areas and reestablishing basic utility services. This is also due to the fact that only 10% of the pre-offensive inhabitants had returned as of mid-January, and only 30% as of the end of March 2005.[49]

    Health effects

    Research by Chris Busby, Malak Hamdan and Entesar Ariabi published in 2010 lent credibility to anecdotal news reports of increases in birth defects and cancer after the fighting in 2004.[51] Results from a survey of 711 households in Fallujah on cancer, birth defects and infant mortality suggested that large increases in cancer and infant mortality had occurred. Responses to the questionnaire also suggested an anomalous mean birth sex ratio in children born a year after the fighting, indicating that environmental contamination occurred in 2004. Although the authors noted the use of depleted uranium as one possible source of relevant exposure, they emphasized that there could be other possibilities and that their results did not identify the agent(s) responsible for the increased levels of illness.

    #17409

    In reply to: Foxcatcher

    PA Ram
    Participant

    I get the feeling that Dupont video was edited to put him in the best light possible. I bet he said a lot of weird stuff during filming that had to be edited out or shot again.

    I think he probably made for an interesting subject for the psychiatrists. Apparently while in prison he was diagnosed as paranoid schizophrenic.

    http://www.courierpostonline.com/story/news/2014/08/03/foxcatcher-fodder-john-du-ponts-bizarre-downfall/13556321/

    In the months before John E. du Pont shot and killed Olympic gold medal wrestler Dave Schultz in 1996, signs of his worsening mental illness were on display, according to court testimony and interviews by Wilmington News Journal reporters following the killing. (The News Journal is a sister paper of the Courier-Post.)

    The du Pont story is being told in the newly released film “Foxcatcher.” The movie, starring Steve Carell and Channing Tatum, is generating early Oscar buzz

    Long before du Pont shot Schultz at his 880-acre estate in Newtown Square, Pa., the heir was unraveling.

    The founder of the Delaware Museum of Natural History, du Pont had held a loaded machine gun to the chest of another wrestler, removed treadmills and bicycles from his estate because he thought their clocks were sending him backward in time and shot a group of nesting geese because he believed they were casting spells on him.

    I don’t mean to belittle any of this. Mental illness is a serious subject and it seems that a lot of patients do not get the care they need. This guy had tons of money and yet they really could not help him in the end. Perhaps he should have been in a facility somewhere, for his safety and for others.

    I suspect, because he had money, people tolerated him, tip-toed around his odd behavior or even fed into his fantasies.

    It’s a shame, really.

    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. " Philip K. Dick

    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    …I’m just gonna finish putting up that whole article
    cause its good writing and interesting stuff.
    w
    v

    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/nfl–offensive-guru-and-coaching-candidate-greg-roman-a-victim-of-his–niners–success-022509392.html
    …Adds 49ers running backs coach Tom Rathman: “I was surprised he didn’t get a job this year, because I think he has everything. Not only does he have the X’s and O’s down, but he motivates his players. He’s a real leader. Players love him. He fits the mold of some really good coaches. We were really lucky we got him back again next year. When he gets a shot, I think he’s gonna open a lot of eyes.”

    Long before his current colleagues could conjure visions of a Roman Empire, the Jersey Shore native was showing his initiative in the shadow of the Boardwalk Empire.

    Greg Roman talks with Colin Kaepernick prior to the Patriots game. (Getty)

    Growing up in Atlantic City, Roman spent his summers shuttling ice-cream containers to beachside vendors, probably making less in July and August than the price of prying one’s F-150 from a San Francisco impound lot.

    Roman, the youngest of three boys raised by a single mother, was already volunteering with the Special Olympics by the time he was eight. His older brother, Matthew, has Down’s Syndrome, and their close relationship has clearly impacted him on both personal and professional levels.

    “That’s my buddy,” Roman says of Matthew. “He’s a huge part of my life.”

    When Roman played at John Carroll, a Division III school near Cleveland, Matthew was a frequent visitor. He’d hang out, go to parties and pretty much get treated like the coolest kid at school. The guy has plenty of personality: Once, after being introduced to Panthers owner Jerry Richardson when Greg was a low-level member of Carolina’s coaching staff, Matthew said, “You’re Greg’s boss? You need to pay him more.”

    Greg, while at John Carroll, established Project H.O.P.E., a program that brought developmentally disabled kids onto campus to participate in a variety of sports. Says Roman of the event, which still occurs annually at the school: “It was the first time I took the reins over something and brought it up from the ground floor.”

    On the football field, Roman was far less altruistic. A 5-foot-8 nose guard, Roman made up for his lack of size with a disproportionate share of attitude.

    “On the field he was nasty,” Caldwell recalls. “He was competitive. He was our team leader. He self-proclaimed our defensive line the ‘Legion of Doom.’ The younger guys were probably more intimidated by him than anything. But people gravitated toward him because he was easy to talk to.”

    In 1995 Roman hooked on with the expansion Panthers, serving as an unpaid assistant strength and conditioning coach. He segued into a simultaneous gig as Capers’ defensive quality control coach, later switching over to a similar role on the offensive side.

    “He came in and was an energetic young guy, anxious to learn as much as he could,” Capers recalls. “Greg’s a loyal guy, a hard worker and has a very good mind. It’s a good combination. He’s earned everything that he’s gotten.”

    Recalls Caldwell, who rented a room from Roman after coming to the Panthers as a scouting assistant in ’96: “I remember I’d come home, it’d be May or June, and Greg would be in the kitchen, diagramming plays and studying the playbook. It was our off time. I was like, ‘What are you doing?’ ”

    Capers was fired following the ’98 season and replaced by George Seifert, who’d coached the Niners to a pair of Super Bowl victories. Seifert kept Roman on as an offensive assistant assigned to the team’s tight ends — and began noticing similarities to another highly motivated young staffer who’d started off in San Francisco handling player ticket requests for road games.

    “He kind of reminded me of [Jon] Gruden,” Seifert recalls. “Gruden would always sit and watch [veteran offensive line coach] Bobb McKittrick’s meetings and delve into all aspects of the game. Basically, Greg was the same kind of guy. It wasn’t like he was just gonna work with the tight ends. He was gonna know every facet of the offense. He knew it, in some ways, better than some of the coaches on the staff.

    “He asked a lot of questions. He was very specific and he was a sponge. He wanted to know everything. He was bright. He had a smirk. He could tell a joke, and if it didn’t go over, he could take the abuse.”

    Roman’s strong sense of self served him well in subsequent stints with the Texans (where he coached tight ends and quarterbacks from 2002-05) and Ravens (where he was an assistant offensive line coach from 2006-07). When he arrived in San Francisco with Harbaugh, he remembered his roots, making the team’s position coaches feel invested in the product and creating an inclusive environment. Roman not only delegates game-planning responsibilities to Rathman, quarterbacks coach Geep Chryst, offensive line coach Mike Solari and receivers coach John Morton, but he also solicits their play-calling suggestions in the heat of battle.

    “We sit in the room and he’ll put his thoughts up on the board and ask what we think, and we’ll collectively discuss things,” Rathman says of Roman. “It’s not just him. He’s looking for input from all the coaches he works with. And he listens.”

    [More: Near-death experience doesn’t deter prospect Dion Jordan]

    Says Roman: “I’ve been in that position — the frustrated assistant who wants to voice his opinion. It’s frustrating. I used to throw out insane stuff, just to get people going.”

    Roman may not be a dictator, but he has no problem dictating to opposing defenses. “He knows how to take that defense apart,” Rathman says. “He breaks ’em down. He definitely has [swagger]. He’s got a lot of confidence. But he should have a lot of confidence.”

    “I’m a riveter in the morning and a poet at night,” Roman says, twirling some cellophane noodles with Dungeness crab on his fork. He is sitting at a bayside table at the Slanted Door, a trendy Vietnamese restaurant, with a crystal-clear view of Alcatraz Island.

    While providing insight into the way he crafts and executes a game plan — a lengthy explanation that will ultimately lead us to the impound lot — Roman manages to make a brutally violent sport with 22 simultaneous moving parts seem suspiciously like a chess match.

    “Play-calling, it’s week to week, but sometimes it goes beyond that, too,” Roman says. “I don’t want to sound too melodramatic. But here’s what it is: I orchestrate sequences of events. I don’t just grab plays. Everything I do has a purpose. I’m thinking big picture.”

    And as Roman suggests, many of those thoughts come at odd hours. “A lot of my [expletive] happens at night — late at night,” he says. “I’m nocturnal. I’ll be in bed, asleep, and I’ll get up and walk into the other room and start writing things down. It’s hard to turn it off.”

    To turn it back on the next day, Roman employs a strategy familiar to many working Americans.

    “He drinks a lot of coffee in the morning,” Staley says. “He’s like a mad scientist in his room, scheming up plays. He comes down to our install meetings on Wednesdays just pouring sweat. He looks like a nervous high school student. We ask him, ‘Are you all right? You just sweat profusely.’ I’m in the front row, too. There are times when he’s dripping sweat on the overhead projector.”

    The plays Roman unveils on the screen, of course, are far more aesthetically pleasing. “He’s a genius when it comes to football,” Staley says. “He comes up with crazy stuff you don’t see anywhere else — and he calls it at the perfect time.”

    Except, of course, when he intentionally doesn’t. In mid-December, after the Niners pulled out a 41-34 victory over the New England Patriots to improve to 10-3-1, Roman consciously decided to dial back the offense in order to keep potential playoff opponents off balance.

    That approach seemed dubious the following Sunday night in Seattle, when the 49ers absorbed a 42-13 thrashing at the hands of the Seahawks, but Roman took solace in the fight Kaepernick displayed in leading San Francisco to a late touchdown. The next week, though Roman kept things relatively conservative, the 49ers defeated the Arizona Cardinals to clinch the NFC West title and a first-round bye.

    Two weeks later against the Packers, Roman unleashed the fury.

    “My post-New England mindset was to hold back and try to save things for the playoffs,” Roman says. “We did a bunch of [read-option plays] against New England, but you run into that question of exposure. The reality is that you’ve got to win playoff games. That was definitely part of the plan. Because NFL teams are too good — you start showing something and having success, they’re gonna find a way to stop it.

    “You don’t want to make a living on it. If you can win a game and hold that back, why not? I coached defense. I know what it’s like when you have to prepare for something like that. It’s all hands on deck. It’s mayhem.”

    The Niners faced some chaos of their own in each of their final two games of 2012. Against the Falcons in the NFC championship game, they trailed 17-0 before rallying to win 28-24. In the Super Bowl, the Ravens took a 28-6 lead early in the second half before the lights went out in the Superdome and the light went on for San Francisco’s offense. In both crises, Roman kept his cool.

