Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 391 through 420 (of 465 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: relocation? relocation! relocation: #26870
    snowman
    Participant

    Did the recent hearing have anything to do with the pendulum’s movement?

    http://finance-commerce.com/2015/06/judge-hears-case-over-new-st-louis-football-stadium/

    Judge hears case over new St. Louis football stadium
    By: The Associated Press June 26, 2015 4:26 pm 0

    ST. LOUIS — A judge will decide whether a public vote is necessary on funding the construction of a new football stadium in downtown St. Louis, after hearing arguments in the case.
    It’s not known when St. Louis Circuit Court Judge Thomas Frawley will make his decision, though several attorneys said after a Thursday hearing that they expect a ruling soon, the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.
    At issue is a 2002 city ordinance that requires a public vote before using tax dollars on the replacement of the Edward Jones Dome, where the Rams play.
    A public board that operates the dome had claimed in its lawsuit against the city that the law is “overly broad, vague and ambiguous.” The board wants the court to rule that law doesn’t apply, conflicts with Missouri statutes or is unconstitutional.
    But city officials contend that the ordinance is valid and doesn’t contradict state law.
    Proponents of a new stadium hope for a quick ruling, since Gov. Jay Nixon’s stadium task force is relying on the city to pay for some of the bonds needed to build the proposed $985 million open-air, riverfront arena.

    Read more: http://finance-commerce.com/2015/06/judge-hears-case-over-new-st-louis-football-stadium/#ixzz3eTT366EL

    snowman
    Participant

    Weird that the Rams are ranked so high when it seems that most of my 44 years as a fan have been spent waiting for a them to find a great QB.

    I had the same thought.

    Of course, two of the three played before we were born.

    Then Warner was here today, gone tomorrow.

    And if the list were to extend beyond three, the Rams would still fare pretty well. There’s Gabriel, Hadl (albeit briefly), Everett (comparable to Romo, maybe?), and Bulger.

    Yet most of the past 44 years has felt like a QB drought.

    Zooey, I feel much the same way. We have had some very good QBs since Waterfield/Van Brocklin, but we did not have them very long. Felt like the QB spot was always unsettled.

    in reply to: JT: every penny of Gurley contract is guaranteed. #26551
    snowman
    Participant

    This is good information. I guess the league and the players union compromised – lower rookie salary structure for the first round picks in exchange for four years guaranteed.

    in reply to: time for the "how did you become a Rams fan" thread #26447
    snowman
    Participant

    I was seven or eight years old, laying on the living room floor watching the Vikings game with my Dad on a Sunday afternoon. We lived in a tiny town in northeast South Dakota. It was cold, grey and miserable outside, and everyone in the Viking game, including the fans, looked cold, grey and miserable. The players were blowing exhaust out of their mouths like dragons. The game ends at 3:00 pm and the second game comes on; always a west coast team. It’s the LA Rams hosting – I don’t remember. The LA Coliseum was brilliant white, the sky was blue, the field was green, the Hollywood Hills were brown – there was COLOR at this football game, by God! The Rams came on the field in the home white uniforms with the trademark horns, they looked big, fast and powerful and they played that way. I watched the game and before it ended, I chose them as my favorite team. That was 1968 or so.

    in reply to: Rams to open Riverfront Stadium in 2017 #26379
    snowman
    Participant

    It seems to me that cross ownership of other professional sports teams is one of those rules that is not enforced. It’s like jaywalking. There are 11 NFL owners, including Kroenke, who own other professional sports teams. Most of them are in the NBA and NHL, and it has been going on for a long time.

    The cross-ownership rules only apply if your other franchise or franchises are in the same place as another NFL team.

    I don’t know all of your examples, but, it seems to me that they don’t all fit that restriction.

    Yes, I updates my previous post with that condition. Though I don’t see how the Denver NBA and NHL franchises are in the St. Louis market.

    I am edit-happy today. Notice that Mike Ilitch’s teams are both in Detroit. And he looks like one of the walking dead. Better example – Paul Allen owns the Seahawks and the Trail Blazers, both in the northwest US.

