Why Trump isn't following in Nixon's footsteps

Recent Forum Topics Forums The Public House Why Trump isn't following in Nixon's footsteps

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #86109
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    I keep reading these posts and articles about how Trump is cooked, and the whole Republican Party is going to go to jail, and so on. There is an assumption that all of Trump’s offenses are already over the line for any rational observer, and that when more is revealed, nobody will be able to deny that the man is a villain.

    But FOX barely mentioned the payments to Cohen. Here’s an important video from Ezra Klein on this. I can’t find a link to the video anywhere but Facebook, so it’s all I can offer:

    The big problem with comparing Trump to Nixon

    This is an important distinction.

    Posted by Ezra Klein on Saturday, May 12, 2018

    #86117
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    Well before we even get to the changed landscape between now and the 70’s — there’s the issue of THE TAPES. Nixon taped himself doing all this shit. Without that unique dynamic, Nixon would have stonewalled and survived.

    But as to the video — 70 percent of Americans trusted the MSM back in the 70s. Was that a ‘good‘ thing? Good ole days of trusting the corporate media?

    I agree with the commentator that things are a dumpster-fire now. And i agree that things have changed with the rise of the rightwing-lie-machine.

    But things were not good in the olden days either. It was a different kind of dumpster-fire back in the 50’s, 60s, and 70s, etc. Back then i was listening to TV-MSM and i was being mislead every night. (Now, with the internet I have at least a small chance of finding my way toward the light.)

    I think the vid makes some good points about the change, but where I’d disagree is that he kinda tries to make the case that the MSM was more truthful back in the 70’s — because there was hardly any rightwing media. But i think the MSM has always been in the pocket of the Corps, as Chomsky talked about in the 80’s in Manufacturing Consent. Its just that now we have the Right-MSM lying to us from the right, and the Dem-MSM lying to us from the ‘left’. What do we do with that?

    Its also been my experience that Tucker Carlson (wacko that he is) is sometimes way more insightful on some issues than the Dem-MSM. On Syria for example. What to do with ‘that’ ?

    To me the voters are staggering toward catastrophe because they DO trust EITHER Fox OR NPR/MSNBC. They ought look at both behemoths as Factories-Of-Lies. But they trust one or the other. They ‘say’ they dont trust the MSM but they do — they trust one of the lie-machines. Or the other.

    Used to be we had one lie machine. Now we have two. So yes, things have changed.

    Just my opin-yun. Call me Mary Sunshine.

    w
    v

    #86120
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    I think Trump benefits greatly from the ginormous volume of his misdeeds, his criminality, his buffoonery, and the way the MSM has chosen to overwhelm the nation with this. The sheer volume acts as a kind of shield for Trump, because people tune it out. If there were fewer scandals, with greater intervals between them, I think people would concentrate more on them in isolation, and any one of them could bring him down. But it’s like we’re surfers who keep getting knocked off our boards by massive wave after massive wave, and we barely have time to come up for air, much less actually contemplate the corruption.

    I think if people really could step back, pull all of this together, and just calmly, dispassionately review, they’d have to come to the conclusion that Trump is easily the most crooked, corrupt and aggressively odious president to ever enter the White House, and it’s only gotten worse since he’s been in office.

    In short, he’s not in jail right now primarily because he’s done too MUCH to sort out and pull together. A kind of “too big to jail” scenario.

    #86122
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Well before we even get to the changed landscape between now and the 70’s — there’s the issue of THE TAPES. Nixon taped himself doing all this shit. Without that unique dynamic, Nixon would have stonewalled and survived.

    But as to the video — 70 percent of Americans trusted the MSM back in the 70s. Was that a ‘good‘ thing? Good ole days of trusting the corporate media?

    I agree with the commentator that things are a dumpster-fire now. And i agree that things have changed with the rise of the rightwing-lie-machine.

    But things were not good in the olden days either. It was a different kind of dumpster-fire back in the 50’s, 60s, and 70s, etc. Back then i was listening to TV-MSM and i was being mislead every night. (Now, with the internet I have at least a small chance of finding my way toward the light.)

    I think the vid makes some good points about the change, but where I’d disagree is that he kinda tries to make the case that the MSM was more truthful back in the 70’s — because there was hardly any rightwing media. But i think the MSM has always been in the pocket of the Corps, as Chomsky talked about in the 80’s in Manufacturing Consent. Its just that now we have the Right-MSM lying to us from the right, and the Dem-MSM lying to us from the ‘left’. What do we do with that?