    “We’re down in the NFC championship game, and he stays calm and sticks to his game plan, and we launch that comeback,” Gore recalls. “In the Super Bowl, same thing: We don’t panic. When we started clicking, the [Ravens’] defense, they didn’t have a clue.”

    And then, seven yards from a potential go-ahead touchdown, the Niners’ offense mysteriously stalled. In the weeks since, Roman has been questioned by armchair coordinators for everything from not calling more running plays to not staying exclusively with the read option to trying to force the ball to Crabtree at the expense of other targets. If it makes them feel any better, he has broken it down thousands of times in his mind — and, of course, in his sleep.

    Roman knows what he called, and knows how close he was to riding in a parade down Market Street while being lauded by the same people as the second coming of Bill Walsh. And now, as he stands on Bryant Street underneath a raised portion of the interstate, preparing to reclaim his ride, the riveter/poet is being asked to relive the maddening sequence yet again.

    First-and-goal from the 7, 2:39 remaining: Gore, who’d just busted off a 33-yard run, was on the sidelines as backup running back LaMichael James lined up behind Kaepernick in a full-house Pistol formation. James took a handoff and slipped through a hole to his immediate right; Ravens linebacker Dannell Ellerbee plugged the gap and nailed him after a two-yard gain. In retrospect, Roman’s cool with his decision — a little more room and James could have made a cut and cruised into the end zone.

    Second-and-goal from the 5, following the two-minute warning: Kaepernick, lined up in the shotgun, rolled right and threw short and off target to Crabtree, who’d been bumped by cornerback Corey Graham. Many observers later wondered whether Kaepernick should have instead tried to thread a high pass over the middle to Randy Moss, who appeared to be open on the play. In the Niners’ coaching box, they were yelling for a pass interference call on Graham.

    Third-and-goal from the 5, 1:55 remaining: This one was the killer. Kaepernick lined up in the Pistol, with Gore to his immediate right. It was a read-option play, in theory, but it essentially was a quarterback counter. Kaepernick, after a step backward, was going to run behind right guard Alex Boone and Gore, each of whom was pulling left.

    Roman was sure the quarterback was going to score. He was sure the Ravens’ coaches were sure a touchdown was imminent. Yet with the play clock nearing zero, Harbaugh called timeout. Chalk it up to the downside of having turned over an offense to a tantalizingly talented but inexperienced quarterback in November. Harbaugh and Roman took a calculated risk, and it was a split-second away from paying off.

    At that point, with the Ravens’ coaches having just watched their season flash before their eyes, Roman was convinced of one thing: There’s no way Baltimore would stay passive. Sure enough, two “Cover 0” blitzes were coming. And Roman, playing the percentages, dialed up plays that called for Crabtree — Kaepernick’s favorite target — to be the “hot” receiver. “Wouldn’t you rather give your guys a chance to make a play?” Roman asks rhetorically.

    [Related: Michael Crabtree said he was momentarily blinded on last play]

    Third-and-goal, Part II: Kaepernick lined up under center, took a conventional snap, dropped back and made a quick pass to Crabtree, who had gone in motion to the right and cut hard to the sideline. Cornerback Jimmy Smith got there quickly and dislodged the ball from the receiver’s hand, setting up the final play.

    Fourth-and-goal from the 5, 1:50 remaining: Kaepernick, from the Pistol, had little time to throw as Ellerbee came in hard and unblocked on the blitz. Crabtree and Smith did some back-and-forth pushing before Kaepernick threw for the receiver and the ball fell incomplete. On the sideline, Harbaugh went crazy, gesturing for defensive holding. No call. No Super Bowl triumph. No satisfaction.

    View gallery
    .

    Michael Crabtree reaches for the ball on fourth down in the fourth quarter against the Ravens. (USA TODAY Spor …
    Suffice it to say that Roman is highly motivated to end next season under a stream of red-and-gold confetti — ideally, with another franchise waiting impatiently to hire him as its head coach. Surely, that inconvenient timing issue could hamstring him the way it did this past season, though the buzz about Roman in league circles will likely be louder in 2013. Says Caldwell: “I would envision him being one of the top (head-coaching candidates), with his track record of success, his experiences both at the college and pro level, and his offensive IQ and his defensive IQ.”

    Conveniently, the Niners remain loaded, with the prospect for improvement, having added to their already large pool of draft picks by trading Smith to the Kansas City Chiefs. And Roman has a new toy in ex-Ravens wideout Anquan Boldin, stolen for a sixth-round selection earlier this month.

    On paper, the 49ers look like preseason Super Bowl favorites. Yet, as Roman knows all too well, nothing is promised in the NFL. For one thing, Capers and his fellow defensive coordinators will devote much of their offseason to devising ways to combat the read option.

    “Oh yeah, they’re gonna find ways to stop it,” Roman says as he gets behind the wheel of his truck and prepares to head south into rush-hour traffic, with a stop to pick up some Febreze on his immediate agenda. “It’s gonna go back and forth. And we’ve gotta predict what they will do and figure out how to counter that.

    “But the reality is, if you’ve got a guy who can throw the ball like [Kaepernick] can and run it like he can, it eventually becomes a numbers game. What do you want to stop? Then we turn to something we call play-action, and it’s a huge advantage.

    “So yeah, they’re gonna be spending a lot of time on this. They should. This is real. And we’re just getting started.”

    More from Michael Silver on the NFC West:

    #15803
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Rams likely won’t rush into new offensive coordinator hire

    By Nick Wagoner | ESPN.com

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — As of late Wednesday afternoon, there wasn’t much to know about the St. Louis Rams’ now vacant offensive coordinator position.

    We know that Brian Schottenheimer has taken the same position (with added quarterback coach responsibilities) at the University of Georgia. We know the Rams now have an opening. But we don’t know who will be next in line to take Schottenheimer’s place.

    The one thing we do know, however, is that Rams coach Jeff Fisher probably won’t rush into any hire unless he decides to hire from within.

    Jeff Fisher typically takes his time hiring new assistant coaches.”I think there’s always a list,” general manager Les Snead said Wednesday. “Jeff’s philosophy is always, ‘Hey, be patient, don’t rush into it.’ But it’s like anything. what’s the pool like? This is all happening. You’ll see the philosophy with Jeff is let’s be patient, let’s go through. I think that’s what you’ll see.”

    That’s what we’ve seen from Fisher when the defensive coordinator job has popped up in each of the past two offseasons.

    In 2013, Fisher fired Blake Williams, the de facto defensive coordinator and linebackers coach, on Jan. 2. From there, Fisher deliberately went through the interview process, spending time with the likes of Dick Jauron and Mike Singletary before he hired then-Detroit Lions defensive backs coach Tim Walton on Feb. 15.

    Last year, Fisher appeared to be committed to keeping Walton, but after taking some time to go through his options and, most importantly, repair his relationship with Gregg Williams, he fired Walton on Jan. 29. It was quickly apparent that Gregg Williams would be the new defensive coordinator, but Fisher didn’t even make that official for another two weeks.

    In this case, Schottenheimer’s departure doesn’t come at the behest of Fisher. At Fisher’s end-of-season news conference, he was asked what he thought of Schottenheimer’s performance. To the chagrin of many Rams fans, Fisher offered an enthusiastic endorsement.

    “I think Brian is an outstanding playcaller,” Fisher said. “He’s very organized. He’s an excellent teacher. You can’t put the record on his shoulders. That’d be very, very unfair.”

    That endorsement followed another underwhelming performance from a Rams offense that regularly forced the defense to play almost perfect football just to have a chance. The Rams finished 28th in yards per game, 20th in rushing yards, 23rd in passing yards and 23rd in points per game in 2014.

    That effort wasn’t much of an upgrade over his previous two seasons in charge. In 2013, the Rams were 30th in yards per game, 19th in rushing yards per game, 27th in passing yards per game and 22nd in points per game. In 2012, the Rams ranked 23rd, 19th, 18th and 28th in those respective categories.

    Of course, Schottenheimer had his share of challenges along the way, including the repeated loss of starting quarterback Sam Bradford, several injuries along the offensive line and a big injury this season to receiver Brian Quick. And it’s also important to remember that Schottenheimer coached for Fisher, and much of the conservative approach falls in line with what Fisher prefers.

    Nonetheless, the Rams offense regularly struggled to find ways to use Tavon Austin in the offense and the team’s inability to make adjustments at halftime repeatedly put the Rams behind the eight ball on offense in the final 30 minutes of games.

    The Rams offense averaged a feeble 2.6 points in the third quarter of games this season, which ranked 30th in the NFL. They weren’t much better in the fourth quarter, either, posting 4.8 points per game in the final 15 minutes, which was tied for 24th in the league.

    As for possible replacements, there are many former head coaches with offensive backgrounds who could be appealing. That list includes former Bears coach Marc Trestman, former Browns coach Rob Chudzinski and in-limbo Niners coordinator Greg Roman. If Fisher decides to stay in house, one name to remember is current tight ends coach Rob Boras.

    No matter the ultimate decision, Fisher’s history would indicate two things: He won’t be looking to turn the offense in a drastically different direction and we won’t get an answer in the immediate future.

    bnw
    Blocked

    <div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>bnw wrote:</div>
    I’m not automated and such mantra about Schotty is deserved. Whether TA was worth a first round pick is on others.

    Yeah that “automated” phrase came off wrong. But I also really don’t buy the “creativity” thing on Schott. How “creative” were Bevell and Roman? Heck one of the reasons Seattle let Harvin go–according to them–is that there is only so much you can do to fit a guy like that in. And IMO there’s no problem with Tavon or with picking him, it’s just that he should never be thought of as a (pure) receiver. And when he was a slow learner in 2013, I didn’t see any reason why that would change overnight in 2014. Heck it took Dante Hall 3 years before he caught more than 30 something passes. I just think that as a receiver, Tavon is in the same boat. I think he will learn a lot more than he knows, if people are patient, but so far he is more or less what many thought he would be–a multi-purpose, combined yards guy.

    Harvin was a cancer in the locker room. That is why he had to go. Good move by Carrol. Harvin was also injured too much and at the end refused to play. I wish the best for TA but in real progress I like what his WV teammate Bailey has shown this year in what shortened season he had.

    The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.

    Sprinkles are for winners.

    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    I’m not automated and such mantra about Schotty is deserved. Whether TA was worth a first round pick is on others.

