NFL on having a season w/ pandemic (thread 1, to 7/17))

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle NFL on having a season w/ pandemic (thread 1, to 7/17))

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #117346
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    ==

    ==

    #117354
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117393
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117444
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Mike Garafolo@MikeGarafolo
    NFL teams would like to play two preseason games to get a read on their rosters and get ready for Week 1, though the NFLPA hasn’t signed off on that and is wondering if it’s wise to start mixing teams for games that don’t count in the standings.

    The NFLPA has been vocal about the health and safety of their players, and not just publicly. The union will continue to discuss whether it’s safe to play any preseason games.

    Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
    One thing lingering over the preseason sked is the need for an acclimation period. The NFL/NFLPA joint committee on health and safety recommended a 3-week ramp-up before helmets go on.

    Teams report July 28. Three weeks from that is Aug. 18. Preseason Week 2 starts Aug. 20. (1/2)

    Data shared to team docs in the aftermath of the 2011 lockout showed a significant league-wide uptick in Achilles and hamstring injuries. That’s what the committee is trying to avoid.

    So it might not wind up being 3 weeks, but there will be an acclimation period. (2/2)

    #117548
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Vincent Bonsignore@VinnyBonsignore
    I’ve been saying this for a while now. The sense I get is, while the @NFL hopes all fans are on board and in support of the socially conscientious decisions the league is making, I also don’t get the sense they are sweating the loss of some “fans” that might result.

    Dan Graziano@DanGrazianoESPN
    NFLPA held a 2-hour call today for player reps. Lots of info re: season plans. Players could face fines for conduct detrimental if they’re found to have spread COVID by engaging in “reckless” behavior away from the facility, such as eating out at restaurants or riding in Ubers.

    Other items from NFLPA call:
    -Meetings, media access likely to be virtual, not in-person.
    -Current proposal is to test every other day in camp, players pushing for daily testing. Public access to testing is a factor.
    -Players will stay in their homes, not team hotels, for camp.

    Sources said there is definitely some sentiment among players of, “Why are we playing at all if it’s this unsafe?” A ton of questions still have to be answered before they feel good about playing. There’s another NFLPA call scheduled for Friday for all players, not just reps.

    Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
    With the NFLPA still opposed to preseason games, one possible camp schedule the union has discussed:

    3 days: medical/equipment
    21 days: strength & conditioning
    10 days: unpadded practice
    14 days: practice (10 max/8 padded)

    Then it’d be straight into Week 1.

    Worth noting is this scenario as discussed by the NFLPA: Players would be divided into smaller groups initially, e.g. under 15 players for S&C and up to 40 in unpadded practices. That’d buy an extra month or so before all players are together in a higher-exposure setting.

    Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
    Btw, worth mentioning the NFLPA’s recommendation of cancelling preseason game will come with significant lost revenue. Teams will lose the gate, lose out on a lot of local TV money, plus the league’s network routinely posts its highest ratings in August, bc of the games.

    Some more notes from the NFLPA call …

    • Standard for contact tracing = being around someone for 10+ minutes at closer than 6 feet.

    • After players report, COVID cases will be “football injuries”, requiring guys be paid.

    • Handling of loss of revenue is being discussed.

    #117555
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117571
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117577
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117702
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Mike Garafolo@MikeGarafolo
    Last night @TomPelissero said the NFLPA told the NFL to “kick rocks” on the proposal to hold some 2020 salary in escrow. A well-placed player source tells me this morning the chances are “less than zero percent” the players will accept that. The union is firmly dug in.

    The players’ side believes the league has no legal position to hold this year’s money in escrow. The NFLPA is adamant about borrowing for future years to offset a potential salary cap drop in 2021. To them, flat caps for a few years > giving back money in 2020.

    #117743
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117745
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117798
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117821
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    NFL, NFLPA discussing plan for potential player opt-outs in 2020

    https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-nflpa-discussing-plan-for-potential-player-opt-outs-in-2020

    With veterans expected to report to training camps in 20 days, the NFL and NFL Players Association have a host of issues to continue to sort out before players return.

    Among the questions lingering in the air amid the COVID-19 pandemic is the potential for players opting out of participating in 2020.

    NFL Network’s Tom Pelissero reported Wednesday on NFL NOW that the league and union anticipate player opt-outs would be available, but would need to be communicated by a certain date.