    Its also been my experience that Tucker Carlson (wacko that he is) is sometimes way more insightful on some issues than the Dem-MSM. On Syria for example. What to do with ‘that’ ?

    To me the voters are staggering toward catastrophe because they DO trust EITHER Fox OR NPR/MSNBC. They ought look at both behemoths as Factories-Of-Lies. But they trust one or the other. They ‘say’ they dont trust the MSM but they do — they trust one of the lie-machines. Or the other.

    Used to be we had one lie machine. Now we have two. So yes, things have changed.

    Just my opin-yun. Call me Mary Sunshine.

    w
    v

    Good point about the tapes.

    We agree about so much of the above . . . but I part ways with you on the concept of a Dem-MSM and a right-wing MSM. Though I’m probably misreading you . . .

    I don’t see NPR or MSNBC as necessarily pro-Dem or anti-Republican. I see some individual water-carriers for the Dems, like Maddow and Hayes, but if you look at their entire lineup, it leans to the right. They have as many conservative hosts as so-called “liberal” hosts. It’s just that their conservatives can’t stand Trump, but they don’t support the Dems, at all.

    NPR is deathly afraid of offending conservatives, so it tends to be as straight down the middle as possible, which will always skew reality. The reality is, from empirical evidence, that the right’s view of the world, on down to its individual issues, is just not in sync with that world, and wrong on solutions. So if media try to be “fair and balanced,” and give as much validity to right-wing thought as left of center, it’s not telling us the truth. If you have an argument between a flat-earther and a normal human, and you set things up as equally valid, you do the nation a huge disservice.

    But that’s what the MSM does. And it doesn’t want the Dems to win more often than the GOP. It wants a a horse race, a food fight, a conflict — that sells. It doesn’t want reality, evidence or facts to overcome “fake news” as presented by the right, because that hurts ratings. It wants a horse race between the two parties . . . which wouldn’t occur if Americans actually knew what was going on and voted their own best interests. Roughly 90% of them, at least, would vote Dem over Republican, with just those two choices.

    #86123
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Of course, if they were exposed to actual leftist ideas, philosophy, principles, ideals and policies, they’d dump BOTH the major parties and vote for something like the DSA platform. They’d say fuck off to the Dems AND the GOP, if they were really enlightened and voted their interests.

    But with the game rigged against alternatives, and for the duopoly, the MSM HAS to keep the contest alive.

    In short, IMO, there is no such thing as a “Dem-MSM.” But there is such a thing as right-wing media, and the latter doesn’t try to play things down the middle to keep the contest going.

    #86124
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    So, again, WV, I probably misunderstand you. But if you’re seeing a symmetrical dynamic of some kind between a “Dem-MSM” and a right-wing MSM . . . . I don’t agree. It’s asymmetrical, to begin with, and, as mentioned, I don’t think the first part exists.

    I think ALL of the MSM tilts right, and that the only reason it appears, in places, at times, to prefer the Dems to the GOP is when it’s just impossible for them to maintain the lie regarding “balance” or “both sides are the same” or “they both have equally valid positions.”

    When they can no longer play that game, and they finally come out and show the reality that the GOP engages in more destructive shhht than the Dems, it just seems they back the Dems.

    It’s not going to happen in my lifetime, but I hope America evolves beyond the two party system, cuz it’s killing us. Both parties are horrifically bad for us, and the planet, with the GOP being substantially worse. Our only chance is to move beyond them to include the far, far better voices, ideas, ideals and policies to the left of the Dems. Well to the left of them, IMO.

    . . . . The Dems are the real “conservative party” now, and have been, really, since the early 1970s. In order to actually represent the entire political spectrum, they should be considered America’s “right-wing” party, and they should be opposed by true left-wing alternatives which I’d support . . . again, like the DSA platform and further to the left. My own preference being for staunchly anticapitalist, small is beautiful, localized, egalitarian, cooperative economies, federated, under a fully democratized economy and society . . . . antiwar, mind-your-own business, protector of the environment, etc. etc.

    #86129
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    S . . . . I don’t agree. It’s asymmetrical, to begin with, and, as mentioned, I don’t think the first part exists.

    I think ALL of the MSM tilts right, and that the only reason it appears, in places, at times, to prefer the Dems to the GOP .

    ==============

    But Billy, the Dems ARE to the right nowadays. Yes its ALLL to the right. But there’s still a Dem-Right and a Rep-Right. Both have moved further and further Right.

