Great find. Thanks for posting it!

zn wrote:

PA Ram wrote:

Read other sources with an open mind. Question things. You question climate science. Question this to the level you do that.

Some people are so seriously and deeply partisan that those are wasted words. No one “questioned” climate science, they bought into a partisan view of it. And on the other stuff you say to question–it will be the same thing. Partisan first. Partisan uber alles.

Scientists in the know certainly question man made global warming. That is not the same as “climate science”. Climate science is the euphemism applied to the continually discredited predictions of the man made global warming crowd.

PA Ram wrote:

bnw wrote:

PA Ram wrote:

Does it bother you at all that the new NSA believed a crazy conspiracy involving Clinton of some insane child sex ring from the some pizza shop?

Why is it crazy? Sex trafficking is real. Bill Clinton made numerous trips to a known pedophile’s “Pleasure Island” on the the pedophile’s private jet the “Lolita Express”. Podesta from the wikileaks is an apparent satanist. Hildabeast latched on to a 19 year old Huma to become a power couple. Very odd. Now about Pizzagate I don’t know. I know it is a real thing in the UK.

About Sandy Hook I’ve only responded to the gun control efforts it had spawned since there is a poster here from Newtown who has made it clear they have suffered tangentially from the tragedy. So out of respect I will not discuss nor dissect Sandy Hook.

BNW, I say this without trying to make anything personal, but you seriously need to read WHY this was fake news. I don’t know where you’re gathering information but you should get out of that bubble and investigate these things further–see where they came from. You are getting stuck in a conspiracy web. And you aren’t alone. That’s not good for anyone.

The pizza story grew because someone thought that they mentioned pizza a lot in the wikileaks. From there we get Comet Ping Pong pizza and a child sex ring. It is truly bizarre.

Read other sources with an open mind. Question things. You question climate science. Question this to the level you do that.

The wikileaks contained code words as identified by the FBI to pertain to trafficking children to pedophiles. That is the genesis of Pizzagate.

NewMexicoRam wrote:

1. Coaching. Fisher doesn’t know offense so he has poor ability to monitor the OC.
2. O-line. My pet peeve for over the last 10 years. Our new HC must know how to develop an O-line, as well as his OC and OL coaches.
3. Defense. I’m not sure what is wrong. But to have such a roller coaster isn’t right.

Very good points. What other team would keep Saffold around as long as the Rams?

PA Ram wrote:

Does it bother you at all that the new NSA believed a crazy conspiracy involving Clinton of some insane child sex ring from the some pizza shop?

Why is it crazy? Sex trafficking is real. Bill Clinton made numerous trips to a known pedophile’s “Pleasure Island” on the the pedophile’s private jet the “Lolita Express”. Podesta from the wikileaks is an apparent satanist. Hildabeast latched on to a 19 year old Huma to become a power couple. Very odd. Now about Pizzagate I don’t know. I know it is a real thing in the UK.

About Sandy Hook I’ve only responded to the gun control efforts it had spawned since there is a poster here from Newtown who has made it clear they have suffered tangentially from the tragedy. So out of respect I will not discuss nor dissect Sandy Hook.

zn wrote:

bnw wrote:

ou mean like those all over the MSM stating Hildabeast has a 97% chance of winning?

That’s a dodge.

Let me let you in on something. You’re among leftists. We see through the MSM in ways you’ve never even dreamed of.

What we DON’T do however is act like only partisan bot sites have the truth.

It is possible to put up credible evidence for the stupid claim you made do it. And stay away from the laughable slogans like in the post I respond to here.

Evidence. No dodges, quips, or slogans. Evidence.

.

I gave the link. READ IT. There’s your evidence. I know how you see the MSM as you’ve made that clear for quite some time. You see it as “credible” since you always claim it presents the “facts” and the “truth”. I know that the election results having relied upon the MSM as you do must have been quite a blindsiding for you. However to run with the latest MSM meme of “Fake News” is beyond laughable. It is pathetic. So partisan. So transparent. Fake news is what the MSM has been feeding you for decades. Truth exists simply where it is found. That filter between your ears should go a long way towards identifying it, or at least keeping it within the realm of the plausible to be determined with the passage of sufficient time.