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by snowman.
    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by snowman.
    in reply to: Rams to open Riverfront Stadium in 2017 #26375
    snowman
    Participant

    It seems to me that cross ownership of other professional sports teams is one of those rules that is not enforced. It’s like jaywalking. There are 11 NFL owners, including Kroenke, who own other professional sports teams. Most of them are in the NBA and NHL, and it has been going on for a long time.

    edit: the article says Kroenke transferred ownership of the Nuggets and Avalanche to his son Josh, thus complying with the NFL rule on cross ownership in the same market.

    http://thefieldsofgreen.com/2014/09/10/11-cross-sport-owners-of-major-professional-league-franchises/

    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by snowman.
    • This reply was modified 8 years, 11 months ago by snowman.
    in reply to: Wagoner articles on B.Jones, Barnes, & Rhaney #26331
    snowman
    Participant

    He is currently listed at 6′ 4″ and 308 lbs, so he is big enough. He has been in the weight room and has watched a lot of film, so he just needs to stay healthy. He is one of the guys who really needs to step up and play well for us. We need quality linemen to protect Foles and open holes for Gurley.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams lack a dominant offensive trio #26097
    snowman
    Participant

    Qualitative and speculative. Meh.

    dido

    Aeneas.

    Gesundheit.

    in reply to: Wagoner: Rams lack a dominant offensive trio #26083
    snowman
    Participant

    Qualitative and speculative. Meh.

    snowman
    Participant

    “…Kubiak also added: “We felt like ‘let’s start working him there today.’ …We’ll see what happens.”

    Looks like Peyton picked the wrong year,
    to Not retire.

    w
    v

    I am picturing Lloyd Bridges in Airplane!

    in reply to: happy birthday TSRF #25470
    snowman
    Participant

    Happy Birthday TSRF !

    Not sure that I know what TSRF stands for. I assume the RF stands for Rams Fan, but i dunno about the first two letters. Please choose one from the list below:

    Tomato Soup Rams Fan
    Texas Style Rams Fan
    Totally Smooth Rams Fan
    T. S. Eliot Rams Fan (The E is silent)
    T-Shirt Rams Fan
    someThing elSe Rams Fan

    It has to be one of these. Notice that there is no choice for “other”. 🙂

    in reply to: Happy birthday PA Ram #25300
    snowman
    Participant

    Happy Birthday PA Ram! How about a scrapple-cake?

    snowman
    Participant

    About the Rams, I was wrong about Tavon Austin for much the same reasons you felt wrong about Quick. I thought he would excel, at least as a return specialist. His receiving numbers were blunted by Bradford’s injury, but still, I fear he may too small for his speed or not fast enough for his size.

    About the NFL in general, I was wrong in thinking that the Patriots were finally going to some down to earth and be mediocre. They still won. I am waiting for them again this year to be middle of the pack, and they might without Brady for the first month of the season. For league security purposes, Belichick should be required to wear a body camera 24/7. What’s the German word for enjoying someone eles’s failure? I have that for the Patriots.

    in reply to: Happy birthday RFL #25151
    snowman
    Participant

    It’s gotta be nice to have your birthday on a three day weekend. Happy Birthday Mark!

    in reply to: Projected 2015 starters: St. Louis Rams #25103
    snowman
    Participant

    Did Mark Barron start at the free safety spot last year after we got him from Tampa? I don’t know if he is better than McLeod, but I thought we acquired him to at least compete with McLeod for that spot.

    snowman
    Participant

    I am shocked. I really thought Brady and the Pats would get away with it.

    in reply to: The next round of free agency #24427
    snowman
    Participant

    Thanks for posting that. I didn’t realize there was a cutoff date when signing and losing free agents did not factor into next year’s compensatory draft picks.

    in reply to: Deflategate c'est fini #24272
    snowman
    Participant

    I listened to Pat Kirwin and his sidekick on Sirius NFL radio this afternoon and they both damn near demanded that the NFL apologize to Brady and the patriots organization for wasting their time by investigating this issue. Made me sick, what a couple of Brady-sniffers.

    in reply to: teams on the rise after NFL draft #24113
    snowman
    Participant

    Waiting and hoping for at least one veteran FA signing for the OL. That would make our draft look better to the pundits.

    in reply to: days 1 & 2, general reactions #23665
    snowman
    Participant

    I really like this draft. A needed skill player in the first round, big offensive linemen in the second round and a developmental QB in the third round.

