Worst Offense in History?

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Rams Huddle Worst Offense in History?

  • This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Avatar photowv.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #35367
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Stat from Bernie. I just thot it deserved its
    own little thread.
    w
    v

    ================
    Bernie:

    “…The Rams are 31st among 32 teams in offensive points per game (14.4), 31st in touchdowns from scrimmage, and are last in the NFL in passer rating (69.8), yards per passing attempt (6.0), completion percentage (56.0), net passing yards per game (178), total net yards from scrimmage per game (305), and third-down conversion rate (24.5 percent.)

    Since STATS LLC began tracking third-down success rates as an official league statistic in 1972, the Rams’ current percentage rate ranks No. 1,294 on a list of 1,297 teams. Only 1976 Tampa Bay (24.4), 2002 Dallas (24.0) and 2005 San Francisco (24.0) were worse.

    But it’s close, and the Rams have a chance to be the NFL’s most futile third-down team since ’72.

    #35369
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    We didn’t start off as the worst offense in history. We had to work on it. 😉

    Agamemnon

    #35370
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    We didn’t start off as the worst offense in history. We had to work on it.

    Yeah, I vaguely remember, in a galaxy far away, eons ago,
    an opening game against Seattle where i actually
    praised the offense, and the mid-range passing attack.

    I’m thinking the next Seattle game, might
    be so bad the offense will score in Negative-numbers.
    Has that ever happened? Has an offense ever
    actually broke through the fabric of algebra
    and scored in Minus-Integers ?

    w
    v

    #35374
    Avatar photonittany ram
    Moderator

    I’m thinking the next Seattle game, might
    be so bad the offense will score in Negative-numbers.
    Has that ever happened? Has an offense ever
    actually broke through the fabric of algebra
    and scored in Minus-Integers ?

    w
    v

    Well, we’ll never know because Boras probably already has this thing figured out. They’ll probably hang 40 on the Seahawks.

    #35401
    Avatar photoAgamemnon
    Participant

    Believe it or not, Rams’ offense has been worse recently
    3h

    Nick Wagoner, ESPN Staff Writer

    http://espn.go.com/blog/st-louis-rams/post/_/id/24650/believe-it-or-not-rams-offense-has-been-worse-recently

    EARTH CITY, Mo. — To be sure, new St. Louis Rams offensive coordinator Rob Boras faces an uphill battle in taking over an abysmal offense that ranks near the bottom of the league in many categories.

    Boras is charged with the unenviable task of helping an offense that’s consistently failed to move the ball, let alone score points.

    Through 12 games, the 2015 Rams rank 31st in yards per game (296.3) and offensive points per game (14.4), 32nd in passing yards per game (178.0), third-down conversion rate (24.5 percent) and first downs (175), and tied for 30th in offensive touchdowns (18).
    Quarterback Nick Foles hasn’t played as well as the Rams hoped he would. AP Photo/L.G. Patterson

    But as difficult as Boras’ job is in the final four games, it’s amazing to think this isn’t even the worst Rams offense of the past eight years. It’s probably not even second-worst, and might not even make the medal stand.

    An offense that once earned the “Greatest Show on Turf” moniker has fallen so far. Here’s a look at the current offense and some others of recent vintage that have actually been worse.

    * Perhaps the worst offense since the Rams moved to St. Louis in 1995 was the 2009 group. They finished 29th in yards per game (279.4), 28th in passing yards per game (167.8) and third-down conversion rate (32.3 percent), and last in offensive points per game (10.5). Although some of those rankings are better than the current ones, the overall output is still worse in every category except third-down conversion rate.

    * Coming in a close second to the 2009 offense is the 2011 unit. They were 31st in yards per game (283.6), 30th in passing yards per game (179.4), and last in third-down conversion rate (28.1 percent) and offensive points per game (10.9).

    * Perhaps the best comparison, at least in terms of numbers, for this year’s offense is the 2008 Rams. That group finished 29th in offensive points per game (14.1), 27th in total yards (287.2), 26th in passing yards per game (184.2), and 29th in third-down conversion rate (31.9 percent).

    In going back through the numbers since the Rams’ last .500 season in 2006, the common thread has been an anemic offense that ranks in the bottom third of the league in most major categories. Perhaps that shouldn’t be a surprise for a team that hasn’t had good quarterback play since Marc Bulger was healthy, features an offensive line that seems to need an overhaul every offseason, and has lacked a No. 1 wideout who can consistently create separation since Torry Holt was in his prime.

    That isn’t to say the Rams need to ignore the defense moving forward, or that the offense will ever get back to the “Greatest Show” days, but there’s no doubt that for this franchise to return to prominence, the offense must once again become a priority.

    Agamemnon

    #35402
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well, i remember those other offenses,
    and i think this one is even worse.
    Granted, the others were awful.
    But this one is awful with the Rams
    Number ONE QB.

    Then again, its possible I find this
    group unwatchable because…its…year…FOUR.

    w
    v

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.