Now about Hildabeast corrupting the electoral vote through intimidation of individual electors and through collusion with Stein to prevent electors from Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin from voting altogether, it still won’t work. No amount of Clintonista dirty tricks or blackmail will change the fact that congress has the final say in accepting the Electoral College vote.

The hypocrisy of the liberals given what they said about Trump merely wanting to wait to decide whether he would contest the election is quite rich. Everything from sore loser to threatening the very existence of the republic was hurled at him for weeks. Yet none of that in the MSM about Hildabeast. Times are a’changin and the MSM went for broke against Trump and now find themselves out in the cold their already plummeting viewership to fall faster once he is sworn in. It is long overdue.

“Fake News”. The last gasp of those proven to be lying propagandists and insignificant.

Amazing.

This offense needs Mike Martz.

He should be great since he gets enough opportunity year after year.

wv wrote:

I mean what would you predict sentient-beings would be like
on a Planet-of-Lies ?

w
v

Those who watch CNN and those who read the New York Times and believe they are informed.

Zooey wrote:

bnw wrote:

zn wrote:

zn wrote:

I DO care, in terms of the subject of this thread, about a president making a fundamentally important policy decision that is clouded by his own direct financial conflict of interest.

Trump sells his stake in Dakota Access Pipeline developer: https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trump-sells-stake-dakota-access-193419610.html

So he already had sold his stake of between $15K -$50K. To him that is peanuts. Lets assume his net worth is $1 billion. $50K is 5% of $1 million. Therefore $50K is 0.0001% of $1 billion. So to put that in perspective of a guy whose net worth is $200K (house paid off or considerable equity, savings, personal property etc.) that is $20. Yes, $20. Insignificant. It is why discussing this stuff with liberal minds is so frustrating.

And the reason it is frustrating to discuss this stuff with conservative minds is that you made up your mind to defend Trump well before you knew how big of a stake he had in the pipeline, and would be undeterred in your defense of him if it was $80 million. And, of course, it took a “liberal” to bring you the facts in the first place.

No, I merely understand how much $1 billion is. I realize that billionaires are invested all across the board and DO NOT KNOW individual assets at any one time since they employ people to do that. Defend Trump? No. I merely correctly assumed liberals making another ridiculous charge against Trump. I wasn’t disappointed.

The Rams have a very offensive line.

zn wrote:

zn wrote:

Peter King

Eric Dickerson… reminds me a lot of another big star openly criticizing the team he made famous—Joe Namath versus the Jets.

‘

According to the logic of the syntax there, Dickerson like Namath made his team famous.

Like…there were no Rams stars before Dickerson?

Yeah cause until 1983 and Dickerson, guys like Olson, Jones, and Youngblood labored in forgotten obscurity?

…

Today around the NFL compared to Dickerson, yes, obscurity. There’s also the Offense vs. Defense thing exacerbated by the rules emphasizing offense, fantasy football ignoring defensive players etc.

Seen this before. Its called “Minority Report”.

zn wrote:

bnw wrote:

Sorry he isn’t mired in poverty for you.

Well that was a gigantic red herring.

I could give a crap about his money.

I DO care, in terms of the subject of this thread, about a president making a fundamentally important policy decision that is clouded by his own direct financial conflict of interest.

Fundamentally important policy decision my ass. Where were you democrats giving a shit about Buffet dangerously shipping oil by the train car directly through towns and at a far higher cost? Was there an EIS or even an EA for that given existing rail lines? Would like to see the safety implications if any that were identified.

Yeah thats right,

Silence.

Trump will look at the merit of the COE decision. Until a decision is made its nothing but conjecture.

• This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by bnw.
• This reply was modified 7 years, 11 months ago by bnw.