    I still see MSNBC and NPR/PBS as leaning toward the Dems. (again, thats still leaning RIGHT). The main reason i see it that way is because they just rip Trump. They dont rip Obama’s policies or Clintons or Dem Policies. Its mainly just anti-trump stuff. No context in other words. Without context all trump-hating does is assure that the Dems will be back in office to run the system.

    w
    v

    #86131
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    S . . . . I don’t agree. It’s asymmetrical, to begin with, and, as mentioned, I don’t think the first part exists.

    I think ALL of the MSM tilts right, and that the only reason it appears, in places, at times, to prefer the Dems to the GOP .

    ==============

    But Billy, the Dems ARE to the right nowadays. Yes its ALLL to the right. But there’s still a Dem-Right and a Rep-Right. Both have moved further and further Right.

    I still see MSNBC and NPR/PBS as leaning toward the Dems. (again, thats still leaning RIGHT). The main reason i see it that way is because they just rip Trump. They dont rip Obama’s policies or Clintons or Dem Policies. Its mainly just anti-trump stuff. No context in other words. Without context all trump-hating does is assure that the Dems will be back in office to run the system.

    w
    v

    Thanks, WV. That clarification helps. I definitely agree with you that the Dems are center-right. I’ve been saying that forever. I don’t think they could even remotely call themselves even “liberal” after the 1960s.

    But, again, I don’t see being anti-Trump as necessarily being pro-Dem. I watch the MSM. I don’t know why I put myself through that, but I do. I watch the Bill Kristols, Joe Scarboroughs, David Frumms, Rick Wilsons, Nicole Wallaces — all conservative Republicans — bash Trump all day long. I guarantee you, once Trump leaves office, they’ll resume their regularly scheduled programming and go after the Dems, instead of Trump and his supporters.

    This is temporary, IOW.

    Trump is the guy creating these strange bedfellows. When he goes, it will all return to the old Dem versus Republican foodfight . . . the center-right against the increasingly hard-right.

    #86132
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    Strangely enough, WV, there ARE some ways the MSM actually help Trump tremendously and hurt the Dems’ chance to return to power.

    One biggie I’m noticing now? The normalization of corruption. It’s almost as if they all got the same memo. Whenever they talk about Cohen taking all of that money from corporate America and a few corporations overseas, they feel the need to add, “Well, this is the way DC works.” I rarely ever see their talking heads outraged over this direct Pay for Play, even though they covered it whenever Trump accused HRC of this during the campaign. Now it’s all supposed to be normal and A okay.

    They did the same with Kushner when he took meetings with two large corporations in the Oval Office and then got 500 million in loans from them.

    Trump has set new records for grifting while in office, and before he got there, and as mentioned earlier, Americans are being overwhelmed by this. I think the MSM too often treats it as just another day in the neighborhood, and might as well just add “blah blah blah” to each story.

    Naturalizing and normalizing Trump era corruption helps him and the GOP and hurts the Dems.

    As usual, the caveat for me is: I want BOTH parties to get the hell out of Dodge. Forever. They make me sicker than the chemo.

    #86138
    Avatar photowv
    Participant

    …It’s almost as if they all got the same memo..

    ============

    Well we are down to, what?, six corpse that control almost all the tv-media now?

    …Imagine a land where religion, nationalism, consumerism, self-absorption, racism, sexism, and corporate-capitalism were transcended. Wouldnt that be nice

    Not gonna happen though is it. I guess we just have to fight for one policy at a time, and hope for the best no matter what. And somehow find meaning,
    in a shit-storm of sureal-created-stupidity. 🙂

    w
    v

    Imagine there’s no heaven
    It’s easy if you try
    No hell below us
    Above us only sky
    Imagine all the people living for today
    Imagine there’s no countries
    It isn’t hard to do
    Nothing to kill or die for
    And no religion too
    Imagine all the people living life in peace, you
    You may say I’m a dreamer
    But I’m not the only one
    I hope some day you’ll join us
    And the world will be as one
    Imagine no possessions
    I wonder if you can
    No need…

    #86144
    Avatar photoBilly_T
    Participant

    …It’s almost as if they all got the same memo..

    ============

    Well we are down to, what?, six corpse that control almost all the tv-media now?

    …Imagine a land where religion, nationalism, consumerism, self-absorption, racism, sexism, and corporate-capitalism were transcended. Wouldnt that be nice

    Not gonna happen though is it. I guess we just have to fight for one policy at a time, and hope for the best no matter what. And somehow find meaning,
    in a shit-storm of sureal-created-stupidity. 🙂

    w
    v

    Imagine there’s no heaven
    It’s easy if you try
    No hell below us
    Above us only sky
    Imagine all the people living for today
    Imagine there’s no countries
    It isn’t hard to do
    Nothing to kill or die for
    And no religion too
    Imagine all the people living life in peace, you
    You may say I’m a dreamer
    But I’m not the only one
    I hope some day you’ll join us
    And the world will be as one
    Imagine no possessions
    I wonder if you can
    No need…

    Love that song. Lennon and the Beatles were wonders.