    “My understanding is both the union and the league intend to have an opt-out for players who have either a pre-existing condition, family (members) with pre-existing conditions, just general concerns over COVID-19, would not want to play this season,” Pelissero said. “General managers were told on a call earlier this week there would be a specific date by which players would need to opt-out. That date is still to be determined.”

    We’ve seen players in the MLB and NBA opt to sit out as their respective sports return to play. It’s unclear how many NFL players would consider sitting an entire season. Several veterans, including the McCourty twins in New England and Stefon Diggs in Buffalo, recently have voiced concerns about playing amid the pandemic.

    With any potential opt-outs comes the question of how that would affect a player’s contract.

    Pelissero reported that possible tolling of contracts of players who opt out is still to be determined and is something that would need to be agreed to prior to the start of training camp

    #117833
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Ian Rapoport@RapSheet
    Update on where things stand 18 days out:
    — Almost everything is done and agreed to except for number of preseason games and testing protocols.
    — No fans will be at training camp, but teams can have up to two fan events at stadiums this preseason with strict protocols if allowed
    Other notes:
    — Where fans are allowed at games, they will wear face coverings.
    — Actual training camp schedule of practices can be tied to the preseason game questions, so not there yet.
    — The economics are not yet finalized, either.

    ==

    NFL, NFLPA still have major issues to negotiate

    NFL, NFLPA still have major issues to negotiate

    The NFL and NFL Players Association have approached the negotiations on the 2020 season like negotiations on a broader labor deal: Start with the easy issues, and then move to the difficult ones.

    As to football in a pandemic, the easy ones are done. The difficult ones remain.

    Ian Rapoport of the NFL reports that “[a]lmost everything is done and agreed to except for number of preseason games and testing protocols.” Those are two very significant issues, however.

    The NFL wants two preseason games, the NFLPA wants none, and the two sides are stuck at an impasse on the issue. The testing protocols remain a point of contention, given that the players want testing more frequently. Throw in the fact that it may not be easy to get results quickly (and that doing so could slow down the process of finalizing tests for the general public), it will not be a simple process to reach a consensus on how often testing will be conducted and how quickly teams and players reasonably will obtain results.

    Rapoport’s final point is this: “The economics are not yet finalized, either.”

    That’s perhaps the most significant remaining area of tension. It was Rapoport and his colleagues who first floated, under the umbrella of the league’s in-house media conglomerate, the notion of salary givebacks. Then, NFL Media reported on the fact that the league suggested placing 35 percent of 2020 player salaries into escrow, which will make it easier to claw back money later.

    The NFLPA recognizes that lost revenues now will impact salary-cap calculations later, but the suggestion that any player should take less in a season during which players will be assuming a greater risk is nonsensical. Plenty of the men who play in 2020 won’t even be in the league in 2021, whether due to injury, retirement, or erosion of skills relative to younger, cheaper options. Why take less now (while absorbing all the risks of football in a pandemic) so that there will be more later, if the players who take less now won’t be around to get more later?

    Taken together, these aren’t small issues. They are major points of contention that must be resolved before anything can happen. Meanwhile, rookies are due to report for COVID-19 testing in only nine days.

    That leads us back to the point that J.J. Watt made earlier this week on #PFTPM: What’s the rush? It makes much more sense to get it right and delay things a bit than it does to rush into a headwind that could blow down what ultimately could be a house of cards.

    #117838
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    John McClain , Houston Chronicle
    from https://www.houstonchronicle.com/texas-sports-nation/john-mcclain/article/Mailbag-Texans-2020-NFL-season-COVID-19-15398638.php?utm_campaign=CMS%20Sharing%20Tools%20(Premium)&utm_source=t.co&utm_medium=referral

    Q: I am starting to have serious questions about restarting professional sports. Players are testing positive for COVID-19 in baseball. I don’t hear much about football, but I have real concerns. After all, football is more contact-related with hard breathing and fluids. If even one player in any sport were to become seriously ill or die from COVID-19, that would be a tragedy. — Ronald J.

    A: Yes, it would, Ronald. Because NFL players haven’t reported, we have no idea how many have tested positive, but you can be sure when they report to camp, there’ll be many positive tests. The NFL wants the show to go on, so I expect the season to start on time without fans. As long as teams have enough healthy players, I think they’ll play. There’s a lot of money to be made. I do think there’ll be interruptions. We’d be foolish to think the season will go smoothly.