    Yeah that “automated” phrase came off wrong. But I also really don’t buy the “creativity” thing on Schott. How “creative” were Bevell and Roman? Heck one of the reasons Seattle let Harvin go–according to them–is that there is only so much you can do to fit a guy like that in. And IMO there’s no problem with Tavon or with picking him, it’s just that he should never be thought of as a (pure) receiver. And when he was a slow learner in 2013, I didn’t see any reason why that would change overnight in 2014. Heck it took Dante Hall 3 years before he caught more than 30 something passes. I just think that as a receiver, Tavon is in the same boat. I think he will learn a lot more than he knows, if people are patient, but so far he is more or less what many thought he would be–a multi-purpose, combined yards guy.

    #14984
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    OURLADS’ 2015 BIG BOARD TOP 50 3.0
    ShareThis
    email Email

    Updated: 12/29/2014 11:23AM ET

    Pick Player Pos. School HT WT 40 Time
    1
    Marcus Mariota* QB
    Oregon
    6040 224 4.55
    2
    Leonard Williams* DT/DE
    USC
    6050 300 4.85
    3
    Jameis Winston* QB
    Florida State
    6040 235 4.85
    4
    Amari Cooper* WR
    Alabama
    6010 204 4.49
    5
    Shane Ray* DE
    Missouri
    6034 255 4.60
    6
    Randy Gregory* DE/OB
    Nebraska
    6060 240 4.65
    7
    Ronnie Stanley* LOT
    Notre Dame
    6054 318 5.00
    We don’t know if he’s coming out but he’ll be high on next years radar. Stanley is a long armed,good technique player with excellent lateral movement. He features an explosive punch in pass pro and an aggressive attitude in the run game.
    8
    DeForest Buckner* DE/DT
    Oregon
    6060 286 5.00
    Junior entry.
    9
    Cedric Ogbuehi LOT
    Texas A&M
    6050 300 4.95
    Three-and-a-half year starter with experience at left and right tackle plus guard. A long torso athlete with a thick lower body and long arms. Exceptional feet and is smooth athletically in pass protection. Sits down in pass protection with good knee bend. Keeps his hands inside on the breastplate. Powerful enough to club a pass rushing defensive end. Good initial quickness and is athletic on pulls. Sudden to gain position on his blocking target. One of the few tackles in the 2015 Draft who can handle edge speed consistently. Good lateral quickness. Gets depth quickly on kick step when protecting the passer. Would like to see more urgency as a pass protector and finish his run blocking better.
    10
    Andrus Peat* LOT
    Stanford
    6070 312 5.25
    11
    Mario Edwards* DE
    Florida State
    6030 280 4.85
    12
    Melvin Gordon* RB
    Wisconsin
    6010 212 4.45
    A difference maker with rare ability who changes the outcomes of games. Plays with a top effort and consistency versus all competition. Possesses rare and exceptional critical factors and production to win games. Improved as a pass catcher in 2014.

    A patient and explosive runner with exceptional vision and cutting ability. A downhill runner from the I or off set I- formation with a burst to and through the hole between the tackles. He runs with his eyes. Follows and cuts off his blockers. Has Eric Dickerson’s slide and glide ability. A smooth runner who can slash and break tackles when he is running the Badger’s power “O” play. Generates power in his lower body with strong leg drive. Always going forward with a low pad level and his eyes up. Drives his legs on contact. Not easy to tackle. Has the ability to see the cut back lanes and jump cut in the hole. Gordon also lines up in the slot and runs the Jet sweep wide picking up speed as he goes then turns the corner to burst up the field. A coveted North-South runner who sees the hole and hits it. A strong runner at the point of attack. Collided head on with a free linebacker blitzer, bounced off, spun outside, and accelerated down the sideline. He possesses a third gear open field burst where he can outrun secondary pursuit angles. A strong runner with good contact balance. Gordon is particularly impressive as a runner because opponents had no respect for the Wisconsin passing game and dropped their safeties down to 7-8 yards off the line of scrimmage. Gordon ran through heavy traffic and made himself small through the hole. One fourth of the cold weather back’s carries have gone for over 10 yards in his career. Only player in FBS to have three 70+ yard runs in 2013. He also has 10 runs of 40+ yards over the past two years. Gordon combined with James White to rush for 3053 yards to set a single season FBS rushing record for two teammates in a year. Over the past two years he has rushed for 2328 yards in 288 carries as a rotation back. The elusive runner is the NCAA’s active career leader in yards per carry at 8.1 yards. This season he will share carries with Corey Clement. He lowers his pad level in short yardage, 1st down, and goal-line carries.
    Caught only 1 pass for 10 yards in 2013. James White was generally in on pass downs and Gordon was on the sideline. He did run a few check down routes and a nine route from a wide receiver position. He needs to improve as a complete back catching the ball out of the backfield. Improve his release and his routes. Gordon caught passes with receivers during the winter drills to improve his hands. He will also need to elevate his game as a blocker and pass protector. Has the courage and willingness to excel, just needs to do it on game day.

    In the Capital One Bowl game against South Carolina, Gordon rushed for 146 yards and carried Jadeveon Clowney on his back five yards to pick up a first down on one carry. Versus Penn State Gordon was out on a pass route and the ball was batted and intercepted by a defensive lineman. Gordon chased the tackle 40 yards and stripped the ball out to stop a touchdown. Penn State had to settle for a field goal. In the Big 10 championship game in 2012, Gordon rushed for 216 yards in 9 carries versus Nebraska. He flashes Walter Payton’s high step over a tackler ability and demonstrates Chris Johnson’s explosive running skills. He is not a fumbler. Secures the ball. The well built back rushed for 1609 yards averaging 7.8 yards per carry. He scored 12 TDs and rushed for over 140 yards per game in 6 of his first 7 games in 2013.

    13
    Ifo Ekpre-Olomu CB
    Oregon
    5092v 185v 4.45
    Tore ACL in practice late in season. Three-year starter who played in all 14 games as a true freshman. A first-team All-Pac 12 performer his sophomore and junior seasons. Name is pronounced ee-fo eck-pray-olo moo. A very instinctive and aware corner who is able to make a mental adjustment on his feet with sudden reactions. An explosive player with suddenness in his body despite his size. Blessed with extreme recovery speed which helps him arrive before the ball gets to the receiver. Smooth and fluid. Good body control. No wasted movement in his transition. Plays as fast as he needs to. Sudden closing burst. Tough and aggressive in run support. Very competitive. Slips the block and makes a play. Doesn’t shy away from tackling contact. Doesn’t lunge or overextend in press coverage. Has the talent to be a Pro Bowl slot corner with his quick feet, plant and drive, stop and go quickness, burst to close on the ball, timing, and leaping ability. He can also play outside. A tough-minded corner who accepts a challenge. Through 4 games he has 20 tackles, 1 tackle for loss, 1 interception, and 2 pass breakups. Had a hiccup vs Washington St. by being on the short end of two touchdown passes. Got picked on one TD & was beaten by a perfect throw on another.
    14
    Kevin White WR
    West Virginia
    6027 211 4.50
    15
    Danny Shelton NT/DT
    Washington
    6020 330 5.25
    Three-year starter who is active and explosive in his play. An ideal 3-4 scheme nose tackle but will fit in as a five technique 4-3 defender. Opened the 2014 season with 12 tackles versus Hawaii. Leads the Huskies in total tackles and entering the Stanford game he leads the nation in sacks with 7 and is tied for the NCAA lead in tackles for loss with 9.5. Bottom line, Shelton is a high motor, great effort interior player who is tough to block and occupy. The massive and stout inside defender stacks double teams and has a quick get off on the snap. Feels and reads interior blocking schemes. A run stuffer who can press the pocket in the passing game. Doesn’t stay blocked. Quick to disengage. Earned 1st team All-Academic Pac-12 honors in 2012 and 2013. Threw the shot put over 60 feet in high school and was a standout prep wrestler. Changed his jersey number from 71 in 2013 to 55 in 2014.
    16
    Trae Waynes* CB
    Michigan State
    6010 183 4.49
    Plays field corner in a press man-to-man secondary scheme. Has a slender and wiry build with long arms and quick feet. Redshirt in 2011. Played mostly special teams’ coverage in 2012. Started all 14 games as a sophomore as a field corner. Recorded 50 tackles, 1.5 TFL, 8 passes defended, and 3 INTS.

    A cover corner with good hip flexibility and body control. Hard to shake. Jams a receiver then can turn and run with no separation. Good press-bail technique. Always in position to make a play on the ball. Top end quickness, agility, and balance. Easy and athletic back pedal and lateral movement. Good change of direction. Tight in man-to-man coverage. Can reroute wide receiver and keep position on him. Active and disciplined in his play. Quick reactions on every throw in his area. A lockdown college corner who is smooth in transition. Nose to nose with wide receiver. Good two arm extension to jam and reroute pass catchers. Waynes can get on top of a receiver and make a play. Even on a perfect throw he’s there competing for the ball then makes the tackle. Good ball skills and production. Has good eye/hand coordination. Not asked to force and contain often, but will not turn down a hit or allow an outside release. Disciplined in coverage. Mentally and physically tough. An NFL caliber competitor. Nickel specialist.
    Waynes is a tough and aggressive tackler who relishes hitting. More of a cut tackler than a wrap up guy. He will slip off a tackle on a big receiver (Cody Latimer, Indiana). The Spartan field corner will shed a block quickly and push a ball carrier out-of-bounds. He does not lack tackling courage. In the Big 10 championship game, Waynes drove on 230-pound runningback Carlos Hyde in the flat and cut him down for no gain.

    Trae Waynes is a very good and confident athlete with a high level of energy and intensity. He appears to have a bouncy and eager personality who loves competition with the urge to dominate a receiver. He takes pride in his ability. Waynes is alert and has good field awareness. Has the positive coverage traits of Lardarius Webb (Ravens), Sam Shields (Green Bay), Tim Jennings (Chicago), and Alterraun Verner (Tampa Bay) when they were coming out of college. Excels on the kickoff and punt return special teams. A late 1st round or early second round talent if he runs in the 4.40-4.45/forty range.

    17
    Landon Collins* SS
    Alabama
    6000 212 4.55

    18
    Brandon Scherff OT/OG
    Iowa
    6045v 320v 5.0
    Three-year starter at left tackle, less the last five games of his sophomore year missed due to injury. A powerful run blocker who will get a shot at right tackle on the next level, but has the talent to be a Pro Bowl guard like former Hawkeye Marshal Yanda of the Ravens. Moves equally as well out of a three or two point stance. A competitor who plays with a good shoulder width base and mirrors the pass rusher up the field. Plays with a good two arm extension in pass pro. Has the feet to run over a blitzing safety. Plays square with good knee bend. Physical when he gets his hands on a defensive end. Sets the edge as a zone blocking tackle.

