Herzog wrote:

I still believe we can do a complete 180 turn around….but I am also perplexed at the lack of readiness of this team.

Well, let’s just hope we don’t get overzealous and do a 360…

Well, so here’s a question… what if the MRI comes back and the Quad injury means Hill is out for 4-6 weeks?

It’s one thing to say, “well, it was because of Davis…we looked good with Hill…” and I buy that…kinda. I can sorta buy that the Rams can get right with Hill…maybe.

But how do the Rams get right if Hill is out for a few games?

Start Keenum?

I honestly don’t know the answer to this, but it sure isn’t an extra dose of Austin Davis…

Can Fisher lose the Rams locker room and can the Rams be that “distracted”??? Soon?

This is GRITS’ issue. I don’t take it personally. I think with all the stadium situations getting resolved, it’s why LA has gotten an executive assigned to it by the NFL. Without LA as much of a bargaining chip for multiple teams, it’s really just vast wealth going untapped.

Sack City? That’s the worst name for a defense…ever.

Does that make female fans, #bagladies? turrible…

We need to help the Rams find a new name for this defense…Pronto!

I agree. I mean if Quick and Britt just play like they did in Preseason, then that allows Austin to do SO MUCH MORE than he could last year (other than the one man show he put on in Miami). And with Bailey improving as well…oof.

Makes it hurt that much more for Bradford, but instills that much more confidence in Shaun Hill.

So, yeah, I really do see the Rams being able to score 25 a game.

Why am I surprised that reporters don’t have the background that we do? I don’t know who asked the question, but when I was 10 years old, I loved…LOVED baseball and knew the starting lineup and the starting rotations of every team in the league. So, I still just can’t figure how a sports reporter who is meant to cover a sport can’t quickly do some background and not ask really asinine questions.

I just don’t get it. That answer was on ESPN stats, fer cryin out loud. 30 seconds on his/her iPhone or Droid would have been enough to know the answer. I’m specifically referring to the reporter asking about the “first opening day?” question. smh

Well there’s an ebola outbreak now… should be put the answer in the form of an outbreak?

Crass, too true. But black humor plagues me today.

See?

I love it. The league is underestimating us.

We’re poised to roflstomp the league in part because I really and truly think there will be teams and staffs that think like this. They’re human and part of these rankings are informed by interviewing league personnel and performing casual polling.

The idea that the Rams are thought of so casually is great for the Rams. It can take a full year for teams to really wrap their heads around that a team isn’t as weak as they thought…

I was just funnin’ with ya. I knew it wasn’t that cut and dried…

Part of me wanted to do that, but I just didn’t because… I’d just get too mad about it.

The adage holds true, “don’t ask a question you don’t want the answer to” and I already pretty much knew the answer. To KNOW the answer with actual players… well, that would make it harder, I think…

As I feared, the league doesn’t have room for Sam.

Now the “apology” stories are coming out about “but, but, but…it’s not over for Sam…don’t stop clicking on Michael Sam stories…” trying to say that practice squads are fluid and he could be picked up at any time.

All that’s true… in the abstract. Then again, so could Tim Tebow.

In reality, they both now seem to have about the same chance of making a squad.

Only, Michael Sam can play his position pretty well.

I found it fitting that Michael Sam sacked Johnny Manziel because he’s looked like the ultimate bust. Manziel’s probably going to break their hearts and get multiple chances in the league. I generally don’t play the “fair” card, but THAT’S just unfair…

The onion… both impresses and depresses… at the same time.