    Excellent trade down by Snead/Fisher to get the extra picks. Best move on day two. Other teams traded down but didn’t move as far as we did and didn’t get the quality of picks in return, and we still got quality players in areas of need.

    What a relief – no Alex Barron, no Brian Leonard, no Tye Hill!

    in reply to: Todd Gurley #23583
    snowman
    Participant

    It makes sense to me. Fisher has said he wants to build a power running team so this move fits that plan very well. He also does not draft offensive linemen this high because he believes they can be drafted later and developed. Outside of picking Robinson to be the LOT, he has been consistent in doing that going back to his years in Tennessee. I would not be surprise to see the Rams draft two or three offensive linemen in this draft. I would almost bet on them taking an OL in the third round, maybe fourth as well.

    in reply to: Marvel Rams become #23451
    snowman
    Participant

    I am Groot.

    snowman
    Participant

    wv, I agree with all of that and I hope it comes true. I can’t see taking a tackle at #10 if he is not going to be the starting left tackle in a year or less. That’s Robinson’s job now. It doesn’t make football sense and I believe that Fisher and Snead also believe that it doesn’t make sense.

    Outside of a game-changing defensive player or a left tackle to protect your QB, I have always felt that a top 10 or 12 pick int he draft should be a skill player on offense. You can’t coach speed and other rare natural abilities. You can’t coach instincts or football sense, that comes with experience. That’s just my bias, because I see other positions filled with mold-able, teachable players who become very good pros over time. We can coach up interior linemen and a right tackle, but we better draft a gifted skill player or game-changer on defense if he is available to us.

    in reply to: Draft trades still follow the chart #23265
    snowman
    Participant

    Cleveland or Philadelphia or any team can trade more than the picks they have in this draft to move up and take Mariota. That’s how we fleeced Washington for RGIII; we got three years worth of first-round picks. If I were Tennessee, I would rather be offered picks over two years rather than one. Next year’s draft might be deep in other positions of need that this year’s draft lacks. And how many rookies do they want at one time anyway? It gives them time to train up this year’s picks and plan ahead for free agents they may lose in 2016 and need to replace.

    But I do agree that trades still use and largely follow the value chart.

    in reply to: Possible Draft Day Move? Eagles trade Bradford? #23105
    snowman
    Participant

    I think you are right but I don’t think Bradford has much value in the FA market as a starter. And I doubt that a team (or Bradford) would sign him as a backup because that creates an immediate QB controversy.

    in reply to: Thomas: Boras’ profile with Rams grows #22758
    snowman
    Participant

    That’s a great story, thanks for posting it.

    in reply to: 2009 draft #22350
    snowman
    Participant

    A lot of disappointments in that draft. The Packers got it right though.

    snowman
    Participant

    I went to grad school at SUNY-Albany. They had a good lacrosse team and a bad football team. Good luck Brian Parker!

    in reply to: Change to extra points likely in NFL #21552
    snowman
    Participant

    There’s a lot in that article.
    Lots of stuff going on.

    “-Ted Wells’ investigation into the deflated footballs in the AFC championship game is ongoing, with no timetable on its conclusion.”

    Now why in the world would it be taking this long to investigate this?
    How long does it take to interview the people involved
    and look at the videos?

    w
    v

    I think that means the league really doesn’t care and they aren’t going to do anything meaningful anyway. It’s like answering your kids with, “We’ll see.”

    snowman
    Participant

    The Vikings played at the University of Minnesota last season while their new publicly-funded stadium in being built. So really, St. Louis is 31st in attendance.

Viewing 30 posts - 391 through 420 (of 465 total)