    19
    Eddie Goldman* DT
    Florida State
    6040 314 5.00
    20
    Jake Fisher ROT
    Oregon
    6064v 300v 5.10
    Three-year starter. Starter at right tackle but moved to left after Tyler Johnstone was injured in 2014. Played as a true freshman. Creates seams for the explosive Duck backs. Was a tight end and defensive lineman at Traverse City (MI) West High School. Two year recipient of Oregon’s “Pancake Club Award”. Gave Shilique Calhoun of Michigan State a workout in the Duck-Spartan matchup early in the 2014 season. Physical on down blocks, double teams, and combo blocks in the running game. Sustains and finishes his blocks with functional play strength and balance. Demonstrates a focused attitude and aggression to engage initial contact with base, balance, and knee bend. Stays square with the ability to shadow the pass rusher. Good hand quickness, punch, and placement to control his opponent. Suffered an undisclosed knee injury in the Wyoming game. Returned for the UCLA game and played left tackle.
    21
    DeVante Parker WR
    Louisville
    6025 207 4.55
    22
    Vic Beasley OB
    Clemson
    6027v 220v 4.55
    Two-year starter who is an upfield pressure player. Appears to have matured in 2014. He had a productive season last year but was undisciplined, selfish, and unsportsmanlike in his play and had a 15 yard slashing-his-throat penalty. There were several plays where he was out of control and missed sacks or tackles. It appears the dumb plays are behind him and he can concentrate on his assignments and technique. Was one of the country’s top pass rushers in 2013 and one of Clemson’s most athletic players. Can run laterally as well as dip and lean around the corner. Explosive first step quickness from stance to opponent. Has quick hands, quick feet, and a closing burst to the quarterback. Gives effort as a pass rusher. Flexible to bend and play low. Will change up his moves from arm over, rip, and spin. Flashes a sudden jolt and explosion to the offensive tackle. Slender lower body. Can be single blocked at times by a tight end. Has trouble with big tackles. So far in three games he has 9 tackles, 5 tackles for loss, 4 sacks (39 yards), and 1 pass broken up.
    23
    Marcus Peters* CB
    Washington
    6000 195 4.50
    24
    Jaelen Strong* WR
    Arizona State
    6030 205 4.50

    25
    Cameron Erving LOT
    Florida State
    6052v 298v 5.20
    Moved to center to solidify offensive line play. Three-year starter at left tackle after a move from defensive tackle. Awarded the Jacobs’ Blocking Trophy as the best offensive lineman in the Athletic Coast Conference in 2013. Appears to enjoy playing the game. A good athlete who is enthusiastic and plays under control. A zone blocker who competes on a consistent basis. Long arms and a good base. Very good on his redirect versus a two-move defender. Good lateral quickness and pulling ability. Light feet with the ability to bend and punch. Creates lanes in the run game.

    26
    Alvin “Bud” Dupree DE/OB
    Kentucky
    6035v 268v 4.59
    Three-year productive starter as both a defensive end and outside linebacker. Has an athletic skill set that combines his size, strength, and football intelligence to create big plays for the Wildcats. Listed in the SEC’s top 10 for the past two years in sacks (13.5) and tackles for loss (22). Moves easily for a big man. A fast twitch athlete who plays well on his feet or with his hand in the dirt. Explosive first step quickness to get off on the snap and lateral quickness to contain the outside run. Can bend the edge of a defense and come flat down the line. Has good hand quickness and a closing burst to the quarterback. Good pass rush effort. An edge pass rusher who looks the part including his 40.5 inch vertical jump to get into the passing lanes. Collected 91 total tackles as a sophomore and 61 tackles as a junior.
    27
    Maxx Williams TE
    Minnesota
    6050 250 4.65
    Red-shirt sophomore. A chainmover in the Gopher run oriented offense. If he were in a pass oriented offense he would put receiving records out of sight.Son of former NY Giant guard Brian Williams. Mother Rochelle was a Big 10 Medal of Honor winner in volleyball. Caught 29 passes for 471 yds. averaged 16.2 yds per reception

    28
    La’el Collins OT
    LSU
    6044v 324v 5.10
    Three-year starter on the left side of the line. As a sophomore was the starting left guard and at left tackle the past two years. Heading into the fall, Collins played 1,690 snaps on offense with 134.5 knockdowns. A competitor who looks lean at 324 pounds. A good athlete who can adjust on the run to block or run over corner support. Good arm length and body control to redirect and shift weight quickly to defeat an opponent. Generally plays with a stout base and knee bend but has a tendency to narrow his base at times in pass protection. A powerful run blocker who can use more anchor strength as a pass protector.

    http://www.ourlads.com/top-32-college-senior-prospects/nfl-draft/2015/2592129

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by Avatar photoAgamemnon.

    Agamemnon

    #14779
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Black Monday Primer: A definitive guide to the 2015 coaching carousel

    BY DON BANKS/SI.com

    http://www.si.com/nfl/2014/12/24/2015-nfl-black-monday-coaches-fired-jim-harbaugh-rex-ryan

    Those seasonal winds of change are getting ready to blow on the coaching staffs and front offices of the NFL, but from all indications, there isn’t going to be quite as much activity in the league’s firing/hiring season as we first anticipated. Believe it or not, Black Monday — the day of bloodletting after the close of the NFL’s regular season — might not be quite so bleak this year, with several undecided team owners showing signs that they are starting to lean toward a sense of patience and continuity in regard to their staffing.

    Fancy that. With seven or eight coaching changes made in the NFL in each of the past four seasons, this year’s coaching carousel has a chance to feature the least amount of turnover since only three teams changed coaches in 2010. Look around the league as we approach Week 17 and you’ll see several teams where coaching or general manager changes were once projected, but now look much more unlikely:

    Miami owner Stephen Ross has come out in recent days and assured the continued employment of both coach Joe Philbin and general manager Dennis Hickey. Washington’s uptick in performance the past two weeks has removed whatever doubt there might have been regarding coach Jay Gruden’s status for next season. The Giants are finishing strong offensively, with three consecutive victories, and that has buoyed the chances that New York will not feel forced to move on from either coach Tom Coughlin or GM Jerry Reese.

    The signs point toward stability in Jacksonville with coach Gus Bradley getting a third season in that massive rebuilding job, and Carolina miraculously being in position to defend its NFC South title this Sunday in Atlanta probably means coach Ron Rivera survives into a fourth season in Charlotte. In Buffalo, though there’s the unpredictability of new ownership with Terry and Kim Pegula, head coach Doug Marrone is thought to have secured his job for next year by getting the Bills to the eight-win mark, their best record in 10 years.

    And in St. Louis, while the record is again last-place material at 6-9, Jeff Fisher’s club has posted several impressive upsets from midseason on, and has the makings of one of the league’s best defenses. In short, no changes are expected in St. Louis.

    Who does that leave on the firing line? Glad you asked. It appears to be shaping up as a year that will include four or five changes among the head coaching ranks, with perhaps a similar number of moves, or slightly less, made at the general manager level.

    After speaking with league executives, personnel men, team sources and agents, here’s an around-the-league encapsulation of what we think we know about the changes that are about to unfold.

    Going, going, gone

    • San Francisco — This just in: 49ers head coach Jim Harbaugh will be coaching the final game of his interesting four-year tenure in San Francisco when the Cardinals visit Levi’s Stadium on Sunday afternoon. And my biggest question is: Can Harbaugh continue to rock his now-familiar black-and-khaki combination no matter whose sideline he lands on in 2015? I’d say at Michigan no, and Oakland yes, because the Raiders would be so happy to hire him they’d let him wear a pink tutu if he so desired.

    A few things I’m hearing in regard to where San Francisco may turn in the search for its next coach: With all the time the 49ers have had to contemplate life after Harbaugh, the thinking is owner Jed York and GM Trent Baalke already know exactly who they want to hire. Their coaching search will be short and sweet and is likely to produce a hire who is seen as someone Baalke can work with seamlessly and fairly well control. After the drama of the Harbaugh era, the 49ers are not looking for another big ego or ultra-demanding personality on the sideline.

    Two names that make a lot of sense: Seattle defensive coordinator Dan Quinn, who I’m told the 49ers front office has already spent a lot of time studying, and Arizona defensive coordinator Todd Bowles. Both have been very successful in the NFC West, and thus would theoretically help San Francisco while also hopefully weakening one of the two rivals that finished above the 49ers in the division this season. That’s a double whammy San Francisco might like to inflict on either the Seahawks or Cardinals. Bowles is probably the “hot coordinator’’ most likely to get a head coaching job this offseason, after the superb job he did scotch-taping the depleted Arizona defense together this year.

    If the priority is to fix the issues that have surfaced with franchise quarterback Colin Keapernick’s game this season, the offensive-minded candidates who figure to get the first and longest looks include highly respected Denver offensive coordinator Adam Gase, New England offensive coordinator Josh McDaniels and Indianapolis offensive coordinator Pep Hamilton.

    If management wants an internal candidate, defensive line coach Jim Tomsula has long been considered the in-house favorite, but it’d be somewhat curious if the team elevated him over its successful defensive coordinator Vic Fangio, who is very well liked in the locker room. Tight ends coach Eric Mangini is also a potentially viable choice, but I don’t think the former Jets’ and Browns’ head coach would be a well-received selection.

    One wild-card candidate who could surface if the 49ers surprise us and seek a bigger name with a Super Bowl résumé: former Packers and Seahawks head coach Mike Holmgren, who has the itch to coach again and has let it be known he wants back on the sideline. Holmgren would certainly not fit the lower profile-type coach Baalke is said to be seeking, but the former 49ers’ offensive coordinator does have Bay Area credibility galore, and he’d help diffuse some of the heat coming from a fan base that still doesn’t understand how the franchise could run off the coach who took the team to three consecutive NFC title games in his first three years on the job.

    • New York Jets — Head coach Rex Ryan and embattled second-year general manager John Idzik were both almost assured of being fired after this season’s three-win disaster, but the news Monday that team owner Woody “Bullet Proof’’ Johnson is preparing to bring in former Houston and Washington general manager Charley Casserly as a hiring consultant seemingly guarantees a house-cleaning is on tap in Gotham. Idzik was hired two years under the agreement that he would retain Ryan as his head coach, and now he’ll never get the chance to handpick his own guy for that job. And that’s the way that story ends.

    On the GM front first, that job was difficult to fill the last time it was vacant, after the firing of Mike Tannenbaum, and I don’t think the search will be any easier this time around for Johnson, who is not seen as someone candidates are eager to tie the future of their careers to. I expect the Jets to go hard after promising Ravens assistant general manager Eric DeCosta, especially since Casserly and DeCosta have history together dating to DeCosta’s days as a personnel intern in Washington. But DeCosta has been hesitant to leave Baltimore in the past, where he has been groomed as GM Ozzie Newsome’s eventual replacement, and I don’t see much changing on that front on behalf of the always chaotic Jets.

