Recent Forum Topics › Forums › The Rams Huddle › Watson
- This topic has 21 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 4 months ago by wv.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 1, 2022 at 1:06 pm #139900znModeratorBrooke Kromer@BrookeKromerIt is pretty shocking Watson is suspended only 6 games for sexual harassment AND sexual assault against many women. Women are supposed to feel safe working in an environment that doesn’t take sexual assault seriously??? As a woman that grew up in this league, I’m very disturbed..August 2, 2022 at 12:06 am #139910znModeratorJim Trotter@JimTrotter_NFLSo many thoughts on this initial six-game suspension for Deshaun Watson. It’s crazy for the arbiter to say his conduct was “egregious” and then give him such a soft punishment. This was a fail in her first significant ruling, and the league should appeal it.August 2, 2022 at 12:37 am #139911znModerator
Judge Robinson's decision in Deshaun Watson case turned on the distinction between violent and non-violent sexual assault. (Some would say sexual assault is sexual assault, with or without "violence.") https://t.co/1E5y9oOmRe
— ProFootballTalk (@ProFootballTalk) August 2, 2022
August 2, 2022 at 10:52 am #139920wvParticipantI have no idea what ‘justice’ looks like in a case that does not go to trial, and where two grand juries decided there was not enough evidence to indict, and where we dont know all the facts…..but…where 24 women have prettymuch told the same story.
How in the world do you add up all the knowns and unknowns in a case like this, and then do all the human-algebra and then turn it into “X number of game suspensions.”
The whole, entire, situation is post-modernly-surreal.
Thats all i got.
w
v
August 2, 2022 at 5:18 pm #139927HramParticipantGiven that, how do two grand juries to say there’s not enough to indict?
August 2, 2022 at 9:51 pm #139929znModeratorGiven that, how do two grand juries to say there’s not enough to indict?
That’s a question in its own right.
Meanwhile the league does not need a criminal indictment to determine if there are grounds for a suspension.
August 2, 2022 at 10:29 pm #139931znModeratorAugust 2, 2022 at 11:54 pm #139938InvaderRamModeratorI have no idea what ‘justice’ looks like in a case that does not go to trial, and where two grand juries decided there was not enough evidence to indict, and where we dont know all the facts…..but…where 24 women have prettymuch told the same story. How in the world do you add up all the knowns and unknowns in a case like this, and then do all the human-algebra and then turn it into “X number of game suspensions.” The whole, entire, situation is post-modernly-surreal. Thats all i got. w v
yeah.
the whole thing is just strange. i don’t really know much about the details. the only thing i can think of in recent memory that compares is that whole ben roethlisberger controversy that happened ten years ago. i just looked it up, and he was also suspended for 6 games. roethlisberger for sexual assault and watson for sexual misconduct. not sure if there’s a difference between those two words.
August 3, 2022 at 12:56 am #139939ZooeyModeratorI don’t know what is just in this case.
And I’m a little scared of judges who think they do know.
August 3, 2022 at 1:10 am #139940znModeratorI have no idea what ‘justice’ looks like in a case that does not go to trial, and where two grand juries decided there was not enough evidence to indict, and where we dont know all the facts…..but…where 24 women have prettymuch told the same story. How in the world do you add up all the knowns and unknowns in a case like this, and then do all the human-algebra and then turn it into “X number of game suspensions.” The whole, entire, situation is post-modernly-surreal. Thats all i got. w v
yeah. the whole thing is just strange. i don’t really know much about the details. the only thing i can think of in recent memory that compares is that whole ben roethlisberger controversy that happened ten years ago. i just looked it up, and he was also suspended for 6 games. roethlisberger for sexual assault and watson for sexual misconduct. not sure if there’s a difference between those two words.
Watson settled with all but one of the women who accused him.
*
Twenty-four women filed lawsuits against Watson, alleging that he assaulted or harassed them in massage appointments between 2020 and 2021, when he was on the Texans’ roster. Watson, who has denied any wrongdoing, settled 20 of those suits last month
from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/15/sports/football/deshaun-watson-settlement-texans.html
*
Watson’s agent Tony Buzbee told ESPN’s John Barr that the Browns quarterback has agreed to settle three of the four remaining civil lawsuits filed against him.
