Forum Replies Created
-
Forgetting the election for a moment…is there any
hope for the diminishing or eradication of racism/jingoism/fundamental-superstition-ism ?I mean millions of amerikans are drenched from day-one
in racism/jingoism/superstition. I mean, its not just in a few magazines
laying around the house — they are drenched, inundated, surrounded and drowned in racism-jingoism-superstition.This is a common refrain from many of my clients:
Q: How did you get involved in the Aryan Brotherhood?
A: Oh, grand-daddy was in it, Daddy was in it, when i was eight years old
i went to all the bar-b-ques and stuff….its just all Ive known. Its my family.How and why does ‘that’ happen?
w
vLook on the bright side. They know who their daddy is.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
BS. Trump employs common sense not emotion.
Even if that is true, it is irrelevant.
Racism is about policy, not “feelings.”
And his policy proposals are racist. Clearly. Emphatically.
Wrong again. His proposals are common sense. Keep beating that racist drum. But it isn’t effective. People want solutions to problems.
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 4 months ago by
.
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 4 months ago by .
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
I hear the pressure may be on to remove Hillary’s security clearances. Not like that would prevent her from top clearances as President, but it is interesting to review the security clearances information at the Bureau of Diplomatic Security at the State Dept:
Guideline K:
Handling Protected Information33. The Concern. Deliberate or negligent failure to comply with rules and regulations for protecting classified or other sensitive information raises doubt about an individual’s trustworthiness, judgment, reliability, or willingness and ability to safeguard such information, and is a serious security concern.
34. Conditions that could raise a security concern and may be disqualifying include:(a) deliberate or negligent disclosure of classified or other protected information to unauthorized persons, including but not limited to personal or business contacts, to the media, or to persons present at seminars, meetings, or conferences;
(b) collecting or storing classified or other protected information in any unauthorized location;
(c) loading, drafting, editing, modifying, storing, transmitting, or otherwise handling classified reports, data, or other information on any unapproved equipment including but not limited to any typewriter, word processor, or computer hardware, software, drive, system, gameboard, handheld, “palm” or pocket device or other adjunct equipment;
(d) inappropriate efforts to obtain or view classified or other protected information outside one’s need to know;
(e) copying classified or other protected information in a manner designed to conceal or remove classification or other document control markings;
(f) viewing or downloading information from a secure system when the information is beyond the individual’s need to know;
(g) any failure to comply with rules for the protection of classified or other sensitive information;
(h) negligence or lax security habits that persist despite counseling by management;
(i) failure to comply with rules or regulations that results in damage to the National Security, regardless of whether it was deliberate or negligent.35. Conditions that could mitigate security concerns include:
(a) so much time has elapsed since the behavior, or it happened so infrequently or under such unusual circumstances that it is unlikely to recur or does not cast doubt on the individual’s current reliability, trustworthiness, or good judgment;
(b) the individual responded favorably to counseling or remedial security training and now demonstrates a positive attitude toward the discharge of security responsibilities;
(c) the security violations were due to improper or inadequate training.Well under Guideline K we know that Hildabeast has not complied with-
33.
34. a,b,c,e,g,h, probably i
35. a,bTerribly pathetic record to be sure but there is no minimum ethical foundation required for president. She could fail every single part of Guideline K and still be president with the highest access supposedly to everything.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
BS. Deleting emails is destroying government property. Extreme carelessness is a criminal offense for we but not for she. That includes all who participated in the email scandal which includes Obama.
This is kind of funny. In reality, no one in private life would be sent to jail for deleting emails. Or fined. Or even brought to trial. At worst, they’d be fired by their employer, and even that would be rare. Only government employees are held to such a standard — which, of course, has never been implemented for any previous SoS.
I think some people are getting a bit carried away due to hatred of Clinton. They’re losing all perspective. And I say that as someone who doesn’t like her either.
My perspective is fine. Deleting 30,000 emails by scrubbing all the servers and then lying her ass off about EVERYTHING regarding the emails isn’t funny.
Anyone working with sensitive government documents including emails whether employed by the government directly or as a contractor is given the same talk about the proper care and handling . The State Department was not immune from that talk and the legal ramifications of noncompliance.
You simply do not know the first thing about this topic. I do. My wife does too. Our friends and coworkers do as well. We’ve sat through the lectures. We’ve seen the degree to which even business sensitive files are managed/tracked. To think that peoples lives were put at risk and that SAP information was handled in that manner is incomprehensible. No one in such a position of trust including Hildabeast supporters can believe she got away with it. No one. The precedent set is incredible.
The upside to being a Rams fan is heartbreak.
Sprinkles are for winners.
-
This reply was modified 8 years, 4 months ago by