    Former Bucs general manager turned ESPN analyst Mark Dominik could be in line for an interview in New York, but if there’s a coaching-GM tandem to keep on the radar screen it’s Baltimore offensive coordinator Gary Kubiak and Texans director of college scouting Mike Maccagnan. Kubiak, the former Houston head coach, was hired by Casserly as the Texans’ coach in 2006 and is known for his strong work with quarterbacks — a skill that could come in handy for the Jets if they choose to continue the team’s Geno Smith era or start over at the game’s most pivotal position.

    Two other candidates who likely will be on the Jets’ wish list include Seattle’s Quinn, who would continue the club’s bent toward head coaches with a defensive background (see Ryan, Herm Edwards, Al Groh, Bill Parcells, Pete Carroll, etc.), and New England’s McDaniels, a hire that would strike a blow against the Jets’ archrivals, those Beasts of the East to the North. I don’t think McDaniels would touch the job — I know he wouldn’t get a thumbs-up from onetime would-be Jets head coach Bill Belichick — but I suppose you never know. Once upon a time Eric Mangini made that trek from Foxboro to New Jersey, and look at how well that turned out. Never mind.

    • Oakland — Did you know on a clear day you can see Santa Clara from Oakland? Actually I have no idea if that’s true, but I’m guessing the Raiders hope Jim Harbaugh buys it, if only because it might help buttress their case to land the biggest fish in this year’s coaching market. Staying in the Bay Area and being in position to exact revenge on the 49ers might be the two best selling points Oakland has in wooing Harbaugh. I mean, other than the $8-million-plus per season compensation that he seems likely to require.

    Most league sources I talked to believe it’s down to either Oakland or Michigan for Harbaugh, and while his preference is to stay in the NFL, the lure of Ann Arbor and being able to resurrect the struggling program at his alma mater might be too tempting an opportunity to say no to. If there’s a possession arrow at the moment, indications are it has begun to slightly point in the direction of the Wolverines. Remember, the Harbaugh family quotes Bo Schembechler on a near-daily basis, and considers the ex-Michigan coach in their own personal pantheon of heroes. To have Jim ascend to that throne would be close to a dream-come-true material.

    Or as one source told me: “He can go there and be God, and never get fired. That’s a home he can live in and stay at. It’ll be like [Nick] Saban in Alabama. He’ll do whatever he wants there. I’d call that the logical place for him.’’

    That said, Raiders owner Mark Davis has already swung and missed on Jon Gruden — who said no thanks and signed a new extension with ESPN — and he’ll throw his best sales job at Harbaugh in an effort to finally restore Oakland to the level of playoff contender. It just may work, if Harbaugh can’t overcome his hesitancy to go back to the college coaching ranks. With the promising Derek Carr at quarterback, a couple of productive drafts in a row, and some late-season progress made with three home wins, the Raiders have more to offer right now than they’ve had in quite some time.

    If Harbaugh does say yes to the Raiders, it’s bad news for Oakland GM Reggie McKenzie, who will lose his job to the personnel man of Harbaugh’s choosing, perhaps ex-Browns GM Mike Lombardi or current Eagles personnel VP Tom Gamble. Both are believed to be on his short list for requested personnel chiefs if he stays in the NFL.

    But where do the Raiders go if Harbaugh spurns them? It’s not out of the question that Davis will turn back to the tandem of interim head coach Tony Sparano and McKenzie in the short term. That option might make as much sense as any if Davis can’t land a game-changing headline name. Sparano did have the team improving down the stretch and has some vocal support from his locker room. He wouldn’t cost much to sign as the fulltime coach, and with the Raiders still paying off the fired Dennis Allen, money could be one of the deciding factors if Harbaugh isn’t coming.

    If there’s a previous NFL head coach with a chance to surface in Oakland, Denver defensive coordinator Jack Del Rio makes some sense. He has ties in the area, and the Broncos’ defense, at least before Monday night’s meltdown in Cincinnati, has played exceptionally well this season. Del Rio is an experienced and proven commodity who won 70 games in his almost nine-season tenure in Jacksonville, and that’s nothing to sneeze at in a place like Oakland. The Jaguars have won exactly 11 games since Del Rio was fired with five games remaining in 2011, so his work there is looking better and better all the time.

    On very shaky ground

    • Chicago — The Bears have been a disaster on the field and a soap opera off it this season, and that’s a combination that can rarely be survived. It’s almost hard to keep track of who has thrown whom under the bus at this point. But while it looks likely that head coach Marc Trestman won’t see a third season in the Windy City, few sources believe his firing is a 100 percent eventuality. At least not yet. Bears GM Phil Emery is believed to be in big trouble himself, with Trestman’s hiring and that Jay Cutler mega-extension on his record, but he is said to still retain the confidence of Bears president Ted Phillips. If the usually patient Bears grant Emery another season, it’s not out of the question he might be loyal enough to impart the same last-chance leniency to his head coach.

    The problem is, Bears fans are in an uproar and want sweeping change. If you let Emery stay and fire Trestman, you’re letting the GM who made the mistake on the coach hire the next coach. That’s not going to be easy to sell to the natives. It’s a combustible environment in Chicago, and the idea of keeping things completely status quo and expecting different results in 2015 seems ludicrous.

    Jim Harbaugh, of course, was a first-round pick of the Bears in 1985 and played quarterback for Mike Ditka. He would check a ton of boxes for what ails Chicago, including leadership in the locker room, a potential quarterback guru for Cutler and a wildly popular hire to feed to the fans and the media. But nobody seems to think Harbaugh wants to head back to the Bears, so their attention is likely to be unrequited. If he’s going to live and work in a cold-weather state, chances are Harbaugh is bound for Michigan and cult-like status with the Wolverines.

    If Trestman leaves and Harbaugh isn’t an option, you could make a case for soon-to-be-ex-Jets-head-coach Rex Ryan in Chicago. The Bears’ defense has become completely toothless the past two seasons, and Ryan’s father, Buddy, was the successful and iconic defensive coordinator of those beloved Super Bowl-winning ’85 Bears (just as he was with the ’68 Jets, come to think of it). Ryan would be a hit with the fans and has the bravado and bluster that Chicagoans love.

    After Emery chose Trestman over eventual Cardinals coach Bruce Arians two years ago, going with Ryan would be something of a make-up move for that blunder. But saddling Ryan with a team with quarterback issues would be all-too-familiar, and almost cruel. Would Ryan pick Chicago over an easy-money TV gig? The answer to that question is not known, and may not matter in the long run.

    I could see Gase surfacing in a Chicago coaching search as well. He briefly worked with Cutler on McDaniels’ staff in early 2009, but that didn’t go too well. Still, having the Peyton Manning seal of approval will probably carry a lot of weight, given the Bears’ current quarterback predicament. And lastly, don’t forget about Mike Shanahan, the only coach seemingly to ever have a great relationship with Cutler, after drafting him for Denver out of Vanderbilt in 2006. Shanahan says he’s open to coaching again in the right situation, and who would be shocked if Chicago turned to him out of desperation with Cutler’s regression and high-salaried status?

    • Atlanta — The Falcons’ situation didn’t look complicated for much of this season, but now it’s a little tricky. With Atlanta capable of winning the NFC South at 7-9 if it beats the visiting 6-8-1 Panthers on Sunday, is Falcons head coach Mike Smith safe if he delivers a playoff berth, no matter if it makes his club the best team in the worst division in NFL history? Or will it take more than just another one-and-done playoff trip — something the Falcons unfortunately know plenty about — to bring Smith back in 2015?

    And what of general manager Thomas Dimitroff’s fate? Most observers seem to think he’s close to owner Arthur Blank and will survive a second consecutive disappointing season in Atlanta, but there’s no consensus on that front and some still believe he’s vulnerable. There’s been plenty of talk this season that the Falcons front office is a tense, volatile place to work, with something less than complete teamwork being exhibited. Blank could be angry enough to clean house, especially since he feels the pressure of negative fan reaction with a new $1.4 billion stadium under construction and some early cost overruns to the tune of $400 million.

    “There have been some fireworks there this year,’’ one league source said. “You’ve got people paddling in a lot of different directions in Atlanta.’’

    Unless Atlanta stages a deep playoff run — which seems wholly unlikely in a stacked NFC field — the well-liked and successful Smith is probably going to be out of a job at some point soon. Dimitroff is a respected general manager and Blank probably isn’t ready to sever that relationship. I would put McDaniels and Gase near the top of the Atlanta coaching search and leave them there, especially if former Patriots top personnel man Scott Pioli continues as the Falcons assistant general manager. With quarterback Matt Ryan and receiver Julio Jones on the roster, the Falcons will own one of the most attractive openings on the coaching market.

    What else we’re hearing as Black Monday looms …

    • New York Giants — As the Giants continued what became a seven-game losing streak, Tom Coughlin’s job security looked worse by the minute. But now that New York has won three in a row to get to 6-9, and showed signs of offensive prowess with rookie receiver Odell Beckham Jr. emerging as a clear-cut star, Coughlin will likely be given another chance in 2015 to break the franchise’s three-year playoff drought. Probably. The caveat is that Giants owners John Mara and Steve Tisch will meet to discuss the state of the team a day or two after the season ends. Until that confab occurs, nothing is set in stone.

    General manager Jerry Reese is thought to be safe as well, and with Eli Manning again playing like a franchise quarterback, chances are the Giants will keep things status quo and frame 2015 as a win-or-else type of season. The hope is that a second year under offensive coordinator Ben McAdoo, and an NFC East that is still devoid of a dominant team, will do the trick.

    • Carolina — As strange as the season has been in Carolina — a 2-0 start, a 1-8-1 middle, and a 3-0 finish so far — you can’t rule anything out in terms of potential fallout. But the reality is the Panthers had no business contending for a second straight NFC South title this year, but here they are. If they win at Atlanta, they’ll have a home playoff game in the postseason’s first round, and that will be an improbable enough victory for a team that has endured a series of setbacks, challenges and obstacles this year.

    If the Panthers don’t go to the playoffs and finish a dismal 6-9-1, head coach Ron Rivera may have to sweat out a few days of limbo and a year-end-review meeting with owner Jerry Richardson, who may make him squirm a bit in dissecting what went wrong. But I think Rivera has done enough to warrant further employment, and getting his players to finish strong with three December victories after sinking to 3-8-1 speaks well for him.