    I’m guessing you have this issue too. I imagine all leftists do. In political discussions, we have three, four, a dozen minds. Do we talk in the context of what is currently feasible, given the duopoly and corporate realities? Do we try to stretch the boundaries of the feasible? Or do we come out with our ideas, unapologetically, for how things ought to be — not just within the likely realm of possibility, but as they flat out really should be?

    Lots of shades within that too, degrees, variations, etc. etc.

    Do we discuss our options in the context of this eternal Dem versus Republican shit show? Or do we push for things well outside that dynamic, and make the case for that.

    Sanders gave us a bit more room to work with, but my own “ought” extends well beyond his policies. I don’t think he goes nearly far enough, for instance, on a host of things, though he is going in the “right” direction (meaning further left).

    How best communicate leftist principles, ideals, policies, etc. within the current context of political discussion . . . . which, IMO, has to be among the most narrow and limited in the world. As in, it’s A to B, rather than A to Z.

    ???

    #86146
    Avatar photoZooey
    Moderator

    Well before we even get to the changed landscape between now and the 70’s — there’s the issue of THE TAPES. Nixon taped himself doing all this shit. Without that unique dynamic, Nixon would have stonewalled and survived.

    But as to the video — 70 percent of Americans trusted the MSM back in the 70s. Was that a ‘good‘ thing? Good ole days of trusting the corporate media?

    I agree with the commentator that things are a dumpster-fire now. And i agree that things have changed with the rise of the rightwing-lie-machine.

    But things were not good in the olden days either. It was a different kind of dumpster-fire back in the 50’s, 60s, and 70s, etc. Back then i was listening to TV-MSM and i was being mislead every night. (Now, with the internet I have at least a small chance of finding my way toward the light.)

    I think the vid makes some good points about the change, but where I’d disagree is that he kinda tries to make the case that the MSM was more truthful back in the 70’s — because there was hardly any rightwing media. But i think the MSM has always been in the pocket of the Corps, as Chomsky talked about in the 80’s in Manufacturing Consent. Its just that now we have the Right-MSM lying to us from the right, and the Dem-MSM lying to us from the ‘left’. What do we do with that?

    Its also been my experience that Tucker Carlson (wacko that he is) is sometimes way more insightful on some issues than the Dem-MSM. On Syria for example. What to do with ‘that’ ?

    To me the voters are staggering toward catastrophe because they DO trust EITHER Fox OR NPR/MSNBC. They ought look at both behemoths as Factories-Of-Lies. But they trust one or the other. They ‘say’ they dont trust the MSM but they do — they trust one of the lie-machines. Or the other.

    Used to be we had one lie machine. Now we have two. So yes, things have changed.

    Just my opin-yun. Call me Mary Sunshine.

    w
    v

    Yeah, that went through my mind, too, after I watched the video. But upon reflection, I think the 60s and 70s journalism was better because – although it was limited by cultural assumptions, the 5 filters – there was at least a value placed on “objective journalism.” So while it wasn’t objective in a leftist perspective, there was at least some honesty on the part of the journalists, and hence, some ability to engage in discussion.

    Journalism today – particularly FOX and the entire right wing radio and internet subculture – deliberately lies. I’m sure many of those people have rationalized their lying as being in the “best interest” of the country, or whatever, but now we have a tremendous portion of the news landscape that has crossed over into blatant, conscious propaganda. That’s worse than unconscious propaganda, imo. Before now, journalists were the victims of propaganda. Now they are the architects of propaganda. That’s worse.

    But that’s not the main point of the video, anyway. I think the point is that Nixon was impeachable because there was a majority of public consensus within the public that he had crossed the line, and that there was a political expediency to impeaching him. Now because the Republican base literally believes that Trump is doing a great job, and believes that this entire investigation is nothing but Democrat dirty politics with no merit whatsoever, the Republicans have no need to respond to it. Republicans are so completely misinformed that there is no political cost to publicly supporting a grossly incompetent politician who is certainly violating ethics standards and probably guilty of numerous crimes, as well as terrible errors in policy. I mean…his base believes he’s great and that Obama’s presidency was the Dark Ages. So when they see libruls going apoplectic at Trump all the time, they just laugh and feel empowered.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Comments are closed.