    Q: I don’t see the NFL, MBL, NBA or NHL playing this year. One does not have to be a medical researcher to see that the virus is not leveling off but is instead accelerating. I seriously doubt Division I college football will play as well. The owners can ride this out for a year and still pay their staffs. Likewise, all but the bottom-tier players can handle one year without a paycheck. Many minimum wage workers are having to do it. Those players who cannot should turn to their union for assistance. The union can tap the strike fund for those few who need it. Never thought I’d say this but missing sports these past four months has not brought the world to an end. Call 2020 a mulligan and shoot for 2021. — Eric R.

    A: Ultimately, you might be right, Eric, but players want to get paid. Because they’re young and healthy, most believe it’s worth the risk and want to earn their money. The owners are going to lose a lot of money without fans, so they’re determined to play unless there are so many positive tests they’re forced to shut down. I don’t see that happening. I think the players who test positive will be treated like injured players in that they’ll have to deal with it the best way teams know how.

    Q: It seems MLB has their protocol for testing in place like the PGA Tour. Do you know what the NFL is going to do? What happens if a star player like Deshaun Watson tests positive? I assume he’ll have to quarantine for two weeks. What happens if half the team tests positive? Do you think the NFL will play this year? I think we’ll know a lot more after training camp. — Glen K.

    A: I agree about training camp, Glen. Any player who tests positive has to be quarantined and can’t return until he has two negative tests. They’re hoping most players won’t be very ill or some will be asymptomatic and can return to play as soon as possible. I think Roger Goodell is determined to start the season on time. I’d delay it at least a month, including cancelling games if I had to. I think it’s ridiculous to start the second week of September. After the first weekend of games, if there are a lot of positive tests, Goodell will have to decide to play or delay.

    #117854
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #117870
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Tom Pelissero@TomPelissero
    The NFLPA sent the NFL an economic counterproposal, per sources:

    – No escrow of 2020 salaries
    – Flat salary cap of $198.2M for 2021
    – Spread revenue loss this year over 2022-2030 caps
    – All fully guaranteed money paid even if games are canceled

    Albert Breer@AlbertBreer
    the economics are still the big boulder to move. In a nutshell …

    • Looming ’21 cap drop is the issue.
    • NFLPA wants losses spread over future years.
    • NFL wants players to take a hit now.

    No one wants a cap drop in ’21. Good for no one — Players lose jobs, rosters get slashed. Either paycut or smoothing of the cap help solve that.

    Well, NFL once smoothed the cap before (’11-13). Guess what? Some owners hated it, felt it was an interest-free loan to players.

    Evan Koch@evankoch
    I often see those defending the owners say “they should make more, they are taking all the risk.” Welp…. This is that fabled risk being played out isn’t it? If they transfer their losses immediately to the players, they should also transfer gains immediately during boom years

    Mike Tanier@MikeTanier
    NFL owners are actually encountering “risk ” for the 1st time in their lives in many cases right now. So naturally they will act like operating in the red for a year or 2 is like losing the farm.

    #117912
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #118053
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #118084
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Dan Graziano@DanGrazianoESPN
    NFLPA prez JC Tretter: “We’ve had coaches say the protocols are too much to ask, coaches come forward and saying, ‘Everyone’s going to get sick, so we might as well all get sick together.’ Those attitudes can’t happen. There are consequences to getting sick.”

    #118086
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    #118095
    Avatar photozn
    Moderator

    Dan Graziano@DanGrazianoESPN
    THREAD: What I’ve learned today from sources on NFL/NFLPA reopening negotiations:

    -They’re ongoing, expected to continue thru the weekend.

    -Both sides believe, if the health/safety piece of the talks gets resolved, they can start camps and continue to discuss financial piece.

    Players still want daily testing, league doesn’t believe it’s necessary. (Actually worries it can create false sense of security.) Possible compromise involves daily testing at start of camp, phase into less frequent as people get more comfortable with the facility protocols.

    Players still want all preseason games eliminated, league continues to resist. Possible compromise involves going down to just one preseason game per team, but NFLPA doesn’t want any. Thinks it raises infection risk unnecessarily (i.e, the games don’t count)

    Both sides are dug in. especially on preseason games. Imo, nothing gets resolved and the nflpa files an expedited grievance against the league. I’m sorry, but that’s the way I see it play out unfortunately.

    ==

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.