    • Buffalo — Even with a disappointing loss at Oakland on Sunday, which might cost the Bills (8-7) a shot at their first winning season since 2004, head coach Doug Marrone has made progress this year and is not thought to be in danger of losing his job. But new ownership does tend to make changes upon assuming control, and Buffalo’s Terry Pegula had something of a reputation for shaking up the NHL Sabres’ front office fairly often.

    Most sources I spoke with think Pegula will give Marrone and general manager Doug Whaley a full season of evaluation and learn more about the entire organization before contemplating any top-level moves. But there are those who believe Whaley could be vulnerable to be replaced this offseason, with the team’s overdrafting of quarterback EJ Manuel in 2013 and the steep cost of the first-round deal for receiver Sammy Watkins in a receiver-rich 2014 draft hurting Whaley’s cause dramatically. The Bills gave up their 2015 first-round pick to move up five spots and select Watkins, who has had a strong rookie season. But they could have stayed put and taken Odell Beckham Jr. or other standout rookie receivers, while retaining their No. 1 pick next season.

    • Washington — While Jay Gruden won’t fall victim to the one-and-done treatment that the likes of Marty Schottenheimer received in Washington in 2001, the bigger question in D.C. is if the team will consider conducting a search for a top-level personnel executive to bring into the fold to work with team president/general manager Bruce Allen.

    Some believe that move would give Gruden the best possible chance to succeed, adding a talented personnel evaluator to the mix, helping upgrade Washington’s front office and adding another strong voice in the room.

    But Washington currently has former Chargers GM A.J. Smith in a senior executive advisory role on the personnel side, and if there are any changes to come, sources say it’ll be to promote Smith to general manager and let Allen retain his team presidency. Allen assumed personnel final authority after the firing of Mike Shanahan last year.

    • Tennessee — Titans president/CEO Tommy Smith at midseason declared first-year head coach Ken Whisenhunt and third-year GM Ruston Webster both safe. And they most likely are. But the Titans’ record at that point was 2-6, and they’re now 2-13, with a galling nine-game losing streak that has remarkably come against teams that entered each of those games coming off a loss. The lack of competitiveness in the season’s second half might well induce Smith to rethink his vote of confidence, and even more concerning has been the total silence coming from Smith’s office in recent weeks. Whisenhunt’s standing after just one season is probably fairly secure, but if there is a change forthcoming in Nashville, it would likely be to Webster’s status.

    • Cincinnati — With the big win at home over Denver on Monday — in prime time, no less — the Bengals have clinched their fourth consecutive trip to the playoffs at 10-4-1. A win at Pittsburgh on Sunday will bring a second straight AFC North title, and when you consider that Cincinnati had never gone to the postseason even two years in a row until 2011-12, the Marvin Lewis era has set the standard for success in the Queen City.

    But what if the Bengals for the fourth year in a row go one-and-done in the playoffs? Would that affect Lewis’ job security? Wasn’t that the mantra in Cincinnati this season from the start, that just making the playoffs wouldn’t be enough in 2014?

    I guess we’ll see if owner Mike Brown is out of patience, if the Bengals lose their playoff-opener, dropping Lewis to 0-6 in the postseason in his 12-year career in Cincy. Most expect that Lewis would have to explain to Brown how 2015 will be a different story, but would survive yet another early playoff exit. But Lewis’ 196 career games without a playoff win are the most in NFL history for any coach serving with one team. And that glaring statistic gets more difficult to explain by the year.

    • Dallas — All is hiccups and giggles in Dallas, where Jason Garrett’s surprising Cowboys (11-4) have won the NFC East and made the playoffs for the first time since 2009. The only rumbling I’ve heard is in regard to offensive coordinator/offensive line coach Bill Callahan, who, according to a league source, might be leaving Dallas by his own choice after the season.

    Callahan had his playcalling duties taken away by Garrett last offseason, when Dallas hired Scott Linehan and gave him that responsibility as the team’s passing game coordinator. Under Callahan, the Cowboys offensive line and running game has blossomed into one of the NFL’s best, but Linehan has also received a good deal of credit for the unexpected success in Dallas this season.

    #14088
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    1. La’el Collins OT
    2. Cameron Erving OT

    http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1824825/lael-collins
    STRENGTHS: Collins possesses a square-ish build that makes him appear better suited to guard. His frame belies his quick feet, an attribute that when combined with his long arms, impressive strength and aggression make him a devastating run blocker. Collins is often the quickest of LSU’s offensive linemen off the snap and he routinely drives his assignment off the line of scrimmage with pure power, creating easy running lanes for LSU’s backs. He’s surprisingly quick to the second level and has good body control to adjust to moving targets.

    As a pass blocker, Collins shows good initial quickness in his kick-slide and uses his long reach to maintain the arc. When he gets his hands on opponents and remains square, it is generally lights out for the defender.

    WEAKNESSES: He does not possess elite balance and can be challenged by speed-rushers. He’ll over-compensate occasionally and leave the inside open for counters.

    Collins’ aggression is admirable but also leads to mistakes. Rather than patiently waiting for defenders to come to him, Collins will occasionally lunge, making himself top-heavy and prone to slipping down the body of his opponent. This can lead to his hands getting too low or slipping onto the side and/or back of defenders, which invites them to swim over the top of him to disengage.

    –Rob Rang (8/18/14)
    ————————-
    STRENGTHS: Versatile athlete who has transitioned from the defensive side of the ball to start at both left tackle and center. Boasts a pretty remarkable combination of size (6-feet-5, 309 pounds) and athleticism, and blends length with surprisingly light feet and flexibility.

    As a run-blocker, displays the toughness and aggression that made him an impact performer on the other side of the football as he works to finish opponents with strong hands and impressive natural power in his lower half. Frequently asked to block at the second level. He pulls smoothly, showing impressive initial quickness and acceleration for a man of his size.

    Possesses the light feet and fluidity to thwart some of the nation’s best edge rushers at tackle, while also showing the ability to seal off defensive tackles at center.

    Shows smooth athleticism in his kick-step to handle speed off the edge as well as the strong hands to latch on and control his opponent. Perhaps most impressive, Erving plays with good knee bend, which helps him win the leverage battle and generally anchor well against bull rushes.

    WEAKNESSES: Simply needs to become a more consistent technician. Footwork gets a bit sloppy in pass protection at times and he’ll bend at the waist to catch the rush rather than absorbing with his lower half. Tendency to rely too heavily on his upper body when battling, often stopping his feet when engaged.

    Aggression sometimes works against Erving. He’ll drop his head on contact, providing defenders opportunities to wash through him. Fails to adjust when blocking on the move, at times. While he’s quick to the second level, Erving too often loses track of his target, winding up where he thought the play was going to go only to have his assignment run past him. Each is a correctable skill that the athletic big man should improve upon as he gains experience.

    –Rob Rang & Derek Stephens (11/20/14)
    Player Overview
    =====================================

    w
    v

    • This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    • This reply was modified 10 years, 6 months ago by Avatar photowv.
    #13823
    mfranke
    Participant

    RamView, December 11, 2014
    From Row HH
    (Report and opinions from the game.)
    Game #14: Cardinals 12, Rams 6

    The Ram offense and pass rush take Thursday night off, and guarantee they’ll get the postseason off, again. In a discouraging loss to Arizona, they seemed to remember nothing of what had made them effective in recent weeks. That’s not a sign of progress.

    Position by position:
    * Strategery: This week’s headline: another rough week for Brian Schottenheimer. The bad trends the Ram offense appeared to have shaken the past few weeks all came flooding back. This isn’t the first time Schottenheimer has struggled against a blitz-heavy defense. A tactic that failed for almost three quarters was sending the running backs out into the pattern. If you’re going to do that, you need to throw to those backs, but the Rams hardly did. Benny Cunningham popped a screen for 20 early and should have popped another but screwed it up. Those were about all the tries the RBs got as receivers. That wasn’t enough to get press coverage off the WRs, and the amount of zero protect Shaun Hill got exposed to wasn’t worth the investment. Would have been best had Schottenheimer just kept the RBs back in blitz protect all of the time, where they did strong work, especially Cunningham, who was terrific.

    Schottenheimer adjusted for that in the 3rd, but for probably the 13th time in 14 games this season, the Ram offense was dreadful out of halftime, with five ugly three-and-outs. Schottenheimer’s inability to counter the blitz otherwise demanded the Rams establish the run, but here, he continued his nagging pattern of not letting his players do what they do best. Three times in the quarter, Tre Mason ran left for 6 or 7 yards behind Greg Robinson, and yet, the Rams still did not manage a first down, as Schottenheimer continues to insist on running the small Mason into the teeth of the defense behind Davin Joseph and Scott Wells, the line’s worst blockers. Early in the 3rd he even shifted Joseph Barksdale into a jumbo left formation outside Robinson… and ran right behind Joseph. A big loss there should have surprised no one. Greg Robinson was born to run block. Feel free to run behind him!

    That wasn’t Schottenheimer’s only failure to exercise the Rams’ speed, another old pattern he slipped back into. Austin got a touch on the Rams’ opening play and didn’t get another on offense until the fourth quarter. You need to get him and Mason out to the edge to spread the Arizona defense out. A nice play sequence in the 4th helped set up the Rams’ 2nd FG. Austin ran an end-around that set up a reverse to Bailey the next play. 20 yards, just like that. As good as those plays were, the Rams needed significantly more of them, significantly earlier.

    Rams Nation is livid about the 3rd-and-goal play from the 1 at the end of that drive. On its own, the call is actually pretty likeable. Both teams have all 11 men in the box. The Rams have a fullback and three tight ends, including Barnes eligible; it’s obviously a run, right? If Hill had rolled out of this formation like he did and hit a TE for a TD, we’d have all been jumping in glee. This play always works! It’s everything they didn’t do on the game-losing play in San Diego. They ran play-action, they had a blocker back for Hill, they were deceptive, they didn’t force a bad throw into the middle of the field. But Arizona was all over it. They went into the play thinking, stop the run but don’t forget they might pass. Todd Bowles has got a heck of a well-coached defense. Feel free to blame Schottenheimer if you feel Arizona was all over the play because the Rams run it down on the goal line too often. I’m not sure any run was going to work down there. Maybe if they had gone behind Robinson. Which they rarely do.

    Bottom line is that the Rams lost to a better-coached team forced into playing a lot of second- and third-stringers. As deep as we are into the Fisher era, Bruce Arians has been in Arizona two years and they have passed us up like we’re a Ford Fiesta on the Autobahn, even though they’ve had a rash of injuries that would excuse any team having a bad season, let alone a bad night. Jeff Fisher has made a big difference over what the Rams had with Linehan and Spagnuolo, no doubt whatsoever. But the Ram coaches need to be a difference against the coaches they actually compete against. Schottenheimer’s been failing at the same kind of things as an OC for a long time now. He’s more of a hurdle than a help. The Rams don’t need to change their system. They need to call plays better. They can keep trying to jump the hurdle, and racking themselves, or they can remove the hurdle.

