Mackeyser wrote:

Here’s what needs to be understood. We’ve had the 15 contiguous hottest years on record WHILE THE SUN WAS PUTTING OUT LESS AND LESS ENERGY.

Not true. The earth has cooled. The data gathered and used has always been flawed once there became an agenda to be followed and an ideology to be defended. Hockey stick, much?

Periods of global warming have always been periods of prosperity for mankind. Global cooling is what is to be feared. Always has been. History proves it. That elevation of CO2 and other so called greenhouse gases by your logic is what staves off the next ice age. That is a good thing.

Why keep Foles? He needs to leave.

Cal wrote:

And IF you can say the electorate in NY 40 years ago was mainly white like Washington now, then can’t you say what has largely changed the democratic party is the black voice?

This should be helpful.

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/04/blacks-and-the-democratic-party/

Good news!

BS. Do the math. He didn’t grow up watching Everett. He would have watched Warner and Bulger.

Rams were dead last in passing last season. Should do better this season perhaps in the high teens? This year should be fun and finally 9-7 or better. 2017 and 18 watch out. This Rams team will be elite. Because I say so.

Agamemnon wrote:

Our guys don’t surrender. You have to taser them!

Yeah! Even then that battery better be fully charged! Take that you SOB Arians!

• This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by bnw.
• This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by bnw.

Yes it does!

Why not at 7 PM ET? I’ll be watching the draft on TV at 8 PM ET. I think I’ll watch one of the Rams wins over Seattle last season on Gamepass after the Rams pick. Need to be mentally prepared for sweeping the Seahawks from now to forever.

• This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by bnw.

PA Ram wrote:

My only motivation is fear of a Trump Presidency. I probably won’t know for certain which way I’ll go until I step in the voting booth in November. I won’t feel good either way when I come out.

Why do you fear a Trump presidency? Would you rather have more war? Do you want less jobs brought back to the US? Would you rather have corporations move to other countries then sell their product here with no consequences? Are you against allowing corporations to bring cash back into the US to spur job growth? Is it wrong to have US citizens irradiated every time they board a plane with their identification and in case of foreign travel their passport and proof of immunization while illegal immigrants merely walk in with the assistance of the US government?

Clinton loves war. Clinton loves shipping US jobs around the world. Clinton loves big money. Like a fly on shit Clinton can’t resist big money. She isn’t trustworthy and much like Bush in ’00 only worse the Democratic Party couldn’t field any reasonable opposition to her? They had to let Bernie in just to make it look like an election? Why not say no to that oligarch?

• This reply was modified 8 years, 6 months ago by bnw.

Zooey wrote:

bnw wrote:

Zooey wrote:

bnw wrote:

Hillary will have to pardon herself to not be president in federal prison.

Well, if they are going to indict her, I hope it’s sooner than later. Like in the next couple of weeks. And I hope they DO indict her because we are past the two minute warning on the environment, wealth disparity, and democracy.

There’s slam dunk evidence against her and it is all Gov. 101 stuff.

I’ll just wait for the FBI, if you don’t mind. There are people who believe Benghazi and Vince Foster etc were all slam dunk crimes, too.

I don’t mind. The email stuff is slam dunk. You can’t conduct government business on a private server. You can’t send classified materials in an unsecured manner. You can’t instruct someone to cut off a classification header and then send it whether by secure or unsecured means. That is three slam dunks and I know I’m missing some others. Like I said this is Gov. 101 stuff.

Zooey wrote:

bnw wrote:

Hillary will have to pardon herself to not be president in federal prison.

Well, if they are going to indict her, I hope it’s sooner than later. Like in the next couple of weeks. And I hope they DO indict her because we are past the two minute warning on the environment, wealth disparity, and democracy.

There’s slam dunk evidence against her and it is all Gov. 101 stuff.

I thought you meant Jarts. The term jorts is news to me.

wv wrote:

WHY was Mike Martz working them both out?

I dont think i understand what role he
was playing there.

w
v

My guess is since Martz is recognized as a QB guru the agent of any QB expected to be drafted early would want him to be able to answer questions from teams considering working them out.