*
The 22 active civil suits allege Watson forced two women to perform oral sex, ejaculated on three women and in front of three others, groped four women and kissed another woman unprompted upon arrival for a massage appointment. Eighteen of the 22 active suits accuse Watson of inappropriately touching women with his penis during massage therapy sessions.
from https://theathletic.com/2496073/2022/07/15/deshaun-watson-sexual-assault/
August 3, 2022 at 12:29 pm #139942InvaderRamModeratorbut still no conviction. and i just read that the nflpa will fight if they try to suspend him for more.
that’s just all horrible.
August 3, 2022 at 1:01 pm #139944znModeratorbut still no conviction. and i just read that the nflpa will fight if they try to suspend him for more. that’s just all horrible.
There was no conviction because there was no trial and there was no trial because it was hard to prove what happened in one on one encounters.
The PA would not sue on Watson’s behalf, that would be entirely procedural in terms of what the agreed on protocols for suspensions are. It’s not this case, it’s any case that in the PA’s eyes pushes agreed upon protocols.
You do not pay off more than 2 dozen women with settlements if it’s nothing.
August 3, 2022 at 3:03 pm #139945InvaderRamModeratorbut still no conviction. and i just read that the nflpa will fight if they try to suspend him for more. that’s just all horrible.
There was no conviction because there was no trial and there was no trial because it was hard to prove what happened in one on one encounters. The PA would not sue on Watson’s behalf, that would be entirely procedural in terms of what the agreed on protocols for suspensions are. It’s not this case, it’s any case that in the PA’s eyes pushes agreed upon protocols. You do not pay off more than 2 dozen women with settlements if it’s nothing.
i never said the pa would sue. i never said nothing happened.
i’m just saying the whole thing is a mess.
August 3, 2022 at 3:21 pm #139946InvaderRamModeratorwell actually the nflpa had said it would sue if the suspension was for a year. i don’t know if it’d be on watson’s behalf or what. i don’t really care. i don’t understand the legality of all of it. i also read that the nflpa will challenge if the league tries to go against the decision and punish him for more.
my only point is that this is all a mess. everyone knows something happened. but how do you suspend him a year if predetermined protocols say 6 games?
it’s all very sad.
August 3, 2022 at 4:57 pm #139947znModeratorJeff Darlington@JeffDarlington
I’m told NFL is appealing for an indefinite suspension that would be a minimum of one year. But perhaps more significant given the structure of Watson’s contract, source tells me the NFL’s appeal will also include a monetary fine. Money is now a significant part of the equation.August 3, 2022 at 5:02 pm #139948znModeratorwell actually the nflpa had said it would sue if the suspension was for a year. .
My point was, the PA would not do that because it’s Watson or because they are on his side. It would simply be a matter of how suspensions are handled in all cases like this. It’s just a matter of how the rules are applied.
In fact, the NFL is appealing the suspension and asking for more.
I don’t happen to think this is a mess. I think Watson got caught by the judge who was the arbitrator for the case. The NFL wants a tougher suspension, and the PA wants to enforce strict adherence to suspension rules.
August 3, 2022 at 6:51 pm #139951InvaderRamModeratorMy point was, the PA would not do that because it’s Watson or because they are on his side. It would simply be a matter of how suspensions are handled in all cases like this. It’s just a matter of how the rules are applied.
yeah.
August 3, 2022 at 7:56 pm #139952wvParticipant.. but how do you suspend him a year if predetermined protocols say 6 games? it’s all very sad.
==
Its a mess, alright. I cringe every time i hear one of the talking-heads discuss whether it should be six games, eight games, seventeen games, etc, etc.
Like….how weird does your brain have to be, to think any of this stuff can be reduced to this or that amount of ‘games’ ?
I thought Hitler should have gotten a two-year suspension, btw. Zooey, too.
w
v
August 19, 2022 at 9:46 am #140165znModeratorDeshaun Watson's 11-game suspension brings finality to his situation and clarity to the Browns' plans for the season — but, @judybattista writes, questions remainhttps://t.co/TYdYKnkbuG pic.twitter.com/Ovhioa42bS
— Around The NFL (@AroundTheNFL) August 19, 2022
August 22, 2022 at 11:15 am #140218znModeratorCringe pic.twitter.com/WZOR3FHz6n
— PapaMace69 (@PapaMace69) August 22, 2022
August 22, 2022 at 1:56 pm #140221ZooeyModeratorAugust 22, 2022 at 4:28 pm #140224wvParticipantWell….thank god we all now have
“finality”
w
v
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.