    * QB: OK, I promise to be shorter with the other sections. Shaun Hill’s play wasn’t great, but it was better than his numbers (20-39-229, PR 58.6) may look. Despite heavy pressure in his face most of the game, he made a number of nice throws. He came out beating the Cardinal blitz with a lob over a LB to Tavon Austin and a screen to Benny Cunningham for 20. He made a nice pass to Corey Harkey down the left seam between two defenders for 20 to set up the opening FG. The only problem: Lance Kendricks had several steps on his man down the right seam and would have had a TD. That didn’t seem like a game-changer at the time, but the Rams struggled with the Arizona pass rush the rest of the game. Hill finally got them back to midfield before halftime with a nice sideline pass to Kendricks, 15 more to Stedman Bailey on a crossing route and then scrambling for 9 himself. The last two plays of the half, though, he probably held the ball too long, got sacked once and pummeled from behind another. Timing problems in the passing game really flared up in the 2nd half. Hill and Kenny Britt missed connections a number of times. Hill would have to try to beat a blitz by throwing deep but Britt either couldn’t get there because of coverage or didn’t get there because he’d broken off his route. That and Hill having to throw passes away under pressure hurt his numbers. There was a little bit of a deep game. In the 4th, Hill got a duck of a pass off to Bailey for 38 to set up the Rams’ 2nd FG. He got the Rams back out to midfield in the final 2:00 with a 22-yarder to Britt. The one time all night Hill had an open receiver and made a bad throw was the wrong time. From the Arizona 43, he had Bailey wide open in the slot. Hit him in stride and he is going a long way. No, Hill’s throw was high and behind Bailey and he couldn’t haul it in. Hill’s Hail Mary pass at the end of the game was laughable. Fisher should have put Johnny Hekker in; he would neither punt nor throw a ball that ugly. It looked end over end as Patrick Peterson fair-caught it to damage Hill’s passer rating. So no, it’s not like the Rams’ poor protection and play-calling is holding back the next Aaron Rodgers here or anything. We’d like it if he moved better in the pocket, showed better awareness, didn’t get so many passes knocked down for a man of 6’3” and didn’t throw deep passes that look like they’ve been shot right after they come out of his hand. But except for the two big missed plays with Bailey and Kendricks, Hill took what he could get without turning the ball over. I won’t hang much of this loss on him.

    * RB: The Ram RBs had a more difficult night. Lousy blocking got Tre Mason (13-33) buried for a loss of 5 on his first carry, and it was an uphill climb even from there. He had a nice gain going on a wrap play in the 1st until future Hall of Famer Frostee Rucker dived and hacked him on the arm to force a fumble deep in Ram territory. That gave away a FG in a game where every scoring opportunity was big. This may remind Mason to carry the ball tighter to his body. The RBs also need a reminder that they’re not Barry Sanders. Benny Cunningham (2-4, 3-23 recv) took off with a well-setup screen for 20 early in the game, but given a similar splendid opportunity late in the half, he danced, tried to cut it inside instead of taking the easy 10+ he would have gotten outside and got two. Mason got some good gains behind Greg Robinson and Rodger Saffold in the 2nd half but the Ram staff seems to much prefer futile slams into backed-up blocking in the middle of the field. The Rams only ran twice near the goal line but neither time went well. Cunningham got stuffed on 3rd-and-1 in the 1st when, yep, Joseph and Wells got pushed backward on an off-tackle dive. Calais Campbell blew up a Mason run at the 7 late in the game. While Zac Stacy stayed quarantined on the bench, the Rams showed no power running game, to the point they wouldn’t even run needing a yard to score at the end of the game and settled for FGs. The Rams don’t field a RB who can move a pile right now but they sure call a lot of plays thinking they have one. It’s as bad a fit as hiring Adriana Lima to model biohazard suits. The results just aren’t that sexy.

    * Receivers: Wish I had more to say here. I was surprised to see either Kenny Britt (5-65) or Stedman Bailey (5-74) had as many as five catches. Britt had a couple of catches over 20 yards, including a tough one while getting thumped by two guys late in the game, but it felt like he spent most of the night unable to get to deep balls Hill threw because Patrick Peterson had jammed him at the line. I like Britt and that he’ll make some tough, physical catches, but the Rams need a better deep threat than he is. Bailey helped spark them to their 2nd FG; he got behind Jarraud Powers and caught a 38-yard duck from Hill, then zipped down inside the 10 later on a reverse. A couple of plays later from the AZ7, though, it’s a Jeff Fisher WR playing Kevin Dyson, as Bailey caught a slant on 2nd-and-goal but got twisted down inside the 1. Barely a factor, Tavon Austin’s game (2-14, 1-8 rush) was disappointing compared to his last two. Same for Jared Cook, 3-22. Oh, Cook’s been able to get some separation lately; unfortunately it’s with two-handed shoves that draw flags from 40 yards away. Missed opportunities, one early for Kendricks, one for Bailey late, loom big. This receiving corps doesn’t have the talent to make up for those.

    * Offensive line: The Rams need significant upgrades at right tackle and center and they’re welcome to start looking right now if they want to. Davin Joseph does not get the job done in any aspect of the blocking game, and Wells doesn’t appear to have it any more as a run-blocker. On the first run of the damn game, Joseph’s beaten badly by Frostee Rucker to dump Mason for a huge loss. In the red zone they tried to run behind him again. Nothing. 3rd-and-1 at the 7, they tried to run behind Rodger Saffold but Wells and Joseph got pushed into the hole faster than Cunningham could hit it. Send in the FG unit. The issue became almost comical in the 3rd. Greg Robinson and Saffold would lead Mason out for a nice gain one play, then the next, the Rams would run behind Joseph, who’d get knocked backward and get Mason stuffed. The ugliness spread into the passing game and across the line. In the 2nd, Joseph and Wells double-teamed Dan Williams and he still knocked down a pass. In the 3rd, with the Ram left side double-teaming Calais Campbell, Larry Foote looped around an unsuspecting Robinson for Arizona’s first sack. On 3rd-and-3 the next drive, they couldn’t even handle a 3-man rush; Wells got beat to flush Hill, who only picked up 2 on the scramble. Later, Joseph completely whiffed on Reggie White, ER, Frostee Rucker, and Mason failed in blitz pickup, to get Hill dropped for an especially ugly 13-yard loss. That was it for sacks but not giving up ground. Wells got beat by Tommy Kelly to get Hill creamed. The Rams used reverses and warded off rare straight-up rushes to get down to the 7 in the 4th, but run-blocking failed epically again. Mason immediately ended up with a lot of traffic at his feet in the form of Joseph Barksdale diving at Campbell blowing up the play. Two plays later, they decided they couldn’t trust their run blocking from a yard out. If they were thinking about running right, they were more than likely correct. Send in the FG unit. In full pass mode at the end of the game, what’s the first thing Wells does? Turn around, look at Hill lined up in shotgun, and still snap the ball halfway to him. Hill still got them to midfield, then had to fire incomplete after Joseph again completely whiffed a block. The Rams’ last three plays, Arizona blitzed a DB off RT THREE PLAYS IN A ROW and he was not blocked a single time, leading to Powers’ pass deflection that essentially ended the game. Fortunately for Hill, Arizona’s game-long blitz pressure is reflected much more in incomplete passes than it is in sacks. But Davin Joseph does nothing that helps this team, and if he’s still starting the last two meaningless weeks of the season, if the Rams don’t have another guard who’s even worth a look as opposed to this failure of a RG, they should cut all their guards except Saffold after the season and start over. Wells still gets out well ahead of screens, but he’s also starting to look like he’s on his last legs. Time to get Barrett Jones in there. The Rams cannot get worse play out of that part of the line than they got this week. Time for an extreme makeover.

    * Defensive line: The Rams may not have allowed a TD for three games now, but this wasn’t a satisfying performance up front. It’s a battle to decide what was more disappointing: pass rush (only 1 sack) or run defense (143 yards to complete scrubs). Somebody named Stepfan Taylor gashed them for 17 on the opening play after Michael Brockers got double-teamed out of the hole and Mark Barron couldn’t fill it after getting crunched by Larry Fitzgerald. They held Arizona to 3 after the Mason fumble, but Robert Quinn started badly overpursuing at this point, giving up a couple of big holes, one that who? Ask Kerwynn Williams took for 10. A good run stop by Kendall Langford at the 5 helped save the Rams points. Pass rush died off in the 2nd. No one got close to Drew Stanton to prevent a 49-yard bomb to set up the 2nd Arizona FG. Quinn got pushed five yards past him. Stanton threw three times from the Ram 26 and wasn’t pressured at all on two of them, but the Rams got help from John Brown dropping a wide open pass. The front four continued to accomplish little in the 2nd while the secondary got the Cardinals off the field. They did prove able to get gashed by who? Ask Kerwynn Williams some more, though, once for 8 through a huge gap they left on purpose so Chris Long could get wide-9 leverage. No amount of leverage was helping the very quiet Long in this one. Lack of pass rush continued to kill the Rams in the 3rd. No one close to Stanton again as Michael Floyd drew a long DPI. They did sack Arizona out of FG range there. Aaron Donald and Eugene Sims stunted, and Donald not only got there for the sack, for the second time this season, the Rams knocked out Arizona’s starting QB. So what happens the next play? No rush at all, and somebody named Ryan Lindley hits Floyd to get Arizona back in FG range and then up 9-3. The Rams needed to stop the run to win the field position battle in the 2nd half but lost badly. Arizona opened one drive by trucking William Hayes and Alec Ogletree inside to blow open a 19-yard run for who? Ask Kerwynn Williams again. He opened the next drive with a 12-yard run. This consistently let Arizona get far enough downfield to pin the Ram offense deep with punts. Ottis Anderson, ER, Taylor, set up Arizona’s last FG with a 21-yard run. A stunt took Quinn right to him and he still whiffed. It was as bad a game as Quinn’s had all year. He got close to the QB maybe twice and overran a lot of plays. Long, who’ll I’ll grant is coming off a long-term injury, contributed little. Donald had several nice run-stuffs but Arizona still ran successfully double-teaming Brockers. The Rams lost this game big on both sides of the line.

    * Linebackers: The LBs made some good plays but not enough to help the struggling front four. The Ram blitz was not especially effective, and that’s mostly James Laurinaitis, Alec Ogletree and Mark Barron, who we might as well call a LB for this game. Barron blitzed and Fitzgerald wiped him out in the hole to spring Williams for 19 on the opening play, but Laurinaitis flushed Stanton on an A-gap blitz to shut down that drive. With Williams on the verge of catching a pass near the goal line in the 2nd, little doubt that Laurinaitis’ footsteps prevented the completion and forced a FG. Laurinaitis had some iffy run plays. Rob Housler deked him on a gimmicky pitch to keep a FG drive alive, and Williams ran through him (and T.J. McDonald and Rodney McLeod) for 6 to burn precious time off the clock at the end of the game. Alec Ogletree had some run fails of his own, getting blocked out of three of Arizona’s big second half runs, Williams’ 19 and 12 and Taylor’s 21. He did kill a drive in the 2nd with a good open-field stop of Fitzgerald and a play that should just be called an “Ogletree” because he does it so often, batting a pass down on a blitz. Ogletree was in on the Rams’ only sack, and run-blitzed Taylor for a big loss right before that, but it wasn’t enough to save the Rams another FG. Barron probably pressured Lindley when Jenkins nearly picked him off in the 3rd, but the bottom line is the LBs didn’t produce enough on the blitz and gave up too many big runs.

    * Secondary: Where have we heard this before? Janoris Jenkins gets burned deep twice and the Rams lose the game. In the 2nd, Michael Floyd just ran by him, and Rodney McLeod was well late to show up as usual, to burn the Rams for 49 and set up a precious FG. Jenkins helped give up another FG in the 3rd, getting beaten deep again by Floyd and contacting him well before looking back for the ball for a 36-yard penalty. Jenkins getting burned deep has become one of this season’s themes. I’ll just say I’m in no hurry to re-up his contract. Sadly for Jenkins, he had several near-misses trying to make up for those plays. In the 2nd, Stanton stared down Larry Fitzgerald and Jenkins jumped the route perfectly. A catch would have been a pick-six but he couldn’t make it. He nearly made a diving pick of a terrible Lindley overthrow in the 3rd but the ball came out ever so briefly. Late in the 4th, Jenkins even forced a Williams fumble that would have teed the Rams up for the winning TD but he whiffed on the recovery. The shame is that if you could take away the big plays, Jenkins had an excellent game and the Ram secondary had a brilliant game. They were all over every quick screen to Fitzgerald and held the admittedly-injured WR to a harmless 30 yards, probably the best game they’ve ever had against him. E.J. Gaines, Trumaine Johnson and Jenkins stuffed him on various plays. TruJo also tipped away a TD pass attempt in the 4th. Gaines did some hitting: he flipped Jaron Brown head over heels on an early crossing route and back body-dropped Taylor after a short gain in the 3rd. My favorite play of the night might have been when Stanton went into the end zone for Fitzgerald but he was stymied by not one, not two but THREE defenders. For once the Rams had a plan to stop Larry Fitzgerald, and executed it, and it was a major reason Arizona threw for only 139 yards and couldn’t dent the end zone. They got everything right but two plays. It’s a shame the rest of the team couldn’t provide them a larger margin of error.

    * Special teams: The punters were the stars of this show. Johnny Hekker (50.5) launched a bunch of near-60-yard blasts but tended to outkick coverage, which hurt when Ted Ginn returned one 41 yards in the 3rd. Will Herring saved a TD after Chase Reynolds and Daren Bates got wiped out by ONE blocker and Ginn embarrassed Cunningham in the open field. The good news is Arizona didn’t score off that. Drew Butler’s average was meager (36.5) in comparison, but he got so much hang time on his punts that he rendered Austin useless as a returner and repeatedly pinned the Rams deep in their end. I think Greg Zuerlein has his head (and leg) screwed back on straight, though the FGs he hit were glorified extra points. Keep crossing your fingers when he’s kicking from beyond 30.

    * Upon further review: Walt Coleman and crew got several calls right that the crowd booed very hard, but that doesn’t mean we got a well-called game. They called Barron offside on the opening series when he’d clearly gotten back, so the crowd went nuts in the 2nd when a Cardinal appeared to jump into the neutral zone without a call. We weren’t alone – Hill thought he had a free play and chucked a deep ball on 3rd down. I’ll be darned, though, if TV didn’t show the Cardinal stopping a fraction short of the line. Downfield OPI calls against Britt and Cook were unpopular but right, as was the long DPI on Jenkins. But Coleman let Arizona slide on a couple of calls you KNOW the Rams would get hammered on. They wasted time before the half reviewing whether Hill had thrown or fumble after getting whacked by Powers on 3rd down, but the detail of Powers striking Hill on the helmet went completely by everyone. Put the Rams in long FG range at the end of the half and this game feels a lot different. On the final punt return, Austin got CLOBBERED on the ground WELL after he was down with no call. That’s another 15 yards that would have made a big difference in the end game. Grade: C-minus

    * Cheers: The crowd was not bad for a stupid Thursday night game, around 50,000, and for once, I didn’t notice a ton of fans of the road team in the stands. We came across good and loud on TV but couldn’t draw more than one false start. The crowd’s hottest reactions were to some of Coleman’s calls, which turned out to be right, so that may not have left us looking like the world’s savviest fans. Phil Simms’ playing experience really shone through analyzing Hill’s play. I’m not a big fan, but we rarely if ever hear him do a Rams game, and it sounded like he really knew what he was talking about. And I beat Jim Nantz to the Kevin Dyson reference on Bailey’s goal line catch, so I’m keeping it. I think I may have mentioned before that I hate Thursday night games, but it was great to watch the Rams game again (artist suffering for art, remember?) with prime time production values like great camera angles and plentiful replays. I wonder how much prime time exposure we should expect for the Rams next year.

    * Who’s next?: Can it really be here already? Time has flown, and the next game up is the final home game of the season, and the Rams’ lease agreement, a throwback game against the New York Giants. You have to throw back a ways to the last time the Rams beat the Giants, too – 2001. The Rams may be 2-2 lifetime against Peyton Manning, but they’re 0-3 against brother Eli, who’s thrown 9 TDs in those games. The Giants have won the last five meetings.

    Rams fans still having nightmares of Plaxico Burress cruising through the Ram secondary may be forced to re-live them in the form of rookie wideout Odell Beckham Jr. Beckham has gone nuts the past six weeks, with 4 100-yard games and none under 90. The Giants are doing everything possible to get the ball in Beckham’s hands: end-arounds, quick screens, quick outs, comebacks, deep balls, punt returns, letting him throw… the Giant offense is bending for Beckham. Beckham has almost all the Giants’ offensive speed. That’s not to say they’re not balanced; Rashad Jennings gives them a good running game. 29 but without heavy mileage, Jennings is a smart, patient runner who will break a lot of tackles. The offensive line has struggled with injuries and inexperience all season, but may have gotten its act together the past couple of games. They look like a well-coached unit right now and they run-block well. They established Jennings early against Jacksonville, and with the Jagwires playing very vanilla soft zone defense in the first half, Eli Manning pitch-and-catched and play-actioned them to death on the way to a 21-3 lead. The Giants played like that for all four quarters in a blowout win at Tennessee, where the o-line was fantastic run-blocking and pass-protecting. The Giants convert 70% of their 3rd-and-short situations; this is an offense that can sustain drives. Eli’s still as accurate a passer as ever, he’s clicking with Beckham as well as he has clicked with any receiver and he is running things quite efficiently. The Giants will use a lot of no-huddle and quick, short-range passing, just the kind of attack that gives the Rams fits. Eli’s bugaboo has been turnovers; he has 20 this season. It will be imperative for the Rams to get in his face or get him running, which shoots the likelihood of a dumb play by Eli way up. Jacksonville got to him in the 2nd half of their game, which the Jagwires won, by press-covering Beckham and getting creative up front with stunts, twists, blitzes and unusual alignments. The Ram defense will be a big step up in competition, especially with Gregg Williams plotting schemes to confuse the Giants up front.

    The Giants have EIGHTEEN players on I.R., including two defensive ends, but that hasn’t kept them from getting after the passer; they’ve still got team sack leader Jason Pierre-Paul (7) and Damontre Moore (5), a very thunder-and-lightning combination. The Quinn-like Pierre-Paul has elite cornering speed and lean. He’ll line up just about anywhere and is a bad matchup for either Ram tackle. He’s hard enough to get hands on, then the Giants will line him up wide-nine and also make him hard to find with stunts. Moore plays like a force at times. He’s a strong bull-rusher and is good at knocking down passes. The Rams also need to keep a hat on LB Devon Kennard. He has four sacks the past two weeks, two of them coming completely unblocked on blitzes. Safety Stevie Brown is also an effective blitzer from out of a very hard-hitting secondary, though there’s a big drop-off at corner after Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie. The Giants’ weakness is run D, where they’re 30th in the NFL. Their LBs don’t make a ton of plays. Watching Denard Robinson run on them a couple of weeks ago makes me think they will be very worried about the speed of Tre Mason and Tavon Austin. At the same time, Pierre-Paul and budding star DT Jonathan Hankins have been solid on their side of the line, and Moore has been a pretty undisciplined run defender, which means the Rams will want to run… right. If that continues to mean Davin Joseph, so help me…

    So, welcome to the Better Than Their Record Bowl. The Giants have looked a lot better than 4-9 lately. The Rams looked better than 6-8 up to Thursday night. Concerns about Joseph aside, it’s up to Sack City to prove they’re better than 6-8 after this week. Will they run over the Giant o-line like they should, or will they let Eli pick them apart? The Rams are built around their pass rush winning them games. This one’s up to them to win.

    — Mike
    Game stats from espn.com

    #13655
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    I have never had any trouble with the idea of the Rams having Bradford in their plans
    …But I repeat… You can’t COUNT ON HIM as a starter. What do I mean by that?…
    …So, I come back to the real challenge. Keep Sam? OK. I have little problem with that in itself,
    though you simply have to EXPECT that he goes down…

    Well, from what little I’ve read, it seems
    that there aren’t a lot of examples of an NFL QB
    going down with 2 straight ACL tears. So, I’m
    not sure any Doctor is going to be able to predict
    what Sam’s future is likely to look like. How do
    teams make decisions when the medical experts
    are unsure?

    One wonders, at what point does a QB start
    looking like the old broken down Joe Namath.
    I dunno.

    I do know this about Fisher — he will be patient
    with Bradford, if the Rams do indeed keep him.
    I mean, i could see Fisher not even playing Sam
    until halfway through the season next year.

    Lots of possibilities. Big decisions coming
    for this franchise. Lots of unknowns.
    Obviously, the QB-issue will be the story
    of the offseason.

    The team should be complete after the draft
    and free agency next year — all the ‘other’ pieces
    should be in place.

    w
    v

Viewing 30 results - 811 through 840 (of 923 total)